Why we can't depend on our provincial leaders to protect our interests.

-
Alberta's greed is a threat to Canada and the world.
-
Why halting Canada's march towards tar sands petro-state must be our first priority.
-
As opposition mounts to Northern Gateway, backers will promise big bucks for BC.
Canada, but especially British Columbia, is headed towards a very nasty showdown and nobody in charge wants to address the reasons.
Things have changed -- a lot according to Jeff Rubin and his book The End of Growth (reviewed today on The Tyee by Crawford Kilian). For several years my thoughts have matched that book's title. The difference between Rubin and me is that I've gone mostly by the feeling in my tummy while Rubin has used scholarship, the analysis of an expert (himself), research and an ability to lay it clearly before us that "growth" must stop if we're going to keep this planet going both economically and physically. The book is a must read.
Canada is in the midst of an environmental war and governments haven't noticed it, or they have noticed it and are deliberately ignoring it -- or as I posit later, they say we cannot control events so let's get on with it.
I have never seen anything like it. For many years I've seen environmentalists ignored and pilloried and it's remarkable how well they did under the governments that existed -- new rules on clear-cuts comes to mind. But now the assault on the environment is now so broad and so dangerous that the environment movement doesn't have the numbers or the money to carry the battle themselves. Knowing this, the public is pitching in magnificently.
In a nutshell. Consider destruction of our farmland by road building, fish farms, mining, private river power destruction of our rivers and pipelines to which is added devastating and certain damage from tanker traffic on our pristine coast and in Vancouver harbour and beyond. Coming out of this is a positive change -- the public is coming on side. Public environment hearings attract people in growing numbers who, a few years ago, wouldn't have been seen dead at this sort of rally. At a "roast" for me last November I looked around the room and said, "There are people here tonight that a year ago would rather be caught in a house of ill repute than in this room."
Part of this comes from the obvious harm associated with all the issue above. More and more can see with their own eyes the consequences of corporate evil aided and abetted by governments.
Major environmentally destructive catastrophes such as the Shell/Gulf of Mexico blow-out are major stories for the international TV networks. This has raised concerns for environment issues close to home such that people no longer believe kindly old corporations and their public barnyard droppings. To say that corporate PR ain't believed any more is a massive understatement. Just this weekend, the pipeline leak pouring contaminants into the Red Deer River in Alberta was explained away as an "exception" by that province's premier.
Why isn't BC's government listening?
In B.C., the First Nations have become an environmental force to be reckoned with, especially those on the coast who see their way of life threatened. A short time ago I shared a platform with Art Sterritt, executive director for Coastal First Nations, who gave the most clear-eyed statement of the First Nations message I've every heard. During his dissertation he stated something I simply had never heard of.
I paraphrase Sterritt, "Of course we have 80 per cent unemployment but no one goes hungry because we live off our natural resources as we have been doing for thousands of years... take away those resources and our inherited way of life and the way we support ourselves is finished."
The Internet hums with evidence of these social, environmental and economic changes. Of keen interest, however, is the silence from the Campbell/Clark government and its handmaidens, the traditional media. It's noteworthy how the op-ed pages of major Vancouver papers are open, come one, come all, any time, for the corporate polluters. It's truly an amazing coincidence that once the polluter gets into a public dust-up, a flack-provided piece by industry graces the op-ed page.
Why isn't the Campbell/Clark government listening?
Because philosophically they don't want to. They are Fraser Institute clones who believe that capitalism and its famed "hidden hand," the market, must never be interfered with. They believe, to a person, that land must be developed without interference from limp-wristed environmentalists. To them we must grow and grow every minute of the day. What they don't and won't understand is that either we curb our demands for more and more, or Mother Nature will do it for us. The purist capitalist knows no restraint and instinctively cuts down the last tree and catches the last fish.
Premier Clark and her toadies have another reason for silence. The Harper government supports these environmental travesties (with more to come) and Premier Clark badly needs Harper's help over the Campbell/Clark HST bungle -- and they need it before the 2013 election. Thus the order of the day is to suck up to the Prime Minister at all times. This is the first time in my recollection that a B.C. government has bungled into the clutches of Ottawa, something past B.C. governments of whatever stripe never allowed to happen.
