Opinion

Where Was the Media?

I tried to raise key election issues. Some big enviro groups, and most reporters, looked away.

By Rafe Mair, 18 May 2009, TheTyee.ca

Rafe Mair and Tzeporah Berman

Tzeporah Berman, Rafe Mair: Who's message got airplay?

As the provincial election unfolded, we saw serious rifts exposed in the environmental movement. Where does it go now after the massive Campbell win, ratifying his plans to ravage our seas and rivers?

In the vacuum created by that rift, the news media of B.C. utterly failed in its duty to inform the voters about critical environmental issues.

As a result, Campbell will assume a mandate to bring in more fish farms, increase the capacity of those in existence and continue a massive destruction of our rivers.

Premier Campbell was able to campaign without having to meet these issues head on and this strategy was clear to me as I taunted his ministers to debate with me.

Where was the energy minister? There is no doubt in my mind that an integral part of Campbell's strategy was to get rid of Richard Neufeld, the former energy minister, so that he would not be seen to be avoiding debate. Instead, a new minister could duck a fight because he was so recent an appointment.

Movement divided, media muted

If there is an environmental movement it was sent asunder by the defection of Tzeporah Berman and David Suzuki, who seemed to tell us that destruction of rivers for power was helpful to the cause of lowering carbon emissions into the atmosphere. Indeed there seemed to be an inference, if not a direct statement, that they alone represented environmental legitimacy, an arrogant assumption of leadership.

They were accredited by the media as the environmental aristocracy before whom the rest of us should cringe in fear and humility. There were exceptions. The talk shows at CKNW and CFUN did permit contrary views, as did some community papers. But you would have looked in vain in the mainstream news media to see what we were on about.

And what was our message?

That so-called "run of river projects" permanently and seriously impact our rivers and streams to make electricity which we, through our crown corporation, BC Hydro, must buy at double or more the "spot" market price.

That this power, because most of it can only be produced when the spring runoff occurs, is of almost no use domestically and must be exported. This was confirmed by the CEO of the Plutonic/General Electric partnership who said a person "would have had to be in a coma" not to know that this power was for export.

And that Hydro now owes $31 billion to those private power companies who now have a contract -- a sum that will hugely increase as more and more private projects get approved.

With so much at stake, you would think this would be an issue that public affairs shows would want to explore at some point during the election.

Fanny, can't you spare a spot?

Yet, to offer one example of the frustrations I faced as I travelled around the province speaking on this issue, I was consistently denied the opportunity to appear on the Fanny Kiefer Show on Shaw Cable.

I began to wonder if this was because Shaw Cable is the major shareholder of Corus Entertainment, the owners of CKNW, who fired me in 2003 and have airbrushed me from their history and to this date deny me access to the 20th and 21st floor of the TD building.

When I shared my thinking with Fanny it was not she but Shaw Cable who, in a letter one might send to an uneducated bumpkin, stated that this wasn't so. As they considered this issue and it became clear, in the fullness of time and at the end of the day...they might well ask me to appear. Like much of the media in general, Shaw Cable simply refused to deal with the serious allegations Save Our Rivers Society was raising throughout the province.

CBC and Canwest

I do a regular political panel on Monday mornings on CBC radio and I begged for a year to have this issue and the fish farms debacle on the agenda. They never were unless I crammed it into an answer to an entirely different question. I was told that last week they did an entire program on it but in spite of the fact that I'm a CBC "regular," as official spokesperson for Save Our Rivers Society, I was not invited. (I expect after saying this I will be let go as part of their budget cuts.)

Again and again I asked political columnists Vaughn Palmer of the Sun and Mike Smyth of the Province to deal with this issue but not a peep. If what I said was wrong, surely the media would have said so and why.

Last Fall I went to Terrace to speak on this issue and, before I left, was interviewed by a reporter for the local radio station. When I got to the public meeting the woman who interviewed me told me (and she was prepared to be identified) that the interview had not been used because the manager of the station thought it might offend Alcan.

A few weeks ago I was in Castlegar to give a speech at an NDP fundraiser and the Black newspaper failed to cover my speech or interview me.

Laurel for Mark Hume

The only senior member of the print media (apart from a few courageous community papers) to deal with this issue at all was Mark Hume of the Globe and Mail. Indeed, the Globe, in its B.C. section, covers B.C. issues better than the two local Canwest papers combined.

During the 14 months I was traveling the province, speaking to full houses, nary one "journalist" from the two main Vancouver dailies and Global-BCTV, ever asked me a single question. Save Our Rivers Society, who hired me in part because I'm a broadcaster with a Michener Award, the Bruce Hutchison Lifetime Award winner and member of the Broadcaster's Hall of Fame, might just as well hired a fencepost with hair for all the attention the media paid this issue.

It's not about me

Perhaps I flatter myself in thinking that the media should report what I say. But the charges I made were serious. If I was right, they should have reported that. If I was wrong, then so were scientists like Alexandra Morton, Dr. Craig Orr, John Calvert, Dr Marvin Schaffer, Dr Marvin Rosenau, Mark Angelo, Dr Neil Frazer and Otto Langer.

