Alberta New Dems release secret agreements about handling public opinion.
Alberta NDP MLA Rachel Notley wants independent investigation.

-
Christy Clark picked the EnCana empire builder to guide her into power, and that says volumes about who's shaping BC's future. Part one of two.
-
Who finally tells us the nasty chemicals used for shale gas drilling in Western Canada? The US Congress.
-
Beyond public scrutiny, vast amounts of BC's water are being dealt to 'fracking' operations.
Alberta's New Democrats have called for a special provincial investigation of controversial shale gas drilling following the release of two leaked government documents showing strong collusion between industry and government on resource development in three western provinces.
A government of Alberta cabinet briefing note dated Aug. 3, 2011 says, "Shale gas environmental concerns in the media and in the public in other jurisdictions are potentially problematic for energy development and environmental management in Alberta."
The note also reveals that one of Canada's most powerful lobby group, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, has approached the Alberta government about shale gas issues in order "to enhance public communication."
"It's another example of Alberta's Conservatives working behind closed doors with industry and keeping it as secret as possible," charged New Democrat MLA and environment critic Rachel Notley. She wants an independent investigation on the technology.
"My biggest concern is that there is a government plan to work with industry on shale gas issues in secret and it's largely about managing public opinion. It's not about science or eliminating the risk to groundwater or the public. It's about telling people they are doing something without actually doing anything."
Another related interprovincial document called for "collaboration and information sharing" on shale gas drilling with the goal of "providing more confidence that hydraulic fracturing use of water for shale gas is well-managed." Yet several pages later it admitted that "lack of complete information" in "a rapidly evolving industry."
Hydraulic fracturing, the practice of blasting deep rock formations with one to five million gallons of water mixed with tonnes of sand and chemicals, has sparked controversy throughout the continent. It's been the subject of lawsuits, bombing campaigns, moratoriums and ongoing U.S. government investigations and studies.
A fracking juggernaut
In British Columbia two independent MLAs, Bob Simpson and Vicky Huntington, recently called for a public inquiry on the development of shale gas given its major impact on provincial revenues, water, land, First Nations and greenhouse gases. (Much of the province's shale gas is contaminated with CO2.) The highly subsidized shale gas industry is the largest source of revenue for British Columbia and Premier Christy Clark's chief political advisor is former shale gas baron Gwyn Morgan.
Although the technology of hydraulic fracturing has opened up vast supplies of natural gas and may be an energy game changer, it has also flooded the marketplace with cheap gas. Repeated fracking of well sites has also caused earthquakes, poisoned surface water, industrialized rural areas and contaminated groundwater and surface water with methane and fracking chemicals. Scientists have also raised concerns about the volume of methane leaking from shale gas operations into the atmosphere. Incredibly, the water-hungry industry has also applied to withdraw billions of litres of water annually from a major hydro-electric reservoir in B.C.
Over the last decade the fracking of 10,000 coal bed methane wells in central Alberta both fragmented critical farmland and contaminated water. Jessica Ernst, an oil patch consultant, has sued shale gas giant, EnCana, for $33-million claiming her water was contaminated after extensive hydraulic fracturing near Rosebud, Alberta. At one point Ernst could even set her tap water on fire. Now she trucks in drinking water.
Her landmark 73-page statement of claim recently made international headlines. It alleges that two of Alberta's key groundwater regulators, Alberta Environment and the Energy Resources Conservation Board, "failed to follow the investigation and enforcement processes that they had established and publicized."
After researchers at Duke University in North Caroline found high levels of contamination in groundwater within a kilometre of fracked shale gas wells in New York and Pennsylvania, Alberta's Tories uniformly dismissed the science last spring.
"The experience we have with drilling in Alberta would preclude those kinds of results," said Alberta Environment Minister Rob Renner. (Alberta has been ruled by one party for 40 years and gets 30 per cent of its revenue from hydrocarbons.)
New West Partnership
Both documents released by the New Democrats relate to the New West Partnership, a little known free trade deal between Alberta, Saskatchewan and British Columbia. The agreement essentially ensures that all three provinces must operate by similar environmental standards or the lowest common denominator.
Under the New West Partnership, Canada's three major hydrocarbon-producing provinces agreed to collaborate on industry water use and hydraulic fracture technology in Dec. 2010.
