News

Grieving Families Want Tougher Justice for Workplace Deaths

Delegation to demand more investigation and prosecution against negligent employers.

By Tom Sandborn, 28 Aug 2012, TheTyee.ca

Family of workplace death

Brothers Sam (left) and Arlen Fitzpatrick. Sam was killed in an accident tied to management carelessness and his father is part of a delegation demanding more consequences for negligent management.

Related

"They ought to slap the cuffs on them," Brian Fitzpatrick says.

The tall, rugged former logger and heavy equipment operator is talking about the Peter Kiewit Sons & Company managers and supervisors whom he holds responsible for his son Sam's death.

Sam Fitzpatrick was crushed by a falling boulder at a worksite on Toba Inlet in 2009, in an incident that a Worksafe BC inspector said reflected "reckless and grossly negligent" decision making by company management who had ordered heavy equipment to operate upslope from where Sam and his brother Arlen were working despite an incident the previous day in which a huge rock came down the slope and barely missed workers below. Arlen saw his brother die. (The Worksafe BC report is here.)

"In just one ugly moment, Sam was killed," Brian Fitzpatrick told The Tyee. "His hopes, dreams and joy of life smashed out of him. Arlen's days as a young man, looking forward with youthful enthusiasm to the future, were ripped away from him in the same ugly moment. In that horrible instant, the color left his world. Sam and Arlen relied on each other for many things and were closer than twins on many levels spiritually and emotionally."

Brian Fitzpatrick is part of a delegation of nearly a dozen bereaved family members who have lost loved ones to workplace accidents in B.C. Also in the group will be family members of Sarabjit Kaur Sidhu and Amarjit Kaur Bal, killed in the wreck of an improperly maintained van without seat belts being used to transport farm workers in 2007 and the wife and daughter of Michael Phan, left permanently brain damaged after a 2008 tragedy at a Langley mushroom farm that killed three of his fellow workers and permanently injured another.

The delegation, organized by the BC Federation of Labour, meets today with two provincial ministers in Vancouver to press demands that employers who take risks that kill or injure their employees face real and effective legal sanctions, up to and including imprisonment.

The group is slated to meet with Justice Minister Shirley Bond and Labour Minister Margaret MacDiarmid today, Aug. 28, and both family members and labour leaders have a lot to tell the BC Liberal Ministers.

According to a draft of the brief that will be presented to the ministers obtained by The Tyee from the BC Fed:

"It is our firm conviction that until corporate criminal negligence is taken seriously; until corporate representatives are sentenced to jail time due to their criminal negligence; these preventable and tragic deaths and serious injuries will continue to occur."

The delegation will be urging the provincial ministers to support a series of reforms designed to prevent the kind of tragedies that killed or crippled the workers whose family members will be in attendance. The key recommendations, as noted in the BC Fed draft, will be:

1) 'Dedicate a Crown Prosecutor to deal with workplace fatality and serious injury cases.'

"The dedicated prosecutor will become an expert in reviewing these investigations against Section 217.1 of the Criminal Code and, therefore, more accurately determining the likelihood of conviction."

Section 217.1 of the Code, adopted in 2004 after more than a decade of trade union pressure following the lethal mine accident at the Westray mine in Nova Scotia in 1992, notionally makes it possible to prosecute an employer or supervisor who fails to fulfill "a legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to that person, or any other person" at the employer's behest.

However, as the delegation will be pointing out to the ministers, since the law was adopted in 2004, its enforcement history has been unimpressive. Only a handful of charges have been laid, and of those cases only two have gone to trial and only one has led to a conviction. To put this into perspective, Stats Canada reports that in 2010, the most recent year for which national figures are available, 1,014 work related fatalities occurred in Canada, while 190 work related deaths occurred in B.C. in 2011.

abbotsford-car-wreck.jpg

Harsharan Singh Bal, whose mother died in this farmworker van crash in 2007, demands to know why no charges were filed.

2) 'Train police services on Section 217.1 of the Criminal Code'

"This will ensure that police understand the law and know what to look for in workplace fatality and serious injury cases in order to collect the best evidence to support the Crown Counsel's decision making. (See the CLC guide "A Criminal Code Offence: Death & Injury at Work.")

3) 'Mandatory police investigations of all workplace fatalities and serious injuries.'

"Police investigations are necessary in order to determine if criminal negligence exists, as they are trained to collect and weigh criminal evidence. These investigations must be separate from the OHS regulatory investigation, but can be done collaboratively."

BC Fed president Jim Sinclair, who will be leading the delegation today, said, "These ministers can make a difference, if they want to. The law is clear. Criminal negligence should lead to strong penalties. Some businessmen should be charged and jailed in cases like these. We want employers to face clear consequences. Nobody should have a get out of jail free card."

Sinclair said that politicians who say they are tough on crime should be tough on employers who endanger their workers.

"We don't expect to fill the jails with CEOs," he said, "but in some circumstances, jail is appropriate."

'My mother was a human being'

"Kill a worker, go to jail, should be the rule," Steve Hunt of the United Steelworkers, who expects to be part of the meeting with ministers, told The Tyee. Hunt's union, which represented the 26 workers killed in the Westray disaster, played a leading role in the campaign to bring in the new criminal code language designed to prevent repetitions of the tragedy.

"Eight thousand workers have died at work since the law was passed, and there have been no successful prosecutions," Hunt said. "Employers can kill workers with impunity. We're not sure why the law isn't being used properly."

Harsharan Singh Bal, who lost his mother Amarjit in the 2007 van crash, agrees.

"My mother was a human being, not an animal," he told The Tyee. "We are going to ask the ministers why no charges were laid. Someone should go to jail for this, and the loopholes in the law should be closed."