Think on it again -- Save Our Rivers Society maintained that the Campbell government:

1) Encourages large corporations to ruin our rivers to produce electricity

2) Under long term contracts, forces BC Hydro to pay two or three times the export value with the price indexed to the market

3) The electricity, because of the time of year it's produced, is of virtually no value for our own needs and thus must be exported by BC Hydro at a crippling loss.

None of this adds up to an important public issue at election time?

The environmental questions raised by myself and much of the scientific community are so serious that only a media utterly derelict in their duty could fail to challenge them or give them full and fair coverage. In fact, on the day of the election the Vancouver Sun printed an op-ed piece extolling the virtues of private power by an executive of a private power producer!

The fundamental moral duty of journalism to inform the public was all but utterly overlooked by the mainstream media in this province, denying to the public the information they needed to make an informed election decision.

Related Tyee stories:

 [Tyee]

112  Comments:

  • JollyRoger

    18-05-2009

    Media bias and the urban/rural divide

    I can't believe how much media bias there was... based on what stories were covered... or rather NOT. I can't believe how many people were so gullible.

    Maybe people in the big cities would think differently if we had Run of River projects in their backyard. We laugh at New Yorkers who grow up not knowing where their food really comes from (other than a grocery store). But increasingly urbanites have lost touch with not only where their food comes from, but also how it gets there (trucks don't run on electricity!) They don't know what quarry the concrete in their condo came from, how much greenhouse gases were released by cement kilns, and what forests the lumber in their houses came from. They don't know where their sewage goes and how much of it isn't treated (eg. Annacis plant released raw untreated sewage on 8 separate days in 2006), yet will point the finger at boaters. They don't know where their garbage gets sent out to.

    If people are thinking 100-mile diet for their food, they should also include everything else: power, water, energy, sewage, garbage, building materials. Then they'll realize just how much their eco-footprint has been stomping on rural BC who happened to vote predominantly against the Liberals (except for the oil/gas areas near Alberta).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bc09.PNG

    Until there is a shift from tertiary information (eg. the big media) to firsthand information (eg. ordinary people out in the field), the public will be prone to misinformation and propaganda. I'm hoping the Internet will allow those firsthand stories to be told, to be read, and to be recorded when they're ignored.

  • Barryeng

    18-05-2009

    Northern Run of the River

    It gets worse. If you look at the map of proposed IPP projects north of Terrace, and then the map of the proposed "Northern Connector" extension of the B.C. Hydro power line from Terrace north to Bob Quinn Lake, There are striking similariries. It becomes obvious that B.C. Hydro (taxpayers like you and me), are going to have to pay for this hydro line, so that the IPPs have access to the north american power grid.

    The claim that the power line is meant to enable thousands of new mining jobs strikes me as patently false. We will end up paying for something far more sinister.

  • Grumpy

    18-05-2009

    The environmental community............

    ........is in shambles as Berman and Suzuki took their 30 pieces of silver.

    We live in evil days as Campbell and his corporate whores will destroy this province.

    The mainstream media are abetting this fiasco and should be judged "enemies of the state", the new Pravda of the Western world.

    No one gives a damn except that they get their profit.

    The real problem is that over 50% of the people saw this election as illegitimate and did not vote. Illegitimate governments are overthrown by revolution; the question is will the revolution be quiet or violent?

  • cboo44

    18-05-2009

    Politics of Fear

    Welcome to the politics of fear, Rafe. "Giveaway Gordo" just outmaneuvered you and his fear tactics were more effective than yours. B.C. is corporately controlled and they have "Giveaway Gordo" in their hip pocket. When it comes to influence, you are but a voice in the wilderness that will soon be "Private Property, No Trespassing".
    Suzuki has been "outed" for what he always has been, a psuedo-environmentalist who is really all about the money. He supported Giveaway Gordo because his "foundation" has been BOUGHT with "government" contracts and in turn, "donated" to the Liberal campaign fund.
    We(and you) are done like a dinner.

  • Hughes

    18-05-2009

    Call it Democracy

    See the paid-off local bottom feeders
    Passing themselves off as leaders
    Kiss the ladies shake hands with the fellows
    Open for business like a cheap bordello

    And they call it democracy...
    Bruce Cockburn

    I agree the mainstream media has proven itself incompetent and negligent by way of its lack of balanced reporting, but that’s to be expected – you don’t bite the hand that feeds you – right? Business is business despite the viscosity of the unctuousness.

    That said, the MSM cannot be held entirely responsible for the environmental Armageddon British Columbians are facing under this regime – the NDP’s campaign team and strategists have proven themselves just as incompetent as the MSM – an utter disaster.

    But what is truly horrifying in the aftermath of this election is that Campbell, the arrogant despot that he is, will continue with his slash ‘n’ burn campaign across the province claiming all the while that he has a mandate to govern as he sees fit, despite garnering support from only 22% of the eligible voting population.

    Democracy is the recurrent suspicion that more than half of the people are right more than half of the time. E. B. White

    Not in BC!

  • ifsandsnbutts

    18-05-2009

    The media...

    was likely wherever the Liberals told them to be. I was, and still am, so angry at the mainstream media of BC. The ONLY places to find the truth were here at the Tyee, and bloggers sites!

