News

Huge 'Green' Boondoggle?

Critics claim $300 million will be wasted on BC 'clean energy' project.

By Tom Barrett, 26 Apr 2007, TheTyee.ca

Highway 37 Sign


Plan to electrify highway

The provincial government says a massive project to connect a stretch of northwestern B.C. to the North American power grid is a green initiative.

But if the aim of the project is really to fight climate change, an environmental group says it knows a way it could save the province hundreds of millions of dollars.

In March, Prime Minister Stephen Harper gave B.C. $199.3 million to cut pollution and greenhouse gases. One of the projects earmarked for possible funding, Harper said, was a plan to extend the power grid to communities near the Alaska panhandle, currently powered by "dirty diesel."

The Highway 37 electrification project, as it's known, has been on the drawing board for years. It's still in the proposal stage, although its backers are lobbying the government vigorously and the province seems open to the project.

But calculations by the Dogwood Initiative suggest that the government could get the area off diesel for $22 million or less -- as opposed to the $326 million cost of hooking the area up to the grid.

The extra $300 million or so is only necessary if the government intends to open the area up to mining, the environmental organization claims.

'Way better alternatives'

"It's a complete scam," says Dogwood Initiative executive director Will Horter. "If the purpose of the power line is to get these people off diesel, there's way better alternatives."

"If the purpose is to pretend that you're doing something green while you're basically building a power line that opens the whole northern province up to oil and gas and mining and coal development and you can get away with that, then fine."

The approximately 650 households in the area currently powered by diesel would use less than half of one per cent of the power line's capacity, Horter said.

Highway 37 runs through the heart of what mining promoters call B.C.'s "Golden Triangle." The area is said to abound in copper and gold. There are also deposits of coal -- not the greenest fuel around, admittedly.

"A dozen mineral properties at various stages of exploration and development are located within 160 km or so of the proposed power grid extension," says a brief prepared in 2005 by the Northwest Powerline Coalition, an industry-led group supporting development of the area.

"In order to be economically viable, these projects require access to electricity at the same rates charged to large industrial users throughout the rest of the province," the document states.

Promise of jobs, investment

The coalition argues that opening the area up to mining will create 10,000 direct and indirect jobs and will spur $3 billion in private-sector investment.

All that, the coalition says, in exchange for a public-sector investment that would be less than the cost of the new Vancouver Convention Centre.

"These developments will nurture, grow and support healthy economic activity in the region and create thousands of new, long-term, sustainable, high-paying jobs in an area populated predominantly by First Nations peoples," the coalition promises. "This will enhance existing, and create new sources of revenue for the B.C. government through an increased business tax base [and] a higher and expanded personal tax base and improve the working relationship with the First Nations community as they move towards self-sufficiency and self-government."

However, says Horter, no one in government is looking at the potential social and environmental costs of such massive development.

"This is probably the largest industrial development scheme that'll happen in B.C. in my lifetime," Horter said. "And it's happening with no conversation and no public discussion -- no nothing.

"It's all happening in secret."

Mining 'can make a killing'

The only time the electrification project received any wide scale publicity, Horter said, was in March, when the prime minister came to B.C. to hand over the Canada ecoTrust money.

At the time, Harper said the money was designed to "finance projects that will advance the development of clean energy and directly reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions." These were, he said, "environmental initiatives that will make real, measurable contributions to reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions."

Besides the money for electrifying Highway 37, the ecoTrust money is aimed at promoting such things as fuel cells, geothermal energy and bio-energy. The province hasn't yet determined how much each project will receive.

In accepting Harper's cheque, Premier Gordon Campbell linked the projects to climate change, saying they will "result in real reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants."

Electrification of Highway 37, he suggested, is part of B.C.'s global warming strategy.

To Horter, however, the project looks more like a handout to government supporters.

Mining companies, which donated $1.5 million to Campbell's Liberal party over the past decade, "can really make a killing if they get the government to pay all their [electricity] costs," Horter said. "Their biggest cost is power."

