At Ground Zero for Next Huge Enviro War: Hartley Bay
BC First Nations and green groups vow to stop pipeline connecting tar sands crude with Asia-bound tankers.
Hartley Bay harbour. Photo: Marshall Maher.
Helen Clifton was startled awake near midnight by her granddaughter's shouts. "Grannie, wake up, wake up -- something’s happened to the Queen."
Clifton, still half-dreaming, thought first of England's royal family.
"No, not that queen, Grannie. The men are all running. They're going down to the boats."
The Queen of the North, a passenger ferry traveling 441 nautical kilometres from Prince Rupert to Port Hardy, had just ploughed into Gil Island, scraping paint onto rocks and barnacles. Clifton couldn't believe it. Her tiny First Nations fishing village, literally just around the bend, had long regarded the provincial ferries, with their advanced navigational equipment, as something close to invincible. Now fishermen -- or "menfolk" -- from Hartley Bay sped towards the ferry in small speedboats, drenched by pouring rain and chopping waves.
Clifton, one of the village's elders and a local matriarch, waited for news beside the VHF marine radio in her living room. It crackled. The ferry was sinking fast. It would soon be underwater. The entire village seemed to breathe in at once. "You could have heard a pin drop in this community," Clifton recalls to this visiting reporter.
Nearly four and a half years later, many in Hartley Bay fear that night may have portended their future. Calgary-based Enbridge Inc. proposes to pipeline fossil fuels from Alberta's oil sands to coastal Kitimat, and then ship them on supertankers to hungry energy markets in China and beyond.
The proposal -- now under federal review -- has put Hartley Bay's estimated 180 residents at the ground zero of global economic forces.
Nobody disagrees a tanker crash in British Columbia's treacherous northern waters means environmental catastrophe. But for First Nations communities up and down the coast, the stakes are arguably highest. An oil spill could sever their bonds with the natural world, and drive a way of life extinct.
A growing coalition of First Nations, conservation groups and international photographers has vowed to fight Enbridge with everything it's got. Some within are now framing the struggle as the biggest ever in B.C. environmental history.
'Feed us weiners and baloney?'
By the standards of urban North America, Hartley Bay is about as remote as you can get. The Gitga'at village lies approximately 620 kilometres north of Vancouver and 80 southwest of Kitimat, tucked snugly into a cove at the mouth of the Douglas Channel (satellite map here). No highway or backcountry road connects Hartley Bay to the B.C. interior. Most people take a small ferry -- named the Tsimshian Storm -- from Prince Rupert. The journey is about three and a half hours down the narrow Grenville Channel. On either side, rainforested mountains wrapped by wisps of cloud plunge into gray-blue seas. First Nations youth wearing skateboard shoes smoke cigarettes on the ferry's back platform.
Hartley Bay's breakwater, a fortress-like stack of boulders covered in green algae, shelters battered fishing boats and the odd luxury yacht. Single-family homes -- most vinyl-sided -- spread in a rough semi-circle along the shore. They're connected by a matrix of boardwalks that glisten when it rains. Locals rumble across town on ATVs or covered golf carts.
Whether or not they fish, everybody here is connected intimately to the ocean. Many see it as the life-source of a breathing natural world that bestows black cod, clams, seaweed, Coho salmon, oolichan and other gifts upon those attuned to its rhythms.
Wally Bolton, a 60 year-old First Nations fisherman, sets out early each morning in his aluminum speedboat. He runs a ground-line with 70 to 80 baited hooks deep into the water, returning seven or so hours later to reel it in. Bolton estimates his hauls of halibut and red snapper feed about 15 families, including his own. He also describes grocery runs to Prince Rupert and walking the aisles of Overwaitea for meat and tissue paper. Factory-produced items like pop, chips and chocolate bars arrive twice a week by ferry. When people here say they'd starve if a supertanker crashed off the B.C. coast, they're talking about the spiritual existence of a community.
"What's Enbridge going to do if there's an oil spill?" Bolton asks. "Feed us wieners and baloney?"
Different worlds, one pipeline
Hartley Bay's fate now is linked to forces that already have transformed the distant town of Fort McMurray, the frontier city at the centre of Alberta's oil sands boom. Fort McMurray lies 437 kilometres north of Edmonton, carved from an immense Boreal Forest that spans Canada and Eurasia. Here the northern lights sparkle overtop strip malls, fast-food joints and labyrinthian white-vinyl neighbourhoods.
