Opinion

This Was the Year of Facebook

Citizens use social media to create social change.

By Michael Geist, 18 Dec 2007, TheTyee.ca

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

If 2006 was the year of YouTube, 2007 has been Facebook's year. The growth of social media, led by Facebook, has taken the world by storm. Since January, Facebook has added 250,000 new users each day. Canadians have led the way, accounting for about 8 million of the site's nearly 60 million global users.

The hyper-growth does not tell the whole story, however. Facebook has also garnered considerable attention regarding its user privacy policies, online marketing strategies, and the short-sighted decision of some companies and governments to block employee access to the site.

While these issues have shone the spotlight on some of the challenges of social media, the lasting lesson of Facebook may come from a series of events that unfolded over the past two weeks. They demonstrate that Facebook is far more than just a cool way to catch up with old friends; rather, it is an incredibly effective and efficient tool that can be used to educate and galvanize grassroots advocacy, placing unprecedented power into the hands of individuals.

Case in point: copyright fight

There is no shortage of hyperbole associated with Facebook, social media, and the emergence of "Web 2.0," yet consider the experience of the Fair Copyright for Canada Facebook group, which I launched on December 1st with limited expectations. With the federal government expected to introduce new copyright reform within a matter of days, a Facebook group seemed like a good way to educate the public about an important issue. I sent invitations to a hundred or so Facebook friends and seeded the group with links to a few relevant websites.

What happened next was truly remarkable -- within hours, the group started to grow -- first 50 members, then 100, and then 1000 members. One week later, there were 10,000 members. Two weeks later, there were over 25,000 members with another Canadian joining the group every 30 seconds.

The big numbers tell only part of the story. The group is home to over 500 wall posts, links to 150 articles of interest, over 50 discussion threads, dozens of photos, and nine videos. Nine days ago, it helped spur on an offline protest when Kempton Lam, a Calgary technologist, organized 50 group members who descended on Industry Minister Jim Prentice's local open house to express their views on copyright.

While Facebook was not the only source of action -- there was mounting coverage from the mainstream media along with hundreds of blog postings (including three hundred questions posted for Prentice at the CBC Search Engine blog) -- the momentum was unquestionably built on thousands of Canadians who were determined to have their voices heard.

Message delivered

Much to the surprise of skeptics who paint government as unable or unwilling to listen to public concerns, those voices had an immediate impact. Ten days after the Facebook group's launch, Prentice delayed introducing the new copyright reforms, seemingly struck by the rapid formation of concerned citizens who were writing letters and raising awareness.

Not only had tools like Facebook had an immediate effect on the government's legislative agenda, but the community that developed around the group also led to a "crowdsourcing" of knowledge. Canadians from coast to coast shared information, posed questions, posted their letters to politicians, and started a national conversation on copyright law in Canada.

This scenario cannot be repeated for every issue. In this instance, Canadians increasingly recognized the detrimental effect of the proposed copyright reforms on consumer rights, privacy, and free speech, and were moved to act.

Yet for similarly placed concerns, the lesson of the past two weeks is that politicians, companies, and other organizations can ill-afford to ignore a medium that is capable of mobilizing tens of thousands within a matter of days. Those caught flatfooted may ultimately find themselves struggling to save face.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

10  Comments:

  • TTTT

    17-12-2007

    yes I'm surprised at the copyright thing

    I 'own" my name on facebook but do not use it because I fear loss of control of any work I post there and other sites like myspace.

    but I was glad to hear how facebook denizens managed to stop this hideous bill copied and pasted based upon the fantasies of american oligarchs (btw I love america).

    am I wrong to worry about posting my own work or links to my work there because it can be usurped and controlled for their own purposes (marketing etc) by the owners of these sites?

    wondering in Van...

  • Mooney

    18-12-2007

    This was the year of facebook

    Thank you for all efforts Michael.
    If you hadn't sounded the alarm we would have all been caught flat footed.

    I don't know what's more despicable giving away Canadian's digital rights, or attempting to sneak this bill through Parliment at Christmas time. The season of brotherly love.

    I think Prentice needs a course in ethics.

  • niteowl

    18-12-2007

    Loss of Control

    TTTT : you are absolutely right. Facebook owns all rights to any material you post to its site. They can relicense it, profit it from it, whatever. This is the important bit in their EULA:
    "By posting User Content to any part of the Site, you automatically grant ... to the Company, an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, publicly perform, publicly display, reformat, translate, excerpt (in whole or in part) and distribute such User Content for any purpose on or in connection with the Site or the promotion thereof."

  • no1important

    18-12-2007

    What worries me is Microsoft

    What worries me is Microsoft has their hooks into facebook and it would not surprise me in a few years if they do not own Facebook outright.

    Microsoft was all to eager to hand over info to the USG.

    The other issue with Facebook is so many things get errors so often and the ultra slow servers, even with Shaw Nitro.

  • deeby

    18-12-2007

    It's a means to an end....

    Facebook has facilitated my reestablishing contact with some old friends, and for that I'm grateful. However in each case I've moved my interactions with them off of Facebook and onto good-old-fashioned email ASAP.

    Apart from the licensing issues and their IP claims, their messaging interface is so klunky I simply can't stand to use it for anything other than one-liners.

  • Working Memory

    18-12-2007

    One solution TTTT. . .

    Purposely devalue your own intellectual property by flooding it into the market and use the attention to generate revenue through a tertiary relationship.

    This strategey undermines big companies and creates a new competitive model. Basically, it fractures the market, and that can be exactly what you want if you manage it properly.

    Follow Terry McBride's recent lead.

    McBride owns Vancouver based Netwerk Music group and manages Avril, BareNL, Sara McG, among others. They're all doing fine.

    Learn from the masters.

    The Grateful Dead developed this process in the 80's, and it worked. Now many big name artists do it through necessity.

    Adopt their strategies and model them to fit your specific use.

    Whatever you do, don't sit there out of fear and do nothing, because that is exactly what the power players want you to do.

    Large companies use complex copyright laws as intimidation to protect their revenue streams, and to keep competitors out of the market.

    Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

    Your portfolio does nothing for you or your customers if it's sitting on your desk.

    Get in the game.

    And yes, as Jerry, Elaine, George and Kramer said, buy a URL so you can be master of your domain.

  • uvicrepresent

    19-12-2007

    digital protest vs the one that takes energy

    Facebook certainly creates a whole other group of activists. Many concerned citizens would never take the time or courage to step outside and participate in protest such as a march or demonstration, but will do so on Facebook as it is as simple as joining a group.
    Is it the same though? Does it really have the same affect. It does attract greater numbers and the sheer numbers of some protest groups can appear quite powerful but are the people in these groups truly care what they're protesting or did they just accept a group invite sent by a close friend. Regardless of their motivation I suppose its still positive.

    I wonder in whose hands this marketing treasure chest will eventually end up?

  • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.