News

Dump Health Honcho, Says NDP, Citing Leaked Letters

New Vancouver Coastal Health chair had urged minister to let publicly funded hospital buy services from private clinics.

By Andrew MacLeod, 28 Apr 2010, TheTyee.ca

Woodward

Vancouver Coastal Health chair Kip Woodward.

Related

Newly leaked letters show why Kip Woodward should not be the head of Vancouver Coastal Health, the New Democratic Party's health critic said today.

In one of the letters, Woodward urges that a publicly funded health organization that he chaired be allowed to buy services from private clinics. Woodward, through a family company, has investments in one such clinic.

The letters were written before Health Minister Kevin Falcon announced on April 12 Woodward's appointment as chair of Vancouver Coastal Health's board.

The letters, which include suggestions for how public health agencies can generate more revenue, shed light on an "agenda" shared by Falcon and Woodward, charged NDP health critic Adrian Dix.

"If you're a chair and an important official, one of the senior leaders of public health care in British Columbia, advocating positions that would change that system contrary to the current law, it's probably not a good thing," said Dix, who declined to say where he got the letters.

"And if you're an investor in a major private health care facility in the province, then you have to, I think, give up those private investments if you want to lead the public health care system," he said.

Woodward did not respond to a request for an interview by publishing time.

Ideas on investment firm's letterhead

Before the appointment, Woodward was chair of Providence Health Care, an organization that delivers publicly funded health care, including at Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, Saint Paul's Hospital and six continuing care facilities.

While at Providence, Woodward wrote two letters to Falcon on Woodcorp Investments Ltd. letterhead, released by the NDP today. The letters mainly advocate for more opportunities for health care providers to generate revenue, but also suggest increasing the role of private health care providers.

"Allow Providence Health Care to bid for services from private clinics," Woodward wrote. "The introduction of competition for health care service delivery is the single best tool for cost management, and yet we are prohibited from doing this currently."

As it happens, Woodward's family investment company owns shares in a private clinic, as Public Eye reported on April 15, and he formerly sat on the board of Cambie Surgeries Corp., which runs private clinics.

"Mr. Woodward is advocating a position in this case that would directly benefit Cambie Surgical Centres and other private clinics," said the NDP's Dix. "He's doing so as chair of the board of a major public health care unit, Providence Health Care, and it seems to me . . . [that] raises some questions around conflict of interest."

The Cambie clinic is also among those suing the provincial Health Ministry in a case related to extra billing.

'He's bringing forward ideas': Falcon

Falcon said he's aware of Woodward's financial interest in the clinic but doesn't think it's a problem. "He's disclosed completely that he has an interest through a family company that he's not involved in the day to day operations of," he said. "As long as you disclose the interest it doesn't mean you must never have anything to do with even commenting on whether private clinics can be used or not."

Woodward was an outstanding chair at Providence and will continue to do an excellent job for the health authority, Falcon said. He has received no remuneration for filling either position, he said.

"He's bringing forward ideas as I've asked all health chairs to do and in fact I've asked doctors and nurses and the members of the public to bring forward ideas on how we can have a sustainable health care system," he said.

Revenue growth needed: Woodward

"I cannot emphasize strongly enough my conviction that without opportunities for business development and revenue growth, the public health care system is not sustainable," Woodward wrote in October 2009. "For Providence, in particular, the issues are a lack of control over how and how much we are funded."

He continued, "The assumption that we can maintain a world class system of health care by focussing exclusively on cost containment is self-defeating. Sooner or later, we have to start talking about cost recovery."

He sketched 17 ideas to bring money in to Providence. They included charging non-Canadians more for health services, much as international students pay higher fees than Canadians do for university courses. "Why not let Providence Health Care set rates for non-residents based on actual costs and what the market will bear?" he asked.

"We have spent millions training and obtaining some of the world's finest physicians," he wrote. "Let's use them."

He cited cardiology, HIV/AIDS, mental health and eating disorders as areas where people from elsewhere might pay to be treated at Providence. Aging "clients" or those with a chronic disease could be sold "high end boutique services," he said. Providers should be allowed to extra bill for services that the province's Medical Services Plan doesn't pay for, he said.

