Opinion

The Premier's Tacky Wager

This loser of a casino plan proves we missed a jackpot with Jack Poole's 1994 pitch.

By Charles Campbell, 31 Mar 2010, TheTyee.ca

CirqueduSoleil

We could have had a Monaco-like permanent home for Cirque du Soleil.

Related

Gambling brings out the worst in us. It makes us grasp, and it makes us lie. Sometimes we just make stuff up to suit the moment. Take Gordon Campbell for example. In the 1990s he bet that opposing expanded gambling would help the BC Liberals defeat the morally bankrupt NDP, who wanted to pad their coffers at the expense of the poor, the habitual, and the marshmallow-headed. Now he's betting the public will buy the line that moving Vancouver's Edgewater Casino across a street, tarting it up, and tripling its size is not expanded gambling. Perhaps he thinks that, in our post-Olympics euphoria, the overwhelming excitement of funding a $500 million new roof on BC Place through gambling revenue will cause us to overlook the stratospheric level of his hypocrisy.

One could argue that the hypocrisy of Minister of Tourism, Culture and the Arts Kevin Krueger is even worse. After all, it was Krueger who said in 1997 that "Women in British Columbia will die because of gambling expansion. . . Children may die because of gambling expansion, and their blood will be on the heads of the government that expanded gambling and of the MLAs who voted for it."

Now, in what could be construed as a bizarre reversal of that rhetorical excess, Gordon Campbell has explicitly tied gambling revenue to health-care funding. Is he saying that the government must expand gambling or sick people will die?

Two ways to play

At least Rich Coleman, the minister of housing and social development who last year conspired with his boss to breach the government's commitment to funnel gambling revenue to arts, sports and community groups, once had the courage to say something honest about gambling expansion. Coleman argued that B.C. must ensure the money people lose while gambling stays in B.C. and doesn't go to some faraway government, or Washington State native band, or shadowy internet gambling magnate based for reasons of beneficial taxation in the great business centre of Bermuda.

Those are the horns of the gambling dilemma: do we give away the astonishing sums of money wagered and lost to strangers in faraway places, or do we find tolerable ways to keep it at home, and maybe even bring some money here from elsewhere? Because anyone can take their vacation pay to Las Vegas. Any Vancouver halfwit can take the Canada Line to the River Rock in Richmond, or the Millennium Line to the Boulevard Casino in Burnaby. And any night janitor can sit down at a computer in their squalid basement suite, after the kids have gone to bed, and pretend they're one of the happy, shiny people at partypoker.com.

Gambling firewalls can be miles long, but they are all about two feet high. Which is why opponents of gambling expansion, the ones who want to build walls to prevent its growth in the heart of Vancouver, appear almost as silly as the proponents. Sure, they don't lie nearly as much -- and they deserve real credit for that -- but they still delude themselves.

The question we face is a simple one: how to manage gambling so that we minimize the damage and maximize the benefit? Like drugs or prostitution, gambling is something we'd be better off without, but it's not going away no matter what we do.

Emulate Monaco, siphon the rich

We can begin by asking what we want from gambling, which as we have it now in B.C. is largely a tax on the poor and the stupid. I say we want to encourage it among the reasonably well off -- with a special emphasis on real-estate speculators and penny-stock promoters. And we want to encourage it among tourists. Let's, as much as is possible, export our social problems to the families of cruise-obsessed, weak-willed, male-model dentists from suburban Milwaukee.

Will the plan that Gordon Campbell now advocates accomplish this? No, I'm afraid the target market of this new cash grab consists mainly of over-served BC Lions fans and Home Show looky-loos. This current proposal is relentlessly middle-brow, with plenty of room around the edges for the masochistic poor who are trying to overcome a decades-long 6/49 losing streak.

This brings us to another example of Gordon Campbell's hypocrisy. Today, he says, we should accept a huge new gambling facility in Vancouver because "we have a better quality of casino." Well, actually, no. At least not better than we might have had, as Campbell should well understand, because the casino proposal for downtown Vancouver that most resembles the current plan was championed back in 1994 by his pal, the late Jack Poole, when he was chairman of VLC Properties Inc.

