- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Medicinal Grow-ops Remain Uncharted Territory
Many pose hazards, say Surrey officials. But other local BC politicians worry more oversight will snuff out a good thing.
Pot as medicine: Balancing privacy against municipal safety concerns.
When Dan Barnscher, Surrey's deputy fire chief, travelled to Vancouver at the end of September, he was there to warn municipal politicians from across the province that marijuana grown for medical purposes was causing problems in his city. The hard-to-locate grow-ops posed risks ranging from bad smells to fire hazards, said Barnscher.
That's why the deputy chief was part of a Surrey delegation pushing the Union of British Columbia Municipalities (UBCM) to pass a resolution calling on Health Canada to require that licensed grow-ops be obliged to comply with all local zoning and safety regulations, so that municipalities would know of every licensed grow operation within their boundaries.
The resolution failed to pass -- as had similar resolutions in previous years. Why wouldn't cities seek more control over the places where cannabis is being grown for medicinal purposes?
Barnscher himself confided a fact that helps explain why the local politics of medical marijuana are more complicated than they might appear.
He revealed that his deceased mother had used legally obtained cannabis during her final illness. That made her one among a million -- the number of medicinal pot-using Canadians by some estimates.
'Let's legalize it': Metchosin councillor
For Barnscher, the issue is not whether medical marijuana is sometimes effective. He just wants to make sure that Surrey and other municipalities know of all the legal grow-ops within their borders and can enforce all applicable zoning and safety regulations.
"I'm all for medical marijuana," the deputy chief told The Tyee.
But then, so is Moralea Milne, a city councillor from the Vancouver Island community of Metchosin. Milne got a round of applause and laughter at the UBCM gathering when she called for making pot legal, period.
"The resolution before us is a Band-Aid solution," Milne said. "Everyone in this room has probably tried pot at least once. Let's legalize it. Pot is a part of the fabric of our community."
Milne later told The Tyee she herself hadn't smoked cannabis in decades.
Tightening controls on medical marijuana production has been a tough sell for several years at UBCM. In 2009, the convention declined to endorse a medical marijuana resolution due to concerns about medical privacy.
This year, the UBCM referred the Surrey resolution back to its executive committee, putting off for a second year the attempt to have the provincial umbrella group take a stand on medical marijuana.
But before the resolution was sent back, delegates who attended an early morning clinic titled "Medical Marijuana Access Regulations: Local Government Interests" heard Barnscher and City Solicitor Craig MacFarlane present the case for the Surrey position. They argued that the current Health Canada regime for medical marijuana production and distribution creates unacceptable risks to local communities.
The Surrey officials cited the existence of 38 legal but previously unknown grow-ops in their town that they had "stumbled upon" because of tips from neighbours or routine inspections, and invoked the dangers of illicit re-wiring, pesticide contamination and noxious smells they said occurred at unregulated grow-ops, whether licensed or not.
Waiting for the feds
The morning clinic and the later debate in the general meeting both heard passionate statements from city councillors, some of who identified themselves as users of licensed medical marijuana.
One of those was Victoria City Councillor Philippe Lucas, a hepatitis C sufferer who sponsored the move to refer the Surrey resolution until next year.
Lucas, who is a research affiliate with the Centre for Addictions Research of B.C., pointed out that Health Canada was still involved in consultations about proposed changes to Canada's contentious medical marijuana regime, calling the proposed Surrey resolution "premature."
In a conversation that day with The Tyee, Lucas said that Health Canada itself reports over a million Canadians say they use cannabis for medical purposes and that 44 per cent of Canadians have used pot at some point in their lives, with 10 per cent of Canadian adults reporting cannabis use within the last month.
Lucas said he supports what he calls "evidence-based public policy," designed to mitigate harms. He advocates cannabis decriminalization and a community based, decentralized system for access to cannabis in which local dispensaries would play a "huge role."
"Prohibition does more harm than good," Lucas said. "It creates crime and has been a huge failure." He said that jurisdictions such as Holland and Portugal that have decriminalized personal use of cannabis have seen reduced levels of substance abuse, especially among young people.
"But decriminalization and medical marijuana are different issues," he underlined. "Whatever happens in terms of decriminalization, we should be trying to make access to medical use cannabis easier, less bureaucratic and more decentralized. We need to increase options for patients."
Violation of privacy?
