- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Harper's Crime Floggers
The case of the Macdonald Laurier Institute, key accomplice to Tories in their assaults on truth.
Attempted heist: How to steal headlines without facts to back them up.
Crime rates are rising, crime rates are rising, crime rates are rising...
Say this often enough and it becomes official truth. That seems to be the strategy devised by the Harper government and its current think-tank squeeze, the Macdonald Laurier Institute.
In February 2011, the Ottawa-based institute released a study which purported to prove that Statistics Canada was cooking its books about the direction of crime statistics.
StatsCan has reported that the incidence of crime has been declining for several decades.
Not so, argues Scott Newark, a former Alberta Crown prosecutor, in a recent Macdonald Laurier Institute (MLI) report. He lays out what he claims are the many shortcomings in the data collection and reporting and the ensuing erroneous generalizations the media disseminate to the public. Newark concludes the state is not doing its duty to protect citizens from crime because the state is not receiving accurate information about the incidence of crime.
The study arrived at a convenient time for the Harper government, which may be going into a spring election in which its tough-on-crime agenda will certainly come under attack.
On Mar. 16, the Conservatives revealed that the 18 crime bills before Parliament would cost $631 million, on top of the cost of expanding prisons, which they had claimed earlier would be $2.1 billion over five years. The opposition parties all insisted the cost would be much higher.
But the usefulness of the MLI report for the Harper Tories could be limited. Many of Newark's claims were quickly shot down by leading criminologists. See here and here for some important critiques.
Prisons for unreported criminals?
The study makes much of the notion of unreported crime. If there is such a thing, then Statistics Canada's information would be next to useless, since StatsCan data is collected from police reports.
This reality-redefining campaign was kicked off by Treasury Board President Stockwell Day in the autumn of 2010 and seconded by current Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, who said recently: "It's not that crime rates are falling. The reporting of crime is in fact falling." We need to build more prisons in part because of this rise in unreported crime, is the Tory assertion.
Day claimed that 88 per cent of sexual assaults go unreported to the police. But this number actually comes from a separate StatsCan survey, which asks the question: "During the past 12 months has anyone ever touched you against your will in any sexual way (unwanted touching, grabbing, kissing or fondling)?"
These are certainly examples of assaultive behaviour, says Vancouver Island University criminologist John Anderson, but hardly sex crimes. Most respondents who experienced this behaviour did not report it to the police, they told StatsCan interviewers, because "the incident was not important enough."
Nonetheless, these and similar activities are at the heart of Conservative arguments for more prisons.
Macdonald Laurier's ties to Harper's team
The Macdonald Laurier Institute is headed by Brian Lee Crowley, who claims his think tank is "non-partisan," but perhaps coincidentally, only conservative ideas are disseminated. And even more coincidentally, these ideas are of great value to the Harper government.
The institute has proposed, for instance, that pensions don't need to be boosted, that terrorists in Canadian prisons need to be put in isolation so they can't radicalize entire prison populations, that user fees and private health care are eventually inevitable for medicare, and that Canada needs to deepen its economic integration with the U.S.
Is the Macdonald Laurier Institute providing intellectual cover for the Harper agenda? And how close is it to the Harper government? The official Government of Canada website carries the brand name "The True North Strong and Free;" Crowley's brand is "The True North in Canadian Public Policy."
Scott Newark actually worked briefly as a special advisor to Stockwell Day when Day was minister of Public Safety. Newark then went on to work as project manager overseeing a $300,000-plus contract from his former ministry.
Newark also did a stint as executive director of the Canadian Police Association, where he expressed the startling opinion that "anything effective in law enforcement will inevitably be forbidden under the Charter (of Rights and Freedoms). As we say, the Charter helps only murderers, pedophiles and judges..." (Joe Woodard, "Rumblings of a counter-revolution," Alberta Report, Jan. 19, 1998, p.10)
When Crowley was starting up his organization, federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty hosted a private dinner at Toronto's Albany Club to raise support for Crowley's think tank. Flaherty wrote a letter inviting corporate executives to the event. In it, he said he was "giving it my personal backing... and I hope that you will consider doing the same... My office will follow up with you." Was the finance minister using his office to raise funds for the new think tank?
