News

Feds 'Changed All the Rules' for BC Aboriginal School Funding

Money doesn't match promises, say frustrated First Nations education advocates.

By Katie Hyslop, 29 Jun 2011, TheTyee.ca

Kid hits the books

BC First Nations schools receive 25 per cent less funding than public school counterparts, says negotiator.

Related

The federal government has made historical strides in relations with Canada's First Nations population, the most recent step being the announcement of a Joint Action Plan with the Assembly of First Nations on Aboriginal education. But if ongoing negotiations over an education funding formula between the government and the First Nations Education Steering Committee here in British Columbia are any indication, the Conservatives may have trouble putting their money where their mouth is.

In 2006, the Government of Canada published legislation that gave First Nations groups in B.C. the right to exercise jurisdiction over education delivered on reserves. Since that time, the Department of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development (formerly the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs) has been in negotiations with the First Nations Education Steering Committee (FNESC) over a funding formula.

Though a slow process, Christa Williams, a jurisdiction negotiator for FNESC, thought it was going well until last Christmas when government turned the tables.

"At Christmas time, December 23, Indian and Northern Affairs at that time sent us a letter and changed all the rules around the funding," Williams told The Tyee.

In the letter, the government presented FNESC with three new options: take a funding cut; receive more funding but lose some education jurisdiction to government; or continue to negotiate but with government taking First Nations own-source revenue into account when providing funding for education.

"If a First Nation is generating any amount of revenue, that amount of revenue would be clawed back from the education transfer payments from the department," says Williams, speaking to the own-source revenue option.

"If people who go and have employment and rebuild our economies, that's going to be clawed back from education, so we'll never be getting further ahead. I think that flies in stark contradiction to the commitments that were made on June 8 in the Joint Action Plan."

However in an emailed statement to The Tyee, Aboriginal Affairs Spokesperson Geneviève Guibert says the government sees own-source funding as First Nations working in partnership with the government on education funding.

"The establishment of self-government requires a shared responsibility among the parties to the agreement, with First Nations contributing some of their own revenues, where possible, to cover the cost of education delivery," she wrote.

"This is a national perspective, and it is consistent with the own-source revenue agreements that we have concluded with Tsawwassen First Nation and the Nisga'a Nation. This is also our position in other education self-government negotiations that are currently underway across the country."

'It's like a shell game': Williams

In a meeting with Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan on July 16, the government offered FNESC $30 million in funding over the next two years. Williams admits this sounds like a lot of money, until you subtract the $8 million per year the government is already paying them.

"It's money that's invested by the region to try and bring some amount of comparability between our funding and provincial school funding. So that leaves a total reinvestment of $7 million (per year), and within that some of the existing targeted programs are also being included, leaving us somewhere between $3 and $5 million of actual new money over 130 schools," she says. "It's like a shell game."

Williams says FNESC would like $27 million in new funding per years to bring First Nations schools on par with the funding received by their public school counterparts, which she says receive approximately 25 per cent more funding.

Guibert says funding comparability between the public and First Nations schools is important to the government and needs to be achieved through partnerships with the provincial and First Nations governments.

"Comparability is about making it possible for students to transition without academic penalty between First Nation and provincial schools. It is also about enabling First Nations to deliver a quality education on par with neighbouring publicly funded schools in the same province," she wrote.

"Simply increasing funding for First Nation education without achieving greater comparability between band-operated and provincial school systems will not necessarily lead to comparable outcomes."

Guibert says government is trying to achieve parity by creating a national Panel of Experts with the Assembly of First Nations to work on improving academic outcomes for First Nations children in schools both on and off reserve.

First Nations education unplugged

Despite ongoing negotiations, some funding decisions have already been made. Earlier this year Aboriginal Affairs announced they would no longer be funding internet connectivity for First Nations schools.

This not only threatens to cut kids in remote areas off from connection with an increasingly globalized world, according to Williams, but also prevents students from taking distance education courses or conducting online research.

