Mediacheck

Why We Fight (for the Internet)

Let them close the Net by metering or throttling, and it's a defeat for sharing, creativity, and human potential.

By Steve Anderson, 23 Mar 2011, TheTyee.ca

InternetLove

The Internet helps us transcend isolation.

Related

I was recently invited to speak at an event put on by Gen Why Media Project called the "Why We Do It Party". What made the event interesting, besides the eclectic mix of speakers, creative performers, and participants, was that speakers were asked to talk about why we do what we do. We were asked to speak about what motivates us, rather than the usual talk about what we and our organizations do, our accomplishments etc.

It was nice being forced to step back from the day-to-day excitement of OpenMedia.ca's Stop The Meter campaign and actually take a moment to remember what got me started in the first place, and reflect on what keeps me engaged and motivated now.

Considering my work, the question really boiled down to why I care about the open and accessible Internet. It was an ideal time to contemplate this question as phone and cable companies had recently stepped up their efforts unleash new Internet usage fees that would fundamentally change how the Internet works. I find the question interesting because I'm sure the answer is different for each one of us.

For some it might be about consuming content of your choice, for others it might be the ability to share your art, to connect with family and friends via skype, download baby pictures, to debate on forums, for research, learning and self development, gaming, to facilitate meet ups around an area of interest, and numerous other activities.

So while I came up with my answer for the Gen Why event, it made me curious as to what others would say if the question were put to them. So I put a call out on my blog and the OpenMedia.ca Facebook page to see what people had to say.

Tool for hope

The answers I got were as diverse as Canadians are themselves. Some common themes were: Benefits to humanity, education, free expression, dissatisfaction with traditional media, and my personal favorite, the Internet is basically everything.

Some people offered touching personal stories: "I am on a disability for brain trauma. I have had the opportunity through the use of online learning and special programs to attain a "B" average in University: Academic writing, Psychology, Anthropology and several courses in Behavioral analysis, and Autism support. My goal is to become a support person for others who may also have challenges. It would mean the loss of my ability to forward my education and be of service to others if I were charged for internet usage as well access."

Others found that the political and empowering dimension of the Internet resonated most: "We are in an information age, where we know more about anything then any previous generation. We can call out the corrupt, we can prove truths, and fight for change. All at our fingertips."

The Internet is also looked at as more of a practical tool for innovation: "My job (a high tech, small, mobile company) flat-out needs the internet to innovate and connect with clients. We are small and just starting up. This would definitely stifle our ability to teleconference, skype, etc with clients."

"As a student in University or College, the Internet is definitely worth saving. Students already pay ridiculous amounts of fees for tuition, and on top of that, books, transportation, food, etc. with little or no help from our Gov't. Making them also PAY more for Internet access is another obstacle for them in obtaining their goals."

Some people feel the Internet is most worth saving because of its ability to make us better as a species: "I think the Internet is important because it has both helped to create/facilitate/flourish a more insightful, compelled, curious, motivated, diversely knowledgeable, productive, and inspired breed of humans." (oh, this is me!)

Others expressed wonderment: "I am a normal adult who grew up in the days before there was any such thing as an Internet. I never would have believed that all this is possible and it has changed the world in both good ways and bad. However, I believe that the Internet has changed the world in at least one very good way -- and that is in our ability to share with each other."

These comments are just the tip of the iceberg and you can check out the rest yourself on Facebook.

Saving the Internet

For me, the efforts to close the open Internet (by metering or throttling) are a war on sharing, a war on creativity, and ultimately a war on human potential. Perhaps I'm a bit too much of a romantic for my own good, but I think the Internet can bring out the best of the human spirit. I think it has the capacity to reflect back at us and encourage us to reach for a more just, engaging, and democratic society.

The Internet itself will not solve the world's problems, but it does help break down barriers between us making it easier to collaborate and self organize. It helps us transcend isolation.

In a world that can feel economically and ecologically precarious, the Internet represents opportunity and hope. Open communication holds the possibility that our ingenuity and creativity could lead to a future that we get to shape and define. It's the freedom to connect in new ways.