The secret agreement, which is not on the partnership's website, admits that hydraulic fracturing fluids "can include water, hydrocarbons, gels or inert-gas-based foams." To date none of the three provinces have disclosed what toxic compounds are actually being used in fracking fluids.
'Growing public concern' noted in documents
The lead agency for the collaboration and information agreement on fracking is the BC Ministry of Energy Mines and the project is led by Linda Beltrano. The deal acknowledges that the three provinces lack "a cohesive inter-governmental and inter-agency strategy to address growing public concern in the rapid expansion of shale gas development" and expresses concerns about regulations or policy that might "affect individual provinces' competitive position."
The deal also reveals that shale gas will create "a new large water use category" for which best practices and regulations don't really exist. The agreement's three primary goals are to boost public confidence, "address industry's need for water" and achieve vague "regulatory outcomes."
It also accuses "environmental non-government organizations" of "supporting an ill-informed campaign on hydraulic fracturing and water related issues in British Columbia." The only non-government stakeholder listed on the agreement is the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.
According to the plan, the three western provinces will shortly unveil "consistent communication documents and key messages about shale as development" as well as baseline water evaluations within the next couple of months.
The threat posed by hydraulic fracturing and unconventional oil and gas drilling to western groundwater is no idle matter. More than two million western Canadians use groundwater as their drinking source. In fact nearly half of the population of Saskatchewan and one third of the citizens of Alberta and British Columbia rely on groundwater.
To date the majority of Canada's 30 major aquifers remain unmapped. Moreover all three provincial energy regulators have allowed hydraulic fracturing in coal seams, oil shale and shale gas plays without transparent groundwater baseline studies or monitoring as recommended by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment in 2002. Without proper baseline data, regulators can't track groundwater contaminants. ![[Tyee]](http://thetyee.cachefly.net/ui/img/ico_fishie.png)
Award-winning journalist Andrew Nikiforuk writes the Energy & Equity column for The Tyee. You can read his previous Tyee stories here.
25
Login or register to post comments
Fiat lux
1 year ago
Typical example and one of
Typical example and one of the millions of proofs, all over the world, and in history that :
"Wealth can not be created, only taken from others, from the environment and from future generations"
The ruling classes of history have figured out this simple fact and logic a million years ago, but have been able to sell their right to "create wealth", to their subjects, in other words to enslave and steal them blind, under the guise of religious and now ideology based economic theories.
Will humanity ever wake up and accept the fact of the First Law of Thermodynamics ?
Ed Deak.
Van Isle
1 year ago
Ed, Is the 1st Law of
Ed, Is the 1st Law of Thermodynamics the same as the 1st Law of Economics? Scum will rise to the top?
rantnic
1 year ago
LUCKY FOR THE FIRST LAW
Van: We can all be grateful that the scum which rises to the top, is cleaned and filtered by the main stream media and the ballot box. It's all as clear as the driven snow (job).
Fiat lux
1 year ago
The scum will always rise to
The scum will always rise to the top, waving different flags and religious symbols, licencing their rise.
Like the English proverb: "You hang on Joe, I am in the lifeboat"
When we look at the proverbs of different cultures, there's more wisdom in them than in all the ideological and economic textbooks put together.
Ed Deak.
gsarahs
1 year ago
There's that name Gwyn Morgan again!
Having Gwyn Morgan being Chrusty Clark's chief political advisor is like having the wolf looking after the province's chickens. This is the first time that I have heard of the "New West Partnership", or was it really that secret?
I wonder why the MSM haven't brought this agreement to our attention? Nothing like having an agreement that ensures that "all three provinces must operate by similar environmental standards or the lowest common denominator", in other words a race to the bottom as far as environmental regulations! Is there no limit to the scummy things that this government will stoop to? It sure seems more and more apparent that the environmental groups were sure hoodwinked when they supported the Lieberals during the last election!
reallife
1 year ago
Not a balanced discussion
Nikoforuk is noted for his rants against the petroleum and natural gas industry. He has gone so far as to write a book sympathetic to a group accused of terrorism in northern Alberta. This article is typical of his work and is full of innuendo. For example:
"Much of the province's shale gas is contaminated with CO2."
