- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Hockey Riot Report Gives Canucks Bosses a Pass
Booze and boos flowed inside rowdy Rogers Arena, but owners off the hook.
Placard left on street night of Stanley Cup riot in Vancouver. Photo courtesy of stevelesnow from Your BC: The Tyee Photo Pool.
If you didn't know anything about Vancouver and read "The Night the City Became a Stadium" -- the fancy title for the provincial government report on the 2011 Stanley Cup riot -- you'd be oblivious to the fact that Rogers Arena was just 400 metres away from where the city hall-sanctioned outdoor viewing party for 155,000 people turned ugly.
And you might not know that Rogers Arena was the city's biggest legal drinking establishment open that night, where most of the 18,860 ticketholders were hoping to witness the Vancouver Canucks end their 40th season with their first Stanley Cup championship.
The crowd included Mayor Gregor Robertson and Premier Christy Clark, benefactors of campaign donations from club and venue owner Francesco Aquilini. Aquilini was hoping the Stanley Cup would be awarded to the home team in his "house," just like the Olympic gold medal was on Feb. 28, 2010.
Before the Boston Bruins scored the 4-0 goal into an empty net with less than three minutes to go, a fire alarm had been activated at 7:37 p.m. and "many people" were being thrown out of Rogers Arena.
How many people were kicked out? Where did they go and what did they do?
The Sept. 1-published report, by former Nova Scotia deputy attorney general Doug Keefe and VANOC chief executive John Furlong, offers no hint whatsoever.
In fact, the report takes a hands-off approach to both the Canucks (who shared their record playoff profits with the National Hockey League) and Rogers Arena (the most important commercial venue for Furlong and VANOC).
Inside Rogers Arena
"Inside the arena, events appeared to unfold normally," said the report. "There were signs of revelry and booing. While the fans were clearly disappointed they showed respect for the Boston Bruins victory. Gary Bettman, the NHL commissioner, was regrettably booed heavily when he presented the Stanley Cup to Boston.
"In discussion with the review, Mr. Bettman said he did not feel the atmosphere in the building was abnormal although he did acknowledge the excessive booing."
Bettman wasn't simply booed -- he was subject to two minutes of hate. Objects were thrown at him as presented the Stanley Cup to Bruins captain Zdeno Chara. But you won't find that fact in the report.
"We believe that the vast majority of people who came out of Rogers Arena went home," Furlong said at the Sept. 1 news conference. "Some people went to downtown and the rest went home."
Pressed further, Furlong said: "We can't possibly put every single detail into the report, we'd be writing for months. If they had made a significant contribution, we would have said so."
We know about the 446 police on duty whose numbers swelled to 928 later that fateful night when reinforcements arrived from the suburbs.
Demon drink
There were just eight liquor inspectors on-duty in downtown Vancouver beginning at 2:30 p.m. They apparently saw no evil indoors.
"There is strong evidence that the problem with alcohol on the night of June 15 was public consumption -- not licensed venues," the report said. "VPD and liquor inspectors both reported there were no infractions in licensed premises."
A self-authored report by the Alliance of Beverage Licensees of British Columbia, which is contained in the city's internal review, claimed its members sold 50 per cent less liquor on June 15, 2011 than on Feb. 28, 2010 when Canada won the men's Olympic hockey gold medal in Vancouver. ABLE BC -- which lobbies government on behalf of bar and private liquor store owners -- doesn't mention that the Olympic final began at noon on a Sunday and the Stanley Cup championship puck dropped at 5:00 p.m. The organization claimed its clientele did not match the demographic of the rioters, but conceded only two establishments that responded to its survey reported seeing a liquor inspector on June 15.
"After the second period, when it was clear to many that sadly our Canucks would fail to bring home the Cup, there started to be something of an exodus of people who decided to beat the crowds and go home after a long and disappointing day," said the ABLE BC report. "At this point, we had decided not to allow new people in to watch the end of the game, and instead focus managing the end of a particularly long day."
Is it possible that the cocktail of booze and disappointment manifested itself outside, away from the licensed establishments?
The riot last time
In 1994, the B.C. Police Commission report on that Stanley Cup riot closely examined how the publicly owned Pacific Coliseum functioned as both the site of a viewing party and one of the feeder locations to the riot that erupted at the intersection of Robson and Thurlow.
No punches were pulled. Language in the report took direct aim at the business of professional sports, which is deeply reliant on the sale and promotion of alcohol.
