News

Arts Funding Less than Advertised Say Advocates

BC's overall arts budget $15 million less than two years ago: ProArt Alliance.

By Andrew MacLeod, 4 Mar 2010, TheTyee.ca

krueger.jpg

BC Arts Minister Kevin Krueger says arts groups should be happy

Related

While presenting the British Columbia budget on Tuesday, Finance Minister Colin Hansen made a big deal of the money being put into the arts. Advocates within the sector, however, are unimpressed.

In his speech Hansen lumped the arts spending in with sports. "We are also making new investments to help young British Columbians excel in sports and to increase participation in the arts for all British Columbians," he said.

"Over the next three years we are allocating $60 million for a 2010 sports and arts legacy. Half the funding is targeted to enhancing youth participation in sports, and athlete and coach development. The other half is targeted to arts investments, building on the momentum of the Cultural Olympiad."

That works out to an added $10 million a year for the arts, a sector that's suffered provincial cuts in recent years. This in a budget that includes over $40 billion in total spending.

The minister responsible for the arts, Kevin Krueger, says the legacy fund brings spending in the area to a level as high as it has ever been.

Total funding down

Arts administrators disagree.

"Our numbers don't add up as well as his numbers appear to," said Scott Walker, the co-ordinator for the ProArt Alliance of Greater Victoria.

In its calculations the organization included arts money budgeted for the B.C. Arts Council, the B.C. Arts and Culture Endowment, the B.C. Gaming Commission, the 2010 Arts Legacy and other gaming transfers and committments.

Overall, the commitment for 2010-2011 falls far short of what was available to artists two years ago, he said.

"We see a decline in funding from $47 million in 2008-2009 to about $32 million now," he said. "That's $15 million that's missing."

There are also questions about how the legacy money will be administered, he said. Rather than create a new pool of money, it would be better to maintain funding for the B.C. Arts Council or another body that already manages grants, he said.

"We've just shown the world what not only our athletes can do, but also our artists with the Cultural Olympiad," Walker said. "We'd like to continue the legacy of the Cultural Olympiad, we're just not sure if we're going to be able to do that because of the funding cuts."

BC ARTS TOOK BIG HIT, SAYS ALLIANCE

The BC Alliance for Arts and Culture released a statement Wednesday under the headline: "Reality Check: Arts Funding Cut By BC Budget." Excerpts:

"The BC Arts Council has been cut 53 per cent from 2008/09. This is funding used to provide core support for the creation of cultural experiences like those that thrilled audiences here and world-wide during the 2010 Olympics.

BC Gaming Commission contributions to the arts have been cut 58 per cent from 2008/09. This is funding used to make possible community access to the arts and culture through free public festivals and events.

A $10 million annual supplementary fund has been created, but we do not know how the funds will be administered or distributed.

Interest from the $150 million BC Arts and Culture Endowment remains the same.

The new budget includes $12 million for the BC Royal Museum. This support has remained the same for several years and is essentially a transfer to a crown corporation; this has not traditionally been counted as part of the investment made through grants to the arts and cultural sector.

Total government investment in culture, including the newly announced $10 million annual supplementary fund, has been reduced by 32.4 per cent from the 2008/09 budget."

Artists should be pleased: minister

Artists in B.C. have nothing to complain about, said Tourism, Culture and the Arts Minister Krueger.

"They don't yet realize the tremendous new program we have with the Olympic Legacy Fund," he said in an interview.

The budget included $7.931 million for the B.C. Arts Council, said Krueger. "There's another $10 million to come this budget year and $10 million next budget year and $10 million more the year after that," he said. "They're going to really like what they see there."

(The budget documents actually list $9.379 million for the council in 2010-2011. The ProArt Alliance listed the figure as $9.235.)

"Ten and 7.931 is almost $18 million. The best they ever did was $14.8 million in a year," Krueger said. "They have nothing to reproach us for at all."

There will be money for things like internships and mentorships that help young artists get started, something arts advocates were asking for at roundtables, he said. "The arts groups themselves, once they realize what's coming down the pipe will be happy with it. They should be."

Minister counts funny: critic

The arts groups know exactly what they're talking about, and of course they're not happy, said Spencer Herbert, the New Democratic Party's critic for Tourism, Culture and the Arts.

"It's a big shell game," he said. "They've given with one hand with the hope it would get a whole bunch of press with their legacy fund, but they've taken with the other hand. It's pretty brutal."

Asked about Krueger's assertion that arts funding is as high as it's ever been in the province, Herbert said, "That's completely bogus."

The B.C. Arts Council used to give out $14 million a year in grants, but now it's at $7 million, he said. "Either he multiplies everything by two as an attempt to make it seem everything's fine or he's just making it up."

The province is throwing away thousands of creative jobs, said Herbert. The dance troupe Kidd Pivot is moving to Germany partly because they can get stable funding there. The filmmaker Lynne Stopkewich is leaving Vancouver for Ontario, Herbert said. "Those kinds of cuts will send creative people out of the province when we need to keep them here."

Over the past year the Union of B.C. Municipalities, federal Conservative Heritage Minister James Moore and the province's finance and government services committee have all called for increased arts funding in B.C., he said.

"We saw an incredible outpouring of sympathy for arts and culture in our province in the last year," Herbert said. "We'll continue to fight."  [Tyee]

94  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

    slaves

    do not need to be creative

  • offended

    1 year ago

    The Liberals have lied to us?

    What else is new?

  • Dungeness_Crab

    1 year ago

    I'm shocked, I tell you!

    SHOCKED!

    On a side note, if ever there was a puss that deserved a pie, it's Kreuger's. Our very own, home-grown Karl Rove.

    (I know, BAD crab! *slaps own wrist*)

  • circle A

    1 year ago

    If there`s one...

    Place on this earth that could suck the soul and creativity out of the artistic person it`s this pompous ,sleazy cess pool campbell & co. has turned bc into.And to have a fake like krueger as a minister of culture and arts is a perfect fit.

  • SharingIsGood

    1 year ago

    Krueger not suited

    From the biography available through the government and from this Wikipedia article:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Krueger

    there is nothing that remotely suggests that Krueger is suited for this portfolio. Before becoming an MLA, he worked for ICBC for 20 years. There is nothing in his file that suggests he went to university and if he did, that he took courses related to arts and culture. Although he is seen at his very best in a suit in his MLA file photo (above), from all candid photos and video I have seen of the man, I must say that Mr. Krueger knows not how to dress himself with an artful eye nor carry himself with poise. I don't imgine he blinks an eye when he is told that funding is to be cut for the arts.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    There are many MLAs not suited

    There are many MLAs that aren't suited for the portfolios they get. (applies to both the BC Liberals and the NDP former governments and also to federal Liberals and Conservatives). Some like Christy Clark (Chidren and Families) and Grace McCarthy (Social Services and Welfare) and Bill VanderZalm (Premier) have been a disaster in their respective portfolios.

    But others have done well in their portfoilos. The
    ministries aren't selected on the educational or occupational backgrounds. it's largely based on geography and the supposed talent that the Premier
    sees and has in front of him.