They were certainly already well acquainted. In 2006, Flaherty appointed Crowley the Clifford Clark Visiting Economist in Flaherty's finance department, where Crowley gave policy advice -- on what we can only imagine -- to the new Harper government. Four months later, while still working in the finance department, Crowley incorporated the think tank.
Harper's new chief of staff Nigel Wright was then a trustee of Peter Munk's Aurea Foundation, which gave Crowley $100,000 to help get his think tank up and running.
Pushing the wedge
This is just the latest example of the Harper government and neoliberal think tanks working together, in this case to convince Canadians crime is an epidemic and government must crush it with an iron fist.
With his tough-on-crime agenda, Harper is playing to the social conservatives in his coalition, and the Macdonald Laurier Institute is there to help. It is chaired by Rob Wildeboer, a wealthy evangelical Christian who is chief backer of the ECP Centre, which attacks human rights commissions as instruments of Christian persecution.
Marci McDonald, author of The Armageddon Factor, explains that as the ECP Centre sees it, "the very notion of legally protected individual rights is an unthinkable heresy, a repudiation of God's sovereign law."
An eye for an eye seems to be the order of the day. Or incarceration for an unwanted kiss.
Can the theocratic state be far behind? ![]()




30
Login or register to post comments
frank2
1 year ago
Is the MacDonald Laurier
Is the MacDonald Laurier institute just another organisation spouting a right wing ideology with the help of tax deductible donations from corporations and fat cats?
Rolf Auer
1 year ago
Time for the Tories to go
"The Tories and Canada are Incompatible" (longish article)
(check "CBC biased? Say it ain't so!" and "Why is Stephen Harper Prime Minister?" too. (longish articles))
www.clearpolitics.wordpress.com
(Click "About" re reading posts, or on my picture.)
@Rolf_Auer
demotto
1 year ago
Crime is
Crime is running rampant but it is in the halls of government that it is occurring. The unreported crime is the government employees not reporting the crimes being committed by themselves and co-criminals. We need to jail every singe MLA, MP or whatever other title they claim. The whole political and judicial system is run by criminals we need to arrest, try and jail the lot of them.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
These think tanks,
These think tanks, especially the "prestigious conservative economic think tanks" are nothing more than advertising, PR agencies paid by the corporate mafia to spread the mental enslavement of people by propaganda.
In any case, what's the complaint against crime and how do we decide what crime really is, when the people and corporations who are paying for the propaganda coming our of these PR agencies, are ruining more lives, causing more poverty and environmental damage every day, all over the world, under the guise of "competition", than all the criminals in jails for relatively minor crimes?
Wealth can not be created, only taken and crime and war are the ultimate forms of economic competition.
Just watch for the great wealth creating schemes, otherwise known as he sale of the country from under the citizens' feet, if Harper ever gets a majority.
The worst scenario anybody could imagine, yet a distinct possibility under the present economic crime wave enslaving and destroying the world.
Ed Deak.
big trees
1 year ago
@demotto
are you trying to spread the b.s that it's govt that's the problem, justifying reducing the size and power of govt.? When it's clear it's the corporate elitist agenda that's the problem here. My MP is NDP and he's certainly not part of the problem, nor are many many civil servants. I support anyone committed to attacking corporate white collar crime, but the Con agenda is completely off base and based on ideological garbage.
demotto
1 year ago
big trees
When the government is complicit in the corporate elitist agenda to turn back the clock on all social gains then yes they are the problem. Your NDP MP must be blind and mute as the NDP has not tried to expose the corruption within government so the only conclusion can be that they are just as dirty and corrupt.
