News

Too Many Sea Otters?

Some want to be able to kill them again off BC's coast. Part one of a Tyee special report.

By Lana Okerlund, 4 Oct 2007, TheTyee.ca

Sea Otter

A troublesome taste for shellfish.

It was unusual to see a live sea otter off the coast of Tofino, much less a dead one. As my friend Pippa kept watch over the carcass we had found lying at the water's edge, I trudged across the beach to fetch my cell phone from my little coupe -- and gauge the capacity of its trunk. Pippa also happened to be Dr. Pippa Shepherd, species-at-risk coordinator for Parks Canada, and she was determined to find a way to get the dead animal to a lab. It's definitely not going to fit in my car, I thought with relief as I walked back toward her with the phone.

It was the 2004 Labour Day long weekend, and we were at Chesterman Beach on Vancouver Island's west coast. We'd planned to cap our girls' getaway weekend with a fancy dinner in Tofino in a few hours. The discovery of a dead otter was an abrupt interruption.

The mammal's dark wet fur glistened in the late-afternoon sun. "It looks very fresh," Shepherd was saying into the cell phone, leaving urgent voice mails for her colleagues at Parks Canada and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. "Call me back as soon as you can."

As she hung up the phone and gazed at the creature on the sand, my friend's face flashed a mixture of anger, excitement, and resolve. Part of her job was to serve on the recovery team for sea otters, then listed as a threatened species by both the federal and B.C. provincial governments. With much to learn about causes of otter mortality, Shepherd knew she had to get this one into a fridge, fast.

Decimation

Hundreds of years ago, sea otters were regular sights off the coast of B.C., part of an estimated population of 150,000 to 300,000 that inhabited the northern Pacific coastline arcing up from Hokkaido, Japan, to the Kuril Islands and Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula, across the Bering Sea to Alaska, and down the North American west coast all the way to Baja, Mexico. Coastal Aboriginal tribes -- like the Nuu-chah-nulth and Haida in B.C. -- prized the animals' pelts for their warmth and the prestige they bestowed on their wearers. Luxuriantly dense and soft, otter fur was worn as chiefs' regalia and was given in potlatches to mark coming-of-age ceremonies, weddings, and funerals. Aboriginal songs, stories, dances, and art celebrated the sea otter's gifts.

The mid-18th century marked the tipping point in the delicate ecological balance between people, sea otters, and the sea urchins, abalone, clams, crabs, and other shellfish they both fed on. Russian commander Vitus Bering, Spanish explorer Juan Perez, and British Captain James Cook all discovered the riches that could be had from obtaining sea otter pelts from Aboriginal hunters in exchange for iron, cloth, and beads, and then trading the pelts with Chinese mandarins on their return voyages.

By the 1770s, Nootka Sound on the west coast of what is now known as Vancouver Island was a major hub in the lucrative trade. Farther south, Spaniards and Americans were on their own quests for what had become the most valuable fur in the world.

The frenzied demand soon decimated the sea otter population. By the mid-1800s the commercial enterprise was largely over. In 1911, when the International Fur Seal Treaty banning the hunt was signed between Japan, Russia, the U.S., and Britain (representing Canada), fewer than 2,000 sea otters remained in the world, mostly in hard-to-reach waters off Russia, Alaska, and California. In 1929, the mammals were extirpated in B.C. when the last known sea otter was found dead in Kyuquot Sound, about three-quarters up the west side of Vancouver Island. It had been shot.

Rebound

Thanks to the 1911 treaty and more recent endangered species legislation in the U.S. and Canada, sea otters were on a worldwide rebound by the time Shepherd and I came across ours in 2004. In fact, close to 3,200 of the mammals were once again living in B.C. waters, and over 100,000 worldwide. Though the population had not yet expanded to its full historic range -- hence, the rarity of our find in Tofino -- and was still vulnerable to a single catastrophic event -- say, an oil spill -- sea otter recovery was cautiously regarded as a success in Canada's species-at-risk community.

