It Hurts, and Here's Why
Fish farms won. Private river power won. STV is dead.
Cartoon by Ingrid Rice.
The election was a big win for Gordon Campbell and the Liberals and, yes, it hurt and this column is a tad personal.
As spokesperson for Save Our Rivers Society, I travelled the entire province except the Peace River and I can't begin to count the speeches and other happenings. I obviously wasn't able to get out the message about private river energy and for that I must accept responsibility.
Last night was a terrible one for the environment. Alex Morton, who has laboured so hard to save our salmon from the predation of fish farms must be bitterly disappointed, as am I.
I want to examine the election itself but I must touch upon the rivers matter for the record.
Private power generators will increase dramatically. The Bute Inlet project, larger in environmental impact than Site "C," will be approved shortly. When that happens, there will be no turning back. The message I tried to get out and failed in was getting people to understand that BC Hydro is compelled to buy that power at hugely inflated prices that it cannot come close to getting on the market. At present, Hydro has given out contracts amounting to $31 BILLION dollars, rising with each new private power licence and, here's the rub, for energy we can't use because it comes with the spring run-off when BC Hydro has full reservoirs thus lots of power. The private power will go to the U.S. and the process, unless reversed, will spell the end of BC Hydro.
One of the critical points in the election was the Campbell government's steadfast refusal to debate this issue despite all the provocation I could provide. This is a sad commentary on the election process but was a very smart move by Campbell for our case is unanswerable. I suspect that Richard Neufeld's departure for the Senate was contrived as Premier Campbell knew his energy plan couldn't withstand even mild cross examination while the new minister knew nothing about the real issues and would be able to duck debate.
Victories for fish farm, river power giants
The big winners were Marine Harvest, the fish farm giant and Warren Buffet, the largest shareholder of General Electric, partners with Plutonic Power Corporation Inc, the promoters of the Bute Inlet project. The big losers were those who care about fish and rivers.
In addition to refusing to debate the fish and power issues, Campbell skillfully painted himself as the steady hand on the tiller needed in these perilous economic times. He was able to do so because NDP leader Carole James could not avoid dealing with the NDP's traditional issues -- social issues -- thus blunting her attack on the economic front.
Campbell knew that his natural constituency did not, at this time at any rate, give a fiddler's wind passing for the homeless, the sick and the lame. His playing the economy card over and over again while refusing to get into other issues, except in a perfunctory way, had the effect of making Ms. James look like a bleeding heart while Campbell appeared as the white knight leading the province out of the economic wilderness.
Will fudged budget melt?
It's hard to criticize James because she obviously had to let her natural constituency know she was carrying their issues onto the battlefield. The end result was that Campbell had absolute control over the issue people wanted to hear about most -- the economy.
What comes next?
We'll see a new budget, which will remind many of the "fudget budget" of the Clark government in 1996, and we'll see a legislature more fractious than ever, which won't matter at all to Mr. Campbell who has, under our system, a four-year dictatorship ahead -- and none play the role of dictator better that he. We will have civil unrest over the rivers issue and when, not if, BC Hydro is broken up and sold. The polarization of our community will match if not exceed those days when Bill Bennett and Dave Barrett spat endless streams of venom at one another.
STV is not to be
Finally, STV. What went wrong?
I can only relate to personal experiences. As a supporter of STV, I was asked to make a speech on its behalf, which I did -- it was before about 100 supporters in a room in the SFU downtown campus. Supporters! I was spending valuable time and energy for nothing!
The STV campaign was obviously taken over by the Bay Street crowd. The last thing British Columbians wanted were lectures from the likes of Andrew Coyne of the Toronto Globe and Mail.
I was asked to do an endorsement for the "yes" side and did so thinking it was for radio ads only to find out, to my horror, that I became part of a telemarketing exercise. I hate that stuff and so, my mail tells me, do a lot of people.
I feel desperately sorry for former MLA Nick Loenen who has put so many years on this project and can only speculate that if he had remained in control it might have turned out differently.
Bottom line? This issue is dead for a decade.
The election itself?
History tells us that in bad times people often turn to the right.
Yesterday was no exception.
Related Tyee stories:
- BC's Clashing Shades of Green
How 'run of river' and global warming are splitting enviros this election. - Plutonic Power CEO denies donating to Libs, then changes story
- Guide to Tyee Election Reporting
You gave. We reported. A round-up of our coverage so far.




84
Login or register to post comments
grub
2 years ago
Losers...
The most significant loss was the lack of electoral reform. BCians missed a chance to rid ourselves of a system that is inherently unfair.
OK, I wasn't convinced that STV was the answer, but surely some form of proportional rep would have been better than what we're stuck with now.
What's to blame for the STV loss? First, it was too complicated to explain; if I can't wrap my brain around it how can I vote for it? Second, I blame the entrenched party operatives who had much to lose from the greater power STV threatened to give individual candidates and 3rd and 4th party candidates, and take away from party machines.
Specifically, I'll point the finger at backroom boys like Thieleman and Schreck. Their ilk had everything to lose from STV and their campaigning reflected their self interest.
I used to respect their opinions. Sorry, they no longer reflect the views of the common man. Sorry, they sold out.
As a trade unionist and natural NDP voter (who supported the notion of a triple-E senate), I'll now turn my back on such opportunists and cast my ballot, no matter what, for the Greens.
driftwolf
2 years ago
Me, I've lost faith with the
Me, I've lost faith with the system. We elect a dictator for 4 years who gets to use the party whip for every vote. We have allowed a moneyed class to gain control of the system, and the sheep are too stupid to realize they're being fleeced at every turn. We have allowed newspapers to become propaganda arms of those who have usurped our power. My grandfather and great-grandfather fought in wars to give us freedom and choice that we have willingly given up in favour of an illusion of security and honeyed words from lying scum.
I give up. We don't live in a democracy. We live in a lie. I for one will no longer lend any seeming of legitimacy to that lie.
I will no longer be voting.
Let the kings and barons fight it out amongst themselves. Let the oligarchs drain dry the public purse while they force us serfs to pay our ever increasing taxes while giving us less and less in return.
Some day, the people will rise up again and cast off our current aristocracy. But that won't happen in this generation. The plutocrats have gotten very good at convincing the sheep that the is somehow fair. That the sheep actually have a say in how things work. That kind of propaganda is going to take many years to fight.
Now excuse me, I have to get to work so that I have enough money to pay for the massive debt that's being incurred in my name.
grub
2 years ago
driftwolf has lost faith...
driftwolf: "The plutocrats have gotten very good at convincing the sheep that the [system?] is somehow fair." TOO RIGHT!
