Ten Books to Read on the Job
Want to understand the shifting world of work? Read these works. Recommended by BC leaders in the field of labour.
'Ya know, this Karl guy is starting to make sense.'
As part of The Tyee's Labour Week coverage, we asked a range of leaders and experts in B.C to share the books that keep them informed, inspired and up to speed on the changing landscape of work. Here is what they recommended reading:
B.C. Labour Minister Murray Coell's choice for history and context around unions and labour solidarity in B.C.:
No Greater Power: A Century of Labour in B.C. by Dr. Paul Phillips
This is a definitive account of the initial trade unionist movement that flourished in B.C. during the early 20th century.
Beginning with the fur trade, the book works through the tumultuous depression and wartime eras, and the unification problems faced by the B.C. Federation of Labour as it amassed a membership of 125,000 in 1966.
The book's author, Dr. Paul Phillips, noted in 1967, "The trade union movement in B.C. is older than the province itself. It bears the character of the province's rapid yet often unstable development."
Phillips' life could have been its own lengthy volume. Born in Hong Kong to missionary parents and raised in British Columbia, Phillips worked as an economics researcher and Royal Canadian Air Force pilot to finance his Ph. D. in labour economics. A collector of labour and protest songs, Phillips was also a noted folk singer/multi-instrumentalist with skills on the guitar, banjo and autoharp. No Greater Power emerged from research done while completing his thesis. When it was published in 1967, he was the research director for the BC Federation of Labour.
NDP MLA for Vancouver-Kensington Mable Elmore on what to read to understand the plummeting standards of work for new Canadians in B.C.:
Work and Labour in Canada: Critical Issues by Andrew Jackson
This book puts in perspective what Elmore considers "a growing polarization in Canada's labour market" that includes an increase in irregular, low paid jobs and an increasing number of temporary foreign workers taking up these occupations, who are vulnerable to abuse and exploitation.
"Another very important note is that the Canadian (and B.C.) economy is moving towards a more knowledge-based economy, which necessitates the importance of training and skills upgrading, especially with workers in low paid work," says Elmore.
In particular, the MLA thinks, "the issue of systemic racism [Jackson] raises in the area of governments failing to recognize credentials of foreign trained professionals is an issue that we can improve here in B.C."
Jim Sinclair, president of the BC Federation of Labour recommends reading about an epic labour battle of the past:
Big Trouble: A Murder in a Small Western Town Sets Off a Struggle for the Soul of America by J. Anthony Lukas
Here is a dramatic account of the warfare between a radical miner's unions, company interests and the government in turn-of-the-century Idaho.
Despite being set in the U.S., the book hinges on "the roots of power and class in society. The battles that were fought by the Western Federation of Miners," says Sinclair, "were many of the same battles that were fought here."
Sinclair sees further parallels between events in B.C. and Lukas's book. "In the late 1800s and early 1900s, when all this was happening, it was also happening here. There was a major coal miner's strike on the island where Mother Jones came and spoke to them. Miners felt connected."
The book is "partly a reminder; it's partly an inspiration," says Sinclair. "This strike was all about some miners getting ripped off and all the other miners joining with them to have a strike so that they kept the standard of the industry up. This is not just about miners, it's about working people in general." Though the book is historical, Sinclair says the issues haven't changed. "All these things are more important than ever."
Barry O'Neil of CUPE on what to read to understand how to benefit local economies and communities:
The Small-Mart Revolution by Michael Schuman
One reason for O'Neil's book choice is that he relates with Schuman's ideas: "The Small Mart Revolution itself really talks about what I've talked about for a long time, and that's really not about stopping anything, but starting something different." O'Neil believes "if we're inundated with global, global, global everything... I think people want to see some initiative that's closer to home, that they can participate in without reading NAFTA."
The book is "really about how you develop new kinds of revenue streams in communities" says O'Neil. It offers advice on "the kinds of things that you can do in rural communities that can make a difference to quality of life. It's more relevant now than it's ever been."
"I think that if local communities get behind something, there's nothing more powerful than that."
Jim Britton, vice president of CEP western region, on what to read to understand the history of the oil industry and labour in Canada:
Tracking the Canadian Formula by Wayne Roberts
"It's an interesting book for workers to understand how the oil industry evolved along with the labour movement in Canada," according to Britton.
Tracking the Canadian Formula explores how there used to be "a much larger, viable oil industry in B.C. than there is today. Right now on the coast, there is only one operating refinery, which is Chevron, but at one point there was Chevron, Shell and Petro Canada all operating. Before that was Petrofina." Britton thinks the book "may be of interest to Canadian workers" because it explains "that the west coast, at one point, was a major player in the oil industry. It wasn't always just about Alberta. We were a thriving refining province."