    Would be interesting to see an arts protest led by Mimes.

  • G West

    1 year ago

    Wrong again

    Campbell selects the ministers and the deputies for their ability to occupy a desk, only speak when spoken to, and sign their names when required.

    It was quite clear from the moment that Campbell came to power that he was in charge and that all decisions of any importance would be made in his office.

    For example, Carole Taylor as finance minister did not even 'see' the regulations to the Act introducing the Carbon Tax until the day she signed the legislation.

    Anyone who thinks Campbell invites criticism and constructive contributions from his colleagues clearly has forgotten the examples of Paul Nettleton and Elayne Brenzinger.

    Here's what Mark Hume (G&M April 19, 2005) says about Campbell:

    ...
    Whatever doubts or pressures Mr. Campbell was struggling with that day, he regained his composure, and in the months that followed consolidated his grip on the party, soon becoming its unchallenged leader. "It marked a turn to the right. He became tougher after that and more of a control freak."

    Mr. Nettleton said MLAs, perhaps because of those shaky days, aren't allowed to criticize the Liberal Leader. And few ever do.

    One who did said she was surprised by the way the urbane, self-contained politician suddenly lashed out at her in response.

    Elayne Brenzinger, a former Liberal MLA who is now running for the Democratic Reform B.C. Party, said she quickly learned that "in caucus you couldn't stand up and challenge him, it just wasn't done."

    But Ms. Brenzinger wasn't one to sit meekly by, and when she got a chance to send a zinger at Mr. Campbell, in a caucus meeting, she did. What happened next shocked her.

    "It was late on a Tuesday night. We were all tired. One member was talking about a fundraiser and the Premier made some comment to the effect that he didn't remember it or if he wasn't there it didn't happen.

    "I just said, and it was meant to be funny, 'You know Gordon, it isn't all about you.' It got a big laugh.

    "He got up and walked along, like he does when he's on stage, and then he said it. 'Fuck you too, Elayne.' People laughed a bit but I think most were shocked. I tried to be tough and not show how I felt. But when I went out to the car I was crying."

    Ms. Brenzinger said the Premier later apologized to her, but their relationship quickly deteriorated, until she became convinced she wasn't wanted in the party, and last year walked away.

    "I challenged him and he made me into an example to caucus. You've got to understand, it's a whole different world inside Gordon Campbell's party. It's a cult," she said.

    That's not leadership, that's bullying and intimidation... shameful behaviour every British Columbian should decry.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    "Campbell selects the

    "Campbell selects the ministers and the deputies for their ability to occupy a desk, only speak when spoken to, and sign their names when required."

    Same thing happened with the NDP. Very little dissent or deviation of any great mangitude.

    "It was quite clear from the moment that Campbell came to power that he was in charge and that all decisions of any importance would be made in his office."

    Correct.

    "Anyone who thinks Campbell invites criticism and constructive contributions from his colleagues clearly has forgotten the examples of Paul Nettleton and Elayne Brenzinger."

    Elyane had her own troubles.

    Here's what Mark Hume (G&M April 19, 2005) says about Campbell:

    Nothing new there.

    "Mr. Nettleton said MLAs, perhaps because of those shaky days, aren't allowed to criticize the Liberal Leader. And few ever do."

    Did the NDP MLAs openly in public criticise Glen Clark? Mike Harcourt? Ujjal? Cite examples?

  • Whiskey River

    1 year ago

    BC Boy

    [OFFENSIVE COMMENT REMOVED. -MODERATOR.]

    Sheesh, you make me miss Wilfred Laurier.

    I can`t believe I said that!

  • DPL

    1 year ago

    The fellow gets elected so

    The fellow gets elected so Gordo shifts him around through different ministries. The guy is a zero who can't seem to walk and chew gum at the same time. But a big Gordo supporter and will do anythig to keep the salary

  • G West

    1 year ago

    Whiskey River

    It isn't just members of the cabinet and caucus who are part of the Campbell cult apparently.

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    On the CBC this morning

    The liberals are fleecing ICBC. Instead of providing lower insurance rates they are going to fleece about $600 million form ICBC. According to Hansen it is to make it easier for private insurance. Imagine that. These liars just seem to know no bounds. The millions go to General Revenue. Now if you drive a car you have to pay for the OLympic deficit again. These clowns couldn't run a lemonade stand if they were being supervised by Accenture.

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    BC Boy

    "Same thing happened with the NDP. Very little dissent or deviation of any great mangitude."

    So you were privy to NDP Caucus debates were you? You heard one of the leaders say," F%#k you too! You should really comment on the things you know something about. Limiting but prudent.

  • snert

    1 year ago

    Starving Artists = Fewer Starving Kids

    Sort of. Can't have your fancy cake and eat it to.

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    When it comes to arts funding.....

    ....how come neither Harper nor Campbell have EVER answered the demonstrable fact that, for every dollar spent, something like a buck-and-a-half is returned?

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    RickW

    I think they were using that line for the Olympics.

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    As for snert

    More tax breaks for banks = More starving kids. Can have your fancy cake as long as you take it from the kids, eh?

  • G West

    1 year ago

    Sort of a lot like Marie Antoinette

    15. (1)Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

    Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    Luke doens't know the universe

    Skywalker sed:

    Same thing happened with the NDP. Very little dissent or deviation of any great mangitude."

    "So you were privy to NDP Caucus debates were you? You heard one of the leaders say," F%#k you too! You should really comment on the things you know something about. Limiting but prudent."

    Actually I do. Been around politics for far longer than The Tyee existed, go back to when Will McMartin actually had his own follow the government newspaper.

    There was dissent within the NDP caucus, but things as they are in that environment, the people never hear what goes behind closed doors. Dan Miller when mentioned an expletive when he learned the real cost of the Fast Cats for example in a TV interview.

    The NDP does have dissent, but the public never hears of it.

    That dissent may get louder if Carol James doesn't
    fix the problems in her party to make it more electable to the voters (she missed a big opportunity to do that last May).

    The BC Liberals are giving the NDP an opportunity to find and rebuild themseleves. Don't waste it.

    There's nothing new within how the Caucus operates
    from the NDP and the BC Liberals at the basic level, Campbell is far more micromanaging than any Premier in the past, but the basic rule is the same in any political caucus. Very little public dissent amongst the MLAs (or MPs).

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

    the ringing silence coming

    from the Lieberal crowd on this thread is yet more evidence that no dissent is tolerated in their brown-shirted caucuses. Not one voice raised in their defense, very telling indeed.

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    So BC Boy

    you just disproved an earlier statement you made?

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    and the Fast Ferries are...

    ...a drop in the proverbial bucket compared to the waste of the Campbell Crew. The liberals don't even have dissent in their cheering section on the Tyee, do they?

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

    nahhh!

    I'm sure it's just a coincidence. Still.... can someone shout "Culture!" behind him and we'll see what he reaches for?

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    poverty and fecundity

    Starving Artists = Fewer Starving Kids

    Sort of. Can't have your fancy cake and eat it to.

