- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
The Premier's Days Are Numbered
Gordon Campbell is on his way out of office, and likely soon after multiple disasters.
Starting to look like Margaret Thatcher.
"It's a funny old world that here I have won a majority but feel I have to go."
-- British Conservative prime minister Margaret Thatcher, 1990
Will Premier Gordon Campbell suffer the same fate as Margaret Thatcher -- a dominant political leader who was forced out of office by her party despite winning a third majority government?
On Sunday Global TV reported that an emergency caucus meeting has been called this week by BC Liberal MLA and whip John van Dongen, and Public Eye Online has said it will happen Thursday in Vancouver, leadership revolt talk grows stronger daily.
The reasons are plentiful: Campbell's disastrous television address last week defending the Harmonized Sales Tax actually worsened his position according to an Ipsos Reid poll.
It found only 11 per cent of viewers had a better opinion of the premier after seeing it while 43 per cent said their opinion had worsened and 45 per cent said it had no real impact.
Perhaps British Columbians were unimpressed with Campbell's surprise announcement of a 15 per cent income tax cut because B.C. still has a deficit and the premier himself defends the HST because the province needed a one-time $1.6 billion grant from Ottawa due to our poor financial situation.
So where does he suddenly come up with the $600 million a year needed for the income tax cut? And how does it make up for the HST when that tax will take an additional $2 billion a year out of consumers' pockets and give it to big business?
Then there's the sudden guilty plea bargain deal with former BC Liberal aides David Basi and Bob Virk in the BC Rail corruption trial that saw the government pay their $6 million legal fees without any attempt to seize their property or future wages.
That from a government which chases down welfare recipients to the ends of the earth if they fail to declare $100 in earned income.
And a cabinet shuffle that angered at least one minister enough to publicly complain about Campbell's failure to consult his team.
Margaret Thatcher all over again?
It all sounds reminiscent of Thatcher -- the "Iron Lady" of British politics -- who won a decisive election victory in 1987 but by 1990 trailed the opposition Labour Party by 14 per cent, while her personal approval rating of 40 per cent was the second lowest of any post-war prime minister.
Thatcher was challenged by former cabinet minister Michael Heseltine for the Conservative Party leadership, with several polls showing he would regain the lead over Labour as prime minister.
After initially fighting off Heseltine's attack, Thatcher announced she would resign as soon as a new leader was chosen, citing her goal of restoring party unity and improving the prospects of the Conservatives winning the next election.
Campbell won his third term in 2009 with a comfortable majority, but today the BC Liberal Party is behind the opposition New Democrats by between nine per cent and as much as 25 per cent, while the premier's personal approval rating has dropped to just nine per cent compared to 50 per cent in March 2009, before the May election and the surprise introduction of the hated Harmonized Sales Tax in July.
Campbell has been challenged by his former energy minister Blair Lekstrom, who publicly called for the premier to resign after quitting both cabinet and caucus in June over his constituents' opposition to the HST.
"You hope that he knows when the time has come. I think, without question, most people would agree that the time has come to have a new premier," Lekstrom said in September.
Gordon Campbell, meet Margaret Thatcher.
And to make the picture of disharmony in BC Liberal ranks even worse, last week Bill Bennett, Campbell's energy minister, called the Vancouver Sun's Jonathan Fowlie to publicly criticize the premier's cabinet shuffle and reorganization of resource ministries without consulting the BC Liberal caucus.
"We need to think about doing things differently. We are not well thought of by the general public. Wouldn't that suggest to you that perhaps it might be time to try a different approach?" Bennett said in an unprecedented complaint prompted by Campbell removing mining from his portfolio.
"It's the difference between doing things to people and with people, and I personally believe it's just smarter to do things with people," Bennett said, drawing the obvious conclusion that the Kootenay East MLA is smarter than the premier.
Rennie's blast
Then fellow cabinet minister and constant Campbell booster Kevin Krueger struck back in the media at Bennett, calling him "petulant" and "irritating."
"Bill has behaved in a typical Bill way, and I don't think anybody appreciates it, because he's more petulant about -- he wanted more power personally than he has," Kevin Krueger told Kamloops radio station CHNL.
"This is not the first outburst in Bill Bennett, we all know that. It's one the premier has obviously decided he can live with, but it's irritating, because it deflects energy from the things that we're doing together," the social development minister said.
Campbell obviously decided it was better to have Bennett inside the tent than out and quickly announced he would stay as energy minister despite the outburst.
Beyond the friendly confines of the BC Liberal caucus, things aren't any better.
The province's top condominium marketer Bob Rennie, a past supporter of Campbell and his party, blasted the premier once again last week over the HST.
"He's the shittiest salesman in the country," Rennie bluntly told developers at a Kelowna meeting. "He's done a horrible job of selling the public on the HST. We're in shit and he's hurting the economy."