Another convention delegate who opposed the Surrey resolution and publicly identified as a medical marijuana user was Joy Davies, a first term member of the Grand Forks council. Davies, a semi-retired businesswoman who operates an antique shop in Grand Forks, told The Tyee that medical cannabis eased the symptoms of her fibromyalgia and attention deficit disorder. She first became an advocate for better access to medical marijuana after a friend of hers, denied a Health Canada license, committed suicide. Since then, she has not only used medical marijuana to make her own life more bearable, but she has also nursed her mother at the end of her life, using cannabis tea to ease pain and promote appetite and weight gain. The cannabis helped her mother have, she said with obvious emotion, "the best possible death."
Barnscher noted that Surrey had adopted a bylaw this summer designed to regulate medical marijuana production.
The new bylaw came under fire from anti-prohibition and medical marijuana activists when it was proposed, with one prominent activist saying it would require every patient, as well as those producing for other patients, to register with the City.
"This is the equivalent of requiring patients to register with the City before filing a prescription," said Jacob Hunter, Policy Director of the Beyond Prohibition Foundation. "Can you imagine telling a patient in intense pain that they have to file for a City permit to fill a morphine prescription? This proposed bylaw is unthinkably cruel."
Confusing legal terrain
All this debate about medical marijuana and its regulation is taking place in a confused legal context in Canada, as Victoria Councillor Lucas pointed out to The Tyee. "Over the last decade," he said, "Canadian laws on marijuana have been ruled unconstitutional seven times."
Most recently, in an April 12 ruling ruling in the case R. vs. Mernagh, Ontario Superior Court Justice Donald Taliano found that Canada's Marihuana Medical Access Regulations and "the prohibitions against the possession and production of cannabis (marihuana) contained in sections 4 and 7 respectively of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act" are "constitutionally invalid and of no force and effect."
So if the Union of BC Municipalities finds it hard to arrive at a consensus on medical cannabis, it is in good company. Clearly, the courts of the land are having the same difficulty, and Health Canada, some critics say, is floundering too.
Meanwhile, if the figure of a million Canadians who use cannabis for medical reasons is accurate, the current Health Canada program that has enrolled an estimated 10,000 licensed users is clearly not adequate. Some observers will hold out hope that the current Health Canada policy review and consultation will help cure a system that is ill with bureaucratic delays and irrational reluctance to let Canadians choose the medicines that work for them.
Only time will tell if that hope is sound, or just more federal smoke and mirrors.
Find more Tyee reporting on Rights and Justice here. ![]()




31
Login or register to post comments
igbymac
32 weeks ago
Our state forfeited its legitimacy ...
long, long ago. It now keeps us in check with various forms of coercion and the ever-looming threat of violence. Does anyone seriously respect the government? I think any conscionable person would be ashamed of it if anything.
It's time to stop wasting our time asking these dill-holes for their permission, and to begin conducting ourselves with some self-respect.
The idea that the state can pick and choose what parts of nature to criminalize is patently absurd. 'You have the wrong vegetation in your pocket and, accordingly, we will now blackball you and even ruin your life if necessary'. And even then, that's not enough for these crackpots.
pianosaurus rex
32 weeks ago
Agreed
By attempting to choose which parts of nature are to be illegal the state reveals it illegitimacy to govern, and simply reveals once again its Judeo-Christian based value of “we have to be saved from ourselves” bias.
The entire prohibition ideology is nothing more than a complete failure of experimental social engineering.
Anyone who chooses to use a drug of any sort is using it now, the state and its laws notwithstanding.
It is long past the time when anyone I know of cared one iota about what the states’ opinion of drug consumption is.
However, I do agree with the premise of the article in which any commercial operation should be checked for proper permits, correct handling/ storage of chemicals related to growing, and for proper construction according to building codes.
It is true that wiring not up to code requirements, and improper use and storage of chemicals present a danger to the immediate neighbourhood.
scubajane
32 weeks ago
medical cannabis
I have severe spinal stenosis, when I have an neurological attack I have the same symptoms as someone with Primary Progressive MS. I try to keep most of my therapy to alternative medicine, my stomach can only handle pain killers for a day or two. Because of where some of the stenosis is in my spine my shoulders can freeze from 1 to 4 times a year, right now I have a pinched nerve in my spine since the end of June of this year... so pretty much I am in pain every day. I manage it with Medical Cannabis, acupuncture and and British trained Osteopath. my grower is wonderful and very responsible, she also does not use GMO Seed and uses no pesticides. I believe there is only ONE inspector for western Canada and that person is in Saskatchewan and the federal government has not given this person the budget to get out of his own province, how much sense does that make....