Here is the real crunch. The decision regarding pipelines and tankers rests in Beijing which has hundreds of millions of dollars sunk into the tar sands bitumen going into tankers from Kitimat and Vancouver. The Chinese don't give a fiddler's fart that this tar sands gunk will cause huge environmental damage to our lands and coasts. They're not big on these concerns in China so why would they care about us?
In making their decision to invest, unquestionably China received the clear understanding from the governments that the bitumen export would not be delayed for environmental reasons. China does not invest without doing its due diligence. That's the sorry pass this issue has reached. If the governments do have a Damascus-like conversion to protecting our land, China will retaliate -- big time.
Short end of the pipe
That there will be spills, leaks and ruptures spewing this heavy toxic gunk onto our lands, into our rivers and onto our coasts is a mathematical certainty and our task is to fight with all our might for our province. We have been played for fools by two of the worst governments in our history supported by B.C. MLAs and MPs that haven't the guts to emit even a peep of concern on environmental travesties bound to destroy their incredibility beautiful province. They should all hang their heads in shame.
Thanks to the unquenchable greed of Alberta and the screw-the-environment attitude of our right wing zealots in Ottawa and Victoria, British Columbia is slated to become Alberta's ever-leaking sewer pipe.
I don't believe that British Columbians will permit this to happen and the governments will be dealing with very heavy duty public action -- for which the blame lies 100 per cent on them. ![[Tyee]](http://thetyee.cachefly.net/ui/img/ico_fishie.png)
Rafe Mair writes a column for The Tyee every second Monday. Read his previous columns here. He is also a founding contributor to The Common Sense Canadian.
29
Login or register to post comments
MkumbaJoe
1 year ago
plus NDP....
Plus the NDP are a party of whiners and crybabies over what's going/gone wrong, rather than a party of the proactive.
One solution only, hit the streets!
alive
1 year ago
MkumbaJoe
So, when was the last time the NDP was in power? did they have a majority?
If you do not vote for them, they have no means to do the changes you would like.
By the time that the NDP, perhaps do get to form a govenment with some authority,it will be far too late to save the environment, because we are already prevented by past laws to bust out of various agreements made.
Hit the streets, you say? sure our lotus-eater population will be so busy with the latest toy, to even notice .
We are brainwashed to believe that our lives are blessed because industry keeps delivering new gadgets!
Fiat lux
1 year ago
Nothing can, or will be
Nothing can, or will be changed under the present deregulated, imaginary money creation by private banks, licencing destruction and enslavement.
We need money, under strict public control, to represent realities for trading purposes, but not the present racket of destructive, dictatorial powers by imaginary figures, to maintain the enforcing powers of a theory for the benefit of an aristocracy.
Ed Deak.
jimmmmy
1 year ago
long winding Road
Enjoyable read but a little compressed, maybe on purpose . I put the start of BCs environmental disasters and take over by, US at the time , foreign interests near the end of WACs 2nd term. Every government since has been complicit in the distruction of our paradise here in BC.
Hakuin
1 year ago
First violence
will come from the oil companies. Just as pipeline "bombings" that inexplicably have no authors just happen to result in immediate enlargement of the previous pipe as "coincidental benefit" when repairs are effected, so also will convenient events occur in B.C. Just watch as they manufacture consent for repression and unbridled rapacity.
Van Isle
1 year ago
'Agent provoctuers' will be
'Agent provoctuers' will be in the mix too just to egg people on.
Cynic
1 year ago
"The book is a must
"The book is a must read."
Sorry, Rafe. If it doesn't expose the banking system as the root cause of our predicament, it's a waste of time.
A Voice
1 year ago
Excellent read
And too true. I am feeling disgusted by some of the above comments, they are some of the reasons why the the apathetic attitudes prevail in this province" nothing can be changed..." if you got out from behind your keyboard, maybe it would.
