My look at the leadership candidates begins with Topp, Mulcair and Nash.
The stakes are high and the field is crowded with highly competitive candidates. Cartoon by Greg Perry.

-
NDP leadership candidate Thomas Mulcair on his 'cap and trade' climate plan, economic 'realism,' playing to win, and more.
-
New Democrat leadership candidate on taxes, energy, Parliamentary representation, and more.
-
In NDP leadership debate, Peggy Nash stakes out territory party needs to conquer.
"No government can be long secure without a formidable opposition." -- Benjamin Disraeli, 1804-1881
On March 24, the New Democratic Party will choose Canada's new leader of the opposition -- and potentially the country's next prime minister.
One of eight contenders will take the torch from Jack Layton, who became the NDP's first-ever opposition leader after the 2011 election before tragically dying from cancer.
How hard will it be for the new NDP leader to win power?
Consider that Conservative Stephen Harper is the only opposition leader of seven to become prime minister since Jean Chretien took power in 1993.
Voters rejected Liberal opposition leaders Stephane Dion and Michael Ignatieff in the last two elections against Harper.
Reform Party leader Preston Manning and his successor Stockwell Day of the Canadian Alliance also failed to move from opposition leader to prime minister when facing off against Chretien.
And Bloc Quebecois separatists Lucien Bouchard and Gilles Duceppe both did a term -- but had no practical chance to become PM being isolated to running candidates only in Quebec.
So the task is tough and the job is huge. How will they do it?
I've had the opportunity to meet with most of the leading candidates privately in the past few months to get a sense of what drives them, and how they would perform as opposition leader and possibly prime minister in waiting.
This is the first of two columns, restricted by both space and time. My conversations were not interviews -- each candidate is doing lots of those -- but my attempt to gain perspective on their style and approach while learning more about their backgrounds.
As both a columnist and NDP member, I will be endorsing a candidate prior to the vote but have not yet made up my mind whom that will be.
Three candidates are perceived by most media to be in the so-called top tier: Montreal Member of Parliament Thomas Mulcair, Toronto MP Peggy Nash and former NDP president Brian Topp of Toronto.
While the other candidates may not only disagree but prove the pundits wrong when the voting ends, for now it's a useful dividing line.
In a future column I'll talk about the considerable abilities and chances of B.C. MP Nathan Cullen, Ottawa MP Paul Dewar, Manitoba MP Niki Ashton, Quebec MP Romeo Saganash and Nova Scotia businessman Martin Singh.
Brian Topp's rich resume
I've known Topp for over 30 of his 51 years, since we were both student journalists -- he with the McGill Daily in Montreal and I at the University of B.C.'s The Ubyssey, connecting through the Canadian University Press.
Brian Topp: Layton insider brings backroom experience.
Since then I have seen Topp at various points in his career -- most recently as executive director of the Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists (ACTRA) in Toronto, as Layton's national campaign director in the 2006 and 2008 elections and earlier as deputy chief of staff to then-Saskatchewan premier Roy Romanow.
Topp is attempting a big leap – from backroom party strategist who has never held public office to prime minister in waiting -- and to do daily battle with the formidable Harper.
But powerful people in the NDP are betting he can succeed. Romanow, former NDP leader Ed Broadbent, veteran B.C. MPs Libby Davies and Jean Crowder, new B.C. MPs Kennedy Stewart, Jinny Sims and Jasbir Sandhu, former B.C. NDP leader Carole James and many others are convinced and have endorsed Topp.
Topp can also rely on some of B.C.'s most experienced political staff working on his behalf, including former B.C. NDP campaign manager and provincial secretary Gerry Scott, former James' chief of staff Jim Rutkowski and senior James aide Raj Sihota.
In person, Topp is a fascinating combination. He has the strength to be self-deprecating, easily demonstrating his skills as someone who organizes workers and negotiates with some of the toughest employers in Canada, the TV and film industry.
A conversation with Topp makes you feel like you are being let in on big secrets, becoming a confidante and co-conspirator on even small issues over coffee at Tim Horton's.
Helped lead coalition plan
Topp is also extremely smart at politics. Layton's success in consecutively adding more seats to the NDP caucus in each election didn't happen either by accident or simply through the NDP leader’s enormous charisma -- Topp's strategy played a big role.