- All BC's natural gas contains CO2.
"The highly subsidized shale gas industry is the largest source of revenue for British Columbia and Premier Christy Clark's chief political advisor is former shale gas baron Gwyn Morgan."
- The auctioning of rights to explore for shale gas in BC has provided billions of dollars for health and other government services in BC. Much of the money spent by industry will never be recouped through production. Incidentally, Morgan previously worked for Encana, a major investor in oil and gas throughout North America, not just in BC.
"According to the plan, the three western provinces will shortly unveil "consistent communication documents and key messages about shale as development" as well as baseline water evaluations within the next couple of months."
- Now here is a truly subversive activity: three western provinces working together to address a resource development issue.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
The issue is not the
The issue is not the "resource development", but the "consistent communications documents"
In other words, the propaganda to sell the development.
Ed Deak.
G West
1 year ago
reallife
Have you any idea how the royalty program 'works' in BC...?
You should do a little more digging - the kind Nikiforuk has done and the reason he's won quite a number of awards for his journalism.
Here, take a look:
http://www.magazine-awards.com/index.cfm?ci_id=1397&la_id=1
How many writing awards do you have?
RickW
1 year ago
I guess the moniker "reallife" is accurate.....
His post shows up the effects of the CAPP's efforts "to enhance public communication."
anne cameron
1 year ago
another
very fine piece of reporting, Andrew! Well done. And if any of the rest of you have the fortitude to do it, read Andrew's book on The Tar Sands...know before you do that your blood will boil and your tears will flow.
Thank you, Tyee. Thank you , Andrew.
zalm
1 year ago
When even the MSM begins to notice
...that';s theres something wrong, it's gratifying, even as it's too late.
Don Cayo gets it partly right in his column today.
http://www.vancouversun.com/opinion/Spending+resource+royalty+revenue+deprives+future+generations/5277657/story.html
Spending our inheritance today, saving nothing for tomorrow, and fouling our own nests. Our kids will all piss on our graves.
igbymac
1 year ago
It's time the electorate ...
took the default position that 'nothing' between the corporate powers and government is on the 'up and up'. It's sad that the obvious is so hard for us to see.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
The obvious is hard to see,
The obvious is hard to see, because the public and all our political parties
are being misled by miseducated, lying and paid off economists.
There's no such thing as "cheap" and there's no such thing as "monetary efficiency".
These are lies to cover up the transfer of real, disastrous physical costs on the public and the environment.
Costs can not be cut, only transferred.
Ed Deak.
Bailey
1 year ago
Lies cause unintended consequences
Here's the thing. If we view the absolute truth as a line through history, then everyone living on that line will base all decisions and actions on it. I mean all their efforts will be designed to have whatever effect they are hoping to achieve based on their understanding of reality. Truth is a way to understand reality.
Every time somebody lies, especially somebody influential, then everybody who believes the lie will base all their plans and strategies on that false belief. Every action they take will still be designed to create a particular effect, but will begin to have effects that will appear random and unpredictable. Acting on false beliefs.
This randomization will multiply both over time as the lie persists, and people attempt multiple plans based on it, and also with the increased volume as more and more people believe the lie and start to base their planning on it.
This is the main reason why our societies are going so terribly wrong lately. Political and corporate leaders, with stunning tunnel vision and very limited objectives are polluting everybodys understanding of the true nature of the world, and subverting their hopes and dreams for the future, consigining them to complete and predictable failures with the reasons hidden.
We no longer even understand why our actions are having the wrong outcomes, because we can't see the truth at all anymore, only the lies our leaders are telling us.
Why should the world be allowed to need water or food when some crooks might be able to get money for them, after all?
RickW
1 year ago
Bailey
And in the simplest of ways:
http://www.globaltvbc.com/thrifty+foods+goes+back+to+plastic+bags/6442467091/story.html
reallife
1 year ago
GWEST
Yes, I most certainly do know how the royalty system works in BC. I specialize in oil, gas, coal and mineral regulatory systems and provide a balanced view for my clients - something Mr. Nikoforuk does not appear inclined to do.
jay1200
1 year ago
shale gas
so what should we do? we are told the fantastic wealth that will be created by the very same people who say they need the freedom to do whatever it takes to generate wealth. in the case of gas fracking...there is a glut of gas on the market, still more is searched for and the environment is damaged and guess who pays! not the developer....we do with a diseased environment, diseased people, diseased business climate, and the developers get to walk away from the disease.
christy clark is gordon campbell in drag! she is a neo-liberal and a globalization free trader...maybe she is a traitor as she is possessed by the corporations to skew things their way, not ours!
igbymac
1 year ago
the royalty system and a balanced view ...
is somewhat of an oxymoron.