I too have lost faith!
I'm no Green (but henceforth will vote that way), but you can't convince me that the 8-9% of the populace who voted Green don't deserve a voice at the table. Never mind the 15% (I'm just guessing) who might have voted Green had they believed the system would actually bother counting their votes.
Disgusting results!
danneau
2 years ago
What we don't know will certainly hurt us...
The really sad part is that most voters don't really know what is being done and so can't make a sane choice regardless of point of view. As it is, irreparable damage is being done to the ecosphere, the econosphere and the sociosphere as we race to oblivion. I will certainly continue to vote, but without much faith that I will ever see a slate of candidates whose views resemble the picture of fairness that I have in my head. With less than half the registered voters exercising their franchise, it seems cleat that BC is full of people who either think that everything is arranged for the best in this, the best of all possible worlds (the world according to Leonard Asper) or that voting for any of the current parties is a waste of the minimal time and resources it takes to vote. I like Barbara Ehrenreich's recent thought that all those people who no longer have the demands of a job to take up their time devote that time and whatever resources they have to promoting and enacting fundamental change in the way we do things.
morechatter
2 years ago
A Nail In the Coffin
It hurts you got that right and its going to be hurting a whole lot more as immigration continues to climb at accelerated efforts while the jobless migrate into the city. Well we can get the cry on for sure because jobs, jobs, jobs as in January unprecedented numbers of immigrants come in while record numbers lose there jobs. And interest rates also unprecedented.
Apparently they are trying to get another bubble on but only this time no jobs but they will create that to as it will not be the first time.
http://www.cicnews.com/2009/04/canada-maintain-immigration-levels-2009-requirements-change-04710.html
http://www.immigrationwatchcanada.org/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=4304
Strong the stench around this province is so strong it makes you wanna puke, oh thats what happened to lunch yesterday, because I just couldn't keep them down. And I feel so bad for it but maybe next time.
seth
2 years ago
Private Power hell
Gordo over the next couple of years will be doubling our power rates as a result of 100 billion (my guess) or so in IPP purchases at 12 cents a kwh when the spot price remains in the 2 cent a kwh range and everybody else is buying Nukes and southwest desert solar again in the 2 cent range.
The $50 billion in already committed probable IPP loses was never investigated or reported on by somebody with the cred's of Will McMartin or Vaughn Palmer or even the NDP itself.
Rafe you need to check out
http://publicpowerissues.blogspot.com/
To see why the 31 billion is optimistic based on "firm" and not total power purchase commitments.
Will McMartin had a excellent article utterly destroying the NDP's bad ten years myth.
The NDP should have been shouting back McMartin's stats and the IPP losses every time the Libs brought up their economic creds and the NDP record yet Jerry Scott refused to go there. Gordo has no business experience whatsoever yet the NDP let him get away with that. When he did work for a developer 30 years ago he was their political guy and had nothing to do with the core of the business.
Idiots managed that campaign.
That said Canadians vote on image and Carol James has a oh so nice mom type image that will lose every election every time. Carol Taylor, or Larry Campbell had they been NDP leaders would have wiped the floor with the Gordo.
Finally Liberals 41 NDP 44 That would have been the result if the so called "Greens" had confined themselves to supporting STV and stayed out of this election.
In 8 ridings that the Gordo and his gang won the NDP + green vote was greater than the Liberal.
The first task in rebuilding the left is to eradicate the NOT "Green" party from the Canadian electoral scene, leaving it piled on the dung heap of Canadian politics and left to rot in its own irresponsible puerile rhetoric.
cocean
2 years ago
driftwolf
You're the third person I've heard since last night say they weren't going to vote anymore. Add me to the numbers too.
In a letter to a local paper, I predicted this would happen. I also just submitted an abstract I'd been putting off, for the November conference in Vancouver of the Public Health Association of BC.
My title? "Digging Down Deep: Inclusion and the democratic process."
morechatter
2 years ago
"Well, my gosh, it may never happen."
http://updates.canadafirst.net/2009/02/canadian-immigration-hotline-january.html
“Everybody really knew that the U.S. real estate market was overbuilt, that it was a bubble. A lot of us raised the issue that this idea that you can compensate for declining income by raising your house prices and you can continue to incur debt — we knew that (system) was going to blow ... but some people said ‘It’s going to happen next year’ and then ‘Well, my gosh, it may never happen.’”
Well it did happen and developers are getting set to try to do it again only the economy is even worst. How many Canadians can sleep on a sidewalk, and how long before they are part of Canadian history?
Martin: somebody has got to point out that this thing blew and the most knowledgeable people in the world — not just bankers but (leaders of) industries, didn’t have a clue that it was going to happen.”
David Lewis
2 years ago
Get a grip Rafe
I read Corky Evan's pamphlet on why we need a moratorium on private power development in BC and laughed. Fortis delivers private power to his own home, yet Corky claimed allowing private operators to develop hydroelectric power was a new thing we needed to think over. The generating facilities serving the West Kootenays have been in private hands for 100 years.
We're selling the water Corky claimed, but if you have ever looked at a contract, the province leases the right to generate to you, and you pay for the right off the top, before expenses and any calculation of profit. Then you pay the province again, taxes on income if you make any.
It isn't green power says Corky, who are we kidding here? Run of the river power isn't green? What kind of gibberish is this? Compared to what?
I have noticed you aren't incorporating what is known about climate into your thinking Rafe. The Liberal win was "terrible" for "the environment" as if the fundamental underpinning of river ecology is not the climate.
Many are saying this is the historic moment for climate, that this will be seen to have been the decisive moment for civilization: are we going to start turning away from energy that emits greenhouse gases, or are we going to hand down to our descendants a problem we have let grow so large they won't be able to fix it.
No matter what else they've done, the Liberals have enacted the most aggressive policy to date on climate yet seen in North America, and your dear Carole James was doing her best to torpedo the effort. What happens to politicians who try to implement carbon taxes is watched carefully, worldwide, and the Liberals have pulled it off, they've put one in, suffered the worst kind of insincere posturing from the NDP as they attacked looking to pick up rural votes, and survived.
You should think about where that water you're so concerned about in the rivers comes from. Its the atmosphere. Any ecosystem is an expression of the climate, and if the climate changes, so does the ecosystem, including your rivers. The entire climate system of Earth is about to be shuffled up and it won't be going from point A to point B, some new climate. We are about to enter a period of constant change in climate, with consequences spelled out by the Toronto Changing Atmosphere conference more than twenty years ago as consequences that "could only be exceeded by global nuclear war", it is hitting the fan now, and what you've got to say is the terrible thing is that a government was elected in BC that chose as one of its platform planks that we should face this issue and do something about it.
