Van City Water Still Not Safe

Perrier supply, cappuccino safety, questioned as boil water advisory enters fifth day.

By Richard Warnica, 20 Nov 2006, TheTyee.ca

Big Story

Vancouver residents drank at their own peril again Monday, as the GVRD issued a boil water advisory for the fifth consecutive day.

Writing in Monday’s Globe, Petti Fong quoted an official with the district saying that while water was less turbid yesterday, weekend rains mean it is not yet safe to drink.

So what happens when residents of Canada’s third largest city go waterless for the weekend? Perrier shortages and cappuccino scares, apparently.

Meanwhile, for those who can't afford water at $3 a litre, there's always the Salvation Army. The group is distributing 48,000 bottles of the stuff in the Downtown Eastside.

Vancouver’s blogosphere too, is wet with water talk. 

Chris Lyon who works in Seattle, never thought he’d see this situation in his native Canada. But the Microsoft employee didn’t let it ruin his trip. “Besides the water situation, Bonnie and I had a great time in Vancouver,” he wrote on his blog. “We even caught the Santa Claus parade (complete with Mounties, cowboys, and extras from Stargate SG-1)”

Derrick Thibeau, however,  wasn’t so lucky.  

“Today I did not boil my water and made two pots of coffee,” he wrote Sunday on his blog. “That was 3 hours ago. Remember Chernobyl?  Consisting of an explosion and radioactive contamination of the surrounding area? Well, it feel like there's a carpet bombing of insurgents inside my guts.”  [Tyee]

25  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Grumpy

    5 years ago

    Comments on "Van City Water Still Not Safe"

    I guess we will hear no more of Vancouver Councillor Tim Stevenson's nonsense about banning the sale of bottled water in the city!

    Seriously, isn't this a set up by the GVRD to scare more taxpayer money into expensive gold-plated projects?

  • snert

    5 years ago

    I love it. Boil the water and you still have turbid water but it doesn't have any of the bugs in it that weren't there in the first place. Why not just run it through a Brita filter or something like that. You pretty well have to do that with tap water anyhow before you drink it. The stench of chlorine is terrible.

    Maybe it could be sold as Vancouver Tea.

  • maestro

    5 years ago

    Shite happens...

    Fall, especially November, is one of the worst months for weather...its almost a GVRD tradition the water supply in the reservoirs will be affected. Lasts a few days, wait till next year. If one can't accept it as a cost of living in the GVRD, then drill a well or truck in water like Tofino did.

  • hunter

    5 years ago

    Incredible- Reports of fisticuffs at a Costco store over bottled water. What the hell are lower mainlanders going to act like when there's a real emergency to deal with? I shudder to think. The chainsaw's gassed up and ready to drop trees across the highway at Hope to keep 'em all down there.

  • lynn

    5 years ago

    Quote:
    Reports of fisticuffs at a Costco store over bottled water. What the hell are lower mainlanders going to act like when there's a real emergency to deal with?

    hey... but this is good practice for BC'er's ...a very small peek into our not so distant future...when water and power become scarce...and the people of this province finally wake up and realize how dependent life itself is on a supply of clean water...and power....and that the agenda of the Gordon Campbell government includes the sale of all the rights, the control ( meaning the right to pollute and environmentally damage)... and, of course the right to profit from our precious, indeed life-saving resources to foreign, mostly American interests.

    Et tu, Gordo?

    Need we even bother asking anymore.

  • Mooney

    5 years ago

    Funny how logging in the watershed gets no media coverage in all of this.

  • lynn

    5 years ago

    Excellent point, Mooney...but that would mean a spoon-fed press would actually have to become an investigative press to make that connection.

  • snert

    5 years ago

    Mooney

    Do a fly-over using Google Earth and there is surprisingly little evidence of any damage caused by logging. No major washouts on any of the roads at least. Of course these images are not the most recent but the do reflect a long history of logging in the watersheds.

  • RickW

    5 years ago

    snert:

    Quote:
    Why not just run it through a Brita filter or something like that

    Most countertop or undercounter filtration system cannot handle turbidity. They are all meant for clean water.

    Thing that "gets" me though, is that this was cauxed by one measley storm that wasn't even hurricane strength. What's going to happen in a REAL emergency, like earthquake, or an actual hurricane (the oceans are warming folks - makes for "interesting" weather!), or volcano, or tsunami?

    So far, everyone is angry because there was no coffee for a few days. But the hinterland is out of power after five days, and Vancouver only just had power restored. How about weeks at a time?

    I hear emergency measures people are (hastily) revising their "enough supplies for 72 hours" recommendations. Kind of shows that whatever organization we think is out there for us consists of a lot of dart-throwing..........

  • landover

    5 years ago

    Echoing others, what would happen in a REAL emergency? The press and politicians are crying wolf over nothing and thus continue to hide real infrastructure problems.

    Up to now there is not a single report of ANY micro-organism, bacteria or virus in the water. Only turbidity!!! Granted that there is greater risk of contamination but a big but, there is nothing presently unhealthy in the water except sediment.

    What crybabies!!!!

  • snert

    5 years ago

    RickW

    I never did get to try my Brita on any turbid water. We just haven't had any. Maybe a more robust way of at least pre-filtering the tap water so that most of the larger particles are removed is in order.