When the push back for the environment starts to happen, I will be there..pushing hard for our rivers, oceans and land. This insanity does have to stop, and its very obvious it will bave to be the people, not our govt that will do the work, our leadership (if you can call it that) is to busy collecting corporate donations, and keytowing to the federal govt
jimmmmy
1 year ago
A Voice
You are late to this game . Emma Goldmann said many decades ago , that "if voting changed things elections would be illegal" Never has that been truer in Canada. I regularly here the Apathetic Voter argument in the coffee shop. It's both elitist and a cop out . What your advocating requires the spilling of blood , not something to speak of lightly. The governments we now have are result of the will of the people , since the the end of WW2 anyway.
Mogs
1 year ago
Privatization
I went south for a few years before Ralph 'let's privatize every government service" Klien stopped being a channel 4 weatherman and became premier of Alberta.
I was shocked when I came back and looked at a forestry map of crown land in Alberta to see that it had the names of corporations all over it, in place of a named forest used to be. Where I live here in BC if I go into supposed crown land I see signs everywhere stating that the land is private property and no trespassing is aloud. Recently armed thugs from the BC government have been kicking campers off of supposed crown forest lands.
Canada has already been sold off to the highest bidders and none of that money goes to Canadians that are not already filthy rich. We are all serfs now and the BC Lib Gov along with the Fed Cons are just flexing their muscles for these multinational who own the mineral right's to Canada called leases and permits.
Quit your whining and get used to being a modern day slave, either that or go out and make a change for the better. Quit working for the multinationals and quit buying their trash that destroys our habitat.
End of story all you whiners are to blame for supporting them in your buying frenzies.
questing
1 year ago
Representative Democracy and Debt
These are the two things that are the problem with caring for the environment.
It is now glaringly obvious that representative democracy represents corporations, banks, and those with money and influence. The only way for the people to have a voice is to change the system of government to direct democracy with strict laws to enforce the new system.
The debt, which is raging out of control even while interest rates are low, will control any political party regardless of the policies offered up during an election campaign.
The notion that the NDP will save the environment is a pipe dream at best. The big push from the NDP will be the promise of jobs, jobs, jobs, and better educational and medical services. These things all cost huge dollars. With the existing government debt, they cannot possibly interfere with industry. So don't expect help from the NDP, or any other party not willing to seriously change how it spends the tax dollars it collects.
The next election had better be about money!
KD Brown
1 year ago
Good one Rafe
Cozy up to Ottawa indeed...
The recent spill into the Red Deer River has a Premier stating that 100,000 people who depend on this section of the river for their drinking water should be grateful because in Alberta this doesn't happen more often.
Cold comfort.
Who will pay for the provision of drinking water from alternate sources? Or are we to believe that industrial oil in our water is good for us?
Where is the map that shows the landscape and watersheds that are affected by recent spills, pollution and waste from the oil industry?
Where is the research on the effects of chemicals released into the environment - into the air and water - from the tar sands? How are we supposed to judge whether or not the development as currently practiced even breaks even, once the environmental costs are calculated?
Oh, right. The Environmental Lakes Program, currently doing research on the ecological effects of tar sands released chemicals is being shut down. As is the high arctic atmospheric monitoring station, which was tracking pollutants and thinning ozone over Canada. Not even $6 million a year to keep these two world class programs running.
And break Canada's commitments under the Montreal Protocol, the treaty on ozone monitoring and reduction, by shutting down the arctic atmosphere program, just for good measure.
And a new $50 million for tar sands environmental "monitoring."
Maybe we should hire an economist for Prime Minister...
Oh, right...
snert
1 year ago
Numbers please
"That there will be spills, leaks and ruptures spewing this heavy toxic gunk onto our lands, into our rivers and onto our coasts is a mathematical certainty and our task is to fight with all our might for our province."