What we could have had

You may have some vague memory of the plan: a convention centre, cruise-ship terminal, luxury hotel and (often overlooked) permanent stage for Cirque du Soleil. The proceeds would have helped to fund both the tourism infrastructure and the Woodward's redevelopment. The plan died, however, at the hands of NDP ambivalence, BC Liberal fear-mongering, staunch bipartisan opposition at Vancouver city council, and two-to-one public opposition to expanded gambling.

It didn't help much that the project was personified by Bellagio creator Steve Wynn, who was set to execute the concept and run the hotel, theatre, and gambling tables. The Las Vegas showman made an easy target, and not without reason. Just as Donald Trump exemplifies wretched excess in New York, Wynn exemplifies it in Las Vegas. As a recent and unexpected visit to his Wynn hotel in Las Vegas taught me, he can pull money out of your nose when you're not even looking.

But here's the rub. Wynn builds casinos for rich people. This is no unimportant detail, because gambling is a highly socially stratified activity. The working-class gamble at the Golden Nugget on Freemont Street, and casinos like Circus Circus at the north end of the strip. Middle-class boomers go to the Hard Rock and New York, New York. Rich people (and those with the pretension to taste their extravagant trinkets) go to the Bellagio, the Wynn, and Caesar's Palace (where in 2007 Omaha businessman Terrence Watanabe lost an astonishing $127 million).

Downscale gambling

The Wynn/Poole casino would have sucked a lot of money out of cruise passengers and conventioneers, who are all here on their way to somewhere else. A permanent Cirque du Soleil stage would have been a huge boost to the local economy and to our city's creative life. And the atmosphere in a high-end gambling hall would likely have made the people of modest means most easily damaged by gambling excesses more than a little uncomfortable.

In B.C., however, we've opposed such showpiece casinos while we target the poor and those within easy shooting distance of poor. We squeeze Lotto Max and SportsAction so hard we could get blood from a stone, and we build all our casinos at the low end of middle-brow. The casino complex now proposed next to BC Place is no different, no matter how much lipstick is applied. It would be by middle-brow developer Concert Properties, and operated by the Vegas-based Paragon Gaming, whose local Edgewater Casino is distinguished mainly by its Holiday Inn appointments and mediocre food, and whose other casinos are based in Whitecourt and Enoch, Alberta.

We're told that this new downtown casino would rival Richmond's River Rock, an architectural catastrophe that at least provides a refuge for Beach Boys acolytes with disturbing facial hair. I have a friend who was a River Rock insider during its sausage-like creation. What does he say about the prospect of Vancouver proper snagging an institution of such stature? "Oh boy."

Tackiest place in the world

Many observers seem to think the current proposal is fait accompli. Public opposition to gambling appears to have softened. And because the proposed site is provincial land, the project Vancouver's Vision city council is ill-positioned to oppose it. Some of its members are already gambling-tolerant. In fact, their support for the introduction of slots to Hastings Park, back when Vision councillors cohabited with anti-gambling hardliners in COPE, contributed to their split with that party.

What's more, Gordon Campbell certainly knows how to jam things, and Mayor Gregor Robertson doesn't appear to have much of an appetite for brinksmanship with the province. Chief Vancouver planner Brent Toderian is already dissecting the finer points of building design. And the board of union-owned Concert Properties, formerly Jack Poole's VLC Properties, is dominated by union reps that allow it to work both sides of the political divide, which on the gambling issue is hard to read in any event.

I know I'd put my money down on this one. Vancouver is going to limp, brimming with denial and self-loathing, into a future defined by middle-brow mediocrity. We could have emulated Monaco, and instead we're emulating Reno. Goodbye, Steve Wynn. Farewell, Cirque du Soleil. Hello semi-outdoor rooftop theatre featuring the ghosts of Gerry and the Pacemakers.  [Tyee]

31  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • miguel

    2 years ago

    Yeccch

    Oh dear! This means Celine Dion will be taking up permanent residence here.

  • dorothy

    2 years ago

    Instead of ranting

    Maybe try to think of alternative places for 'the poor' to go. Is it time, perhaps, to get the Church of All Worlds really up and running in our fair city? gathering riches in Heaven rather than on Earth? If they have fifty cents to spare, a collection plate may be a surer bet than the green tables...