  • Burgess

    5 years ago

    I have lived all my life in the GVRD except for a few years in Europe. Turbid water has been a fact of life every time heavy rains have come in the Fall and Winter. We used the water and never ever got sick from its use. Why now? Money and who will reap the benefit? We all know who that is. Up until 1948 we swam in the North Arm of the Fraser until the sewer outfall were installed. THAT was when brown water became 'dirty'. So what is going on? Is it a ploy for the 'sale' of our watersheds to P3s? Increasing water rates sky high? Just remember in many North African countries water is sold on the streets by the cup. Our water is now for sale and if the 'tainted water boggy man' can be used to scare enough of us those who see $$$$$ and profit for their own interests will 'steal' our public resource with little or no trouble.

  • Fii

    5 years ago

    Frankly, it's embarrassing. I'd be curious to know, though, how much money Starbucks is losing in just five days of not selling coffee... though maybe their bottle water sales are making up for it.
    Real crisis, indeed. I was living in Taiwan in '99 when a 7.6 quake struck and we spent three nights sleeping in tents in a park due to major aftershocks coupled with sketchy building codes. It was warm but, you have to wonder- homeless people would be the ones who would deal best, wouldn't they? We would be looking to them for survival tips...

  • godsChild

    5 years ago

    Wonder what all the local microbreweries are doing... or all the bakeries supposedly using water to make dough... or restaurants serving fresh veggies... or the local hothouses...
    The whining baby in the blog sure didn't seem to mind drinking coffee out of the pot I pissed in daily at the place we used to work at. He was an idiotic, whining crybaby then and boy, is it ever nice that some thing never change...

  • Skookum1

    5 years ago

    Quote:
    I'd be curious to know, though, how much money Starbucks is losing in just five days of not selling coffee...

    Starbuck's only suspended sales for a few hours on Saturday; they were serving again by the afternoon. Their water is triple-filtered, and of course coffee and other hot-water drinks are boiled/steamed. They must have gotten a dispensation from the health authority after appealing or something; likewise all the other coffee shops who are also back in operation.

    I tried keeping water jugs as an emergency measure when I lived in an apartment tower in the West End; after about a year the plastic in the jugs "biodegraded" and I had a really wet mess in my kitchen, as well as water leakage into the suite downstairs....

    In the meantime, I'm watching the wind gust away outside, wondering when the water will clear; I've been boiling it for coffee, and making my rice in it, and washing (and drying) the dishes). But a 72-hour supply? A one-week supply? Where the hell would I put that in a 650 sq ft apartment?

  • Working Man

    5 years ago

    From what I have heard from my engineer friends over there is there is actually no danger in drinking the water. The turbidity is quite harmless and much like driking clay many people use as laxatives.

    The real concern is that one person will get a case of the runs and then run off to a lawyer and sue the GVRD for a huge sum of money.

    I connect houses to water mains every day and not one engineer has expressed any concern other than legal.

  • clubofrome

    5 years ago

    Timely ad campaign by the feds today. 72 Hours... That's what every good citizen should prepare for. 72 hours without access to power, water, food in case of any emergency. Wonder if the feds know something we don't?

  • RickW

    5 years ago

    landover:

    Quote:
    Granted that there is greater risk of contamination but a big but, there is nothing presently unhealthy in the water except sediment.

    Turbidity lessens the effectiveness of chlorine treatments, so they are upping the amount of chlorine in the system. The reason that turbidity lessens chlorine effectiveness is because it may well be combining with the carboniferous matter in the mud to form dioxins and furans.

    So while there are no organisms that may do you in, the city itself may be doing it...........in the long term.

    WM:

    Quote:
    other than legal

    You likely hit the proverbial nail on the head.

    Or maybe it's all a plot by the bottled water people..........

  • dangrice.com

    5 years ago

    As long as we don't have to boil the beer! But really, worldwide weather has being getting more chaotic recently and its it looks like mankind isn't that innocent.

  • DNA

    5 years ago

    It would be useful to have a report on the research which has changed the actions of our public health authorities. Until now, we were told dirty water was safe - just let it stand and settle out. Now we are told that bacteria and small organisms can cling to particles of mud and "hide" from the chlorine. However, none of this has been found in water tested to date - so it appears the water would not harm anyone if consumed. What is this research? Is it one paper or a change in the general consensus of public health authorities? Has anyone ever been harmed by Vancouver's drinking water? Anyone know?

  • RickW

    5 years ago

    DNA:
    WM likely has it right...........it's lawyerus pestilensus, one of the worst viruses to infect mankind!

  • incredulous

    5 years ago

    So is anyone else angry about the breakdown of this basic service? I mean, who the hell do we lynch!?!

    How is it that in this day and age in Canada, we do not have potable water for weeks potentially? Weeks!?!? How does a city of the size of Vancouver not have even rudimentary water filtration capabilities?

    Forget the inconvenience or how much Starbucks lost - as a matter of principle I'm disgusted at the sheer breakdown in accountability in the GVRD.

  • RickW

    5 years ago

    Ain't it amazing how angry we ain't.....?

    Being a conspiracy theorist, this is yet another spoke in the wheel of "people control" -- along the lines of Orwell's 1984, except "kinder, gentler".

  • Skookum1

    5 years ago

    The news networks keep on saying that there have been no reports of illness. I think this is b.s. as I know people who've been sick; sure they didn't go to their doctors or the hospital, but they definitely went to pharmacists. But pharmacists can't serve as epidemiologists, granted. My suspicion on this is if they admit there have been health problems it opens the GVRD wide open for a class action suit.....

  • RickW

    5 years ago

    Well, if not 1984, then how about The Net?
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113957/
    Ya know the part where the bad guys play around with airline schedules and stuff............?

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.