    I have cancelled my subscriptions to both BC newspapers permanently. It's pretty obvious that CanWest is charging us for their product, while doing the bidding of their bosses in government, both federal and provincial. They can all take a hike as far as I'm concerned. I wish the Tyee would print a paper version of their site - I would subscribe to that for life.

    As for Berman and Suzuki - they need to remember that what goes around, comes around. One day their faces will be covered with egg...and their will be no explanation good enough to have true environmentalists forget what they said and did this election. My heart hurts for the scientists in this article - their frustration must be unbearable.

  • Skywalker

    18-05-2009

    Agreed!

    Forty-five percent of the 53.5 percent who voted think that the end justifies the means. They are quite happy to listen to CanWest because the result is just what they wanted. They will just claim the other 42 percent just don't know how to win elections and are whining. The truth will be sacrificed.

    The whole thing is moronic. Truth is suppose to be the guiding light in society. Truth is suppose to set us free. People just don't realize how dangerously perverted our society has become.

  • southdeltawalker

    18-05-2009

    They move faster than a river...

    Say goodbye to everything you love about
    B C.
    This was issued on Thurs. May 14.

    So called environmental assessment for the Bute Inlet project.
    First step in it's destruction.

    "To all Interested Parties:

    Please find attached the News Release announcing the decision of the Minister of the Environment, the Honourable Jim Prentice, to refer the proposed Bute Inlet Hydroelectric project to a federal panel review. The Minister also issued the Panel Terms of Reference (http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/050/document-eng.cfm?documentID=34360) and approved the joint federal-provincial document entitled ''Guidelines for the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement'' (http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/050/document-eng.cfm?documentID=34359).

    The next steps in the review process include:

    Announcement of the availability of participant funding: May 2009
    Appointment of panel members by Minister of the Environment: end of Summer 2009
    Submission of the Environmental Impact Statement by the proponent: Fall 2009
    All documents related to this environmental assessment can be viewed on the project public registry at the following link: http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/050/details-eng.cfm?cear_id=44825

    If you have any questions on the federal environmental assessment process, please e-mail us at the following address:

    Sincerely,
    Marie-France Therrien
    Panel Manager | Gestionnaire de commissions

    Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency | Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
    160 Elgin St. Ottawa ON K1A 0H3 | 160, rue Elgin, Ottawa ON K1A 0H3

    Telephone | Téléphone 1-866-582-1884
    Facsimile | Télécopieur 613-957-0941
    Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada
    P Do you really need to print this e-mail? Please think of the environment!|Avez-vous réellement besoin d'imprimer ce courriel? S.V.P. Pensons à l'environnement!
    c"

  • Van Isle

    18-05-2009

    The mass-media has been

    The mass-media has been covering up for Campbell since he was mayor of Vancouver. The average voter doesn't give a tinkers damn for this province, all they care about is jingle in their pockets. As for a revolution I don't think it'll happen cuz the average Joe is so weak-kneed and to a certain degree, is ignorant on what our Governments have been/is doing behind our backs. I still maintain that Gordo's past will come to haunt him in the very near future and expect protests/demonstrations to follow, hopefully next February when the world's media is in town.

  • southdeltawalker

    18-05-2009

    Plutonic power Re: Enviro Assessment

    Press release from Plutonic Power:

    "Plutonic Power Welcomes Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Federal Panel Review Process for Proposed Bute Inlet Hydroelectric Project
    VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(Marketwire - May 15, 2009) - Plutonic Power Corporation (TSX:PCC) has received notice that Canadian Environment Minister Jim Prentice has directed that an environmental assessment of the Bute Inlet Hydroelectric Project shall occur under a federal panel review process. The 1,027 megawatt non storage hydroelectric project is located in the headwaters of the Homathko, Southgate and Orford Rivers systems draining into Bute Inlet approximately 150 kilometers north of Powell River on the southwest coast of British Columbia.

    "Undergoing a federal panel review provides Plutonic Power certainty of process for the Bute Inlet Hydroelectric Project, in addition to giving stakeholders a clear opportunity for input into Project design and mitigation plans," said Plutonic Power Corporation Vice-Chair and CEO, Donald McInnes. "We believe the comprehensive nature of the coordinated federal and provincial environmental assessment processes will result in a project that is designed to accommodate and mitigate impacts and concerns of the public, local communities, government agencies and stakeholder groups."

    Various aspects of the Bute Inlet Hydroelectric Project infrastructure is located within the traditional territory of the Homalco Nation - including all generation sites and transmission, with additional transmission infrastructure in Klahoose, Sliammon and Sechelt First Nation territories. "We look forward to working with our First Nations Partners on this important aspect of the project review," added McInnes.

    Plutonic Power's proposed Bute Inlet Hydroelectric Project is comprised of 17 non storage run-of-river sites on three river systems, with an approximate generation capacity of 1,027 megawatts that would create enough energy to meet the annual electricity needs of about 300,000 homes. Plutonic expects to make its initial application for an environmental assessment certificate early in 2010....."

  • Jeffrey J.