Your pseudonym is wishful thinking on your part that the elite controlled government mafia will leave any?
cboo44
1 year ago
Figures Don't Lie, But Liers Can Always Figure
Police departments across Canada are forever "batching files" to contract the number of case complaints to make it look like they are doing good work, then 6 months later, UNBATCHING those same files in order to make it look like they are overwhelmed with work and need more officers.
Reality is that people don't bother to REPORT some crimes anymore, because nothing is ever resolved. Thieves are not charged or prosecuted,because police and prosecutors are "too busy".
STOP with the analyzing of "paper statistics", ! [COMMENT ADVOCATING VIOLENCE REMOVED. -MODERATOR.] No doubt there would be a sudden drop in REAL crime stats and a commensurate drop in the cost of any "Crime Bill".
average man
1 year ago
Wow. Some of you people are scarier than Harper.
"people, caught in the act of a crime, are Immediately killed on the spot by citizens"
"We need to jail every singe MLA, MP..."
bicycleboy
1 year ago
Tories will not budge in crime
An interesting anecdote...
A friend of a friend of mine works in a position that puts her right inside the Tory caucusroom. Apparently the Tories are not entirely without ears or eyes when it comes to receiving feedback and new information as it pertains to policy direction. She told my friend that she's observed a number of instances when they actually listened to news that contradicted their set of assumptions and adjusted their policy accordingly...
Except when it came to anything to do with their crime legislation!
That, apparently is a sacred cow and is not to be disturbed. One could throw any statistics at them contradicitng their claims that Canada's crime rates are rising and that more prisons, policing and harsher penalties are needed to stem this wave of terror that threatens this great land. No amount of credible, reliable information that may contradict their direction will cause them to waver.
Obviously the "tough on crime" thing is a great electioneering strategy, and they are not going to give it up. They may have to manufacture their own evidence to convince us, that's all. So be it.
janetvickers
1 year ago
Power eats life
Power is god and god is power - everything must serve power, and nothing - not civil society, justice or the earth must get in the way. Guns, bombs and prisons are the priests now.
Life is periphery, and anything that supports this survival will or is working on the radicalization of the current regime.
RickW
1 year ago
The Harper Government (not the Government of Canada)...
...Has found yet another way to shovel public money into private pockets. This time it's to build and maintain prisons:
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-18527338.html
Harper's intention to build more prisons, while not being labelled "private" or "for-profit" institutions, is but a single step away from being such.
And the "beauty" (as demonstrated in the Harper's Magazine article) of the government paying for-profit businesses to run prisons, is that it can always ensure a steady stream of inmates by passing draconian laws, designed to feed bodies into these instituions.
Van Isle
1 year ago
Question: What's the
Question: What's the difference between God and the Prime Minister? Answer: God doesn't think he's the Prime Minister.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
Lies, damned lies, and
Lies, damned lies, and statistics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"Lies, damned lies, and statistics" is a phrase describing the persuasive power of numbers, particularly the use of statistics to bolster weak arguments, and the tendency of people to disparage statistics that do not support their positions. It is also sometimes colloquially used to doubt statistics used to prove an opponent's point.
The term was popularised in the United States by Mark Twain (among others), who attributed it to the 19th-century British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli (1804–1881): "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." However, the phrase is not found in any of Disraeli's works and the earliest known appearances were years after his death. Other coiners have therefore been proposed. The most plausible, given current evidence, is Englishman Sir Charles Wentworth Dilke (1843–1911).
The real question is whether God believes in statistics?
Ed Deak.
paisley
1 year ago
Tough on crime
Getting tough on crime is simply job creation for lawyers and law enforcement. While Tories claim they wish to reduce government, most realize these are hollow words. The forces that would least benefit from decriminalization of drugs line up and force non-secular values on Canadians, making it obvious their motivations are purely selfish.
These claims from the righteous establishment are simply a deflection to keep Canadians baffled with the stated falsehood "increasing level of violent crime ". The friends of corporate Canada, MSM, are doing their best with "Fear Media" and if you repeat it enough it becomes true.
