Life

In Jerusalem, Revelations

What I learned gabbing my way through the Old City.

By Steve Burgess, 2 Jun 2008, TheTyee.ca

Saddam Hussein

Saddam: Still alive?

Saddam lives! That's just one of the startling secrets to be discovered in the ancient streets of the Holy City. Jerusalem offers plenty more revelations -- tales of the wisdom of Cleopatra, the fighting spirit of Texas, and just maybe a bit of genuine hope. Or maybe not.

First, the Saddam bulletin. While walking in Jerusalem's Old City, I happened to notice -- as who wouldn't -- a couple of pictures of the former Iraqi dictator on the wall of a little grocery store. I was shy about asking the proprietor about them. I needn't have been. "Yes, we all love him," the young man enthused. "He is king of the Arabs. He will return. He is not dead."

But -- the hanging video? "All faked," the young man assured me. Then he pointed to two Saddam portraits on the wall. "Only one of these is Saddam," he says. "Can you tell which?"

I couldn't. And it is true that Hussein was known to use doubles. So, I asked: was it a double in the hanging video? "No, no," he explained cheerfully, "that was all phony. No one was hung."

So there you go. Like the King of Rock and Roll, the King of the Arabs lives on. Add him to the list of Mideast messiahs holding return tickets with an open date.

More revelations

It may not be news to you that Jerusalem is a city thoroughly steeped in religion. But until you arrive as a lone wanderer, a secular free agent unprotected by tour guides or gangs of hymn-singing accomplices, you don't realize just how it plays out on the ground. In my case I mean shortly after touching down at the airport at 4:30 a.m. and boarding the mini-bus for the trip from Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion Airport into Jerusalem. A Jewish pilgrim from England promptly plunks down beside me and begins a sort of stream-of-consciousness ramble about the Holy Land. My seatmate might be described as a sort of holy fool, but the holy part would be generous. He's harmless enough, and his ramble is intermittently interesting -- for instance, the revelation that since the Romans could not destroy the sacred Western Wall of the Second Temple, some Jews believe that even an atomic explosion would leave it standing. But his credibility suffers when he makes reference to the great philosophers who influenced Judaism, such as Aristotle -- and Cleopatra.

He talks nonstop until, thanks be to Jehovah, he disembarks. It won't be the last sermon I get. One night in the Old City as shops were closing, a bearded Palestinian gentleman begins a vigorous pitch to sell me an old-fashioned Bedouin-style coffee pot. At some point he abruptly tacks into a general lecture on Islamic philosophy and worldview, a peroration that goes on for at least 20 minutes with hardly a breath. "I like you," he says. "You are more open-minded than many."

I have spoken less than a dozen words while nodding regularly.

Faith and T-shirt slogans

Although Jews and Muslims make up most of the populace, most of the local souvenirs have converted to Christianity. To say "Holy crap" in Jerusalem is merely to describe the merchandise. I've also seen one shop with plaques reading "Don't Mess With Texas" and "Go Longhorns." Also "Shalom, Y'all." My two favourites so far: a T-shirt reading "Guns 'n Moses," and another with those laughing cartoon figures usually associated with the phrase "You want it when?" only in this case the slogan is: "Peace in the Mideast?"

After religion, that's always the hot topic around here. To chat with folks on both sides of the Jewish/Muslim divide is to swing between despair and optimism like an undecided superdelegate. One Friday afternoon in the Old City as a mass of Muslims crammed the narrow streets on their way home for the most important of weekly prayers, I chat with a genial old man named Abu Abed. Sitting in a wheelchair greeting passersby, he gives me yet another long tutorial on Islam and regional history. His is much more interesting than previous lectures though, and ultimately more revealing. He admits what many Israelis always said -- that Yasser Arafat was a disastrous leader for the Palestinian cause. But when I ask hypothetically whether the deal Arafat is said to have rejected at Camp David in 2000 (reportedly most of the West Bank, all of Gaza, plus sovereignty over East Jerusalem) would be accepted by Palestinians today, he pauses a moment before answering. "I think no," he says. "I think most Palestinians would say no."

He pulls his glasses from his shirt pocket. "If a man steals your glasses and then offers you back one arm, will you agree? No! You want them back."

Today, he agrees, Israel and America are strong. But why make a deal now when the wheel is always turning? "Once the crusaders were strong," he says. "And the Soviet Union was strong. They are gone now."

A fascinating if somewhat depressing discussion. But not the last I would have.

'Combatants for Peace'

Next day in the Christian quarter of the Old City I meet Ibrahim Bader, the Palestinian proprietor of The Coral Beach, a carpet and jewelry shop (where I got a great carpet deal, really). Also in the shop is his friend and fellow jewelry merchant, Nurit Steinfeld. As Bader looks on with a little smile, she tells me how he had been hounded out of his previous location by the new security wall and increasingly stringent checkpoints that strangled his business. "Yet here he is," she says of Bader, "still hopeful, still in Israel, making a contribution to the community."