Oil reserves second only to Saudi Arabia's are turning Canada into a petro super-power. The resource is not easy to extract. Vast open-pit mines give way to sprawling toxic lakes and flame-spewing industrial fortresses only a 30 kilometre drive from Fort McMurray. Other operations burn natural gas to pump steam underground, melting a viscous substance known as bitumen out of deep formations. The fossil resource is cooked at high temperatures and diluted with chemicals before it's ready for shipment on pipelines. Critics such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimate producing and combusting oil sands fuel creates up to 82 per cent more carbon emissions than conventional oil.
It's this energy source that Enbridge hopes to ship past Hartley Bay as early as 2016. Right now, the United States is the resource's only major foreign buyer. By constructing a twin pipeline 1172 kilometres from Bruderheim, Alberta, to the west coast, Enbridge, and the industry behind it, hope to access huge Asian markets. Canada could play one bidder off another. To mandarins in Ottawa and the boardrooms of multinational oil firms, that is an attractive proposition, especially if the U.S. gets serious about climate change policies that might shut down or slow imports from the oil sands.
Enbridge is adamant that supertankers -- double-hulled for extra safety, it stresses -- pose no risk to coastal First Nations communities.
Crews and ships will be assessed by third party agencies, powerful tugboats will guide each shipment and advanced radar systems will protect against any crash, spokesperson Alan Roth told The Tyee. "Enbridge is an extremely responsible company," he said. "They would not be proposing a project unless they felt the safety aspects would be absolutely world standard."
'We've had many, many battles'
Four and a half years ago, listening breathlessly to each crackle from her VHF radio, Helen Clifton received a troubling phone call. Out on the water, Hartley Bay fishermen were now taking Queen of the North passengers in speedboats to the village's cultural centre. Residents had readied coffee, sandwiches and blankets on a moment's notice. But several passenger counts didn't add up right, a local elder told Clifton. The numbers were short. The next day was unlike any other in Hartley Bay's history. Coast guard and RCMP swarmed the town. A helicopter landed in the field outside the school. Police went house to house, asking about two passengers -- "strangers," they said -- who should have been among those in the cultural centre but weren't.
They tacked a big yellow police ribbon across each door they knocked on. "It was just like in a movie," Clifton said.
Hartley Bay held memorial services for Gerald Foisy and Shirley Rosette, both presumed drowned, a year later. Despite exhaustive government consultation, no agreement was ever reached to remove wreckage from the ocean floor. Leaking oil fouled clam beds at Fin Island until just recently. The town fears seawater will one day corrode sunken fuel tanks, polluting its waters further.
Hartley Bay fisherman Wally Bolton displays his halibut catch for the day. Photo: Marshall Maher.
Voiced less explicitly is a sense the whole ordeal exposed Hartley Bay to an outside world far beyond its control. Villagers have always felt at Mother Nature's mercy, but to some extent, they've adjusted to her cycles. During the spring, residents migrate to a seaweed and halibut camp at Kiel. And each autumn they visit the Quaal River for salmon.
Gitga'at culture has been battered long and hard by fur traders, churches, loggers, treaties and fisheries, Clifton said. Under Enbridge's proposal, 220 supertankers would pass annually within view of Hartley Bay. A major oil spill could wipe out whatever culture is left. "We've had many, many battles throughout our history, since as inhabitants we were discovered," Clifton said.
"But the sea is food for our soul. We need that."
'Never a fight like this before'
The past three decades in B.C. have seen major environmental battles. In 1993, more than 800 activists were arrested protesting plans to log old-growth forest on Vancouver Island's Clayoquot Sound. Only years later, another campaign, the Elaho Valley's "War in the Woods," was punctuated by violent scraps with loggers and tree-fort blockades. During the decades-long battle to save the Great Bear Rainforest -- in which Hartley Bay lies -- Greenpeace escorted delegates from the German papermaking and magazine publishing industries through pristine wilderness. A land use agreement finalized only last year between First Nations, enviros and loggers was heralded as a landmark model the world could learn from. $60 million in private foundation money is now committed towards it.
Those battles -- and others -- were globally important, said Bruce Hill, a former logger turned conservationist with a long history in the region. But logging firms, he argues, just don't measure up to oil companies in terms of political or economic clout. Enbridge, one of the country's foremost pipeline operators, got $100 million from anonymous oil producers and Asian funders to help its project through federal reviews.
Hartley Bay playground in front of the town's Emmanuel United Church. Photo: Marshall Maher.