Isabella2
2 years ago
Self-flagellation not deserved
Rafe: You and I agreed that, if we failed in our goals, we would always blame ourselves for not having done enough. Wrongo, My Friend. There is no way, under Queensbury rules, that 'nice', or 'logic', or 'ethics and accountability' can ever win out in BC politics. Not over people who, on the one hand would scream bloody murder about an NDP candidate under investigation, but on the other have no trouble casting a 2,500 majority for a candidate who is under RCMP investigation.
What we can do one day - with Alex perhaps - is cry out our sorrows over a 'cuppa' for a province lost.
As for STV? You and I have nothing to be ashamed of. Much to my surprise and chagrin, the responsibility for our loss of the only fallback position to a Liberal win, falls squarely on the shoulders of Messrs. Schreck and Tieleman and those of like mind.
morechatter
2 years ago
The environment
You had to go mention that as its a tear jerker for sure as de-regulation is no longer a requirement but a law to doing business in this province. Its also wonderful of course just like everything else in the land of milk and honey and something tells me there is going to be a whole lot of crying going on and its got Liberal attached to it. But then Liberal voters asked for it so what can they say, nothing. We like the abuse? Kinda like a being in a bad relationship where the old man is a boozer and he beats the crap out of you, and your loyal anyways. Fear + ignorance = liberal voter.
David Lewis
2 years ago
STV was past its "best before" date
In 2005, fresh memories existed from the two immediately previous elections that called the present electoral system into question. There was the 1996 39.45% of the vote "majority" Clark government that took over the province even though the Liberals got 41.8%. And there was the 2001 57.6% Liberal vote that translated into 77 of 79 MLAs with almost no representation for the 40% or so of the voters who didn't vote Liberal. So there were people from all parts of the spectrum almost freshly cheesed off at FPTP. If it weren't for the inexplicable opposition of the Green Party leadership in 2005, STV would have been the system last night.
Its all water under the bridge now. People started to think about what STV would cause, not what it would fix. Memories of the 1996 problem for the right, and the 2001 problem for the left and the Greens have faded.
You may think you can sell refrigerators to the Inuit a la Ralph Williams, Rafe, given the right campaign manager, but think about this: the right started to wonder if an NDP/Green alliance might keep them from ever gaining power again, and the dreamers in the NDP who want to run a majority government again no matter how long they have to wait can see, that under STV, they'll never have a majority government again, they'll always be in a coalition with someone, as they've never achieved the 50% popular vote an STV system would require at minimum for them to rule.
I loved the STV system when I first studied it, until I saw the Green leadership reject it in 2005 and thereby shoot themselves in the head. I thought, what would these clowns do if they had the balance of power in BC as STV would hand to them? They'd cause chaos. They couldn't even understand that STV was in their interest beyond any other party for four years.
Skywalker
2 years ago
Right on Rafe!
Anyone who thinks that Campbell's new mandate will be a turning point in the fight against climate change is delusional. Years from now we will be looking at this time as the last time we had the opportunity to save BC for our kids and Campbell will be known as piker who sold off their futures for a few more years to play god.
As for the NDP, they have to stop listening to the media clowns in the hopes they will become acceptable to the corporate sector.
Frank
2 years ago
Skywalker
"As for the NDP, they have to stop listening to the media clowns in the hopes they will become acceptable to the corporate sector."
That I believe is the problem at party HQ.
grub
2 years ago
dreamers in the NDP
Nicely put, DavidLewis: "the dreamers in the NDP who want to run a majority government again no matter how long they have to wait...."
Hello! That's you Schreck! That's you Thieleman!
Instead of potential STV NDP-Green coalitions we get Liberals for a very long time.
Thanks, you losers!
Frank
2 years ago
grub
You should go over to Bill's site at
http://billtieleman.blogspot.com/
and tell him that.
By the way, nice seeing you post again, been a long time.
mcdull
2 years ago
BC
We have seen the end of the soft caring BC. Now comes the wild ride to the bottom where everything is privatized. It is the end of BC. Corporate BC won the citizens lost. Time to start the death knell and start the Vancouver Island First Party. As all we will have left for our grandchildren will be farmed salmon and acres of development with no idea of what nature is like.
wondering
2 years ago
What next?
Yes, I too am very disappointed and deeply saddened to see that Campbell has gotten in again and that our STV chance was thrown out. I too, am gravely concerned about the environmental implications of the majority vote for the neo-liberals -- to me it feels like "the best place on earth' has just been put on the global sacrificial block by a collective of economy terrified people who have been led to believe that giving away our resources is our only way out. The more pressing question now is what do we do?? Not voting ever again is like cutting your nose off to spite your face --extremely ignorant. Maybe its time to resort to general strikes, consumer boycotts, and litigation. Sitting on our self-pitying asses and sucking our thumbs cuz we just got whipped, is not going to improve anything. Time to put on the wondering caps, quick.
grub
2 years ago
Frank...
Bill (http://billtieleman.blogspot.com/)is apparently no longer accepting comments. Instead, he says "My commitment to ensuring this is a free speech blog is being tested by sore losers".. Move on, he says.
Frank
2 years ago
mcdull
"Time to start the death knell and start the Vancouver Island First Party."
I like that idea, VI is almost always NDP whereas the mainland is always Socred-Liberal. I'd move to VI in no time if it was a separate province. But I think that new province should include the coast from Jervis Inlet to Prince Rupert too.
Crass
2 years ago
Rafe: No need to blame
Rafe: No need to blame yourself. It is not a moral failing on your part. It has more to do with being subject to the current economic and political system we live under that produced the results last night. Blaming yourself is playing into the ideological hands of the powers that be: that our personal, social and economic destiny is a direct result of individual characteristics, and has nothing to do with the current economic and political system we operate in. They have already taken over our rivers and economic and political apparatus. Let them not take over our minds too!
Progressives can look inward all they want to see what went wrong during this campaign: split of the progressive vote, ineffective Carole James, "axe the gas tax" policy, global recession, mass media concentration, and on and on.
All of these issues deserve some attention, but I think it would be wise to step back and take an even wider view of things. Why is it that progressive ideas gain traction and get worked into legislation in many Western European and South American countries? Why is it that, of all industrialized countries, it is only in Anglo-Saxon dominated countries like the U.K., U.S., and Canada (perhaps Australia too)progressive ideas rarely get worked into legislation?
