News

Time to Get 'Wacky' Again: The Northwest Transmission Line

Did Campbell green light an all too familiar boondoggle?

By Christopher Pollon, 21 Sep 2009, TheTyee.ca

abandonedBCrail.jpg

Remains of last boondoggle: abandoned BC Rail grade south of Dease Lake. Photo by C. Pollon.

Related

Driving the deserted Highway 37 south of Dease Lake, a crumbling gravel track runs through a mosquito-infested swamp on the edge of Little Gnat Lake. It is the decaying ruins of BC's last big northern infrastructure project -- a testament to publically-funded optimism and folly, and a forgotten scheme to open up the North.

The year was 1969, and Social Credit Premier W.A.C. Bennett had just embarked on his dream of extending the B.C. Rail line from Fort St. James to Cassiar above Dease Lake. Such infrastructure would help exploit the Northwest's boundless gold, silver, copper and coal, but the vision entailed more than just that. It was the first step of continental integration -- one which would see British Columbia and North America connected to Alaska.

Planning broke down, costs ballooned, and a fiasco ensued. At one point, B.C. Rail began construction of a railway bridge at the confluence of the Stikine and Klappan Rivers that would be flooded under hundreds of metres of water by a simultaneous B.C. Hydro plan to dam the Stikine. A scathing Royal Commission was struck to investigate the boondoggle, and hundreds of kilometres of groomed right-of-way -- without a single metre of track laid -- was left to return to nature across the wild Stikine watershed.

Fast-forward more than 30 years: on Sept. 16, Stephen Harper announced that the federal government would invest $130 million to extend the electrical grid far into the northwest of B.C., restating Bennett's intention to connect B.C. to Alaska. With the past forgotten and a single gesture of taxpayer-funded largesse, the elusive dream of opening the North to industrial development was back on.

Government ready to go it alone

Up until last week, the Northwest Transmission Line (NTL) was facing grave uncertainty. The NTL was originally conceived to accompany the ill-fated Galore Creek mine north-east of Stewart; the plan, including the grid extension, was abandoned in 2007 when development costs spiralled out of control.

Premier Gordon Campbell revived the NTL, which was planned to connect Bob Quinn Lake to the existing grid terminus at Meziadin Junction, in September of 2008 -- with a provincial investment of $10 million to kick-start the environmental assessment (EA) process. At the time, Campbell justified the expenditure based on a private lobby group's report that projected the line would generate $15 billion investment dollars and 10,000 jobs. No clear timeline for such benefits was put forward.

The crash of economy and commodity prices saw private mining and energy companies increasingly reluctant to commit funds to the $250 million the province had already pledged -- a major stumbling block to building the line, or so it seemed. Reached by phone the day of the announcement last week, B.C.'s Minister of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Blair Lekstrom confirmed the project would move forward, and that the province was prepared to go it alone.

"We made it clear, once we reached this agreement (for federal money) we will move forward on this project," he said.

The plan now is to move forward quickly -- Lekstrom said an application to the B.C. environmental assessment office will be made this fall, possibly to be completed within 180 days. Ground could be broken as early as next year, with a fully operational 287 kilovolt (KV) transmission line in place by 2012.

'Cleaner, greener energy' appears to be a myth

Once fully operational, what exactly would a 287 KV line be used for? The answer was unclear in Harper's announcement, which positioned the federal investment and the line itself as a boon to the environment.

"Our government is supporting environmentally-sound infrastructure and initiatives that promote cleaner, greener energy," said the prime minister in a press release. "The Northwest Transmission Line will facilitate the development of green energy and help provide British Columbia's northern and remote communities with more sustainable and affordable power."

Despite what was said, the province confirmed last November that the NTL, as currently planned, will not take a single northern community off diesel power. At present, Dease Lake has its own small hydro plant with diesel back-up, and Iskut burns diesel and pays subsidized rates comparable to grid power. Telegraph Creek -- located hundreds of kilometres north of Bob Quinn and at least 90 kilometres east of the Highway 37 itself -- would require its own massive infrastructure project to get off diesel. Stewart, meanwhile, is already connected to the grid.

