Quest for Super Painkiller that Won't Addict
Snail venom may key a breakthrough.
High risk: narcotics addicts with chronic pain.
In the coastal waters of the South Pacific lives a deadly snail. Its harpoon-like tooth, when sunk into a fish, delivers venom that shuts down nerves, paralyzes muscles, and kills. The venom, which contains chemicals 10 times more powerful than morphine, is leading scientists to develop a new category of painkillers that won't hook patients on their prescriptions.
One of the most promising drugs in the new pain game, NMED-160, was developed at a bio-tech company in Vancouver that recently made a multi-million dollar deal with Merck for the further development of the drug. Although NMED-160 has not yet made it through all the required testing, the prognosis so far looks good. In fact, the arrival of drugs like NMED-160 would profoundly improve the treatment of chronic pain since there would be no addiction risk.
Right now, the best way to deal with pain is with narcotics. Narcotics are drugs derived from the opium poppy and are referred to in scientific circles as opioids. Morphine, codeine, heroin, methadone and oxycotin are all narcotics and they are all very good at blocking pain -- far better, for example, than anti-inflammatories like Aspirin and Tylenol. But all narcotics are also addictive.
Which caused scientists to take a very close look at certain species of predatory marine snails within the genus Conus. The venom of these snails contains chemicals that block cellular communication in the body. The venom not only does a very effective job of killing fish, it has been known to inflict death on humans, as well. The lungs shut down and people die of asphyxiation within hours.
But they do so painlessly, scientists noted, which prompted a search for the painkilling component of the snail toxin.
From three different species of snail, chemicals were isolated that blocked the flow of calcium. That bodes well for alleviation of suffering, because calcium does more than just make strong bones; it is also plays a major role in telling the brain to feel pain.
Blocking channels
Chronic pain (as opposed to the sharp shock of immediate, acute pain) is communicated through specific sensory neurons and in order for those neurons to send a signal they need calcium. By allowing a rapid flow of calcium into the cell, the electrical charge of the neuron changes and neurotransmitters are released which signal the next neuron in the signalling chain to fire. The calcium channels in these sensory neurons that communicate chronic pain are called N-type calcium channels. If you can block those channels, you can prevent pain signals from reaching the brain.
That's what narcotics do, indirectly shutting down N-type calcium channels. But they also increase pleasure chemicals in the brain like dopamine and serotonin in addition to painkilling effects.
The more narcotics a person takes, the more the body becomes physically dependent upon and tolerant of their effects. That process, plus the painkilling pleasure of narcotics, can lead to addiction getting hardwired into the brain.
What makes scientists excited about the potential of the N-type channel blocker from the snail is that it shuts down pain neurons without creating pleasure or other triggers for addiction common to narcotics.
'All systems go'
When the painkilling effects of the snail toxin were unravelled, labs and drug companies around the world raced to make a drug. Initial efforts resulted in Prialt, which was modelled off the snail chemical. But the drug only works when injected into the spinal chord, which is not a very easy thing to do, especially in the treatment of chronic pain when frequent doses are often needed.
So Dr. Terry Snutch took a different approach and started from scratch. Through Neuromed, the bio-tech company he co-founded in 1998, he designed molecules to block the N-type calcium channel. "[I] synthesized several hundreds of derivatives, and then tested each derivative one by one against whether or not they would block the N-type calcium channel that I had cloned, and NMED-160 came out of that screening program,"
NMED-160 is a small molecule that specifically targets N-type calcium channels and can be taken orally. It is also big news in the pharmaceutical industry, which has been having a hard time finding new drugs to develop and market. A partnership with Merck allows Neuromed to expand its research program. The deal grants $25 million and $202 million more when FDA approval is given and NMED-160 goes to market, but that is still another seven years down the road; NMED-160 still has a lot of testing to go through.
Right now the drug is in clinical trials and not much information is available about its performance. But the primary research shows that NMED-160 "works as well as morphine in animals for chronic neuropathic pain," says Snutch. Whether that effectiveness will carry over when the drug is tested in humans remains to be seen. NMED-160 is two years into a process that takes up to seven years and so far there are "no indications that it's not going to work, so it's all systems go," says Snutch.
New era for pain management?
Researchers investigating the possible use of N-type calcium blockers are pointing to some mouse research to stress the feasibility and safety of using the calcium blocker strategy in treating chronic pain. Mice that were genetically altered to not have N-type calcium channels anywhere showed no serious side effects. The development and lifespan of these mice were normal, and no physical or behavioural abnormalities were found apart from increased pain resistance and decreased anxiety.
Prialt, the first generation of N-type calcium blockers, did affect some calcium channels in neurons that regulated blood pressure, which resulted in low blood pressure in some patients. But that was the only notable side effect of that drug, and thus far NMED-160 has not caused the same problem. So the future looks good for drugs like NMED-160, but the final verdict won't be out until all the tests are done and the data is analyzed.