"We would lose access to online library services, and that's really important, as in the elementary and secondary schools kids are asked to do research. Most of our schools have very, very poor libraries, if they have a library, and so now that, I think, is a basic service that kids are entitled to," she says.

Guibert says government is currently working on a new program to "address the range of connectivity needs of First Nation communities."

"The new approach will be coordinated to help ensure First Nation communities have access to the same level of connectivity and related economic and social development opportunities as other Canadians," she writes.

While schools will be forced to reexamine their budgets in order to afford Internet fees, they'll have to take into account a 15 per cent holdback on targeted programming funds for First Nations education as of April 1. The government announced the holdback earlier this year, citing an uncertainty in funds for First Nations education thanks to the federal election delaying the budget.

"That means that there would be 15 per cent less money available to First Nations schools this year to implement programs such as parent involvement, support for teacher retention and recruitment, for language programming, for some of the literacy programming that we've put into place," says Williams, adding government hasn't said when, if ever, the 15 per cent will be restored.

"As of April, you have existing contracts with teachers that will take you to June, and then you're also in the planning process for the next school year in September, so it makes it really difficult to offer continuing contracts to teachers when you're not sure if that holdback is going to be released or not."

Guibert concedes the government has held back 15 per cent in funds, but emphasizes it isn't a funding cut and will be reinstated eventually. "However, we need to plan to ensure that once released the funds are appropriately directed to emerging priorities and program requirements," she told The Tyee.

Seizing opportunities to influence government

Despite frustration over the funding formula stalemate with the government, Williams thinks it's a positive move for the Assembly of First Nations to work in tandem with the government to improve Aboriginal education.

"I think we have so few opportunities to influence the government of today that (National Chief Shawn Atleo)'s seizing this opportunity and asking First Nations in Canada to make submissions and to articulate our ideas around solutions," she says.

"It's kind of like if you have no other opportunity, and this is a very public one, we're hopeful that we'll be able to have some influence by increasing understanding and sharing more information, providing examples, that sort of thing."

For their part, the Canadian government says they remain committed to improving First Nations education in Canada through both the Joint Action Plan and continued funding negotiations with FNESC, and sees their funding proposals as a solution to the problem.

"Partnerships are the foundation to helping ensure First Nation students on-reserve receive a quality education and have every opportunity to fulfill their academic potential," writes Guibert.

"This new approach seeks to align and strengthen education programs, services, standards and investments between on-reserve and provincial education systems."  [Tyee]

9  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • pippatch

    1 year ago

    Sounds like

    [OFFENSIVE COMMENTS REMOVED.]

  • marine1941

    1 year ago

    OWN SOURCE REVENUE: No better way to destroy First Nations

    First Nations are functionally small, independent local governments. Just like Municipalities, they get money from government, and raise some themselves, from fees or taxes or other sources. First Nations community members and their leaders then set a plan in place to meet their needs as best they can from their income. Suddenly the Federal Govt has decided that non-government income, generated for specific purposes in the First Nations community, has to be spent on the Governments priorities first...NOT on what the elected officials and community members had identified as the priority for that use.
    To make things worse, there is no coordination in these demands from government. All agencies think their costs should be paid FIRST, before any First Nations priorities are considered. Can you imagine the outcry from Local Governments if the BC Government tried this tactic? Voters across the province would be up in arms...and the Public would tell the government to get its fingers out of Local Government business.
    The same should apply here...First Nations have a right to decide where to spend their OWN SOURCE REVENUE, and what their priorities are....lets have more education on these issues so the public knows how Government is still trying to make decisions for First Nations without understanding the consequences.

  • anne cameron

    1 year ago

    This is just another example

    This is just another example of the on-going policy of slow genocide which has been foisted on First Nations by each and every federal government in Canada over the past 300 years. As soon as First Nations demonstrate they have learned how to play the latest game the feds change the rules of the game, and, eventually, change the very game itself. Statistics show First Nations kids have the poorest chances of any in this nation, the negatives are legion, the on-going impact of Residential School syndrome still flourishes and the federal government continues to lie, cheat, steal, and obfuscate.