    Most educated people are well aware that poverty breeds large families for a multitude of reasons. Hence starving artists will have larger families. Who may well grow up to become artists themselves, worryingly...

    There's a limit, of course. I can only look at so many installations of stop signs in a green field.

    Politics and the budget have become a zero-sum game, when the bounty of the world has plenty for all. If only those who have so much would quit trying to hog every bit of it for themselves.

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

    please,

    you don't get it. There is no point in plenty unless you have people with nothing to compare yourself with.

    If our miserable species lucks out and lives long enough to establish an economy of plenty and surplus, we will still have to hire actors to play poor people so we have someone to spit on.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    Skywalker still thinks T-16s back home

    "you just disproved an earlier statement you made?"

    Wrong. Publicly dissenting from the leader wasn't something seen in the NDP, either. Was there any dissent publicly about the FastCats? The "union only" wages for the construction works on the Inland Island Highway? When Harcourt made it more difficult to receive welfare cheques?

    "...a drop in the proverbial bucket compared to the waste of the Campbell Crew. The liberals don't even have dissent in their cheering section on the Tyee, do they?"

    Ask one and find out. The Tyee isn't the most important or "must read" news medium out there in
    Lotusland.

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

    will no one speak

    for the Lieberals? This is getting tedious. Someone, anyone, stand up and defend Drunko. No sport in fish in a barrel,

  • happy

    1 year ago

    Heres a thought

    The Vancouver Art Gallery recieved 50 mil last year from the government for a new gallery which they plan to build in a prime (read-very expensive)location downtown.
    Is this really necessary? Seems pretty elite to me.
    Maybe the VAG should show a little leadership and instead of building palaces use that money to support the artists. It is our tax money.

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    BC (Campbell) Boy

    Now it is obvious that you don't know anything about what happened in the NDP Caucus in the 90's even though you pretend to be an expert in your comparisons. Your defense of everything liberal on these pages is a good indication that it's all hot ideological air.

    Now if the Tyee isn't a "must read", why do you spend so much time here? Anyone so obsessed with countering any attack on the Campbell Gang must be on PAB salary. What the heck are T-16's anyway?

  • John Greg

    1 year ago

    BC Boy

    is a bot.

    ;)

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    Still flying T-16's back home

    "Now it is obvious that you don't know anything about what happened in the NDP Caucus in the 90's even though you pretend to be an expert in your comparisons. Your defense of everything liberal on these pages is a good indication that it's all hot ideological air. "

    Sure. There wasn't any publicly accessible dissent within the NDP Caucus as they are bound to same traditional rules of "keeping it behind closed doors" as the BC Liberals. If that isn't so, then
    there would have obviously been alot of dissent visible to the public, but there wasn't any. None,
    especially when the news came out that the Fast Cats were going to cost alot more than what Glen Clark orginally said they would be. So at that point there was no public dissent amongst the NDP
    ranks, only blind support for a failed projects.

    Even Joy McPhail did not admit early on they would be a failure.

    "Now if the Tyee isn't a "must read", why do you spend so much time here?"

    Same reason any other previous poster. Entertainment.

    "Anyone so obsessed with countering any attack on the Campbell Gang must be on PAB salary. What the heck are T-16's anyway?"

    Re-read your historical roots, Master Luke Skywalker. Let go your conscious self.

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

    alas

    still nothing

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    Still nothing

    Not all that unexpected with the quality of opinion talent.

    Maybe the BC Liberals should increase arts funding.

    The recent posts here are comical at best and there's potential. If some of the posters work hard at it, with a government assistance grant to buy reference material, they would be good for at least a one night gig doing politics at Yuk-Yuk's on Burrard.

    There's potential here, but at this stage of the game, not much that would grab an audience.

    Dream, kids. You want to be on "Canadian Idol" as Canada's newest Rick Mercer with a West Coast flavour.

    But ya gotta work at it.

  • freebear

    1 year ago

    At least the commentator is identified so

    I can skip past the Liberal apologists!

  • G West

    1 year ago

    luke skywalker - that's actually funny

    And 'Skywalker' are different folks - luke hasn't been around for a while because he's been blocked for vile and personal attacks on another poster someone with the personal courage to use his real name (Rod Smelser) as his label – luke skywalker was a right wingish sort of fella who loved to post data from polls and call people names.

    'Skywalker' is quite a different individual - as far as I know, he's never been bounced, banned or warned for his comments here.

    The fact you'd call Skywalker 'luke' is a lesson in irony.

    I will say, if your line about 'entertainment' is honest, that it doesn't take much to amuse you.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    Same label

    "And 'Skywalker' are different folks - luke hasn't been around for a while because he's been blocked for vile and personal attacks on another poster someone with the personal courage to use his real name (Rod Smelser) as his label – luke skywalker was a right wingish sort of fella who loved to post data from polls and call people names."

    So what? Is this a pity party story for someone who uses a label from a science fiction movie?

    'Skywalker' is quite a different individual - as far as I know, he's never been bounced, banned or warned for his comments here."

    So?

    "The fact you'd call Skywalker 'luke' is a lesson in irony."

    and?

    "I will say, if your line about 'entertainment' is honest, that it doesn't take much to amuse you."

    Actually it doesn't, the quality of the commentary here is getting into entertainment though.

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

    the other day

    t'was reminded of the Noble Kurt's "Report on the Barnhouse Effect". Ah, memories.....

    But I digress. He spoke therein of the "Tattletale War". Still remember that, decades later.

    As I am also minded of the waitress serving the tall glass of "water" on the Sechelt verandah. Every day yet. As also I am reminded of the highly placed utility official nearly TWICE run over by the same imbiber yet. Or the private party where the flaming sofa flung out the door elicted little response from the patrolman at the door meeting his boss.

    All we need to do is get the stories known told. Truth and sunshine, like holy water on the UnDead.

  • G West

    1 year ago

    Indeed Takuan

    Welcome To The Monkey House.

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    BC (Campbell) Boy

    I guess since I don't know what T-16's are it must be that I don't spend a lot of time reading/watching fantasy or fiction.

    Although I must confess that some of your blind loyalty to the message from the PAB is enough to get me started. Who in their right mind would believe that gouging the public and letting banks off the hook is a good thing? Who would believe that fleecing ICBC of $600 million and not offering insurance at cheaper rates is a good thing? Who would believe that making ICBC insurance cost more so 'for profit' private insurance could be competitive is a good thing? Who believes that a 14 day party costing a net of about $5 billion is somehow better than a $450 million fast Ferry program? (That is ten times more than fast ferries) Who would believe that BC Hydro being told to buy IPP power at $100 per megawatt hour and selling it for $60 is a good thing? Who believes that the Liberals can run a peanut stand when they allow themselves (that's us BC Boy) to be snookered by the federal government on HST, by the IPP folks, the banks and any of their buddies in business? Not being snookered you say...probably not but if it is anything else like deliberate... then they are a bunch of thieves. Who in the light of fudged budgets and lies about BC Rail and "we will not harmonize" is naive enough to believe anything they say? Who believes let alone defends liars and thieves.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    PAB is not the pad

    "Although I must confess that some of your blind loyalty to the message from the PAB is enough to get me started. "

    Considering that I don't work within the PAB, nor receive anything from them this was intriguing.