Wilf Smith
1 year ago
Raif Mair
I never thought I'd say this but I love Raif Mair. At last someone who tells it like it really is!
lowball
1 year ago
Northern pipeline
I'm going to stick my neck out and think outside the box. I'm following Raif's methodology to go with my guts rather than scholarship. I firmly believe the Enbridge pipeline is a smokescreen. Both levels of government have got us so focused on this ugly piece of industrial planning, that we may be missing the real objective. Governments and the oil people are not stupid. They know full well they have one hell of a battle on their hands to build this line. And they also know it will be stalled for years in litigation and protest. So what is REALLY happening?
Maybe look for the possibility of paralleling an existing line to by-pass any environmental study. TCP has now got a contract to build and operate a gas pipeline to Kitimat. Is it possible that a new type of gas pipeline can be converted to take the tar sands bitumen? If so, we could be snookered into believing it is for natural gas.
Maybe I'm paranoid, but somehow I can't believe our federal government wouldn't make such an astounding commitment to China without an ace up their sleeve.
Due diligence, people.
Skywalker
1 year ago
Good comment Rafe and others but...
I have a real problem with comments like, Questing's "The notion that the NDP will save the environment is a pipe dream at best." There has never been a CCF or NDP federal government and the federal governments sets all the major rules under which a a provincial government must play. Cut a free trade deal to move capital at will and the corporations gains the upper hand with the ability to launch a capital strike.
In B.C. we have had 13 years in total of NDP government with the other 100 plus under investor-friendly or pro business governments. (Read Governments for and by the corporations)
The growth at all costs mentality has been with us for a very long time and now that resources are dwindling and understood to be finite we suddenly realize that growth by selling off the kids futures is really dumb. Would a few more NDP governments have done better? Well if Brian Mulroney hadn't been elected, things might well have been different. Yes we would not have had the FTA. If Harper had not received his majority the environment would certainly not have been at risk as it is now. Hell that would have been the case if the Liberals had replaced Harper.
anthonyshrubb
1 year ago
What?
They treat their own province like a cesspool,why do you think you're just going to be a leaky sewer pipe?
oldcrank
1 year ago
Growth, but who benefits?
The pipeline will add to Canada's GDP, but what exactly will be the contribution? Virtually nothing in BC. Even in Alberta few jobs will exist 10 years from now when the building is all done and they are merely mining the bitumen. With the royalty scheme in place, little will go to the province. Most will go to shareholders - 70% who live outside Canada. We take all the risk, they get most of the money.
With the increased production over the years, the $ CDN will stay high, making most other businesses uncompetitive. The rest of the economy will stagnate. Aside from the danger, which is mostly in BC since that is where all the difficult terrain is and the dangerous tanker routes, other costs are too high to go all out on tar sands exploitation. Perhaps continue at the current pace? Expand as fast as the multinationals want - no way.
We are fortunate that the combination of activism - Occupy, Quebec students - and Harper environmentalism occurred at the same time. If we can persuade many of our fellow citizens to take up their pans and wooden spoons and stand against those who would put our land and water in peril of long term contamination, we can slow and perhaps even reverse the Harper environmental mindset.
Lets hope that the NDP, when it wins the next election, keeps it commitment to the environment even when it costs a few union jobs. That is, lets hope they govern as if they were elected by all the people, not just union members.
That is, lets hope they are not Clark NDPers. That Dix has learned something since he was 2IC to Clark.
retsof
1 year ago
oil & gas
I enjoyed the column, especially the part about your birthday party attendees. I never thought I'd agree with you on anything but am now a devoted reader. That you would devote yourself to the enviornment in your latter yrs is commendable.
The B.C. government is listening. They just don't care. Its their way or no way. Some people just don't want to believe the earth can come to an end as we know it because it is so polluted.
Most of these people have not studied history. You only need to read about civilizations which florished & then disappeared because of a lack of water.
Air & water are 2 things esential to life. We can live without the oil & gas but not clean drinking water.