The suggestion followed on a September letter where Woodward told Falcon, "I agree with you that too much time and study goes into every effort." He assured him, "We are sensitive to public perceptions and politics."

A briefing note VCHA staff prepared for Falcon ahead of a Nov. 30, 2009, meeting with Woodward said, "Evaluating the merit of each concept requires analysis which has not yet been undertaken. A number may align with the analysis underway on medical tourism." It suggested striking a team with members from the ministry, Providence and the health authority to evaluate Woodward's list. "It is not possible to determine which ideas have merit without further work," it said.

'Recipe for Americanization': Dix

The NDP's Dix said it makes little sense to sell access to things like treatment for eating disorders when there are already long wait lists for British Columbians needing help.

Woodward is advocating using the public system that "all of us paid for" and using it to serve a private clientele, Dix said. Those kinds of changes will cost more money, make the system less efficient, and force people to wait longer for treatment.

"This is a recipe, these proposals, and outright advocacy, for the Americanization of health care," he said. "I have no problem with Mr. Woodward advocating for American health care. I have no problem with Mr. Woodward investing in whatever for-profit health care clinic he wants to invest in. What I do have a problem with is secret discussions, a secret agenda, between the minister and Mr. Woodward."

Falcon and Woodward are both on the fringes of the debate over public health care, said Dix. "Hopefully this will disclose a little of what their agenda is."

As chair of a health authority, Dix said, Woodward should be dedicated to protecting public health care, not advocating changing it in ways that would contravene federal and provincial laws.

That Falcon appointed Woodward to the position says a lot, Dix said. "Clearly he was aware Mr. Woodward held these views and was promoting those views when he made him the head of Vancouver Coastal Health."

Vancouver Coastal Health, as Falcon's April 12 announcement of Woodward's appointment says, "is responsible for the delivery of $2.9 billion in community, hospital and residential care to more than one million people in communities, including Richmond, Vancouver, the North Shore, Sunshine Coast, Sea to Sky corridor, Powell River, Bella Bella and Bella Coola."  [Tyee]

23  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Camero409

    2 years ago

    More Pigs at the trough

    Written in a language LIbERalS understand; Oooooiiiikkk oink oink oink grumph grumph, sluuuuurrrrp slurrrrrppppp, chomp chomp chomp glug gluuuuug gluuuggggg. Oink oink! If this weren't so obvious that this is the leading edge of the destruction of our medical plan then nothing is. I can't wait to work on the recall!

  • off-the-radar

    2 years ago

    great reporting

    thsnks for a well done story.

    So interesting to see this indepth article contrasted to the lighter CBC and Globe versions.

    This article provided the context I needed to understand Adrian Dix' concerns.

  • Skywalker

    2 years ago

    The foxes are both in charge of the hen house...

    ...and giving advice to the farmer on the care of the hens and the farmer (Falcon) see nothing amiss. The sooner these clowns are gone, the better off we will all be.

  • Van Isle

    2 years ago

    This is just another story

    This is just another story of how the Liberals are truly bent on unraveling our province's infrastructure. Now it seems that they're in acceleration mode and will leave government with this province in a shell of it's former self. The only way, in my mind, in describing the Liberal Party is that it's psychopathic.

  • cboo44

    2 years ago

    Conflict of Interest? NOPE !

    And what appointee from Gordo's office isn't a strong advocate for privatization? Duh!
    Adrian Dix and the NDP are constantly setting their hair on fire and screaming "CONFLICT" when in fact this is government POLICY. If the NDP would establish and ENUNCIATE sound, common sense ALTERNATIVE POLICY then just maybe we would have a BLOODY ALTERNATIVE to the LIEBERALS !!

  • P. Markunas

    2 years ago

    Kip speaks with knowledge

    I expect that Kip is well aware of the opportunity to attract foreign $$, given his involvement with BC private clinics that profit from servicing foreign patients.