"Crowd behaviour is wildly unpredictable in the best of circumstances and the hype that follows major sporting events in this country, combined with a multimillion dollar marketing interest in linking alcohol to sport, is beyond the control of any local jurisdiction, no matter how well coordinated," said the report, ordered by then-attorney general Colin Gabelmann.
On June 14, 1994, the Canucks were underdogs in Game 7 of the Stanley Cup at New York's Madison Square Garden. The Rangers won, disappointing the 8,300 people who paid $5 each to watch on a big screen in the Pacific Coliseum.
There were no Vancouver Police officers on-duty in the Rink on Renfrew. The Pacific National Exhibition was watching its budget and thought 61 ushers and security guards would suffice.
Attendees weren't searched for drugs or alcohol, many brought their own. Some bought their two beer limit at the concession stands, then returned to the back of the line, only to finish them by the time they returned to the front to buy two more. The crowd got rowdy during the second and third periods, with 40 people ejected from the venue.
Not a dime offered by Canucks
Among the recommendations of Furlong and Keefe is to encourage the Canucks and the NHL to be involved with future public viewing areas, when and if the team challenges again for the Cup.
"The Canucks were busy managing their internal affairs as the hottest ticket in town. There is no compelling evidence of attempts to meaningfully draw the organization into the delivery of downtown activities," the report said.
History says it won't happen in 2012: in the NHL's post-original six era, only the 1984 Edmonton Oilers and 2009 Pittsburgh Penguins were losers one year and champions the next. What's more, Stanley Cup losers endure the shortest and longest summer of any of the 30 teams.
The limited time off is clouded by lingering disappointment.
After initially denying the rioters were their fans -- even though most sported official merchandise -- the Canucks are now extending an olive branch. Chief operating officer Victor de Bonis wrote to city manager Penny Ballem on Aug. 23, but stopped short of pledging to help pay for this year's debacle or underwrite a similar public event in the future.
Some 1,000 police officers, firefighters, paramedics and cleanup fans will be hosted during an exhibition game. De Bonis revealed plans for the Oct. 6 home opener. The franchise wants to display the "message of hope" plywood boards in the concourse, show images of the June 16 riot clean-up volunteers on video screens and recognize local heroes during player trophy presentations. In-house, broadcast and poster ads will promote responsible celebration and respect for fellow fans and public property. There may even be funding for "an appropriate youth education initiative."
That's nice, but it doesn't do anything to help the city wrestle with the $1.97 million cost. On Sept. 6, the Vision Vancouver majority will draw $1 million from its contingency fund to pay for the man-made disaster, money it won't be able to spend should the city get hit by an earthquake or a heavy snowfall.
Meanwhile, Keefe can buy a lot of lobster with his $123,565 paycheque and unabashed Canucks fan Furlong can buy a lot of tickets with his $77,750.
Not bad for a summer job that is supposed to help politicians and police understand that terrible night when the city went crazy because of what went on inside 800 Griffiths Way. ![]()




14
Login or register to post comments
zalm
38 weeks ago
Belling the cat
As soon as I saw the dedication; "to the people who took back the streets" it was apparent the whitewash was going to be applied heavily.
I didn't get too far into the Executive Summary before I horked up my last sip of beer. Look at this disgrace!
"This report is best viewed through the lens of when the facts and a unique atmosphere collide. Some things we will never know but perhaps we really don’t need to. We know what we know and how we felt and that we would rather not feel that way again."
Two months and hundreds of thousands of dollars wasted - for this?
Somebody - in fact, quite a few people, beginning with Furlong and Keefe - should feel terribly, terribly ashamed.
G West
38 weeks ago
Nice catch zalm....
I take it you've 'read' a little Furlong before.
Funny how a phrase like that sticks out and points precisely to its creator.
Jesus.
We know what we know and how we felt and that we would rather not feel that way again.
I think the only reason Furlong pulled this duty was to handle 'reputational management'...
I'm sure you'll remember where 'that' quotation came from.
pianosaurus rex
38 weeks ago
The old proven proof
Are Furlong and this guy related?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aX6XMIldkRU
Gabelmann:
"Crowd behaviour is wildly unpredictable in the best of circumstances and the hype that follows major sporting events in this country, combined with a multimillion dollar marketing interest in linking alcohol to sport, is beyond the control of any local jurisdiction, no matter how well coordinated.”
Not exactly;
Alcohol served at any sporting event is a privilege not a right for the owners. A liquor license has to be applied for and accept by the Liquor Control Board before serving any tipple at any event or establishment in this province.
Bad record….. No license…….