By targeting chronic pain without addiction, painkillers like NMED-160 used as a substitute for morphine and other narcotics would radically change how chronic pain is treated. Researchers also expect this potential new class of painkillers would avoid other complications associated with narcotics, in including respiratory depression and the need to administer more and more of the drug to create the same effect.
Even if such drugs pass clinical trials, however, a lot will depend on how affordable the drugs are, and how much access family doctors will have to them.
Addicts in pain
Dr. Paul Farnan is a specialist in addiction medicine who will speak at an upcoming Vancouver conference on workplace health. He says that the people on the front lines battling chronic pain and addiction are family doctors. In an interview with The Tyee, he stressed that medical narcotics are very useful in the treatment of chronic pain if prescribed properly.
"The risk of somebody without any pre-existing risk factors becoming addicted to opiates in the true sense of addiction is minimal," says Farnan. As a result, new drugs might not be necessary for everyone with chronic pain because medical narcotics have been well studied and their limits and potential are known.
Farnan thinks that if a drug like NMED-160 works like it's suppose to, it could be an import new treatment option that would "particularly be suitable for people who had a previous history of confirmed addiction that they had treated in the past."
For many people living with chronic pain, medical narcotics are the only things strong enough to allow them to carry on. When that person is also addicted to narcotics or has a previous history of addiction, medical narcotic treatment of their pain can cause a relapse into addictive behaviour.
Farnan believes it is still possible to use medical narcotics to successfully treat people with chronic pain who struggle with addiction. "It involves good history-taking, good discussion with the patient of the pros and cons, good follow-up and after-care."
The level of attention and care that is needed for proper treatment of people with chronic pain and addiction is very high, and our health system is not providing the level of care that is needed, Farnan says. "People with the disease of addiction do not get enough care and enough money injected into the system for proper treatment."
The development of N-type calcium channel blockers, if made affordable, could help meet the challenges of treating people with addiction and chronic pain. And researchers, who got started down this path thanks to a venomous shelled denizen of the South Pacific, are hoping their progress towards that day continues much faster than a snail's pace.
Jeffrey Helm, a former neuroscientist, is writing about science and addiction issues for The Tyee this summer.
Related Tyee stories: Jessica Werb wrote about addiction to the prescribed drug Paxil; Mexican Pavel Gonzalez explained why foreigners find B.C. a perfect place to kick smoking; and public opinion expert Angus Reid surveyed views on drugs and the law in North, Central and South America. ![]()




11
Login or register to post comments
Truman Green
5 years ago
Comments on "Quest for Super Painkiller that Won't Addict&q
Very intersting. The writer comes very close to admitting that heroin is not particularly addictive if administered properly to non-addicted sufferers of pain. Now that sounds like a tautology, I know, but what I mean is that for some strange reason the brain acts in synergy with the pain-diminishing effects of this fantastic analgesic, and with a kind of teeter-totter effect prevents addiction as long as the drug is not overdone, or, for that matter, underdone. That being said, I've only skimmed the hypothetical surface, because actually, heroin is not addictive at all. Okay before you start laughing go read "The Myth of Drug-Induced Addiction by Bruce K. Alexander, Dept. of Psychology, SFU, then come on back here and talk.
The efficacy of heroin as an analgesic provides the addiction, but only in people with chronic pain, either psychological or physical. Acute-temporary pain sufferers never become addicted to heroin as long as their usage is in direct relationship to the duration and intensity of pain. In otherwords, addicts become addicted to being without pain. Can you blame them?
When you're reading the Alexander article pay close attention to all those British medical students who took heroin in a clinical study. Not one of them became addicted!
We've already got the world's best analgesic-heroin, but it's not legal as an analgesic because there's far more money in it as a criminal drug.
And we don't really need snail venum, but the Pharmas do to make more billions in unearned profits.
And not to prescribe heroin for terminally ill sufferers is, of course, a crime in itself.
Dee Hon
5 years ago
Bruce Alexander is an old prof of mine. Back in the 1980s, he created an experiment called "Rat Park" up at SFU.
His hypothesis was that lab rats in addiction studies get hooked on the drugs they're offered because they're living like, well, caged rats. So Alexander made a fun-filled habitat where his rats could frolic, socialize, and mate.
He tried many ways to get the rats of Rat Park hooked on morphine, including loading the rats' morphine-laced water with sugar, but no dice. Even the rats previously addicted under other conditions weaned themselves off the morphine.
Alexander wrote, "Nothing that we tried instilled a strong appetite for morphine or produced anything that looked like addiction in rats that were housed in a reasonably normal environment."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rat_Park
The point of this, of course, is that addiction is less a biological phenomena than a psychological and sociological one.
The human (or rat) spirit is stronger than the addictive qualities of any drug. It's when that spirit is broken that drugs become a problem.
