Artsculture

Less Gas, More Ass

'You Never Bike Alone' suggests a new, bike-based world order.

By Dorothy Woodend, 1 Jun 2007, TheTyee.ca

Bike aloft 2

The rise of Critical Mass.

"Less gas, more ass!" might just come to be the credo of the new world order. It's not the most soul stirring of phrases, but the sentiment it implies is critical, Critical Mass that is.

Robert Alstead's film, You Never Bike Alone, documents the rise of Critical Mass in Vancouver. The basic premise is that on the last Friday of every month, a group of pedal powered people assemble and ride through the city in an effort to reclaim the streets. Critical Mass first raised its gnarly head from the asphalt of San Francisco, a city that might not seem well suited to cycling given that most of it is perpendicular, but the notion soon spread, popping up in cities around the world. Alstead's documentary, assembled from footage shot over the last ten years, follows the path of how cycling came to be a viable, nay, necessary means of transportation in the city.

In Vancouver, the cycling tsunami started small. Richard Campbell (of BEST which stands for Best Environmentally Sound Transportation) organized some of the earliest rides. One of these, called "Taming the Lions," involved pointing out the dangers of riding on bridges by sending a group of cyclists into the lanes of traffic on the Lion's Gate Bridge. Many of participants in this ride expected to get arrested, but the Vancouver bike cops actually ended up ticketing drivers on the bridge, who were taking runs at the cyclists.

Peace over protest

When Critical Mass was still finding its sea legs, the Vancouver Police often found themselves in the embarrassing position of arresting cyclists who had done little more than participate in the ride. (Scenes of activists like Jaggi Singh being thrown into a police paddy wagon are particularly telling). The VPD finally learned to look the other way, and let the riders ride. Harder to convince, however, were car and SUV drivers. Road rages incidents in which cars crushed bicycles with impunity scared people away, and at one point in the early days, there were only eight people taking part.

Unlike other cities (such as Edinburgh), where the confrontational elements eventually overtook the event, Vancouver organizers chose to emphasize the peaceful aspects of protest. People still got bumped and butted by cars, but more often than not, they simply turned the other cheek. This was especially effective in the World Naked Bike Ride. Conrad Schmidt (founder of the Work Less Party), who initially organized the Naked Bike Ride, is a prime example of a well-spoken advocate who simply cast an idea upon the worldwide waves and let it float. It doesn't hurt that he also looked very good naked. The success of World Naked Bike Ride, in which penis and pudenda power won hearts and other things, isn't hard to understand -- there is something exquisitely joyful about a huge pack of cyclists riding about naked. It just looks insanely fun.

Some of the most pertinent problems of modern urban living are represented in You Never Bike Alone, but it's the underlying spirit of self-directed action that makes the film a lovely piece of agitprop. It isn't didactic, nor proselytizing, but blunt and straightforward. The people interviewed seem so sane, so reasonable and so utterly practical that I wanted to ride off in the sunset with all of them. The sight of so many people engaged in a happy act of civil disobedience makes my heart swell, but it's the sense of community that can go grow out of something as simple as riding bikes that prevails in the film.

Bike riders constitute a huge, and often radically diverse bunch of people in Vancouver, and the documentary presents just a few of these groups with a benevolent gaze. From the chopper freaks (the MC3 Collective) who build machines that only vaguely resemble bikes, to Clitoral Mass, to Artists Against War, a number of different organizations came into being, as a direct result of Critical Mass. But it was involving the larger population of the city that proved a tipping point. Ordinary folks and their kids swelled the numbers of the ride, and the small motley band that caromed through the streets grew into thousands of souls moving through the city like a river.

BC bike bravado

Other cities might have experienced the same idea, but in Vancouver, bikes seem to fit particularly well. The emphasis on cycling continues across the Lower Mainland with the 25 kilometre stretch of bike route dubbed Central Valley Greenway, which will connect Vancouver, Burnaby and New Westminster.

