News

Polar Bears to Dog Candidates

Army in fuzzy suits led by oil sands activist.

By Tom Barrett, 21 Feb 2008, TheTyee.ca

Polar Bear

'Arctic Front' launches from BC.

Raising an army of polar bears turns out to be more difficult than Kevin Grandia thought.

Technically, Grandia's army of polar bears is not an army of polar bears. It's an army of people in polar bear suits. Which is the problem -- try finding enough polar bear suits to outfit an army.

After digging around a bit, though, Grandia thinks he has enough suits to launch his army -- and they're going after Canada's politicians.

"The organization's called the Arctic Front," says Grandia. "It's an army of polar bears."

Being polar bears, Grandia's troops are concerned about climate change and, specifically, the environmental impacts of developing the Alberta oil sands.

And they're not prepared to go with the floe.

Fur may fly

For tactical reasons, some details about the army are classified information. Like how many bears he's got and exactly when they plan to take on the politicians.

"An undisclosed number may show up to ask candidates during the Alberta election and the federal election questions about their stances on the tar sands," is all Grandia is saying.

Grandia is manager of DeSmogBlog, a Vancouver-based group that "exists to clear the PR pollution that is clouding the science on climate change."

DeSmogBlog wants to make sure that environmental issues around the oil sands are debated during the March 3 Alberta election and in the next federal election, whenever it's called.

An army of polar bears seemed to be a good way to do that -- "a fun way that also gets the message across," says Grandia.

Because issues like climate change are so serious, he says, simply presenting a bunch of "in-your-face facts" can cause people to turn off.

"They're busy driving their kids to school and going to work, worrying about their mortgage, maybe worrying about their next paycheque and they just don't have time to deal with things of such a magnitude. People are already saturated with anxiety about so many things.

"So by coming at it in a fun way that also gets the message across, we're hoping to engage Canadians and make them aware of the issues around the tar sands and the environmental effects it's having."

Oil sands: 'dirtiest' or 'myth'?

And the issue, he says, is a serious one. As the Globe and Mail recently said, the oil sands are "one of the dirtiest fuels in the world.

"Under current conditions, extracting one barrel of synthetic crude from a mine requires roughly two to four barrels of fresh water from the nearby Athabasca River (an amount top water scientists say the river cannot sustain), along with 750 cubic feet of non-renewable natural gas and about four tonnes of tarry sand and . . . soil," the Globe wrote.

Getting oil out of the oil sands creates five times as many greenhouse gas emissions as conventional oil wells, the article said.

Still, Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach says the idea that oil sands production carries too high an environmental cost is a "myth."

Grandia plans for the Arctic Front to challenge that claim. The polar bear army hopes to exploit social networking tools, with a Facebook group, pictures on Flickr and video on YouTube.

Goofy suits: a brief history

The history of people participating in the democratic process while wearing goofy suits goes back a long way. In 1974, artist Vincent Trasov ran for mayor of Vancouver as Mr. Peanut.

Decked out in top hat, monocle and cane, and backed by the dancing Peanettes, Mr. Peanut turned up at all-candidates meetings and responded to questions by tap dancing.

He lost, despite being formally endorsed by Naked Lunch author William Burroughs, who visited Vancouver during the election and declared: "There can be only one illogical candidate -- Mr. Peanut."

More recently, Victoria's Mr. Floatie made raw sewage a top-of-mind issue before taking on a new identity as CO2 Man.

And in the U.S., presidential primary debates were enlivened last year by Billiam the Snowman –- not a guy in a suit, perhaps, but still someone with an interest in global warming.

Nice bear!

So why did Grandia choose to recruit polar bears?

"Polar bears, they're an iconic image of Canada," he says. "They're big, mean, aggressive, but they also have that soft image to them as well. It's a popular image . . . . It's an easy way to quickly communicate the issue."

The problem, it turned out, was finding bear suits in bulk.

"You've got to be kind of resourceful," he says. "I found a lady down in the U.S. who makes them, so we're getting most of them from there. And I picked up a couple on EBay here and there."

