Artsculture

Love Cheese? Try 'Grindhouse'

But schlock is tastier with less Tarantino sauce.

By Steve Burgess, 6 Apr 2007, TheTyee.ca

Car with skull

Drive-in tribute: 'Death Proof.'

Grindhouse is longer than Apocalypse Now. End of comparison.

Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez have created two full-length movies, each a tribute to the 70s-era "grindhouse" films -- ultra-cheap exploitation movies full of girls, gore, and ghouls -- and released them as a drive-in style double bill, complete with trailers for phony movies, ads for local Tex-Mex restaurants, "missing reels" and melting film. Rodriguez kicks it off with a zombie tale called "Planet Terror," and Tarantino closes the show with "Death Proof," the story of an old boy and his car. For fans of the directors, or of the campy genre, Grindhouse is review-proof. But will it jump to the box office A-list?

Attempting a ready-made cult film is tricky. Self-conscious smirking tends to spoil things. Rodriguez' 2005 Sin City paid such intense tribute to the conventions of film noir that it turned into a sort of cinematic karaoke. "Planet Terror" fares better, for the most part. It's generally a lot of fun -- at least until Tarantino drops his pants.

"Planet Terror" stars Freddy Rodriguez as Wray, a mysterious loner secretly known as El Rey. Rose McGowan is Cherry Darling, soon to lose her leg and become known as Peggy, later to acquire a machine gun gam and become known as Whatever You Say, Ma'am. Josh Brolin is nasty Doctor Block, who never quite gets around to killing his wife, girl-happy Dr. Dakota Block (Marley Shelton). Bruce Willis shows up unannounced as a creepy military man somehow involved in the testing of a heinous, zombie-creating weapon. Many un-credited zombies appear to show off bubbling skin lesions that burst in gratuitous geysers of gore. As they should.

Quite enough Quentin

Tarantino appears in both movies, spreading his unpleasant screen presence liberally. It is when he drops his drawers in "Planet Terror" that my tolerance level for this sort of trashy tribute was exceeded. Fun's fun, but a depiction of Quentin's oozing, supurating sexual equipment doesn't qualify. The intentional bad-print effects can also be annoying, but at least both directors squeeze a laugh out of the "Sorry -- missing reel!" gag.

Grindhouse offers built-in protection for pesky questions. You may find yourself wondering: how exactly is Cherry Darling pulling the trigger on her Gam Gun, anyway? And then you will answer yourself: It's a machine-gun leg, fool. If it didn't shoot, there wouldn't be a movie.

Many will avail themselves of the between-film break to hit the biffy. To quote the name of one of the trailer films: "Don't." The trailers, directed by the likes of Rob Zombie and Eli Roth and featuring Nicholas Cage among others, are a hoot. Trailers also precede the film, and many will be disappointed that they will be unable to see Hobo with a Shotgun. One of the phony films, Machete, starring Danny Trejo, has apparently made the jump to reality -- Rodriguez claims he has a deal in place to make it.

Yada yada

"Death Proof" is up second. It's a Tarantino movie. Really. A tribute to cheap exploitation flicks it may be, but most of all it's a Tarantino movie, full of his trademark touches. Too full, in fact.

Kurt Russell stars as Stunt Man Mike, a psycho killer whose car, he claims, is "death proof." How do you make a car "death proof?" Lots of padding. Tarantino certainly offers that. Death Proof is larded with those trademark Tarantino bull sessions, in which characters prattle on entertainingly about very little. Just as all Woody Allen's characters tend to sound like Woody Allen, Tarantino's stars seem to channel each other. Tracie Thoms (as Kim the Stunt Driver) sounds just like Samuel Jackson in Jackie Brown, while Rosario Dawson, playing Abernathy, occasionally channels Uma Thurman from Pulp Fiction, and so on.

A tip for the ass-weary: go ahead and watch the between-movie trailers, and then light out for the facilities as soon as Thoms, Dawson, Zoe Bell, and Mary Elizabeth Winstead (as Lee, the starlet) sit down in a diner and start talking about a big ditch. Take your time -- you won't miss much.