Yes, i have heard that some growers do grow more than they should, so yes they should be penalized. But the bigger problem is the illegal growups and all the other wonderful drugs they make, bring in and sell. Personally I think Cannabis should be legalized and I am not saying give it to young people, but for people who are ill and in pain, it is a great non-addictive pain killer and has many other benefits. regulate it like alcohol and tax it heavily. here is one website http://phoenixtears.ca/ ....
I am very aware that Health Canada wants to quit growing medical cannabis(theirs is pretty awful and expensive, would never use it) and have one or two firms grow for them. I would never use this cannabis, because I would never now if it had pesticides used on it, or if they start to use GMO Seed. I will buy on the street if Health Canada cancels my growers license. I am also very aware that Health Canada would rather have us on pharmaceuticals that damage our organs rather on cannabis that has very few side effects, because they want more control over us and also get kick backs from the Pharmaceutical companies....
cheers
jane
sooke, BC
Lawrence
32 weeks ago
Fire guys
Shouldn't be involved in law enforcement, very bad American idea
Or politics, unless it's to get some new equipment
Cops shouldn't routinely put out fires.
I'm sure some grow opps have fires and ventilation problems.
I'm just as sure it's very few, because that would be poor management.There has to be 20 books that will tell you do it properly
If this UBCM resolution was passed the municipalities would use the information to eliminate grow opps, not regulate them
freewilly
32 weeks ago
Orchids or Pot
Ive been watching the series "Prohibition" on pbs one of the best docs Ive seen. Too many similarities with this issue of pot.
A few years ago, I tried to grown Orchids. Ive also grown tomatoes, herbs, beans and other veg to see what was possible, indoors. It can be a safe thing to do and the power requirements and design of space are the same. A sterile environment is also important, so you need plastic sheeting, big fans for ventilation, pumps, timers, ph meters etc....
The bigbox stores sell pretty much all the gear needed to turn your house into a forest.
They even sell the 1000 watt HPS bulbs.
I really like to cook, especially with fresh ingredients, imagine a home designed with an indoor grow adjacent to the kitchen and fresh veg with dinner every night.
What concerned me was the heat and protection needed for grow lights. For safe indoor use you should have a series of lower wattage lights 200 to 400 watts in an enclosure with fans cooling and redirecting the heat.
People weld in their garages, build labs and tesla coils, do wood working, laquor furniture while they smoke cigarettes. Are we going to regulate everyone in town who has a hobby or small business? People do dangerous things.
ianstephen1
32 weeks ago
Existing laws apply
Municipalities already have zoning and licensing that regulates businesses within their boundaries. A legal grow-op would have to operate in an area where zoning allows that sort of business. A business licence would be required. Any electrical work done would require a licensed contractor and a permit and inspections from the city or the BC Safety Authority (Surrey uses BCSA).
If these things are being ignored, is it only by licensed grow-ops or is there a wider problem with enforcement of existing laws and regulations that apply to businesses? I hope that municipalities are asking how they can ensure that businesses of all kinds are being conducted properly. Faulty wiring or improper pesticide handling are just as hazardous in a restaurant or farm as in a medicinal grow-op.
Dan the socialist
32 weeks ago
Surrey never enforces its by
Surrey never enforces its by laws unless it is for the Gestapo to come and do a home inspection even to people who outright own their own homes....That is the bigger issue of this to me. Same problems happen in Mission and Coquitlam as well.
Marijuana should be out right re legalised as far as I am concerned. It is far less dangerous than legal prescription drugs or that alcohol that is probably the worse legal drug in the country by far.
freewilly
32 weeks ago
to scubajane
Pot helps people in so many ways. It heightens appetite, provides pain relief, useful for psychiatric issues and more. The byproducts of hemp have numerous applications.
The laws are uneven, unfair and crazy. Laws that create hypocrisy. Most Canadians know it should be legalized. There are health risks, but its difficult studying something thats illegal and such a hot political potato.
I disagree with taxing weed the same way as alchohol or tobacco. Those sinful pleasures are over taxed already....
metacomet
32 weeks ago
Bad Smells
Surrey's Fire Chief has legitimate concerns about illegal wiring and fire hazards, but his position was weakened by making specious arguments that go beyond those concerns and smack of alarmism.
