What's in an Acronym?
Undefined EAJs send journalist OTE.
You have to spell it out.
[Editor's note: We've had a few frustrated readers call us out on this lately. Consider our publishing this a sign we wish to make amends!]
General Grammatical Standards (GGS) demand that when authors use Esoteric Acronym Jargon (EAJ), they write out the meaning in full Upon First Usage (UFU). The GGS manual points out that readers not from the author's profession may come upon an undefined EAJ for the first time and not know What the Fuck it Means (WFM).
For example, a Non-Clique Reader (NCR) may come across the term, "Urban projects in an FSR range of 3 to 5," and because of lack of generalized education or simple ignorance, may not know WFM.
The confused NCR may, for example be an accountant familiar with "FSR" as a Financial Systems Review, a Financial Strength Rating, a Financial Services Roundtable, a Financial Services Representative, or, in Australia, the now famous Financial Services Reform. Perhaps our accountant thinks FSR represents a Fixed Price Redetermination or a Forecast Stock Return. A US Air Force accountant might mistake the undefined EAJ as a Fund Summary Record.
Perhaps the NCR is a technician, for whom FSR indicates a Full Spectrum Recorder, Frequency Scan Radar, a Force-Sensitive Resistor, a Free Spectral Range, a Feedback Shift Register, a Frequency-Shifted Reference, a Fractional Synthetic Rate, or a type of Fluoro-silicone Rubber. Perhaps our NCR is a mathematician, for whom an FSR is a Fourier Series Representation.
A surgeon might think FSR refers to Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy or Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery. A pilot might conjure the Flight Safety Rules.
If the context is urban and rural planning, as indicated by the phrase "urban projects," perhaps an FSR is a Forest Service Road, a Feasibility Study Report, a Field Service Report, Flood Study Report, or Farming System Research. If the writer is an architect, perhaps he or she is referring to a Facilities Support Requirement, a Facility Safety Review, or a Floor Space Ratio.
Without having seen the proper contextual meaning spelled out, our poor NCR remains confused. A reader from Norway might think an FSR is a Fjernskriver Ratt. A Swedish reader might believe we are talking about their Foundation for Strategic Research. In Denver, Colorado they might assume we are referring to the Family Support Registry. Perhaps the reader is a geopolitical specialist who thinks we are discussing the Former Soviet Republic, a German housewife who listens to Frühstyxradio, or a simple Canadian looking for a Full Service Restaurant. God forbid, our confused NCR might be a rap music fan who can only imagine this means the Futuristic Sex Robotz.
In any case, the GGS remains clear on this standard: Always spell out the EAJ on first usage in any paper or essay, so that a reader from another discipline, or no discipline at all, knows WFM. These undefined EAJ can send even a seasoned reporter OTE (Over the Edge).
Related Tyee stories:
- The Focused Life
Please tell me how to live it. I'll try to pay attention. - Writing the Jazz Way
- The Writing's on the Wall (photo essay)
A photographer shoots what city officials hope to crush.



JordanRoszmann
03-07-2009
Inconsistent Acronym Typo (AIT)
Fun article, but EAJ morphed into AEJ after the second paragraph.
A global search and replace should fix it.
David Beers
03-07-2009
Thanks Jordan
So...we run a story poking fun at our need to improve our copy editing -- and it's got a major copy editing flaw throughout. Would you believe me if I said this was a test? Didn't think so!
We'll fix it!
bat3man
04-07-2009
another approach
Perhaps another way to tackle (mis)use of acronyms would be to simply use fewer of them. Even when an acronym is spelled out at its first use, an uninitiated reader can easily forget the acronym's meaning by the end of an article (or even by the next use of the acronym).
I know, I know: "Esoteric Acronym Jargon" is a lot more difficult to type - 20 more keystrokes!!!! - and much more costly in terms of web-hosting, than "EAJ."
Earthly Presence
05-07-2009
What's in an Acronym
Great article. Three Letter Acronyms (TLA's)have become a part of our culture. Whether it's LOL, IBM, or WTF. There are many we now encorporate with ease into our everyday language mostly because we seem to need to do everything easier and faster. I'm just always perplexed though when we verbally use ones that are harder to say than what they stand for like .... www. That is 9 sylables compared to 3 if you say world wide web.
Funny
pegres
06-07-2009
No acronyms in this article
Sorry to spoil your entire article, but there are no acronyms in it. An acronym is a "a word formed from the initial letters or groups of letters of words" (from Random House dictionary), such as OPEC, NAFTA, or scuba. TLA (sic) is not an acronym. It does, however, have a name, and that is an "initialism". Acronyms are spoken as a word, and initialisms are spoken as letters.
Of course, people will make fun of this comment as pedantry, and will say something to the effect of English being an evolving language and that meanings change through usage, and eventually every single usage error in the world will become acceptable and everyone will speak their own version of the language and no one will be able to understand each other because they will use the same word to mean completely different things.
zorya
06-07-2009
what is an acronym
it may have changed when I was on vacation, but there was a time when you could pronounce an acronym as a word, like CUPE or NASCAR, and a recent Google search indicates that's still the most-common definition [while we're at it, how come you don't hyphenate double adjectives, such as in 'major copy-editing flaw'?]
I've never considered abbreviations such as EAJ or CBC to be acronyms
Jay Currie
07-07-2009
Unintentional
I just set up a company called OnPage Media.
OPM
It's addictive.