"This is the full weight of Canada as a petro-state," Hill said. "B.C.'s environmental movement has never had a fight like this before."
This March, the Coastal First Nations -- a nine-nation alliance that includes the Gitga'at -- took out a full page ad in The Globe and Mail, declaring no tankers would sail its waters.
Hundreds recently protested in Kitimat and Prince George, where preliminary federal hearings are being held.
These past two weeks, the International League of Conservation Photographers has been traveling the Hartley Bay area. The group, which sponsors some of the world's most renowned visual talent, wants to expose Enbridge's pipeline proposal to a global audience. It's the ILCP's tenth such trip since 2007 to ecosystems threatened by development (others include the Yucatan and B.C.'s Flathead Valley).
"If we don't stand up to Enbridge," said founder and leader Cristina Mittermeier, "we deserve every oil spill we get."
First Nations blockades?
With Hartley Bay getting smaller in the distance, Coastal First Nations director Gerald Amos pilots the Suncrest, a rickety-looking but solid fishing craft, past barnacle-encrusted shorelines and later, the blow-hole mist of a humpback whale. At the stern, long fishing lines trail into the ocean. Amos steers with a classic wooden captain's wheel missing one peg.
To the east opens the mouth of Douglas Channel, shrouded in fog, which, if followed long enough, reaches Kitimat. Then it's a straight push more than 1,000 kilometres through forest and mountain range to Fort McMurray's industrial sprawl. Out west lies the Hecate Strait, separating mainland B.C. from the Queen Charlotte Islands. The waterway, where all foreign-bound supertankers must pass, has recorded waves 30 metres high.
Amos talks boldly about full-on First Nations blockades, should Enbridge's pipeline project get federal approval.
"A lot us have said we're prepared to go to jail," he remarks. One Hartley Bay resident even boasted earlier he'd rather ram his fishing boat into a supertanker than let it pass.
Out on the deck, people begin to shout. A thrashing Coho salmon is reeled on board. Someone bashes its head with a piece of driftwood. It shudders a moment, then turns still in a pool of blood and slime.
"I don't think people get it yet, including some of our own people," Amos said, "what kind of risk we're being asked to take." ![]()




18
Login or register to post comments
samuidave (not verified)
1 year ago
Speaking of the 'Queen'
Helen Clifton is more correct than she may appreciate. After the Glorious Revolution of 1688, Britain was dominated in thought with early liberalism, and a Constitutional Monarchy was installed.
So while liberalism (entailing 'equality among men') was a motivator in dismantling the unjust, hereditary political power of 'queens', it hypocritically overlooked hereditary economic power. For there was little more liberal than a man's right to his property, no?
With such want for clarity of thought, it is not unimaginable that we may one day hear the bells ringing and people sobbing, "Long Live Shell Oil!" Ah, for people do find comfort in the most ridiculous places.
"Political dynasties have disappeared, but economic dynasties survive" ~ Bertrand Russell
alive
1 year ago
It will happen!
Money talks!
Getting Alcan into Kitimat in the first place was an ecological disaster only happening because at the time cheap hydro power from Kemano made the entire project a money maker.
By now they say to hell with making aluminum, just sell the power; proving there is no commitment only profit taking.
The idea of shipping tarsands product via Kitimat is another example of pursuing money regardless of the consequences.
Considering the politicians in power, of course it will happen and for awhile some workers will have well-paying jobs, but only during the construction period; that is considered "priming the pump" of the money-making venture, and reluctantly accepted as an investment cost.
puppyg
1 year ago
Fight the Baloney
"What's Enbridge going to do if there's an oil spill?" Bolton asks. "Feed us wieners and baloney?"
-----------------------------
Mr. Bolton has it right. Quite literally, there is a lot of baloney on the horizon for these kind folk.
I recall, from the early 1980's, interviewing the lawyer for the Lubicon Lake band in Northern Alberta regarding their losing battle to retain some control over their traditional territory that had been licensed by the Alberta Government to oil companies for intensive exploration.
The lawyer explained how poorly the band was adapting to a new life in a dense, poorly serviced community, no longer able to live off the land. The seismic explosions, he told me, had driven away the game that once sustained them. Instead of moose meat in every home, they had to buy food. Every day, for lunch, the kids ate baloney.
There was some incident, perhaps a stunt intended to embarrass the Alberta Government, whereby a US human rights group was appealing for help internationally for the Lubicon band.
I haven't followed the Lubicon story since then, but I am thinking that the people of Hartley Bay might find some solidarity in consulting with the band. How wise they are to see the coming baloney.
