News

Inquest Families Still Seek Closure

Relatives of Sullivan Mine victims want better answers, stronger penalties from Mines Ministry.

By Francis Plourde, 18 Jul 2008, TheTyee.ca

Shawn Currier and Kim Weitzel

Shawn Currier and Kim Weitzel.

A year ago last spring, two Teck Cominco employees and two paramedics perished in what is known as a confined-space accident.

And a year ago this month, family members of the four people killed in the Sullivan Mine accident left the city of Kimberley's Centennial Hall after several days of hearings that they said were at times draining and painful, but at other times satisfying to witness. Throughout the week of July 9, 2007, the families heard about how bad luck, poor communication and inappropriate safety policies resulted in the death of their loved ones.

After the hearings, as a spokesperson for the other families, George Weitzel, whose wife, Kim Weitzel perished in the accident, said that the coroner's inquest was a welcome step, but that the families would not get closure until significant changes were made to mining regulations in B.C.

Today, Weitzel acknowledges that the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources has made several of the changes proposed by the coroner's inquest jurors, especially in the way inspections are done. But he says unless the ministry follows through on another of the jurors' recommendations -- fines for rule violations -- that those new rules won't be effective. Because of that, and because he says the ministry has failed to communicate well with the families, the families remain dissatisfied.

Following the inquest, after examining the deaths of environmental consultant Doug Erickson, Teck Cominco employee Bob Newcombe and paramedics Kim Weitzel and Shawn Currier and finding them to be accidental, the five-person jury made six recommendations to the ministry.

Confused response

All four workers succumbed from a lack of oxygen in a water-sampling shed at the Sullivan Mine in Kimberley, which was in the process of being decommissioned at the time of the accident.

The first to enter the shed, on May 15, was Doug Erickson. He was taking weekly samples and breathing the oxygen-depleted air coming from the pipe. He was found two days after his disappearance. While trying to rescue him, Bob Newcombe also collapsed, fell into a cavity and died.

Before attempting to rescue his colleague, he had time to call 911. But the dispatch centre didn't understand the accident had happened in a confined area on a mine site.

When paramedic Kim Weitzel went into the shed, guided by a Teck Cominco contractor, she thought she was responding to a drowning. She wasn't told about the risks of gas and lost consciousness almost immediately. Her co-worker, Shawn Currier, then rushed to help her, and died in the same circumstances.

The rescue effort was delayed by a misunderstanding at the dispatch centre and confusion about the address of the sampling shed.

Most jury findings implemented

On March 13, 2008, following the creation of a code review committee, Victoria announced amendments to the Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in British Columbia. Through a press release, then minister of state for Mining Kevin Krueger announced that all the inquest recommendations aimed at the ministry had been addressed, and that most had been incorporated in the revised Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in British Columbia.

For example, the jury recommended that the ministry "amend the Mines Act regulations to meet or exceed the WCB standards with regards to confined space provisions in the Occupational Health and Safety regulations."

Had the regulation from WCB already been implemented on the mine site, the shed in which Doug Erickson died would have been defined as a confined space and signs would have warned of possible dangers.

The ministry has agreed to this change and the families are pleased. "By adapting the standards for confined spaces for the province to those of WorkSafeBC, they made positive changes here," says George Weitzel.

The ministry's amendments also included the adoption of new reporting requirements for mine managers in the event of an accident or dangerous occurrence.

Rules without teeth?

Despite these changes, Weitzel and the families are still concerned by a key aspect -- regarding penalty provision and annual inspections on mine sites -- that according to them is missing. "They didn't touch on Recommendation 12, and it's still frustrating to us," says Weitzel.

The panel asked the ministry to review the effectiveness of its enforcement strategy. It suggested that the ministry establish a minimum number of site visits per mine per year to make sure the companies implement the regulations, and that the government increases the penalty provisions to "reflect the seriousness of non-compliance."

NDP MLA Norm Macdonald has been moved by the strength of the families in their attempt to make sure an accident like the one that happened between May 15 and 17 of 2006 does not happen again. He asked for a commitment that inspections would be made on a regular basis, but so far to no avail. "Why is it unreasonable to ask that inspections be held at least once a year?" he asks. "When is this coming? When do we see implementation of Recommendation 12?"

