News

A Tyee Series

Sustainable, but Too Small?

Demand for eco-certified wood is growing worldwide. Small-scale foresters want in, but need to be creative.

By Colleen Kimmett, 15 Sep 2009, TheTyee.ca

rod-krimmer-in-forest.jpg

Rod Krimmer on his woodlot, east of Williams Lake. Photo by Colleen Kimmett.

Related

Rod Krimmer moves through the forest undergrowth with long, confident strides that make him seem perfectly at home here. Graceful, even, compared to my awkward gait. Clutching a camera in one hand, a notebook in the other, I clamber over a fallen trunk to catch up.

I'm on a tour of his 638-hectare woodlot, and he wants to show me the calling card of the bark beetle that has plagued his forest; brown, woody dust that indicates the pest has bored its way into the tree's core. It's a bad sign, but if he's vigilant and catches these trees early, the lumber is still salvageable. Forest management decisions these days, he tells me, are usually made "with a chainsaw in hand when you're on the ground."

Figuring his hands-on and holistic approach to forest management was in line with FSC standards anyway, Krimmer decided to become certified in 2000. With the official stamp of approval, he would reap the benefits of a growing market for sustainable wood. Right?

Wrong. "There is certainly not the demand that I'd hoped," says Krimmer. "I don't believe we're getting enough demand to justify administration costs." Next year when his own certificate expires, he might just let it go.

Operators like him are in a difficult position, says Krimmer -- too small to small to fill large orders in the global market and unable to find a local demand for green lumber. Is it just a matter of finding the right niche?

An FSC pioneer

According to the Forest Stewardship Council of Canada, a quarter of the world's FSC certified forests are in Canada. British Columbia boasts 1,869,271 hectares of FSC, and most of it (1,780,216 hectars) is owned by Tembec.

The rest is split between small operations; woodlot and tree farm licensees and community forests. Krimmer is one of just two FSC-certified woodlot owners in the province.

He helped draft the FSC standards for British Columbia before it was introduced in the 1990s, and he believes it is the best measure of sustainable forestry. Although he says the certification process (which cost $2,000 to $5,000 and requires annual audits) is not particularly onerous, he just isn't seeing any payback.

Krimmer mills about 20 per cent of his wood in his own shop, to fill small orders for a beam or a post here and there, and the rest he sells to local mills. Most "don't know or care" that it's FSC certified, says Krimmer.

"It's just going into their lumber yard. There is no tracking at all. There's no difference in demand," he explains, bristling at the thought. "It's just fibre to them."

"And when you find a good solid demand for [FSC lumber], it's for huge volumes," Krimmer continues. "They want a container full, and they want it in England or Japan or the United States." Not only that, but large-volume customers are also frequently looking for high-quality wood.

"What I have to do to meet an order like that is go out and take my very best trees, and basically cream the woodlot license to make one order. The client doesn't realize that that is really counter to FSC forest management," says Krimmer.

A creative approach in Ontario

One group of woodlot owners in Ontario is trying to get around this problem of supply and demand.

The Eastern Ontario Model Forest (EOMF) is a collection of 100 individual woodlot owners and five community forests. Together, they own 100,000 acres, or roughly 40,000 hectares, all of which is FSC certified.

Scott Davis, who co-ordinated the certification process, says there were only 20 woodlots in the program when it launched in 1999. FSC certified wood was "non-existent" in Canada at that time, says Davis, and the group wanted to test the process, and see if certification was a good framework for sustainable forestry.

Though he acknowledges that "it probably costs more energy and effort to implement sustainable forestry than it would not," Davis says that members have seen benefits. They have a better sense of the value of their wood, for one thing, and members have gone from selling firewood to collectively filling lumber orders for tens of thousands of board feet. The EOMF also markets non-timber forest products, like maple syrup, says Davis.

Though it's still relative small-scale, "now that we're accumulating a decent amount of acres, we're able to accommodate some of those larger requests," says Davis.

'Best for the local economy is huge'

Steve Roscoe, president of Woodland Flooring and Millwork in the Comox Valley, says he's looking for green suppliers, but not necessarily FSC-certified ones.

Roscoe says about a quarter of what they sell is FSC certified, but sourcing local, salvaged and beetle-killed wood is more important for him.

"Doing the best for the local economy -- local employment from local wood -- is just so huge and I can't stress that enough," says Roscoe.

Woodland supplies a certificate of origin for all of their products, that tells clients if the wood came from a salvaged Douglas Fir, for example, or a beetle-killed pine. Being able to work more closely with woodlot owners means they can tailor their needs, adds Roscoe.

"Our whole forest industry has been stuck in the [mass] commodity [mindset] for so many years that they just don't know how to do specialty products. But really, we have an abundance of raw material here in B.C. to work with."