It is not in the interest of the "at the tough" Justice system to make changes that would reduce their role and they are always delighted to pile more on their plate.
The self righteous Tories are their kind of guys.
Skywalker
1 year ago
Harper's vision.
Getting tough on crime is one of those 'hot button' issues that resonates with a lot of folks who rarely make an effort to consider the real causes. It is also a convenient way to funnel money to the private sector to build these monuments to social policy failure. It is not a surprise that the Conservative?reform movement hitches its fortunes on the simplistic notions. It is much more difficult to address the issues around prevention, poverty and education. Harper wants us all to be more like the U.S.. Soon we will have thew same percentage of the population behind bars and then there will be a push to privatize the whole corrections system. Oh the money too be made!
Elizabeth Woods
1 year ago
Preventing crime
The biggest generator of crimes--both those with victims and those without; and reported or not reported--is the war on drugs. Harper and company should be recognized for what they are: Organized crime's Best Buds.
The single most effective move to seriously cripple organzied crime, while simultaneously relieving pressure on police, courts, and prisons, as well as making the rest of us much safer, is to repeal that unholy conglomerate of laws which constitute the brain-dead attack on a medical problem (when drug use is a problem, which in many instances it is not.)
Any cartoonisist around? I'd love to see a drawing of Harper with his arm around a hulking biker who has one hand in the public's pocket and a vote for the Tories in the other.
RickW
1 year ago
Harper's Speech to right-wing Council for National Policy
http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/SpecialEvent7/20051213/elxn_harper_speech_text_051214/
Partial text:
Ladies and gentlemen, let me begin by giving you a big welcome to Canada. Let's start up with a compliment. You're here from the second greatest nation on earth. But seriously, your country, and particularly your conservative movement, is a light and an inspiration to people in this country and across the world.
Now, having given you a compliment, let me also give you an insult. I was asked to speak about Canadian politics. It may not be true, but it's legendary that if you're like all Americans, you know almost nothing except for your own country. Which makes you probably knowledgeable about one more country than most Canadians.
But in any case, my speech will make that assumption. I'll talk fairly basic stuff. If it seems pedestrian to some of you who do know a lot about Canada, I apologize.
I'm going to look at three things. First of all, just some basic facts about Canada that are relevant to my talk, facts about the country and its political system, its civics. Second, I want to take a look at the party system that's developed in Canada from a conventional left/right, or liberal/conservative perspective. The third thing I'm going to do is look at the political system again, because it can't be looked at in this country simply from the conventional perspective.
First, facts about Canada. Canada is a Northern European welfare state in the worst sense of the term, and very proud of it. Canadians make no connection between the fact that they are a Northern European welfare state and the fact that we have very low economic growth, a standard of living substantially lower than yours, a massive brain drain of young professionals to your country, and double the unemployment rate of the United States.
In terms of the unemployed, of which we have over a million-and-a-half, don't feel particularly bad for many of these people. They don't feel bad about it themselves, as long as they're receiving generous social assistance and unemployment insurance.
That is beginning to change. There have been some significant changes in our fiscal policies and our social welfare policies in the last three or four years. But nevertheless, they're still very generous compared to your country.
Let me just make a comment on language, which is so important in this country. I want to disabuse you of misimpressions you may have. If you've read any of the official propagandas, you've come over the border and entered a bilingual country. In this particular city, Montreal, you may well get that impression. But this city is extremely atypical of this country.
While it is a French-speaking city -- largely -- it has an enormous English-speaking minority and a large number of what are called ethnics: they who are largely immigrant communities, but who politically and culturally tend to identify with the English community.
TYRONE
1 year ago
The Criminals are in "the house"!
Seeing the actions of someone who is supposed to be a Canadian for Canadians, show clearly that he is a puppet, manipulated by the same group as his counterpart in the us of a.
The sooner we replace him, the better!
