Opinion

Christy Clark Has Trust Issues

She's Lucy. The HST is the football. Are we all Charlie Brown?

By Bill Tieleman, 31 May 2011, TheTyee.ca

Charlie Brown comic

With gratitude and tribute to Charles Schultz.

Related

"I don't mind your dishonesty half as much as I mind your opinion of me -- you must think I'm stupid." -- Charlie Brown, as Lucy tries to persuade him to kick the football again.

Trust us.

Forget all the times we've broken our promises to you -- this time it will be different.

You have our word on it.

That's what the BC Liberal government is telling voters about the Harmonized Sales Tax.

Believe that they will introduce changes they pledged last week to bring in -- trying to buy your vote with your own money -- but only if you agree to keep the HST in the June binding referendum.

It's like cartoon character Charlie Brown running full speed to once again try kicking the football -- and having it pulled away as usual by his nemesis Lucy Van Pelt.

With the HST, Lucy's character is played perfectly by Premier Christy Clark. Big smile, sweet words: "This time you can trust me -- see, here's a signed document testifying that I promise not to pull it away."

British Columbians get to be Charlie Brown, the trusting soul who always gets tricked and ends up flat on his back yelling "Arrrgggh!" at his foolish mistake of believing Lucy once more.

That is, unless voters decide to not get fooled again.

Or unless they look at what a bad deal the HST changes really are.

The first part is simple.

Here's what Clark said on March 21 on Vancouver's CKYE Red FM 93.1 on why she would not cut the HST rate:

"We aren't going to be talking about trying to reduce it by a point or two before the referendum. I mean, I think people will see that as buying them with their own money," Clark said.

Now she's trying to buy us with our own money! She does think we're stupid.

And why give a $175 grant for every child under age 18 without any regard for the family income level?

Why give $175 to someone making $200,000 a year? Or $150,000 a year?

But guess who qualifies for that $175 grant -- Premier Christy Clark and Finance Minister Kevin Falcon, who each have a child.

Second, can you believe a BC Liberal government that said it wouldn't introduce an HST, then did so after the election, will cut the HST in 2012 to 11 per cent?

Or that three full years from now it will cut the HST to 10 per cent in 2014?

Can you trust a government that swore the HST would be revenue neutral, then admitted it would raise an extra $820 million a year?

Who can have faith in desperate BC Liberals who said in March 2010 that every dollar from the HST would go to health care, when that's just not true.

Why would you believe a government that promised a 15 per cent income tax cut for all British Columbians last October to convince us to support the HST and then rescinded the tax cut just weeks later?

Can anyone believe BC Liberals who first attacked NDP leader Adrian Dix for pledging to increase corporate taxes to pay for public services -- and then said they would hike corporate taxes to pay for the HST grants and lower rate?

On the HST changes themselves, most British Columbians will still pay more even if the BC Liberals actually do cut the rate to 11 per cent.

That's because you will still pay an extra six per cent on hundreds of goods and services.

The extra six per cent HST would still apply to restaurant food, basic cable TV, telephone, household cleaning, maintenance, and renovations, sports events, movies, gym membership, domestic plane, train or bus travel, taxis, parking, dry cleaning, vitamins, massage therapy, some school supplies, snack foods, haircuts and far more.

In three years if the rate is cut to 10 per cent you will still pay five per cent more on all these things than you did back in June 2009.

Is it any wonder the BC Liberal government is trying to buy your vote with a multi-million dollar ad campaign?

Or that big business is spending millions to keep the massive tax shift that makes consumers pay more and corporations pay less?

Trust us. Kick the HST football.

What could go wrong?  [Tyee]

24  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • notdarkyet

    38 weeks ago

    Trust

    It is all about trust

    I am trying my best to see both sides of the HST. Because I cannot see one side being more convincing than the other, I have to look at who is telling me what.

    Do I believe the Liberals who have lied since 2001?

    Do I believe big corporations as they stare into my eyes and say "we are here for the little guy; profits mean nothing to us."

    Do I believe all those business council ads on TV who would have us believe that their gain will eventually help us?

    Or do I believe the anti-HST crowd who seem to have nothing personal to gain from their stance?