"We don't see why they would make changes when they don't have an incentive to do so. The act has to have some teeth," adds Weitzel, and the lack of consequences for breaching the new rules takes away from the effectiveness of the new Mines Act regulations.

According to the ministry, however, penalties are already in place in case mining companies don't comply with the rules. "Shutting a portion or an entire operation down [as written in the code for mining] is a definite financial penalty. Section 37 of the Mines Act also provides penalties of up to one year in jail or a fine of up to $100,000," wrote communication director Graham Currie in an e-mail sent to The Tyee on May 17, 2008. Further details on the adequacy and application of these rules could not, however, be obtained, despite repeated inquiries.

Macdonald associates this lack of commitment to the influence of the mining industry in British Columbia. "The lack of work on Recommendation 12 has been a concern to us since the beginning. It's a test between public interest and a company extremely connected," he adds.

Families want answers

The families are also disappointed in the ministry's efforts to communicate with them. The Sullivan Mine accident coroner's inquest jury specifically recommended that the families be informed of measures taken by the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources following the publication of the recommendations.

Yet according to George Weitzel, only once did the ministry contact him on the question of the recommendations.

On March 13, Weitzel noticed a message on his voicemail from a representative of the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources. "He left his name and his phone number. I called him back and left a message, and I didn't hear a word. No response whatsoever."

The Tyee's calls were also not returned. Over the months of May and June, The Tyee sent several e-mails and made several phone calls to the ministry, with few results. Communication officers at the ministry stated several times that neither the former minister of state for mining, Kevin Krueger, nor the new chief inspector for mining in B.C., Douglas Sweeney, had time for interviews.

Weitzel says he and the other families lost confidence in the capacity of the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources to communicate with them on the evolution of the review process.

Despite the desire of the families to get closure, no one at the ministry has taken the time to answer their concerns directly. And the families say that the attitude of the Ministry of Mines raises a more troubling issue: how should the government handle requests for more information by citizens directly involved in coroner's inquests, and how should it assist in creating closure for them and their relatives?

In George Weitzel's mind, however, one overriding question remains to be answered: will they get the assurance that Recommendation 12 will be implemented fully? "That's the only thing we ask," says Weitzel.

Related Tyee stories

 [Tyee]

15  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • AH HA

    3 years ago

    Due Diligence

    Unfortunately what is now known as WorkSafeBC and the Ministry of mines have had a turf war going on for twenty years or so from what I’ve been told. It usually comes down to the fact that WorkSafeBC does not have enough inspection officers for their own jurisdictional responsibilities let alone mines and quarries. There are a few exceptions however that allow ‘WCB’ to inspect and investigate at mines.

    Confined space rescuers are the most likely to be killed in a confined space incident, the data is well supported and published in this respect. Here is a link to a WorkSafeBC video that illustrates this point:
    http://www2.worksafebc.com/Publications/Multimedia/Videos.asp?reportid=34287

    What is needed is the BC government needs to utilise the C.C.C. provisions to prosecute the “responsible” persons who do not exercise due diligence. The law has been around for a while now, what are they waiting for?

  • SharingIsGood

    3 years ago

    mining like forest sector?

    In the past decade the forest companies of BC have doanted more than 6.5 million dollars to the BC Liberal party. Is it any wonder that laws get rewritten so that forest companies get to ship whole logs from old growth forests, and after logging some of their forests WFP is given permission to change forest land from TFL status to private land for sale and development.

    http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=7046&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

    I guess the mining companies are no different.

    Quote:
    Top Donors Thrive under BC Liberals

    http://thetyee.ca/News/2005/04/14/TopDonorsThrive/

    I think, Due Dilligence, the Liberals are waiting for this story to blow over.

  • Luke Skywalker

    3 years ago

    TFL Removals...

    SIG:

    Quote:
    ...after logging some of their forests WFP is given permission to change forest land from TFL status to private land for sale and development.

    Read the auditor general's report and the criticisms are fair enough.

    But buried within the auditor general's report was the removal of the private forest lands of TimberWest situate on Vancouver Island from TFL 46 & 47.

    More interestingly that removal was undertaken by the then NDP government in December, 1998.

    A whopping 60,000 hectares as opposed to the 27,000 in the WFL case.