    "Who in their right mind would believe that gouging the public and letting banks off the hook is a good thing?"

    Um, the NDP? The NDP gouged the public in regards to excessive spending.

    "Who would believe that fleecing ICBC of $600 million and not offering insurance at cheaper rates is a good thing? Who would believe that making ICBC insurance cost more so 'for profit' private insurance could be competitive is a good thing?"

    ICBC isn't raising insurance rates, and just how low are insurance rates supposed to go? There won't
    be a return to $25.00 a year insurance promised
    and delivered by the Barrett government. I'd like to see drivers with poor driving records and numerous at fault claims be dinged alot more than they are now.

    "Who believes that a 14 day party costing a net of about $5 billion is somehow better than a $450 million fast Ferry program?

    Who whould belive the Fast Ferries actually did any good for the South Coast other than provide a make work project for a shipyard that couldn't even muster the talent to sell their new product properly?

    Who actually believes the whiners and complainers here will actually do something and actually work for the NDP as volunteers to replace the NDP's leader and actually come up with policies that would be won over by the general voter population and not just labour and special interest groups?

    Who actually believes that after 30 years of debating policy resolutions on the topic, that the NDP will actually work to eliminate poverty and actually clean up the downtown east side and make that part of Vancouver actually safe to live in?

    If anyone believes the NDP will actually do that,
    well I have a retired BC Ferry in Port Alberni to sell you.

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    And who believes...

    ....that changing the questions asked to create a red herring is anything more than a desperate attempt to avoid answering? We all do. I mean really."ICBC isn't raising insurance rates, and just how low are insurance rates supposed to go?" The rates were suppose to reflect claims. If people drove more safely the people would get the benefit. It was never designed to be used as a cash cow every time the government gets into to trouble. Even so giving it back in lower rates is one hell of lot better, does does more for the economy than giving it to the banks and all those other Campbell buddies he's going to give it top.

    You know BC Boy you should really bowing to the Campbell icon and you might see the light. Defending liars and thieves and sleezy ways of shifting costs can't be much fun. I still say to do what you do, most people would demand payment from the john....oops Campbell.

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

    bigods!

    beggars the imagination that the bloody Boche cannot muster even one champion! Pip pip and all that! We'll show the barbarian Hun whatfor, eh wot?!

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    what to believe from opinion artists

    "....that changing the questions asked to create a red herring is anything more than a desperate attempt to avoid answering? We all do. I mean really."ICBC isn't raising insurance rates, and just how low are insurance rates supposed to go?" The rates were suppose to reflect claims."

    partially. Less claims mean less outlay from the insurance carrier, but there are costs of administration etc. Very low claims doesn't mean
    a huge reduction in what is paid out. Insurance is
    also risk. So you wouldn't see a return to $25.00
    to $250.00 a year insurance.

    " If people drove more safely the people would get the benefit."

    Finally. True, but many people do not drive safely
    and those accidents cost insurance carriers money.

    "It was never designed to be used as a cash cow every time the government gets into to trouble."

    ICBC also doesn't show a profit either. it's never
    been a 'cash cow' for the government. Was it magically during the NDP's time?

    "Even so giving it back in lower rates is one hell of lot better, does does more for the economy than giving it to the banks and all those other Campbell buddies he's going to give it top."

    Again, the rates are pretty much as low as they are
    going to get. Insurance is risk, and even the good drivers have to pay their share. There also has to be reserves in place for those times when accident claims do go up. But that difference between what is kept and what there is now, why not transfer it over to the government for paying for other things
    when the excessive reserve isn't needed?

    If insurance rates go very low now, those same whiners who want lower rates will scream loudly when the rates have to rise because of increased accident claims. A no win situation. Rates an only go so low.

    "You know BC Boy you should really bowing to the Campbell icon and you might see the light."

    Sorry, not about to do that. There's no value in it.

    "Defending liars and thieves and sleezy ways of shifting costs can't be much fun."

    Certainly as much fun as defending the NDP during the times of the Commonwealth Holding Society, the
    antics of Glen Clark and the NDP who went through
    4 leaders in 10 years.

    "I still say to do what you do, most people would demand payment from the john....oops Campbell."

    Need to apply for that arts grant. There's real
    potential here. A real comedy act in the making.

    Show the talent by joing the protest movement comprised of Mimes at the Legislature. practice with the Mimes on the ferry.

  • Takuan

    1 year ago

    harrumph!

    come a cropper at the first fence! Any o you younguns remember when ICBC rates first tripled under the Socred/lieberal lash? I do.

  • Yammer

    1 year ago

    I believe in public art

    I am totally behind governments spending coin on public decorations, the neat stuff (e.g. the new EastVan cross, love that) that helps make urban living more, uh, livable, since otherwise we would just be staring at bare concrete.

    The harder thing to evaluate is the cost/benefit of underwriting artists. Is the criterion that you expect them to someday break even, or is it that there is merit in just having them develop their skills? If the latter, how much funds should be given, to whom, and on what basis? Is there fairness, transparency, logic? Does the arts czar dole out the largesse based on gut feeling? Or on the basis of resume, thereby shutting out newbie artists and those who will never ever be commercial? Or should such pure experimentation be properly in the realm of the art educators?

    Until those questions get answered, I don't see any evidence against (or for) the amount that the government decided to give out.

  • getting it

    1 year ago

    With the winter we had and

    With the winter we had and our rates being a reflection of the claims, there is no way our basic insurance should not come down.We had no snow to speak of so claims had to have fallen.So piss off and give us the one break we earned you thieves.EDITED -- TYEE MODERATOR

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    Campbell's boy lap dog

    You really must become more current. The issue of NCHS went to court and only because Harcourt made a decisions to search for the truth. One person was found guilty. So lets see the results of Basi Virk. Nobody in the liberal government has done anything but stonewall. Please spare us the sanctimonious responses. Glen Clark went to court and was exonerated. Fudged Budget? It went to court and ruling said no it wasn't. Had you folks not gone to court it might still be an issue. We still need to get to court decision on Basi Virk. You will still bend over for Gordon.

    As for your comment "Again, the rates are pretty much as low as they are going to get". Probably as long as Campbell is trying to make the competition in the private sector profitable, you are probably right. You believe that is right? But there's a change a coming.

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    Anybody notice

    How the picture above looks like that TV evangelist from a bygone era? What was his name. He wasn't big on the arts either.

  • Ayla

    1 year ago

    My heart goes out to the arts community.

    Yes Gordon did win his election fairly, by present standards, but...

    Krueger is in the wrong portfolio!

    There will be some winners, such as the Vancouver Art Gallery, and many losers, such as recent graduates of arts schools from various parts of the Province (Langara's Studio 58, for instance).

