- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
Feds' Foggy Reply to Tug Crewing Questions
Despite earlier denial, Transport Canada apparently OK with two-man crews at treacherous Second Narrows.
Tugboats in Burrard Inlet. Photo: Environment Canada.
How many crew members are required to man tug boats escorting oil tankers through the treacherous waters of Second Narrows? Seems like a simple question, but getting a straight answer from Transport Canada has proved surprisingly challenging.
Still, The Tyee has persisted for weeks in trying to nail it down, because safely shepherding oil-laden tankers through the most dangerous passage in the port of Vancouver -- indeed, what some mariners consider one of the most risky spots along the southern B.C. coast -- is so clearly an important public issue.
The quest started with a story that ran earlier this July in The Tyee in which Brad MacTavish of the Canadian Marine Services Guild (CMSG), the organization that represents vessel crews and marine pilots, told The Tyee (and Vancouver City Council) that these transits were regularly occurring with only two crew members on board rather than the normal four, based on an exemption that identified the Second Narrows as "sheltered waters."
Transport Canada spokesperson Gillian Glover responded to the Tyee article, saying it was "inaccurate on many accounts... To be clear, [those tugs with two crew] are only allowed to operate with a two-person crew while docking and undocking... Under federal regulations, none of these tugs can conduct a vessel escort through the Second Narrows with a two person crew."
Glover went on to say, "If there are situations where tugs are escorting vessels with a two-person crew, they would not be complying with Transport Canada regulations and we would certainly investigate the matter. If you have information regarding vessels that operating a two-person crew in an operation other than docking and undocking, we would like to know full details in order for us to investigate."
Tyee provided documents from CMSG
The CMSG then provided The Tyee documents issued by Transport Canada that seemed to authorize two-person crews for several tugs operating within "sheltered waters," including assisting oil tankers through Second Narrows.
When The Tyee provided these documents to Transport Canada, the reply from the federal body was difficult to decipher.
According to Glover, "it is incorrect to state that 'these vessels are authorized to conduct tanker assists through Second Narrows with "reduced" crews.' The crew numbers have not been reduced. The regulations require that these vessels are only allowed to operate with a two person crew while docking and undocking within sheltered waters, which is within five NM from an accessible dock offering refuge."
But how does this square with earlier assertions from Transport Canada that "tugs... escorting vessels with a two-person crew would not be complying with Transport Canada regulations"?
Glover responded: "A vessel escort means a tug accompanies a tanker on a voyage outside of the harbour whereas docking and undocking means a vessel travels in sheltered waters, like Port Metro Vancouver, to go to or from the berth."
Does this mean that Transport Canada defines "docking and undocking" as including assisting a fully laden oil tanker through the Second Narrows channel with less than two metres of water under keel during a 20-minute high tide window?
Translation please?
Repeated written attempts to get a clear answer to this simple question from Transport Canada were met with a wall of bland bureau-speak:
"The crewing regulations are part of a multi-layered system to help ensure safe operations in the harbour.
"Specifically the Canada Shipping Act, 2001, states that 'No master of a Canadian vessel shall operate it unless it is staffed with a crew that is sufficient and competent for the safe operation of the vessel on its intended voyage, and is kept so staffed during the voyage.'
"Transport Canada makes the evaluation of minimum number of crew members required for each vessel based on: the life-saving and fire fighting equipment carried on board, the type of vessel and the type of voyage. The watch system, the type of the engine onboard and the number of crewmembers required for an emergency also play a role in determining the acceptable number of crew members.
"Furthermore, safety is a shared responsibility. Our role is to set the minimum safety standard and the crewing regulations meet that goal. We also work with our partners, such as the Pacific Pilotage Authority, Port Metro Vancouver, Canadian Coast Guard, Environment Canada and the vessel operators, who all play all a role in ensuring safe operations of tankers in Vancouver harbour."
The Tyee's reading of this response is that it is a fuzzy "yes" to the deceptively simple question: are tugs assisting tankers through the Second Narrows authorized by Transport Canada to have only two members?
Which we would take to mean that Transport Canada spokesperson Gillian Glover earlier statement to The Tyee...
"Under federal regulations, none of these tugs can conduct a vessel escort through the Second Narrows with a two person crew."
...is at best rather misleading.
