Opinion

Big Oil and Gas Pumps Money to Christy Clark

BC's premier criticized Alberta publicly while fundraising oil money there in private.

By Bill Tieleman, 9 Oct 2012, TheTyee.ca

Oil money

Oil sands tycoon hosted Christy Clark fundraiser in Calgary.

Related

"I don’t think people from Alberta really understand how much we cherish our coast, how much we cherish our environment here." -- B.C. Premier Christy Clark quoted in the Edmonton Journal.

While Premier Christy Clark was loudly proclaiming her intent to protect B.C. from the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline proposal, she was also in Calgary privately raising money from big oil sands companies for her party.

Talk about oily hypocrisy!

Clark had her hand out for the BC Liberal Party at a private dinner Oct. 1 at Calgary's Petroleum Club hosted by billionaire oilman Murray Edwards, chairman of Canadian Natural Resources Limited, owners of the Horizon Oil Sands plant.

Clark didn't want to give details, including which oil sands companies attended or how much it cost per plate when contacted by Sun News Network

"Well I had a private dinner when I was in Alberta but I will say this -- there are a lot of people in Alberta who have made big investments in British Columbia," Clark said.

"In gas, in tourism in a whole lot of other areas and in infrastructure, so just because people are in Calgary doesn't necessarily mean that they're not in the gas business and the gas business here in British Columbia is booming and it's something we really want to develop."

Clark also wants to appear to be fighting the Enbridge pipeline that would transport Alberta oil sands bitumen across northern B.C. to be shipped to Asia by tanker but at the same time is asking for big cheques from oil and gas companies to fund her party.

"The environmental issues are issues that I don't think Albertans have really thought about a lot," Clark said last week when safely back in B.C.

Given that Clark was trying to extract big money from the corporate executives attending her dinner, I somehow doubt that she also told Murray and his fellow Albertans that they are environmental pariahs who should pack up their expensive oil sands pipeline plans.

EnCana's $395,000 cash pipeline to BC Libs

But don't think that Clark doesn't have already her hand deep in the pockets of big oil and gas anyway.

EnCana Corporation alone has donated an amazing $396,000 since 2009, including contributions to Clark's leadership campaign and that of her rival George Abbott, the former education minister, according to Elections BC records.

EnCana's ex-CEO Gwyn Morgan was also a key Clark transition team member when Clark took office in 2011.

Clark's kindly Calgary host Canadian Natural Resources Limited has given the B.C. Liberal Party $61,000 since 2009, while Imperial Oil has donated more than $40,000, Chevron over $20,000, Conoco Philips over $14,000, Nexen over $12,000.

Enbridge's dicey investment in Clark

Enbridge itself has given over $40,000 to the B.C. Liberals -- but might put a stop payment order on any other donations.

If Clark was hoping that describing Alberta as a place where the environment is no big deal would improve her disastrous relationship with Premier Alison Redford, think again.

"It's absolutely not a fair statement," Redford responded Thursday. "Albertans are very proud of the fact that we have always been able to balance economic development and social and environmental sustainability."

"I believe that Albertans are very proud of... what our record has been, and I'm disappointed to hear those comments," Redford said.

But none of that likely bothered Clark's fundraising host Murray Edwards, who is also co-owner of the Calgary Flames hockey team and has been described as possibly having more at stake in the oil sands than any other individual in the world.

The CNRL board chaired by Edwards includes two former premiers, Manitoba's Gary Filmon and New Brunswick's Frank McKenna.

But perhaps the most unusual fact about Edwards is that despite being an oil patch baron, he is also well known as a federal Liberal -- as is Clark.

And Edwards likely isn't too choked about the fate of the Enbridge pipeline, as he publicly stated nearly two years ago that it faces very long odds against being built because of environmental and First Nations objections.

"For barrels to go off the west coast to China, I think that is a very, very difficult file," Murray said at a business forum in Nov. 2010. "If it's taken us decades to come to any consensus on a Mackenzie pipeline, the west coast pipeline will be just as challenging."