As a result, we continually elect an unbalanced legislature on the provincial and federal level. This imbalance feeds on itself and creates more of an economic and power imbalance reflected in legislation.
Crass
2 years ago
We seem to be stuck in a
We seem to be stuck in a political paradox: the more people get turned off from politics and politicians and don't vote, the more influence 'BIG MONEY' from corporations and the wealthy elite have in controlling our political apparatus. This in turn alienates the average voter even more, turning off even more people from voting, resulting in even more and more influence from people and interests groups that benefit from the status quo. Where will it end?
I believe our 'democracy' is heading for a crisis (if we are not already in one now)due to increasing imbalance in who influences policy in government.
Will we just drift into a dictatorship, like a frog drifts into unconsciousness and ultimately death when the water it is submerged into goes from warm to boiling hot?
Like many commentators here, a part of me is completely cynical and jaded about the political system we live under. A part of me says "This is the last time I will ever vote", or "I'm never voting NDP again in my life." However, I'm astute enough to know that that is exactly what the powers that be WANT. APATHY!
Perhaps the NDP and Green Party should both be dissolved and the best aspects of there policy platforms combined to form a new Progressive Party in BC.
What green voters must realize is that economic equality, I believe, is a PREREQUISITE to a sustainable future. Only when decisions on the stewardship of the ecology is in the hands of the people (democratic control), will we ever be able to act in the interests of an ecologically sustainable future.
For the record, I voted NDP and for the STV.
biscotti
2 years ago
civil unrest
...is certainly what is needed to stop the privatization of BC Hydro and more run of river projects. Hopefully, channeled into creative forms of direct action. Something the Scotts, Tielmans and Schrecks can't control.
Crash II
2 years ago
maybe treating us as stupid wasn't a good idea afterall
I'm going to go out on a limb here & suggest that one possible reason why there wasn't much traction with the anti-IPP / anti-renewable energy approach was that certain, uh, spokespeople treated the audience like morons. It's amazing how screaming one-liners instead of honestly addressing the issue somehow alienated folks with operable levels of critical thinking skills.
If I hear "they're selling our rivers" or "they're exporting our power to the US" or "BC Hydro owes a gabillion dollars" one more time I'm going to jump out of my window.
I hate being maliciously mislead, and the attitude of "we're treating them like morons for their own good" just doesn't cut it from any part of the political spectrum. And yes, I'm a lifelong NDP supporter... who almost voted elsewhere this time. I'm also a life-long environmentalist who does more for the world by breakfast than most, yet I'm embarrassed by the utterly banal manner in which ecological threats are being mis-portrayed these days. No wonder people are cynical.
frances
2 years ago
1917?
You did good, Rafe. You're not responsible for human nature. My father used to embarass me by shouting how people were sheep, then I realized he was right. Most people's first priority is getting that new flat screen TV and if the environment or some goofy moral issue stands in the way, screw it.
What's the solution? Forget the sheep. Herd them into pens & give em their fodder. Then take some direct action and lots of it.
seth
2 years ago
lewis again
Are you are Luke Skywalker in his latest disguise? Lost the Manitoba thing?
Pirate power costs double public power for the same project because BCHydro can borrow at much lower rates. Site C would be less than half far cheaper than Bute to the public on an annual basis. Site C power stored behind a dam would be much more valuable than Bute. If it decided to, BCHydro could build Bute for half the annual cost that Hydro is paying Plutonic.
Spot power is selling now at 2 cents a kwh and will remain so in the long term with new nuclear solar tech. So BcHydro could buy "green" power for 15% of what it pays Plutonic. In fact since 60% of annual pirate power flows in the spring when BCHydro's dams are full and it is already exporting BCHydro will have to sell pirate output on the spot market at an 85% loss.
Check out the facts at
http://publicpowerissues.blogspot.com/
reallife
2 years ago
McDull - are you sure?
"I'd move to VI in no time if it was a separate province"
What would you do for power? VI gets its electricity from dams on the mainland that is routed through Tsawwassen (and doesn't that make folks happy!). VI people are against run of the river, windpower and gas fired power plants.
What would you do for heat? VI gets its natural gas from the northeast, via a subsidized gas line from the mainland to the island. VI people are against development of coalbed gas.
What would you do for money? VI relies on government for employment (paid for by the rest of the province).
Who would subsidize your transportation? VI people do not want to pay the cost of ferries.
LeftRightLeft
2 years ago
NO STV CAMPAIGN ANALYSIS
Someone at the Tyee or another independent media outlet should do a proper analysis of the No-STV Campaign and Tieleman's involvement. Now he's blathering on about the need for mandatory voting.
Let me get this straight - so we reject measures to improve the perceived value of individual votes and enhance legislative negotiation, then we force everyone to participate in a process they consider to be blatantly useless. Great way to increase civic engagement!
And people on the left still consider this guy one of their spokespersons?!?!
Frank
2 years ago
realife
"What would you do for power?
What would you do for heat?
..."
Are you saying Van Island would be kicked out of Confederation and no trade would be allowed due to some sort of pan-North American embargo?
Frank
2 years ago
LeftRightLeft
"And people on the left still consider this guy one of their spokespersons?!?!"
Some of us stopped doing that when he came out against the federal Libs and NDP forming a Coalition gov't. He agreed with the arguments of the Reform Party.
Others are slowly coming around to this view too I think.
VivianLea Doubt
2 years ago
What Frank said...
and more of what wondering said.
It hurts, it hurts really bad, and we gotta get to work...
OilbertaRedTory
2 years ago
85 Members of the BC Legislative Assembly ...
... according to the wisdom of the BC electorate :
Conservative - 0 [ ~ 2% counted voters]
Green - 3 seats [ ~ 8% counted voters]
New Dem -19 seats [ ~ 42% counted voters]
Liberals - 21 seats [ ~ 46% counted voters]
Empty seats - 42 [ ~ 50% / absent ]
Democracy is a verb, not an adjective.
Canada has stopped democratising.
What a pity.
grub
2 years ago
On Tieleman...
"And people on the left still consider this guy one of their spokespersons?!?!"
He lost me when it became obvious (I'm a slow learner) that he was a proponent of the status quo and the "I'm a backroom operative and know what's good for the party, and the rest of the populace are just dumb sheep to herded when the cause needs them to be herded..." way of thinking.
No more buddy! This sheep ain't being herded no more.
grub
2 years ago
ditto Frank
"Some of us stopped doing that when he came out against the federal Libs and NDP forming a Coalition gov't."