  • Grania

    2 years ago

    Sociopaths

    This entire government is made up of seriously sociopathic men and women. All we can do is RECALL!

  • mary jane

    2 years ago

    tacky

    Everything about the lieberals is tacky.
    We can only hope those who live in an area where the MLA is fiberal they go their office and tell him or her they will be removed asap because they are not doing the job they were elected for - protecting the voters

  • Chris Keam

    2 years ago

    great article

    Loved the article Charles! Just tart enough to make it a tasty read.

    I've been saying Vancouver is aiming to be Monte Carlo West. We already have the requisite number of yachts in the harbour. Now all we need is the return of a certain car race and some royalty to complete the picture. But I guess you are right, we'd rather be Reno-esque that Rainier-lite.

  • Peter Dimitrov

    2 years ago

    Gambling expansion- and neoliberal capitalism

    and let us not forget how Vision supported gambling expansion at Hastings Park - which was contra the community plan.

    We need progressive taxation...not gambling expansion. ...we need sectoral and spatial economic planning...not leave it up to the (un) hidden and much subsidized hand of the 'free' market. We need an end to privatization of crown assets and a political party and leaders with the guts to say neo-liberal capitalistic economic policies is disaster capitalism in BC. Do we have that in CJ, GC or JS, not by a long shot, and only in my nightmares do I envision a future Premier - whose former job title of former a Vancouver mayor, IMHO.

  • snert

    2 years ago

    I think......

    Gordo's just trading one addiction for another.

  • ReeferMadness

    2 years ago

    Excellent analysis

    Like other "vices", gambling is something that needs to be regulated, not eliminated. The author's point that we should be targeting facilities to get money from people who have it, not the poor, is right on the money (pun unintended).

  • rachelle

    2 years ago

    SUBJECT TO THE POOR

    I FIND IT VERY SAD THAT WE AS BC IS THE CITY THAT HAS MORE YET IGNORED THE POOR,,EVEN WELFARE, DISABILITY IS THE LOWESS ACROSS CANADA WHY CAN YOU NOT FOLLOW YOUR CANADA COUNTRY,,AND GIVE THE BENEFIT THAT IS NEEDED TO SURVIVE IN YOUR CITY,SORRY TO SAY BUT IT SEEM THE MARE HEAR DOES NOT CARE TO FOLLOW HIS OWN COUNTRY CANADA,,GIVE MORE TO THE POOR TO SURVIVE,,OR TRY LIVING OFF THE WELFARE AND DISABILITY SALARY YOUR SELF

  • G West

    2 years ago

    Decent piece...except for one thing...

    The Las Vegas dream, and the Atlantic City one too, have turned sour.

    If you haven't been down there for a couple of years you might not realize exactly how bad things are in those parts of Nevada and New Jersey where the dream of a never-ending supply of easy cash was going to wash into town every few days.

    It's dry as a bone there these days....and no signs of recovery. The market and the cost of oil may still be rising - but this is a jobless recovery and people are hanging on to their loose change - except of course those who are down to their last few dimes and think plunking them into a slot machine is a 'good' idea.

    If you want money from people who have more cash than they need and haven't been paying their way, then change the tax structure - don't play silly games with roulette wheels.

    Otherwise, you're going to end up sounding as clueless as Kevin Kreuger did earlier this week on AM 690 and Gordon Campbell did when he called this scam a 'cultural and entertainment' centre.

  • lynn

    2 years ago

    You bet your life.....

    Attempting to address social justice and infrastructure funding through the expansion of gambling is based on the same erroneous assumption that dieting is an "effective" way of losing and maintaining weight loss. It may work for the short term...but for the long term too many unintended consequences come into play.

    Inevitably, the quality of one's life choices must be addressed.

    As Louise Arbour once noted: "Violations of civil and political rights are intrinsically linked to violations of economic, social and cultural rights, whether they are causes or consequences of the latter."

    Consequently, it is more than just changing our economic system, as our systems - be they political, social, justice or economic - are all intrinsically inter-connected.