"He needed to say we have some heavy lifting to do. We don't want to be Greece," Rennie said, referring to that country's economic crisis.
All in all, a terrible week for a premier who had hoped to put questions about his continued leadership to an end and turn the page on the HST.
Dragging down the party
Instead Campbell only worsened his position, and now it appears that the BC Liberals' dire predicament may have emboldened at least some MLAs fed up with the premier's prima donna approach to confront him.
The similarities with the imperious Thatcher are again striking.
Former Conservative cabinet minister Sir Norman Fowler said in 1990 that Thatcher had been privately told she was dragging the party down to likely defeat.
"A whole range of cabinet ministers said, 'Look, we don't think you're going to win, and it would be better if you didn't run,'" Fowler said.
Eventually that pressure got to the prime minister -- will a similar message get to Campbell?
One message could come through the results of a BC Liberal membership vote on Campbell's leadership that will be announced at the party's convention in Penticton Nov. 19-20. The less than secret balloting took place earlier across the province but the results won't be released until then.
Should Campbell's numbers be embarrassing low, he could announce his departure as leader at the convention to avoid the results being made public.
But lest the NDP get too cocky about Campbell's dire predicament, they should remember the reaction of then-British Labour Party opposition leader Neil Kinnock to Margaret Thatcher's sudden fall.
News of Thatcher's resignation was "good, very, very good indeed" Kinnock said, calling on the Conservatives to immediately call an election -- one that Labour would have won handily based on polling.
"How can anyone have confidence in a government with cabinet ministers who in the last week have been privately telling the press that the prime minister is finished and then minutes later supporting her position in the television studios or going off to a private meeting in order to contrive the coup against the prime minister?" Kinnock asked at the time.
But Kinnock's dreams of unpacking at Number 10 Downing Street never materialized.
Quit to save the Libs?
Thatcher's resignation paved the way for John Major to defeat Heseltine and other contenders to become prime minister and then lead the party to another majority election victory over Kinnock in 1992.
Will Gordon Campbell read the political history lesson and try to save his party from electoral Armageddon, or will the stubborn premier force rebels to push him from office?
The next few weeks may tell that tale. ![]()




50
Login or register to post comments
Hughes
1 year ago
"Will Gordon Campbell read
"Will Gordon Campbell read the political history lesson and try to save his party from electoral Armageddon?"
This "Liberal" Party's lack of integrity, culture of secrecy and arrogance runs much deeper than Campbell.
HMS Campbell must sink and all the rats must perish before rebuilding and relaunching a new flagship.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
It makes absolutely no
It makes absolutely no difference who happens to be the so called "leader".
Thanks to the deregulated money creation powers given to a special interest class, now ruling the world with the power of imaginary capital, the multinational corporate mafia is in charge of this and all other governments, and they do as they're told.
Campbell was "invited", or rather ordered, to attend the secret meeting of the Bilderbergers, a criminal organization disguised as "prominent business leaders", and got his orders.
Meanwhile the corporate machine is at work behind the scenes to ensure another government by the same gang, or else they'll ruin the economy, as they have started during the last NDP government.
Gordie has a nice string of directorships waiting for him in '13 and whatever happens now is nothing more than a PR circus to lead people down the garden path, believing that they're living in a democracy, where governments govern.
Ed Deak.
Barryeng
1 year ago
Campbell won't resign
I don't think that Campbell will bow to the inevitable and resign. He is so adamant that he is right that only a completely open rebellion amongst the Liberals will have any effect on him.
He deserves, and needs to be gone, but he will have to be thrown out by his party, rather than having him do the right thing and resign "for the good of the party".
Jeffrey J.
1 year ago
What Ed Deak Said
Fiat Lux says it all. We remain transfixed at the rotating personalities that come and go in a highly controlled economic and class system. Once they outlive their usefulness (Brian Mulroney, Bill Bennett, Vander Zalm, Campbell) they are summarily booted out by their corporate masters and replaced with yet another "leader", eager to show the powers that be that they can deliver more profits than the last guy.
As long as we remain fixated on the personality of the leader, the system will never change. Campbell's replacement, whoever he/she is, will not change life for BC's citizens one bit.
sunshine coast girl
1 year ago
Good! Can he go today please?
It wouldn't be a moment too soon.
Camero409
1 year ago
Good! Can they all go today PLEASE!
For this lying, corrupt government it can't happen quick enough. I've had a belly full of their lies, deceit and corruption. They all must be defeated with the recall and the next election. A warning to all you looking for a alternative to the Fiberals/CONServatives. Currently there isn't a true LIbERal/CONServative out there. There is only one true party presently, and it's the NDP. They are the only ones currenly who can right the ship and put us back on course. Any version of the FIBERalS or CONServatives will only lead us down this corrupt path again.