Saving the Internet is important to me because it holds the possibility for a better world. Let's not let that possibility slip away.  [Tyee]

4  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • warbler

    1 year ago

    I laugh

    I laugh at the religious-like dogma undertone of such discussions, that seem to imply that before the Internet, humanity was a dark age, devoid of creativity, intellectual freedom and all other things good and noble and democratic.

    Your straw poll finds the following reasons for fighting for the Internet: "Benefits to humanity, education, free expression, dissatisfaction with traditional media, and my personal favorite, the Internet is basically everything."

    Is that so? The Internet is the new elixir, the holy healer that will carry us all out of darkness into the light of liberation.

    Show me the evidence that the Internet has made the earth a better place. Show me the UN indexes before 1990 and after. Show me the exact benefits to humanity you speak of.

    The Internet is "everything." Ah yes, now the Internet is the essential metaphysical stuff of the world, the final cause, which would make Spinoza and Leibniz, among many others, curl with screams of eureka! in their graves.

    Let me propose a radical, controversial Occam's razor type answer to your question of why you fight: Because you're addicted to the medium, perhaps?

    My question is: Why isn't there a serious debate/dialogue on the merits of open access and the Internet? Why is this question presupposed and barely glossed over in doing a great cyber-leap forward?

    Seriously, when was the last time you heard anyone even question the benefits of the Internet, much less that it is "everything"?

  • Booker

    1 year ago

    freedom

    For me, the efforts to close the open Internet (by metering or throttling) are a war on sharing, a war on creativity, and ultimately a war on human potential.

    It's really just a war on your wallet -- the other things are side-effects.

    I think that the telco's should have to disclose exactly what the bandwidth demands they are experiencing actually cost. If someone is downloading all of their XXX movies and I'm not, then I don't feel like sharing the cost for that bandwidth. They should pay more if it costs more to deliver. But I don't know if it actually does cost a lot more or not.

    Unfortunately the current fad is to cut government (or at least cut the revenue that comes from the wealthy), so government regulation of the telcos is going to be difficult. If the free market rules, kiss the open internet goodbye and open your wallet.

  • Sooke

    1 year ago

    Free everything for everybody!

    And while we're add it, lets stop metering water and electricity! Metering them only forces people to keep their homes cold and dark, and makes them stink from lack of bathing.

    Free everything for everybody!

  • DC604

    1 year ago

    confounding the issues

    I admit to being somewhat ignorant of the technical details in this rather technical world of the internet; its delivery, its cost and its access. But it seems to me that the fundamental problem is that however much we may derive profound benefits from "the internet", it is not itself "freedom" or "justice" or even "expression". It is an actual 'thing'; it exists on actual chips and circuits, wires and satellites and processors. We forget this fact when we mindlessly throw up a google screen at our desk and casually access this vast world of information and expression.

    The issue, therefore, is Who Pays for the Internet? Like our roads and plumbing, it has to be payed for. I for one, believe that this new "usage based fees" system of funding is a wrongheaded idea. It should be fought, and we should retain our system of flat-rate user fees.

    This is an argument of economics, however, and not, it would seem to me, one of keeping the internet 'open', or of fighting to 'save the internet'. Of all the wonderful things the internet has done for me or anyone else, it has done so while being paid for in specific ways by specific people. It is delivered by specific companies and institutions. It is a product, and indeed, with regards to bandwidth and circuitry, it is a product in limited quantities. Supply and Demand are both unavoidable factors. Even its "openness" is a technical matter. People without the $$ to pay $30/mo for internet service, can tell you right now that the internet is not 'universally accessible'. It's no more "open" than cable television, which I don't have, because I don't want to pay the minimum $20+/mo for a pile of channels I won't watch.

    So "the fight" is purely one of economics, and very technical at that.
    There is an endless list of products that I pay for 'per usage' or 'per quantity', rather than a monthly flat rate for 'unlimited consumption'. This includes such fundamental and life-sustaining goods as my electricity and even my food! I just happen to think that the internet, like roads, is a 'good' that we all receive more efficiently and beneficially, not to mention equally, through a flat-rate system, rather than a usage-based system. That economic and technical issue is what we should be debating isn't it, rather than whether the internet is 'worth saving' or 'why' it should be?

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.