Let Us Honour the Example of Roy Jacques
He belonged to a fierce group of BC news lions. Who roars now?
Roy Jacques died at the age of 93.
I don't like talking about the "old days." I try to look at the past for lessons only and look at the world and its future through the eyes of my 29-year-old grandson. However I must talk about the past today for the death last week of Roy Jacques, newsman and commentator non pareil should give us all pause for retrospection.
There was a time in B.C. politics when the "establishment" and the government that represented it (the "establishment" is of the left as much as the right) had to face tough journalists who were experts at holding feet to the fire. These men and women considered that to be part of a journalist's duty.
Roy Jacques was one of the band of hard nosed commentators that made the '60s through to quite recently a period where the public could really see what was going on. He was a scourge to politicians and to those in authority generally. I like to believe that I was part of that band until 2005, but that's for others to say. What I can attest to as a former politician and B.C. cabinet minister is that in days of yore politicians knew that they were under the magnifying glass at all times. (Not on private matters -- a politician's private life was his/her own unless in interfered with duties to be performed.)
I didn't know Roy that well, though we knew each others' work and had spilled a drink together on occasion. He did, however, enroll me and pay for my membership in the International Order of Old Bastards -- high praise indeed (I think.)
Roy was well known for his no-nonsense approach to his craft and his long association with McIver's Appliances and Services, Limited. I especially remember Roy's calling W.A.C. Bennett "the ironmonger" referring to his days as owner of a hardware chain.
A fire that needs to be rekindled
There was a time when free speech prevailed in our province. Look at the sorry state it's now in.
There has always been self-censorship amongst writers and broadcasters. But it's always been wrong. Now it's so pervasive that the B.C. media can be called, with little exaggeration, the government organ. One need only compare the media's monstrous lack of attention to the fish farm and rivers issues to what the media of the past did to Premier Glen Clark's fast ferries fiasco. One columnist, Vaughn Palmer of the Vancouver Sun was like a dog with a bone as he exposed the ferries issue. But on the fish farms and rivers issues, to say the coverage has been spotty is to overstate badly. The only mainstream exception is the Globe and Mail's Mark Hume.
Permit me to digress. When I see Global BC TV using flashbacks to Jack Webster as part of their self-promotion I want to throw up. Jack couldn't have worked a moment for today's pitiful facsimile of a TV network even if he ran out of money for whiskey. This is not the BCTV of Keith Bradbury and Cameron Bell, leather tough producers -- its newscasts are about as exciting as a cooking show or the Golf Channel.
Were those the "good old days"?
They were if you opposed the government, not so good if you were the government or a supporter. The essence of those times was that politicians in power -- indeed the establishment -- were accountable. It's true there was no Freedom of Information law but that law is only of benefit if the politician has to face the music, and is not able to hide behind the censor's blackout. In short, Freedom of Information ought to be part of solid journalism, not instead of it.
But was journalism back in that period fair? Did these journalists always get it right?
Not all the time by any means but they were tough and accurate much more often than not and they were true to themselves and the public they served.
Did politicians like what they said and reported?
Did I like the way they bad-mouthed me?
Of course not, but they we weren't supposed to. Moreover, it made better ministers of us if only because apart from the opposition and the press, all cabinet ministers mostly hear is fawning flattery. We sure as hell didn't get that from the media.
Where are the brave owners?
The fault is media ownership. Owners have a vested interest in not displeasing the government that issues and renews their radio and TV licenses. When I watch a "journalist" in the national media lobbing the soft pitches at politicians I try to imagine Jack Webster in the same spot. The contrast is stark. As one who has seen Jack work and Central Canada press types lob slow pitches I can tell you that given an opportunity he would have grabbed the mic and yell "give that to me, you dumb bugger, and let me show you how it's done."
For most (but not all) of my radio career I was fortunate to have my contracts with CKNW as owned by Frank Griffiths. There were attempts to muzzle from the station from time to time (perhaps a half-dozen) during my time but I could stand my ground because management always knew that Mr. Griffiths would back the broadcaster.