As the afternoon ticked by and the tide started to come in on Chesterman Beach, Shepherd finally managed to reach a colleague at DFO. Assured that help was now on the way, she insisted that I and another friend keep our dinner reservation while she kept watch on the beach.

On her own and concerned about the rising tide, Shepherd grasped a hind flipper and pulled the waterlogged animal -- "it must have weighed eighty to a hundred pounds," she recalls -- to higher ground. She waved off curious dogs with a stick. "As I watched over the otter, I tried to get a handle on what might have killed it, but there were no clues."

About an hour later, a colleague showed up with a truck and a tarp, and the two women hauled the animal to a Parks Canada storage freezer near Tofino's airport. By the time Shepherd returned to our campsite, plans were in place for the otter's transfer to the mainland for a necropsy.

I had nearly forgotten about our little adventure when Shepherd phoned me a few weeks later with some surprising news. The necropsy had confirmed what had killed our sea otter. A gun.

Why would someone shoot an endangered animal? This question gnawed at me for over two years until eventually I decided to find out. Turns out that what I thought was a black and white issue is actually a complicated shade of grey.

Keystone species

Edward O. Wilson -- the so-called father of modern biodiversity study -- says that the sea otter may be the most potent keystone species on the planet. Once such a species is removed from an ecosystem, drastic change occurs. The dramatic decline of sea otters in the 18th and 19th centuries triggered massive increases in the populations of their prey -- sea urchins, sea cucumbers, northern abalone, clams, geoducks, and Dungeness crabs. In turn, the new abundance of urchins devastated the kelp forests they fed on, producing desert-like barrens. Loss of kelp increased coastal erosion and meant no watery homes for nursery fish.

Given the benefits of having sea otters around, Canadian biologists jumped at the chance to reintroduce them to B.C. in 1969. The U.S. Atomic Energy Agency planned to conduct an underground nuclear test in the Bering Sea near southwest Alaska, and the Canadians received permission to remove some of the sea otters still inhabiting the area and transplant them off the west coast of Vancouver Island.

They chose the shallow waters around the Bunsby Islands in Checleset Bay, just north of Kyuquot Sound. On July 31, 1969, 29 otters were captured and flown in close and noisy confinement to the release site. Not surprisingly, few survived the relocation.

A second attempt was made by boat in July 1970. U.S. fish and wildlife officers captured 45 sea otters in nets and placed them in holding tanks on board the U.S. research boat, the G.B. Reed. Only 19 animals survived to be released in the Bunsbys. Still, an increase in sea otter sightings over the next two years provided some assurance that this transplant had been more successful.

The final effort was made in July 1972. This time, 46 sea otters were removed from the ocean using salmon gill nets, and then injected with an anti-stress hormone. After being transferred by aircraft and then by ship to Vancouver Island, the otters were placed in temporary floating pens within the warm waters of Checleset Bay, where they could clean their fur and recuperate from the journey before their final release. Ian MacAskie, long-time marine researcher in the eastern Pacific, wrote about the experience in an article for The Beaver in 1975. "The transplant was a thorough success," he enthused.

Except for one thing. The people who had lived on the shores of the bay for 5,000 years -- the Kyuquot/Checleset, one of the Nuu-chah-nulth's 14 chiefly families -- had not been consulted nor even informed about the otters' return.

Leo Jack is a Nuu-chah-nulth who was born in Kyuquot in 1963 and has lived in this community ever since. "If they'd told us what otters would do to our seafood, we would have fought them," he says. "We would have said no."

'A love reaction'

"Most people's reaction to a sea otter is a love reaction," says Shepherd as we visit the Vancouver Aquarium. With their pert button noses and long fringes of whiskers, curious expressions and alert black eyes, sea otters are extremely charismatic. Children around us clap their hands and shriek with glee as the Aquarium's four sea otters twist and twirl and play-wrestle with abandon.