Never mind

And you'll want to be back when things do get rolling. A climactic car chase is Tarantino at his best. More questions may intrude -- when did Stunt Man Mike's death-proof car lose its mojo? -- but are best dismissed. Other questions may intrude sometime after the closing credits when you suddenly recall that a very creepy plot thread involving Winstead's character was simply never picked up. It's an intentional error. Tarantino's ending is so totally artless, it must be art.

Movies like this don't have themes, but they do have personalities. Tarantino's is elegiac. Using the aging Russell -- a weirdly likeable psychopath -- Tarantino recreates conversations he must have had with pretty young things born too late for his obscure cultural references. The Virginian? Vega$, the 70s TV series? Robert Urich? Sorry, old man. Never heard of them.

Both Rodriguez and Tarantino pepper their scripts with sly references to B-favourites like Killdozer and, especially, Vanishing Point. Although it's all a very long inside joke, the directors generally take care to make their movies work for those not of the film-geek persuasion.

Box office boffo? It may be too long and too cheesy for that. But unlike Kill Bill Vols. I and II, at least Grindhouse will be a single rental. And you can pause it.

Related Tyee Stories:

 [Tyee]

16  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • maestro

    5 years ago

    Who doesn't like cheese ?

    Saw the trailer clips to this collaboration on a DVD I recently rented.

    Can't say I've seen a bad Tarantino or Rodriguez film.

    Never boring.

  • bob the cat

    5 years ago

    Who cares what you like maestro?

    Nobody cares what you like mouster

    Have you got anything to say other than YOU like it?
    Here mouseter, mouseter mouseter

    IF i rote a colum and had you commenting i`D be REALLY embarrassed.
    Ya Git

  • maestro

    5 years ago

    Bob duh barking Cat

    Oops Bob duh Cat is angry...
    Guess the date in the convertible didn't go well. Ran out of kitty litter again eh Bob?

  • southdeltawalker

    5 years ago

    southdeltawaler

    Here we go again just another movie{s} to appeal to men. Burgess also put that Borat movie and Casino Royale on this best picks of 2006.

    Yikes... with Woodends pick last week-a horror movie and now this, my list of movies to avoid just keeps growing longer.

    So why is Steve Burgess still reviewing movies that are sexist and misognist? If comments were made akin to the way women are portrayed in these "films" I'm sure they would be removed as offensive. So why is it o.k. to review these movies in the Tyee?

    There are other films that actually have merit, not a product of Hollywood hype and believe it or not can tell a story without becoming misoginist.

    As I'm Southdeltawalker I'm going out for a walk to look at the eagles and get the images from reading this review out of head!

  • flattax

    5 years ago

    South Deta Walker ... too true

    Burgess..If you dont like hollywood drivel movies, why do you keep reviewing them?

    I think you secretly like mass produced cookie cutter pop culture movies.

    You like them because you get to feel intellectual and it is good for your ego to be so condescending.

    Or perhaps you are trying to work up to a position as a CBC movie critic.

    You are like a wine reviewer that only reviews wine in boxes, but considers himself a gourmet.

  • southdeltawalker

    5 years ago

    thanks flattax

    hopefully Burgess's "career" as a movie reviewer will end soon...cause i don't know how much longer i'm going to bother even reading them!

  • James Burns

    5 years ago

    hmmm

    A lot of bitching this Good Friday it would appear.

    Perhaps reviewing a movie like Grindhouse is relevant because it is rather unique in comparison to most concurrent releases? A three hour homage to cheese that makes fun of hollywood.

    Ah but who am I fooling? People like flattax and southdeltawalker bitch because they're too lazy to look elsewhere, and they like behaving like spoiled children when their particular desires aren't fulfilled.

  • southdeltawalker

    5 years ago

    james burns....

    About being "too lazy to look elsewhere". I though reading The Tyee was looking elsewhere. Isn't The Tyee supposed to be an alternative to the mainstream media?

    As for the rest of your comment...at least i can comment without resorting to verbally abusing someone.

  • James Burns

    5 years ago

    Not resorting to verbally

    Not resorting to verbally abusing someone? Please reread your comments above to Burgess your oh so high and mighty.

  • BC Mary

    5 years ago

    Jeez.