Jake Jacobs, a spokesman for the B.C. energy ministry, said in an e-mail that Hydro has looked at using small hydro as a replacement for diesel in various communities.

"In fact, the Energy Plan 2007 includes a policy action directing B.C. Hydro to consider alternative energy and energy efficiency when it is looking at how best to serve remote communities," Jacobs said.

He added that "the availability of transmission infrastructure will facilitate the development of renewable electricity generation in the area generally" and that "the province is committed to support the development of clean, efficient energy supplies and energy conservation projects for First Nations and remote communities."

'Micro-hydro' far cheaper

To calculate how much it would cost taxpayers to get the Highway 37 communities off dirty diesel, Dogwood Initiative volunteer Gaza Vamos, an engineer, worked out two scenarios.

Both involve building micro-hydro projects, also known as run-of-the-river power, on the area's streams.

The numbers, Vamos said, are approximate, "but they give you the picture."

Under the first scenario, based on B.C. Hydro data, all the households currently on diesel could be served at their current levels of energy consumption by micro-hydro for $22 million, said Vamos, who is also a director of the B.C. Sustainable Energy Association.

Under Vamos's second scenario, power consumption could be cut by 70 per cent and the cost of providing micro-hydro to the area would drop to about $11 million.

That includes spending $5,000 per household to give new, energy-efficient appliances to everybody in the area.

Horter acknowledged that there are some environmental downsides associated with micro-hydro, but added that these problems usually arise when larger projects are passed off as being micro in scale.

"It all kind of comes back to: Is it truly micro-hydro or is it a big project that they're trying to pretend is micro-hydro?" he said.

Given the tiny communities along Highway 37, Horter said, very small-scale alternative energy projects should be sufficient.

"There's lots of alternatives for powering them compared to massive power lines," he said.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

33  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • mopled

    5 years ago

    Everything will be greenwashed

    Here are the plans for the chicken house the foxes are planning. We are getting continental planning.
    North American Future Project 2025
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=COU20070501&articleId=5469

    Bill 30 was introduced April 23.
    http://www.leg.bc.ca/38th3rd/1st_read/gov30-1.htm
    Finance Statutes (Innovative Clean Energy Fund) Amendment Act, 2007

  • SaveOurRivers

    5 years ago

    BC Hydro privatization is public ruin

    BC Hydro has pumped an average $700 million a year into BC general revenue for the past 10 years. This money went into everything from hospitals to schools to road work. What will happen when this cash flow greatly reduces or even stops because all the money (which will increase as time goes by) goes into a few private hands? How much will this impoverish BC? Will we be able to compete on the world market with the likes of California when all electricity will only be sold to the highest bidders? Can small businesses survive a 5 or 6-fold increase in electric prices? Can you?
    Check out hydrofactsbc.ca and ourrivers.ca for more info.
    Here's a presentation by adjunct Professor John Calvert of Simon Fraser University on BC Hydro privatization:
    Viewing Tip: Once the video begins, you can click on the "scrollable" table of contents chapter index (works exactly like a "scenes" menu in a DVD). This clickable index is just underneath the video player. The video will then jump to that point in the presentation. (If you've got "Flash" player loaded and enabled, you can also navigate via "clicking" on the moving "timeline" at the bottom of the presentation screen.)
    (Note: the hyperlink address strings that are visible on this web page here are *not* the full address shown, but they will work here, if you click on a link here. If you want to send these links to others, privately, then please remember to copy the *full* shortcut address path.)
    For "Windows" viewers using "Internet Explorer":
    Click Here to play
    For "Windows" viewers using "Firefox" (requires "Real Media Player" or "Real alternative" v1.51 player..google it.):
    Click Here to play
    For "Windows" viewers using "Firefox", that also have "QuickTime" loaded (broadband only):
    Click Here to play
    For "Mac" viewers running "OS X" (this presentation can can *only* be viewed via "Firefox" browser for Mac OS X. "Safari" browser is not supported).
    (broadband only):
    Click Here to play
    For "Mac" viewers running "OS X", and "Linux" users with "Firefox" browser for Linux (with a player that plays Real Media streams on Linux), and are on dialup modems or broadband (can *only* be viewed via "Firefox" browser for Mac OS X. "Safari" browser is not supported. Requires "Real Media Player" for Mac OS X to get dialup modem support):
    Click Here to play