"Are you confused yet?" asked MacTavish, when queried for comment. "Do they support or not support the use of two man crews?"
This practice is clearly something that crew members feel is unsafe. According to MacTavish, "Transport Canada is responsible for setting the safe manning levels for operation of these vessels to ensure the safety of the crews and the public. They are being negligent on many levels allowing the use of two man crews for anything other than docking and undocking. They have a requirement that the minimum crew must be able to man the vessel while fighting a fire or recovering a man overboard. This can not be done with two men on board."
And what about the assertion from Transport Canada that it is up the vessel master to ensure safe crewing requirements?
MacTavish is dismissive. "A master can enforce crew size up to the safe manning document but if he was to insist on more than the document he would be fired and we would have no defense."
MacTavish and the CMSG have a meeting scheduled with Transport Canada on Oct. 22 that they hope will finally resolve this issue. "This coast is the only place the regulations have been twisted like this and we do intend to stop it." ![]()




4
Login or register to post comments
Paddon Developments
1 year ago
"Transport Canada is responsible for setting the safe manning le
Transport Canada sould consider more than a two man crew. They changed the railroads and I always hear,"Who's running the train? Don't they have a conductor or a trainman, don't they have a caboose?" I had been at the first narrow bridge and a large power boat lost it's engine and one large cruise ship was entering and a few large industrial ships were also passing and the Trident Nuclear ship was at anchor just off the foot of w16th W.V. I had been introduced to Cates Park, at the other side of the Second Narrows, where the bird and waterfowl sanctuary is, by Honourable MLA Phil.Gaglardi's nephew. He also introduced me to "under the bridge" at the First Narrows where we swam and had BBQ's. The water at these point is treacherous. I called about the power boat, it was drifting into the bottom of the towers below the Sulper Piles, as I left.
At the Second Narrow, under the train bridge that lifts to allow large ships to enter into Indian Arm and the Industrial oil and industry areas of Pt.Coquitlam/Pt.Moody, the water at tides is fast. in our 26 foot boat Azimat, I was almost at a standstill, quite like Dodds Narrows that runs too fast for a 9.9 engine to get through at fast and low tides. The Second narrows Bridge and its train bridge goes into Vancouver where I believe a corridor called the Boundary Street Corridor would service Seymour,N.Vsncouver to the Constitution Tunnel. The sktrain subway corridors to the business, universities, and Tourism areas.
Thank You, Anna Paddon,
RockyRacoon
1 year ago
It doesn't sound safe no matter how many crew members are on
board. A 20 minute window during high tide with less than 20 feet of water from the keel? I am surprised we haven't read of a disaster happening here yet. Quite surprised. This federal government really is a danger to public safety. They should be institutionalized somewhere. Maybe to one of those countries where we swept up innocent civillians who were then sent to another country for in-terror-gation in the practice called rendition that we still have not gotten straight answers about. So Harper is in contempt of parliament and contempt of court over the Kadr case-any wonder that the rest of the world doesn't want Canada to have a set at the security council table?
snert
1 year ago
Swap paint
It's not a close call until some paint and barnacles are swapped. jeez!
Further the 20 min. window is just for slack tide. The actual direction of the tide can provide assistance if the ships are being moved on the appropriate tide.
One or two ships a day should not normally be cause for concern if attention is paid to the tides. However things could get dicey if they started to run more ships on a daily basis. I just don't see that happening, though.
One would also think that the duties of the third man would have been mentioned in this article. It seems he's not even important to the writer.
Francis
1 year ago
Hard Travelin'
Anybody who has ever dealt with Transport Canada knows what a challenge it is.
This story quotes them as describing the entities they are charged with regulating as "partners". They have often also described their "partners" as "clients".
This display of endearment to the vessel operator, a port or an authority does not lend itself well to a healthy respect of the regulator. In this case Transport Canada.
Although all the parties above are described as partners and clients, I have never heard the public, or community or even marine labour described as a partner. No, I think these entities are described by them as "special interests".
So how is it that NGO's or labour, or even a city are special interests when a company like Seaspan or Smit is a partner?
If the community is going to have confidence in the transit of tankers through our ports, and that's what it is, its a transit of the tanker, not a berthing or unberthing, if the special interests of the public are to be assuaged we need a more responsive and more robust inspection and regulatory program.