While many scientists object to the anthropomorphizing of animals, it is easy to do with sea otters. As males explore and extend the species' range, females and pups live together in intimate communities. When they sleep, they link paws so they don't drift away from each other. When they catch their food they break the shells on their chests using rocks or other hard objects. They're one of the few animals known to use tools like this. Even Shepherd gets sheepishly affected by them. "They're such goofy, busy, cute, fuzzy things," she says.

Cute they may be, but they are also voracious eaters, consuming a quarter to a third of their body weight every single day. With an average male weighing 100 pounds, that's a lot of grub.

After being released in Checleset Bay, sea otters flourished on the abundant supply of shellfish that had sprung up in their absence -- the same creatures that their Aboriginal neighbours relied on for food and medicinal purposes.

"Sea otters have changed things quite a bit around here," says Jack. "They eat everything that we used to eat." A stocky, friendly man who makes his living transporting kayakers around Kyuquot Sound, Jack gets a bit tense when talking about sea otters. He reminisces about collecting abalone and sea urchins for communal feasts. "The whole tribe would come together to eat them. Elders would go nuts over that stuff. Now they're all gone. My mom would take me out on the rocks in the summer, early in the morning when the tide was out. We'd walk along the rocks and get a bucket of abalone. We'd eat them raw or fry them up with butter. Now my kids don't know what they even taste like."

What Jack doesn't say is that abalone were over-fished by commercial harvesters well before sea otters had a chance to have an impact, but his claims about sea urchins are backed by scientists and observers on all sides of the issue.

'How we made a living'

Although he misses the taste of abalone and urchins -- soft, milky, kind of sweet -- Jack is particularly rankled by the otters' more recent attack on intertidal clams -- the Kyuquot's only substantive commercial fishery.

"There used to be manila clams on every beach on the coast," he says. "That's how we made our living in the winter besides logging." Since the otters' reappearance, Jack says there have been few wild clam openings. Even then, digging has been restricted to a single beach. "I'd trade otters in for the seafood any day."

Roger Dunlop, a scientist from Calgary who is now employed by the Nuu-chah-nulth Tribal Council, supports Jack's claims. As the tribe's northern region biologist, Dunlop spends a lot of his time studying the coastal ecosystem. "The intertidal clam fishery was one of the last remaining artisanal fisheries that required no investment other than a small speed boat, gum boots, a raincoat, and a rake," he says. "Once the otters cleaned out the urchins and other shellfish in Kyuquot, they started eating clams, so now there's even more competition between people and otters. A lot of people in Kyuquot feel that their rights are secondary to these animals."

Tomorrow, the second of two parts: From endangered species to resented predator. The legal challenge to protecting otters off B.C.'s coast.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

24  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • c otter

    5 years ago

    Good story

    Thanks for an informative and well researched article.

  • Frank

    5 years ago

    Thanks

    Very well written.

  • snert

    5 years ago

    Aw shucks - pun intended.

    Quote:
    Although he misses the taste of abalone and urchins -- soft, milky, kind of sweet -- Jack is particularly rankled by the otters' more recent attack on intertidal clams -- the Kyuquot's only substantive commercial fishery.

    You can't win.

  • ME2

    5 years ago

    Tricky subject

    So far she's been very careful, no mention of Abalone as a "traditional staple", and just a passing reference to Kelp.

  • RickW

    5 years ago

    Suck It Up, Fellas!

    So the otters come back and someone's business takes a dive - a business that wouldn't have existed had the otter continued on, instead of being "extirpated".

    And listen to the moaning going on because the Canuck dollar is (once again) a dollar!GASP!

    What is it with the "free enterprise" types, that they can't adjust to the changing marketplace, and would rather see species exterminated (and just about anything or anyone else destroyed)just so they can keep their comfortable niche?

    Suck it up, fellas! Live what you preach! Adapt to the changing marketplace - just like you keep preaching at the "lefties" and "union types" to do............

  • Angler

    5 years ago

    Here We Go Again

    A sad, but all-too-familiar story. First, "we" screw it up. Then "we" try to fix it. Then something goes wrong with the fix. Then "we" try to fix that. And around and around we go.