    Today is Good Friday and from watching the TV News I now know that some devout Christians demonstrate their faith by getting themselves nailed to a cross, or self-flagellating, or hauling large pieces of timber down the street on their backs, or simply starving themselves.

    So taken in that spirit of Christian self-loathing, I guess I can try to understand all the bitching and sniping going on here.

    Sure is puzzling, though.

  • Elliot

    5 years ago

    does anyone else out there

    does anyone else out there think tarentino is one of the most over-rated directors on the scene today? as far as i'm concerned the fact that he's so popular proves you can sell just about anything if it's packaged to suit the letterman/leno/mtv crowd.

  • Steve Burgess

    5 years ago

    maaaybeee...

    If no one else is taking a run at that Elliot, I'll have a go with a solid "maybe."

    Tarantino certainly suffers from a case of hubris. It's hilarious but instructive to hear him talk about how he got the idea for Death Proof--once, he says, he felt he was indestructible because God put him here to do great things. Then after Pulp Fiction he worried and bought a Volvo--in case his great work was done.

    But I generally enjoy his work. When he reins in his excesses he's an intelligent popular filmmaker. The popularity of some other directors makes my blood boil. But not Tarantino.

  • Elliot

    5 years ago

    i liked jackie brown and

    i liked jackie brown and rate pulp fiction at around 70%. decent but hugely overrated. i thought reservoir dogs was pure unadulterated garbage and kill bill made no sense whatsoever unless, i guess, you're quentin. i appreciate his passion and his sincerity, and he seems one of the least pretentious personalities in hollywood, but i really don't understand all the praise of his movies.

  • Bobby Peru

    5 years ago

    Self-referential and over derivative

    Tarentino is one of Hollywood's most genuine stars and is sincerely affectionate about his craft and favourite genre of film. Unfortunately, his work is highly derivative and sub-referential. He does little to reinterpret the genre. Rather, he just throws up a collection of ripped off scenes from a genre of film.

    In Kill Bill, Tarentino copies a slew of gore and fighting scenes from Chinese movies I used to see in Chinatown. After Pulp Fiction, his movies seem like they are scenes with the plot as an afterthought. And they all look and feel the same. Where's the freshness of Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction?

    We all know that he bought off the co-writer of Pulp Fiction, his friend who worked with him in the video store, so Tarentino could credit himself as 'Director and Writer'. And many of his video store colleagues contributed ideas to his first scripts. No wonder it just seems like Tarentino has run out of new ideas or can't adapt himself to anything else.

    Now if you want to see original reinterpretation of a genre take a look at Altman's film, 'The Long Goodbye' with Elliot Gould. Altman places Raymond Chandler's idealistic detective Philip Marlowe in 70s LA without copying scenes from noire films. Rather, he blends the character's morality with the current society. Funny, but low keyed.

    I read the Weinstein's are unhappy with Grindhouse and will recut it and release it as two separate films. No wonder, the US numbers were mediocre.

  • maestro

    5 years ago

    Saw Grindhouse Last night

    If time is a factor, one certainly got one's money' worth. Over 3 hours long.

    Overall, I'd also recommend it...especially the Planet Terror portion.

    The phoney trailers were good, actually one hopes many of them get made...such as Machete.

    Liked the loyalty Tarantino and Rodriguez show to a posse' of actors, seen many familiar faces from past movies . They also certainly don't hold back on the " eye candy ". Also enjoy seeing major stars like Nicholas Cage and Bruce Willis take more humble roles in these types of movies...no matter how minor the screen time.

    Personally speaking, finding movies these days flatter than a slashed tire...the latest video releases tempt one to demand one's money back. However, I'll probably buy Grindhouse when it becomes available on DVD .

  • guanolad

    5 years ago

    too long?

    According to the Guardian, following a poor showing in its opening weekend and audiences leaving in droves after Rodriguez's film (apparently unaware that there was another to come), Miramax is going to release it as two separate movies elsewhere in the world. They may even re-release it in North America as two films.

    I really enjoyed Jackie Brown. I loved Pulp Fiction when it was released, but I couldn't sit through it upon renting it ten years later. No "timeless classic" that one.

    Tarantino should stop making movies and get a Siskel/Ebert type show - he's much more entertaining when he's talking about movies than when he's behind the camera.

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.