While former city councillors Gordon Price and Bonnie Fenton provide thoughtful analysis in the film about the trials and errors of organizing the flow of cars, goods and bikes in and out of Vancouver, the issue of sustainable transit is far from settled. Despite the growth of bike routes, suburban sprawl and traffic density continue to be something of a twin-headed hydra. The province has proposed the idea of a bike friendly city by 2010, while at the same time, the Gateway Project continues like a juggernaut. The 18 months of public consultation initially proposed for the Gateway Project end this July. The movie touches on the inadvisability of a city trying to build its way out of congestion, and the province's plan to do exactly that with the twinning of the Port Mann Bridge, but exactly how things will unfold remains to be seen. The screening of You Never Bike Alone, square in the middle of Bike-to-Work Week (May 28 - June 3), and leading off Bike Month in June, could not be more timely.

Bike routes and greenways are all lovely and fine, but before we get too self-congratulatory about sustainability and such, other parts of the world are only too eager to ditch bikes and get into cars (China in particular). All the politicians' yapping about green-this and green-that that most often seems like an excuse to spend more money. Garret Keizer says it far better than I, in a fiery polemic in the June Issue of Harper's Magazine entitled "Climate, Class, and Claptrap." Writes the fine Mr. Keizer: "If one can be forgiven for applying base political considerations to such a sublimely moral issue: you do not repair the climate of an entire planet without staggering sacrifices, and people will not elect to make staggering sacrifices unless the burden is shared with something like parity." Getting rid of cars, and devising a city that promotes bike use is only the barest beginning.

'Olden days'

My son Louis keeps asking me about the "olden days," as he calls them, a time when video games hadn't been yet invented, and computers were merely a blip on the horizon. I tell him that when his grandma was a kid, she rode her horse everywhere, or when his great-grandma was a girl, people still drove their wagons into town. The fact that the world has shrunk considerably within the space of two generations might seem bleak, but it gives you pause for thought. It can go the other way, maybe just as quickly, a point that You Never Bike Alone also makes. A decade or so ago the idea that smoking could effectively vanish was unthinkable, and perhaps, the same might come to be true of cars.

The unequivocal need to change, I mean really change, the way we live in the world is pretty evident. The message is clear -- saving this finite and fragile place will require much hard work and human sweat. Mass ass or ass mass. It's either one way or the other.

You Never Bike Alone screens this Friday (June 1st) at the Cinemark Tinseltown in Vancouver, and is followed by a Q&A with the director. The You Never Bike Alone website has info about screenings around the province

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

15  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • alive

    4 years ago

    good weather only

    yeah right, and it never rains in Vancouver!

  • southdeltawalker

    4 years ago

    Gateway coalition and other info.

    As the article mentions the Gateway project. Here are links to
    Gateway Coalition of those opposed to Gateway
    http://www.stopgateway.ca/index.htm

    and great new video of what will happen to Delta if the South Fraser Perimeter Road-SFPR [part of Gateway} goes through.
    hthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?

    We are fighting for our communities here please help us.

  • ov

    4 years ago

    World Naked Bike Ride

    You may have seen the less gas, more ass posters around town advertising the fourth annual Naked Bike Ride to happen next Saturday on June 9th. The WNBR was started here in Vancouver. More than thirty cities around the world with thousands (maybe tens of thousands) participating, the movement seems to be doubling every year.

    www.WorldNakedBikeRide.org for more info.

  • renimal

    4 years ago

    WorldNakedBikeRide

    The World Naked Bike Ride is June 9th
    www.worldnakedbikeride.org.

    It is a real eyecatcher for pedestrians and drivers and it shows just how seriously committed bikers are to relaying the message of-bikes are better. Be as bare as you dare.

  • doggone

    4 years ago

    32?

    Last sunday we attended the 32? annual "Human Race" held for yoe those many years on Yellow Point Road near Ladysmith on Vancouver Island. My grandaughter, Clio, was first overall (on a bicycle) and her grand uncle, Bill was second overall on his poor old legs attempting to keep an eye on her. Most vehicle drivers were courteous to this slow moving line of walking motley crew - some pushing baby strollers and some walking with canes.
    We never advertize but if you happen to be in the Yellow Point area next year on the last Sunday in May you are welcome to join the "Human Race"

  • RickW

    4 years ago

    How 'bout "Less GAB, and

    How 'bout "Less GAB, and more ABS" ? Otherwise, it sounds as though we are expected to hook our way around towm........