    (This is quite evident in the present protest against the HST that has become almost solely focused on the economics of this tax. It is delusional to think the HST is merely an economic issue. It isn't.

    It's sneaky appearance in BC is directly related to the extensive loss of human and civil rights that have occurred under the "reign" of our present "government". The sad truth is - we have little or no say, at present, in the evolution of social or economic justice within our own country, within our own province and within our own communities.)

    We should be asking ourselves: How, have we, as a province and a people, landed ourselves in such a treacherous position that we now have to gamble with our right as citizens to effective infrastructure?

    Most of us would probably agree that gambling has always been a short "fix" of distraction from reality. Surely our social system has to based on something more thoughtfully substantial and "real" than mere whim? Surely we deserve better than to be made into co-dependents victims of a roll of the dice?

    (Really enjoyed reading this article though - it was clever and sardonic and funny in all the right places..... just disagree with Charles Campbell's conclusion.)

  • morechatter

    2 years ago

    BC's Tacky Premier

    How sweet it is just what BC needed as living in BC is a gamble as many try to hang onto their homes and jobs as it is hard to say what is in store for residents. A job at the casino maybe but somehow I don't think many will find much reassurance there but may want to bet their last unemployment cheque to see if they can come up with the mortgage payment?

  • morechatter

    2 years ago

    Kleenex anyone?

    The poor, the poor are being left without enough to survive but no one listened as the poor are forced to live in inhuman conditions as it only gets worst. And now its the middle class home owner that is going to be crying about how poor they are once those interest rates continue to rise along with the rates on borrowed money. That is what I predict is in store for many British Colombians, a whole lot of tears but no one will be listening. I figure by July there will be no hiding the predicament British Columbians have gotten themselves into by electing the cities drunk.

  • Fish-counter

    2 years ago

    I don't want to be rude to honest second-hand car salesmen but..

    ...every member of the Liberal cabinet looks like a sleazy second-hand car salesman. Same slick hair-do, same slick glasses and shiny suits. They even have the same "it's my boss's birthday so I can offer you a really great deal" approach.

    We need a poster with all the provincial premiers and the federal prime minister's faces on it with the caption, "These men are addicted to gambling".

    Gambling is no way to pay for government programs. It does not create wealth, it merely redistributes it from the poor to the wealthy casino operators.

    Let us parrot the Liberal's own words by saying that:

    "FIRST NATIONS CHILDREN MAY DIE TONIGHT BECAUSE THE LIBERAL POLITICIANS ARE ADDICTED TO GAMBLING. THEY MIGHT JUST AS WELL PUT A GUN TO THE KID'S HEADS AND BLOW THEIR BRAINS OUT BECAUSE THEIR PARENTS ARE SPENDING GROCERY MONEY AT THE CASINO"

    So really, using the Liberal's own logic, they are all ACCESSORIES TO MURDER and should be thrown in jail. Further, because gambling revenue is so racially biased, the Liberals are actually COMMITTING GENOCIDE. That puts them on the same plane as Slobodan Milosovich and they belong in The Hague, facing WAR CRIMES CHARGES.

    Yes, I know I am exaggerating, and I apologise to every honest, hard-working second-hand car salesman everywhere. They don't deserve to be compared to a Liberal politician. It is an insult to the salesman.

  • frank2

    2 years ago

    Would be nice if gambling

    Would be nice if gambling advertising could he heavily regulated and reduced. Treat it like tobacco and alcohol.

  • RickW

    2 years ago

    ICBC chair connected to casino developer

    http://www.publiceyeonline.com/archives/004852.html

  • Terrys_Hot

    2 years ago

    It is time

    Back in the days where we stood up too the government instead of hiding our heads in shame we would be waiting it out for the Hated Sales Tax and then call a general strike say for a couple of days or even a week but now that we are taxed upon taxes what do we do take it lying down. For example in 1995 the forestry didn't like the core report so there were some 20,000 objecters on the Britsh Columbia Legislatures lawn for a one day walk out do you remember that Will. Well it is time we had one of those for the Liberals and the swelled head of their leader the Great Gordo

  • lynn

    2 years ago

    RickW

    Thanks for posting that most interesting link.

  • dave49

    2 years ago

    Gambling is...