Legal pot growers have modest operations that don't require illegally hacking into the power grid. Most households already have hydro service that can handle their power needs and if they need a new circuit, they can call an electrician. The Fire Chief may not intend to confuse illegal and legal operations but he has done so nonetheless.
Something was indeed smelly when he raised the spectre of chemical contamination from fertilizers and pesticides that might be used in legal grow-ops when tons of such chemicals are dumped on lawns and gardens in most urban areas at a rate tens or hundreds of times higher than on farms. He might note that medical marijuana users, and therefore their suppliers, are quite particular about the purity of their medicine. Virtually all medical pot is 100% organic. Once again he confused legal with illegal operations.
No thinking city council would deny sick people their medicine and don't want to lump them in with criminals. As noted, illegal grow-ops exist because prohibition makes them lucrative. The Fire Chief would have done better to warn them of prohibition, not sick people.
Lawrence
32 weeks ago
And another thing
The only pest I've ever heard about in grow ops are spider mites which I believe are handled by ladybugs,not pesticides.
A good overview of pest management in grow ops was aired in an episode of Trailer Park Boys, forget which one...
Vox.Pop
32 weeks ago
Honesty
Banning marijuana is just another Harper-sop to the Americans and their failed & ridiculous 'war on drugs'.
Give me one direct anecdotal success story on 'alternative' therapies versus one hundred 'scientific' studies paid for by Big Pharma, like the latest 'kill' job on vitamin E and prostate cancer.
RickW
32 weeks ago
Mr. Harper Cares..........
Shows just how intersted The Harper Government is in the welfare of Canucks....
igbymac
32 weeks ago
I believe there is only ONE
It makes perfect sense to the neocon. Defund everything remotely liberal and then point and say, Failure!!!
zalm
32 weeks ago
Use existing laws - no need for new ones
As long as grow-ops remain a magnet for violent ripoffs, the city should be involved as it's responsible for policing and public safety. The city's already responsible for zoning and business operation within its property limits so all it needs to check out an existing grow-op is a bylaw officer, a supervisor, and a publicly-elected councillor, all with some stones to stand up to the organized thuggery that the pot-smoking libertarian horde has become.
We don't know enough about the benefits or dangers of marijuana yet to call it a "safe" drug, and we certainly can't compare it to alcohol, which has no known medicinal value. Attempts to do so have fallen into absurdist error and bring humiliation on their espousers, so it's disappointing to read so many useless comments of this nature here, where I would expect a more considered opinion.
When a useful hand-held detector is developed for cannabis users, and the right to detect at any time - whether while at work, or in public where harm might come to another through intoxication such as while driving - is entrenched in law, then I'll support decriminalization and licenced production by regulated private manufacturers.
Til then, my opinion remains that the vast majority of cannabis-users are not in medical need of marijuana, but merely want to exercise their individuality by flying by my house in car or on bike, getting gooned on their way to work, or blowing it all out on the way home, littering butts, candy wrappers and shouted conversations into cellphones through the neighbourhood.
Anybody still hoping for generalized acceptance of unregulated pot-smoking has to realize they've a hard row to hoe, what with the childish actions of the large number of ordinary abusers.
zalm
32 weeks ago
P. rex
"Anyone who chooses to use a drug of any sort is using it now, the state and its laws notwithstanding.
It is long past the time when anyone I know of cared one iota about what the states’ opinion of drug consumption is."
That may be; however, I'm certainly most in favour of my own opinion of drug consumption. Just like salvationist evangelical Christianity, drugs like alcohol and pot are best consumed in the privacy of one's own home, and only when the narcotic effects have substantially worn off, should the (ab)user be permitted to rejoin and contribute to society.
One should not be flying a jetliner, multitasking while walking across a busy intersection, or governing the country while in any kind of ecstasy - and that goes for alcohol-induced, narcotic-induced or Cross-induced.
Now, we have culturally accommodated to some form of public alcohol use, although it's a bit fuzzy around the boundaries. In the interest of civic harmony, I suggest we give this a bit of a bye until we come up with a properly-thought-through ethic of drug use and abuse that takes into account civic responsibilities as well as civic freedoms. I'm a little bit tired of hearing the words "I gotta right....!" especially by people who can't even identify a single one of the fundamental rights we do have.
igbymac
32 weeks ago
Just a thought on rights, zalm
I don't believe we have any 'fundamental rights' granted in Canada. The 'rights' mentioned don't give a person anything they do not naturally possess but, rasther, the 'rights' impose limits or restrictions on one's conduct. At the end of the day, one's only 'right' is to obey the state.