    18-05-2009

    Ball in in Our Court

    Thank you Rafe for a crisp, accurate summary of the deeply flawed BC political/economic system. You are 100% correct. So what should people do? That is the real issue.

    First, it is important to realize that this is EXACTLY how democracy has been hijacked in most parts of North America and elsewhere in the world. BC isn't the first, and won't be the last. We all should read Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine to understand the system in place.

    Secondly, change CAN occur. But it won't be delivered to us from the elites as a gift. Democratic rights and social justice have NEVER been granted from above, but earned through citizen organization and hard work. Just look to Bolivia, Venezuela, Haiti and many, many other locations where people have stood up to corrupt power.

    Thirdly, in BC, unlike Haiti, we still have the right to protest, to assemble, to organize, to publish, to march, to seek change. Yes, it means turning off our TV and canceling the cable. Sitting in front of the boob tube has been an effective foil for citizen participation. It's the first place I'd start for those who want to become more involved. Without citizen mobilization, however, there will be no change. That's for sure.

  • carfreed

    18-05-2009

    Berman and BC greens

    I attended on SaltSpring Island, a talk by the 2 Warriors for our Rivers. Rafe, the elder, and Damien, the younger gave an excellent presentation. Talk, fims and responses were to the point.
    Next I attended an excellent Rally in Nanaimo. A best ever.
    Even tho, our excellent NDP candidate lost by a mere 395 votes to Murray Coell,the Greens still got their vote out for themselves rather than for the wild salmon and the rivers,and social programs.
    What a serious let down to these people who worked 24/7 to get the info out.
    Liberal MPs basically sat in comfy chairs at home,watching the news.
    Berman and Suzuki should have been warning about how close this election would be and that the NDP would be more open and accessible than any Liberal caucus will ever be.
    But, the NDP and Carole James should have maintained flexibility about the carbon tax.
    Now we will have to get more poster paint.
    Oh well, I guess the Enviro groups will get their funding to keep them employed.

  • KWD

    18-05-2009

    democracy lost

    The post-vote analysis, that claims voter apathy is somehow connected to a general satisfaction with the status quo, is extremely misleading.

    It is claimed that those who prefer the status quo – and voted to avoid change, because they have the most to lose – comprised the bulk of those that voted.

    However, although that logic may fit the observed outcome, it doesn’t explain why more than fifty percent of the eligible electorate – the financially less fortunate and less able to prosper under the status quo – shunned the polls.

    Yes, the MSM and corporate world played a big part in “dumbing down” voters and keeping them away from the polls, but their failure to engage in debate and give equal time to both sides of the story is only part of a much larger problem.

    If the MSM were being completely truthful, they would admit that the real reason behind the apathy is the fact that our political system is actually becoming less and less democratic. And they would also admit that the reason we have a problem with our democracy is incontestable: capitalism abhors democracy.

    Because globalization has ensured that bottom-line thinking takes precedence over policies that favour the greater “good”, many so-called democratic systems have become Dollar Democracies, where one dollar equals one vote. So it’s understandable that so many – those that aren’t able to engage in and enjoy the benefits of the corporate good life – avoided voting; they’ve seen, all too clearly, that whether they participate or not, the existing system will not act in their best interest. So why vote?

    Voter apathy in BC has little to do with differences in political platform, or the carbon tax, or how parties will deal with the global economic collapse. Over 50% of the electorate believe the present system has successfully disenfranchised those that most need a share of the wealth and a voice in how wealth is distributed.

  • BC Mary

    18-05-2009

    It was no ordinary election, this was The Battle for B.C.

    I felt pretty damn bad after the BC election. It wasn't simply an electoral loss, it was (like Rafe says) knowing we have lost Beautiful British Columbia. Well ... not quite yet. It ain't over til we the people say it's over.

    Gradually I began to realize what a splendid fight the Progressives like Rafe, Alexandra Morton, bloggers like me, and so many others had put up. We fought 4 powerful, insidious, wealthy, nearly invisible "enemies". They were:

    * the Green Party, which did for Gordo what Ralph Nader did for George W Bush,
    * the Public Affairs Bureau which, with $31million a year of taxpayers' money, teaches us to love Gordo's Golden Era,
    * Bill 42 which made it impossible for 5% of voters to cast their ballots,
    * CanWest's appalling bias which Rafe Mair has explained so well in this article. I'll mention only one story which they didn't publish: the trial, verdict, and sentencing of the guy police were tracking when they raided the BC Legislature. Amazing, and very suspect.

    Progressives fought all that and Gordo's Gang too. Didn't win but fought 'em to a standstill. I say that's a huge victory. I can well appreciate the depths of despair Rafe is feeling, but I gotta say: The progressives put up a great defence ... and that work must continue.

  • RossK

    18-05-2009

    I Was A Aghast When...

    ...I heard Mr. Mair state, unequivocally on one of the morning CBC Radio One 'panels' where provincial election issues were being ostensibly 'discussed' that we wasn't allowed to actually discuss IPP.

    Aghast, I tell you.

    The CanWest media monopoly that, as Rafe has pointed out in the past, contributed $50,000 exclusively to the BC Liberal Party in the last election cycle is one thing...

    But the CBC?