    With all of the new restraint, I don't think that the NDP would have been any more generous; You can't be with budget bungling that has been going on.

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    Now here is a wierd comment.

    "With all of the new restraint, I don't think that the NDP would have been any more generous; You can't be with budget bungling that has been going on." So because the liberals bungled the budget the NDP would do no different ...get this... if they were in office, which they aren't. So folks this is all the NDP's fault!. It's obvious....beam me up Scotty, puleeeze.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    As current as you want, but history is there

    "You really must become more current. "

    Can be. Right up to the previous hour, but that means forwarding research which is a waste of time
    for some folks to see as their minds are already made up.

    "The issue of NCHS went to court and only because Harcourt made a decisions to search for the truth."

    Sure. And why didn't Barrett or Skelly when that
    was manifesting itself even back then?

    "One person was found guilty."

    Indeed. A former NDP Minister no doubt.

    "So lets see the results of Basi Virk. Nobody in the liberal government has done anything but stonewall."

    I'd like to see both of them have their chequing accounts cleaned out as a result of the outcome
    of the trial, plus if it is applicable, a bit of
    jail time, but that's up to the courts decide what
    sentence is brought down.

    "We still need to get to court decision on Basi Virk. You will still bend over for Gordon. "

    Not on your best day, pal. Defiantly not on this
    issue. I've told a BC Liberal MLA friend or two
    that don't expect any sympathy from me on this one.

    "As for your comment "Again, the rates are pretty much as low as they are going to get". Probably as long as Campbell is trying to make the competition in the private sector profitable, you are probably right. You believe that is right?

    So what would be wrong with a little competition?
    If it brings down insurance as a result of offering
    premiums for good drivers, so what? If I can get
    a better deal on my insurance (basic and comprehensive/collison) from a private insurer over
    Icky Bicky, I certainly wouldn't use Icky Bicky, but the private insurers will have to come up with
    a better efficient scheme for handling claims than
    ICBC currently does to justfy the lower premiums
    offered. The private insurers who offer the optional insurance do not have a good claims system
    in place according to a friend who has been in
    the insurance biz for over 25 years.

    But there's a change a coming.

    Won't happen until 2013.

    Be there when it happens. Better yet, start now
    with your volunteering each month (an evening a month) for the NDP. They need your help.

    and in the meantime, practice practice practice your mime contribution to the protest of the arts funding led by the Mimes.

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    Boy you have swallowed the liberal/socred line

    Desperately trying to rewrite history. Do you even know what you are talking about?
    "Sure. And why didn't Barrett or Skelly when that
    was manifesting itself even back then?" Whatever are you smoking. The issue broke in the 90's and as you say it involved a "former"and you forget it went to court and there was a ruling. The facts, my friend the facts. Pity you guys were so eager to take it all to court. What fun you might have had except that court ruled and stole you "ammunition" more than once I'd say.

    Given your defense of all the blunders of the Campbell Gang and dragging things from the NDP almost 30 years ago definitely points to the fact that you are "bending over for Campbell" at every turn. Your comment to your Liberal MLA friend is just empty threats as proven here.

    "So what would be wrong with a little competition?" nothing unless the Liberals are deliberately increasing the cost of the public option to help the private. And Boy that is exactly what they are doing. Hansen as much as said it on the CBC. You just don't like hearing these things. Bending over already.

    Even good drivers will pay more. Private insurance requires a profit margin. Public Insurance gives the profit to the insured. At least it should unless you happen to be a Campbell fan or a fool. We had private insurance and ICBC provided better and lower. You don't remember do you? No, you listen to someone in the insurance biz. Gullible? Ideology trumps common sense does it..

    But there's a change a coming and regurgitating Luke's old methods (copy and paste) won't help you.

  • G West

    1 year ago

    Skywalker

    Bit of advice - friendly like...I think you'd be better to ignore him.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    "Desperately trying to

    "Desperately trying to rewrite history. Do you even know what you are talking about?
    "Sure. And why didn't Barrett or Skelly when that
    was manifesting itself even back then?" Whatever are you smoking. The issue broke in the 90's "

    Broke in the 90's but the circumstances were reported to be going back to the early 1980's as
    the NDP used the Commonwealth Holding Society to
    manifest money that was eventually transferred to
    NDP riding associations for their campaigns. That
    is fact.

    "and as you say it involved a "former"and you forget it went to court and there was a ruling. The facts, my friend the facts. Pity you guys were so eager to take it all to court. What fun you might have had except that court ruled and stole you "ammunition" more than once I'd say."

    Not really. But nice try though.

    "Given your defense of all the blunders of the Campbell Gang and dragging things from the NDP almost 30 years ago definitely points to the fact that you are "bending over for Campbell" at every turn."

    Do I ahve to outline the blunders of the Campbell
    government. There are many the public doesn't see
    and not really going to get into.

    " Your comment to your Liberal MLA friend is just empty threats as proven here."

    To you maybe, not to him/her.

    "So what would be wrong with a little competition?" nothing unless the Liberals are deliberately increasing the cost of the public option to help the private."

    Are they? Any specific evidence? The transfering
    of built up revenues is hardly a manifestation of
    that fact.

    "And Boy that is exactly what they are doing. Hansen as much as said it on the CBC."

    He said the additional reserves are being transferred from ICBC (Crown Corporation) to general revenue, he did not say anything about
    enhancing private insurance carriers being able
    to compete 100% against ICBC.

  • G West

    1 year ago

    Excellent points Skywalker

    And it isn't only you who noticed this clear reach around to private insurers. It's too bad some people (you know who I mean) come here for entertainment instead of looking around at the rest of the world.

    http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/86286007.html

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    BC Boy and his selective memory

    I probably should ignore him but he's funny.

    He must get all his news from Canwest and no wonder he still thinks there is something normal about bleeding the ICBC reserves and propping up general revenue as well as that Hanson did not say anything about
    enhancing the competition to ICBC.

    The CBC carried the story and the intent was clear. It was using ICBC as a cash cow and making it easier for private insurers to compete. Some of us listen to what is said and hear it all, not just what we read from the PAB.

    The problem with BC (Campbell) Boy type liberals during the 90's was that instead of holding their ammunition for political purposes, they had their puppets take stuff to court. That included NCHS, Fudged Budget, A deck and all of them were neutered at the end of the court action. Now they want to rewrite the outcome and believe if they just repeat it often and loud enough the public is dumb enough not to see through the farce.

    Only some my Boy, only some!

    G West, you ever wonder why all the increases in MSP?

  • G West

    1 year ago

    MSP increases

    At least partly to pay for the profiteering P3s...and, because it doesn't 'look' like a tax increase.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    Skywalker and his cadet GWest are funny

    "I probably should ignore him but he's funny."

    That's a funny statement in itself. Obviously the
    previous poster can't think internally.

    "He must get all his news from Canwest and no wonder he still thinks there is something normal about bleeding the ICBC reserves and propping up general revenue as well as that Hanson did not say anything about enhancing the competition to ICBC."