  • jrb

    4 years ago

    a poor way to go about seeking understanding

    i haven't seen the documentary, but i've seen the critical mass in action and i can't fathom how delaying motorists' commutes home on friday afternoons is ever going to foster any feelings of goodwill toward the act of cycling.

    i'm a cyclist myself and all i see in vancouver now is more and more ridiculous cycling behavior along the lines of critical mass. i often walk along broaway, between cambie and granville, and am amazed at how many unhelmeted cyclists are choosing to ride along broadway, rather than the much safer designated adjacent cycling routes on 10th or 7th.

    these cyclists are often also riding in the broadway traffic after dark while wearing dark clothing and with no lights on their bicycles.

    i try to do the right things, but i'm no 'activist'. it seems to me the so many of the various self-described activists in this city, including lots of the critical mass crew, are little more than whiney, self-important poseurs.

    wear a helmet, use designated safe routes whenever possible, use front and rear lights, wear visible clothing, and use hand signals if you want respect. forget about getting naked and pissing people off. that's not the way to get respect.

  • Eternalux

    4 years ago

    JRB

    Hi JRB,

    I appreciate what you're saying but as one of those riders on Broadway (not usually naked, though :-), i feel the need to explain why i'm there. The truth is, i feel safer there. Let me explain.

    While i'm grateful for those designated bike routes through the city and love the Adanac bike route, those are also the places where cars fly through stop signs without noticing them. I've seen this happen on numerous occasions. The odds, however, of someone doing the same on Broadway is highly unlikely because a) the flow of traffic cues them to slow down and stop at lights and b) they are more aware of cross streets and cross traffic because they can get into a serious accident by running through those.

    Just like any car, i have a right to choose whatever route suits me. I pay my taxes (and am a firm believer in doing so). I choose Broadway and other large arteries. I'm not whiney about it. I wear a helmet. I try to be as visible as possible, but please don't imply that i'm breaking the law or ettiquette by not staying to the cycling routes (or the back of the bus, in another context). :-)

  • Countrytype

    4 years ago

    A poorer way to seek understanding

    Would be for drivers to behave as though this once monthly parade during the sparse traffic of a Friday afternoon were a terrible imposition. Come on, it's like a parade! When I'm cycling and can't cross Kingsway for the traffic at small intersections more often than not for almost 10 minutes, I take a deep breath and deal with it. Yes, I'm a driver too some of the time.

    Yes, not everyone can cycle, but yes, more people sure could if they would give it a chance. I'm of couch potato appearance, but I'm still able to bike from downtown to Steveston in under 1.5 hours, and most commutes are shorter or could use some transit to speed up significantly.

    And, even on days when I dread the planned bike commute, it usually makes me feel better.

    Critical mass is not the be all - end all of the pro cycling movement, but it is actually one fun social gathering. We don't deny hockey and football watchers the right to crowd at the stadium, so why would we begrudge cyclists a far less frequent event that also is relatively mildly inconvenient to drivers?

  • Stump

    4 years ago

    confusing the issue

    You can fit a dozen bikes in the space a car needs. On congested streets, who is holding up whose right to travel? Why does a higher top speed capability infer privilege?

    "wear a helmet, use designated safe routes whenever possible, use front and rear lights, wear visible clothing, and use hand signals if you want respect. forget about getting naked and pissing people off. that's not the way to get respect."

    Using this logic would suggest that the wealth of bad drivers out there demands an immediate moratorium on road improvements until drivers learn safe driving habits.

    Disconnect the two (behaviour and infrastructure). Safe cycling facilities should not be a reward, they are as much as right as any highway amenity offered to car users.

  • Budd Campbell

    4 years ago

    Why do cyclists threaten pedestrians?