  • IAMC

    5 years ago

    copper-gold-coal

    Enough commodities in a given area, coupled to a supportive government and business community, can bring riches and security, to an area formally not in the cross hairs of the urban liberal.
    It's not something to get upset about. The urban libs have power, Internet, cable, infrastructure, transit system, parks, garbage pickup, recycling pickup, police, fire dept., courts, major medical facilities, shopping opportunities, supplies, taxi cabs, pizza delivery, airports, railways, highways, passport offices, EI office, CRA office, major newspapers, need I go on.
    For the urban lib to ask rural people to pay the price for their indulgences, is a sin.
    It's the same as the west treats Africa.
    This article was predictable by the headline. It's another eco-fraud example of how the rural people are screwed by the holier than thou, creme de le creme, in Vancouver, who are so rich in property, they don't care about anything outside Vancouver.

  • SaveOurRivers

    5 years ago

    "riches and security..."

    Once a power plant is built (usually within 12 to 18 months) it requires 1 or 2 workers to keep it going. How is this going to bring "riches and security" to the area devastated by the power facility, it's water-feed channel construction and transmission corridor making? Once any of the natural beauty of the area is blasted to smithereens (or cut down for transmission towers) what hope is there for any tourist or research business?

  • IAMC

    5 years ago

    off topic save'

    There are no plans to build a 'POWER PLANT " in this area of discussion. It;s merely a plan to send up a proper transmission line to get sufficient power to the area.
    The construction of this line will involve hundreds of high paying jobs.
    Once built, it will allow the area to create infrastructure to serve the deserving people.
    Save Our Rivers probably lives in Surrey, wired into everything possible in Vancouver.
    Why should rural BC to be subject to enabling themselves to tourist or research dollars to get them by?
    Who made you the arbitrator of wealth creation?

  • cghzd

    5 years ago

    bc hydro

    Its amazing how most British Columbians are sitting on thier hands watching Gordo and the rest of the Liberal slimballs sell bc hydro to thier friends and political contributors.

    Where are the NDP? The should be telling these so called free enterprisers to be very carefull. Give these guys something to really think about by telling them that when the NDP get back in {and they will soon thanks to Virk and Basi) that the people of BC will either tax every inch of their sleasy operations or expropiate them for a hell of alot less that they paid for them. Hydro must be kept in the public domain along with water and healthcare.

  • Grumpy

    5 years ago

    The big give away!

    This is how Gordo and his crew operate > donate to the Liberal Party of BC and the government will spend taxpayers dollars to subsidies their business ventures.

    RAV, Gateway, Sea to Sky, BC Ferries, Hydro, it's all the same.

    Campbell will go down in history as the most evil Premier this province has seen and the media said nothing!

  • DJT

    5 years ago

    For an interesting read,

    For an interesting read, check out the business section of the Province today re: "Ratepayers to bear energy plan's cost". The only surprising thing about it (to those without their heads in the sand or whose bread is buttered by our provincial "reverse Robin Hood" government) is that it was actually published in the Province.

  • seanorr

    5 years ago

    Scammers

    When going green is driven by green.

  • Grumpy

    5 years ago

    Maybe the Asper Press is feeling the heat

    It is my understanding that the Asper Press is feeling their customer's wrath over their censorship of Liberal evil-doings?

    If the number of people phoning me, asking me to subscribe to the Sun or Province is any indication (3 just last week!) they are desperate for new subscribers!

    Maybe Teflon Gordo, is Teflon no more?

  • Skywalker

    5 years ago

    So what else is new

    The $300 million will come out of the pockets of the average person to subsidize the poor mining companies investments and profit margins. It is all so familiar in B.C. where the rich corporations need to have their hand in the taxpayer's pocket.