    Well it is a Crown Corporation, a branch of the provincial government. The NDP set that up, remember?

    And just how low are optional rates supposed to go?
    have a figure? And no I don't rely on Canwest for
    news 100% of the time. The talent is amazing though. Apply for an arts grant and develop that psychic power. The NDP could use it.

    "The CBC carried the story and the intent was clear. It was using ICBC as a cash cow and making it easier for private insurers to compete."

    Again, technically wrong. But if the private carriers compete for optional insurance, so what?

    We still have to buy the basic insurance and complete vehicle registration and renwals through Icky Bicky.

    "Some of us listen to what is said and hear it all, not just what we read from the PAB."

    or the propaganda department of the NDP Caucus.

    "The problem with BC (Campbell) Boy type liberals during the 90's was that instead of holding their ammunition for political purposes, they had their puppets take stuff to court. That included NCHS, Fudged Budget, A deck and all of them were neutered at the end of the court action."

    It wasn't the BC Liberals that took the CHS to court. it was manifested internally by an NDP suppporter in Nanaimo who saw the fallicy of Stupich's creativity. Re read the history.

    " Now they want to rewrite the outcome and believe if they just repeat it often and loud enough the public is dumb enough not to see through the farce. "

    Like the NDP will when they return to office in 2013? If the previous posters think the NDP will
    be a very nice government, catering to anyone and everyone and not having one major error within their term(s) after 2013, they are sadly mistaken.

    But to ensure an NDP government, start volunteering today and also take out a membership
    and get involved.

    Who knows maybe the talents can be developed in the meantime with the aid of an arts grant.

    and be sure to renew your car insurance now before the HST arrives.

  • G West

    1 year ago

    Like I said

    Just ignore him.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    GWest ignore him,

    Ignore GWest.

    He's obviously working within the NDP.

    be sure to apply for that arts grant. You have a good future ahead in live comedy theatre, but the act needs alot of work.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    and hey if the comedy act doesn't work out, there's the NDP

    "Like I said
    Just ignore him."

    Lots of potential there for leadership.

    the NDP is going to need alot people to lead cavassing in a riding.

    Shown at the top is a quote from someone who has alot of potential to be the lead in that role.

    or perhaps maybe a lead in a local effort to recruit supporters for a contender for the NDP leadership.

    Adrian Dix needs your help!

  • Frank

    1 year ago

    Skywalker and GWest

    Reading a BC Boy post is like necrophilia. You did all the work and if you got anything out of it you probably need a great deal of help.

  • G West

    1 year ago

    @Frank

    Now that is funny!

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    I love it Frank.

    He actually remind me of Luke...you know, the copy and paste debater. He could never quite stick to the subject either.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    GWest and Skywalker are comdy

    Looks like we have a comedy duo. Trying to do dialogue with each other on an opinion column.

    For the past while they have been critical, but not staying on the original topic - arts funding.

    They'll be a real class act at the next NDP Convention, provided they work on the act funded by an arts grant.

    Just simply the best fit for the NDP too. Always critical and nothing original nor innovative.

    and GW? Gets worked up over the smallest things.

    Oh well. Enjoy the NDP kids. They definately need all the help they can get.

  • G West

    1 year ago

    Hmm

    comdy(sic)....?

    definately(sic)...?

    Interesting - but unintelligible.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    GWest itoo serious

    "comdy(sic)....?

    comedy, boy, comedy. As in GW's content which he
    takes seriously but few others do.

    "Interesting - but unintelligible."

    Like GW's constant posts?

    Never sweat the small stuff in politics, son. There's bigger challenges for supporters of the NDP
    ahead.

    Get in on it, and work that riding!

  • alive

    1 year ago

    escaped from where?

    All right GWest, you can be difficult at times, but where the hell did that BC boy come from?
    This is the bottom, of the barrel, total waste of time reading his crap.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    If you don't like it, don't read it

    "All right GWest, you can be difficult at times, but where the hell did that BC boy come from?"

    From the same region he does, the Lower Mainland.

    This Tyee isn't exclusive to NDPers. Not by a long shot. You have the NDP's Democrat newspaper to write to (if that still exists).

    "This is the bottom, of the barrel, total waste of time reading his crap"

    Glad you agree about GWest's contributions.

    But why waste the time with this? Get out there and support the NDP. Writing crap into an opinion column for a third level internet news medium isn't going to mean any success for the NDP.

    Go and support the NDP, and while you're at it,
    think seriously of supporting Adrian Dix for leader.

    Get on it and work your own NDP riding!

    and don't take these opinion columns so seriously.

    They're just entertainment. Not serious reading.

  • BDD63

    1 year ago

    BC Boy

    The "Boy" in your name must refer not so much to your age as your debating skills. Why not just say "I know you are but what am I?" and have done with it.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    Debating skills? In an opinion column? Surely you jest!

    Debating skills?? In an opinion column?? Surely the previous poster is joking.

    One only has to look at a few posters and their debating skills wouldn't make it through the first two minutes in a real debating contest.

    In the Tyee's opinion columns like those in the mainstream paper are just a landfill dump for those who are "frustrated" with how the current things are and yet have yet to come up with real workable solutions rather than playing psychic and
    figuring they "know" a person.

    In the menatime, one has to wonder just how many of the posters who whine and complain have actually
    worked to help the NDP get elected last May?

    The NDP had a good chance to become government in the last election.

    Face the fcts, kids. The NDP blew the chance because they didn't have anything real to offer the voters.

    Would an NDP government be the best government around?

    Not a chance. Even they wouldn't be able to cater to everyone's wishes.

    So if you disagree, get going and volunteer for the NDP. Replace their bland leader with one the voters can actually support, and work those policies.

    Writing into an opinion column for a third level internet news medium isn't going to get anyone elected.

  • Fiat lux

    1 year ago

    BC Boy.....Have you been on

    BC Boy.....Have you been on this list under several other names before? How long have you been here under this present name?

    The propaganda you're pushing looks very familiar to what appeared on this list under other, various, and now long gone names, who seem to come up for a few weeks, then disappear, with new names, with the same message taking their place.

    An old trick of all dictatorships pretending to be democracies, representing the public.

    A long known propaganda gimmick, used where and when the use of phony names, long discarded by the printed media, is permitted.

    Then, of course, we have the professional letter writers, who feed prepared texts to the faithful and also the contact lists of names to vote on so called "opinion polls" in the various media.

    The Reform Party was great on this, still carrying on under its present various, phony names, like the BC Liberals, or federal Conservatives.

    Reminds me of the People's Democracies of the Soviet satellites, now taken over by the international corporate mafia, collectivizing and destroying real private enterprise, colonizing and enslaving billions under the guise of "free enterprise", "free trade" and "wealth creating global competitiveness" , while raising the prices in the stores every day.

    And always under the propaganda blanket of "freedom"

    Ed Deak, Big Lake.

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    Same old same old, eh G West..