    This is truly outrageous, especially given that the reason I am willing to support the CBC with my tax dollars is because it is supposed to provide us with a full range of points of view that are in no way beholden to the special interests of commercial media outlet owners and/or their advertisers.

    _____
    And BC Mary above makes a great point....despite the deck being stacked against us, we still came close...more independet media with the growth of outlets like The Tyee and Public Eye, and an active bloggosphere that really pushes from the bottom (and raises money) could make the difference next time.

  • Yammer

    18-05-2009

    The "Media" did not nominate Carole James

    But by all means, let us keep dancing around this issue.

    James is apparently pondering her future leadership. Why??? It is not as though anything about her screamed viable premier of BC.

    It annoys me that as soft a target as Gordo gets through election after election. Instead of blaming the media or the Greens, why don't we blame ourselves for not getting a messenger who can actually carry a progressive message?

    The NDP ran a shocking campaign. They are utterly disorganized and deserved to lose. The TV ad showing Gordo with fruity classical music, declaring him to be a friend of the fruity classical music lovers, and not the solid, manly, gas-tax-and classical-music-hating reg'lar folk, is the new standard of self-eviscerating ad campaigns. Way to diss the intellectual class that is, frankly, the core NDP supporter, NOT the average "working family" dude, who still actually aspires to being one of the rich and therefore is inherently drawn to the pro-business party.

    Ah who cares, she was just keeping the seat warm for Gregor.

    But if lessons are not learned...

  • seth

    18-05-2009

    Palmer on Jon Stewart - The future

    All of you who watched Wall Street media celeb Jim Cramer getting a butt kicking from Jon Steward over his shilling for Wall Street Pirates, can envision Palmer and his Canwest sidekicks getting the same beating from some new media star after our power rates double and triple to pay for our power purchases from Cramer's Wall Street Pirates and a lot of our industry has migrated south to enjoy cheap nuclear and solar power.

    Remember when BC Ferries was deciding to buy foreign ferries for a few hundred million, Palmer wearing his industrial/marine engineers hat, had the cost of building ferries in BC detailed out almost to the last roll of toilet paper. Curiously with numbers in the 60 billion region (37 firm + 23 non firm) for probable committed power purchases Palmer's power engineering hat is still gathering dust in his closet.

    What I don't understand is why the Tyee's Will McMartin who is so good at this type of analysis has so far not gone there. It would be easy for him to show the BCLiberals on this issue to be the most incompetent financial managers in Canadian history.

    http://publicpowerissues.blogspot.com/2009/05/pirate-power-ripoff.html

    Have a look at the blog comments above for my battle with pirate power's THE DONALD

    and also at Scott Simpson's blog at the Sun

    http://communities.canada.com/vancouversun/blogs/energy/default.aspx

    For my back and forth with Scott and an IPP shill on the issue.

    Publicpowerissues makes the case that because the current spot price and new tech solar and nuclear options are so coming in so cheap - down to 1 cent a kwh near term - that potentially that almost all the taxpayer's billions will be lost.

    Imagine if Microsoft's Paul Allen's investment in pulse fusion pays off . Ten years from now Americans might be building gas station size fusion plants generating baseload power at tiny fraction's of a cent a kwh while Gordon Campbell has us committed to 35 more years of 12 cents a kwh of unreliable summertime flows that even we can't use and certainly won't be able to sell.

    Given the uncertainty in future costs would it not be much more prudent for BCHydro to build run of the river and dam projects five or ten years down the line when the recession ends, power needs increase, and nuclear/solar costs firm up?

    Westinghouse is just beginning construction of four gigawatt class generation 3.5 nukes that is sold for China for $5 billion. Had BCHydro bought the plants instead of China they could have been located on the Burrard thermal site, generating almost 40000 gigawatthours annually of prime baseload power with no emissions whatsoever at 2 cents a kwh, no transmission costs, and no destroyed or flooded rivers and land. Compare that to Plutonic's Bute which will cost taxpayers $16 billion generating 3000 gigawatts hour of power of unreliable early summer power and up to 45,000 hectares of land.

  • gaulois

    18-05-2009

    And then Judge gets reassigned/promoted

    The lamest coverage was provided on this BC railgate event this past week-end courtesy of CanWest. Not sure if CBC bothered covering yet.

    I was hoping that my observation puts Rafe's story in perspective...

  • seth

    18-05-2009

    Stop the Greens - Here's how

    I agree with Yammer that the level of competence the NDP has shown by picking Carol James in the first place and running one of the stupidest election campaigns in decades, requires a massive purging.

    The party never really addressed the massive already committed and soon to be committed post election Pirate power losses to taxpayers. Two billion a year or eight fast ferry fiascos annually for the next forty years. Yet they let Campbell claim the best economic manager prize by forfeit.

    In speaking with my non political working class buddies, they refused to vote for James with names for her like shrill, just can't stand her, harpy, witch, bitch, ugly and ball breaker.

    Given the utter idiocy of those comments, sadly the NDP must realize that it is impossible to get working class male or female voters to get out and vote for a woman unless she is a spokesmodel Sarah Palin type babe. George Bush was elected and reelected by working class types, who were the major recipients of the Bush crime family shaft.