Build your own eco-certified cabin

Krimmer is trying to take the best advantage of his raw material by adding a value-added component to his products. He is attempting to raise his profile (and make use of his fir, a mid-grade wood) with ready-to-assemble, 100 per cent FSC-certified dwellings. His kits come with fir panels that fit together to make a hexagon-shaped cabin, similar to a yurt. Krimmer has had some success; one of his cabins is being used for a classroom at a forestry camp.

"It seems demand has to come from fairly established businesses, or I try and market my little cabins and try and build the FSC market myself," says Krimmer. "Which, it's almost more than I have time to do."  [Tyee]

7  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Fiat lux

    2 years ago

    Rod is a great guy and our

    Rod is a great guy and our next door neighbour. We've known him and his wife Barb for 33 years, working their heads off to promote organic agriculture and forest sustainability.

    He's absolutely correct that nobody really gives a damn. Just as people don't give a damn for organic foods and beef. The degree of public ignorance, apathy and callousness is getting worse.

    We've just sold our cows and calves, leaving only two with two replacements for ourselves, because there's no market for organic, with the exception of a few specialty stores selling meat at outrageous, fraudulent prices, when organic beef could and should really be sold at much lower cost than the adulterated feedlot crap.

    I'll be sorry to see him giving up his FSC licence, but can fully understand anybody who get fed up with beating their heads against the wall.

    Ed Deak, Big Lake.

  • silvervalley

    2 years ago

    Apathy

    may be rampant, but don't give up on us yet, Ed.

    There are many people who admire the efforts of Rod and others of like mind, and who are making efforts of their own.

    Some, of course, do not come to fruition but, as William Shatner once said, 'the success is in the effort.' And in the pleasure of a way of life that makes sense and brings one into contact with living things in an 'I-Thou' relationship. Although I would prefer 'I-Thou-We.'

    I raise my glass to Zen & the art of woodlot management.

  • freebear

    2 years ago

    Hitting your head against the wall eventually gives a headache

    Unfortunately it seems we need an earthquake (natures re-development tool), or an economic collapse before we will redesign where and how we live!

    Whatever the government it seems the Vision is more of the same with the same unsustainable paradigms.

  • unk harry

    2 years ago

    certified wood

    We have a woodlot similar to Rob's where we harvest about sixty truckloads of logs in a good year (which this one is NOT) by a variety of cutting systems: single tree selection, group retention, strip shelterwood, and patch cuts. Our experience with certification is parallel to Rob's--it simply is not worth it. Most of the buyers are in some sort of la-la land where they want small amounts of old-growth quality wood for second-growth commodity prices. The guideline notebook is almost as thick as the Forest Service regulations, and about as useful. I guess the urban enlightened consumer wants cheap but cosmically blessed wood, just like they want cheap organic food. It is easy to become disillusioned--however neither bogus certification nor capitalism's greed will make us change the way we manage our family forest.

  • dorothy

    2 years ago

    Uh, oh, get that calcualtor checked....

    "Together, they own 100,000 acres, or about 40 hectares, all of which"

    Something slipped there, like maybe a finger?

    The wiki has it that

    "The acre is often used to express areas of land. In the metric system, the hectare is commonly used for the same purpose. An acre is approximately 40% of a hectare."

    Where can I find more info on those little cabins?

  • bigbearranch

    2 years ago

    sustainable but too small

    It is always encouraging to read about other people or families who work hard to create a harmonious and sustainable environment and leave a better place for our children. However, I totally disagree with Ed Deaks comment that these products (like his beef for instance) should be cheaper than the harmful industrial products. The problem in agriculture starts with the wrong idea that the main objective is prize (Save on Food). We have to recreate the small diversified family farm, where the manure is an asset and not an ecological desaster and where the family can make a good living. After all, they are putting in double the work hours than the average family and they bear a huge responsibility: to produce safe and nutritios food, both is not attainable in an industriell system.
    Our products should be more expensive, because they bear all the costs of production, there is no public subsidy for all the environmental problems created by CAFOs .
    And we do not even want to think about the quality of life for the animals.
    We got certified organic after already working organic for 5 years in 2004 when BSE hit and forced us to sell 230 cows to survive. We increased our sales of grass fed beef and pasture raised pork since then immensely and today cannot fulfill the demand for beef. We are convinced, that there is a huge change in public awareness and I would encourage Rod to stay certified, just to set a sign!
    Even when I know that the certified organic process is flawed (The producer pays the high fees!)and I know we surpass all of the requirements (biodynamic)we stay certified.
    Rainer Krumsiek Horsefly

  • Colleen K

    2 years ago

    re: calculator

    Yep, Dorothy, that was a slip. 100,000 acres is roughly 40,000 hectares, not 40.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.