Ed Seedhouse
1 year ago
"I don't think that Campbell
"I don't think that Campbell will bow to the inevitable and resign. He is so adamant that he is right that only a completely open rebellion amongst the Liberals will have any effect on him."
Maybe, but if one or two of the recalls work out in January, you'll see the open rebellion in no uncertain terms. It's barely suppressed now, thus Godon's need to hand out plumb high paying cabinet positions to those most in danger of recall.
jim1966
1 year ago
Campbell Is Too Arrogant To Resign
He is and his recent public address ($240,000.00 was a waste of money BIG TIME!)and the overnight IPSOS Poll clearly indicates that British Columbians either were unimpressed by anything this man has to say or we simply just don't believe anything this man says period. I think that it's the latter that most people feel. The bungling of the BC Liberals has gone one for too long at our expense. The HST issue will be remembered as the nail in the BC Liberal coffin. Too bad, these people have zero sympathy from me as they did 100% of this to themseleves, they lied to the voters, they covered up and hid the truth, our fearless leader was charged with drinking and driving and worst of all is that the BC Liberals are very poor stewards of our economy. They have ignored some of the key issues that face us all everyday, poverty, higher user fees on various services and the Campbell government has created a lot of hostitily with the electorate for being arrogant and uncaring and dishonest. They failed and we need an election, that is the bottom line in BC. I doubt that Campbell would ever conceed to this unless his party demands it at the upcoming BC Liberal convention.
Skywalker
1 year ago
Not so sure he should leave.
I have mixed feelings about Campbell leaving early. Personally it would do my heart good to see his arse kicked by the electorate in an election. I do suspect he will be appointed by some of the very business interest who are now so worried, to a variety of lucrative directorships. So he will get his undeserved reward from them. He is deserving of the same political infamy as Bill Bennett of insider fame. History will not be kind to these crooks when the full scale of their damage to the province is viewed.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
Jim,.....The Liberals and
Jim,.....The Liberals and Campbell didn't fail.
They've followed the instructions they were given by their owners to the letter.
Wealth can not be created, only taken and it was their job to take and give.
The same applies to the Harper gang.
It won't make any difference who the leader will be. The instructions will remain the same, as it is to governments all over the world.
Ed Deak.
Fish-counter
1 year ago
Trouble is; who do we get to hate next?
It must have occurred to many before me, but we do love to hate our political leaders in BC, don't we? Just think of the list of former premiers and you will see what I mean. Campbell is a particularly fine figure to hate, with his drinking and driving, BC Railgate and the complete letting off Basi and Virk, and who knows how many other crooks are hiding under the skirting boards.
On top of his political sleaze, he has a personal sleaze that redefines sleaze. I hope he ends up selling neon signs. That is what he does best.
We sorely need a third party in BC, one that is not tied to the unions nor the business interests of a few millionaire executives.
Anything that keeps Wally Oppal off my TV screen would work. Putting him in charge of an enquiry into wrongdoings that occurred on his watch is incestuous.
lynn
1 year ago
Rotten
Oh, how the BC Liberals would love us to 'Believe' that this is just about Gordo.
It isn't.
They (all the BC Liberal MLA's) voted for his policies and supported them enthusiastically in the legislature and were responsible for passing these regressive policies into laws without uttering one word of dissent.
The only two BC Liberal MLA's who deserve any praise for having the courage of their convictions during the most authoritarian decade in the history of this province are Paul Nettleton and Elayne Brenzinger.
As for the ever-devoted Mr. Lekstrom, before speaking out he waited until his premier had totally dismantled all of our most vital social infrastructure, our public assets and resources....and along with them the democratic process. In the legislature he vigorously defended the selling of BC Rail and all of the other disastrous legislation brought in by the BC Liberals under Gordon Campbell.
While Gordo facilitated the privatization agenda of the corporate crew backing him, his MLA's likewise facilitated and represented that same vile corporatism by naying and braying their total agreement like trained donkeys.
They represented the will of corporations instead of the will of the people.
None of them showed a shard of respect for democracy...
Unless it was out of sheer self-interest and opportunism....as evidenced by the eleventh hour 'conversion' of both Lekstrom and Bennett.
This rotten to the core party arrogantly spit in the eye of democracy over and over again.
This province reeks from the stench of them.
The New Era.
The Golden Decade.
And who could forget....'The Heartlands'?
Ha! and Ha! again.
For all their attempt to control the flow of public information, this government will not escape their vile record - and the word treasonous will be used.
Among other revealing adjectives.
dustytrails
1 year ago
Make it quick and painless
Take a quick boat to retirement Gordon. Don't stray to far because after your BC Liberals are done in office the people of BC will be checking into your past possible criminal actions as premier.
G West
1 year ago
@Bill Tieleman
I think you're misreading this. I hope you (and others) are right and Campbell will be leaving very soon - although I'm inclined to agree with Lynn that the blame should be distributed much more widely.
