Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
News
Politics
Federal Politics

Parliament No Place to Shovel Duffy Dirt, Speaker Implies

'The issue of taxpayer's money is government business,' retorts NDP's Angus.

Jeremy Nuttall 21 Apr 2015TheTyee.ca

Jeremy J. Nuttall is The Tyee's Parliament Hill reporter in Ottawa. Find his previous stories here.

This coverage of Canadian national issues is made possible because of generous financial support from our Tyee Builders.

image atom
Questions about the ongoing Mike Duffy trial were deflected by the Speaker of the House in Parliament on Monday.

Questions about information coming out of the trial of suspended senator Mike Duffy are not related to government business, implied Canada's Speaker of the House Andrew Scheer during question period on Monday.

On the first day that Parliament has sat since the Duffy trial began, Scheer repeatedly told opposition MPs to ensure their questions "touch on the administrative areas of government," in an apparent attempt to curb those based on the trial.

The speaker, an MP elected by secret ballot by members, is tasked with guiding debate in the House of Commons in a nonpartisan way.*

Duffy has plead not guilty to all charges, including 30 counts of fraud and breach of trust, and one charge of bribery, relating to his time as a senator. He was appointed as a Conservative to the senate in 2008, but quit the party in 2013 amid controversy over his expenses.

Evidence entered at his trial, including his diary, has provided a glimpse into the world of federal politics.

New Democrat MP Charlie Angus -- who pointed out the diary mentions more than 600 dinners and only twice talks about senate business -- said his questions about how much work Duffy did for the constituents of his senate seat were perfectly legitimate.

"The issue of taxpayer's money is government business," Angus said after question period. "I know this is certainly a touchy time right now, but I'm surprised that suddenly these are questions that are not allowed to be asked."

Another question about taxpayers footing the bill for Prime Minister Stephen Harper's makeup at a G8 Summit came from Liberal MP Wayne Easter, who also demanded an investigation into the matter.

'Bafflegab ridiculous answer'

Parliamentary secretary to the prime minister and Conservative MP Paul Calandra didn't answer the questions posed by opposition members, reasoning that they are part of an ongoing court case. Instead, Calandra tried to turn the debate around on past scandals involving the Liberals or the NDP.

Angus pointed out that Speaker Scheer didn't stop Calandra's deflections.

"We had some bafflegab ridiculous answer from Mr. Calandra that seemed to be perfectly okay (to the speaker), and we follow up trying to get more answers, and we're shut down," he said.

Pausing for a split second when asked by The Tyee why he didn't answer the questions on Monday afternoon, Calandra opted to head up the stairs, away from the media.

It's not the first time that Scheer and Calandra have provoked the opposition.

In September, Calandra tearfully apologized to the House of Commons for not giving appropriate answers about Canada's role in Iraq, instead talking about the NDP's stance on Israel.

During the debate leading to that apology, NDP leader Thomas Mulcair questioned Scheer's neutrality.

*Story corrected April 21 at 8 a.m.  [Tyee]

Read more: Politics, Federal Politics

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Are You Concerned about AI?

Take this week's poll