Mediacheck

'Trimming the Bush to Make the Tree Look Taller'

How razor companies are exploiting male insecurities online to push product.

By Ben Shingler, 2 Jun 2009, TheTyee.ca

razor.png

Gillette viral video showing the tall tree and the trimmed bush.

It's a classic marketing trick, one most often targeted at women: create a sense of insecurity in the consumer that only the product can satisfy.

But a new ad campaign from Gillette aims to do the same with men by capitalizing on our culture's growing uneasiness with male body hair -- and offering up their shaving products as the solution.

This collection of instructional videos featured on the company's website and spreading quickly across the Internet shows a cartoon man shaving different parts of his body -- including his groin. The series implies that hair is unacceptable pretty much anywhere on a man's body except his head.

"Taking care of the hair down there certainly has its benefits," the rational-sounding voice-over explains at the outset of the video. "When there's no underbrush, the tree looks taller."

Gillette apparently believes it can take a few liberties on the Internet with graphics and language. This ad campaign would be entirely inappropriate for network television -- and likely wouldn't make it past regulatory bodies anyway.

The racy content is clearly designed to create a buzz, and it's worked -- the "groin video" has amassed nearly 700,000 views on YouTube only two weeks after being launched.

This is not the first time a razor company has played off men's insecurities about their body hair -- and served to perpetuate them as well.

In 2008, Philips introduced the "Bodygroom Manalogues," a series of semi-ironic confessional videos about the perils of body hair -- and the benefits of shaving it.

"Body hair is something that is vastly common among adult men, but not many actually know how to deal with it," Philips Norelco marketing vice president Arjen Linders said in a statement when the campaign was introduced.

Philips launched a similar campaign back in 2006, featuring a man in a bathrobe relaying the benefits of a hairless body. Back then, it seems men still needed to be told why their body hair should be a source of insecurity.

"This whole issue used to make me quite uncomfortable," the robed man explains. "But these days, with a hair-free back, well-groomed shoulders, and an extra optical inch on my (bleep), let's just say life has gotten pretty darnn cozy."

The man's vaguely '50s hair style, hotel-style white bathrobe and tone of his delivery make the whole thing appear to be from the perspective of the average, Waspy suburban Joe. The message? Even "normal" people find body hair unattractive and a hindrance, hairless is better.

Hard to imagine, though, how stubble from head to toe could be at all "cozy."

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

4  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • VivianLea Doubt

    2 years ago

    an extra optical inch ...

    AAACKKKKKK

  • dave49

    2 years ago

    What a reversal!

    I thought that hairy used to be equated with manliness. I mean, one of the things male hormones do is grow body hair. A hairless male body used to be considered effeminate, although it was accepted that swimmers and bodybuilders shaved their bodies.

    Over the last few years I've seen and heard a lot of comments on the "mainstreaming" of pornography and that's been linked to the female practice of shaving or waxing (the Full Brazilian!) 'down there' becoming more common.

    This is really the whole idea of marketing (and advertising) as creating a need and providing a product to meet that need or re-marketing an existing product.

    During a recent visit to my doctor, I was looking at an early 2009 copy of Chatelaine, featuring 'Men we love'. Here is an answer from their survey of men:
    [http://en.chatelaine.com/english/weekend/article.jsp?content=20090330_112813_1572]

    What kind of grooming do you prefer to see on a woman: landing strip, fully waxed or lady garden?

    Fully waxed - 35 percent
    Landing strip - 27 percent
    Lady garden - 11 percent
    Anything, ­just neatly groomed - 14 percent
    No preference - 13 percent

    How do these ideas get around our culture? I suspect that if ten years ago you asked 100 people to define 'fully waxed', 95 of those people would not know what you were talking about.

  • ME2

    2 years ago

    Fashions

    There's no accounting for what women will consider to be acceptable in fashion from one moment to the next.

    I remember reading an account of when the daughter of an early American President returned from a trip to Paris, she showed up at a Presidenial Ball wearing the very latest fashion statement - consisting only of a completely see-through gown. Presumably she was "neatly groomed" as well. :-)

  • ME2

    2 years ago

    Fashions

    There's no accounting for what women will consider to be acceptable in fashion from one moment to the next.

    I remember reading an account of when the daughter of an early American President returned from a trip to Paris, she showed up at a Presidenial Ball wearing the very latest fashion statement - consisting only of a completely see-through gown. Presumably she was "neatly groomed" as well. :-)

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.