Like many things in the political realm, 'rights' are marketed to the citizen as one thing but do quite another. I think the word 'right' could be loosely called a political auto-antonym. That is, a word that has two meanings, one the opposite of the other.
Other such words I can call up without too much consideration include 'democracy', 'majority', 'representative', 'freedom fighters', 'socialism', 'just war', or even legislated Acts like 'workers compensation insurance'.
Cheers.
Oh, I might add, criminalizing nature, a plant, is still patently absurd. And it will not be considered analogous to alcohol, imo, until I can wander the woods and find a bottle of Jack Daniels sprouting forth. :) Of course, state regulation short of the patently absurd (i.e., criminalization) is another issue.
pianosaurus rex
32 weeks ago
rights? what rights?
There are two rights people have;
One is the right to life; the other is the right to pay your taxes in full.
The rest of the “imagined rights” are nothing more than extraneous nonsense invented by people for their own psychological comfort…..
Zalm;
“Til then, my opinion remains that the vast majority of cannabis-users are not in medical need of marijuana, but merely want to exercise their individuality by flying by my house in car or on bike, getting gooned on their way to work, or blowing it all out on the way home, littering butts, candy wrappers and shouted conversations into cellphones through the neighbourhood.”
I had no idea it was only the drug induced who littered, consumed candy, and shouted into their electronic devices…..If we removed all of this over-generalized stereotype from our society there would not be many left around…..
Zalm again;
“Anybody still hoping for generalized acceptance of unregulated pot-smoking has to realize they've a hard row to hoe, what with the childish actions of the large number of ordinary abusers.”
Ah, I believe this train left the station a long time back; generalized acceptance of unregulated marijuana smoking happened shortly after the Le Dain Commission in 1972…….in the last decade alone, certain sections of the law regarding marijuana have been struck down seven times……
Zalm,
During the mid 80’s I was a part owner in a night club in Victoria. After five years I was done; you have no idea what the general public consumes in public; if you did you would be simply astonished….and then they all drive home.
My point is this; anyone who chooses to use a drug of any type, does use that drug. Oh sure, they politely listen to the states guidance and nod obediently; then they go back to doing whatever they were doing in the first place. Nobody really cares what the state thinks regarding drug consumption.
Why should they? When you have the head of this province premier caught driving pissed out of his gourd and then let off, what example does this set for the rest of society?
Anyways if medical marijuana growers want to be licensed they will have to comply with all of the hoops the license issuer makes them jump through. It is the same for any commercial business; there are regulations; municipal, provincial, or federal.
demotto
32 weeks ago
If
If it is legal to do with license it must be lawful to do without otherwise one could get a license to murder.
pianosaurus rex
32 weeks ago
there is a liscense to murder
Just ask the four idiots who attended the airport and dealt with Robert Djeskanski or the fellow in the interior who was shot dead in the back of the head for having an open beer at a sports game.
freewilly
32 weeks ago
regarding spider mites and bad smells
Spider mites are difficult to control in any indoor setting, wether you are growing pot, orchids, tomatoes, beans or herbs.
Ive heard of people introducing ladybugs but they tend to fly away. Some people introduce other predatory mites. Neem oil, Safers soap all good products work to some extent.
Healthy, well tended plants stand a better chance against mites.
It should be of concern to municipal politicians, fire chiefs and staff that any chemicals, detergents or fertilizers that go down storm drains in Surrey will end up either in the Serpentine or Nikelmakel river. Both have Salmon stocks and hatcheries. Its been a problem for a long while.
demotto
32 weeks ago
Thank you pr
do they really have that license, I think not. Alas people apparently like the fact that any one of them at any time could end up a victim of these goons by simply asking a question or being confused or disoriented for medical or other reasons it matters not. they are to protect us not kill us for sport so they can laugh at us and carry on with impunity. Where are the honest peace officers the ones that joined to do good not to be herd hands in cattle yard using prods and force do force compliance to unknown law..
Fish-counter
32 weeks ago
Just legalise it!
It is just a plant. It makes some people happy. Let them grow it for Christ's sake. Tax the sales and build new schools with the revenue.