    If we as a society are not prepared to pay more in taxes, and the HST debacle illustrates the visceral reaction of many to such a proposal, then revenue must be raised from somewhere. Cuba does it, for example [please don't start with the arguments that Cuban services to foreigners are vastly superior to those provided nationals and what if that happened here etc etc].

    While I can see that Kip and his investor buddies might benefit from the "anchor company" impact a publicly managed health tourism business could bring to their sector's international profile, building overcapacity into the public system and putting it on the foreign health tourist market might also bring a measure of competition to bear on the BC private clinic sector. Oh, those risk taking entrepreneurs!

    With clearly established guidelines to protect a "Canadians first" policy, the proposal is worth considering - but don't let the privateers manage it.

  • offended

    2 years ago

    And in the meantime

    budgets for surgeries (most of which are elective) are once again, cut back.

    Waiting list for cartilage surgery? At least 8 months.

    Time to start recalling the government.

  • damngrumpy

    2 years ago

    The time has come to state

    The time has come to state in a firm clear manner what
    needs to be done so we can compare the visions both the parties have for health care in this Province.
    It will take the NDP a few well constructed sentences
    because the Liberals don't have a vision. They are
    blindly determined to undermine the current system and
    dispose of the profitable portions to their friends.
    Someone who advocates policies contrary to the laws
    of the Province or the country should be dismissed.
    Its one thing to advocate for unpopular ideas but
    when they cross the line into contravening the law
    that is another matter.

  • jimmy_laroux

    2 years ago

    I am in awe of Kevin Falcon.

    There is absolutely no limit to his utter disregard for the interests of the citizens of BC (other than himself and his cronies, that is).

    Whether or not Woodward kept his investment a secret is totally irrelevant. The issue is that there is a clear conflict of interest.

    Quote:
    As long as you disclose the interest it doesn't mean you must never have anything to do with even commenting on whether private clinics can be used or not.

    "Commenting?" No, Falcon, no. This is not a mere matter of "comment". He is the chair of Vancouver Coastal Health. He has the potential to do much more than just "comment".

  • Takuan

    2 years ago

    the Fibs don't need a vision.

    The idea is to get a once-in-a-lifetime looting spree over with and apres mois, le deluge.

  • samuidave (not verified)

    2 years ago

    Another example

    ...one of far too many, of inexcusable, political breach of trust.

    This is so stunningly obvious that his removal should be a matter of moments, not protracted and unlikely to even occur.

    Yet our system of putting those who feel entitled to their unjust fruits shows just how perverted democracy can be when it is representation of business and not the constituent.

    Welcome to the world of a literate Canadian population incapable of reading more than a line or two, and certainly incapable of change.

  • dorothy

    2 years ago

    Tht's just what's worrisome...

    "Kip speaks with knowledge".

    Yeah, no doubt he does. And no doubt he has 'disclosed' the vested interest. However, how do the not-so-intelligent (in the sense of having insight and 'knowledge') who will make decisions based on his input, how do they figure what part of his knowledgeable speech, if any, is objective impartial knowledge offered for the public good, and what part, if any, is directed by pure biased self-interest? It seems they are not equipped to draw such distinctions, or they would not stand in such awe of his superior knowledge...

    This is why there is legislation regarding conflict of interest, because human nature just ain't operating along such straight lines as we might wish.

    I say to mr. Falcon: have Mr. Woodward turf his vested interest, or turf him. Nothing else is upright dealing, and you owe it to the public of this province to keep things clean.

  • greengreen

    2 years ago

    Don't make waves...

    What a wonderful example of "incrementalism", a most important tool of the neoliberals to dismantle a public system. Step by step, step by step...... HAD ENOUGH YET?

  • Stephanie T

    2 years ago

    Wouldn't it be simpler

    And more to the point if, when asked a question, all of the lying assholes who run this crime ring just said "Fuck you all, we'll do whatever we please?

    RECALL IN THE FALL!!!!!!!!