And when Layton attempted to topple the Harper minority Conservative government and replace it with an NDP-Liberal coalition with Bloc Quebecois backing, Topp was his lead negotiator, even writing a book on it titled How We Almost Gave the Tories the Boot.
I disagreed with the NDP's ill-fated coalition plan from the start but without question admire Topp's ability to almost achieve a remarkable result that would have seen Layton in cabinet and Harper in opposition.
Fluently bilingual and raised in Quebec but having worked for years in Saskatchewan politics and Ontario labour, Topp brings together all the elements one could imagine for success in the NDP.
But then, so do Mulcair and Nash.
For a backroom operative unknown to the Canadian public, Topp wisely used a pre-emptive shock and awe campaign launch, appearing to instantly be the frontrunner by rolling out the Broadbent endorsement and more -- a move that seemed to stun his potential opponents and galvanize early support.
Topp's current challenge remains his lack of a seat in Parliament -- and he has rejected the idea of running in a by-election to be called soon in Layton's former Toronto-Danforth riding, instead saying he will run in Quebec, although no seats are currently vacant.
Mulcair's 'royal jelly'
That problem doesn't exist for Thomas Mulcair, who led the early Layton breakthrough by winning a by-election in Montreal's longtime-Liberal stronghold of Outremont in and then helping build the NDP for the Orange Crush wave that devastated the Bloc Quebecois in 2011.
Thomas Mulcair: Polished political skills, and strong record in Quebec.
I first met Mulcair at a private lunch with Jack Layton in Vancouver in 2007 -- and was extremely impressed.
We met again last month and one thing is clear -- Mulcair easily comes across as someone who has the elusive "royal jelly" that distinguishes a great politician.
Confident without a hint of overconfidence, willing to disagree politely without rancour and with a polished style that shows his years in public office and as a senior lawyer, Mulcair makes a very strong and memorable connection.
His background, like Topp's but with different emphasis, is also ideally suited to becoming leader of the opposition.
Unlike most NDP MPs, Mulcair, 57, has served in a provincial cabinet, as environment minister in the Quebec Liberal government of Premier Jean Charest from 2003 to 2006.
Mulcair brought in a groundbreaking sustainable development plan but ultimately resigned from cabinet over an issue of principle, refusing to transfer lands from a provincial park to a private condominium developer.
The next year Layton recruited him as his Quebec lieutenant and he handily defeated the Liberals in a stunning by-election win that shocked the country that September.
It shouldn't have been as a surprise -- Mulcair has a record of success.
Mulcair's support in Quebec
Born in Ottawa, raised in Laval, north of Montreal, Mulcair worked in the Quebec justice ministry, then as president of the Quebec Professions Board and eventually being elected in 1994 for the first of three times as the Member of the National Assembly for the riding of Chomedey in Laval.
Mulcair has considerable support from Quebec, with 35 of the province's 59 NDP MPs supporting his leadership bid to date.
But Mulcair's greatest challenge is to convince New Democrats outside Quebec, where he is far less known.
Mulcair has the endorsements of former Manitoba NDP premier Ed Schreyer, B.C. NDP MLA Claire Trevena, North Vancouver Mayor Darrell Mussatto, University of Victoria climatologist Andrew Weaver, Doug McArthur -- a former deputy minister to ex-NDP premier Glen Clark and ex-Saskatchewan NDP cabinet minister; Michael Byers, a former federal NDP candidate and UBC professor; B.C. NDP vice-president Heather Harrison and a few non-Quebec MPs.
With British Columbia boasting more NDP memberships than any other province and almost six times more than Quebec, Mulcair has to both sign up more members in his home turf and win votes here and in Ontario, which has the second highest party total.
Peggy Nash's tenacity
Toronto MP Peggy Nash is the third "top-tier" candidate vying to lead the party and has the background to compete with both Mulcair and Topp.
Peggy Nash: Fluent in French, a fighter for women's issues and the environment.
Nash comes out of the labour movement as a long-time Canadian Auto Workers activist who started as a booking agent for a Canadian airline and rose to became the union's senior negotiator -- and in 2005, the first woman to lead bargaining with the auto industry in North America.
Nash is not only tough -- she is someone who doesn't give up.