Understand that fact and you'll see you are likely peddling legal fictions to your clients.
Fiat lux
1 year ago
Governments and crooks are
Governments and crooks are collude in more fields than just on shale gas.
That's how directorships are earned.
Ed Deak.
Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone
Matt Taibbi reports: "For the past two decades, according to a whistle-blower at the SEC who recently came forward to Congress, the agency has been systematically destroying records of its preliminary investigations once they are closed. By whitewashing the files of some of the nation's worst financial criminals, the SEC has kept an entire generation of federal investigators in the dark about past inquiries into insider trading, fraud and market manipulation against companies like Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and AIG."
READ MORE
G West
1 year ago
Oh it'll work all right for your clients - no doubt
For the people of the province and the future - not so much.
Nikiforuk has a reputation to protect AND he doesn't hide behind a label and call people names - if you actually are what you say you are then I'm surprised you're posting anonymously - I'd have thought you'd like the advertising.
G West
1 year ago
In fact reallife
Royalties for natural gas production won't make this province anything if we don't start charging sufficient royalties to at least equal the opportunity costs we're pissing away. I assume you tell your INVESTORS about the royalty holiday on now - less than 1% for nearly all new gas, and 4-11% on all old gas.
Even Alberta had enough sense to realize that approach was bogus.
Furthermore, I'm sure you point out that the royalty regime is dependent on market price and that the public purse is getting just a pittance now. In fact, as you well know BC gets more for selling drilling rights than for production.
And, we're shouldering a hell of a lot of infrastructure costs to cosset your buddies in the industry to boot.
Tell us another one about how gas and oil are paying for the good society here in BC - and tell us at the same time you explain away the Alberta tags on the half-tons driven by the guys doing the drilling.
We're throwing away our inheritance for a pittance.
As a self-declared insider, you know all that too, I'd wager.
Miss Christy's government doesn't believe in charging its friends a fair price for a valuable one-time natural resource bonanza.
It certainly does believe in making it a friendly place for free booting profiteers though.
Have a nice weekend and maybe take the time to actually 'read' what Andrew Nikiforuk is saying.
Cheers.
G West
1 year ago
For those wanting more details about the sweetheart deal
For those wanting more details of the sweetheart deal from the BC government that makes investing in BC oil and gas exploration and development such a great deal for the gas and oil companies and such a bad deal for the people and the economy of British Columbia you can find the details here:
http://www.empr.gov.bc.ca/OG/oilandgas/royalties/infdevcredit/Pages/default.aspx
Enjoy
alda
1 year ago
I commend the NDs for
I commend the NDs for calling the government out on this issue but one small party standing up in Alberta against the behemoth will not make a fig's dent with the public.
As they insist upon doing, Alberta's four centre-left parties only continue to weaken themselves in their stubborn opposition to working together. Fat lot of good this does the average Albertan...
The Dude
1 year ago
Zalm writes : "Spending our
Zalm writes : "Spending our inheritance today, saving nothing for tomorrow, and fouling our own nests. Our kids will all piss on our graves."
Yeah, then we will light our piss on fire and and let it all burn b/c it ain't gonna be able to be fixed... BC - is that a time or a place?
RockyRacoon
1 year ago
This fracking has to be about the most dangerous practice around
and that water is worth more than the gas and or oil it is getting out of the ground. I know the irrational economic system plays havoc with our conscousness but I have to say even though I know better-it is as if evil were playing tricks on all of us....I used to think that same thing when as a univestiy student I studied modern social theory and of course World War Two. It wasnt until I read Trotsky some 30 years after my formal univesity education that I could actually make sense of what happened or had it explained in a way that made sense I should say. Trotsky on Fascism can be found in Ernest Mandel's Trotsky As Alternative. I would suggest this as required reading for any ostensible progressive.
RR