    Regarding that 60,000 hectare removal by the NDP government, the auditor general found:

    Future Forest Management: NO

    First Nation Consultation: NO

    Access: NO

    First Nations Access: NO

    Wildlife Habitat: NO

    Old Growth Management: NO

    Community Watersheds: NO

    Research: NO

    Recreation: NO

    So what's the scoop on that TFL removal????

  • SharingIsGood

    3 years ago

    This government is in question

    Luke,

    I belong to no political party. What you say about a party that was in power over seven years ago may well be true. That government was in power almost 3 elections ago.

    Luke, like Lynn, I am concerned with the current government. This Liberal government guaranteed that it would be the most open government ever. This government said it would consult with the public. At a time when beetle-wood should be flogged and West Coast stands of Duglas fir, hemlock, coast spruce and cedar should be conserved, this government removed or alterred nearly every existing law/regulation. This government allowed the forest companies to self-regulate, then it allowed them to sell the land at a huge profit.

    Luke, it isn't time for ancient history lessons. The voters ditched the NDP, seven years ago. This government has had 7 years of record commodity prices and record demand for those commodities. This government has squandered the profits of the public purse. It has been selling off minerals and trees, without holding the corporations who are reaping profits by raping mountains and valleys and not taking care of the workers involved. It is this government. There is hardly an NDP MLA left from seven years ago. You can't blame the opposition for this. And don't forget, the Liberals have cut question period to 1/2 hour and they have refused to answer the bulk of the most important questions when questions are asked.

    You have trouble staying on topic, Luke: you always sidestep, putting up meaningless poll numbers or talking about ancient NDP history when the Campbell party is called into question. Luke, out of respect for the family that has been devastated by the policies and lack of caring by this mean-spirited Liberal government, you could do better by saying nothing.

  • Luke Skywalker

    3 years ago

    I Don't Get It...

    Ya bring up the WFL TFL removal... bad, bad Liberals???

    And I respond to same...

    But the TW TFL removal... good, good NDP???

    Just the same... It's obvious that once in government both parties seem to act alike!

    Which reminds me... Corky Evans, NDP MLA for Nelson Creston, recently announced his retirement from politics.

    And his daughter recently posted this letter to the Vancouver Sun:

    Quote:
    Vancouver Sun, Saturday, June 07, 2008

    Re: "Folksy Evans set to quit provincial politics, June 4

    In light of the announcement by my father, MLA Corky Evans (NDP--Nelson-Creston), I find myself free to comment on things political.

    I am relieved that in 2009 I will no longer have to associate my father with what has been the worst-led Opposition in recent memory.

    With incredulity, I have watched Carole James essentially cede the NDP's platform, through miscalculation and a complete absence of political sophistication, to the provincial Liberal and Green parties.

    Somehow, she has made 30 seats less effectual than the previous unrecognized opposition of two.

    I find myself wishing my father would do upon leaving what he did when he ran for leader -- motivate his party to take a rigorous look at the road it is travelling and reassess its leadership.

    Sandi Swanigan

    Richmond

    So your answer is that an NDP government in 2009 will be a solution???

    Most BC'ers don't think so. It would be akin to jumping from the frying pan into the fire.

    PS. I'm sorry to hear that your family is under duress. Really.

  • SharingIsGood

    3 years ago

    EVERYBODIE'S FAMILIES

    Two things Luke who says:

    Quote:
    PS. I'm sorry to hear that your family is under duress. Really.

    1. I was speaking about Kim Wietzel's family(s) - the people that this article is about. If they'd let me, I'd be honoured for them to consider me as part of their extended family. I happily lend support if asked.

    2. Lack of empathy for these people seems be standard Gord and his gang politics. (No crocodile tears after the fact please.)

    Post scripts for Luke:

    There you go again, talking about the NDP when, for 7 years, they've barely been given a chance to be heard (neither by the mainstream media nor by Gord's gang).

    The election is not yet upon us, we don't really know who is going to be running for the NDP. But you see, it doesn't matter to me, Luke, because I will still pray, "Please, let us have ANYONE BUT CAMPBELL."

  • Luke Skywalker

    3 years ago

    SIG...

    Sorry, I apparently misinterpreted you last statement.

    Quote:
    There you go again, talking about the NDP when, for 7 years, they've barely been given a chance to be heard (neither by the mainstream media nor by Gord's gang).