We need to take back our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and become a whole lot more active in taking charge of our own affairs. We also need to abrogate all damaging trade agreements now!
cyberhino
1 year ago
Unreported Crimes
This band of brigands is engaging in Treason, Subversion, Fraud and Theft right under our noses. These are major crimes. I daresay there's a good bit of unreported Bestiality too.
Who do we call, Crimestoppers?
tobeornottobe
1 year ago
Harper's Tough on Crime Bills
For some considerable time an overwhelming number of canadian citizens have complained of the inadequacy of the sentencing procedures meted out by our judges. The lenient sentences imposed - particular upon repeat offenders - has caused considerable alarm in communities across Canada. The police forces constantly wring their hands when after exhaustive police work guilty criminals are given a slap on the wrist and released back into the community after a very brief jail term, or a suspended sentence. Repeat offenders and dangerous criminals are the bane of canadian society. With the public at risk from these criminals there has been an overwhelming demand upon our politicians to toughen the laws and ensure that our judges impose mandatory sentences. For a considerable number of years the federal liberals, and their step sisters the NDP have acted as 'sob sisters' in regard to canada's criminal population. First and foremost the public must be protected, and not be subject to whims of dangerous criminals, and repeat offenders who have benefitted from inadequate sentences. Obviously suitable conditioning should be given to all prison inmates while they serving their sentence. But on no account should they be released before their sentence elapses.
I am pleased that Mr Harper is tackling this whole issue head on and responding to the wishes of an overwhelming number of citizens.
RickW
1 year ago
tobeornottobe
http://www.employeescreen.com/iqblog/criminal-recidivism-rates-in-canada/
More jails aren't going to be much help with recidivism. In fact, more jails will only exacerbate the situation.
Camero409
1 year ago
Jails for Criminals?
I think not. These jails are being constructed for profit and I believe, for the upcoming protests against the conservatives.
"It's not that crime rates are falling. The reporting of crime is in fact falling." What increase in crime? There isn't any and they know it. They know the Conservative/Bilderberg agenda is going to cause problems and they are building for the future. G20 was a warm up and the worst for the Con/Bilderbergers is coming soon.
cyberhino
1 year ago
Build it and they will come
Gwyn Morgan's SNC-Lavalin is in a good position to profit here. They can build the jails (like in Libya) and provide "security consultants" to staff them.
RockyRacoon
1 year ago
These think tanks and astro-turf billionaire movements have been
a part of Harper's political armamentarium since he started in Politics-this speech he gave to a right wing christian republican group when he was a member of Nationl Citizens Coalition, why more hasn't been made of this I have no idea but it would destroy anyone else in politics. Are people getting warnings or something. I don't hear bacck from anyone I send it to and I found it on CTV website: Full text of Stephen Harper's 1997 speech
Canadian Press
Date: Wednesday Dec. 14, 2005 9:20 PM ET
OTTAWA — The text from a speech made by Stephen Harper, then vice-president of the National Citizens Coalition, to a June 1997 Montreal meeting of the Council for National Policy, a right-wing U.S. think tank, and taken from the council's website:
Ladies and gentlemen, let me begin by giving you a big welcome to Canada. Let's start up with a compliment. You're here from the second greatest nation on earth. But seriously, your country, and particularly your conservative movement, is a light and an inspiration to people in this country and across the world.
Now, having given you a compliment, let me also give you an insult. I was asked to speak about Canadian politics. It may not be true, but it's legendary that if you're like all Americans, you know almost nothing except for your own country. Which makes you probably knowledgeable about one more country than most Canadians.
But in any case, my speech will make that assumption. I'll talk fairly basic stuff. If it seems pedestrian to some of you who do know a lot about Canada, I apologize.
I'm going to look at three things. First of all, just some basic facts about Canada that are relevant to my talk, facts about the country and its political system, its civics. Second, I want to take a look at the party system that's developed in Canada from a conventional left/right, or liberal/conservative perspective. The third thing I'm going to do is look at the political system again, because it can't be looked at in this country simply from the conventional perspective.
