A Complicated Fatness
As resolutions un-resolve all around us, a closer look at one of the biggest.
Ricky Gervais chews the fat.
Ricky Gervais is in trouble this week for the fat jokes in his new audiobook, The Ricky Gervais Guide to Medicine, currently the top download on iTunes.
Talking about gastric bypasses, liposuction and other weight-related surgical procedures, he said, "I really don't know why a doctor under a Hippocratic Oath takes the risk of something going badly wrong, sometimes with general anesthetic, because someone can't be bothered to go for a f---ing run.
"They have bits sliced off and tied up and sucked out. I want to say to them, 'You lazy f---ing fat pig. Just go for a run and stop eating burgers. You might f---ing die.'
He added, "In supermarkets, the really fattening stuff should be behind a really thin door. Shops should be full of salads, but if you want to get to the pies and cakes, you've got to crawl through a little tube."
Gervais, who frequently says he's ashamed of his own weight, and makes jokes about it in his stand up, went on to defend himself on his blog, "I heard someone on the radio once say that they were tired of the prejudice aimed at the overweight. They said something like 'you're not allowed to make fun of gay people, so why are you allowed to make fun of fat people? It's the same thing.'
"It's not the same thing though, is it? Gay people are born that way. They didn't work at becoming gay. Fat people became fat because they would rather be that way than stop eating so much. They had to eat and eat to get fat. Then, when they were fat they had to keep up the eating to stay fat. For gayness to be the same as fatness, gay people would have to start off straight but then ween themselves onto c--k. Soon they're noshing all day getting gayer and gayer. They've had more than enough c--k... they're full... they're just sucking for the sake of it. Now they're overgay, and frowned upon by people who can have the occasional c--k but not over indulge.
"When a doctor tells me that that's how you become gay, I'll stop making jokes about fat people."
Funny but not because it's true
This week, gyms across North America are the busiest they'll be all year, and the top stories in the tabloids are about celebrity weight: weight loss "victories" credited with both physical and career resuscitations (Britney Spears), weight gain sagas full of pain and shame (Oprah), and apparently noteworthy detoxifying cleanses (Gwyneth Paltrow -- based on the cleanse in her weekly newsletter). Plus stories and photos of ordinary people who have "lost half their size!" and get lots of kudos for doing so.
I'm glad Gervais has raised the topic of fat; it's a white elephant in the cultural politics room. But though I am a big fan of his, and though he's right there's a supersized problem that needs fixing, this time, his funny bone is pointed in the wrong blame direction.
The only reason Gervais gets away with it (if he gets away with it at all) is because he's overweight (by his own admission) and his humour is, therefore, self-deprecating. If he were skinny, it would be a bit, well, mean, wouldn’t it? But the point he's trying to make, it seems, is that while we're bombarded with messages encouraging us to consume, we’re not off the hook when it comes to self-control and personal responsibility.
Not that simple
What's weighing on me (sorry) is that while the tabloids and comics are, in my opinion, one of the best barometers of public opinion and of interest in a topic, the issue is a bit more complex than the simple stories they and others are telling. Healthy eating isn't always about self-discipline. It's not just about pulling yourself together and battling your personal Goliath. Because it's not as if everyone has equal access to information about nutrition, nor to bank accounts that can finance organic food and local ingredients instead of a McDonald's hamburger.
Sure, Britney Spears turned it around and it took grit and hard work -- but she hired a team of people to help her. It's great that she works out six hours a day and has had a nutritionist design a 1200 calorie a day, nutritionally complete menu, but most people actually have to show up at the office for most of the day and don't have dietitians on staff. And, yes, people can theoretically do it themselves, but it's not always that simple (though the message we get from the headlines is always simple).
Like most hot button topics, weight is an issue mired deep in class, gender, education, money and politics. It's one with medical factors (hypothyroidism to name but one) and psychological ones (eating disorders and depression to name but two). It's one that's driven by a multi-billion dollar industry, with high stakes for junk food companies, diet companies and everyone in between.
So, on the one hand, we're fed (again, sorry) a constant stream of messages to eat, eat, eat. And on the flip side, we're fed simple morality tales and quick fixes (liposuction, diet pills, fasting, stomach staples) that allow us to, well, continue to eat.
Run away from the buffet
So it's not really surprising that in pop culture right now, when it comes to rise of obesity, the tendencies are to ignore the problem or blame the overweight person sidling up to the all-you-can-eat buffet or getting gastric bypass surgery or liposuction, rather than to grapple with issues like a lack of public health education, poverty, the constant message to consume, and the host of other factors that are the real culprits -- ones that deserve some pointed humor as well as real political action.