"What's happening with the economy in British Columbia, with the solid wood sector closing down," says Britton, is that "there are a great number of people living in B.C. but working [in the oil sands] in Alberta. It's created this transient workforce from Alberta to B.C."
Kelly Pollack, executive director of the Immigrant Employment Council of B.C., on what B.C. employers can read to better their relationship with immigrant employees:
Recruiting, Retaining and Promoting Culturally Different Employees by Lionel LaRoche and Don Rutherford
Pollack is enthusiastic about this read, touting it as an essential resource for employers who want to "do a better job of attracting, hiring, and retaining immigrants" as employees. Pollack notes, "with the coming demographic shift and potential labour shortages in many areas in our labour market," employers "can use all the tools they can get and one of the tools is this book."
"Our workforce has changed," says Pollack. This book is about how to "use that changing workforce to assist your business to grow and also to [ensure] that the employees within your business work as a team."
Marc Lee, senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, suggests a book that details the economic benefits of living and working in a society where equality counts:
The Spirit Level: Why more Equal Societies Almost Always Do It Better by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett
"It is not a huge tome, as one might expect from such a broad topic, weighing in at just 265 pages of text (including lots of figures mapping inequality against some health and social statistic, and some clever cartoons). That space, however, offers up a rich synthesis of empirical findings and some theorizing about how unequal societies -- largely (except for the poorest countries) irrespective of per capita income -- do worse on almost every important health and social indicator we might care about," wrote Lee in a review of The Spirit Level that appeared here on The Progressive Economics Forum blog.
B.C. author and activist Allan Engler offers this book to understand how the modern financial industry came to be, and how it falls short:
The Myth of the Rational Market: A History of Risk, Reward and Delusion on Wall Street by Justin Fox
Engler considers Fox's work "a biography of the ideas and the people involved in supply-side economics." He was particularly interested in "the central role that this ideology, the notion that moving money, moving income from wage and salary workers to profits, to corporations, to the owners of the wealth, would actually be a good thing for the economy."
"With globalization," says Engler, "there is no reason to think that putting more money in the hands of investors in British Columbia is going to lead to more jobs in British Columbia. It can actually mean more money going to places with cheaper labour and higher rates of profit, and that is, in fact, what is happening."
Mark Leier, history professor at Simon Fraser University and director of the SFU Centre for Labour studies, on how to understand what it means to be in the throes of late capitalism:
Capital by Karl Marx
"This book tells us is that in the last 150 or 200 years, the best brains that capitalism has put up to look after itself have been unable to come up with a single new idea," says Leier. "The minute the profits dip, the only response they have is 'How do we cut wages, how do we cut people?'" Marx's work is a reminder that it's "the system itself that we have to be critical of," and that it's not always about "an inept premier or evil capitalists."
Looking forward, Leier says that "Even in the worst of times... progress is made when people organize. That's the key for people to think about the future. It's not about electing Vision Vancouver, it's about all kinds of struggles that people need to take up. If we sit back and let the bosses do it for us, we're going to get more of the same."
Leier offers three bits of professorial advice on how to read Capital:
Skip ahead. "The beginning is awful. I would absolutely not start at the beginning. I would start with part eight, which is actually a historical account of how capitalism got started. I would end up with reading part one. I would read part eight, then parts three to seven."
Read with your friends. "I think it's a good to try to read it in a group with people. Everyone reads this and comes away with something different. In fact, while the ideas are couched within this dry, odd language, the ideas are not that difficult to grasp." Marx's racy references to oral sex, employee violence and the vampiric tendencies of capitalist economies should the get your reading group going, Leier told The Tyee.
Consider your personal circumstances. "If you ask yourself, 'How does this work itself out in my workplace?' it becomes much easier to figure out. Because, as I said, the rules of the game haven't changed at all since he was writing."
Bill Saunders, president of the Vancouver and District Labour Council, recommends a book to help people resist the daily grind of the future:
The End of Work by Jeremy Rifkin
Rifkin's book suggests that "In the future, we're going to value personal services a lot more... things that help us live a better quality of life, like recreation leaders... which are actually very low valued jobs right now," says Saunders.
"I think it's important for people to understand that we're looking at a future where maybe we're really not so based in heavy industry," Saunders notes. In the future, it may be that "we're paying a lot more attention to our quality of life and especially things that help us live as better human beings."