    And I am particularly angry at our "new" premier who turns every statement into a families first comment as if the rest of the world is anti-family.

    She is a joke. The Liberal party is corrupt. They need to be punished in the same way the Socreds were in '91 and the NDP were in 2001.

    I would suggest we put them on their heels by eliminating the HST.

  • sspooner

    38 weeks ago

    Just another partisan rant

    Just another partisan rant from Bill Teileman. How about actually doing some work Bill, and considering how progressives can move beyond fearmongering, and address the complex (political and practical)interplay of productivity and redistribution without coming off as economic illiterates. Sure we can't trust these illiberal shysters, but the NDP must do more than oppose.

  • dashwood

    38 weeks ago

    truth issues

    again i am reminded of harry truman, who, referring to another politician, said something to the effect that son of a bitch can't tell the difference between lying and telling the truth.

    the man harry was referring to is known for his comment on a third politician, regarding that man's lack of success, due to the fact he had not learned how to lie to the public.

    as well as his best known quote "i am not a crook".

    christy also does not seem to know the difference between truth and lie, and has a conveniently short and selective memory.

    evidently, she could not remember the question, once she put her mouth in gear, and answered with what amounted to a propaganda speech.

    she is gordon campbell in a skirt, and the cast and crew is the same, just the seats have changed, but it is still the titanic, and they still are ignoring the icebergs.

    as an aside, why does she bring her kid with her, like a jw?

    it could open a psychoanalytic field day in the media, starting with the questionable parenting questions, and leading to the do as i say, not as i do questions.

    just a thought.....

  • bleepstorm

    38 weeks ago

    http://ajh.ca/clark_on_the_hs

    http://ajh.ca/clark_on_the_hst.html

  • DPL

    38 weeks ago

    Spooner asks what would the

    Spooner asks what would the NDP do? Dix and other NDP MLA's are pretty explicit and have pledged to get rid of the HST. Personally I can't see anything more clear. She has changed her position a number of times and even got ridiculed by those guys who are now her front bench. But they clap because the pay is good.

  • offended

    38 weeks ago

    According to Clark, I am one of the "Taliban"

    because I signed the fightHST petition. (CKNW, Nov. 2010).

    The woman is cold.

    Rich Families First.

    The Dinning Report says the average family pays $350 more in HST than they did PST/HST.

    Under the PST/HST they paid $1169. $350 more is a 30% increase in the amount paid.

    All so my former boss gets his cheque while sending my job to India. And that helps the BC economy how?

    The woman is cold.

  • Skywalker

    38 weeks ago

    Great column Bill!

    What she says and then does makes great commentary. The woman is not different than Campbell.

  • Vox.Pop

    38 weeks ago

    Voodoo Accounting

    The largest lobbying organization in Canada for reducing taxes on big business (the “Smart” Tax Alliance) is now paying big dollars for an advertising campaign on TV promoting the HST. We are expected to accept that when some accountants say something about this $2 billion dollar tax-shift from their clients onto the backs of the public we are to believe them. Ask people in small business why they go to an accountant and they will tell you that it’s to reduce their taxes – this is their accountant’s only expertise. They do NOT go to accountants for advise on how to grow their business or pay their employees more money, which is what these shills (or actors) on TV are talking about. Growing your business requires more customers buying your goods and services. A tax increase on your customers reduces the number of customers, not increases their number. This is why the HST is bad for any business in BC that sells directly to BC customers; forget the small savings in a business’s purchase taxes, its major increases in sales revenue that grows any business.

    When accountants start telling you that the HST will grow your business, the smart business people of BC should tell them that sounds like “voodoo accounting”, so just go back to counting the beans.

  • Fish-counter

    38 weeks ago

    Thanks for the article, Bill

    You are right and Christy is a dirty rotten louse. She is doing exactly what she said she wouldn't, only two months ago. Imagine that!

    It doesn't alter my view that on balance, the HST is a good idea. The old PST/GST system was a nightmare and we should accept the fact that many of the exemptions made very little sense.