    At some point, during every such cycle, some group will claim that there are "too many (insert species here)". Current examples include sport and commercial salmon fishermen (too many seals) and homeowners on the outskirts of the city (too many backyard bears). And now we have the Nuu-chah-nulth (too many sea otters).

    Traditional "fixes": (a) Cull the offending populations, or; (b) Introduce a "natural" predator. Unfortunately, both of these solutions represent another shot in the dark ... because we don't know how to manage ecosystems or wildlife populations (notwithstanding the assurances to the contrary that we routinely hear and read from earnest biologists and well-meaning wildlife managers).

    Sometimes, doing nothing is a whole lot better than doing the wrong thing. So let's leave the sea otters, the seals and the bears alone for a century or two, and see what happens.

    Apologies for the rant.

  • BC Mary

    5 years ago

    Otter invasion

    Anybody ever had an otter invasion?

    Well, I have. These were identified as River Otters and so help me, I welcomed them when they tore a hole into the crawl space of my house on Pender Island. "Just block off that small area where they've come in, and let them stay," I told the handyman.

    I thought this would be heavenly, living at peace with one of Nature's perfect creatures.

    About a year went by, no problems at all. Then one night about 3:00 AM I was awakened by the most godawful stench filling the entire household. I went downstairs and opened all the doors to let the sea-breezes howl through. I was certain that something had died and was decomposing under my house, it was that bad.

    Shortened story: who knew that animals shat in their own nests? My handyman promptly quit. Luckily for me, an old friend volunteered because somewhere along his life's path, he had lost all sense of smell.

    He, bless him forever, took 13 big black pastic bags of otter-poop away, applied mortar cement to wherever they had "been", and totally sealed off the crawl-space forever. The fat little ingrates had even pulled down the pink fibreglass insulation to make themselves beds (and bathrooms).

    They eat 1/3 their body weight of shellfish each day? I believe it.

    Like Jack at Kyuquot Sound, I get a little tense too, when I remember trying to live in harmony with Otters.

  • BC Mary

    5 years ago

    Correct: let them be.

    Angler:

    Let me add here, what I meant to add onto my anecdote.

    As a result of my experiment, I concluded that living with River Otters -- or any other wild creature -- really means letting them be. I totally agree with you on that point.

    My error was in thinking I could shelter them in a non-interfering sort of way. That didn't work either.

    I tried, one other time, buying 50-lb sacks of carrots for the deer. Another dumb idea.

    Respectful non-interference is the only way. Heck, it's what I ask for myself.

  • Canis Latrans

    5 years ago

    Again, the main problem is...

    Actually, in principle, I am not against human hunting, fishing and gathering. But let's face it, it is not so much the otters and seals that are over populating the oceans as it is people over-population nearly everywhere, and making too great a demand themselves on nature's wildlife and other resources. It is we and our out of control appetites that are polluting the oceans (sea lice etc) , destroying spawning beds and streams with our over-development, and consuming our way to decimation of the entire planet.

    Our incessant whining about seals and sea otter are but our own particular kind of scapegoating, to detract from our own need to seriously reduce our population levels, and our over-consumption of nature in just about every given form. ( A cull of humans! A rather different concept, eh?)

    I understand the Native need for an economy, and concede that their numbers and consumption levels are not the main problem here-, in isolation. We need to look closer to immigrant society, especially on this continent, to discover the real consumption gluttons-, the rip, rape and run economic steamroller.

    As I said, I am, especially, not opposed to a native themselves controlled "harvesting" of any unthreatened wildlife or other resources. It is we, after all, who are the interlopers here with the out of control "immigrant" population explosion, driven by out of control capitalist expansion and cheap labour/market growth demands.

    (Hell, the historically evolved immigrant society on this continent, from which I myself sprang, is currently so busy friggin' working and consuming, focused on "the corporatist profit prize" for ourselves, we can't even make enough babies to replace ourselves anymore. We are the out of place, artificial entity excessively leeching upon nature here, more than any lowly otters, for sure.

    continued next post...

  • Canis Latrans

    5 years ago

    Main problem again...

    From previous post.