Perhaps that's why Clark knew that with Murray as her Petroleum Club host, she was in safe hands regardless of what she was telling the media about her opposition to Enbridge and thumbing her nose at Redford.

Oily hypocrisy

It may also be why Clark sang Edwards' praises in her speech to the School of Public Policy at the University of Calgary when she spoke there last week.

"So I'll give you one example. Murray Edwards, who is a great Calgarian, owns 45 per cent of the Red Chris mine. It's in the northwest of British Columbia. It's one of the top mining deposits anywhere in the world," Clark told students.

"When I became premier, I said I wanted people all around the world to know that you can do business successfully in British Columbia. You can work your way through the public policy issues, the First Nations issues and that you can make a profit if you come to our province."

"So we've been working really hard to take the Red Chris mine, which has been an idea for longer than it's been a fact, and help it get to fruition because resource development is what powers our province too. It's what puts people to work, and it's what funds health care and education and all the things that we care about."

"A significant part of our progress in British Columbia comes from people like Murray Edwards, it comes from investors and people who are located right here in Calgary."

"So I want to say, as I said to Murray, thank you for that because many of the companies that are invested in the oil sands are also invested in gas and mining in our province -- companies like Shell, Apache, Nexen and Trans Canada.

"And, of course, EnCana, which I just talked about, that has emerged as one of the most important investors in our province, an early believer in what we could do with natural gas," Clark said.

In other words, Clark told them: don't listen to what I tell the public, listen to what I tell you -- and I say write my party a very, very large cheque!

After all, it's money and not oil that greases the political wheel.

'Most desperate politician in Canada'

But it's no wonder that Calgary Herald columnist Don Braid was astonished by Clark's behavior last week during her visit to Alberta, including the premier describing the benefits of the $5 billion Enbridge pipeline as "chump change" compared to B.C.'s plans for liquefied natural gas.

"She is, by a wide measure, the most inconsistent, self-contradictory and desperate politician in Canada," Braid wrote, also describing her as a "peculiar unelected premier, who can seem perfectly normal for about five minutes."

And that's after just a two days of trying to follow Christy Clark's twisted logic. Imagine how British Columbians will feel next spring after two years of it.  [Tyee]

34  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • freebear

    36 weeks ago

    What is it like to bend over backwards?

    Ask Christy she knows; all the gyrations to seem to be doing something while accepting money from the 'bad guys' at the same time!

  • happy (not verified)

    36 weeks ago

    BCGEU pension plan stock holdings

    Monetary value in brackets:

    CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES 9,878,124.00 (473,557,264.56)

    ENCANA CORP 6,723,321.00 (225,432,953.13)

    ENBRIDGE INC 4,698,492.00 (279,184,394.64)

    http://www.bcimc.com/publications/pdf/Inventory/Inventory20110331.pdf

  • Bob Wiley

    36 weeks ago

    All Pension Plan Stock Holdings

    Thanks happy for bringing up a very important point, pension plan stock holdings. All public and private pension plans including RRSPs etc. support the fraudulent 'investment' fiasco called capitalism. Bringing up this topic of where their pension checks come from with supposedly environmentalist folks in my age range usually is near the beginning of an argument and often near the end of a friendship. Being an intellectually dishonest SUV driving, mall shopping environmentalist is common, being an anti-materialist dropout who refuses to participate isn't.

  • Skywalker

    36 weeks ago

    But pension plan holdings don't influence gov't decisions.

    So what is the point of dragging that into this discussion? Is there a conflict of interest or a perceived conflict? Of course not. But when an industry sector donates to a political party the expectation is for a quid pro quo.

    The good thing is that Christy never knows when to keep her mouth shut. The quotations are damning and should appear in election ads.

  • bcguy

    36 weeks ago

    I hate to use the word LYER

    I hate to use the word LYER for Christy's two faced position on pipe lines and such so will try just calling her a fibber. THe election can't come soon enough for us getting rid of the woman

  • happy (not verified)

    36 weeks ago

    Skywalker

    It was in context of the article, nothing more. I made no comment. Just setting out whats on the public record. If it makes certain groups uncomfortable, thats not my problem.

    bcguy: try LIAR instead

  • worried

    36 weeks ago

    christy fund raising

    Is this why she cancelled the Fall sitting of Parliament? To go fundraising in Alberta? Disgusting.