    We have a combination of income tax and consumption tax that, on the whole, makes a lot of common sense. Back in the Dark Age, when Harold Wilson, then prime minister of Britain introduced a tax break on motorcycles, someone pointed out that his son had just bought one. I don't think Harold Wilson changed the tax laws to suit his son, and I don't connect the dots on Christy Clark either.

    Maybe we should call Christy Clark "Christy Campbell" if we want to poke fun at her, but I think she has a bit more credibility than her predecessor. She sure has a nicer smile and I get the feeling that if I met her, I would actually like her as a person.

    It is quite true what Sir Harry Flashman, the creation of George MacDonald Fraser, said in one of his novels:

    "The world can love an out-and-out brigand, but we hate a skulking villain"

    ...or something like that.

    All politics is about fresh hope followed by inevitable disillusionment. At least we get to elect a new Great White Hope every few years. We create the New Messiah in order to crucify him. That is the name of the game and it is no accident that we keep doing it.

    Do we really expect politics to change though? We consistently elect those politicians who make the most appealing promises, then we are disappointed when the civil servants force them to renege because there is no budget for heated, solid-gold public lavatory seats. We should be happy to have flush toilets.

  • Skywalker

    38 weeks ago

    Paying more with the HST....

    ...but, but.... she has a smile! Egads!

  • frank2

    38 weeks ago

    Why do we keep our debate

    Why do we keep our debate within the "reduce taxes now" mantra so successfully purveyed by the neocons?

    Our problem is not high taxes. It is insufficient revenues to finance needed public services from which everyone benefits.

    The HST has a vital role to play. Notwithstanding the fact that it is levied at point of sale, HST is really an income tax since all "value added" (that is, the labour, capital and rent inputs at each stage of production) is taxed at 12%. Adding it to regular income tax has the singular advantage of reducing incentives for evasion.

    If exemptions are minimised, HST is also efficient. For example, what is the public welfare justification for exempting restaurant meals?

    On the negative side, HST is regressive. Its regressivity is only partly ameliorated by HST credits to low income earners (at least, to that better-off sub-set who submit tax returns).

    Increasing progressivity of the tax system can be best done by raising higher marginal rates of income tax, and slashing the exemptions and deductions which mainly favour the better off -- starting with removing the special treatment of income from capital gains -- and getting rid of medical insurance premiums (or making them more progressive than at present).

    If voters support the HST this summer, I hope the NDP will drop the HST issue. Let's on the need to arrest the deterioration in public services (and the environment) and finding fairer ways to pay for that.

  • G West

    38 weeks ago

    frank2

    I still maintain that there is another point which needs to be underlined.

    This referendum is the first demonstration of effective democratic power being brought to bear upon a government which would otherwise have ignored the problems with a 'regressive' tax shift.

    Only by taking this action to its logical conclusion and rejecting the HST altogether (and that means going back to the GST/PST system) can there be any hope of re-engaging ANY government in productive and worthwhile negotiations about how the tax system needs to be changed. And you're absolutely correct about some of the things you've mentioned.

    But, right now, if we fail as citizens to underline our feelings about the way government behaves (with the same determination that we used to sign those petitions that got us to this point in the first place) by not rejecting the HST and forcing them to go back to first principles then this democratic "revolution" will have been in vain.

    Now is NOT the time to let up on the gas pedal - this thing needs to be driven home with a vengeance.

    Vote "YES" to dump the HST and "YES" to indicate that democracy and citizen participation and acquiescence can no longer be taken for granted in this province.

    Bringing this decision to a positive conclusion can be the beginning of a whole lot more. Voting "NO" simply means giving up!

  • Vox.Pop

    38 weeks ago

    Three Card Monte

    just watch these 150 Public Affairs Bureau (PAB) bloggers earn their excessive salaries ($100,000 each of our tax money, courtesy of the BC Liberals). They are beginning to realize that out & out support for the HST marks them as PAB trolls so they now appear to be 'reasonable'. OK, so "Gordo, the Liar" was a little too hasty but Prissy Chrissy has fixed all the problems, so now the HST "on balance" is a better tax than the ancient PST.