    Oh come on. I read five papers daily and watch Global BCTV... the news junkie that I am... and certainly disagree with your assessment.

    Since you are so aware of NDP policies, please tell me:

    1. What is the NDP position on the twinning of the Port Mann Bridge/ Hwy 1 expansion?

    2. What is the NDP position on the expansion of the natural gas industry in northeast BC?

    3. What is the NDP position on the future removal of ALR lands in a First Nations Treaty?

    4. With regards to the NDP Climate Action Framework, what is the actual Cost To Consumers as stated therein of all of the policies described therein?

    Those are just top-of-the-head queries, but I look forward to your responses to same.

    Quote:
    The election is not yet upon us, we don't really know who is going to be running for the NDP.

    But you see, it doesn't matter to me, Luke, because I will still pray, "Please, let us have ANYONE BUT CAMPBELL."

    In that vein, you just might be surprised at the Greens performance come May, 2009.

    I've seen Green party leader Jane Sterk on Voice of BC and was actually impressed with her down-to-earth nature, intelligence and sensible statements.

    No wonder she topped the polls as councillor in Esquimalt in 2005.

    I'd certainly wager that she will come out on top at the 2009 leaders debate above her rivals.

    She likely won't be able to pull off a Gordon Wilson a la 1991... but still...

  • SharingIsGood

    3 years ago

    [EDITED. -MODERATOR.]

    Luke says:

    Quote:
    I read five papers daily and watch Global BCTV...

    [MODERATOR NOTE: PLEASE FOCUS ON A PERSON'S ARGUMENT RATHER THAN MAKING ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT HIS/HER IDENTITY]

  • SharingIsGood

    3 years ago

    In terms of awareness

    of the NDP position, it doesn't really matter. Gord and his gang often say/pretend to have a platform then they do whatever the hell Gord and his big business cronies want after the election. He damn near lost the last election. It was almost a perfect storm for him. Gord doesn't care about the people of this province, he doesn't care about the province, period. Get it through your head, Luke, your hero is a menace to society!

  • Luke Skywalker

    3 years ago

    SIG...

    How did ya guess????

    1. Province - great sports section;

    2. Sun - relatively good provincial and local news;

    3. Globe - in-depth national and international coverage;

    4. Post - in-depth national and international covergae;

    5. Financial Post - in-depth financial coverage;

    6. Global BCTV - best of the lot;

    Yep, I've been a media monitor since Grade 5.

    In other words, ya can't answer my previous queries. Go figure.

  • Luke Skywalker

    3 years ago

    SIG...

    Quote:
    Get it through your head, Luke, your hero is a menace to society!

    Oh brother. :)

  • SharingIsGood

    3 years ago

    Luke admits

    Quote:
    Yep, I've been a media monitor since Grade 5.

    Your assessment of those newpapers and Global & BCTV is scary to me, Luke. The Globe and Mail is somewhat unbiased compared to the others, but you don't really think you are getting balanced news when you read and watch your news sources??? Maybe that's it, if you've been a media monitor since Grade 5, and those are your sources, I fear you've been brainwashed.

    It seems that with the hundreds of people Campbell has hired (with our tax dollars) for media monitoring-type activities you can be paid for what you have been doing for years.

  • Frank

    3 years ago

    BC Libs : A thousand ways to waste tax money

    Quote:
    Communication officers at the ministry stated several times that neither the former minister of state for mining, Kevin Krueger, nor the new chief inspector for mining in B.C., Douglas Sweeney, had time for interviews.

    Why do we need to pay to have "communications officers" whose only communication is to tell us they don't have time to do the interviews their bosses are too busy to do?

    Why else would you hire a "communications officer"? To set up your iPod?

    I'd like to know what communications people do have time for since its clearly not communicating.

  • G West

    3 years ago

    Global/BCTV - best of the lot

    Now that's a scary concept!

  • SharingIsGood

    3 years ago

    split the left

    Quote:
    I've seen Green party leader Jane Sterk on Voice of BC and was actually impressed with her down-to-earth nature, intelligence and sensible statements.

    From Luke's words above, it sounds to me like he may be hoping people will vote Green when they mark their ballot against Campbell. If the Greens can garner the anti-Campbell votes, then the true right-wingers might carry enough seats to defeat the NDP. I think that the combined seats of the Greens and the NDP would be more than enough to defeat Campbell.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.