Still, I don't think this meeting is going to be about Gordo's departure - in fact, I think that, to the contrary, it's going to be a chance for some members of the caucus to remind 'other' members of the caucus than they need to 'man up' and step out in support of the LEADER.
khed67
1 year ago
Campbell = Red Herring
We need more clear thinkers like Ed Deak, Jeffrey J, and Lynn.
If anything, Campbell is helping the BCLiberal/neo-con cause by distracting people from the actual problem.
Skywalker
1 year ago
GWest
If you are right and they attempt to muzzle the rest who see their political careers heading into the toilet, it will have the opposite effect. It is more likely that Campbell will tell them he'll be gone by the next election but that it is in their interests to stand united to save their hides. The problem is that the longer the stay united, they more they are tarred with Campbell's tainted legacy. Couldn't happen to a nicer group of people.
frank2
1 year ago
Hang in there Gordon. You
Hang in there Gordon. You are irreplaceable.
RickW
1 year ago
The "Harper Gang"......
,...has today (02 Nov.) put the kibosh on the Prosperity Mine, IMO a direct blow by the feds on Campbell's leadership of the Liberal Party in BC. Desigantions aside, the BC Libs are a natural ally to the federal Cons - and Harper wants to keep the BC Libs in power here. But Campbell has to go, and the announcement today by the "Environment Minister" Jim Prentice killing the mine, is telling Campbell to leave a ship he is helping to sink.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
Rick....Don't forget that
Rick....Don't forget that both the BCLibs and the Conservatives are the Reform Party under different names...
.....as the BCLibs may come back, once again, under a different name before the next elections. I'm betting on "conservative"
We're talking about big business politics here under the guise of "competitiveness", screwing humanity.
There could be a deal between the two brother governments, behind the scenes, for the Campbell gang to approve the mine, knowing that the Harper gang will shot it down for obvious reasons: there would have to be a military occupation of the site, and the road ,to have it proceed.
This way the Libs can beat their chests, claiming that they've been the good guys, but they were cruelly prevented to provide jobs, jobs, jobs, etc.
As far the feds are concerned, they've had an old Reform fossil by the name of Dick Harris reelected umpteen times around here in 4 union towns and can count on his reelection again, with the exception, perhaps, of the Williams lake area.
When we talk about "intelligence" nothing can be discounted and the OWNERS of the Reform party, not the members, or the leadership, who are only the visible pimps, are professionals with huge benefits at stake.
They can "create" a depression at any time to force people to accept their demands.
Ed Deak, Big Lake.
samuidave (not verified)
1 year ago
Sure we need another party...
if we are looking for another haven for the corporate crooks to hide within. Are we completely unwilling to see how the game is being played against us?
A FEW THINGS WE KNOW:
*we are governed thru corporatism.
*the corporations and big-money interests finance all the contending political parties and thus the legislative consenters to crime.
*40% support (on one day after a issue-bundled, political sales gala is performed for 6 weeks prior) gives effectively authoritarian rule.
*the party forces behind the leader will determine the issues.
*most of the government work is done in complete secrecy.
*our chosen representative will only nod in agreement with the party leader on all issues.
*promises are routinely broken by the party, party leader and the folks on the party team.
*deception and lies are common place within the government.
*if our representative dare speaks out against the party or the leader, s/he will be removed.
*seeking corporate profit, our commons are being exploited more and more with relative impunity.
*the people are doing worse and worse with bailouts, austerity programs and having to absorb the unaccounted costs of resource destruction by the corporations.
*our district interests are not tendered meaningfully by our impotent representatives.
*many former government members go on to high-paying corporate jobs intertwined with their work as our representatives.
*we have only a remote ability to effect recall -- itself fraudulently offered to us as some sort of legitimate 'check and balance' promoting good government.
*no party has ever tried to make representation of the people part of the process, let alone install a peoples' democracy.
*our voices are not heard by power except come election season; even then, they are only heard, never heeded.
*that these parties all run expensive sales campaigns to convince us they will 'do us right' next time.
*propaganda in the corporate media and in the state schools keeps us distracted from the issues and mis-informed about our role, most importantly as voters.
*playing the high-stakes advertising game against the corporations is futile.
*gathering in the streets collectively is dangerous and often deemed criminal.
*IF we can change our thinking collectively and see how things are really governed and for whom, we can operate outside of the power of the state and its money and its strongarm force.
AND WE KNOW we are given a chance each election to vote these parties and their embedded crooks out of power, and to replace them with honest folks not blatantly on the take as a shill carrying a party icon.
Are we incapable of finding 85 honest, accountable and independent folks in our communities to step up, with our encouragement, and stand up for the people against these criminals?
With the perils we face, the time left to peacefully take back our government is running out.