    WRONG, the HST is such a huge tax grab from the BC public that the BC Liberals can continue their masters dirty work - reducing taxes (by $3 billion per year since 2005). It is NOT a sales tax issue: PST vs. HST, as these stooges would have us believe but a sneaky way for the rich & greedy (CEOs & major shareholders of large companies) to pay a lot less tax - forever.

  • puppyg

    38 weeks ago

    I trust that the Liberals

    I trust that the Liberals will continue to do to us what they've been doing to us for years.

    (No, not that, though they have been doing that to us all. I meant lying to us.)

    Who wants bribe money to vote for the HST? Line up, Folks, for your cash. Families first!

  • Camero409

    38 weeks ago

    Fish-counter

    Your a PAB! You would like somebody if you met them even if they screw you when you turn your back? Spoken like a true PAB. You subliminaly suggest we should like her because she has a "nice smile" and you suggest she has more credibility? How can you say that when 2 months previously she said "We aren't going to be talking about trying to reduce it by a point or two before the referendum. I mean, I think people will see that as buying them with their own money," and then does exactly that. I bet you enjoy your $100,000 a year!

  • Okanagan Orchardist

    38 weeks ago

    One group likes the HST...

    You might be interested to know that there is one group that likes the HST. The Agriculture Council of BC has taken out a full page ad in the monthly "Country Life in BC" suggesting that all of BC's farmers should take it upon themselves to promote the HST among their friends and neighbours.

  • Skywalker

    38 weeks ago

    Then there is John Winter ...

    ... who on Sean Hollman's blog admits that the HST is good for business. The only thing good for business is more profit. Yeah, and where is it coming from? A for the Agricultural Council of B.C., most of these guys are right- wing ie BC liberals. ( MOST)

  • shedding_light

    38 weeks ago

    And not only that...

    As a person on the meagre allowance the Province allows for the severely disabled, this HST impacts me enormously. As Bill T. pointed out in the article, Ms. Clark is apparently offering the bribe for families with children and for seniors, but entirely forgetting or ignoring how much this tax affects the ability of those with only a disability allowance to even survive with minimal food and shelter. I guess we don't warrant a bribe even, she's ignoring us completely, as pitiful as her token payment is, compared to the harm this tax is doing to all British Columbians except maybe those in the top few percent who control most of the "wealth."

    As Bill said, there's no way to get around the simple fact that the tax takes a burden from the corporations and places it on those precious families she's always pretending to care so much about, as well as all vulnerable low-income folks.

    Having to live rurally because I'm unable to tolerate a more polluted urban environment, I have to keep a vehicle to access even basic essentials, though I try to limit my use of it to a half a dozen trips a year, since it's about an hour each way to town and I can't afford the gas, either. Yet the HST will be charged on the labour portion of vehicle repairs, making them even more un-affordable for someone with such a small income.

    Also I make almost all of my own clothing so I can control the fibre and chemical content and have things that are comfortable for me, but this tax now considerably increases the cost of the yarn and the raw materials I need, which didn't have PST before. It makes it much more difficult to purchase such things, and as a result I have drastically reduced my yarn purchases, held off on needed vehicle maintenance, and in fact avoided all possible purchases, waiting to try to get rid of the tax! Even the food supplements I need, like Spirulina, that help me maintain my health somewhat, which only had GST before, are now increased by another 7%, so I am trying to buy less of them. So much for boosting the economy, eh, Christy?!

    Sure, we'll pay the extra tax when we absolutely have to, but many of us will look for alternatives and ways to avoid it. It's hard to justify spending money on things that are now enough more costly that it's tempting to do without them, for the sake of self-respect and to prove, if only to ourselves, that we're not as stupid as Lucy (I mean Christy) thinks we are. And I'm voting YES to extinguish the HST.

    When I get a chance, I'll try to vote to extinguish the BC Liberal Party, too, no matter what fake ID they come up with!

  • shedding_light

    38 weeks ago

    Thanks to G West for his comment...

    Yes, even beyond all of the issues around the details of the tax and all of the ensuing complications the BC Liberals have muddied the waters with so you'd need a computer program to figure out the real numbers or how any of it plays out, ultimately...what matters most to me is that a Citizens' Initiative was successful and I hope it won't be the last we bring! So I do really want the HST extinguished to send a clear message to all of us who had the courage to stand up and object to being treated like cattle or statistics ~ we can do this! BC is capable of self-governance! At least, it's a start.