    Why do cyclists threaten pedestrians in downtown Vancouver? They regularly ride on sidewalks and cruise through crosswalks, regardless that they are filled with people on foot. As a general rule they are aggressive, dangerous and rude, always ready to swear violently at any pedestrian who has the balls to question their actions.

    One dark morning two winters ago I was nearly run flat in a cross walk where I had the walk signal and the cyclist, wearing all-black gear to show off his fitness fascist fetish, had a solid red light for several seconds before my walk signal came on.

    The article is, as one would expect, completely dishonest about transportation policies. As everyone knows, the Port Mann and Gateway projects will intall new cycling facilities that previously did not exist. But the official cycling lobby, completely controlled by Vancouver City residents, couldn't give a damn about improved cycling facilities for people they contemptuously regard as second-class citizens in the suburbs, and don't want a nickel of their tax dollars squandered there. What is worse is that these ideological idiots don't realize, or say they don't, that the only place cyclists are going to find a sympathetic potential ally in their search for serious resources for major bike route facilities is from motorists and truckers who also need to loosen the infrastructure purse strings.

    Stump's claim that a dozen cyclists can fit in the same amount of road space as one car is just a bit exaggerated, by a factor of two or more. For the sake of safety and comfort, four to six would be more like it. But the point really is that any serious bike route intended to carry major, long-distance, two-way cycle traffic would need to be about as wide as a two lane roadway, that is, about 25 to 30 feet.

  • Stump

    4 years ago

    how many cyclists....

    You are forgetting the space needed between cars (the two second rule). My estimate is if anything, on the low end of the scale.

    "As a general rule they are aggressive, dangerous and rude, always ready to swear violently at any pedestrian who has the balls to question their actions. "

    Bollocks.

  • Budd Campbell

    4 years ago

    What speed are the cars/bikes travelling at?

    You need some space between the cyclists as well. The relative space needs of cars and bikes would depend on what speeds each were going, but I recognize that it would be more than four to six bikes. You would still need a bikeway about the width of a two lane roadway for serious, mass travel by bicycle.

    I have no idea what the word "bollocks" means, but I stand by my description of Vancouver bike commuters. They are aggressive, dangerous, and rude in regard to pedestrians on sidewalks and crosswalks. I am speaking from experience as I tried to point out.

    After the episode where I was nearly run flat in a cross walk, and after a pair of episodes where I was sworn at and even threatened with violence by cyclists, I wrote Emails to leaders of cycling associations. They all took the same line as Stump, total denial that there is any general problem, just one or two bad apples the same as any other group.

    People need to face reality. A fair percentage of people riding bikes are people who lost their driver's licences for drunk driving or other dangerous behaviour.

  • Stump

    4 years ago

    Reality

    Quote:
    People need to face reality. A fair percentage of people riding bikes are people who lost their driver's licences for drunk driving or other dangerous behaviour.

    Can you come up with anything resembling a proof that would take this rather bold statement and move it from fantasy to "reality"?

  • Budd Campbell

    4 years ago

    ...from fantasy to "reality"?

    Can you come up with anything resembling a proof that would take this rather bold statement and move it from fantasy to "reality"?

    A proof? Do you mean some official ICBC statistic? No.

    But it surely must be obvious to anyone who watches the downtown bike commuters that many of these people are the same irresponsible rage-aholics who were previously misbehaving on four wheels. I guess pushing them down to just two wheels amounts to damage limitation or harm reduction.

    I ride my bike recreationally along dikes in the Ridge-Meadows area. I don't ride on sidewalks where there are pedestrians. But people who insist on getting to work or around downtown on their bikes on busy weekdays soon learn that, with traffic and road space as it is, it's to their selfish advantage to steal some sidewalk space from the pedestrians.

    They just don't give a shit if people on foot have to look out and step out of their way, and if you so much as say "Boo" to them, you're risking it. The guy in black fatigues who damn near ran me flat in a cross walk two years ago never stopped to apologize, he just sped on his way.

    Why do you defend these people, Stump? Do you regard them as your fellow cyclists?

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.