In terms of energy development, the northwest accounts for only about 12 per cent of the province’s estimated run-of-river hydro potential, including the Forest Kerr run of river hydro project on the Iskut River, the largest planned IPP in the province at nearly 200 MW capacity. It is the only regional energy project likely to come into production any time soon.

Steve Davis, the president of the Independent Power Producers Association of B.C., says there is excellent potential to develop run-of-river and wind resources in the Northwest, but the great distance from demand centres is currently a barrier to development.

"The Northwest is very far from the load center where most of the electricity consumers live," says Davis. "The ideal place to generate an electron is right beside the house that is going to use it. The northwest is the furthest away [location for power generation] in the province."

Mining: the NTL's primary beneficiary

What is likely to come into development sooner are a number of open-pit copper mines and at least one coal mine in the Stikine watershed, as environmentalists were quick to point out after the prime minister's announcement.

"Stephen Harper is trying to greenwash a project that has more to do with stimulating major mining projects than it does with bringing 'green energy' to northwest communities," said Merran Smith, climate director with Forest Ethics on Sept. 18. "This transmission line is anything but green."

Major mining projects include the Mount Klappan coal mine at the head of the Klappan River, proposed by Ontario-based Fortune Minerals. The nearby Red Chris open-pit copper mine near Iskut, being planned by Imperial Metals Corporation of Vancouver, is another of the closest mines to becoming a reality, and one that needs grid power to be economically viable. Red Chris is currently stalled amid a legal action initiated by Mining Watch Canada, which should be resolved by early 2010.

And then there are the Tahltan First Nations, centred around three northwest communities claiming about 150,000 km of mineral rich land, including much of the Stikine River watershed. They are currently divided on how wind, copper, coal and coalbed methane should proceed on their land -- particularly in the ecologically fragile area encompassing the collective headwaters of the Skeena, Stikine and Nass rivers.

'Nobody knows the future': mining exec

If there is anything certain about mining, it is its inherent uncertainty. Brian Kynoch, president of Imperial Metals Corporation, concedes as much when talking about the task of developing mines. "One day you've got a viable project, the other day you don't -- that's the business we're in," he said in August from his Imperial Metals headquarters on Hornby Street. "At the end of the day, huge sums of money are invested on assumptions about prices, what the exchange rate [is], what the costs are going forward, and that's doing business, right? Nobody knows the future, and if you did, why would you get involved in mining?"

By extension, the planning of infrastructure to fuel such ventures must confront an equal amount of uncertainty. To move forward with the NTL, the province is now required to take a massive, W.A.C. Bennett-inspired leap of faith. Last September confirmed this, when the province revived the NTL based on optimistic statistics generated not by government, but by a coalition of community and industry boosters initiated by mining interests.

The neglect of rigorous government planning for the NTL -- including the absence of any mechanism to sustainably pace the development of resources -- worries northwesterners like James Bourquin of Iskut, who lived through a botched plan to dam the Stikine, and later, the B.C. Rail extension as well. He says the B.C. Rail misadventure in particular should be viewed by government and taxpayers as a cautionary tale.

"It seems like history is repeating itself, except now it's a transmission line," says the U.S.-born conservationist and rafting guide. "If the government builds the power line in tough economic times, and the copper industry doesn't come, and the IPPs (independent power producers) are slow to come, then it will be just like the 1970s all over again."  [Tyee]

11  Comments:

  • Grumpy

    21-09-2009

    Canadian politicians love boondoggles..............

    ...............it keeps the taxpayers entertained.

  • Barryeng

    21-09-2009

    Don't get me wrong!

    I am in full favour of the Northern Transmission Line, and I think that sooner or later it should end up in Whitehorse or points west of there. However, I am sure that the "green" reasons for building the line are just as mouldy as a piece of fruit left too long on my counter. If Rafe and the Run-of-the-river opponents take a good look at this power line it will become obvious that Plutonic Power will benefit far more than the residents of Iskut.

    Sure, there are potential mines, and sure there are communities, but there are a lot more Liberal supporting IPP's in that area than either one. Build the line, but please don't try to snow us on the reasons why.

  • Ncoastmtn

    21-09-2009

    Not like the Seventies at all

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper's recent announcement at press conference in Washington DC with President Obama described a potential Alaska Transmission interconnection to the proposed Northwest Transmission Line. Besides this obvious omission from the above story, there also seems to be some more significant pertinent information missing.