    There's still a long way to go to genuine democracy and self-governance, but this would be a good beginning and I think it would succeed in motivating people in BC to become more involved in their local communities socially, as well as politically. Politically, I think our best over-all change would be to dump the whole political party system and organise our communities ourselves so we can elect accountable MLAs who can't leverage against our interests through a powerful political machine.

    We need to demand the ability to place and change our votes whenever we see fit, and permanent electoral offices in every community and neighbourhood, so we have a place to discuss and share information and ideas about what we really want our province to be like. The political parties all divide and conquer, and they are the only beneficiaries of that system, along with their corporate sponsors. It's never going to be a system that works for voters, and the electoral system will only change if we do it ourselves, from the bottom.

    Even those at the top who admit it would be better can't bring themselves to let the voters really have the power, so we have to demand it through a new Citizen's Initiative and refuse to take "No" for an answer from any political party. I'd rather discuss my disagreements about policy or methods with my fellow citizens than with someone who's basically an elected dictator, regardless of party or gender.

  • Terry J. Nanaimo

    38 weeks ago

    C'mon folks...trust Christy Clark...

    ...Not! This political leader has more nerve than a mouthful of broken teeth.

    Less than 24 hours after election in Vancouver/Point Grey...on CKNW's Bill Good pgm. , Clark declares she won't necessarily seek re-election in...Vanc./PT. Grey.

    This swift slap in the face should be met with a quick kick in the ass for BC Liberals come election day.

    Why shake hands with your abuser?

    Get no respect? Give no respect.

    It is time for change in British Columbia.

  • Tieleman

    38 weeks ago

    It's spelled T-I-E-L-E-M-A-N - even PABsters know that!

    C'mon sspooner - you can't spell my name right when it's at the top of the column? Ha-ha - but you use lots of $10 words - or should we say $100,000 words?

    It's not my job to outline the NDP platform - but they obviously have a clear position on the HST - and unlike Christy Clark or Kevin Falcon they haven't changed it constantly since July 2009.

    To Frank2 - if the HST is a consumption tax, why did the BC Liberal make sure luxury vehicles over $55,000 cost less with the HST?

    But you are right that it is regressive - because lower and middle income earners spend proportionately more of their money on the HST than upper income earners. It's that simple.

    Lastly, if progressive folks don't oppose a bad, unfair tax, how will they defend fair taxes? That's why the HST can only find support from big business and the BC Liberals.

  • sspooner

    38 weeks ago

    Dumping the HST is cynical

    Dumping the HST is cynical populism, not sound policy. Addressing the limitations of existing taxation policy (as per Frank2)respects people's intelligence, rather than panders to their ignorance.

  • G West

    38 weeks ago

    sspooner

    Dumping the HST is not cynical - it's essential.

    Respect is earned, not doled out like candycanes to the poor at Christmas - while every child gets $175.00 no matter how much their mommy and daddy earned...In fact, if you wanted a better definition of pandering, you'd go a long way before finding a more appropriate one than Christina's phony 'fix' for the utter botchup they made of this tax shift.

    Intelligence requires some analysis - I have seen neither analysis nor intelligence from the pro-HST forces on this file.

    In fact, they've been playing catch up from the time the puck was dropped.

    Nothing new here.

  • jim1966

    38 weeks ago

    Just Vote Yes

    We have to, it's simple (provided that the ballots will even get mailed to us if the posties walk). We are struggling under this government's "Families First" agenda, which apparently does not or omits people like me, you know anyone who is 18+,single,gay or lesbian and the disabled or for that matter anyone living on a fixed income. Ms Clark's government still seems to ignore those most in need and it shows very badly I might add. I know that if the HST is defeated the cost of living will at best be a bit more tolerable. I had to think long and hard about my vote and what it means. There was only one real solution. Vote yes and scrap this tax and then vote out the BC Liberals. If we can accomplish these things we as a society can restore some "sanity" to our lives. Remember, Circle Yes on your ballot.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.