Bear Mountain Road Showdown
Protesters in trees set to clash with work crew.
Resort location.
Construction is set to start any day on a highway interchange to serve the Bear Mountain Resort and Country Club west of Victoria, but first the authorities will have to deal with protesters who've camped for a year in the area and are determined to prevent the destruction of what they say is an environmentally and archaeologically rich place.
Eight RCMP officers visited the camp on Dec. 14, writes activist Zoe Blunt in an e-mail. "We expect they will try to evict the camp either this weekend, or in the next week or two." There are five people on platforms in the trees, she writes, plus supporters on the ground. Her e-mail encourages more people to come to the site to act as witnesses.
The interchange will be used by people living both north and south of the Trans-Canada Highway, but opponents of the project say it is mostly to serve former hockey player Len Barrie's Bear Mountain development. Companies connected to Bear Mountain gave the B.C. Liberal party $1,900 last year.
Several activists, including Betty Krawczyk, who has served almost three years in jail since 1994 for charges related to several environmental actions, have said they are prepared to be arrested to prevent the Bear Mountain interchange.
Part of the proposed route is on land owned by the Provincial Capital Commission, a crown corporation dedicated to connecting British Columbians with the capital. The rest uses land the City of Langford has bought at above market rates from several homeowners.
The area includes a Garry oak meadow, a fir forest, a seasonal pond that is home to endangered red legged frogs and a limestone cave. The consulting firm Golder Associates has produced environmental and archaeological reports for what the city calls the Spencer Road Interchange, but activist Ingmar Lee claims they have failed to make a thorough examination of the area and missed some key features, including some possible culturally modified trees and a series of limestone kettles that first nations may have used for ceremonies.
Endangered frogs
Golder's geoscientist Rob Buchanan defends the firm's reports. "To be honest with you, we're doing everything that's required," he says. "There's no rubber stamp approach being given."
The firm was aware of the cave, the Garry oaks and the pond, he says, and the route was planned accordingly. "Most of the issues are outside the alignment boundaries," says Buchanan. "They're in the general area, but they're outside the alignment and any of the areas affected by the actual construction."
Plans are being adjusted as issues arise, he says, but the goal is to mitigate the impact of a project that is going ahead. "Public support seems to be more in favour of the interchange," he says. "The majority of people want it so it's moving ahead with the logical steps you would for any project."
Tsartlip left out
One group that was left out of the consultation is the Tsartlip First Nation, who consider the interchange area as part of their traditional territory. Lands manager Wendy Edwards was surprised to hear Golder had completed the archaeological assessment without contacting them.
The report says Ron Sam from the neighbouring Songhees First Nation came on the assessment and a representative of the Esquimalt First Nation was invited but could not attend. Virgil Bob also attended. The report doesn't affiliate him with a First Nation, but Edwards says she knows him and he is Pauquachin from a reserve further from the site than Tsartlip.
"I think it's really amazing how they can exclude some First Nations when we have an interest in the same area," she says. "It's just like they are doing in the B.C. treaty process."
The Tsartlip were vocal opponents of the destruction of a nearby cave last year on Spaet Mountain by the Bear Mountain developers. Edwards says the chief and council are also against expanding the highway and are considering applying for an injunction to stop the construction. "I do know Tsartlip is opposing the construction of the interchange because it is taking away very important ecological systems," she says.
The meadow, wetland, pond and cave are all part of a water course that feeds into the salmon bearing Goldstream, she says. "All these places are important, that's the first thing on the mind of the chief and council," she says. "What's going to happen in the future to our Goldstream? Goldstream is so important . . . It's our food, our ceremonies, our right."
The Goldstream runs through a provincial park.
Bunch of constraints
Transportation minister Kevin Falcon declined an interview. A ministry spokesperson says it is Langford's project and questions should be directed there.
Langford directs questions to Tim Stevens, a transportation engineer the city has contracted to manage the project. Asked if the assessment and consultation process have been thorough enough, Stevens says, "We're getting all the reports done we need to get done. If we find any entity we have to deal with, we'll deal with them." The planners moved the alignment to go around the cave, for instance, he says. "It's not like we don't want to do the right thing."