I do wonder why Stevie slime is so adament about dancing to China's tune? What is it they have on him that he would care more about them than his Canada? The agreements he signed with China makes Canada responsible for any damage to the Chinese assets in Canada. A most peculair agreement. Under usual circumstances I'd say, gee this is Canada, nothing goes really wrong here. Or does Steve slime & China expect such massive revolt about the distruction of the enviornment that China wants to ensure the Canadian government pays them for their losses or the government sends in troops to repress its own citizens.
RickW
1 year ago
KD Brown
Oil Spills In Alberta: 1970 - 2012
http://www.seankheraj.com/?p=1050
http://www.seankheraj.com/?p=1257
Hakuin
1 year ago
think of it as a pageant
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/06/06/alberta-counter-terror-unit-set-up-to-protect-the-oil-sands-by-federal-tories/
zalm
1 year ago
Numbers please "That there
Numbers please
"That there will be spills, leaks and ruptures spewing this heavy toxic gunk onto our lands, into our rivers and onto our coasts is a mathematical certainty..."
Oh, now you want numbers, eh? Well, here's the costs associated with just one tanker spill in BC waters.
http://www.frankejames.com/pdf/WhoPaysfactsheet.pdf
Unfortunately, you'll notice that it's not the pipeline operator, the "owner" of the oil or even the owners of the ship that pays. Their liability is limited to the value of the ship and cargo, at least until you get to Tier 4, and then it's only a "faint hope clause" seeing as most tankers are registered in such impecunious and corruption-ridden jurisdictions as Liberia that are completely absent legal, property or tax treaties with respectable nations.
Why don't you try asking a "smart" question, sometime? This whole effort is a disaster for everyone but the shareholders of the oil companies and you're not only disingenuous, but bald-faced ignorant to pretend otherwise.
Noah_Scape
1 year ago
The Leak Last Week
The leak last week, just 20 miles from where I was born, was a pipeline across the Red Deer River that was not run below the river, it just lays across the bottom of it. There are 100s of pipeline crossings of rivers like that in Alberta.
If they care so little about their own rivers, imagine the risks they will take with B.C.'s rivers.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
Of course, we have to
Of course, we have to consider the "wealth" those pipelines and the disasters they cause "create" !
Most important ! Enough to make the hearts of all good "economists" and "conservatives" jump with joy, as it all jacks up the GDP and "growth" figures.
Ed Deak.
Conductor274
1 year ago
Burrard Inlet
If anyone believes nothing can or should be done about Harper's plans to destroy the environment then read this. Super tankers carrying 2 million barrels of oil will run out of Burrard Inlet and one spill could ruin Vancouver for the foreseeable futre. Harper and Christy Clark know these risks and are willing to do this anyway.
http://thecanadian.org/item/1479-cost-of-oil-spill-burrard-inlet-$40-billion-kinder-morgan-rex-weyler
RickW
1 year ago
Heard on the news today.....
.....the truth behind Canada's imports and exports of oil. Apparently, we IMPORT oil at premium pricing, while we EXPORT oil at discount pricing. As we import about 50% of the oil we use, we run at a LOSS of some $19 billion a year.
Now for that price, you'd think we could build a pipeline to service the parts of the country that rely on imports, wouldn't ya? But then, I'm no "expert" (except maybe when I hear bafflegab....).
igbymac
1 year ago
Keep participating in the fraudulent system of governance
by voting for any Party, and you help ensure nothing will change.
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/06/lesser-of-two-evils-con-game.html
igbymac
1 year ago
As for the spills and leaks ...
my gawd! how many are occurring that we never hear about? I suspect at least a magnitude larger than those we are aware of considering the risk involved to the perpetrating corporation in being exposed.
Luck
1 year ago
AND THATS WITHOUT A PIPE LINE .......................
THE CAPTION SUMS IT UP NICELY,
THESE POLITICIANS DO NOT HAVE A CLUE WHAT THEY ARE DOING,
NO CONCERNS FOR OUR ENVIRONMENT,
MAKING MONEY AND GETTING ELECTED,
EH 98% SEE HOW EASY IT IS TO GET ELECTED,
AND THATS WITHOUT A PIPE LINE .......................