Cool Hand
1 year ago
Ed
Just checked the 2008 poll-by-poll results for Cariboo-Prince George and out of ~247 polling stations, Harris won every poll except for Alkali Lake, Nemaiah Valley, and 3 in PG. He won all of the Williams Lake polls by a mile. Why would that be any different in the next go around?
BTW, Big Lake Ranch went 140 Con, 65 NDP, 16 Lib, and 14 Green.
Union towns in the interior typically vote Con unlike their brethren on the coast, such as Port Alberni and Powell River, that go NDP.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
Cool.....I knew the Dickhead
Cool.....I knew the Dickhead was elected by a large margin in this area. What I meant was that this decision could cut into his majority, albeit, he has it made.
Big Lake is strong Bible belt and always goes where the Lord tells them to go. Which means never for the "Godless socialists".
Ed Deak.
mtn.caribou
1 year ago
Get rid of them Now!
We must boot these monkeys out now....NOW we can't wait another two years. Make it stop before the destruction, gutting and sell off is complete. Greed and power... nothing else motivates this Liberal government.
Those who voted the Fiberals in for the third term, what on earth were you thinking?
mtn.caribou
1 year ago
Get rid of them Now!
We must boot these monkeys out now....NOW we can't wait another two years. Make it stop before the destruction, gutting and sell off is complete. Greed and power... nothing else motivates this Liberal government.
Those who voted the Fiberals in for the third term, what on earth were you thinking?
Fiat lux
1 year ago
mtn.....What motivates this
mtn.....What motivates this government is the theory of neoclassical market economics, taught in our universities as a "science", and used by the corporate mafia to rule and destroy the world in the name of "wealth creation", using the twisted out, 200 year old words on the "invisible hand of self interest" to justify their crimes.
Until this criminal theory is stopped and scrapped, all governments will pay homage to it to enslave their peoples in its service.
We can scream all we want against politicians, it won't make any difference.
Ed Deak.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
...should read "...the 200
...should read "...the 200 year old words of Adam Smith...."
Ed Deak.
x4estworker
1 year ago
NDP Still Has a Lot of Work To Do
Nobody in the NDP should be complacent in thinking that the Liberals are so low in the polls that the next election is a done deal in favor of the NDP. Besides the example mentioned by Bill Tieleman. don't forget that the Social Credit party changed leaders in about 1986 when it was very low in the polls and Bill Bennett had quit. Bill Vanderzalm was elected leader, and even though his term was a disaster, the fact is that the Social Credit party got four more years in office.
The NDP needs to convince the public that it is capable of governing and that it is competent to manage the economy. Mike Harcourt did that and we had 10 years of good NDP government. Carol James has to do that now, and the rest of the MLA's and the party need to get behind her and contribute in a positive way to convincing the public to vote NDP. It is not good enough just as sit back and hope to win by default, because that probably won't happen.
fairweatherfriend
1 year ago
The Liberals future
It is clear the Liberal members have already delivered a resounding "get rid of him" message to the caucus. The caucus meets later this week to deliver that message to Gordon, who probably already knows the results anyway. The caucus, in collaboration with Gordon, will then carefully craft an "elegant" manner in which Gordon will depart in an emotional farewell speech staged at the annual convention, presumably containing elements which will emphasize his "good" works and "integrity". He will then sail off into the sunset to the thunderous applause of all delegates assembled. Shortly thereafter the process to select a new leader will begin, but how the heck will they find anyone willing to step in who is not already deeply despised by the electorate?
Don't even THINK of going there Dianne - you can do much better with your own new party!
whatthe
1 year ago
Press secretary in waiting
Bill,
Your sounding like a press secrtary in waiting bro.
Recently I have been shaking my head reading your stuff.
The Basi Virk piece was so apologist and shallow I am damn sure you are gonna be spinning lines for the gallery anytime.
Now this respinning of the liberal story of how its all Gordo is equally appauling. I know Carole's shop is communication challenged but that leaves a kot of runway for you bro and you regurgitate Liberal talking points?
Bill you and I know this fricking government has undertaken the single most destructive term of Governance the Province has ever seen.
Cleaning up the fricken mess is gonna be a yeomans job even if you spin puff like this from now until 2013.
What the hell happen to you bro?
Remember the good old Clark days? Taking on the banksters and running by the seat of your pants to an electoral victory few thought possible.
You used to mean something man....
Its to weep...
Put down your purse and get out your sword bro, we bot a freaking Proving to pull out of the fire.
Sheesshhhh
Grania
1 year ago
Getting rid of the virus will not clear up the infection
The party is full of self serving, corporate kissing mla s who have no concern for the voters in this province. All of them are responsible for the deceit and the complete waste of our resources and tax dollars. They ALL have to go....
Fiat lux
1 year ago
We can get rid of the
We can get rid of the politicians, at least still and now, but how do we get rid of the multinational corporate mafia, who are giving them their orders, and the professors who are inventing the ideological scriptures justifying enslavement and destruction ?