  • BC Mary

    5 years ago

    Now is the time for all good persons to come to the aid

    Now is the time for all good persons to come to the aid of their province.

    cghzd wrote:
    Its amazing how most British Columbians are sitting on thier hands watching Gordo and the rest of the Liberal slimballs sell bc hydro to thier friends and political contributors. Where are the NDP?

    Just wondering, cghzd, if you've been supporting the NDP the past few years?

    Are you upporting Save Our Rivers?

    It's warm words we need: show us how it's done. You're absolutely correct when you say that British Columbians haven't done enough to stop the giveaways.

    But when you think of the huge, complex job that would be ... it's just not right to blame us for not getting it done. Crumbs, we're lucky if we can even find out (after reading or watching or listening to CanWest media) what the basic problems are.

    Please don't blame us. Help us. OK?

  • BC Mary

    5 years ago

    Can we charge CanWest with treason?

    Grumpy:

    CanWest headquarters feeling the heat? Sure hope you're correct on that. I think CanWest should be charged with treason, sneaking into our lives like the Town Crier, but twisting, changing, ignoring, disguising the real news until it's too late.

    Then telling us that everything is wonderful, don't worry, be happy. Isn't that treason?

    If they are feeling the heat right now, it would be such a blessing.

    Imagine: picking up a Vancouver daily newspaper and actually reading the news!

  • Martin

    5 years ago

    Positive Development

    If mining is done in a responsible, environmental way, then it is a tremendous boon to our economy and people (including the local First Nations who deserve a share of the benefits as well.)

    If a new power line is able to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, and also encourages economic development in the area, then everyone benefits.

    For working people, mining is the best-paying industry in a technical field. And (lefties please note) the rate of unionization in the industry is close to 100%. Income taxes and royalties pay for many of the social services we now expect from government.

    Let's get on with it.

  • Skywalker

    5 years ago

    So!

    Let the mining companies pay for the infrastructure they need.

  • kootenay

    5 years ago

    Don't Squander our Money

    This story is about our Provincial Government squandering our tax dollars, that have been specifically designated to cut Green House Gases, to connect the NE corner of the province to the grid.

    The dirty energy currently being consumed can be replaced with green energy at a cost of $22million, as opposed to spending $326million to hook up to the grid.

    It might be necessary to mine that region of the province someday, but what's the hurry? The economy is strong now, why must we develop everything now, how about saving something for a rainy day, and spending the money for its intended purpose.

  • IAMC

    5 years ago

    stupid people?

    We are not stupid. The posters on this thread seem to think that mainstream media ( MSM ) is oh so powerful. That the unwashed masses live and die with the information they get through MSM.
    First of all, the majority of people don't care a rat's ass about current events.
    Those that do, have access to alternatives to the liberal MSM.
    20 million Americans listen to Rush Limbaugh every day. This is a huge audience. Massive. And the MSM can't get him fired, like Imus, because he owns himself an all rights to himself. He's untouchable, unless the FCC tries to take him off the air.
    Good luck with that.
    You all can tune into Real Clear Politics, National Review Online, Sean Hannity, Drudge, Captains Quarters, I could list hundreds of alternative news reports to the liberal MSM.
    It's a liberal MSM, and yet the BC Mary's of this world try to deny this.
    MSM ( CNN,CBC,CBS,NBC,ABC,PBS, NPR ) are shrills for everything leftist liberal. Give me a break, do you not know we have figured that out by now?
    So go ahead BC Mary with your assault on Canwest Global and other left wing MSM.
    I love anything that can bring these BS artists down.

  • Burgess

    5 years ago

    Mines - who needs them?