Once more some NDP party hack (Bill T)living in a delusional state thinking that the party might, on its own, form a government - minority, much less majority. The NDP needs a coalition. Right now it needs to work with the Greens. That means, it needs to find some way to get Greens to the table.
Instead of bleating about how Greens should have voted NDP strategically, I don't recall any NDP candidates volunteering to abstain and turn all their support over to excellent Green candidates.
Coalitions cut both ways, guys.
verso
2 years ago
...
"Someone at the Tyee or another independent media outlet should do a proper analysis of the No-STV Campaign and Tieleman's involvement."
Why? I didn't vote with Teilman's on STV and I don't always agree with his political analysis but from what I can tell Tielman ran a fair and above the board campaign. It wasn't a secret that he was in charge of the No side, so just what are you accusing him of?
I've also heard the Yes side raised 200,000 additional dollars to campaign with while the no side raised only 20,000. The only lawn signs and buttons I saw were for the Yes side.
Do you believe there would've been a different outcome if someone other than Bill was running the No side?
Maybe the analysis should be why was STV rejected, not once, but twice by the electorate.
verso
2 years ago
for the record...
I voted no the previous election and yes in this one.
cghzd
2 years ago
Nice people don't win! They
Nice people don't win! They end up with tire tread marks all over their forehead as in Carol James case.
Campbell knew he could run all over her long before the election started.
The NDP should have gone outside BC for someone to run their Campaign strategy.
A guy like James Carville, who ran Bill Clinton's campaign, knows what down and dirty is all about might have engineered the screwing over of Gordo and the rest of the bums so richly deserved.
Not to worry though, Gordo and a few of his ex thugs might end in up in jail before his term is out.
Half the people in BC are functionally illiterate the other half don't give a fiddlers F@#$%% about politics ( it takes too much brain power and they might have to form an opinion about something)as witnessed in a less than 50% turn out.
Stop crying in your beer these bastards will get their own soon.
Clawman
2 years ago
glooming
Enough with the morbid post-election despair, loss of faith, handwringing, and generalized apocalypticism! Where was all this energy and bluster when it was needed, out on the campaign trail where our futures are being decided? Its Civics 101--we are the government, we decide. Not the BIg Media, Big Business, Big Backroom but the Big Us, and half of us stayed home rather than vote, out of some misbegotten sense of powerlessness. You have as much power as you want to grasp, but if you don't reach out, you can't complain if you end up empty-handed.
Blue Camas
2 years ago
A simpler STV?
Why do we have to vote for MP's? Why not just vote for a Party?
Parties would then be assigned a number of Members of Parliament based on their percentage of the vote.
Those seats would be filled from ranked, public, MP Candidate Lists maintained by each Party.
Individual Ridings could still be represented in many ways. One way would be for Ridings to be assigned an MP by the Party with the majority in that Riding. When sufficient MPs are not available for this, the Riding's winning Party would assign a (non-voting) Representative who would represent that Riding within the Party caucus.
circle A
2 years ago
campbells got what it takes...
to take what you`ve got! and he has very rich and powerful friends,some of them buy ink in 500 gallon containers and all of it is used to print nice things about him.add to that the canwest global and corus support board of trade ,fraser institute and on and on.we can now look forward to getting our noses rubbed in it.I have a lot more appreciation for carol james now that i can see how decent she really is and campbell just comes off as the lying sleaseball he always was.
Wilfred Laurier
2 years ago
Rafe....
"I travelled the entire province except the Peace River and I can't begin to count the speeches and other happenings. "
Don't you realise you were preaching to the choir, Rafe?
A man of your achievements should retire gracefully.
Alexandra Morton
2 years ago
wild salmon
If BC wants wild salmon, which I highly doubt at this point, they had better do something about it themselves, because they should not expect people to keep fighting this battle if they are going to elect Campbell over and over.
When asked to apply the laws of Canada to fish farms he locked the doors to Canada Place so a petition signed by 14,000 people would not clutter his desk, and BC said yup, that's the guy for us.
I really can't help you.
Gidget
2 years ago
Rafe is totally off base!
Although I respect Rafe for his service to the people of BC from 1975-81, and his service as a radio promoter, I think that he is way off base now.
How can anyone, who vehemently opposed the NDP, turn around and betray his political past by crawling into bed with the enemy.
It's Rafe's type that disillusioned people hate the most. Rafe is nothing more and nothing less than an Ujjal Dosanjh style turncoat. He has about as much political credibility as Brian Mulroney.
How dare Rafe become a traitor to free enterprise. I can not stand anyone who wants to fight freedom, capitalism, and democracy. Rafe's attacks on fish farms, independent power producers, the First Past the Post System, Gordon Campbell makes me doubt his health and well being.
Rafe has had a distinguished career. He should step aside and let someone with better credibility handle the difficult issues that someone of his age can not possibly handle.
Like Gordon Gibson and Allan Fotheringham, Rafe's time has passed.
I would like to thank him for his past service to the people of BC, and would strongly urge him to step aside and let his former free enterprise colleagues carry on with governing this province as we see fit.
Socialism is dead. It always has been, and always will be.
Why did Rafe run against them in 1975 and 1979? Was he a closet Commie all this time?
When he vehemently opposed the Charlottetown Accord in 1992, was he really trying to undermine the government with a socialist revolution? Why was he so opposed to his betters?
When he endorsed the BC-STV campaign, what were his real motives?
The mind baffles!
I wish Rafe all the best in retirement. He truly deserves it.
He should let us in the free enterprise coalition do anything that we want. He didn't stop us when he was a Socred cabinet minster back from 1975-81. Why should he do so now?
Dr Alexander
2 years ago
Enough Griping and Carping
Gordon Campbell can only do what we allow him to do. It is not a four year dictatorship if we are actively involved.
Is your MLA a Liberal? Then make it perfectly clear that, if policies contrary to the public good of BC are being enacted, you will spend your time making sure you will fight tooth, nail and pocketbook to get that MLA out if they do not serve your interests. Party whip be damned. If enough MLAs knock on Gordo's door, policies will be changed. Especially if there is a threat of a "REAL" investigation to BC Rail.
Go to a store to buy stuff? Ask the proprietor if they support the BC Liberals. If so, tell them you will take your business elsewhere.
Join the associations (tax deductible charities) that seek to sell out BC and make your voice heard. Join the Suzuki Foundation and yell and scream as to why they "rolled" on private power to the detriment of BCers and the salmon.
C'mon folks. Get off your @ss and stop singing to the choir. We have heard it all before. Start griping and carping to the people that support Gordo and tell them you will not do business with them.