Ed Seedhouse
5 years ago
And around and around we go.
The benzodiazapenes were suppose to be "non addicting" too. They were used to replace barbiturates which were orignally advertised as being "non addicting". As Heroin was originally developed as a "non addicting" alternative to morphine. Ho hum.
Of course any new drug is likely to exhibit "tolerance", so you must increase the dose to keep the effect the same over time. If that drug is needed to alleviate pain you will inevitably become "addicted" to it.
Which isn't really a problem unless someone starts jacking up the price by controlling the supply, and then defining your resultant behaviour as "sick" or "criminal".
Actually of course we already have, and have had for many years, an excellent herbal medicine that relieves pain effectively. It's called "opium". Being an herb it must, by definition, be perfectly healthful, right? After all it's "natural". Can't possibly be bad for you...
James Burns
5 years ago
Dee Hon wrote: "The point of this, of course, is that addiction is less a biological phenomena than a psychological and sociological one."
Well there isn't really a difference between biology and psychology. The problem is in the identification of the source of the problem. The incorrect source is identified as heroin causing addiction, when in fact it is trauma caused by social conditions that have caused changes in the neurological structures of the brain that result in essentially chronic pain conditions in the form of constant stress, anxiety and eventual depression that is relieved through the use of a narcotic.
Stress, anxiety and depression are as biological as back pain. However, stress, anxiety and depression can also be relieved through a proper change in social conditions, as the rat study mentioned above demonstrates. The brain, having considerable plasticity, will rewire itself when subject to the right environmental conditions. The thing is, it's a lot easier to blame social problems on narcotics, then to recognize that narcotics addiction is merely a symptom of poor social environments which are most prominently caused by bad social policy, or flawed social systems.
The idea that the "spirit" is stronger is a misunderstanding based on notions of vitalism. And the reason it is such a bad notion is that it prevents the recognition of the fact that it is a good environment that has the most significant impact in creating what we see as positive neurobiological behaviour, not a strong "spirit", whatever that is supposed to be. Our biology adapts to the environment it finds itself in, and that's especially true of our brains.
Luckily, we can rewire our brains through our own behaviour using techniques like Mindfullness-Based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. But learning those techniques is itself an environmental pre-condition, as is having a minimally safe, and stable social situation to do that learning in.
Dee Hon
5 years ago
James Burns wrote: "The idea that the "spirit" is stronger is a misunderstanding based on notions of vitalism."
With all due respect, I believe the "misunderstanding" is yours.
Would it make you feel better if I said I meant "spirit" to be taken as a metaphor for the kind of normal brain functioning one would expect under environmental conditions with positive attributes similar to those we've adapted to over millenia of evolution?
I mean really, who (other than animists) actually believes in "rat spirit?"
I think we actually agree on all but my perhaps flagrant use of poetic license.
RickW
5 years ago
I heard that pain is akin to the warning light on the dashboard of your car, and that taking painkillers is akin to cutting the wire to that warning light, instead of getting the problem fixed..........
James Burns
5 years ago
RickW wrote: "I heard that pain is akin to the warning light on the dashboard of your car, and that taking painkillers is akin to cutting the wire to that warning light, instead of getting the problem fixed.........."
Sure but sometimes warning lights come on and stay on even though there is nothing that can be or needs to be fixed. Chronic pain is quite often like that.
RickW
5 years ago
Must be built in Detroit or Ontario............
OneWomanArmy
5 years ago
I think I have a strong 'spirit' because I've kicked an opiate addiction without changing my environment but adapting myself and that involved most certainly my spirit as a human being.I relied on my creative, spiritual part of myself to change ME and how I viewed the environment.
Can mice do that? Or do they need to possess language to do so?
My perceptions and thoughts were re-created by me.
considerthis
5 years ago
And again we come back to something we discussed some time ago, involving adrenaline and cortisone as stress inducing "naturally occuring" chemicals. This also ties in with Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (or as I like to call it, Buddha's little sister). Skills developed in BT reduce the production of adrenaline and cortisone, allowing the practitioner to alter behaviour and effect. I'd love to see what N-type calcium channel blockers do to the production of those, and other stress based bio-chem...
OneWomanArmy
5 years ago
Well, Buddha's little sister is my best friend. See, it works both ways. You can chemically try to change my behaviour or I can re-frame my sensations and perceptions on my own to create the same effect.
However, the population you want to look at is the ones who cannot re-frame things. You have to at least see if they can. And you don't need to do it within addiction. You can simply test them in other ways and see if they are able to reframe.
If they can't then you've got your population that people commonly call 'diseased' with addiction and cannot control it.
I was able to. I had a HUGE habit as well. I wasn't just popping a few percosets a day. I was shooting over 200mg of IV morphine a day.
All of my doctors say I am truly a miracle.