First, facts about Canada. Canada is a Northern European welfare state in the worst sense of the term, and very proud of it. Canadians make no connection between the fact that they are a Northern European welfare state and the fact that we have very low economic growth, a standard of living substantially lower than yours, a massive brain drain of young professionals to your country, and double the unemployment rate of the United States.
In terms of the unemployed, of which we have over a million-and-a-half, don't feel particularly bad for many of these people. They don't feel bad about it themselves, as long as they're receiving generous social assistance and unemployment insurance.
That is beginning to change. There have been some significant changes in our fiscal policies and our social welfare policies in the last three or four years. But nevertheless, they're still very generous compared to your country.
RockyRacoon
1 year ago
The speech is to long to be posted here but I will send it
to the editor and whoever else's email I can get that might make hay out of this here. I don't remember much being said about it previously but then again, I may not have been payin much attention.
Sincerely,
RR
bicycleboy
1 year ago
Hey tobeornottobe
Your points re: lenient sentencing may be correct on some scores and hard to refute...
but this does not mean it's okay to lie to the public! The Tories have manufactured evidence to support their "crime is on the rise" policy direction. I'm sure it is possible to do something about judicial miscarriages without going after slews of pot smokers and building more prisons in which to transform them into the very hardened criminals we all fear.
kayos
1 year ago
Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?
"More jails aren't going to be much help with recidivism. In fact, more jails will only exacerbate the situation." I agree.
Our society is upside down--the wealthy and powerful few are at the top of the pyramid and the rest, including children and the elderly, are at the bottom. Until we change our priorities, we will never improve our society. Until we take care of children and give them the very best of creative opportunities and until we give prisoners hope and opportunities, we will never improve our society. The 'Harper Government' has it all wrong. First clue? They canceled the National Childcare Program and put the half billion $$ into 'general revenue' (read, as one lady said, 'military spending').
RockyRacoon
1 year ago
We know where the most dangerous offenders are: In the Harper
Gov't that is where and any anyone who travels in their orbit follows. The media is very powerful and a two decades of Gramsci and hegemony and Identity Politics hasn't taught the left anything other than to try to capture some sort of "ideological" plain on which to fight out this battle. To be sure an ideological battle has to take place but that has to come from our experience. We have not experienced labour strife in North America for a very very long time and the notion of just how much power we have and where it comes from has escaped us. We have been to dependent on "left wing" think tanks and NGO's to further our ideals and goals rather than exercise the only real power we do have in bourgeois society-the general strike. That will bring production to it's knee's and the true nature of the state in capitalist society will be exposed faster than you can say "G20" I am begining to believe that an organized vanguard party is not only needed but vital if we are to do away with the limits to human development that are an inherent aspect of capitalist production and reproduction. Capitalism shoots itself in the foot-regardless of what the Banksters on Wall Street or any place else do. When you measure wealth according to the labour time necessary to produce it and are constantly upgrading the system with labour saving technology-you may produce more goods but not more value or wealth. That is the paradox of capitalism-we need to get over it in more ways than one. And that includes getting over our prejudice for failures of past experiments in socialism that had very little in common with the scientific socialism of Marx that many claimed as their progenitor. An open minded read of Trotsky As Alernative by Ernest Mandel may just help many to over come this prejudice. Perhaps a review by a member of the learned staff at the Tyee might do the trick.
MaryLS
1 year ago
Question
"More jails aren't going to be much help with recidivism. In fact, more jails will only exacerbate the situation."
How do more jails exacerbate the situation? How do jails increase incidence of recidivism?
YesItIs2
1 year ago
Tough On Crime if You`re an Ordinary Citizen
I`m wondering when that thief and bribe taker Brian Mulroney is going to be punished. Didn`t he sue the previous government for slander and get millions of dollars, only later to be proven guilty. So when is Harper going to make pay it back...