    It is like necrophilia all right. You wonder why the constant, "Writing into an opinion column for a third level internet news medium". Wow, a "third level internet news medium". Wonder why he spends all his time here if that's what he thinks. There must be something about the Tyee that worries some people.

  • G West

    1 year ago

    Lower Mainland????

    NO!

    Can't even get that right.

    Are you sure you know where you're from?

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    GW..

    "NO!

    Can't even get that right.

    Are you sure you know where you're from?"

    Did you ever finish Grade 10, pal?

    (one dumb quetion lead to another, folks)

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    Ed led

    "BC Boy.....Have you been on this list under several other names before? How long have you been here under this present name? "

    About two weeks, and nothing before that.

    "The propaganda you're pushing looks very familiar to what appeared on this list under other, various, and now long gone names, who seem to come up for a few weeks, then disappear, with new names, with the same message taking their place."

    Ed must have had one too many Pepsis.

    "An old trick of all dictatorships pretending to be democracies, representing the public."

    and that applies to Canada and British Columbia how?

    "A long known propaganda gimmick, used where and when the use of phony names, long discarded by the printed media, is permitted."

    Is your name real?

    "Then, of course, we have the professional letter writers, who feed prepared texts to the faithful and also the contact lists of names to vote on so called "opinion polls" in the various media."

    Sure. tell that to the Centre for Policy Alternatives and also the Fraser Institute. Political opposites, but the same thing basically.

    "The Reform Party was great on this, still carrying on under its present various, phony names, like the BC Liberals, or federal Conservatives. "

    The Reform Party was never part of the BC Liberal
    Party and vice versa.

    "Reminds me of the People's Democracies of the Soviet satellites, now taken over by the international corporate mafia, collectivizing and destroying real private enterprise, colonizing and enslaving billions under the guise of "free enterprise", "free trade" and "wealth creating global competitiveness" , while raising the prices in the stores every day. "

    Doesn't make much sense there. The Soviet Union
    collapsed under its own collective weight after Gorbachev recsinded the Brezhnev Doctrine which did not allow republics or Easter Bloc countries to break way from communism.

    And always under the propaganda blanket of "freedom"

    Ed Deak, Big Lake.

    Ed Deak. Big deal.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    and if GWest is supposed to be debate leader here, wow.

    and if GWest is supposed to be the debate leader here, as purported by this:

    "
    Same old same old, eh G West.."

    Wow. This is really bad. Has this GWest person actually done any real political work other than screech to the Tyee daily?

    A guy like that is what the NDP really needs.

    All talk and very little benificial action. No wonder the NDP hasn't gone anywhere.

    He should try for a job at Adrian Dix's office.

    Might get him into the real world of politics.

  • Fiat lux

    1 year ago

    My boy, I have 45 years of

    My boy, I have 45 years of communist fighting record, with guns, but mostly as a propaganda buster and, as a dedicated private enterpriser, now spending the rest of my days fighting their idiot twins , the international capitalist collectivizer corporate mafia.

    The BCLiberals and Reform, then CRAPP and now the Conservatives are from the same origin, the Socreds. When the Socred party collapsed, their financiers bought the BC Liberal Party for Campbell, an obvious former Socred, as were Manning and Harper.

    The more things change, the more they remain under the control of the same gang of predators.

    Ed Deak. You can look me up on google and in any Cariboo phone book. I don't hide like some chickenshit in the grass.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    A Fiat runs rough and smokes , if it starts.

    "My boy, I have 45 years of communist fighting record, with guns, but mostly as a propaganda buster and, as a dedicated private enterpriser, now spending the rest of my days fighting their idiot twins , the international capitalist collectivizer corporate mafia."

    They are actually oppposites. the communists being
    the prolitariat and the capitalists being the bourgoise.

    If you're constantly fighting, you must be one sad person.

    "The BCLiberals and Reform, then CRAPP and now the Conservatives are from the same origin, the Socreds."

    Carole Taylor was not Socred, and neither was
    Gary Farrell Collins or Colin Hansen. They're federal Liberals. The BC Liberal Party was presided over by May Brown a prominent federal Liberal. Christy Clark was never a Socred, she was
    and is a federal Liberal. There are many federal
    Liberals within the BC Liberal Party. Not many Socreds.

    CRAPP was federal, not provincial. An offshoot of
    the federal Reeform Party. Didn't last long either,
    it was headed by Stockwell Day.

    "When the Socred party collapsed, their financiers bought the BC Liberal Party for Campbell, an obvious former Socred, as were Manning and Harper. "

    Manning was an Alberta Socred but Harper being Socred Albertan is very doubtful since the PC's
    under Lougheed were the party of the day back then.

    "The more things change, the more they remain under the control of the same gang of predators."

    predators, eh? So what does that make Tim Louis,
    and other very left wing parts of the BC NDP?

    Ed Deak. You can look me up on google and in any Cariboo phone book. I don't hide like some chickenshit in the grass

    Now, now, don't disparage Gwest there, son. he has his troubles with geography, but that will take time.

  • G West

    1 year ago

    This, you idiot, YOUR POST

    Is what I'm referring to:

    Quote:
    If you don't like it, don't read it
    "All right GWest, you can be difficult at times, but where the hell did that BC boy come from?"
    From the same region he does, the Lower Mainland.(all quoted from BC Boy quoting alive)

    I'm not from the Lower Mainland, dummy. If you'd paid any attention to what other people write here instead of spinning words like a child's top you'd know that.

    Where would you like me to sent your 'footscap' to?

  • Skywalker

    1 year ago

    An idea.

    Let's start a poll on the value, analysis of an issue, thoughtfulness etc. of the posts by BC Boy as shown on this thread. On a scale of 1-10, 1 being the equivalent of the grunting of a bull moose in rut and 10 being equivalent to the actual article by Andrew MacLeod we are suppose to be addressing. No actual comment is necessary to explain the choice. Having suggested it, I will refrain from participating lest I start a trend.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    GWest is a bit upity

    "This, you idiot, YOUR POST"

    Tsk tsk, getting a little uppity are we?

    Is what I'm referring to:

    Quote:
    If you don't like it, don't read it
    "All right GWest, you can be difficult at times, but where the hell did that BC boy come from?"
    From the same region he does, the Lower Mainland.(all quoted from BC Boy quoting alive)"

    quoting alive? What does that mean?

    I'm not from the Lower Mainland, dummy. If you'd paid any attention to what other people write here instead of spinning words like a child's top you'd know that."

    And where exactly where was it mentioned you were from, genius? It doesn't matter really, does it?

    "Where would you like me to sent your 'footscap' to?"

    What NDP riding are you volunteering within? Can't be Adrian Dix as he is in Vancouver.

    Again, if you don't like what I write, don't read it. Obviously you're not using your own advice there GW.

    It's a nice day out there, get out and get some sun, son. It will do you good.

    Remember, there's 3 years of BC Liberal government left. It will be a tough slog for you, but you'll
    do it, you'll make it.

    After that, you can look forward to your socialist
    utopia, provided that is, the voters accept the NDP as government.