Nash lost a close contest in Parkdale-High Park riding in the 2004 federal election, was elected in the 2006 election and appointed industry critic, but lost the 2008 election to ex-Liberal leadership candidate Gerard Kennedy.
Nash returned to work at the CAW as an assistant to president Ken Lewenza and was elected NDP national president in 2009.
Nash then won the 2011 rematch with Kennedy in the election to return to Parliament. Nash's background led Layton to appoint her finance critic. (Ironically, Brian Topp then replaced Nash as party president until himself running for leader.)
In person, Nash is poised, a skilful listener and a diplomat -- all traits found in the best negotiators, who know when to press and when to move to another subject.
Her style is different than both Topp's and Mulcair's, not only as a woman running for leader but as someone with a more social activist background who is seen as to the left of her competition.
Commitment to issues
Fluent in French with an honours degree in French language and literature, and fluent as well in Spanish, Nash is known for championing both women's issues and the environment.
She has also served as an international election monitor in both South Africa and the Ukraine.
Nash's candidacy has drawn endorsements from former federal NDP leader Alexa McDonough, B.C. MPs Denise Savoie and Randall Garrison, economists Marjorie Griffin Cohen of Simon Fraser University and Mel Watkins of the University of Toronto, Quebec MPs Anne Minh-Thu Quach and Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet, Rabble.ca president Duncan Cameron and Pierre Ducasse, a 2003 NDP leadership candidate and Quebec advisor to Jack Layton.
Nash's challenge is clear -- she must edge out both Topp and Mulcair, the perceived front-runners, while holding off a challenge from other candidates, particularly Cullen and Dewar, whose chances may depend on second and third choice selections from NDP members.
Nash needs to capitalize on her higher profile in Ontario and within labour to gain signups and support while also mining vote-rich B.C.
The NDP is undergoing simultaneous and enormous political changes, having to adjust to the traumatic loss of Jack Layton at the same time as it takes on the huge responsibilities of forming the official opposition, under the temporary leadership of Quebec MP Nycole Turmel.
None of these three leadership candidates nor the other five NDP contenders can possibly replace Layton. That's never been the goal.
But each of them believes they can follow in Layton's footsteps to succeed with his biggest project of all -- to not just supplant the Liberals to become the opposition but to form a social democratic Canadian government.
The next three months will determine who gets that opportunity to take on Stephen Harper, and what their chances are of success in 2015. ![[Tyee]](http://thetyee.cachefly.net/ui/img/ico_fishie.png)
Bill Tieleman is a regular Tyee contributor who writes a column on B.C. politics every Tuesday in 24 Hours newspaper. E-mail him at weststar@telus.net or visit his blog.
20
Login or register to post comments
stver
1 year ago
Leadership Contenders
Unfortunately, Bill, I think your overview of the candidates is superficial. While you may not want to tip your hand at this point, I would have liked to have seen a summary of what these candidates believe in and what they are proposing. It's nice to know who is endorsing them and what their backgrounds are, but what are they bringing to the table. Someone like Nathan Cullen may not have as many big name endorsements, but the things he is talking about and many of his proposals are very interesting. I think you should add a bit more meat the bones.
DPL
1 year ago
And some folks say the NDP
And some folks say the NDP are a boring bunch. That of course is simply not true. They are all committed to the cause of making Canada a better place to live.
And stver mentioned more meat to then bones, but Bill did say there will be tow parts to his column. Let's wait, watch and learn as much as we can for the folks looking to steer the party and eventually the country to better government
alive
1 year ago
Too bad!
Meat on the bones,eh?
Well, Tyee devotes 2 pages to the most uninteresting features, but cannot afford to do likewise on issues that matter.
shepsil
1 year ago
Which candidate can win the prize of a Federal election?
As a BC New Democrat, I am not surprised by how many of my fellow New Democrats have based their choices more on emotion than on reason.
Peggy Nash is the choice of more women than any other candidate, but will Canada elect a women as the next Prime Minister of Canada? At 62 she is the oldest candidate, so 66 for the next election, which makes her rather long in the tooth! Her connection to the CAW & Buzz Hargrove is not exactly a plus either.
Mulcair's reputation of being tough and/or overly abrasive and aggressive are positive attributes for some and not for others. Some are concerned he could destroy the chances of the NDP by moving us too close to the valueless centre, with the Liberals.