Dear people of Hartley Bay, we are with you all the way.
jnewcomb
1 year ago
Bummer - you need oil to live - even in Hartley Bay
Yeah, no easy answers to this one, but obvious that Hartley Bay residents need oil as much as the rest of us, whether for their fishboats, ferries or children's playgrounds. Hypocrisy folks? Probably not in the mind of the author or most of the commenters.
freebear
1 year ago
Only some of those boats
in the 'Headline picture' are wind powered!
Fine to say no tankers (I agree) but 'we' have to give some things up e.g. convenience) in order to kick the oil 'habit'; especially when it is forever 'pushed' at us!
Deity-damn the Pusher Man!
edoherty
1 year ago
Don't need more and more oil, or more freeways
jnewcomb wrote "Hartley Bay residents need oil as much as the rest of us, whether for their fishboats, ferries or children's playgrounds. Hypocrisy folks?"
No, 'we', as in people in cities, can live better with far less oil right now. It would be hypocrisy to only try to stop oil pipelines and tankers and not look at the consumption end. But there is also a lot of campaigning to break our addiction to oil. For example, by shifting public spending from freeways to electric public transit. This is what the mass direct action 10/10/10 Dig in for Climate Justice is about - see www.dig4justice.org
pipeup
1 year ago
Enbridge's pipedream
Enbridge has no idea what they're up against in BC. 80% of British Columbians support a tanker ban for our north coast. None of the investor analysts really think that this is going to go through. All federal political parties except Harpers support a tanker ban. No one has even signed shipper agreements with Enbridge (an unprecedented move for a pipeline company whose filed an application with the NEB).
But above all, the strength and resolve of First Nations and communities who rely on healthy watersheds and a healthy coast for their livelihoods and identity, are incredibly powerful. While the oil and gas industry is undoubtedly the most powerful lobby in the world today, never underestimate the opposition of those who know their land and waters intimately. The risks are too great for this project that will only make a couple of corporations wealthier.
Enbridge should go back to Calgary and feast on their own baloney and drink a cup of Athabasca water to wash it all down.
Skywalker
1 year ago
jnewcomb
So what does exporting tar sands oil to the U.S do for these people who need oil to run their boats. Nothing! It's for export!
canuck
1 year ago
Enbridge instead of telling
Enbridge instead of telling Canadians about their plans to build a pipeline for shipping Alberta's dirty oil through pristine waters, should start reading British Columbia newspapers and the fierce opposition to their plans.
http://floodiceorfire.wordpress.com/stop-enbridge-bp-north-oilsands-northern-pipeline-and-supertankers-to-hell-gateway-into-supernatural-b-c/
Enbridge executives, instead of aboriginal bands, may very well end up eating their own baloney or feasting on crow instead!
RickW
1 year ago
The Spirit of Hartley Bay
When David Hahn nixed calling one of the new ferries The Spirit of Hartley Bay in recognition of the heroic efforts by the residents that just might have saved many lives (think of the lawsuits of that kind of disaster alone, Mr. Hahn), it should have been taken as a sign of things to come.
Birch
1 year ago
Liability
A basic contradiction exists between Enbridge's willingness to promote double-hulled tankers, etc., as absolutely safe ("world-class!") and their unwillingness to take on any liability in the event of a tanker accident carrying their oil.
Given their absolute confidence, one would think they would be ready to abandon the limited liability provisions found in basic corporate charters!
Enbridge cannot realistically offer such assurances, and their unwillingness to take on liability for offshore tanker accidents accentuates their knowledge that this is so.
Aside from tanker threats, which are real and significant, are threats to the projected pipeline itself. A short number of years ago the Copper River Valley (not far from where the pipeline is planned to run) saw a landslide come down one of the valley's mountain walls that contained the matter equivalent to several city blocks worth of downtown Vancouver. Landslides in river valleys are not uncommon, but the pipeline is projected to cross several hundred valleys. Landslides would penetrate a pipeline like buckshot through a straw. Imagine such an event demolishing the pipe on a foggy winter day several dozen miles up a remote valley. Contamination would persist for upwards of a century, if not longer.