In a few years time, Gordo is going to be as well liked as Glen C. was near the end.
mcdull
2 years ago
Gidget
You call Rafe a turncoat but so was our Mayor who was NDP till 4 months ago and then ran for the liberals. This after he didn't fight the closuure of our hospital and operating rooms. They were among the busiest in BC. The hospital was built by the people of this town with their own money.Closed no more emergency, just a joke of urgent care. The equipment the town paid for gone , shipped to Nanaimo and Duncan. When Graham Bruce was our MLA he snuck into town so quietly no one knew he was here. As a socred he didn't represent the people as a teflon liberal he was tainted so bad he lost. He never said a word and ignored the riding and lost.
aalborg
2 years ago
fish farms
Knowledge Network ran an excellent documentary tonight about Alexandra Morton and her efforts to stop fish farms. The fact that these operations are so blatantly wrong and we can do nothing about them is beyond the pale. This all ties in with the election yesterday of a group of people who do not give a damn for this province and it's people.
I sat and watched some of the Mulroney inquiry and it occurred to me I then had to leave the house and go and vote for another lying, cheating individual and had to choose the lesser of the evils on the ballot.
We have to up the revolution and get out there and let it be known that we will make the decisions that affect BC. Those elected officials have got to realize we want and are demanding a democratic society and they are going to deliver it. A lot of noise has to be made and hopefully it will motivate the large numbers who chose not to vote either due to their lack of understanding of politics or their just plain dumb and dumber brains and attitudes.
MJK
2 years ago
Schmucks
Election Swine Fever
Wearing a thrift store Weyerhauser jacket
In solidarity with my union brethren
the schmucks!
working 37 years, buying toys
RVs, ATVs, holidays and such
packing it in, for a pension
to do more spending and consumption
Wearing my Yves St Laurent suit
In solidarity with my corporate brethren
the schmucks!
37 years of cover-up
in 100 per cent virgin wool
and fine dining in the Azores
packing it in, for retirement at 50
more spending and high-value consumption
Wearing jeans, a Cowichan hat and cotton flannel shirt
In solidarity with my green brethren
the schmucks! And saps!
eco-friendliness for decades
of whole-earthiness, while having kids
and making amends buying committed toilet paper
packing it in, for a week at Hollyhock
spent consumption
If pigs could fly, and politicians weep
And workers of the world united
In something less than greed
Or green greed, with a Cheshire grin
We’re quaking in our boots
(as ice shelves collapse)
by watching Canucks on ice
one flu over our cuckoo’s nest
driftwolf
2 years ago
Dr Alexander writes: "Gordon
Dr Alexander writes: "Gordon Campbell can only do what we allow him to do. It is not a four year dictatorship if we are actively involved."
You REALLY don't understand our current system of parliamentary democracy do you? "party whip be damned"?? In your wildest dreams maybe, but in the real world every single MLA who dares vote against his own party will immediately be removed from that party - and therefore lose a very lucrative position. TALK to the MLA? You assume they give a rats ass. All the MLA is there for is to make sure that the same message gets out.
With their control of the newspapers in this province (or rather, with the big-business newspapers being on the side of the most neo-con possible, that being the Liberals in this province), they don't ASK for public opinion, they CREATE it.
Quite effectively too, it seems.
Historically, the only way out of this kind of situation was a revolution. But in this case the sheep are mostly well fed, and well fed sheep rarely change the status quo, even if they're getting regularly fleeced.
Jeffrey J.
2 years ago
Social Justice Always Possible
While I too am saddened to see Campbell 'won' after receiving 46% of the vote (less than 50% of the electorate voted, so he is ruling with less then 23% actual support), that by no means relieves us from our ethical responsibilities. Yes, North America's system of rule is highly undemocratic and favours the elites and rich.
But we're certainly not worse than Palestine, Afganistan, Haiti and South American regimes. But guess what? People in those countries still speak out, still seek justice, still push for social change. In BC, we have VAST opportunities to effect change.
Venues like the Tyee, freedom to organize, freedom to congregate, freedom to peacefully demonstrate, freedom to boycott, freedom to apply citizen pressure. In most regimes, people are arrested and killed for these activities. Here, we can still do them. And so we should keep using our democratic freedoms. Or risk losing them. Nobody ever said democratic progress was easy. The history of the 1930's is proof of what it took to improve peoples rights. Surely we can do the same again.
Dr Alexander
2 years ago
driftwolf....I have been around long enough
to agree to what you are saying.
I AM talking about a revolution. The government can only act if we allow them to act. They can only create public opinion if we let them create it.
What I am saying is that people should start getting a friggin BACKBONE.
Write one letter every week to Gordo and your MLA. One a week , every week.
Buy only wild salmon and tell the store that you will never buy farmed
Go to you lumber store and buy only BC sourced wood products
Find out who (in terms of business) is supporting your local MLA and, if your MLA is working for YOU, tell those enterprises that they will get your business and why. If the MLA is working against you, then tell those supporting businesses that they will not get your business and why.
Tell any of those so-called Eco foundations and the like that they can take a flying f* when it comes to your donation. You will give you donation to those that are truly working in your interest.
So, take a page from Rafe's book. Even if you are preaching to the choir, get off your a**. And cut Rafe some slack. He was part of the system and now he is fighting the system.
Business as usual is not working for the people (and ultimately businesses) of BC. And, thinking that it indeed is "a four year dictatorship and the the party whip commands all" is part of business as usual.
Just wait a year or two. Economic conditions will be such that the pitchfork-peasants will be at the gate, so to speak, and the party-whip, for example will have diddly-squat to say.
This is YOUR province. Start ACTING like an owner.
Dr Alexander
2 years ago
Jeffrey J.
You said what I wanted to say in much better way than I just did.
Well put J.
Skywalker
2 years ago
Right on Dr. Alexander
It bears repeating
"Find out who (in terms of business) is supporting your local MLA and, if your MLA is working for YOU, tell those enterprises that they will get your business and why. If the MLA is working against you, then tell those supporting businesses that they will not get your business and why.
Most of these folks think they are immune from any political backlash when they support a government that that screws the very very people they need to buy their goods and services. These are the same folks who argue against an increase in the minimum wage a moronic self-inflicted shot at their own profit margins.
DPL
2 years ago
For those who say they won't
For those who say they won't vote again try to figure it out. Don't vote, don't bitch.
The Greens are highly overrated. Their leader ended up in third place in our new riding. Her arguments were pretty shalow in lost of our minds. Maybe they need to sort out their priorities as well.