The politicians are only the pimps for a sick system, collectivizing everything, in the best Soviet fashion, into the hands of a ruling sector.
Ed Deak
G West
1 year ago
Well Bill - credit where credit's due
You were right, I was wrong - the witch is dead.
Now lets move on the rest of the coven.
Jerry Munro
1 year ago
Dealing with the corporate mafia... the main task.
Yes, Campbell is gone.... improving the BC Liberal's chance by just that much. Now, the question is, will the Party be spared, or share in Campbell's crime wave blame?
"We can get rid of the politicians, at least still and now, but how do we get rid of the multinational corporate mafia, who are giving them their orders, and the professors who are inventing the ideological scriptures justifying enslavement and destruction ?" Ed Deak
Which is the very nub of it for sure, Ed. The politicians are there but as the "frontmen", to take the blame, come and go as the "dispensible" parts of the system that help ever keep the corporate/capitalist beating heart of it untouched and alive, hopefully, forever.
The only way to get at the corporate mafia itself is through a system of "democratic" control of the economy, by workers/through their unions etc and "community", or "the public interest including consumer, environmental reps etc. And to get to that, there is going to have to be first, a renewal of trade union leadership and ideas, their alliance with "community" interest groups such as environmentalists etc, a political front to change laws and the overall legal environment. And to get to that, there needs to be a massive/powerful working class/professional and broader citizens movement built a) to demand it, and create the mass that can push it through over ruling class opposition and (b) defend it if challenged by ruling class controlled forces.
Not really complex, but indeed heart in throat calling for courage, will and determination... and organization.
Frank
1 year ago
Coyote
And this is all going to come to pass through the efforts of people that don't show up at elections?
The people in this new dynamic movement are going to come from the lazy and apathetic?
I'm willing to go on record and say it'll never happen because when the rubber hits the road the members of your new movement won't show up.
DirtyfaceDan
1 year ago
Gordo is gone!
Good call bill. Just goes to show how credible you are, and how much you ARE paying attention. Perhaps more that Campbell! To bad the damage is already done.
Jerry Munro
1 year ago
The Progressive and Left Vote...
"I'm willing to go on record and say it'll never happen because when the rubber hits the road the members of your new movement won't show up." Frank.
Well, there's no "movement" as yet, that I'm aware of. So one "prediction" is probably as good as another, at this point.
That said, it's clear by now... What?... Seventy odd years since the end of the Great Depression, and more than that of NDP/CCF history, plus the collapse and gutting of the old Social Democratic State of the postwar. ...that "the system" and its content are sure as hell not going to be changed through the party system to capitalism, wherein ALL the parties without exception are critically agreed on the desirability of the endless growth, greed driven economic order.
So, even allowing for where you and your Party are coming from Frank, we could swing a bag of horse poop in a sack over our heads, and more likely significantly change the social order than you guys and gals. Relying on you guys has proved like waiting for the Second Coming of The Lord. (Yes, and I know. Many good folks are still waiting for Jesus too. And I hope they're right as well, like I hope the NDP will transform itself.) Sorry, but I've lost the "faith".
You prove me wrong Frank, and I'll be the first one on bent knee before you. The very least you guys might benefit from is... some competition for vision, and from your seriously Progressive and Left. Hopefully, we can do you the favour. :-)
Your assumptions of "right" to the progressive and left vote needs to be challenged. Whether it will be or not, we shall see. At this moment, I'm still a movement of one. :-) lol
Jerry Munro
1 year ago
More On The Progressive and Left Vote...
Frank,
Though it does sound, from some of the chatter here, like maybe there is some "agitation" and "thinking about it" going on... doesn't it? :-)
Frank
1 year ago
coyote
Actually I think waving a bag of horse poop over our heads would be less effective than supporting the NDP.
The thing is, it doesn't matter because what I want out of the NDP may not be the same as what you want. You're demanding systemic change and are thus rightly disgusted with the lack of progress on that front coming from the Dippers. Fair enough, but that also means you're not the NDP's target audience since they're not trying to bring on massive social upheaval. They're just trying to make the system fairer and more compassionate.
And on that front I would have to say they've been very successful when they're in power and even somewhat successful when they're not. Canada is not governed the way I want but its better than what we'd have if the CCF/NDP was never formed.
Pensions, unemployment insurance, healthcare, welfare, special education teachers, environmental safeguards, minimum wages, labour safety standards and so on wouldn't exist without people like J.S. Woodsworth and Tommy Douglas and numerous others criticizing the system and threatening the powers that be with the possibility of a left-wing government.
As for proving you wrong, that's not my intent nor my goal. Because the goalposts are your own creation, only you can decide what's important for you and if the NDP isn't then far be it from me to try and convince you otherwise.