The interchange is needed, he says. "The place is growing like crazy. There's more people and more people want to drive."
The engineers looked at other options, he says, but a trailer park and a gas station are in the way of the nearest alternatives. "Where we chose to put it was the best place we could find given the constraints we have," he says. "There's a bunch of constraints out there, all of which have issues. Some are environmental and some are social. Some are money . . . The alignment that's there is the most benign we could come up with, in my view. Not everyone would necessarily agree."
That disagreement is set to become even more obvious very soon. Stevens says the city hopes to start clearing trees in January. But as activist Lee writes in an e-mail, "They've got a lot of tricky work ahead of them to dislodge the protesters, should push come to shove."
He adds, "People at the tree sits are already risking much and are putting their lives on the line by the very nature of what they are doing. The RCMP should avoid making the situation even more dangerous."
With pending legal action, protesters in the trees and others willing to be arrested, it will take a whole lot of brute force to have construction ready to go in January.
Related Tyee stories:
- First Nations Leader to Premier: Carbon Credits 'Belong to Us'
FNs not consulted on new emissions target laws: Porter. - Reconciling with First Nations (series)
How the 'New Relationship' is faring in the Fraser Valley. - The Coming Ski Resort Wars
B.C. is fast tracking new ski areas costing billions. They'll vie for a customer base headed downhill.



clubofrome
17-12-2007
Growth blindness
That's what I'm going to call it from now on. Growth blindness. These individuals have no concept of the end of growth. When will we admit we can't even maintain what we already have. End Growth now! Demand a halt to new development. Until such time we can prove that we can maintain what we already have.
The interchange is needed, he says. "The place is growing like crazy. There's more people and more people want to drive."
The above statement from this so called engineer is typical of those with growth blindness. Glad we have it in print, so I can feed it to him one day, when there's even more people and more people want to eat.
monty
17-12-2007
Marching to the tune of a different drummer
All this blind adherence is, of course, part of the 2010 Olympics plan (see www.straight.com May 31/07 cover story)or
www.delta-optimist.com Sept.15/07 letter Greed.)
This greed is the newest social disease. It is running rampant across the province as developers hope to cash in as fast as possible. That is why real estate has zoomed into the stratosphere. $18 million for a condo in Vancouver? Duh?
Where is the Wilderness Committee in all this? BTW I sent a letter to Funny Falcon last week and got an immediate answer. Why is he not responding to journalists ?
What might he be afraid of? This group opposed to Bear Mountain should contact the Valhalla Wilderness Sociey in New Denver which thanks to the McRory's saved Valhalla Wilderness Park and Spirit Bear site. Have a good day.
Watch out. Already one developer has walked away from $95 million of condos in DTVAN and Richmond has large numbers of houses framed and not under construction. Cheers.
roady
17-12-2007
stop bear mountain
bear mountain was a nice mountain ...NOW THE WHOLE TOP IS SKINNED... they call that development???its disgusting, city council should all be fired for allowing such a disgrace... phil.
frank2
17-12-2007
On a "minor" point, the
On a "minor" point, the Province finally agreed to contribute to the costs of this interchange, after more than a year of saying that those costs were required to benefit development in the area and hence should be raised locally (DCCs etc). Pathetic.
On the larger point, the environmental devastation associated with Bear Mountain, and the sprawl it brings, when there's lots of opportunity for "densifying" the "urban" areas of the Capital Regional District, is sickening.
Good on the activists for making a noise about this issue. Let's hope they win. Even if they don't win this one, they are sensitising the public of CRD, making it more difficult for future developers and local governments to desecrate natural areas and trash sound planning in such cavalier fashion.
roady
17-12-2007
wheres all the sewer
wheres all the sewer and fertilizer that keeps the lawn so green going to go??? straight into maple bay thats where!!!
settebello
18-12-2007
A Horrible Example
Bear Mountain will probably serve as the "Reefer Madness" of mega-development and will be pointed to for decades as an example of real estate development run amok. It was not initially touted as the massive extravaganza it has become. Most people in Victoria were unaware that the project would include two massive condo towers until they saw the construction cranes peaking over the eastern slope of Mt. Finlayson on their way down the Malahat.