Steinfeld herself has gained hope from a group called Combatants for Peace, former fighters from both sides who now work for peaceful solutions. Members include a woman who was a failed suicide bomber, now working for rapprochement in the region.

"In order to make people want peace we have to make them comfortable," Steinfeld says. "We have to win hearts. We haven't been doing that."

"These women are exceptional," Bader later says of Steinfeld and her friends. "There are not many like them."

In my very brief time here, that's been my sense of it too. But it was good to meet the few.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

4  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Jeffrey J.

    3 years ago

    Who has the Power to Make Peace

    Although North America's media monopoly says otherwise, assessing responsibility for an event between more than one party is universal. All systems of justice have a highly regulated method of apportioning responsibility between various parties. Thus, it is trite law to apply these principles to the war in the Middle East, and ask, who is most responsible. That is key to any event involving more than one entity. But steadfastly ignored when one of the parties is able to influence public opinion.

    In this case, as many, many Isreali peace activists have pointed out, Israel has the most power to determine an outcome between itself and Palestine. This does not mean Palestinian leaders don't also have obligations. They do, and they may or may not be discharging their obligations. But the more important issue in any evaluation of justice is what has the more powerful entity done to create the problem, or address the problem.

    The most intelligent and articulate peace movement in Israel is Gush Shalom, led by the indefatigable Uri Avnery, a former member of the Israel government (the Knesset), a former Israeli soldier in the 1948 war, and a brilliant philosopher (see website below).
    http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1212277355/
    It is clear since 9-11 that all concerned North American's need to understand why some Arab nationals have taken up arms against the US. Why indeed?

    The answer is universally plainly stated, and almost universally ignored by the North American media.

    The complaint is about the occupation of Palestine by Israel, and the US support of same. That's the complaint.

    So it is up to us to understand this complaint, and after careful consideration of the facts, respond accordingly.

    Then, one day, we might have peace in the Middle East.

    Great article!

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    Jeffrey.

    Since it seems that there is no acceptable way to divvy up the territories, the only workable solution would be for both to live under one flag, in a multiculural state.

    However, it is my understanding that the main roadblock there is religion - namely whose precepts would form the basis for law, with neither Rabbis nor Mullahs willing to give up turf.

  • Skookum1

    3 years ago

    There was one...

    Quote:
    Since it seems that there is no acceptable way to divvy up the territories, the only workable solution would be for both to live under one flag, in a multiculural state.

    The Ottoman Sultanate was just like that, at least up until Egypt and the other Arab countries helped bring it to its knees, then its demise. It was in the Sultan's interest to protect his minorities, and it's part of the history of the Sultanate how many times the ulema (religious class) and janissaries pushed for full Islamization and/or held back any kind of progression into being a modern state.

    It gives context now to understand that it was the Wahabbi sect out of Saudi Arabia which dismantled what remained of Ottoman control in the Levant (with British help, partly in the form of one Lawrence of Arabia - Laurence?). Ottoman rule had always respected religioius rights, particulary of Peoples of the Book (Jews and Christians) in all their many flavours (unlike in the West where heretics were hunted down and had nasty things done to them).

    All this gets back to a discussion in another thread about how democratic/mass rule principles don't always work well, particularly for minorities, and why rulers, monarchical/dynastic or otherwise, are one way to at least have a chance of doing the necessary balancing act.

    The Sultans needed their Jews, and needed their Armenians and Greeks and others, and made them part of the state as well as society throughout the Empire; as also with other groups; poitics over who got the keys of the Holy Places (among the Western Powers) was a bargaining-chip with the West at times....it's interesting also that Jewish populations in the Holy Land didn't grow or migrations to there just didnt' happen; I don't think they were against the rules; the Zionist movement hadn't yet been born in its "take back the land" format.

    I'm not saying restoring the Sultanate or any other kind of regional state is a good idea, and while I'd like to think there's a solution I think the knots have to get a little more knotted up before anybody brings out the necessary Gordian sword (as Osama is said to fancy himself doing, and Georgie-poo made his own stab at).

  • ME2

    3 years ago

    Yeah, we're gonna wait a while.

    I recall reading, Skookum1, that prior to the Inquisition, Spain was a very prosperous and liberal Kingdom, in which Jews, Christians and Muslims lived very comfortably together.

    That didn't suit the Pope, however, who wanted a Catholic Europe. And thus the Inquisition and the end of tolerance, particularly in Spain.

    And it doesn't seem that the Church, and Christianity in general, has changed much.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.