For myself I used to be disappointed when I saw low electoral turnouts because I thought there might be opportunity for Dipper growth there that wasn't being realized, but over time I realized that for the most part those aren't people the NDP lost, they wouldn't vote NDP even if they were forced to vote.
x4estworker
1 year ago
Those Who Adapt Survive, Those That Don't Perish
It is an absolute truth that those organisms and animals that can adapt to their environment will survive, and those that fail to adapt will perish. So it is with any social movement that is based on changing the capitalist system to some form of socialism or something. It ain't gonna happen. Try that platform with real candidates in a real election and you will get about as far as the perennial Marxist-Leninist candidates. Strike a blow for the underdog and collect 100 or so votes.
The NDP needs to adopt a platform that will win elections. provide good government and implement its agenda incrementally and moderately. The reason the Barrett government blew it in 1975 was it tried to do too much, too fast and it made a lot of people nervous by drifting too far left in some areas. Mike Harcourt did a lot of good things and ran more the style of government that Carol James needs to adopt.
samuidave (not verified)
1 year ago
Yes, Frank, we just need tweak here and there
Fair enough, but that also means you're not the NDP's target audience since they're not trying to bring on massive social upheaval. They're just trying to make the system fairer and more compassionate.
I presumed I wasn't its target audience, being a progressive constituent in Carol James' electoral district and not having four of my emails answered, three unacknowledged. But I digress.
It is nice to have a party insider, of sorts, state up front that the NDP is in it to gain power and not to represent all the people of BC as well as it possibly can.
Frank
1 year ago
samuidave
That's true, the NDP is not trying to represent the cranks and the wild-eyed that want massive social and economic upheaval.
There are lots of other parties available as well as independent candidates that would be open to gaining support from any corner.
samuidave (not verified)
1 year ago
The irony, Frank, ...
is that you sound like you are boasting about "the NDP not trying to represent those that want massive social and economic upheaval", yet social and economic upheaval is what is desperately needed.
We need to get away from globalization; from having selective items valued with other important and valuable human assets ignored; and from the plundering of resources by unaccountable corporations for profit at the expense of the vast majority of people.
We need leadership. We need government to openly acknowledge the real and perilous problems we face not only as British Columbians but as global citizens. We need a vanguard for a prosperous and enduring future, not merely a guard of the old entrenched ways.
Real change IS noticeable. We desperately need REAL change.
Frank
1 year ago
samuidave
If that's true then you will have no problem selling that to the public and you will be premier in 2013.
Where I see a problem is that most people don't give any indication they want massive social and economic upheaval.
If there was such a group and they were rising fast in support everyone would sit up and take notice, but there isn't.
The NDP deals with the world as it is, when formulating policy what's acceptable to the public is very important.
samuidave (not verified)
1 year ago
I hear what you are saying, Frank, ...
and in the short-term pragmatic sense, it makes sense. Sort of the same short-term pragmatic sense discounting the future makes in economic theory designed by the elite; or the short-term pragmatic sense it makes for a political party to screw the people right after the election, and then flower them with bribes as the next election season dawns.
It is a Catch-22, but at the end of the day the state is largely to blame. Consider, in theory, that the state is to take its direction from the people (what you say the NDP is attempting to do). Now consider the incompleteness of information the people are provided by state propaganda, state secrecy, the state schools, the corporate media and corporate advertising. How can the people possibly be in a position to give an informed opinion on what they want?
It is underhanded for a political party or government to say they are going to lead by following the people's wishes knowing those wishes have been manufactured by the state operated from behind by the elite.
And knowing the NDP has had custodianship of the provincial government for 11 of the last 35 years(?), and knowing it never once tried to make the system more represent a people's democracy -- something indubitably in the interests of the vast majority of people -- there is no reason to believe it is going to act favourably in the future.
People are not taking notice, I suggest, simply because the world is very distracting and time consuming; people are bombarded with false messages and misinformation by the state and corporations to appease their vested interests; and it takes a fair amount of time to firmly grasp, let alone comprehend, the vastness of the political-corporate power structure as it has developed over history.
How many people appreciate what was a given 'truth' just 30 years ago may today be an established 'falsehood'? This is why we need true leadership from numerous people, not just a single party with a corporate-dubbed voice. This is why we need independent people with integrity and understanding and a sense of historical context and a broad range of experiences, etc to forge the path ahead.
What we do not need is someone following the lost herd. We do not need to live in a land where the 'one-eyed woman is queen'.
Frank
1 year ago
samuidave
"It is a Catch-22, but at the end of the day the state is largely to blame"
I think the people are to blame. I think people prefer not to think about things that are outside their comfort zone. They willingly remain ignorant. Wrap themselves in an ideological blanket that gets reinforced every time they listen to Bill Good or read the latest rant from Fazil Mihlar.