    Another issue that must be dealt with is the defanging of the Green party. I suggest all greenish sort of progressives join the Green Party en mass and at the next convention vote for a resolution and leadership to end the party's participation in elections.

    A duplicate effort on the federal side is also urgent as we must try to stop the well meaning fools who somehow control the federal party before an imminent federal election

  • Chris Bouris

    18-05-2009

    The means and the ends achieved

    A strident and shrill style can desensitize as effectively and completely as any mainstream media. The reek of an authoritative or pedantic voice - and particularly a disrespectful one towards a named "villain" annoys all - except a like minded-choir.
    Vilification and fear are the means of repression, thus how can one call oneself and actually be “progressive” - and expect to be effective - if employing the same means?

    The only change comes of inspiration, and only then can the majority of others easily and willingly rally to it. Look south.

  • VivianLea Doubt

    18-05-2009

    blogosphere pushes from the bottom?

    Some points I’d like to make [again] here: Stats Canada on the “Digital Divide” –“the lowest income groups continue to lose ground vis-a-vis the high income groups" – referring to access to internet connections. And from Elections Canada (2002 report): “higher income is associated with higher voting frequency”. When we talk about the internet mobilizing the troops, then, we should be clear it is the middle income and above, by and large, that we are talking about. While I don’t want to discourage the ‘blogosphere’, they don’t reach to the ‘bottom’.

    As Rafe has very capably pointed out, neither can we rely on the mass media to get our ‘message’ out, and that brings us to an obvious conclusion: it will be the hard and endless work of talking to people and making personal connections that stands to broaden a ‘progressive’ constituency across the province.

    Another quote from the Elections Canada report reads: “To the extent people are declining the opportunities to vote in Canada, they are also demonstrating a lowered commitment to the Canadian community.” Now Robert Putnam has written about this decline in ‘social capital’ in the US (I forget the name of the Canadian sociologist and his research here); it is certainly well-documented – it seems to me that the only way to reverse the trend is to build social capital. I’d say that means the old cliché of grassroots organizing. The “democracy deficit” is real and growing as KWD points out. If progressives truly want to remedy this, we must start by talking to people who don’t vote, because clearly we are not speaking in their voice.

    As a kind of postscript, in my small apartment building two of us out of twenty or so that live here voted. Coincidentally, only two of us have internet connections.

  • Wilfred Laurier

    18-05-2009

    Nonsense

    "That this power, because most of it can only be produced when the spring runoff occurs, is of almost no use domestically and must be exported"

    Rafe, this statement is nonsense. The power generated but RoR is MORE in spring. If there is flow, there is generation.It allows dams to be filled and then the power from the dams sold to the USA in the summer. This is the kind of stuff that pays for education and health. What in God's name is wrong with exporting power to the USA and what could possibly be wrong with the carbon credits they will generate under cap and trade? Utter bollocks! We all need to eat, Rafe. No wonder the NDP is seen as hopeless in managing an economy!

    When I see misinformation like this, is it any wonder the Liberals won?

  • Kam Lee

    18-05-2009

    gordo

    Well the election wasn't lost, it was stolen. The local rags, who do not give us news, but spreads the lies about a drunk, druggie, womanizer, lier, as well as a thief. I have been working against the local rags for nine months now. I have been asking friends, relatives,fellow workers, etc to give up their papers. I can't call the "news" papers, because they are not. So far, I have over 140 canceled subscriptions to the sun / province. They seem to be the spearhead for the lieberals power. I will continue, and respectfully ask others to take the lead, and lets get his propaganda machine knocked down to their knees. Its hard work,but well worth it. Lets work harder to bring gordo down, before he sells the entire province. By the way NW, the big smell is next on my hit list. Keep up the good work Rafe.

  • Amor de Cosmos

    18-05-2009

    environmental split

    In my view,the split in the environmental movement, the low voter turn-out, and the close losses in so many key constituencies are all related.

    I also feel that the primary responsibility for the above rests with the current, ahem, leadership of the NDP. This would include James/Farnworth/Dix/BC Fed/Tieleman etc.

    Given the failure of STV, I also agree with those above who feel that a major internal change (if not a purge) has to occur within the NDP. Control of the party has to be taken over by a new generation of members and leadership that doesn't buy into the doctrinaire and morally ambiguous approach to politics and society represented by the current bunch.

    Left versus right is dead. "Sound-bite" politics is dead. Green versus brown is dead. Union versus non-union is dead. Rural as manipulatable is dead. Power as a legitimate end in itself is dead.

    Democracy, by its nature, must be participatory if its gonna work. Enough b*llsh*t already.

  • biscotti

    18-05-2009

    Who wants to stake a claim?

    ...for a small, guerrilla style, faux private power project on a creek, say, in Burnaby?

    Set up a tiny toy turbine, make an application for an assessment, have a Board of Directors with creative noms de plumes and get the story in the urban MSM's face. Time for some creative, non-violent direct action on this issue.

    Lots of excellent comments on this thread.

    btw I seem to recall that PM Laurier campaigned FOR reciprocity (aka "Free" Trade a la NAFTA) with the US and lost to Borden. So if his "ghost" thinks Rafe is "at the end of the line", maybe that's a compliment ;-)

    For my part, I was very happy to have had the chance to hear you, Rafe, in PG. Thanks for all your work on this. It's by no means over.

