Artsculture

Forced to Watch: Too Much Sex

The smug divas of Sex and the City just wore me out. Gotta wonder, is HBO good for Canada?

By Steve Burgess, 30 Dec 2004, TheTyee.ca

849

TheTyee.ca

It's probably pointless to criticize the adventures of columnist Carrie Bradshaw and her New York pals, a Friday night social ritual for happy, cocktail-swilling little groups everywhere. The show has come to represent so much--adult entertainment on regular TV, honest perspectives on sex and relationships, unabashed celebrations of sexual joy, women on top. Sex and the City has indeed done yeowoman's service in breaking new ground for honest discussions of intimate situations.

And the show's writing has often provided quality TV of the sort any discerning viewer could appreciate, especially after going a few rounds with Everybody Loves Raymond.

But time's up, at least for me.

In this, its sixth and final season (on Bravo in Canada) I seem to have developed an allergy.

When Carrie went all Woody

It happened with Woody Allen movies, too. One day I was watching Manhattan Murder Mystery on the tube when suddenly an internal switch flipped and I realized I probably couldn't watch a Woody Allen movie ever again. The clunky exposition, that stammery Woody Allen voice he provides to all these different characters--I had become allergic.

Same with Carrie Bradshaw and friends. I was watching the episode where Mikhail Baryshnikov makes his big debut as Carrie's new hunk, and I snapped. Shut off the TV and cancelled that weekly Friday appointment. The creators of the series have announced that it is nearing its end anyway, but I'm way ahead of them. Sex and the City is over.

Maybe I have it in for the Big Apple. It's true that I do grind my teeth over that whole New-York-is-all-that-matters ethos both Allen and Sex and the City share. It gave Carrie and the gang a self-satisfied, we're-hot-and-you're-not air that always worked against my appreciation of the show's finer points.

The attitude also infected the show's writing. Sex and the City worked best when it examined the genuine hurts and pains of dating and love. But there were always other, parallel tracks to the show--the gags-and-gasps routines.

Sex and the City has always set out to shock, often to its detriment. When Samantha Jones (Kim Cattrall) scratched her crotch at a café table (itchy because her shaved pubic hair was growing back in), did viewers nod knowingly and say, "Oh, how true?" My ass itches occasionally, but it's hardly profound and not particularly funny (Rob Schneider films notwithstanding).

Clever but too self-conscious by half

 

Another plotline about bad-tasting sperm was just one of the show's many ridiculous attempts to top itself in the dare department. The only ground being broken here is in the perennial field of lowbrow humour--these are the kinds of things Benny Hill would have done if he could.

The cast--Sarah Jessica Parker as Carrie, Kristin Davis as Charlotte York, Cattrall, and the excellent Cynthia Nixon as Miranda Hobbes--engage in relentlessly snappy dialogue that often belies the show's image as near-reality TV. When someone at the girls' favorite café table gets off a good line, no one seems more pleased than the show itself--you can almost hear the rim-shots. Self-conscious cleverness becomes irritating fairly quickly, and Sex and the City has always had it in spades.

Cattrall has always been one of the show's major weak points. Her Samantha is a potentially appealing character, a woman with a take-no-prisoners sexual attitude. (Most of the show's writers have been men, and it has been suggested elsewhere that for Samantha's character the writers simply did a trans-gender operation on a single, sexually adventurous gay man.) But Cattrall's smug diva act gets old quick. In her hands Samantha has always seemed a paper-thin caricature. As for the show's writers, where Samantha is concerned they sometimes miss the line between sassy and pathetic. In one episode Samantha papers a New York street with flyers proclaiming that her ex is a jerk, a move that is portrayed as spunky and bold. Creepy and sad would have been about right.

An article in Salon.com decried another sad Sex and the City trend, namely the gradual deification of star Sarah Jessica Parker and the resulting effect on Carrie Bradshaw, her character. Bradshaw, the article pointed out, frequently looked ridiculous in early episodes--something any long-term single person can relate to, and a major part of the show's charm. Now it seems Parker has been reading her own press clippings. The result has been the emergence of Queen Carrie, always flawless, suitable only for the fabulous likes of Mikhail Baryshnikov.

Enough. Sex and the City has had its cultural moment. Save it a place in the dustbin of history, somewhere beside Woody and Mia's wedding photos.

What HBO means to Canadians

Of course, we will still have HBO's other contributions to the Canadian television universe:  The Sopranos, Six Feet Under, and whatever else they are cooking up in their "cutting edge TV" laboratories.

HBO programs were already considered groundbreaking in the US, but in Canada the shows have taken on an extra, unintended significance. Created for pay TV, they were thus free to abandon the middle-of-the-road morality required of broadcast television and indulge themselves in sex and profanity to their heart's content. Since those same shows are airing in Canada on basic cable channels like Bravo and even broadcast networks like CTV, they have been transformed into boundary-pushing experiments in audience tolerance (not to mention the new ground they have plowed in the field of content warnings. CTV's terrifying on-screen cautions preceding the Sopranos rival those found on cigarette packages).