I've started to argue with people on the Province website and the degree of ignorance there is frankly quite stunning.
Rather than base what they believe on numbers, statistics and verifiable facts they instead spout nonsense a first year Poli-Sci major would be embarrassed to utter in public. But shielding themselves from facts allows them to believe in a make-believe world.
Unfortunately the NDP, being a real-world party and not a platform dreamed up at 3am in someone's kitchen, has to take that ignorance into account when formulating a platform.
I didn't say the NDP had to be led by the beliefs of the ignorant, I'm only saying they have to be accounted for because their vote counts just as much as anyone else's.
samuidave said : "People are not taking notice, I suggest, simply because the world is very distracting and time consuming; people are bombarded with false messages and misinformation by the state and corporations to appease their vested interests"
I agree. Recently the Vancouver Sun and Province and other media have been available for sale. I was hoping to see someone like a union pension fund purchase them and stop allowing members of the Fraser Institute to continue to feed people an ideology that isn't based on real world data. If our population got its facts from a place like the Tyee instead of from its current sources I think it would gradually make a difference in how people think about the world and its problems and possible solutions.
The NDP is not an opinion leader, its simply a political vehicle for people who are already in the same political space. The NDP can only change society incrementally. The ideology has to change if we are to move faster and that will require greater access to the source of people opinions.
John Greg
1 year ago
Frank
Jeebles, crystals, wouldn't that be good! Man, what a lovely dream. To have a piece of the mainstream press actually print a semblance of truth for once ... oh, how lovely that would be.
G West
1 year ago
How do YOU measure achievement?
BC was the only province that did not cut health care funding in 1990s; best screening mammography program in Canada; best cancer recovery rate; the most comprehensive health coverage of any province and one of the most extensive Pharmacare programs in Canada.
First jurisdiction in North America to reach UN goal of 12% protected parks and wilderness; the province created 345 new protected areas and park additions; there was an extensive program to reforest - 2.5 billion trees planted in ten years
Moratorium on grizzly bear hunting and created the Khutzeymateen grizzly bear sanctuary. Toughest forest practices rules in North America.
New laws to protect fish-bearing streams and urban salmon habitat program restored salmon runs; the chlorine discharge from pulp mills was reduced by 80%
The province built 2,500 km of recreational forest trails; 10,000 km of logging roads returned to a natural state.
In advanced education the province went from second worst to second best in Canada.
Tuition fees cut by 5% in 2001, after a five-year freeze - such that BC's tuition fees by 2001 were 44% lower than Alberta, 46% lower than Ontario
New universities (Northern BC, Royal Roads, Tech BC) and 40,000 new post-secondary student spaces since 1992 - BC then boasted the most comprehensive student assistance programs in Canada
During the NDP years we also saw five community colleges designated as University Colleges and the participation rate in post secondary education improved from second worst in Canada in 1991 to second in 2001 – (only Quebec was ahead of us then)
Unlike Campbell, the NDP really DID something about primary and secondary schooling: lowered class sizes in Grades 1-3 and worked to improve reading and writing skills; during the decade, a new school was built every 19 days - creating 136,000 new spaces and 5,423 classrooms since 1991
BC was the only province in the nation that did not reduce education funding in 1990s - 4,000 additional teachers were hired since 1991; 658 portables were eliminated; a school lunch program was started to help kids in need and a heritage language program began in 150 schools which offered 26 languages including Chinese, Punjabi and aboriginal languages
It wasn't Gordon Campbell who started the before and after school care program it was the NDP...
During the NDP years the province achieved the lowest child poverty rate in Canada after PEI - Even the Vancouver Sun acknowledged that BC child care was ranked best in Canada (Vancouver Sun, Sept.26, 2000).
During a time when the resource economy had the Asian flu we eliminated provincial income tax for 100,000 low-income British Columbians and we were one of only two provinces that continued to build social housing during those years.
G West
1 year ago
And, a little more
Human rights legislation nd private sector pension benefits were extended to common-law and same sex spouses; the government passed a
pay equity law to end wage discrimination against women; the province set up new and improved occupational health and safety standards including an anti-scab law to protect workers' rights; changes to the Labour Code reduced days lost to strikes/lockouts and ensured fair union certification process.
Nisga'a Treaty the first modern treaty in BC.
Please note I haven't even mentioned the well-known achievements of the Barrett years.
The pretense that the NDP record is somehow 'inferior' to that of Campbell is just plain nonsense.
Frank
1 year ago
GWest
What a great post!
samuidave (not verified)
1 year ago
An article on US electoral impotence I just read says...
"...On top of all the other factors that have made American elections meaningless, voters cannot even get correct information from the media about the problems that they and the country face..."
Knowing Canada is in hot pursuit of American ideals and politically behaves much like a shadow, we should try to stem the decline before it is wholly beyond our control.
Paul Craig Roberts LINK