    For the supporters of the mining industry is there one mine anywhere in the world that at the end of its 'life' has not left the taxpayer or local inhabitants with the cleanup bills or worse? Seems the mine Boards can't wait to declare bankruptcy and 'walk' with the 'assets' and 'petty' cash. It seems every closed mine I have ever read about has left the taxpayers with the final cleanup costs which in many cases were/are higher than the value of the ore recovered. Howe Sound and the taxpayer are still paying the environmental costs of the Brittania Copper mine. Montana is a classic example for anyone who cares to research how the mining industry was a disaster for that State. (Read Collapse by Jared Diamond)
    No mine should ever open without the shareholders posting a bond of a billion or so. But it is easier to BS the population with what a great thing the mines will be for the economy. And the money that passes under or over the table to the political parties that are in bed with the mine promoters and their minions just corrupts the political process of public protection. If mining was done with exploration, mining and cleanup costs all factored into the business great but that is not what happens in the real world, in the real world it is how much can the exploiters get while shifting as much expense as possible to the environment and the taxpayer. Now we have a little insight as to why Alcan has cut back its production lines in Kitimat it wants into the power selling business. Looks like they have the inside track on Highway 37 electrification. (And it will be expensive power as well) In order to sell the power they ignore the parts of the original Alcan/BC contract that they don't like and with the connivance of the P3 crazy bunch in Victoria they pull the rug and good paying jobs out from under Kitimat and British Columbia. And what for? Some measly campaign donations, future directorships or what?

  • skeptikool

    5 years ago

    It seems, we exist to be milked

    Except for those in particular businesses, we all welcome alternatives to fossil fuels and nuclear power.

    If one is able to attach a green label to an "alternative" project, no matter the cost, there will be those who will take it as a license to take the consumer to the cleaners.

    A prime example is Sarnia's proposed, million-panel, solar farm covering the equivalent of 419 Canadian football fields and producing a measly 40 megawatts at an estimated cost of over $300 million and delivering power at seven times the current price - and at an agreed price that will have the contractor laughing all the way to the bank for deal's 20 years:

    http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=b1e7a7cc-09ef-439c-8b

  • skeptikool

    5 years ago

    Tested and found wanting

    I'm sorry, but the link I posted in my previous post doesn't open.

    If you wish to read the story, I suggest you Google Vancouver Sun, then check Headline Scan.

  • BC Dude

    5 years ago

    You back again

    You back again IAMCluless?
    Still with the mentality of a paid shill!
    A spoiled little boy who never has anything intelligent to say about the current topic, and a potty mouth just to prove my point.
    Always attacking Great blogger who see out side "The Box" BC Mary is one who has faithfully followed this made man, criminal Gordon Campbell re BC Rail scandal since day one! http://bctrialofbasi-virk.blogspot.com/,
    24hrs paper Bill Tieleman http://billtieleman.blogspot.com/
    http://houseofinfamy.blogspot.com/
    http://www.vivelecanada.ca/index.php?topic=robinscolumn!
    CantWest Media Global owned, bought and paid for by greedy Corporations!
    Maybe you haven't noticed in the local CTV, CBC, Global News nothing at all about the BC Fiberal Scandals? If these are your sources of information, you are living proof of someone who is "living in the box"

  • BC Dude

    5 years ago

    When Campbell and his whole

    When Campbell and his whole crime family including CanWest media as an accessory, aiding and abetting to these crimes get thrown out of "OUR" HOUSES OF PARLAMENT and into prison I'll go out and dance on the streets with a big sign "Free at Last" with Traitor written across gordo's mug shot"!

  • BC Dude

    5 years ago

  • Skywalker

    5 years ago

    When you want to connect to hydro...

    If you live a mile down the road from the closest hydro pole guess who gets to pay for the cost of the extension to your property? That's right you do and so why not let the mining folks pay their own way.

  • DJT

    5 years ago

    CanWest Global left wing???

    IAMC Quote: "Canwest Global and other left wing MSM". Hello? CanWest Global is left wing? What planet do you live on, IAMC?