"The labour movement has to start focusing a lot more on not on just more wages, more benefits... but the essential aspect, which is that we want our families to have a good quality of life." That means a good environment, a job that's meaningful to us and that we appreciate doing. "This book opens the door to thinking that it's not just about grinding more stuff out of the earth, that's just not the direction. It's about people. That's what’s important."
Tomorrow: Visiting the longest running picket line in B.C., the UFCW striking workers at Loblaws grocery in Maple Ridge. ![]()





14
Login or register to post comments
realisticman
1 year ago
Fidedl Castro: He reads The Atlantic
The Associated Press
Date: Thursday Sep. 9, 2010 6:20 AM ET
HAVANA — Cuba's communist economic model has come in for criticism from an unlikely source: Fidel Castro.
The revolutionary leader told a visiting American journalist and a U.S.-Cuba policy expert that the island's state-dominated system is in need of change, a rare comment on domestic affairs from a man who has taken pains to steer clear of local issues since illness forced him to step down as president four years ago.
The fact that things are not working efficiently on this cash-strapped Caribbean island is hardly news. Fidel's brother Raul, the country's president, has said the same thing repeatedly. But the blunt assessment by the father of Cuba's 1959 revolution is sure to raise eyebrows.
Jeffrey Goldberg, a national correspondent for The Atlantic magazine, asked Castro if Cuba's economic system was still worth exporting to other countries, and Castro replied: "The Cuban model doesn't even work for us anymore," Goldberg wrote Wednesday in a post on his Atlantic blog.
...Goldberg, who traveled to Cuba at Castro's invitation last week to discuss a recent Atlantic article he wrote ..."
Investor
1 year ago
The Mark brothers
Marc Lee - ask the Russians & Chinese how "spiritual, social or healthy" they found equality of outcome under communism. It's equality of opportunity that is likely correlated to happiness indicators.
Mark Leier - not a single idea? Capitalism is charged with many things...but not generally it's long track record of creativity leading to life enhancing inventions. You must usually be smarter than this if David Beers is letting you be quoted here.
wanderingraven
1 year ago
The Great Transformation
A good starting place for anyone who wants to really know how the world works is Karl Polanyi's 'The Great Transformation'.
It's a fundamental read.
Glen Murtz
1 year ago
Agree with wanderingraven on Polanyi and ...
Why am I not surprised all these middle-to-upper-class, well off people, enriched by the very system they critique or seek to manage in its current incarnation don't offer up anything too radical?
Could it be that they're so enamored with the stink of their respective ideologies and the sweet smell of cash that that thinking has granted them that THEY ARE TOO UNIMAGINATIVE TO CONTEMPLATE ANOTHER WAY FOR OUR SOCIETIES TO FUNCTION?
Sure looks like it to me.
Milquetoast, banal crap offered by blinkered boneheads who've risen to the top because they've internalized their organizations values at the expense of alternative ones.
I mean my God, when this Saunders guy offers up bon mots like, "I think it's important for people to understand that we're looking at a future where maybe we're really not so based in heavy industry,"...
LOLOLOL
DUDE. OMG.
This "revelation" this clown offers up has been happening for oh, I dunno, 20 FREAKING YEARS. Seriously - has this tool been on the moon for the last quarter century? And wasn't Rifkin the imbecile who was promoting hydrogen a few years back? That's going really well there...
And the rest of this sad, pathetic group of "leaders" who've made their nut clinging to the dollars that come to the believers are no better.
Maybe they should check out a book that's braver then they could aspire to. You know, "grow" a little. Or maybe a pair. (Sexist - yeh I know - but I'm going with it anyways just to piss off people who focus on the fruit instead of the tree, so to speak)
Read Conrad Schmidt's Workers of the World - Relax. Or check out Curtis White's The Spirit of Disobedience. Christ you could even start with Jane Jacobs Dark Days Ahead - but read it until you can finally grasp what's really happening. Now. In the world. On your watch.
Oh - I forgot - if one of these "leaders" ever offered up something truly "unique", they'd be packing their crap out of their office before noon.
Because that's how it works in the "adult" world Timmy. We leave the ugly truths on the playground and move "forward" by deliberate blindness.
This list reflects poorly on these people in so many ways. So shallow, so simple, so *strategic*.
It makes me sick to my stomach these people lead anything, when it's evident they have no vision of a just world, no capacity for imagination beyond "tinkering".
They're collectively brain dead or gutless and I'd pity their shallowness, except....
Neither stupidity nor cowardice does our society (or their organizations members) any good. Not a single one of these people will be remembered by history for changing anything - even though unlike most of us, they've found themselves in a position to do so.