True, cable companies recently failed in their bid to bring HBO to Canada--their lobbying to the CRTC trumped by complaints from Canadian broadcasters and specialty channels that HBO would be unfair competition.  For law-abiding Canadians, it means that HBO programs will continue to be scattered around the dial as Canadian channels cherry-pick the best.

The best being…what?  Well, I'd say if Sex in the City is the nag overdue for the glue factory, Six Feet Under is The Pretender and The Sopranos is the Champ. More on those shows in my next column.


Forced to Watch is a new occasional column at The Tyee about what's good and not on television, and widely published writer Steve Burgess is hogging the control.  [Tyee]

12  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Peter Tupper (not verified)

    8 years ago

    I agree the show has had its moment, not only geographically but generationally. The show admitted as much when Carrie attended a party full of bisexual, polyamorous twenty-somethings, showing that she was well, well past the cutting edge of sexual experimentation. Let her retire gracefully before she turns into Edina from "Absolutely Fabulous." There is one advantage to getting HBO series piecemeal here in Canada: we can get them with our regular cable subscriptions.

  • Jerry Munro (not verified)

    8 years ago

    I must confess, I'm really not much of a TV watcher. While I'm as appreciative of sexual eye candy as any male, that which parades ever more brazen and clearly designed to "manipulate" and "exploit" us on the TV screen is all pretty shallow, and yes, smug, smug, smug, in my view. And it's everywhere, porn thinly disguised as... a kind of thin stone soup mostly. And to say that I really find it all quite boring is an understatement. (Actually, I suspect sometimes, most of it is more about women really just stroking themselves in their own self-fascinated way, than anything.) My advice to young males needing to jerk off is, and let's face it, that's what a lot of this stuff plays to, there's more direct and to the point flesh and movement out there, and while it too is clearly exploitive shit, of both men and women, it'll do way better at getting your rocks off. While I appreciate, women will doubtless have their own view of all this, of course, such as Sex and the City is mostly boring, self-indulgent femalia to me anyway, and has more to do with dollars than real sex, this side of the seamy side of the capitalist market place. It's all just too wierd for me, frankly. T.V.? I think I'll load up and head off for a little Xcountry ski.

  • Darren (not verified)

    8 years ago

    While I concur that "Sex in the City" has definitely had its moment in the sun, I do appreciate much of what HBO has to offer. For example, they produced the 6-hour mini-series "Angels in America", based on one of the finest American plays of the past 50 years. It's a risky project, but it's got an outstanding cast and was critically acclaimed in the States (it will air in Canada on MovieCentral on Jan. 11 and 18).

  • JL Frandsen (not verified)

    8 years ago

    Sex in the City. Boring. Another reason that I don't watch TV half as much as I used to. I'm not interested in their boring lives. You know what was on Global last night? Two or three of those sad "reality" shows in a row. Want some indoor entertainment? Read something besides the tv guide.

  • joel McFarlane (not verified)

    8 years ago

    How are we forced to watch "too much sex"? My responce to this is much the same as what stand-up comic, George Carlin once said in regards to one of his shows(the seven words you can't say) "That, of course, leaves out the fact that there are two buttons on the radio/T.V. One turns it off, the other changes the station". Sex and the city is just like any show out there, it had it's time but is now falling out. Ms. Bradshaw has already stated that this is the last season so WHAT IS EVERYONE BITCHING ABOUT! Who cares, just enjoy the shows good episodes, and ignore the others. Besides, this show is actually very good for T.V.; It has stretched and broken the bounderies of T.V and sociotal do's and don'ts that many other programs could never do. As a result of this show, there will be many other shows where Women can be the agressive one's whithout being labeled by people as "sluts' or "whores".

  • FMaxwell (not verified)

    8 years ago

    Sex and the city is fabulous! I don't have a tv,(too much crap) but love watching this show at a friend's when I can. And as for the men who write the scripts- nice going guys!! Atleast some men get it.

  • Sam, I Am (not verified)

    8 years ago

    Wow, talk about smug and self-satisfied. So now Steve Burgess weighs in on the art of television comedy writing! My heavens. Is there anything this guy isn't prepared to bloviate at length about? I'm not at all sure what makes him think he's qualified to critique the wonderful work of Michael Patrick King and the talented stable of writers at Sex and the City. Mr. Burgess' contribution to the television landscape is what exactly? He might wish to tone down the smugness factor on that lame little CBC chat-fest of his, if it's still on, that is.

  • joe (not verified)

    7 years ago

  • joe (not verified)

    7 years ago

    ben dover

  • joe (not verified)

    7 years ago

    ben dover

  • joe (not verified)

    7 years ago

    jack the ripper

  • joe, (not verified)

    7 years ago

    there is to much for my likeing

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.