Finding "open, friendly, approachable," bear suits was a challenge, he says.

"Some of them were pretty freaky. There are some scary polar bears out there."

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

4  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • alda

    4 years ago

    Whatever works

    Personally speaking, I find such antics childish, and thus, as a citizen opposed to tar sands expansion, I would never join such a group.

    However, as it has now become obvious to environmentalists such as Suzuki and those at Bali that approaching our politicinas in a rational, wise, logical, and respectful manner has about as much effect as yelling into the ears of dead men (and they are surely that in their souls), I guess this kind of tactic is what we're left with--lowering ourselves to the lowest common denominators, approaching our politicians in the manner they understand best: that is, juvenile, foolish, and tragically comic.

  • earthpro

    4 years ago

    Freaks!

    It is too bad that after finding enough suits for this 'army' that they could actually find enough uneducated people to fill them! My personal beliefs about the global warming scam - http://earthpro.info

  • alda

    4 years ago

    Invisible damage

    Are the miles and miles of boreal forests that have been turned into toxic swamps due to tar sands production, and the gooey, poisonous ponds held in by precarious, leaking Katrina-like levees against the Athabasca and other river systems of the North "a scam," too? I think not.

    Just because you can't "see" CO2 damage and manmade atmospheric warming with the naked eye as you go about living your life doesn't mean it isn't REAL; it only means that it can never be proven to someone who only learns lessons the hard way: by firsthand experience. (It reminds me of people who refuse to believe that smoking causes cancer until they're sucking their very last breath through an esophagal tube and an oxygen tank.)

  • mopled

    4 years ago

    Too Much Ice: Polar Bears Starving

    http://web.mac.com/sinfonia1/iWeb/Global%20Warming%20Politics/A%20Hot%20Topic%20Blog/B609A513-8AB3-4587-BE0E-D4F0A10D9C03.html

    "according to a report [‘Hat Tip’ to Marc Morano], Svend Erik Hendriksen, a certified weather observer in the Kangerlussuaq Greenland MET Office, who is responsible for all the weather observations at Kangerlussuaq Airport (near to Sisimiut), says that the cause is too much sea ice:

    “Several polar bears located (at least 6) close to Sisimiut town on the West coast ...Too much sea ice, so they are very hungry...Error number 36 in the movie An Inconvenient Truth Al Gore says the polar bear need more ice to survive... Now we have a lot of ice, but the polar bear is starving and find their food at the garbage dumps in towns. It's also influence the local community, polar bear alerts, keep kids away from the schools and so on.... The first one was shot at February 1st.”

    There is no damage from higher CO2 levels.
    There is only more plant growth and increased drought tolerance. CO2can't change climate because there isn't enough of it at 0.0385% and even if there were more, it does not have the heat storage capacity necessary. Take the time to read this.
    http://www.warwickhughes.com/agri/Solar_Arch_NY_Mar2_08.pdf
    David Archibald
    International Conference on Climate Change
    March, 2008
    "Do we live in a special time in which the laws of physics and nature are suspended? No, we do not. Can we expect relationships between the Sun’s activity and climate, that we can see in data going back several hundred years, to continue for at least another 20 years? With absolute certainty.
    In this presentation, I will demonstrate that the Sun drives climate, and use that demonstrated relationship to predict the Earth’s climate to 2030. It is a prediction that differs from most in the public domain. It is a prediction of imminent cooling.
    To put the solar – climate relationship in context, we will begin by looking at the recent temperature record, and then go further back in time.
    Then we will examine the role of the Sun in changing climate, and following that the contribution of anthropogenic warming from carbon dioxide. I will show that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is not even a little bit bad. It is wholly beneficial. The more carbon dioxide we can put into the atmosphere, the better the planet will be – for humans, and all other living things"

    You are being scammed for many nefarious reasons, not the least of which is to pick your pocketas the new carbon tax demonstrates.

    I do not support tar sands development.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.