    Have a good day there, GW. I must say it has been fun. Never had this much fun since watching NDP
    conventioneers get mad at Social Credit governments and try to pass policy during 'emergency debates' that would actually work and do something for the people.

  • BC Boy

    1 year ago

    Skywalker never left grade school

    Let's start a poll on the value, analysis of an issue, thoughtfulness etc. of the posts by BC Boy as shown on this thread. On a scale of 1-10, 1 being the equivalent of the grunting of a bull moose in rut and 10 being equivalent to the actual article by Andrew MacLeod we are suppose to be addressing.

    I'll start. Let's dump Skywalker's elementary grade school rhetoric and get back on topic shall we?

    It is about arts grants, not fighting communists, nor Socred demons or a party affilation.

    But if Skywalker lives in an opinion column as he does with his previous post, that's his choice.

    Have fun with it kids.

    and play nice.

  • SharingIsGood

    1 year ago

    The topic

    I think that BC Boy has done a fantstic job of sidetracking the discussions away from the article. The article speaks to the funding cuts to the arts by the BC Liberals.

    Even when involved with sidetracked discussions like the BC Liberals stealing $600,000,000 from ICBC profits (profits which we, the citizens own, because we own ICBC) and placing those moneys in general revenues, BC Boy only talks to half of the issue and then immediately goes on an attack of the NDP, citing what Barrett might have done. Dave Barrett hasn't been premier for 35 years!

    We have had the BC Liberals, under Campbell, running this province for nearly 10 years now. The BC Liberals must stand on their own record. Everything that has happened in this province over the last 10 years is theirs to wear.

    Personally, I belong to no political party, but anybody that seems to defend this BC Liberal government's every action is a fool. They have abdicated responsibility to the environment to big business. They have abdicated their responsibility to BC's children, old, infirm and weak to the streets. Their actions continually support the needs of international corporations and well-connected construction companies at the expense of the poor , the working class and the middle class. They give exorbinant deals/rights to international corporations as though they are persons of royalty while reducing services, and increasing taxes and user fees for the average Janes and Joes.

    I don't remember who it was that recently said something to the effect: Anytime you have a hierachical structure (be it a business, government, or non-profit charity) sooner or later sociopaths will see this as an opportunity for them to take more than their share. Ed Deak has talked around this idea countless times, though I don't know if he ever used these words. You see, BC Boy, the communists and the capitalists are all the same if you get sociopaths running things. Metaphorically, under capitalism, we have let the foxes have control of the henhouses, and they are eating chicken while giving fewer and fewer eggs to the people caring for the farm.

  • Fiat lux

    1 year ago

    Boy....There's never been a

    Boy....There's never been a worst layer of bourgeoisie than under communism, who now are the biggest Russian capitalists and also in their former satellites.

    Propaganda is not history and you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

    When it comes to funding of the arts, the commies and nazis were the greatest....provided the arts fitted their warped ideologies. And I have been there and have seen them both at work.

    Basically the same as we now have under capitalism, the worst case barbarian collectivizers, nothing to do with real private enterprise.

    Artists and the family farm are among the oldest forms of private enterprise, that's why the capitalists are working on to wipe out both.

    Ed Deak.

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    Editors

    There's a thread going to waste here. A reminder would be in order.

  • G West

    1 year ago

    I don't live in the lower mainland!

    How much clearer can I be.

    And, zalm, you're right - I apologize.

  • David Beers

    1 year ago

    Administrator

    BC Boy yours is troll behaviour, GWest, you are rewarding it

    Both of you stop or face being blocked.

  • sdgreen

    1 year ago

    Arts Funding: There is a Limit!

    I have no problem with the Government Federal / Provincial in funding Arts facilities investment, operation and maintenance. I have no problem with Governments at all levels to commission art works for public projects.

    I do have a problem with governments using tax dollars in directly funding artists. Artists are receiving huge dollars from all levels of government and are receiving tax incentives to further their life style. Further some segments of the artistic community are receiving (or suppose to receive) royalty payments from collectives who are imposing levies on CD's, Tapes, memory media, and radio stations, schools and any other part of society that uses their material.

    The question for me is how much taxpayer dollars should be provided? Right now I think there is too much.

  • Fiat lux

    1 year ago

    SD.....I'm an artist, have

    SD.....I'm an artist, have been one in BC since 1955, and have never received a penny from any government and don't know anybody who has ?

    Where did you get your information on this?

    As a matter of fact, our local, Williams Lake artist owned Station House Gallery is in dire financial situation on account of the lottery funds having been cut back drastically.

    My wife and I have offered to put on an exhibition in 2012, when some of our work will be donated to the Williams Lake Museum and the rest, probably up to 20 paintings, to the gallery, without any payments to us.

    Somebody has to stand up to these braindead barbarians and try to save whatever culture is left under these criminal economic times, stealing from everybody to feed the aristocracy.

    By the way, profits are taxation without representation.

    When corporations donate to certain projects, it all comes out of the public's pockets, exactly the same way as from government taxation.

    Ed Deak,

  • John Greg

    1 year ago

    sdgreen ...

    1.

    Quote:
    I do have a problem with governments using tax dollars in directly funding artists.

    Can you give some examples please?

    2.

    Quote:
    Artists are receiving huge dollars from all levels of government and are receiving tax incentives to further their life style.

    Can you give some examples please?

    3.

    Quote:
    Further some segments of the artistic community are receiving (or suppose to receive) royalty payments from collectives who are imposing levies on CD's, Tapes, memory media, and radio stations, schools and any other part of society that uses their material.

    Can you give some examples please?

    4.

    Quote:
    The question for me is how much taxpayer dollars should be provided? Right now I think there is too much.

    Can you give some examples please?

  • G West

    1 year ago

    Thanks John Greg

    The silence, as they say, is deafening.

    The fact simply is that arts funding was slashed cruelly and irresponsibly in 2009 - to a largely negative public reaction. Hansen’s budget does not restore funding to pre-2009 levels but makes some pusillanimous attempt(s) at giving the 'impression' that it has.

    Furthermore, by conflating arts funding with sports funding and the fiction of 2010 legacy effects the government further plays fast and loose with the facts in another of its patented attempts to somehow play piggy back on the recent two week 'binge' of flag-waving and beer-fueled Olympic euphoria.

  • harriethedgehog

    1 year ago

    Krueger unsuitability and VAG

    Kevin Krueger is utterly unsuited to his portfolio, has no understanding of the arts and to lump arts and sports together is ridiculous!
    50 million for the VAG to build on expensive real estate is in the current economic climate unwise, it reeks of elitism. I think the VAG could use their current space much more efficiently. Their galleries are huge, way bigger than for example the National Gallery in Britain. One could play a hockey game between their wall display space! I think they could double their display capacity by standing walls for exhibits in the huge galleries. The room heights would still give the sense of space that is good.
    I haven't seen an 'installation' exhibit there but walls can be built to be movable. My guess is that Campbell, if he even cares, prefers the fancy flagship VAG to funding arts around the province through the BC Arts Council; a much too democratic organization for Gord anyway.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.