    Gambling is basically voluntary taxation. Slot machines are B-O-R-I-N-G.

    We have enough casinos already. We do not need another one, ugly or otherwise.

  • Headshakin

    2 years ago

    Deja Voo Doo

    I was around and involved during the last attempt to foist a casino project on the Downtown Eastside. What disturbed me most at the time, which continues to this day, was the new involvement of local and provincial big union pension funds in property development, and how it would change them and the politics of this province. When you have the BC Fed and VDLC becoming what they once considered "the enemy" who then is left to fight for social justice? Agencies and residents of the adjacent neighbourhood were told that it was a city wide facility and not a local issue and that they had no input in the process. Glen Clark rammed a doomed bank project (Four Corners Bank) down the throats of the neighbourhood who just wanted their own credit union, so that the NDP and the unions could control the project's financing, all at a loss of millions of dollars (remember Jim Green's famous quote? "I don't know why they picked me to run it, I can't even balance my own bank book."). Ken Georgetti was on the phone pimping the project and offering the possibility of sweetheart deals to local agencies in exchange for their silence. Many agencies accepted similar overtures and have reaped the benefits of that benevolence to this day. That gambling/development project certainly brought out the finest qualities in all concerned. Not long afterward the NDP veered to the right and started kicking the poor to impress the right wing and the same players layer became complicit in shifting Vancouver politics to the right when COPE wouldn't sell out and then became ardent promoters of the Olympics project. Fast forward to the latest mega-stupidity that no one is asking for or needs, only this time they're all in bed with Gordon Campbell and the Liberals. I thought my disillusionment had peaked during the NDP years but it seems there are never ending new wonders to be revealed.

  • G West

    2 years ago

    Headshakin

    I've got some real problems with Ken Georgetti and his union buddies too - particularly the way union pension funds are being used to support developers...I think the NDP has severed most of those ties and it needs to get busy and clip the rest of them.

    However, that being said, compared with the corporate contro of CEO government under Campbell that situation is pretty benign....well, perhaps not benign...maybe the 'lesser' of two evils.

    In the end there should be no direct union or corporate ties to government.

  • Luck

    2 years ago

    Gambling in BC

    I remember when Mr. Winn and crew came up from Las Vegas to attempt to sell BC on a vision of gambling in BC. Everyone was appaarently against it as it did not fly.

    Instead the convention centre was built instead as it was going to be the revenue builder for BC and it took money from the rich not the poor.

    I remember how all governments in canada were dead against gambling as it was evil.

    My how the times change in a few short years. New shit same faces. Politicians are all white caller criminal bandits with a licence to steel.

    Now the governments in canada can't build enough casinos as it pays for healthcare, run provinces. pay more money to mla's, 2010 parties and on and on. Now take money from poor to fund rich playgrounds.

    The government in BC has more money than it ever has and is broke as it is all spent on 2010 winter party for the rich and famous. We will be in debt until 2020.

    So raise HST, raise BC Ferries, raise Hydro, raise natural gas prices, raise gasoline tax, raise property tax, raise car insurance, raise fuel prices, raise mortgage prices, raise property prices. No matter how much monet liberal gov get we still broke province.

    Once evrything raised up we have another recession, work layoffs and world dowturn predicted acccording to RBC who made a 2000% profit in first 1/4 of 2010.

    Maybe people of BC get into banking business. Open own Canadian bank with 5 million BC members. Guaranteed to make lots of $$$$. Banks pay no taxes. Bonus.

    Hopefully second coming of JC is in 2012 as predicted. Amen.

  • crankypants

    2 years ago

    This whole thing stinks

    This whole BC Place retractable roof expenditure makes no sense. Winnipeg announced yesterday that they are going to build a brand new stadium for $115 million. It will seat 30,000+ attendees and be expandable to 40,000 for the Grey Cup. 80% of of the seating will be under cover.

    Meanwhile we are going to spend 5 times that for one stinking roof. I'd love to see the business case for this expenditure.