Example: Back in the Vander Zalm years in the '80s, George Garrett and I would watch this dazzling ongoing display of mediocrity and report and comment. The Zalmoids, as we called the premier's supporters, would take up hours of management's time complaining about George and me. One day some sales people went to manager Ron Bremner complaining that if Mair didn't stop picking on the government they would not be able to sell advertising.
They had gone to the wrong manager as "Brem" told them that if they couldn't sell ads with Rafe's ratings, they should get into another line of work. He followed that with an essay on free speech that would have made John Wilkes and Tom Paine blush with pride and had it posted throughout the station.
The price we pay
Free speech is often hurtful and invariably uncomfortable. But as they say about being alive, it sure as hell beats the alternative.
Never in my lifetime has the public been so ill-served by the media and we pay for it with government for the few at the expense of the many, with government that is unchallenged thus autocratic. In fact I don't believe that it's a stretch to say we live in an elected autocracy.
Roy Jacques, rest in peace and when you meet that oatmeal savage Webster, don't tell him what's happened since he left -- let him rest in peace too. ![]()



11
Login or register to post comments
seth
2 years ago
media payoffs
One reason the MSM today is so soft on El Gordo is the large amount of money paid to their pundits to speak at business functions.
They have consistently refused to tell us how much that is stating only that they also get paid to speak at union functions. From my experience the unions would be hard pressed to come up with a dollar and donut but big business would view any speaking fee as a very valuable campaign donation.
These days, these same are having their fun at El Gordo's expense in McMartin's phase one of the election cycle, in an effort to restore their credibility. Mid way through the cycle they will undoubtedly revert to their fawning ways.
Of course they also have to mute their scribblings with a look ahead to the reward of a Senate seat.
Jeffrey J.
2 years ago
New Media Monopoly
Everything Rafe says is true, with one exception. Now we have the Tyee (and Public Eye, and Rabble.ca, Gush Shalom, etc), which has squeaked open the door to real freedom of opinion. But otherwise, he is absolutely correct. A couple of excellent books underpin Rafe's point. The classic is Ben Bagdikian's New Media Monopoly, which traces US media owners from an initial 500, then to 50 (in the 80's) and now to 5. Really, really frightening.
Marc Edge's Pacific Press is an excellent history of BC's Vancouver Sun, pre-CanWestGlobal (his follow up book Asper Nation is also not to be missed). Last (but not least) is the inestimable Manufacturing Consent (Edward Herman) which scientifically explicates the financial forces that warp freedom of expression.
And while we're on the topic of honouring courageous journalists, I can't help but add one more hero to Canada's pantheon: the late, great Walter Stewart, whose Towers of Gold, Feet of Clay exposed the Canadian banking system for what it is. Those were better days for democracy. May they return to us again sometime. Sooner rather than later.
KWD
2 years ago
blaming it on media ownership is too easy
In terms of access to information, particularly in the western world, the public is more informed, and aware, than ever. The ubiquitous nature of global strife, man’s inhumanity to man, resource depletion, environmental deterioration, and climatic calamity are not lost on the man on the street.
Paradoxically, it is media driven self-awareness … resulting in a state of overpowering cognitive dissonance … that allows the continued deterioration of controlling forces … like the MSM ... that is at the heart of the problem.
The hard-nosed, Websterized journalism of the past is lost not only because it made life too painful for the power elite and they decided to tighten purse strings, but because it opened the eyes of the common man to his complicity in the destruction of the planet’s life support systems. Self-censorship and narrowing media ownership are logical outcomes.
Mal Content
2 years ago
Roy Jacques
Thank you for remembering Roy. Over 40 years ago, I was a teenaged pump jockey at a discount gas station next to CFUN on 4th ave. Roy was about the only real "adult" employed by that radio station at the time. I'll never forget Roy driving his Rolls Royce from the CFUN garage over to the pumps and collecting his coupons on his gas purchase.
A genuine, gold plated gentleman and a real character.