Topp, being just as French as Mulcair, is arguably more in touch with the grassroots of the party. He is widely given credit for the first ever Quebec win for Phil Edmonston in 1990. Previously, he ran campaigns in the Montreal East End, which is exclusively French working class. He is also the candidate that conservative media & pundits have targeted (attacked) as the potential leader with the best chance of beating Harper in the next Federal election.
Kreditanstalt
1 year ago
The problem is not the
The problem is not the candidates. The problem is the party, stuck in the 1960s and left behind in the dust ideologically.
They're economically inept dinosaurs; they need a new business model.
I greatly suspect that whoever is chosen as leader will make no difference...
Jonathan W.
1 year ago
Mulcair has endorsements from
Mulcair has endorsements from 35 MPs in total, not from 35 MPs of the 59-member Quebec caucus. Four of those 35 so far are from Ontario. He has 31 of the 59 NDP MPs from Quebec.
Wilf Day
1 year ago
Co-operation is what Quebec voters wanted
I see you reference your old opposition to the NDP's 2008-9 coalition plan, despite your acknowledgement then that "Canadians clearly want all parties to cooperate as much as possible in a time of economic crisis." They still do. Quebec voters in particular wanted parties to work together to stop Harper. They loved the 2008-9 Coalition. They still do. Ignatieff spent the 2011 election campaign saying "I could be standing here as the prime minister of Canada (but) I turned it down." This reminded Quebec voters that he had turned his back on them; only the NDP would work with others to oust Harper. Then in the leaders debate in 2011 Duceppe trotted out the time-worn argument about the Bloc being the only serious obstacle to Stephen Harper’s government, but Layton fired back, “But he’s still there.” Result: 59 Quebec MPs. If you are going to recommend a new leader based on ignoring Quebec's love for parties co-operating against Harper,your recommendation may be flawed.
Frank
1 year ago
Kreditanstalt
The 1960's? Because of our attachment to medicare etc?
By that logic your side is stuck in that period just before the Treaty of Westphalia (1648), you want to go back to the time before we had nation-states.
considerIT
1 year ago
Something missing
I often agree with you. But, I think you're missing the mark on all of these.
Mulcair is a risk in dividing the country on a Quebec vs everybody else front (including alienating our traditional base/support in favour of a misguided and reactionary attempt to hold onto QC support that is already slipping). He's an unstable record on both Israel and repeated desire to sell Canadian water to the US (without much foresight on how NAFTA will turn that into loss of all control over our environment). And they just aren't the values of our party.
Nash represents the old fashioned NDP. She might have a solid support base internally (all the usual endorsements), but she doesn't have the energy or ability to grow the support past our typical 15-20% (or whatever it was before Jack). And sadly – as Shepsil said above – her age is an issue because this isn't a 4 year job. This may take 9 years to play out, then we need somebody who can be Prime Minister for more than just one term (if that).
The support for Topp is the farthest off the mark. He doesn't connect with or "get" the average voter/person. And people just don't like backroom tacticians. Not that we don't want them on the team...but they aren't good leaders (see what just happened in Saskatchewan). Never been an MP himself and now he has to lead a caucus of new politicians in how to do a job he's never done???
We need a leader with energy, who connects to people and has the ability to grow support in every province and corner of this country. Somebody who gets the values our party was built from, and somebody who can show "non-typical NDP'ers" that this can and should be their home. The three you have listed here do none of that.
Granville
1 year ago
Martin Singh it is, then.
He is the one who sounds most like Jack Layton; a little bit scrappy and truculent, a potential leader in fact. We can't replace Jack but we can keep his attitude alive. anyone who wants to oppose Harper has to demonstrate the capacity to express anger, unfortunately. Singh looks like a guy who can answer Harper in The House.
carfreecity
1 year ago
Brian Topp
I do not want Topp to be the leader.
He does not speak in public very well
He grimaces and stumbles occasionally for words
He does NOT turn me ON.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
Mulcair's enthusiasm for the
Mulcair's enthusiasm for the fraudulent "free trade" treaties should be enough to wipe him off the slate.
So far Cullen is the only one who really makes sense.
The issue shouldn't be who has the political gimmicks to become PM, but what for ?