Enbridge has its head in the (tar) sand and needs a reality check.
sicntired
1 year ago
It doesn't matter where they want to put their pipe
There's no way this should have ever gotten past the design stage.Enbridge has a terrible record environmentally and the recent disaster in the Gulf should have been enough to turn off even our Mr.12%.I thought there was a moratorium on any and all oil exploration off the west coast.I suppose they get away with claiming this isn't exploration.There was just a ferry run aground right in this very spot.I suppose they sat down and decided that the best place to put a port for filling supertankers was the inside passage.Bloody brilliant.To their credit,some American companies are refusing to buy Tar Sands oil because it's just too filthy and the process by which it is recovered is far too environmentally destructive.They must have missed the TV commercials that tout how beautiful and oh so friendly and clean it all is.They're just not buying what the government of Alberta's selling.Is this the way we thank the native community at Hartley Bay for the assistance they provided and the lives they saved?I guess they can use whatever plaque they were given to bail the oil that will inevitably spill during the loading process.We must see to it that this pipeline does not happen on the West coast.Not in any location.This would be an accident waiting to happen and would be for the benefit of no one but the Amerikans.
Driftwood
1 year ago
Great Article, Geoff
220 tankers a year? Crawling fogblind down a narrow channel to cross the ferry route to Rupert and chance the oft stormy Hecate Strait where just last year the ferry had to turn back from its trip to the Charlottes because the sea was too rough. Throw in all those huge tankers already carrying coal and raw logs out of the Port of Prince Rupert and; as someone said at a council meeting on the Charlottes, 'It's not a question of if, it's a question of when.'
mopled
1 year ago
Ghastly!
And Enbridge has struck out. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/third-pipeline-shutdown-another-blow-to-enbridge/article1706159/
But I think the oil would more likely go to China, than the US, especially since their economy has tanked. Maybe the confirmation of abiotic oil, http://www.viewzone.com/abioticoilx.html
will eventually mean the demise of oceanic shipping,in the meantime we must prevent this disaster-in-waiting.
warbler
1 year ago
Troubling
This is following bit from the article is most troubling:
But logging firms, he argues, just don't measure up to oil companies in terms of political or economic clout. Enbridge, one of the country's foremost pipeline operators, got $100 million from anonymous oil producers and Asian funders to help its project through federal reviews.
We are not talking about a fur company sailing into town and bribing the locals with liquor and blankets, although I suspect some modern equivalent of this is part of the 'anonymous' consortium's PR strategy. Nor are we talking about a big forest company fending off a few roadblock hippies and losing. With peak oil upon us, the desperation among the petro-elite is increasingly apparent, the stakes bigger than a single waterway or a piece of old growth forest. The greenwashing has gotten much better since Clayoquot. Look at the magic BP is now pulling out of its hat in the Gulf: They've capped the leak, and presto... there's suddenly no more oil to be found!
This Enbridge proposal is going to be tough to stop because of the span and influence of big oil's global tentacles, and because of how deep oil is ingrained into our collective post-industrial soul. This is a battle that requires global campaigning, not just local opposition. And as edoherty suggests, opposition needs to include a broad-based commitment by opponents to adopt cleaner, greener modes of transportation.
I want to know how it's possible that $100m in offshore, out-of-province cash has been allowed into the PR coffers of Enbridge in order to "help the process along." This is outrageous and if we had any investigative reporters left within the corporate media, they should be all over this.
morechatter
1 year ago
We need water to Live
Bummer not oil, there is nothing living that requires oil to survive. It is oil companies and car companies that survive on the consumption of oil. And its not about the oil its about transporting the oil through the pipeline to China that is the hot button issue to Asian markets instead of the US. So no market in the US you say, not buying it and neither is the US as why dosen't Canada keep its oil sands resources to itself no need to risk so much. Is it really necessary for Canadians to live? So big old tar sands company wants people to believe US markets taboo so can send oil to China without any tado is more like it.
morechatter
1 year ago
Harper vows to stop exports if you don't come clean
American producers and pipeline companies have been expanding networks to export raw bitumen to the US. Enbrigdge to pipe unprocessed oil to the West Coast. The pipeline would be from Fort Saskatchewan to Kitimat, British Columbia.
Since Feds approved the Sinopec deal, the Chinese have a veto right and it would clear the way to export unprocessed oils sands oil to China for processing. During the last election campaign Prime Minister Harper vowed to stop exports of unprocessed oil to any country where there were lower environmental standards.
RockyRacoon
1 year ago
China standard's are no lower than the US or Canada's
So Harpers issued an empty threat and he knows it. He is banking on we don't.
We all need to be First Nations people here!
Take all issues to the Honour of the Crown-there is no justice here and it will be like that for as long as the sun shines and as long as the grass grows. And for us that might not be to far off.
RR