    Time to 'fess up, face the facts, and take action where we are involved ourselves, before we get the right to sermonize about either Natives or otter. (And that ain't to say that Natives are complete innocents here, not at all. Just that there's big fish and little fish in this blame game sea, and here it is ourselves that are the blimpos of greatest jeopardy to all the life spheres on the planet.)

    And frig' the scientists here too. They, by and large, but come out of and reflect the corporatist institutional ethos that colours their so-called science very often anyway.

    Otters to blame for the destruction of shellfish!!!!! Not anymore than they are to blame for seal lice or the collapse of the wild salmon or cod fishery, or global warming.

    I remember the shores of Parksville and Comox, on Vancouver Island, when one had to but walk out on any one of their beaches and close in harvest just about any kind of shellfish you could name. That is, until capitalist over-development and the Immigrant Society's population explosion caught up with them. Scarcely ever saw a sea otter during that time. It was long after the shellfish were already gone that they tried to recover the decimated otter.

    The finger is pointed in the wrong direction here, unless we're prepared to stand in front of a mirror and do it.

  • doggone

    5 years ago

    Balanced article and good comments

    I want to second "Canis Latrans" comment (no, we are not the same person I flunked Latin) and sympathize with BCMary - I have loaded my share of Otter poop mixed with pink insulation from crawlspaces.

    It is also refreshing to find an artical which concerns itself with a topic outside the (admit it!) naval gazing, GVRD centric/B.C. Politcs centric stance of most writing on TheTyee. I spent more time than I would have wished this summer in the fair city and as far as I could see things are "just fine" there: good bus systems (Compared to Vancouver Island) and happy busy people. I happened to notice some "down and outers" - possibly because I identify more with them than the "happy busy".

    Asked a known researcher on the Orca Whale populations here for his take on the future in two words. He said "We're ******"
    He went on though: "If I could use three words they would be: Too many people!

    Since first swimming in the Georgia Strait in 1963 I have observed this coast in parts from Masset to Puget Sound by boat and walking on shore.
    She is suffering
    Ken

  • ME2

    5 years ago

    Interesting, the usual

    Interesting, the usual notice for the second part of this story appeared this afternoon, but when I clicked on it, the response was "Page not Found"

    One half-hour later, the notice itself disappeared and remains so.

    This suggests to me that perhaps the article was recalled for a rewrite.

    Since it is impossible to write a credible and honest story regarding past and present interactions between FNs and Sea otter without enraging FNs and people like GWest, I suspect pressure is being applied to writer Lana Oberlund to render her account in a more politically correct manner.

    I hope she resists.

  • G West

    5 years ago

    ME2

    You really must be smoking something if you think I have any influence on the people who edit and write here at Tyee.

    I don't. Never have – wouldn’t be interested.

    I speak just for myself and only myself - as always - and I'm not the in the slightest interested in ganging up on anyone, least of all Lana Okerland.

    As for the 'page not found' screen - it happens occasionally with this software - again, nothing to do with me. When new stories are added and others moved around in the queue there are times when some stories just aren't available for a time - welcome to the internet.

  • ME2

    5 years ago

    GWest

    Since the glitch disappeared shortly after my post, your explanation makes sense.

    And since you're claiming you speak only for yourself; are you saying you're REALLY not all those other people the others say you are? :-)

  • G West

    5 years ago

    Absolutely

    Like a whole of the things Truman writes about, that stuff is all nonsense, I'm no one but me.

  • G West

    5 years ago

    errata

    should be:
    Like a lot of the things Truman writes about, that stuff is all nonsense, I'm no one but me.

    I certainly don't mean to imply everything Truman writes here (or anywhere else for that matter) is nonsense.

  • RickW

    5 years ago

    Solution:

    Just make the commercial use of ANY "natural resource" a crime in and of itself......

    ....which means only tertiary applications of same can be bought and sold.

    Radical, huh?

  • Fogotwillingate

    5 years ago

    Population Control

    I don't oppose culling any creature whose numbers have reached an unnatural level, because of lack of predators. However, care must be taken to ensure that the species will not be put at general risk.