  • Skywalker

    36 weeks ago

    Uncomfortable?

    You have rather odd definition of "in context". I'd class it as "irrelevant" in any context about Christy getting donations fro oil companies.

  • happy (not verified)

    36 weeks ago

    Skywalker

    The oil companies identified by Tieleman in the article are owned - in part - by the BCGEU (and all other BC public workers too for that matter, don't want to be accused of singling out the BCGEU)
    Therefore it could even be said that they themselves donated a portion of these funds to the liberal party, in an offhand way I admit, but as they say if you "follow the money" you will end up back at the shareholders won't you. BCIMC is a BIG shareholder. Not so black and white is it.

    Definitely in context.

  • Skywalker

    36 weeks ago

    So if I buy...

    ...something from the oil company which contributes to Christy Clark and the BC Liberals that is also related. Pension Funds are invested to get a return the individual BCGEU Member probably does not keep track. But this justifies Christy taking doantions for her election campaign from the oil companies. She doesn't have to risk an investment. She just has to wink as she accepts it.

    In context. Sure!

  • happy (not verified)

    36 weeks ago

    Skywalker

    "She doesn't have to risk an investment"

    Nor do government workers. A Defined Benefit pension payout is gauranteed by the province and indexed for inflation.
    There is no risk whatsoever to the Plan members. Zero.

  • Frank

    36 weeks ago

    Oh brother

    And you of course don't have a problem with supporting the government of China via your purchases and political leanings?

    Or supporting the government of Iran?

  • happy (not verified)

    36 weeks ago

    There goes Frank again!

    Completely sideways. Well Frank, hate to break it to you but the computer your looking at right now was probably manufactured in China so does that make you a supporter of the Chinese government?
    The Canadian government broke diplomatic relations with Iran so.....I guess not.

  • Skywalker

    36 weeks ago

    Good one Frank...

    ..and it is "in context" as well.

  • Frank

    36 weeks ago

    happy

    And of course your computer wasn't manufactured in China. No doubt according to you it was built in Sechelt, each chip loving placed into position by local natives.

    As for Iran, the Harper government opposes shipping Alberta bitumen east. Which means eastern Canada has to rely on OPEC oil, such as from Venezuela. And of course that helps other OPEC nations such as Iran.

    Hypocrisy is a bitch when it bites you in the ass isn't it?

  • Frank

    36 weeks ago

    A trip down happy's "logic" lane

    How about the bridge you drive over has a toll. A toll paid for by everyone including people who bought German cars. Built by German companies that financially backed Hitler. Ergo, your bridge is being partially financed by people that support companies that financed the war against Canadian soldiers in WW2.

    Why do you hate Canada so much?

    ps. my car was built in Michigan and Ontario with some parts made by only the happiest and most unexploited workers in Mexico. The energy used came from a special pixie dust found only in a place that you can get to by going to the second star on the right, straight onto morning. And of course myself and all the workers send Christmas cards to each other every year. But then my car is only used to carry sick neighbour children to hospital.

  • happy (not verified)

    36 weeks ago

    Frank

    No, my Salish buddies work in the gravel mine actually.
    I don't care where my computers made.

    I don't care if you call me a hypocrite, just puts me in the same class as those who rant against oil corporations while collecting pension funds from those same corpoations at the same time. I'm in pretty good company huh!!

    I'm logging out now, I'll be gone for a while so won't be responding any further to this, just letting ya know I haven't run away.
    And when I do come back......you do owe me a bit of an apology. I retracted what I said about federal NDP election financing back in July when I got a newspaper article mixed up with the cons and you called me on it.
    But as we both know now.....the NDP WAS guilty and had to return over 344,000 smackers of illegal contributions. Will you retract?

    Cheers!

  • Cool Hand

    36 weeks ago

    Talk About NDP Hypocrisy!