The world is heading into a major crash and depression, therefore the question should be, who has the best ideas on how to save people?
Especially in this country, where it would still be the easiest to come up with humanly and ecologically acceptable policies, because we still have room and resources, to lead the world toward sustainability and save humanity.
Where are the plans, who has them and what are they ?
Ed Deak.
greengreen
1 year ago
Great candidates!
What an embarrassment of riches! Wonderful people, all of them. Will be difficult to pick just one-similar to selecting the B.C. leader a few months ago.
What a contrast to the States where they have an embarrassment of idiots running for Republican leader.
edward01ca
1 year ago
What he Author Seems
to forget is that the 39% Harper "majority" happened because the NDP, Liberals, Bloc, and Greens split the remaining vote among them. It could very well happen again and Harper will once again his "majority". Nathan Cullen has the right idea about an alignment between the NDP and Liberals such that the two parties will not run oposing candidates in the same riding. If this had happened in the last election here in Parksville, we would not have the Christian fundamentalist Zionist we currently have.
considerIT
1 year ago
@edwardoica
If that had happened, we would not currently be sitting as the official opposition - as the majority of Quebec seats would never have had an NDP candidate to vote for.
It's a bit of an insult to democracy to have political parties picking and choosing who they, as average voters and families, have the right to support/align their values with. Talk about voter turn-off if we start playing political chess with the public...
Barryeng
1 year ago
I like Topp. He has a lot of
I like Topp. He has a lot of backroom skills, and can be credited with most of The NDP's current successes. It would be real shame to lose his political skills if he doesn't win. However, he IS a backroom boy, and I don't think that he has the necessary charisma as a "front-of-the-room politician" to win over the country.
My sincere hope is that Brian realizes that he is very valuable where he is, and that he steps back and throws his considerable skills and support behind another candidate with a more proven electoral record.
In this case, Nathan Cullen has been a winning MP for longer than than all the other candidates, and has good ideas, and good charisma. Cullen is my choice, and It would be great if he also becomes Brian Topp's choice.
Tieleman
1 year ago
Tieleman corrects article
My thanks to Jonathan W. for correcting an inadvertent error above - my fast read of Thomas Mulcair's website news was inaccurate - Mulcair has 35 MPs supporting him in total, with 31 from Quebec. The other 4 are from Ontario. My apologies.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
I think, Cullen is beginning
I think, Cullen is beginning to look better every day. He may not win against the propaganda pushing others, which will be a great mistake and loss.
Ed Deak.
shepsil
1 year ago
Peggy Nash a gender friendly candidate
Ms. Nash would make a great leader for the NDP, but the question that we have to ask ourselves is whether or not the Canadian public would vote in a woman as the next Prime Minister of Canada.
If I were the Conservatives, I would support Peggy Nash as the best chance for them to win the next election. But, if I were a woman in the NDP, I would be torn, but would vote for Cullen or Topp.
Chris_
1 year ago
Tieleman tries to gain perspective on their style and approach
As long as media and political parties continue to focus primarily on "style and approach" as Tieleman seems to, politics in Canada will remain so dumbed down that voter participation in our democracy will continue to wane. Somewhere between 40 to 50% of eligible voters do not cast a ballot.
I for one am sick of holding my nose every election when casting my vote. I will throw up, if I hear one more election campaign of meaningless slogans and platitudes from the political parties (a.k.a. “messaging”). What I want is an acknowledgement of the real problems and concrete strategies and policies to correct those problems.
Here are few things that immediately comes to mind.
1. Canadian governments have a revenue problem. This is not controversial. A major factor is the FACT that taxation policy has increasingly become more regressive in the past 30 years. What is the NDP plan to ensure the wealthy .5 % and major corporations pay their fair share of tax? The top marginal tax rate in the 1960’s was 80 and 53% respectively.
2. How is the NDP going to extricate Canada from the 20+ years of bad policy and law (i.e. the Washington Consensus) in order to genuinely institute fiscal and monetary policy for the benefit of ALL Canadians?
3. The threat of capital flight (real or imagined) by concentrated wealth constitutes a virtual senate that undermines democracy. What are the NDP plans to deal with this egregious attack on Canadian democracy?
Bill, perhaps the next time you have a conversation with the candidates you could ask the these questions.