    Once in a while you can see fresh water Otters at the small landing beside the new housing development south of Citadel Hill (Port Coquitlam). I once counted 30 drifting down river, at one time.

  • Canis Latrans

    5 years ago

    Quote:I don't oppose culling

    Quote:
    I don't oppose culling any creature whose numbers have reached an unnatural level, because of lack of predators. However, care must be taken to ensure that the species will not be put at general risk. Wrote Forgot...

    Hmmm. Which would be a really interesting concept if it is to be equally applied by the rest of the animal kingdom-, upon humans. Who have too few to zero predators that feed upon them, save their own. Which draws us closer to the heart of the matter, for sure.

  • Fogotwillingate

    5 years ago

    Human Supremacy

    Canis Latrans;

    Yep, we humans are supremacists, natural born.

  • ME2

    5 years ago

    What trumps what??

    The main point here, Forgot, is not that the SO is at risk, rather it is that that previous inshore bounty occurred simply because "culling" for short-term objectives was not a "management" option.

    A somewhat similar situation arose when the harvesting of Gray whales, again for highly questionable "cultural" reasons, was disallowed.

    And so the other salient point - which is still unpopular to address today - is that preserving what today is an anti-environmental and unsustainable option, purely for "cultural" reasons, is morally unsound. Doing so merely lends validation to the "cultural" reasoning people like Campbell use for such things as run-of-the-river hydro.

    And so, as the neocons are fond of reminding us, our needs trump those of the environment, right ???

  • seaseal

    5 years ago

    Otters in Larger Numbers --Keystone

    As someone who works around the otters on Monterey Bay, I'd like to add some fuel to this discussion. Otters in greater numbers never did in the urchins (they only eat one of two kinds of urchins), never dropped the numbers of clams, never destroyed the abalones.

    Only one animal has done all those things: man. As ususal, though, it's more comforting to blame someone (something) else.

    As a keystone species, otters are an indicator that things are going well in their ecosystem, which includes all those things: clams, fish, kelp, urchins, abalone. If you give it a bit of time, you'll see the emergence of everything, in balance.

    An otter does eat 25% to 33% of its weight a day (take the number of pounds you weigh and turn that into Quarter Pounders, and that's how many you'd have to eat to keep up), but it eats up to thirty different types of things, and has strategies so it "overfishes" an area.

    Otter mothers teach their pups to eat this diversity so they can maintain their ecosystem. Otters will specialize in a smaller number of food types, but they will also move in a wider range to even things out.

    I know how easy it is to choose a target to blame that can't talk back; I also know how much in denial we humans are about our population's contributions to maritime death: sewage, pesticides, petro-toxins, acid rain, and fishing and hunting all systematically reduce sea life.

    Our otter population is declining. One main problem in the Monterey Bay stems from people flushing cat litter down the toilet. Water treatment facilities can't handle parasites called Toxoplasma gondii that get into the clams and then into the otters.

    Please read more about otters and their important position in their ecosystem before you take off protections. Also I encourage people to contact The Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute and the Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, which both have ongoing otter research.

  • seaseal

    5 years ago

    Errata on overfishes

    Sorry--I fixed it twice (one time too many) and so

    >but it eats up to thirty different types of things, and
    >has strategies so it "overfishes" an area.

    should read

    but it eats up to thirty different types of things, and has strategies so it never "overfishes" an area.

    I too trod the shores of Vancouver Island, the mainland, and Puget Sound as a child. I remember the thousands of squirts, before cars raced on the sand, before houses were built on the cliffs, before we invaded so heavily.

    Education can change the impact of "immigrants" if we choose to go that route.

  • ME2

    5 years ago

    Kelp

    Seseal, for a while I was following the efforts of conservation groups in California who were trying to get kelp forests re-established.

    Have any of these efforts become self-sustaining? Since concern about the Kelp is virtually non-existent in BC, it might be of interest to us to see that others elsewhere recognise a problem and are trying to do something about it.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.