  • VivianLea Doubt

    18-05-2009

    agree/disagree

    "Left versus right is dead. "Sound-bite" politics is dead. Green versus brown is dead. Union versus non-union is dead. Rural as manipulatable is dead. Power as a legitimate end in itself is dead."

    This is the part I can agree with, Amor de Cosmos. As to the "primary responsibility" for all the problems of the world resting with the current leadership of the NDP, well, let's get a grip, shall we? Voter turnout has, albeit slowly, been declining since the 2nd World War. The split in the environmental movement was orchestrated by a few high profile pseudo-environmentalists for reasons of their own...And the close outcomes in many ridings very likely reflect the low voter turnout.

    Yeah, enough bulls**t, already...and enough personal attacks on anybody. We must all do what we can, what we are capable of in whatever fashion we are able, and stop blaming/hating/messaging ad infinitum.

  • Wilfred Laurier

    18-05-2009

    Blame Game.....

    "Well the election wasn't lost, it was stolen."

    Blame everybody but yourself. It's easier than taking responsibility for your mistakes.

    "We must all do what we can, what we are capable of in whatever fashion we are able, and stop blaming/hating/messaging ad infinitum."

    Well said. It isn't called the "loony left" for no reason.

  • Van Isle

    18-05-2009

    I hear you Kam Lee, from now

    I hear you Kam Lee, from now on I'm going to try to boycot all CKNW advertisers. (It's kinda hard to boycot BC Hydro) As far as the Province and Sun newspapers, I haven't read them in years.

  • VivianLea Doubt

    18-05-2009

    hate messaging

    "It isn't called the "loony left" for no reason."

    I'll back my credentials against yours anytime, dear one.

  • Roisin Dubh

    18-05-2009

    Media Bias

    A Chilliwack:John Les, Liberal candidate,now re - elected, placed an advertisement in the two local papers "The Chilliwack Times"(CanWest) and "Chilliwack Progress"(Black Press) on May 1.This ad used the logo of the University of the Fraser Valley and material realating to UFV to suggest most strongly that that institution had endorsed him.I know that a publicly funded institution can "endorse"neither candidate nor party.I phoned office of president of UFV to enquire if somehow UFV had indeed "endorsed"Les. NO, they had not and on May 4 had sent a letter to both editors as denial ; however neither paper printed that letter.The Times did print a letter from a private person, who obviously had inside knowledge and took exception to the ad.I then wrote a "letter the editor" of both papers,maintaining that suppression of the official denial was wrong and showed bias towards Les. Only the Times replied, saying that the letter from the private person explained the situation and CHASTISED LES FOR HIS DISHONESTY!The official UFV letter was never intended for publication but merely for the private instruction of the editors of both papers!If this does not display bis and intellectual dishonesty I am a hottentot!

  • seth

    18-05-2009

    Wilfred's School of Neocon Economics

    or Buy High Sell Low

    Wilf tells us that that Pirate power allows dams to be filled and then the power from the dams sold to the USA in the summer

    By way of contradiction this from BC Hydro's 2008 annual report "....By the second quarter,however, persistent high inflows into the large basins resulted in high volumes of energy sales to avoid the need to spill."

    BCHydro too gets 60% of its flow during the freshet. Early summer power consumption is very low so BC Hydro quickly fills its' dams and is exporting like crazy during the freshet. All pirate power during this time period would have to be exported.

    BCHydro will be buying the bulk of its pirate power at rates between 9.5 and 12 cents a kwh in 40 year contracts. The current spot price is around 2.5 cents a kwh and solar and nuclear power developments show that price holding over the near to mid term then dropping precipitously in the long term.

    Yes, we all need to eat and unfortunately Gordo is seeing to it that we don't. No wonder the NDP is seen as hopeless in managing an economy by Neocons who think buying at 12 cents a kwh and selling at 2 cents is a good deal.

  • wiley

    18-05-2009

    self-defeatism?

    Hey Rafe, what's this self-defeatism about a "massive Campbell win, ratifying his plans to ravage our seas and rivers?"

    Looks to me like the NDP pretty much won all the coast ridings where tarsands pipeline ports, festering fish farms and mega-RoR plans are located, so the Liberators haven't won much at all.

    Let's hear it for socialism and solidarity! We'll still be here when the capitalists fall on their swords after losing the limelite of the Olympix.

    Just because our pathetic, undemocratic and moribund electoral system still gives a weak minority govt. dictatorial powers, it doesn't give these kleptomaniac bastards the social license to keep ripping us off.

  • edward01ca

    18-05-2009

    Media Bias In Election

    I presume that everyone knows that both CTV and the Canwest Global are both neoconservative and hence support Gordon Campbell and Stephen Harper in everything they do. As a person who is intrigued by conspiracy theories, how about this one: The permanent election date was set to be in the middle of the hockey playoffs guaranteeing that the CBC would present a very poor coverage of the election because of hockey game committments. This would leave all media coverage to supports of the neocons. Think about it.