The STV failed. We can blame Shreck and Tielman but why not blame Andrew Petter who was senior to both the names mentioned, when in the NDP governments and guess what Andrew was supporting the Yes side of things.
Yes it hurst to see our province thundering down the same road Saint Gordo put us on when folks decided to punish Glenn Clark , even when he was no longer Premier. People really need a short course in election gimmics beofre entering the booth to mark their x. as many never bothered to show us as did show up.
Rafe and I are getting older and sort of like to think we will leave this place in better shape. But with Gordo at the wheel, watch out. That's the realy sad part.
I lie down to lick my wounds but will rise up again to fight on. I didn't write that but whomever did knew how it feels to lose.
Frank
2 years ago
DPL
The low voter turnout isn't a big surprise, its been falling almost everywhere over the last couple of decades as the older generations pass on.
A lot of people don't care for a two-party adversarial system, they simply tune it out. This isn't news, we all know that already.
Tielmann and Shreck on the other hand love it regardless of the effect its been having and don't want any change. They oppose STV and MMP and any other possible change. Bill T even opposed the NDP entering into a coalition but I guess that's beside the point. They want all or nothing.
Its all well and good for us to complain about the problems of the political system such as party discipline, the adversarial system, the corruption etc but until the system itself is changed none of that will ever get fixed. STV may not be perfect but it would have been here for only 12 years and would have given us a chance to test it out and see what we liked and didn't like. That chance is lost.
Bill T didn't single-handedly destroy democracy in BC, he's just an impediment to reversing the decline of it.
Janie Jones
2 years ago
1917?
"Herd them into pens & give em their fodder."
You're not naive enough to still believe that the Bolshevik takeover of the Russian Empire was all about the poor little Russian proletariat are you? Or deluded enough to suggest that a Matvei Berman style GULAG concentration camp system into which tens of millions of innocent and unremembered Russians disappeared is the solution?
The carbon tax, which has proven to not decrease GHGs by one iota, is, like the spotted owl was, a red herring. It was very unwise of the NDP to use it as a campaign issue unless they were doing so to highlight its only function - to make the Liberals seem as it they were actually concerned for the environment and not just a gang of greedy political opportunists intent on using Indian bands to privatize BC's lands and resources to the same multinational giants into whose ownership the world is being increasingly concentrated.
There's no going back now.
PatrickMcEvoyHalston
2 years ago
Thanks for the poem, MJK.
Thanks for the poem, MJK.
Wilfred Laurier
2 years ago
Hacks
Tielmann and Gerry Scott and the worst kind NDP hacks that anyone can imagine. Add David Shreck into the mix and it is not hard to see why the NDP loses elections. All three are poster children for negativity with no alternative vision. Toss them, they deserve it and the NDP deserves it, too.
"Bill T didn't single-handedly destroy democracy in BC, he's just an impediment to reversing the decline of it."
Bill T is a master of self promotion. He uses his 24 column to shill for the NDP and then gets himself appointed as NDP campaign manager in Point Grey. This is not a volunteer position. He got PAID for it, and I am sure very handsomely. He got very handsomely paid by Glen Clark as his media coordinator and succeed in getting Glen turfed out of his own party and practically wiping his own party out.
Believe me, there are more hangers on and hacks in politics than anyone really realises. Just because they are NDP hangers on and hacks doesn't make thir failure more tolerable. It's time for a housecleaning at the NDP and Schreck and Tieleman should be the first on the list.
EastVanRon
2 years ago
Voters' Futility Syndrome, and Thanks Alexandra Morton!
I'm in the same boat as several commenters here... I am seriously questioning whether to bother with voting again.
In a riding that is not a tight one, a person's vote is entirely useless. STV tried to address that with a form of proportionality, BC rejected it, and a pox on all of 'em.
Also, to Alexandra Morton: I thank you so much for what you've done (tried to do?) for the province and its inhabitants (people and fish).
I'm also deeply sorry that BC has officially jumped the rails and salmon extinction is now nearly assured.
Shame on BC...
VivianLea Doubt
2 years ago
We are all in the gutter,
There are some amzing posts here, but MJK takes my vote. Thanks for the poem - it is always good to hear between the lines.
Rafe, it's easy to see you've never really understood dippers, 'cause the NDP is on the losing side the majority of the time. Cheer up man! we have lived to fight another day.
Conceivably though, it's this very concept of 'fighting' that needs to be done away with. We are a collection of people with vasrly disparate views who face the biggest challenge of our lifetimes - global warming, the poverty of children, the homelessness on our streets, even the lack of poetry in our legislature - we must get energized and invigorated. Fighting is the essence of fiddling while Rome burns.
I suspect I could go on and on about the rally to the common cause - but we all know that people resonate to the genuine, the heartfelt, that which calls to a greater purpose. Poetry plays a part in that - eloquence even - but maybe also some thoughtful prose, of which there are examples here.
The province (the world) will be changed by the way we interact, not by the way we segregate ourselves.
to finish Oscar Wilde's line above...
but some of us are looking at the stars.
North of Hope
2 years ago
Political hacks, etc.
Wilfred Laurier says, "there are more hangers on and hacks in politics than anyone really realises."
And the BC Liberals have more than all the other parties combined. And the pay for them as well . But the BC Liberals also have the Public Affairs Branch of the Legislature working for them and the taxpayers of BC pay for them. Quite your whinning, your just being a sore winner.
Wilfred Laurier
2 years ago
True
"And the BC Liberals have more than all the other parties combined"
Perhaps this is true but they hangers on the Liberals have win them elections, not lose them.
Mel Lehman was a "sure thing" according to his self promoting campaign manager and lost by 2600 votes.
North of Hope
2 years ago
Standing Up to Gordo
Please remember when Gordo et al. were attacking the public sector unions, the BCTF finally said enough and stood up to them. They went on strike and they were supported by other public sector unions and the public in general. Gordo and his gang backed down and contracts were negotiated.
We can stand up to these thugs and stop them if we become united.
Jeffrey J. and Dr Alexander can help in this cause and maybe save the province.
North of Hope
2 years ago
Spare us from the Gullible Voter
Some of you may have seen this before but I think it's now apropos.
In the '60s we had already benefited for many years in this wonderful province. There was a story going around then which I will attempt to bring up to date or even a few years into the future - let's say 2015: (by this time "global Warming" has produced some dastardly cold winters in B.C.)
Hunter: "This time last year I shot a moose and it almost killed me."
Wannabe hunter: "The Moose?"
H: "No, the weather. It was up on the Chilcotin Plateau and while I gutted and cleaned the carcass a blizzard blew in and the temperature dropped like a stone. Couldn't see your hand in front of your face even if it was getting frostbite. Two miles to the pickup and the ATV wouldn't start.”