    Quote:
    Tieleman - Clark had her hand out for the BC Liberal Party at a private dinner Oct. 1 at Calgary's Petroleum Club hosted by billionaire oilman Murray Edwards, chairman of Canadian Natural Resources Limited, owners of the Horizon Oil Sands plant.

    Yet, just over 10 days earlier earlier on September 19, 2012, NDP leader Adrian Dix and NDP party prez Moe Sihota hosted the same private dinner for the same people and same companies!

    Including Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.!

    As well as Encana, Suncor, etc.

    At the swanky La Terrazza restaurant in Vancouver's Yaletown!

    At $3,000/plate for one and $5,000 plate for two!

    Talk about NDP hypocrisy!

    And what did this huge chunk of oils sands money/natural gas money get in return from the BC NDP?

    Quote:
    Those in attendance were also pleasantly reassured to hear that Dix fully supports the Liberal government’s plans to expand the LNG industry for export, and would not call for a moratorium on fracking. He also understands the need to use natural gas to generate electricity.

    http://www.allpolitics.ca/index.php?src=news&srctype=detail&category=NDP&refno=84

    So what does the NDP base think about this hypocrisy?

    It's now apparent that BC enviro-minded voters have no alternative but to vote for the BC Green Party.

  • Skywalker

    36 weeks ago

    From Adrian Dix ( look it up)

    Written by Adrian Dix Thursday, 14 April 2011

    "I am committed to scrapping the BC Liberal support for offshore oil and gas exploration, for the oil tankers and for the Enbridge pipeline. We must stop undertaking these projects just so the tar sands can be expanded at an exponential rate of growth. British Columbians never signed our province up for that role and we should not accept it.

    I was also the first leadership candidate to commit to expanded public scrutiny with specific steps for upstream oil and gas operations in BC. I have committed to reviews of fracking, sour gas emissions and upstream greenhouse gas emissions in order to get public accountability and to identify concrete pollution reduction solutions. Doing nothing and relying on the Liberals' policies of self-regulation in the gas fields are not satisfactory to me, any more than the IPP free-for-all has been. Putting politics aside, BC needs a change in government to save our environment and I believe I can provide the leadership to help make the NDP government again, and start the process of change."

    So stating that he is committed to a review of fracking means he is in favour? Cool Hand must be taking lessons on truthiness from Mitt Romney.

  • Cool Hand

    36 weeks ago

    Skywalker

    Quote:
    So stating that he is committed to a review of fracking means he is in favour?

    NDP MLA John Horgan's (who Dix will appoint NDP energy minister IF the NDP ever form guvmint) relatively recent response to fraccing:

    Quote:
    [Horgan is] impressed with the B.C. industry's experience and expertise. "We've been fracking in B.C. for decades and we do it fairly well. I've been to a number of frack sites, and I'm comfortable with the technology."

    http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Horgan+deems+greener+future/6780093/story.html

    And Rafe Mair from last month:

    Quote:
    BC NDP Must Come Clean on its Full Energy Policy. The NDP are getting a free ride - at least they certainly are on the energy file.

    Quote:
    John Horgan, the NDP Energy Critic, seems to favour, without reservations, the obtaining of natural gas through the process now called “fracking”

    http://thecanadian.org/item/1701-bc-ndp-must-come-clean-on-its-full-energy-policy-fracking-lg-site-c-kinder-morgan-rafe-mair

    So, we have the NDP having:

    1. A large private dinner with the Calgary energy barrons at $3,000/plate;

    2. NDP MLA and energy critic Horgan is very comforatable with fraccing;

    3. Rafe Mair acknowledging that the NDP energy critic favours, withour reservations, fraccing;

    Will the REAL NDP please stand up?

  • Frank

    36 weeks ago

    Luke

    You're quoting Rafe?

    I wonder if Luke has ever bought a mutual fund that invests in "ethical" investments.

    Now THAT would be hypocritical.

    We know he has an accoutn at Van City which seems pretty hypocritical.

    And he says he supports SOME land being in the ALR, which also seems hypocritical.