    Also there is some very interesting information about Paragon Gaming which will be building the casino complex. A fellow named T. Richard Turner became a director of Paragon Gaming in Sept 2006. He is a chair of ICBC and was a chair of the BC Lottery Corp. until Dec 2005. He has made personal donations to the BC Liberal party of $17,600 from 2005 to today. Two companies he is either owner of or involved with, TitanStar Capital and TitanStar Holdings have donated $52,400 to the BC Liberal party, the last $50,000 having been made on May 12,2009. He also had discussions with Kevin Krueger last year about the type of roof that should be installed on BC Place. He told Krueger that a retractable roof would be looked upon as the best option to secure Paragon as the builder of the new casino. All this information came courtesy of Publiceyeonline.

    What's wrong with this picture?

  • offended

    2 years ago

    G West: My union pension plan

    helps pay for development (Concert Properties). Without the cash from the pension plans, the money would have to come strictly from big business. And if big business didn't do it, then where would the money come from? Big banks? Financial institutions?
    Some people don't think before they post.

    I want to know why the chair of ICBC was lobbying for Paragon (the developer for the new casino). This was reported in the Vancouver Sun today, of all places.

    Now there's some shady dealing.

  • crankypants

    2 years ago

    offended

    The chair of ICBC, T. Richard Turner, was lobbying for Paragon because he sits on one of their Canadian boards and has a stake in their company.

    Read my other posting just above yours.

  • Luck

    2 years ago

    Premier Tacky Wager on our dole

    People of BC please quit complaining and do something.

    Lets get impeachment laws. It works with our cousins country in USA, it'll work here.

    Why must we be so tolerable towards mla crimes against humanity.

    Clint Eastwood said first you got to get angry about someone doing you harm, then you got to get mean, real mean and fix it.

    Lets get Clint the cigar smoking and gun slinging sheriff on our side.

    Heck we make a movie out of it, call the movie Cleaning Up BC the Wild West Way. Everyone would want to see it around the world, returns will help pay for healthcare and pay down our multi-billion dollar debt we have in BC.

    So lets start thinking about solutions, real solutions and not words.

  • zalm

    2 years ago

    Tar? Feathers?

    That's my impeachment law. If the situation ever gets bad enough here, you can bet I'll be hauling it out.

    Right now this is just a proposal from a developer with his hand out. City council hasn't yet gotten hold of this yet - just wait til they do.

    Our job is to keep the media's feet to the fire - the spin is already starting in the local MSM rags.

  • Luck

    2 years ago

    Tar & feathers 2 nice Zalm, we need impeachment and jail for em

    Hay Zalm I know you have it in you.

    This is hell what they doing

    Your doing excellent work on HST.

    Your a new you since I last met you.

    Maybe you are the Clint we need at 80.

    At least you listen to the people.

    These liberals are not a hard act to follow for you.

    Come get it on politically man you have a lot of great people around you.

    Go man Go

  • zalm

    2 years ago

    Luck

    You may be right on all the above, but I'm not the tulip Zalm from Holland.

    But I do take my inspiration from the Zalm you mean - tell nothing but the truth, especially to power. And I agree - great work he's doing on the HST.

  • G West

    2 years ago

    @offended

    I don't think, just because Concert uses 'Union' Pension funds to support YOUR pension, or my pension, means that I need to look the other way at the operations of the equally big (and often just as bad) businesses involved.

    The point of my post clearly was that you can't attack Campbell and his friends' special rules for insiders tactics and ignore the same thing just because it's our pension that benefits. I think there have been shady special deals under previous, more labour-friendly regimes and I don't think, as an honest commentator, that I can ignore those things while criticizing what Campbell's been up to for the last 10 years.

    In fact, that’s the kind of hypocrisy that gets us INTO trouble – not out of it.

  • happy

    2 years ago

    Well said West

    Well said. I must ask though what your definition of "labor friendly" constitutes. Obviously you mean the NDP, and if you belong to a public service union, then yes, they certainly are more "friendly" as one way of putting it, to those members.
    But what about the private sector? The majority of the workforce. How did the NDP benefit that labor group during the 90's? All I recall was they made it easier for unions to organize a non union shop by removing the requirement for a secret ballot during the certification process. Which then opens up the very real possibility of intimidation. After all, if the workforce at a company truely wants a union then why would the union be afraid of letting them have a secret vote?

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.