  • Yeoman

    5 years ago

    Two observations: Its funny

    Two observations: Its funny how pundits like IAMC always call the MSM left while the left calls them right. They are actually both correct because the MSM is socially left but economically right. Why not just agree on this and skip the debate? Secondly, it always cracks me up how IAMC and his (assuming male)ilk cry free market yet will support a $300 million handout to the corporations as "rural development"

  • skeptikool

    5 years ago

    It need not be "dirty" diesel

    Quote:
    One of the projects earmarked for possible funding, Harper said, was a plan to extend the power grid to communities near the Alaska panhandle, currently powered by "dirty diesel."

    I question the reference to "dirty diesel". If the diesel generators currently providing electricity are not using the cleanest diesel fuel available, they should be - and I suspect that they are. Today's diesel fuel is very much cleaner than that generally used as little as ten years ago.

    A previous poster was correct. Producing the power close to its area of intended use is the most desirable. This saves much energy that would otherwise be lost in transmission.

    Naturally, the greener the methods of producing the power, the better.

  • alive

    5 years ago

    Why are we in a hurry?

    Quote:
    If a new power line is able to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, and also encourages economic development in the area, then everyone benefits.

    Reminds me of the talk before the province gave ALCAN the privileges it still enjoys today!

    Looking back it is clear that ALCAN is making huge profits and the province was left holding the bag!

    Can that not be a lesson?

    Why should, we the taxpayers, suffer because maybe some construction jobs may be created?

    If there is a profit to be made the entrepenours will ante up whatever money it takes, but of course they would prefer that taxpayers do it instead!

    Another point is that there are future generations to consider: do we need to plunder everything right now?

    If minerals are so prescious, then they will be even more prescious a generation from now!

    Let the stuff wait in the ground, who knows, maybe they even find better methods of mining it by then?

  • RickW

    5 years ago

    Yeoman

    Quote:
    it always cracks me up how IAMC and his (assuming male)ilk cry free market yet will support a $300 million handout to the corporations as "rural development"

    Likewise with the whole concept of publicly-funded roads, sewage, gas, and other infrastructure, which then (with a wave of the wand) should be turned over to private enterprise. Why don't private entrepreneurs raise the capital, and do the construction themselves? Additionally, with items such as infrastructure, in a true free market the consumer should be able to pick and choose, and compare the services, and not be held to ransom by a monopoly. Why should I (for instance) be compelled to subscribe to Shaw Cable? Or Teresen gas? Or Telus for my phone service? Monopolies are (or should be) anathema to free enterprise. But most so-called "free enterprisers" lust after monopolies -- because in the end of it all, they don't want to have to go through the grind of competing in business day after day with no assurances other than their own competence -- even as they subject their employees to that very same uncertainty with job security, and their customers with intermittant service and completely random price hikes.

  • ov

    5 years ago

    But corporate welfare trickles down!!

    I'm tired of getting trickled on, I think we should hand out all the money to the poor at the bottom, they can then execute the "piss up theory" where the rich can keep whatever money gets thrown their way. At least when you give the money to the poor you know that almost a hundred percent of that money is going to get spent inside the province, and that very very little of it will be squirreled away in offshore bank accounts.

    I wonder what percentage of the electricity on this line will be used in grow houses. BC Bud is our number one industry so perhaps its not unrealistic for the government to subsidize it.

  • Budd Campbell

    5 years ago

    WHAT'S THE VOLTAGE?

    Is this transmission line going to be a 500KV mainline? If so, the real purpose has nothing to do with mining or micro-hydro. It has to do with harnessing the Iskut and Stikine Rivers as the next big inputs into the hydro system.

  • seymour

    5 years ago

    electrification

    BC Hydro or the gov't has absolutely no interest in electrifying communities that are off the grid. They make a few feeble attempts now and again, but it's largely just something to make themselves feel better. And, believe me, I know, as I live in a remote community with "dirty" electrical generation.
    So, where there's smoke there's mirrors......and diesel and gas generators.

  • willy

    5 years ago

    Alaska

    Something that has been missed is that Alaska is very interested in haveing a line down to the lower 48 to ship power. They have a lot of hydro electric potential they would like to develope. So maybe Alaska could pay a good portion of the cost.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.