  • Frank

    36 weeks ago

    Will the real Liberals stand up?

    You know, the ones that take a stand on anything? How about something simple like the Enbridge pipeline across northern BC? Onside or opposed?

    Guess that's too much to ask.

  • mission impossible

    36 weeks ago

    Horgan

    John Horgan stated to me...

    "We can`t be against everything"

    With First Nations onboard,..

    Horgan also said..When something goes wrong with natural gas it goes boom, there isn`t a clean up disaster.

    Unfortunately with LNG, the province is getting zippo for land leases, that $billion annual easter egg is gone..

    And, LNG will turn out to be a bust, the LNG frackers are now claiming that unless they get free hydro electric power building LNG freezers is not feasible..

    There are so many countries chasing China and big dollars for LNG, China has countries tripping over each other, LNG for export will not come to fruition, at least not for 5 plants, maybe 1, and even that one can`t get any long-term gas buying contracts..

    Once the truth comes out about LNG, the welfare industry, it will be easier for the NDP to back off..

    Unfortunately there was so much misinformation(BC Liberal spin doctors and complicit media) about the potential for big LNG dollars, numbers thrown around, big numbers using the word.

    $trillion

    The truth is here, written a year before the economic spin doctors, better late then never.

    http://powellriverpersuader.blogspot.ca/2012/02/chinese-tigers-playing-with-canadian.html

  • Mikemah

    36 weeks ago

    Clark

    Still need a reason to dump the Lieberals

  • MEW

    36 weeks ago

    Government Pension

    plans are not just for BCGEU members. Cops, firefighters, paramedics, hospital workers etc etc all contribute to the public plans. The workers have joint boards but do not control any of the government pension plans. Here is a link so people will understand that public pension plans are not BCGEU controlled.

    http://www.pensionsbc.ca/portal/page/portal/pen_corp_home/pc_home_page/

  • Skywalker

    36 weeks ago

    Cool Hand aka MitT Romney

    Here's what John Horgan said on fracking.

    http://www.johnhorgan.ca/news/news-releases/opposition-proposes-stronger-actions-sustainability-environmental-protection-frac

    On the truthiness Scale your interpretation doesn't get a very high reading. It is hardly an endorsement of the existing regulations and approval process. But hey logical deductions was never your forte.

  • cfvua

    35 weeks ago

    Natural gas subsidies and donations

    The co-efficient of liberal "royalty credit" programs is in direct relation to donations to their party. The donations to the liberals by gas producers were done with funds credited back to producers from royalties that should belong to taxpayers. No additional jobs were created by these programs or we would be counting income tax revenues on the plus side rather than deficit side. Any additional income taxes generated go right back to Alberta with the people that earn the wages. Donations to liberals=subsidies. Simple Campbell/Neufeld/Clark/Morgan/BCliberal math. Any new government after May should be campaigning on eliminating subsidies as they have been proven not to work. Unless you count political donations.

  • aDriftwood

    35 weeks ago

    There is only one reason

    that Clark has suddenly gone enviro friendly. She wants to win the 2013 so she has four years to stuff Northern Gateway and everything else down our throats. She is a disciple of the master liar and manipulator Gordon Campell. Her problem and the problem of the BC Liberal party is her personal ambition. They need to clean house in order to stand a chance of being re-eledted, but they don't have anybody to clean house with. This is their last term in government. Not even the Liberal party hacks who appear so regularly here on the tyee can save them.

  • sailorken

    35 weeks ago

    lng exports

    we are being played by CHINA on this LNG export proposal.

    right now there is a $12 disparity in natural gas pricing between north america and asia.
    the LNG projects are being "sold" to us on that basis.
    this is soft logic at best.
    australia,indonesia,and the USA are going nuts to supply Asia(primarily CHINA & JAPAN)with LNG,this will cause an oversupply and force prices down.
    far better to encourage the development of GTL plants instead.
    GTL is a thermal process the converts natural gas into:diesel fuel,jet fuel and kerosene.

    the by product is heat.
    GTL plants use the waste heat to generate electricity for their operation,surplus is sold to(in our case)BC Hydro.
    for more info look up:
    SHELL,GTL,QATAR

    win,win.