But here's what I'm wondering: isn't overconsumption of food as much an environmental problem as the overconsumption of fossil fuels or any other resource? And isn't it's time it got the same kind of attention that other kinds of overconsumption get?
Don't get me wrong. We shouldn’t use someone's weight to determine their ecological footprint. In fact, maybe it's time we looked at the Ironman athlete who consumes 3000 calories a day and then turns around and spends all those calories on bikes plugged in to the wall at the gym, and in heated swimming pools. Yes, they're healthier. And yes of course we need to encourage exercise for a whole variety of reasons. But it's double the food and likely double the food miles.
How about targeting some humor at double standards like that for a start?
Related Tyee stories:
- Save Our Oceans, Eat Like a Pig
Let's stop wasting tasty fish on animal feed. - The Skinny on 'Pinners'
Today's women who aim for thin, just this side of anorexia. - A Local Eating Rhapsody
Why not try a 100-Mile Meal? Third in a series.




4
Login or register to post comments
alive
3 years ago
Will Power
This is another "hot potatoe"!
The simple fact is that nobody loses weight untill they are motivated sufficiently.
Excersise equipment, gyms and videos, are only a symbol that may be erected to show good intent.
What counts is what you eat, and how much you move.
No amount of BS is going to change that simple fact!
Comedians may cash in on it as do a lot of business, but when a person is ready, only personal effort and sweat counts, and absolutely no machinery is needed.
PatrickMcEvoyHalston
3 years ago
Burn off the Fat
I still know some people who read almost a book a day! In addition to getting them to think more about why they overconsume, I'm also trying to get them to be more environmentally friendly, and go Kindle.
(Actually, overconsumption is for me all about trying to make up for lack of love and attendance, and it is incredibly cruel to go after *anyone* who overconsumes, in the spirit of an avenging angel. Times when they tend to do this usually get summed up as times of "purity crusades," that is, times where people are on the lookout, whereeverwhere, for the unfit, for "witches" to burn.)
Ren2
3 years ago
The pain of Dieting
Hi,
I agree that there is no cultural support for eating properly. Our society (funded by large corporations with lots of money) constantly bombard us with messages to eat "quick & dirty" foods, surrounding us with them at every opportunity.
I've actually got a wheat intolerance & am unable to eat most of the food that is readily available, as a result I have to cook almost all of my food from scratch. So, although I'm thin, I don't have the luxury of eating whatever I want whenever I want. I can't eat most of the foods in restaurants, any baked goods, and most of the packaged & pre-processed foods because they contain wheat or something similar. This may sound easy ("Well, if I broke out in a rash every time I ate it I wouldn't do so either.") but it's not; I don't get many noticeable symptoms and they take months to develop. If anything, I may end up suffering at the end of my life due to long-term, hidden consequences. ...The same subtle battle big people fight.
This diet took me a long time to get used to, and I was depressed for several years because of it. Two of the hardest things to get over is that I cannot join in on the social activity of eating (ie "let's get a pizza!" or "I recommend that burger"), plus my food bill is 2-3x that of my friends.
On the other hand, I will say that anyone I know who's gone on this diet has had no effort keeping the weight off and usually needs less exercise to keep it off.
Eating wheat is an amazing luxury, but I've also noticed that wheat not only does wheat cause a lot of weight gain, it is the favorite medium for all those ingredients that are bad for your health.
And, honestly, after a few years you don't really notice it any more; your brain gets used to not having it and stops missing it all the time. I've found that I don't really crave wheat products any more, although sometimes I do crave the convenience of just picking something up. If I do happen to eat it (during my "break" between x-mas & new years) I only want a handful of things that actually enhance or go with the flavour of the wheat - pizza, honey glazed doughnuts, and sourdough bread.
It's a hard diet to follow, even harder given that society seems to have defaulted on it's collective responsibility to maintain a narrative to assist & support people psychologically through hard situations in favour of letting corporations almost prey upon us, but it can be followed. And it gives you immense freedom and control over your life & your self. You're not a victim - pulled & pushed around by advertisements and other people's agenda; and then blamed when it is extremely psychologically difficult and makes you unhealthy.
p.s. Switching to asian cooking (with rice) worked the best for me.
jdn
3 years ago
ecological footprint
Richmond worries about using the ecological footprint argument on obese people, but I think it's a very fair comment.
Visit a very poor country as an over-weight Westerner, and see how you feel about your weight then. I personally lost 50 pounds while living in Asia in 2004/05 - not because of some populistic diet or New Year's resolution, but because every day I felt guilty that I had the financial means to over-consume that others didn't have.
Obesity and consumption do have an impact on our personal ecological footprints.