So it is easy to see why the whitewashed report… and now suddenly we are hearing statements from De Bonis about how they would like to highjack the “message of hope “plywood boards and suddenly “recognize” all of the hundreds of people who cleaned up the mess not one of which was a Canuck employee……
Benevolence out of self interest doesn’t go over well; transparent as hell De Bonis…..October 6th home opener mentioned??
These people can’t help themselves with their sales pitch of the cheap sideshow and complete caricature that the NHL has become….….
Van Isle
38 weeks ago
Never mind what really
Never mind what really happened, the authorities will just cover-up, dress-over, point fingers in other directions on the root cause of the riots (as does other things that go wrong). Another word that is used often but doesn't seem to apply to them is "accountable". Just look at Gordo as an example; here's a man who has screwed up this province royally. Has he been taken to task? Nope, if anything he has been rewarded.
pianosaurus rex
38 weeks ago
Agreed Van Isle
Look at the immediate reaction to the riots; first it was the “anarchists” in our society that were responsible, then when the actual anarchists laughed at the notion, it was poor parenting along with a myriad of other lame excuses; make no mistake they were nothing but excuses…..
Study the video footage of what is available; not necessarily the primary focus of the camera but what you see in the sides or background shots…..
All middle class young people; drunk, drugged, ignorant and violent.
And the rest of the young people egging them on…..
You know when I was young and drunked up all we ever tried to do was get laid. Never spent anytime destroying anything except our own reputations….
terminalcitygirl
38 weeks ago
Grrrrrrr!
I'm so sick of having public enquiries conducted by overpaid Lieberal friends so they can manage the message and the steer the investigation to provide analysis that is absolutely useless.
So we paid these already wealthy folks $200K for this piece of garbage? How about citizens nominations to serve in a volunteer or honouraria type capacity for all of these special inquiries? Lord knows we've had enough in the past 10 years and they've cost us millions and provided little value except to the bank accounts of those hired to conduct them.
anarcho
38 weeks ago
And the anarchist scapegoats?
Where are the "anarchists" who initially got accused of starting the riot in this report? Not a word. Do we get an apology from the mayor and Police Chief for slandering us?
happy
38 weeks ago
No apologies for armchair anarchists
I thought "real" anarchists wanted to do away with governments and laws and police forces entirely.
And now you want an apology from those same institutions you want to overthrow, perhaps even violently?
Wow. Obviously Anarchy is much more complex than I thought
anarcho
38 weeks ago
No contradiction
Yes, anarchism is more complex than you think, Happy. We seek to replace authoritarian systems of governance with direct democratic, decentralized forms. The idea is to gradually reduce the level of authoritarian governance in society. Is that "overthrowing it with violence"?? When someone slanders you, no matter who that is, you have a right to demand some sort of apology or recompense - this is basic to all societies and ways of thinking including anarchism. As for being an "armchair anarchist", I have been an activist since 1965 - some armchair!
pianosaurus rex
38 weeks ago
another pov
The other way to view the authorities casting dispersions on anarchists is to ignore the insults entirely. To respond to them or press for an apology of sorts lends credence to their complaint or slight.
If you ignore them and do not respond their remarks are not validated by anyone with the exception of the doe-eyed acolytes that follow the authorities around endlessly…..
They only have the authority over the parts of your life that you allow them to have. They may take your freedom for a while BUT they will never take your spirit.
lynn
38 weeks ago
The Riotous Riot Report
High Irony Warning:
Furlong said the riots were caused by "thugs and villains and people who cheered them on".
Funny stuff.....and straight from the horse's mouth.
pianosaurus rex
38 weeks ago
Irony indeed
It is quite true Lynn. It was thugs, villains and people cheering them on. All of them dressed up in Canuck fans attire…..so when you wear your favourite team sports colours you are what…..
A FAN!!
So indeed it was ALL Canucks fans involved in the riots; after all, anyone who was not interested in the outcome like myself wasn’t attending either event; the crappily played game or the “source of entertainment” immediately thereafter.
But old Johnny boy couldn’t muster the intestinal fortitude to write that…….
The irony is not missed by many of us….. I love it….
RickW
37 weeks ago
anarcho
Can you tell me the difference between anarchism and libertarianism (not to detract from the topic at hand)?
Gerry McGuire
37 weeks ago
City Council video belies the current spin
Costs were spiraling out of control but Ballem tried to save the event so the Mayor could bask in the reflected glory of a Canuck's championship. Uh, woops...
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL70AA048DBE74E94B&feature=viewall