  • Cool Hand

    35 weeks ago

    cfvua

    Quote:
    The co-efficient of liberal "royalty credit" programs is in direct relation to donations to their party. The donations to the liberals by gas producers were done with funds credited back to producers from royalties that should belong to taxpayers.

    Cute comeback. But... ummmm... how do ya explain the 1990's NDP major increases to these same tax credits to benefit the same international energy concerns? I'm all ears!

    Quote:
    The New Democrats engaged in a courtship with the oil and gas industry back in 1998 when they announced some major incentives for development and exploration.

    Quote:
    [The NDP's Dan Miller] offered reductions in royalty rates of up to 40 per cent, aimed at encouraging the industry to drill new wells.

    Quote:
    Subsidies? Giveaways to big business? Not at all, explained Dan Miller, then energy minister. "Incentives."

    Quote:
    The discounted royalty rates would act as a spur to development. Additional production would boost provincial revenues by more than the cost of the incentives, Miller predicted.

    Quote:
    Spot on. The provincial take from natural gas royalties has increased 10-fold since the New Democratic Party government cut the rate to encourage development.

    http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/columnists/story.html?id=0b79f09f-2ad9-4254-be9b-7312a13e2560&p=2

    So any potential NDP guvmint is gonna eliminate the same tax credits to the energy industry that the NDP introduced in the 1990's? Gonna be fun to hear your response thereto!!

  • Cool Hand

    35 weeks ago

    sailorken

    Quote:
    far better to encourage the development of GTL plants instead.

    Ya know. I fully concur!!! And in that vein, South Africa's SASOL, a world leader in GTL (gas to liquids technology) purchased a $2 BILLION interest in Talisman's NE BC interest in the Montney basin.

    And SASOL intends to build a massive $9 BILLION+ facility to convert these natural gas assets into diesel (a more environmentally-friendly diesel, I might add).

    And that GTL plant would require a few thousand construction workers over several years and at least 500 permanent high-paying union jobs.

    Build it in neighbouring Dawson Creek, BC, correct?

    NOPE. With the potential of an NDP guvmint and higher corporate and capital taxes, SASOL has now decided to build the plant in Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta!!!!!

    Using NE BC's natural gas!

    Fu## the looney left BC NDP. This major investment decision is just the beginning of future capital investments that should be made in BC but will be made in Alberta if the BC NDP is ever elected.

    And 1 1/2 years thereafter of a hypothetical NDP guvmint, we will see its collpase based upon previous history.

    BC's looney left holds BC back economically all the time. Pathetic actually.

  • John M.

    35 weeks ago

    B.C. hypocrites

    Clark can bash Alberta all she wants to. But the bottom line is, she is nothing but an oil company prostitute. Just like Dix of the NDP in B.C., he did the same thing. All these politicians are the same. They cry environment this and that on the one hand calling Alberta every name in the book using us as an excuse to deflect their own pollution and filth while they pocket the money of those they claim to despise.

  • John M.

    35 weeks ago

    B.C. hypocrites

    So the builders of the dam on the Peace River need to cut a cheque to the Government of Alberta. That is real pollution, not make believe, maybe, some day pollution. B.C. Is flooding a massive, beautiful valley ecosystem in the Peace Country for Hydroelectric generation.The site C dam will be the third along the Peace River, and will destroy some of the best agricultural land in B.C., along with its diverse ecosystem and wildlife habitat. But who cares about moose when you live in the coast. Real pollution and real ecosystem destruction escapes B.C. With this make believe, maybe, some day Kitmat pipeline pollution. B.C. needs hydro electricity to power it's Dawson Creek shale gas pipeline's. Have a nice day !

  • Marysue52

    35 weeks ago

    TAR Sands! Have the courage to call it so~!

    Even Bill has capitulated to ESSO's CEO framing. It's TAR Sands, not a euphemistic Oil Sands. If they tell a lie long enough you'll believe it or what? Geez! Have the guts to call it what it was before they "framed" it.