    The difference between a rail connection between Alaska and a transmission line to Alaska is (unlike the rail line) there is a basis; a very good and green one for a transmission interconnection to Alaska.

    The Alaska Panhandle has over 10,000 megawatts of benign low impact, alpine lake tap generation potential alone. And there have been cooperative efforts and discussions between Canadian First Nations and Alaska First Nations because much of the renewable energy in either region will be owned and controlled by First Nation's. There will be a significant benefit to the First People and these benefits will be passed on to their children's children. At the outset, these renewable energy benefits appear highly compatible with the goals of sustainability which is what is being sought by all.

    Here is what will be developed by various First Nations being examined is wind energy potential, geothermal and biomass potential in this part of BC and these resources if developed will be gathered in perpetuity by these same people. In the Alaska Panhandle besides the same and previous resources mentioned, there is tidal and wave energy to potentially harvest - if determined harmless to Native food sources. Also being considered is algae production for biofuels and wood byproducts needed for biofuel production and the local production of activated charcoal for water purification.

    So this transmission line proposal is much more than the old boom and bust cycle that typically is associated with development in the Northwest BC region. It is a step away by First Nations from dependence upon government and special interest groups. It will also be an authentic delivery on renewable green energy for Canada and North America. This is something which environmentalists and their groups should of course examine with a skeptical eye. And if proven beneficial, they should embrace for the positive solutions that it delivers in efforts to cut green house gas emissions.

  • Skywalker

    21-09-2009

    Really nothing more than a sop to IPPs

    You open up a vast area, the First Nations will need the IPP interests to access any ROR projects. We'll be paying more for hydo just so the IPP interests can make some easy mony.

  • seth

    21-09-2009

    waste of money

    We are already squandering treasure at six times the cost of nuclear power on these silly "renewables" destroying thousands of sq miles of river, ocean, and forest that don't have a chance in hell of pulling us back from the global warming peak oil precipice that may hit us in less than 10 years.

    BCHydro has already spend $31 billion buying us 7000 miserable gwh's of sometimes available wind and river power, doubling our power rates by 2013. With Alberta and Saskatchewan using up a few acres building nukes at a $24 billion for 25000 gwhr of baseload 24/7 power (Ontario Hydro's recent Areva quote), only an idiot would expect us to have any industry left in the province ten years from now.

    The world needs to be building baseload power plant at a rate of 1 gigawatt a day for the next 30 years if we are to survive peak oil and the climate precipice. This can only be achieved with cheap clean and green mass produced nuclear power payed for by eliminating the world's crude oil consumption. BC's share is 15 gigawatts.

    Wasting time and treasure on power lines to nowhere will be viewed by future generations as the dying gasp of a very foolish culture.

  • Soc

    21-09-2009

    Recently, I used the

    Recently, I used the remnants of the old BC Railgrade to return from a hiking trip in the Spatsizi Plateau. On the way out, me and my girlfriend were picked up by a gentleman returning from a pack-trip into the headwaters of the Stikine. He was showing his grandchildren the trickle-like source that was the livelihood of his people for generations. Royal Dutch Shell wants to turn this area, collectively known as the "sacred headwaters," into a coalbed methane gas field. Although they have been met by blockades by local elders, the preservation of this spectacular and sacred land is not assured. Meanwhile, the gains from developing this area are uncertain, both financially, socially, and environmentally. Is this the type of development the government hopes to promote? If so, I am deeply disturbed. There should be no development of the NTL without sound motives; fiscally, socially, and environmentally.

  • Ann James

    22-09-2009

    Barryeng, what's Plutonic Power got to do with NWT line?

    Barry, do your homework so you can provide fair comment. Here's map pf propsoed NWT line routes: http://www.llbc.leg.bc.ca/public/PubDocs/bcdocs/426052/FINAL.pdf

    Plutonic's projects are on the Sunshine Coast not in the Northwest, so what's Plutonic got to do with anything other than being the whipping boy for the industry? Given several members of my family are working right now at Plutonic's camp instead of on EI because of forestry downturn, I'm a bit offended by you spreading misinformation.

  • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.