B9sus4
2 years ago
Another Gibbering Right Wing Crank
Aw, bullshit. That guy was just another RW ranter. You guys are responsible for the current mess. All those years of spewing out stupid, ignorant, antisocial bullshit in order to curry favour with big a few big thieves and gangsters in order to feather your own nest. Now it's come back to bite your ass. Now you're on your stupid save the salmon kick. Wouldn't be necessary except you and your buddy Roy (a goddamn antisemite) poisoned as many minds as you possibly could in order to get all the money for yourself. Rolls Royce, my ass! Nobody who speaks the truth around here winds up with a Rolls Royce.
Go back in your cave, caveman.
frank2
2 years ago
Opinion matters. But of at
Opinion matters. But of at least equal concern is how to pay the high costs of real reporting. Here's an interesting example:
http://canadianmags.blogspot.com/
Hermans Hermit
2 years ago
Back to the Future
"This is not the BCTV of Cameron Bell"
25 years ago Cameron Bell, BCTV's then news director, was consistently lambasted by NDP leader Dave Barrett and IWA leader Jack Munroe for producing biased media coverage in favour of the Socreds.
Even CKNW's morning radio host, Gary Bannerman, was lambasted as a Socred hack. Barrett also lambasted the Vancouver Sun and Province as being Socred media organs.
It's now 25 years later and nuthin has changed. Same old, same old.
"The Zalmoids, as we called the premier's supporters"
Blech! Carole James and the Zalmoids are now forming a communion over the HST. What a friggin unholy alliance.
Viva La BC Visionistas! A new way to govern!
ME2
2 years ago
BC's "free press"
Rafe is right about one thing, for sure. As long as I can remember, the Sun has always run objective stories criticising the Socreds (and now the Reformers) up to a few months before an election, and then slowly switched to supportive reporting, then to finish off with editorials a day or two prior to election day warning that voting for the NDP is to invite Communism and mismanagement into BC. Asper be damned, it's a BC tradition.
The Province has never, ever, even tried to hide its political bias.
Jeremy J.
2 years ago
It's money and mediocrity
Ever since media decided to try to make the news sexy the element of entertainment mixed in has diluted its quality. Mainly because many who want to be a reporter just want to be on TV and have no REAL desire to be journalists. Go to BCIT and ask how many of those students know who the last Prime Minister was. Journalists are born, not made.
I see people who are basically interns reading some local news casts, it's pathetic. I guess it's cause they fit a dynamic and work cheap.
Brian Lord
2 years ago
Rafe Mair Let us honor the example of Roy Jacques
In answer to B9sus4: Not only are you foul-mouthed which in some cases may be applicable ... you are dead wrong using it in reference to this comment. Rafe Mair has honored the Province both as a Cabinet minister and a Talk show host, he has come to a point where he should be respected and you have malighned him. Did you ever meet the man because it is not the premis of a commentator to explain himself so much as To explain his subject matter. You have missed his point and reverting to filth merely makes you sound like a silly uneducated slob. As for Roy Jacques, I worked with him for two and a half years and brother, you are not in the same hemisphere as Jacques. How can I tell that from what you have written? Why because of what you have written -- which amounts to the driveling prose of a fool. I am surprised The Tyee chose you for their best blogs. Politeness dictates that we do not use the term "You are wrong". However that submission of yours makes a great case for dispensing that politeness. Not only are you wrong, you are distatefully wrong about two distinguished gentlemen. You should be ashamed of yourself. You make me and I'm sure others, sick at the stomach. Learn how to write without vulgarity; learn how to understand what a commentator is saying and until you do for God's sake shut up.
YOU'RE RIGHT IT WAS AN OVERSIGHT to select B9sus4's comments as a 'best comment.' thanks for flagging our mistake. TYEE MODERATOR
Hughes
2 years ago
IOOB
Hey Rafe,
I hope you peruse the comments appended to your columns. Harvey Oberfeld has been opining about the toady MSM over at his blog, Keeping It Real, for some time now. I think you should bestow upon him, the same honour that Roy Jacques bestowed upon you ‘n’ secure him a membership in the IOOB.
You OBs are doing us an invaluable service.
Keep up the good fight.