  • lynn

    18-05-2009

    Thanks

    Great post, Kam Lee....I believe in boycotts as well....because they work.

    Rafe,

    Thanks for all your hard work on behalf of the wild salmon and rivers.

    You made a real difference by turning up, body and soul, to rally support for the above in so many towns across BC. It is much appreciated.

    As Wiley reveals, the coast ridings and Vancouver Island pretty much rejected the BC Liberals, despite the mainstream media's relentless cheerleading of the Campbell forces and despite, as you aptly note, their shameful negligence of their "moral duty" as journalists "to inform the public".

    We forge on.

    Thanks again.

  • seth

    18-05-2009

    Kim Lee - list of advertisers

    Send it along we'd all like to see it. Jim Sinclair from the BC Fed could maybe get out a warm edict asking members to not buy from these odious organizations.

    And those of you who still watch the TV Canwest Global is off your channel list, as well as the Province and Sun newspapers.

  • dave49

    18-05-2009

    Question, then answer.... ...?

    Rafe,

    Thank you for all your efforts on behalf of what you think is right. You are a fine citizen.

    As for "Where Was the Media?", perhaps it is time to accept that your tactics don't work any more. You're being shunned and will continue to be shunned. Time to re-boot or perhaps retire.

  • Martin Campbell

    18-05-2009

    Where I get my news.

    If anyone cares...

    I don't read the newspapers unless I'm stuck somewhere waiting - then I try to do the puzzles. I grew up on the Globe and Mail, and will read that over most if I have an option. That media monopolies that have been allowed to flourish caused me to back away from print and broadcast news.

    I simply DO.NOT.BELIEVE. what is put out by the mass media. I can't read or view their information without questioning everything. Frankly it becomes tiresome and predictable - one sided viewpoints, half a story, skewed facts etc. Not to mention the advertising!!!

    I get my news from talking with others, doing my own research, the internet and asking questions. Same thing with the last 'election'. I read the literature, spoke to the candidates and formed my own opinion. Mind you the liberal candidates office wasn't accessible to people with disabilities so I'll never know what he had to say aside from a big FU to the disabled.

    Can anyone nominate a reporter or broadcaster that is respected, unbiased and trusted? I can't. I'd love to hear some names!

  • the bon

    18-05-2009

    Democracy is gone in BC

    The government controls the press, and it seems the courts as well(Basi/Virk - obstruction of justice??) Democracy has been highjacked and no one cares. When I saw the media put the "family man" Campbell and his wife on TV for their "Mothers Day" meal and then showed them voting like they are one big, happy family, with everyone knowing about Gord and Lara- they were showing a LIE and passing it off as truth (I personally don't care about private lives, but they RUINED Gordon Wilson & Judi Tyabji's careers and the hypocracy of the media makes me want to throw up) that is when I realized how far the media will go - they will outright lie for their objective. We are supposed to have a free press, but it is only as free as the big bosses will let it be. I belive the PAB is working in partnership with the MSM so this drivel they are printing is (I will bet) being paid with our tax dollars!! Palmer, Smyth, etal, they are only puppets, not journalists, but unfortunately they have much influence with people. I think this is sooo dangerous I cannot believe most people can't see it. Can this be considered a crime, for the media to (IMO) elect a premier??

  • Martin Campbell

    18-05-2009

    The media won't listen

    I heard this from the NDP. I asked them about their low FOI request numbers and why I never heard about them (and why their web site was so low on data and facts). I swear to god the response from the head campaign manager was a shrug and 'well what can we do if they don't publish our stories'?

    The NDP gets a massive FAIL in communications.

    And why worry so much about the media? They have almost no credibility anymore. You want them to pay attention - get the news out in other ways.

    At no time during any of the elections in the last 8 years has a candidate knocked on my door, stood outside on the street ... NOTHING! They have been invisible. That's one main reason why I've started going to them (with the exception of the Liberals due to their offices not being physically accessible). Even a priest/minister type was outside a church recently with two chairs and a card table with a sign 'the pastor is in'. Too bad our candidates aren't as personable.

    Voter apathy starts with candidate apathy.

  • lynn

    18-05-2009

    Strange logic

    dave 49,

    Rafe may have been shunned by the co-opted media but not by those who count.

    And when the final votes were counted on the coast and Vancouver Island, it was the BC Liberals who were shunned.

    I think you reached the wrong conclusion.

    My logic, quirky as it is, tells me it's the negligent mainstream media that should "re-boot or retire". And that's putting it nicely.

    We'll keep Rafe, thank you very much.

    And our wild salmon and wild rivers, too.

  • dorothy

    18-05-2009

    There's an idea!

    "Until there is a shift from tertiary information (eg. the big media) to firsthand information (eg. ordinary people out in the field), the public will be prone to misinformation and propaganda. I'm hoping the Internet will allow those firsthand stories to be told, to be read, and to be recorded when they're ignored."

    How about prevailing on those TEACHERS who so like to present themselves as progressive and all about sustainability and social righteousness, to take their disciples out into the places where it all happens, where the rubber meets the road and the shovel meets the dirt, so the next generation will not be so woefully devoid of that vital understanding?

  • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.