Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
Today's Big Story

Harper’s Bizarre

Senate reform leaves west in the cold.

Richard Warnica 14 Dec 2006TheTyee.ca

Richard Warnica is a senior editor at The Tyee.

image atom

Newspaper editorial boards and the Canadian senate are two sides of the same coin: They’re both leftovers from another time and few know what point they serve, let alone who serves on them.

So when Stephen Harper announced his plan Wednesday for a (somewhat) elected Canadian senate, it made sense for editorialists across the country to weigh in. 

“After a century and a half, democracy will finally come to the Senate of Canada,” Harper said at a pre-campaign style open caucus meeting in Ottawa. “This bill will see voters choose their preferred candidates from to represent their provinces and territories.”

The editorialists at the National Post were first on the bandwagon. But not because they actually like the proposal. “Frankly, the Senate will still not be democratic in the literal sense,” the Post wrote. “But Mr. Harper’s proposed change, coupled with another he introduced last spring -- to limit senators’ terms to eight years -- would encourage real reform to evolve over the next decade or two.”

That theme recurred in a Sun chain editorial. “Anything would be more democratic than the current method employed to put friends of the governing party in the upper chamber,” said an editorial that appeared in London Free Press, the Edmonton Sun and other papers. “Allowing interested Canadians who qualify a chance to run for vacant positions in the Senate…is a far better solution than anything proposed by the Liberals during their last 13-year run in power -- which was nothing,”

The Globe meanwhile wrote a bait and switch editorial that purported to be about the Senate, but was really about Harper’s iron grip on that other house. “It is oddly incongruous for Mr. Harper to position himself as a champion of parliamentary reform when in government he has reverted to the same sort of high-handed tactics that he once condemned Liberal governments for using,” the Globenistas wrote in a behind the firewall piece. They added that before turning to the Senate Harper “could respect the independence of Commons committees and invest them with real oversight powers, with research budgets and professional support,  helping them to achieve that elusive “e”: effective.”

For real criticism of the bill you have to turn to people who actually sign their names when they write, like the Calgary Herald’s Don Martin. Martin argues that the bill, if passed, would be a disaster for Western Canada. “There can be no legitimacy in an electoral body where the economic powerhouse of Alberta rates far fewer seats than relatively insignificant New Brunswick,” he wrote. “Or when all four of the western provinces COMBINED only equal the Senate clout of Ontario.”

No to worry though, Martin said, the logistics of the bill are so unwieldy that it’s unlikely to ever become law. In fact, an unpassable bill may be just the issue Harper needs to collapse his government and take Canada into an election.

“Sigh. Just what we need,” Martin wrote. “A third election in three years caused by a dispute over an elected, partially reformed Senate that rarely registers as a Top 10 voter pre-occupation."

 [Tyee]

  • Share:

Facts matter. Get The Tyee's in-depth journalism delivered to your inbox for free

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion.
*Please note The Tyee is not a forum for spreading misinformation about COVID-19, denying its existence or minimizing its risk to public health.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others
  • Personally attack authors or contributors
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

Do You Think Naheed Nenshi Will Win the Alberta NDP Leadership Race?

Take this week's poll