Any politican who disagrees like Stephen Harper for example, should be *beeped*.
zalm
32 weeks ago
igbymac
Last time I checked, our Charter did confer certain rights upon us. Not many, mind you, but extremely important ones when one goes up against the government or any other authority. Which doesn't happen enough today.
Your thought that our only right is to "obey the state" reminds me of Heinlein's quote from one of his books "The space between the stars does not go to men who have 'no options'." True, some agents of the state have of late acted abysmally, and it's getting very hard to hold them accountable, but the alternative is a complete breakdown in civil society where vigilantism takes precedence, and those who are the least bit different are made scapegoats for every imagined ill. If you think 'outing' on Facebook was bad....
"Oh, I might add, criminalizing nature, a plant, is still patently absurd."
Absurdity is patenting nature. I'm having trouble seeing the criminalization of nature in our current laws, and when I compare this issue to, say, our gun laws which prohibit ownership (not to mention use) of unregistered, unlicenced or prohibited firearms, I don't say that that "manufacturing is criminalized". I recognize it as a necessarily-imperfect restriction on our liberties in order to uphold a greater good. As I'm sure I've mentioned, I'm a great fan of Mill and even Bentham, not to mention Pete Singer.
I wonder if he has anything on marijuana laws? So far, all the arguments made for free consumption of marijuana anytime, anywhere, don't make it for me.
zalm
32 weeks ago
P.rex
You may have gathered that I really don't like the smell of marijuana or the people who smoke it at all. You'd be right.
All I want it the permission to freely discriminate in favour of my bias - in hiring and working with people, in choosing who visits me, and in carrying out regulated activities when out in the public domain, such as driving.
I don't think I'm asking much, and I'm pretty sure I'm being as straight-forward as people who think "grow-ops have very few ventilation and fire problems", or that "it's far less dangerous than prescription drugs or alcohol" without the slightest shred of proof.
Fish-counter
32 weeks ago
Zalm: you have a point
We need a quick roadside test for THC since it impairs driving, and we have a right to choose who we work with. I have worked with chronic cannabis smokers and it can be a mind-f*ck. They are sometimes paranoid and irrational.
I just don't think the cops should be arresting people for growing a non-addictive shrub. It is a waste of time and money to charge folks for that.
igbymac
32 weeks ago
zalm, there is another realm beyond
and that is where the options are beyond the the confines of the manufactured state. Its found in the bedrock of humanity and in the truth found in eternity.
From where I try to observe life, when the "alternative is a complete breakdown in civil society where vigilantism takes precedence" is the default, humanity has a long way back to find itself.
Always a pleasure, nonetheless.
Fish-counter
32 weeks ago
How many Tyee readers smoke the weed?
Come on, folks. Admit it. If you are a toquer, let's get a head-count. I am not.
zalm
32 weeks ago
fish-counter
"I just don't think the cops should be arresting people for growing a non-addictive shrub. It is a waste of time and money to charge folks for that."
Well, I suppose you're quite right about that. Although some here insist that perhaps this is a better way of keeping them out of mischief than their more troublesome predilections, like settling bar or airport disturbances, or pushing over the mentally ill or inadequately-housed on Hastings St.
Since most of what the police produces ends up in our inadequately-funded court system, I'll have to agree that there's better uses of the system's time. Besides, keeping it illegal only seems to put more bread in the mouths of the kids of HAs... ;>)
While we're on the subject of my failings, I don't think much of skateboarders older than high school either.
zalm
32 weeks ago
PS
I apologize for calling you a fucking lunatic over on the other thread.
Bearzerker
32 weeks ago
and the Stupids are still in control...
...all I want is the freedom to decide for myself ...BACK!
If a crime is suppose to be a harm imposed upon another then what I would like to know is how do we classify prohibition as a crime when its something we do to ourselves?
This debate has devolved for far and is now so twisted and bent it leaves me wondering if the Harper government and caucus are ever allowed to read anything not on the approved list!
http://c2cjournal.ca/2009/07/the-price-of-pot-prohibition/
This article was published in 2009, so they must know about it!
which leaves me wondering... do they really listen to voters? if so, why are they so afraid of debating this subject for all to hear and to decide for themselves in a national referendum.
I'm still hoping that someday a real national party will spring up and would just let the people decide this for themselves, simply because politics has been lying about this subject from the beginning.
demotto
32 weeks ago
Wc e can decide
We can decide for ourselves.
Constitution Act, 1982
Fundamental freedoms-- Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(a) freedom of conscience and religion