In 2007, a clearly broken hearted Bal told The Tyee, "The last day with my mother, she cooked food for me and my little sister. Then we saw her body on TV, with her shoes knocked off and on the highway. It was really killing to see that."

Jagjit Singh Sidhu, who lost his wife Sarabjit in the same tragedy, pointed out that an RCMP investigation into the van crash recommended that 33 criminal charges be laid against the van driver and the company that owned the van. All the charges were dropped by Crown Counsel, Sidhu said.

"We are very angry," Sidhu told The Tyee. "Three people died and 14 others were injured, and the all that happened was a $2,000.00 fine. What is this joke?"

Tracy Phan, Michael Phan's daughter, told The Tyee that she and her mother would be part of the delegation today because "we don't want this to happen to anyone again. We hope the laws will be enforced to prevent these kinds of accidents in the future."  [Tyee]

8  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Hakuin

    38 weeks ago

    doesn't matter what the law is.

    Raise your kids so they understand damned well that they have to look out for themselves at all times. I've never met an employer yet that couldn't somehow rationalize risking my life for a buck.

  • alive

    38 weeks ago

    Hakuin

    I totally agree, but it takes guts to refuse working if you suspect danger.

    Amongst other things, it somehow goes on your record and you can kiss any promotion good bye!

    Whereas the supervisor who "happens " to obstruct a proper investigation winds up with yet another promotion.

    Them who has the gold, calls the tune!, at least in this country where unions do not have enough clout.

  • retsof

    38 weeks ago

    The government is not going

    The government is not going to change the rules. Workers are just an expense to make more money. They don't see them as a human being with family, friends, lives, etc. They can easily be replaced.

    Workers have never had the protection they actually deserve. Some unionized work places have more protection through their collective agreements but the end result is frequently the employer "walks".

    If a worker is killed on the job & it is due to employer negligence then there needs to be a charge of death caused by negligence & there needs to be jail time. Until there is jail time for worker deaths, employers have no reason to change how they operate. Fines are simply a business expense. We have only to look at the women farm workers killed in the van on the highway or the mushroom farm workers.

    People are sent to jail for causing death due to drinking & driving or causing death through negligence. It is about time workers received the same recogniztion. Their lives are important to their families. If the odd employer went to jail, things might be a whole lot safer. It won't just be a fine but time in jail for the ceo, president of the b of d., whatever.

  • paisley

    38 weeks ago

    Criminal Negligence

    Employees that refuse or complain to undertake work that may result in physical harm or death will find themselves subject to coercion, demotion or unemployment. Such is the reality of "free enterprise". Having sat on a safety committee in a unionized industrial complex I was always astounded at the lack of accountability and the difficulty to rectify safety concerns with management. Safety issues were put aside to meet budget restraints and WCB proved a compliant partner.
    The union side of the safety committee finally got fed up with the foot dragging on serious issues and we decided to take the position that if workers were injured or worse killed, that our first response would be a visit to the local RCMP detachment seeking criminal charges. This we advised management. That did get their attention and safety was addressed in a somewhat more meaningful way although cue "harassment" for those union members taking said position.
    There are many stories from logging camps where WCB made orders for repair under duress. Specifically, the duress of being "punched out" by irate workers. This was a subtle approach usually out of earshot of management personnel as witnessed threats of violence will quickly result in dismissal. Such are the current rules of the game and a sad state when threats of violence are the only option to keep oneself and coworkers from harms way.
    It is far past the time that employers be held criminally responsible for injuries and deaths caused by negligence or at the very least civilly liable for negligence.

  • Mikep

    38 weeks ago

    I worked with Brian and his

    I worked with Brian and his boys on the Sea to Sky highway job. Brian Fitzpatrick is fighting a heroic battle against a 10 billion dollar a year company for justice and to help protect future workers.

    The proposed WorkSafe fine of 250,000 dollars is approximately 13 minutes of the company's 2010 revenue.

    This is one of those times when an ex-logger and equipment operator is going to come knocking on the doors of the corporation...and the suits inside will be very afraid.
    Take it all the way, Brian!

  • Fritz

    38 weeks ago

    The System is Corrupt

    "Eight thousand workers have died at work since the law was passed, and there have been no successful prosecutions..."

    If you could examine the amount of election donations of the deceased you would see they gave less than the corporations.
    Also the corporation usually can hire a fancier legal team than the crown.

    For half a decade I drove semi and one day I refused to haul an overweight load. The dispatcher said okay spot the trailer and bobtail back to the yard. He said I'll call you when we need you. He never called. If I got caught overweight the law came after me, not the dispatcher, not the owner of the company, not the shipper, not the owner of the load. They came after easy pickings, me, Mr. Nobody. The company had a spotter to check for routes around the weigh scales and I told the Metro Toronto Police, the OPP and the Ministry of Transportation ...they didn't give a s**t.

    The next company I drove for had 6 of us pick up 95,000 lbs of soap at Lever Bros every Friday morning, our legal limit was 45,000 lbs. They only kept the trailers for six months or they would become sway backed. They insisted I come in extra early Thursday mornings on my own time for "Safety" lessons. I said we'll come in when you stop making us haul those 95,000 lb loads. The other 5 walked out with me.

  • BG

    38 weeks ago

    Justice

    The people responsible should suffer the same fate they inflicted on the worker. Instead of a slap on the wrist they should just be crushed to death.

  • Fii

    38 weeks ago

    My deepest condolences...

    My deepest condolences... what a handsome and gentle young man he looks like in the photo. Is there a petition or something people can sign?? What can we do to help?

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.