"Leaders" my ass.
"Sycophantic, narrow minded followers" is what this group is.
Frank
1 year ago
Investor
You used the word "likely". Care to back that up with some analysis?
Its pretty obvious why countries that have less inequality do better on social and health indicators. Inequality breeds an "us versus them" frame of mind and it therefore becomes impossible to create a better society where people feel part of something greater.
As for the Russians and Chinese, why not instead ask all the African and Latin American countries if capitalism made their societies more "spiritual, social or healthy" and if there's much inequality on those continents?
And lastly, "investors" are the least creative people on the planet by definition. That's why they have to try and make a living on the backs of others, they're incapable of doing anything themselves.
Frank
1 year ago
realisticman
Change the word "Castro" to "Campbell" and "Cuba" to "BC" and your quote reads just as well.
The BC model of huge debts, falling incomes, greater insecurity, inferior government programs and higher taxes probably doesn't have a lot of believers either.
Frank
1 year ago
For Investor and r'man
Albert Einstein's essay on why he'd like to see socialism.
http://www.monthlyreview.org/598einstein.php
Here's an excerpt for those wanting just the summation :
"This crippling of individuals I consider the worst evil of capitalism. Our whole educational system suffers from this evil. An exaggerated competitive attitude is inculcated into the student, who is trained to worship acquisitive success as a preparation for his future career.
I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society."
realisticman
1 year ago
You can call him Al
You know, Frank, Al wrote that over 60 years ago. Whatever social structures existed then have been refined and some have just evaporated. The socialist states have dwindled and there are now only perhaps four countries in the world that still cling to the idea of socialism, and, as we read this week, even Castro and Cuba may well soon leave that club too and join the rapidly expanding club of Former Socialist States.
Things may well change again Frank but for the past half a century the idea of socialism has dwindled to virtual insignificance. Mere nostalgia and fascination for a few professors and students of ancient history.
Frank
1 year ago
r'man
Things haven't changed at the very much at all. The workplace, the political sphere and communities would be recognized by anyone from a half century ago.
In fact, word is that there are actually people still alive today who lived back in the 1940's. Hard to believe I know but there it is.
Capaitalism hasn't changed at all. It still produces waste, inequality and degradation, and government bailouts when it fails, which is often.
Frank
1 year ago
Ancient history
My offspring think the 1990's are ancient history too.
You kids. Jeez
realisticman
1 year ago
Soviet Madness
"Capaitalism hasn't changed at all. It still produces waste, inequality and degradation, and government bailouts when it fails, which is often." Frank
The other man's filth is always filthier, eh Frank?
Do you know Gerd Ludwig?
"LETHAL LEGACY : POLLUTION IN THE FORMER USSR
In their ruthless drive to exploit their nation, Soviet leaders gave little thought to the health of their people or the lands that they ruled. No country is free from the scourge of pollution, but the Soviet example is one of horrifying extremes, one that stems from decades of neglect and the abuse of a vast and once beautiful land.
From Vilnius to Vladivostok, a beleaguered environment bears witness to a legacy of irresponsibility: the rivers of the former U.S.S.R. are open sewers of human and chemical waste; the Aral sea is drying up; in many Soviet c cities the air is so polluted that it puts millions at risk of respiratory diseases. Tons of nuclear waste is spread out all over the country and toxic chemicals have poisoned the soil.
Images of the bald children of Chernobyl and the limbless children
of Moscow disclose a deeply disturbing truth: birth defects and infant mortality — not just in the vicinity of a major atomic catastrophe, but even in the ailing empire's once proud capital — strike the peoples of this land at twice the rate found in the industrial nations of the West.
In pursuit of documenting this universe of pollution that comprises one-sixth of the world’s landmass, I spent 5 months on assignments for National Geographic Magazine. The result is an impressive, yet often appalling set of photographs that can serve as a lesson to us all."
Check out some pictures:
http://www.gerdludwig.com/html/stories_soviet.html
Frank
1 year ago
r'man
Your wine-induced state has left you arguing that Soviet pollution excuses the failure of capitalism.
Try again.
realisticman
1 year ago
Frank
Maybe I should have a nap. Wake me up in a hundred years and tell me how many hamlets have adopted your glorious pristine, sustainable socialism. Wanna bet how many?
Frank
1 year ago
r'man
Let me know when you square your distaste for Soviet pollution with your love of the destruction wreaked by the Alberta tar sands.
One would otherwise be excused for thinking you're being hypocritical.