  • Takuan

    2 years ago

  • Takuan

    2 years ago

  • Takuan

    2 years ago

  • P. Markunas

    2 years ago

    @Dorothy

    Agreed. As I said, don't let the privateers manage it. Kick Kip out.

  • zalm

    2 years ago

    The diagnosis - part 1

    "The introduction of competition for health care service delivery is the single best tool for cost management, and yet we are prohibited from doing this currently."

    If I take Kip woodward's above comment completely out of context and massage it a fair bit, I can make it serve the truth in BC Health care...

    Which is that a vapid reorganization begun under the NDP to bring health care "Closer to Home" by providing hospital boards with governance tools to go with their autonomy, and resources rationalization by combining smaller hospitals into larger organizations; all this has crashed headlong into the BC Fiberals managements skills of "Widgets for the Masses" style of health care management, which is to make big organizations even bigger, no matter how inefficient they become, as long as their Business Case Departments can prove they're using the money they're allocated even more efficiently than they were before.

    Which isn't hard.

  • zalm

    2 years ago

    The diagnosis - part II

    The combination of these two styles of health care political management has produced:
    - large organizations that waste money by hiring up to 40 FTes to tell people where to go for their procedures and help them get there in facilities that are too large to be cared for properly
    - sites that are overbuilt by up to 20% in floor area, causing additional costs in construction, maintenance and operation.
    - reductions in food service quality to meet ten-year renewable contracts that could only become profitable if wages were cut below $11.00 an hour.
    - rationalization of smaller facilities despite their specialization to bolster the case for bigger "all-in-one" facilities.
    - vastly greater per-patient-served operating and maintenance costs for larger facilities despite larger, newer and more efficient equipment.
    - competition between health authorities to create and mandate the most complex and authoritative care plans, employment conditions, facilities upgrades, and operating conditions regardless of outcomes. Such competition produces greater complexity, reduces interoperability and knowledge transfer, and stultifies innovation between facilities belonging to different health authorities.
    - an inefficient tax system that rewards facility fundraisers regardless of the inefficiency of the facility, while penalizing efficient operators of smaller facilities.

    This is an incomplete list. But you should have enough of a flavour of it to realize that large facilities are miserably inefficient users of the resources allocated to our health care system, and that many of the more efficient facilities that provide the simpler 80% of the health care that most people need each day have been shut down, reduced in size and scope, mothballed or otherwise curtailed.

  • zalm

    2 years ago

    A prescription

    This has been the tragedy of of the operation of our health care system. Over the last 14 years we have virtually driven out small, end-user-driven innovation in favour of innovation by management committee, which works as well for our system as it did for GM or Massey Ferguson.

    If "bigger is better" really was the solution, why is it that the tiny Shouldice clinic still produces the best outcomes for hernia repair of any facility in North America, and probably the world? Ignore the private aspects of this clinic - its results are repeatable at any small facility in any health care management system.

    And yet we were heading down this road to efficiency, repeatability and flexibility years ago - from 1989-96 I served on various teams that used statistical methods to improve care, management, operations and reporting. And in the 1996 reorganization to follow the recommendations of the "Closer to Home" Royal Commission, all that was abandoned.

    Bigger is not better. Complexity promotes wastefulness and reduces innovation. I know. As I tug on the rope of innovation at two facilities in Greater Vancouver, I find it still coming away in my hand. The small facility I worked at years ago is still the most efficient facility in Vancouver - by far. Only you can't get any statistics any more to prove it because the management organization bundles all the figures into one global budget to dollar-cost-average their operating costs for the large inefficient facilities downward.

    And that's why Kip Woodward should be fired, despite what I believe are his best intentions. And Kevin Falcon as well who has a bigger shoe size than IQ.

  • mary jane

    2 years ago

    soon gone

    the fiberals are fearful now the people are speaking up loadly. If we all stick together and sign petitions and recall stuff we can get rid of them soon
    I know they will sqwack loadly - like the stuck pigs they are but if we keep the presure up they will be gone soon

  • Takuan

    2 years ago

    soon gone

    but the stink will linger

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.