Mediacheck

A Chance to Open up Canada's Wireless Market

Digital TV transition clears the way to 'WiFi on steroids.'

By Michael Geist, 24 Feb 2009, TheTyee.ca

Digital TV people

Who'll inherit analog TV's old spectrum?

Canada finds itself lagging more than two years behind the United States in the transition from analog to digital television broadcasting, a process that could leave millions of Canadians without access to over-the-air television signals. While the elimination of "free TV" would spark outrage in many communities, the most harmful effect of the slow migration will be felt in the competitiveness of Canadian telecommunications, not broadcasting.

The link between the digital television transition and telecommunications stems from the freed-up spectrum that will become available as broadcasters abandon their analog transmissions. This spectrum -- known as the 700 MhZ spectrum -- opens up a host of possibilities for new innovation, competitors and open Internet access.

The 700 MhZ spectrum will lead to another spectrum auction that could open the door to further entrants into the Canadian wireless market. In fact, some speculate that some would-be bidders stayed out of the most recent AWS spectrum auction (which raised over $4 billion in revenue for the government) in the hope of grabbing some of the MhZ spectrum since it is viewed as technically superior. It more easily penetrates walls, for example, making it ideal for delivering wireless high-speed Internet services.

Industry Minister Tony Clement has the chance to dramatically reshape the Canadian wireless market by establishing a bold policy approach to the auction. For example, as pressure mounts to open up the Canadian market to foreign competition, this auction could provide the entry point. By permitting foreign investors to bid for majority stakes in 700 MHZ spectrum, the government could simultaneously invite increased competition and promote new investment in the Canadian marketplace.

Fill up the 'white spaces'

Moreover, the rules governing the use of the spectrum will also attract considerable attention. In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission has adopted some "open access" requirements, mandating certain openness standards in the use of this spectrum. For consumers tired of the "walled garden" approach of current providers that use both contracts and technology to lock-in consumers, open spectrum policies would spur new innovation and heightened competition by facilitating greater consumer mobility and promote the introduction of new services not tied to a single wireless provider.

In addition to the auctioned spectrum, there is the potential for further unused spectrum to be made available for public use. Known as "white spaces," this spectrum was previously used by broadcasters to ensure that their analog broadcasts did not interfere with one another.

A consortium of companies, including Google, Microsoft and Dell, have argued that this spectrum can be safely used for other purposes. Rather than auctioning the white spaces, they recently persuaded the FCC that the public interest would be better served by allowing anyone to make use of it -- as is the case today with spectrum used for wifi signals. This would allow for the introduction of new services over the white spaces, such as broadband in rural communities or, in the words of Google co-founder Larry Page, "wifi on steroids."

While broadcasters lodged objections to the white space plan, claiming that the new uses could interfere with their digital broadcasts, last week the FCC formally gave the green light to the use of WSDs or white space devices.

We're stuck at the starting line

As the U.S. marches along on this policy front, Canada has not even left the starting gate.

Indeed, it appears increasingly likely that the U.S. approach will be fully implemented by the time Canada gets its act together. While that points to a carbon copy approach, it will ultimately fall to Clement to make the call and to set in motion policies that could change the way Canadians access broadcast, telecom, and Internet services.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

5  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • seth

    3 years ago

    why wait?

    While White spaces and freed up 700 mhz spectrum does indeed present opportunities for open access wireless, Canada Neocon's Iggy, Harpo and the CRTC do not believe in the concept.

    The spectrum will be sold to Big Telecom or their sidekicks (to be bought out later) and the spectrum basically left to languish.

    A company called Meraki using 2.4 ghz wireless G technology has been able to unwire San Franscisco and has offered to do the same for any city at a bargain cost of $40K a sq mile - ie $1 a household one time for the City of Vancouver. Imagine no more telephone/internet or wireless charge after the City pays out one buck on your behalf. Meraki is charging many times the actual cost of their technology, so using the same concept the $40 would drop to $4K if the City did it for itself.

    New Wireless N technology has been shown to be even more effective and only slightly more expensive.

    Power companies with most plans for Smart metering have to build a wireless network covering the country which could be used by citizens at almost no additional cost.

    What is stopping us is the utter dependence of provincial and municipal politicians on campaign donations from Big Telecom. Given that the technology would basically wipe out the phone company no expense is spared when it comes to buying your city councils, mayors MLA's and of course El Gordo.

  • shabbaranks

    3 years ago

    Blinded by the Technological Light

    There is already significant evidence and spirited debate about the long term health implications of wireless exposure, so I find it bothersome that this article doesn't address the potential impracticality that "wireless on steroids" may bring.

    Great, I'm able to download the Nutty Professor in 3 minutes from the on-line video store, but I get bowel cancer along with my laffs.

    That same signal that "more easily penetrates walls" also more easily penetrates our bodies?

    Sorry for being off topic, please continue with discussion related to mismanaged government policy and the need for foreign interests to create a more competitive market!? Did I read that on the Tyee?

  • seth

    3 years ago

    cancer

    The 700 mhz band is already all around you. Its called television (UHF). Wireless data is just another use for it.

    The signal level sent to your brain when you hold a cell phone to your ear is tens of thousands of times higher than being in the same room as Wireless data. I'd advise a headset when using your cell.

  • alive

    3 years ago

    plain greed

    What exactly is on TV that needs to be distributed more effeciently?

    To me this is just another attempt to create ways to milk the public for money on a steady monthly basis!

    The idea seem to be to have every citizen tied down with monthly obligations to as many corporations as possible; and making it impossible to live without.

  • packrat2

    3 years ago

    wireless

    heavens, i do love the tyee comments.

    my rant is on the patient bubble...
    from net neutrality to monsanto.

    big momma s'mother time... not twisted sister news.

    given a propensity to hand out material, then declare it top secret and criminalize you,
    I see wireless as just another way to supersaturate the communications with bugs.

    big-brother bugs, thanks.

    wireless? Until it is demonstrated as useful method of promoting the elite's agenda's.. (while canwest crashes and burns)

    it won't get acted on.
    unfortunately.

    packrat

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.