  • Fiat lux

    1 year ago

    It would have been

    It would have been interesting to see how much the colonizers of the Americas would have had to pay for the lands and resources if the continents had been owned by some multinational corporations, instead of free to take, rob and ethnic cleanse to "create wealth".

    Or if the children of white races and nations had been kidnapped from their parents, for generations, by "conservative thinkers" and institutionalized for brainwash purposes.

    Sure achieved some magnificent, "wealth creating" results.

    Ed Deak.

  • ASKBiblitz.com

    1 year ago

    Canada still promoting 'separate but equal'

    Sad to see Canada still promoting the separate but equal doctrine the U.S famously put to rest long ago in Brown v. Board of Education. As history shows us repeatedly, separate class of persons means second class of persons. More and more I feel Tsawwassen Nation got it right when they contracted their way out of the grasp of the toxic Indian Act. Independence is the way of the future - a lump sum payment then no more fiduciary nonsense - a load of codswallup devised to enrich the undeserving legal profession.

    What's most frustrating in all this is the way it makes it look as if Indians always have a hand out. As Auditor General Sheila Fraser's office has revealed consistently over the years, the Dept. of Indian Affairs rarely meets even its most basic program goals, including the provision of life necessaries, i.e., safe drinking water, for goodness sake.

    How is it that these awful bureaucrats are never fired or disciplined for such abysmal accounting? Au contraire. They are instead rewarded for their efforts with even more public money. See http://www.askbiblitz.com/aboriginal.php for more on the crazy Ottawa fandango that pits Canadians against our aboriginal siblings. Alas, only First Nations have authority to end the madness as Tsawwassen famously did.

  • anne cameron

    1 year ago

    bottom line

    I doubt anybody can estimate the amount of fortune wrenched out of this province in the past century. And without a moral treaty, each tree cut and processed, each tonne of ore, each fish and every acre belonged to First Nations. If none of them for the next ten generations bother to get a job, what ought to be theirs in "royalty" for the resources would more than cover their expenses and needs. Now add in the huge fortunes being made from the sale of hydro electricity, plus gas and oil reserves.

    And tell me that First Nations are not owed, big-time.

    The wealth stolen from this province is surely more than enough to pay for decent education for all children, non-native or First nations!

    We yammer on about children being our most precious resource but when push comes to shove we treat them like disposables. And to write in and say First Nations want to have their cake and eat it too demonstrates such an abysmal lack of knowledge and intelligence that I am gob-stopped. For shame!

  • G West

    1 year ago

    anne cameron

    So nice to see you posting here once again.

    I couldn't agree more with your observations and your sentiments.

    I am worried about something you must be aware of though.

    That's the ticking debt clock being run up on the meter by both the provincial and the federal governments for the First Nations' portion of the legal bills incurred by the treaty process.

    I haven't seen a recent reckoning but I seem to recollect that the total bill was getting pretty high the last time I saw it.

    One hopes that, when the settlements finally come down, the bill won't be so large that the final result will be little more than moot.

    Again, as you so accurately observe, if there was any real fairness in doing the sums there is no question where the debits and credits would end up.

  • Okanagan Orchardist

    1 year ago

    Maybe it is who you know....

    The Penticton Indian Band recently opened up, from pictures and what we were told, one of the most up-to-date elementary schools in BC on Band property. I'm not sure who is paying for it, but it certainly appears to be a good deal for the Band and definitely the kids.

  • SteveA

    1 year ago

    Own source revenue

    Firstly, the position taken by most first nations that ALL the resources which exist above and below as well as flow over the ground is somehow private property based on ethnicity is rather absurd and beyond greed.

    Regardless , many have managed to negotiate generous stipends to their benefit and very large sums of money have poured in to these small, totally unnacountable levels of Government. To not internally earmark some of that income towards education, and still expect more from other levels of Government for same, is a double standard by any definition. Until all levels of Government are open to scrutiny regarding spending habits then actions such as this by Feds is necessary.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.