W: "So what did ya do?"
H: "The moose was laying there and still warm so I opened up the rib cage and crawled inside. Actually fell asleep for a few hours. When I woke up the blizzard was over but the moose was frozen solid. There was no way I could force the ribcage enough to get out."
W: "Then how did you get out?"
H: "I did some thinkin' and when I got to the memory of voting for the Campbell Liberals in 2009 I felt so small I crawled out the hole under the tail."
Tieleman
2 years ago
Bill Tieleman responds
The very first comment in this thread from "grub" - which I have just now seen - suggests that David Schreck and I from NO STV had "everything to lose" if STV were implemented.
That's laughable. David is retired and my communications and strategy business would not be affected in the least - except that it might double or triple if I got into the backroom wheeling and dealing that is standard practice in Ireland under STV.
STV proponents have to acknowledge the problems in Ireland and Malta instead of complain every time they are brought up - the fact is that in Ireland politicians cut deals within their parties and with other politicians in other parties to gain electoral support.
Party discipline in Ireland is ironclad - even abstain on a vote as a member of the Dail and you are thrown out of your party!
"Grub" also suggests that I am rejecting pro-STV comments on my blog - http://billtieleman.blogspot.com/
- absolutely not true as anyone who goes there can see!
I have had to reject a couple that were so personally insulting for no purpose and were defamatory - and I will continue to do so. All intelligent comments, including those vehemently disagreeing, are welcome as always.
Overall, the reality is that the more British Columbians learned about STV the more determined they were to reject it.
NO STV gave them that opportunity and as a result the 58% support STV had in 2005, when voters still knew little about it, dramatically shifted to 61% opposition despite the YES for STV side outspending NO STV by at least $200,000 and having 5000 volunteers, including those brought in from Ontario.
VivianLea Doubt
2 years ago
disagree, Bill
"Overall, the reality is that the more British Columbians learned about STV the more determined they were to reject it."
Really? I have been unable to identify many people in my fairly wide, politically sophisticated circle who comprehensively understand STV.
There are any number of conclusions to draw from the results, but the fact that voters rejected STV because they diligently examined it is not one I would draw.
Stuart
2 years ago
Stuart
We love you Rafe ,
Stuart here from CJSF radio saying that yourself and Save our Rivers could not have done more to
Bring this critical issue to the forefront. The day before the election I received an NDP flyer in the mailbox with “Stop the Privatization of our rivers as the first talking point”. In other words you managed to get this topic to the top of the opposition’s agenda.
So let’s deconstruct the results, to win the NDP had to hold all seats plus pick up 10 new ones which is a hard task in any election. The NDP made gains in all regions and lost many close battles, even in places that are traditional Liberal territory. The province is very split, The percentage of the vote gives the Liberals 46.02 , NDP 42.06, Greens 8.1 . So despite what CanWest Global says Gordon Campbell does not have a strong mandate (as he will discover if he goes ahead with these river projects)
The sad reality about our current democracy
1) We have a critically low voter turnout (only around 50% of the people actually voted)
When you think about that it kind of makes you shudder, 23-24% of the population can rule with impunity over the rest of us.
So what happened and what do we do to move forward, people are simply ill informed to the issues and have lost all sense of community.
We first have to claim a holy war on CanWest Global (now a penny stock and vulnerable) and CBC news which was more like a PR agency for the Liberals than a public broadcaster. All the work people did was simply washed away by these agencies that did not bother to report on so many critical issues, people still don’t understand the river projects and what they mean and think the BC Liberals are perceived to be green due to a 2 penny carbon tax, this is an incredible feat of propaganda, we need to face the fact that the media is corrupt and is the enemy of progress.
How can we fight back against our corrupt and dangerous media? If you get angry, don’t get angry at the ill informed apathetic public; get angry at the corrupt messenger that makes them that way.
Stuart
2 years ago
Stuart
Cont..
1) Support media democracy by supporting the independent media that actually does a great job. Kudos to thetyee, Georgia Straight, CJSF Radio 90.1 FM, Co-op Radio 102.7 FM, The Common Ground Magazine and others. Support them by getting as many people as you can to switch to them over from the corporate media.
2) Discredit the corporate media by pointing out there bias articles to as many people as you know, or point out what they are not telling the public.
3) Use the courts, be a pain in the ass, listen and file complaints with the CRTC, you may not win but you cause them to spend money they don’t have.
4) Boycott, contact advertisers and let them know your spreading petitions to boycott any business advertising on certain networks.
5) Protest and agitate as Jim Hightower puts it. An agitator," is the center post in a washing machine that gets all the dirt out."
6) Call into the call in shows, pretend you support the Government when they screen he call and they will put you on, use different names at pay phones, when you get on call them on their partisanship. You may get only a few seconds but imagine if hundreds did this daily.,
Make life hard for the corporate media as they have made life hard on us.
The next work is harder, reach out to your communities and create a space for dialogue like Save our rivers did. Keep it going, we need to build community and not just a month before the election. We need to organize the poor and working class who have given up on voting or any change. The rich always vote.
And lastly where the hell is labor, yes many did help on campaigns like Cope 378, what was missing was the big protests to gain public attention, Gordo purchased labor peace and many in labor may have voted for him, lets reenergize a quiet labor movement.
Thanks Rafe we love you, you have inspired 4 years of upcoming excitement, don’t worry no river goes without a mighty fight. You have laid the kindling.
grub
2 years ago
Apologies to Bill Tieleman
I incorrectly stated that Bill Tieleman was no longer accepting comments on his blog. My mistake; I didn't wait long enough for my comment to appear.
Sorry, Bill.
If you'll pardon just one more STV go-around. I fell into using Bill's terminology and labeled myself as pro-STV. OK, yes, I voted for STV, but I agree with Tieleman and Schreck; it's a very flawed system. I couldn't believe it when the CA presented it to the public.
What I am is ANTI-FPP. STV may be crap, but FPP is crappier. For me, it's as simple as that.
Gordo gave us an opportunity to alter the system. One of the few things I'll praise him for. And we missed an opportunity.
Too bad!
Roadie
2 years ago
Thanks Rafe
I'd just like to congratulate you on your many insightful articles and the wonderful effort you put forth in this election. Perhaps if the rest of us (and I definitely include myself) had tried a little harder we would not be faced with another four years of the expropriation of our rights and freedoms by the neocon gangsters/banksters/fraudsters which surely awaits us.
Incidentally, this massive theft is not local to BC, just look at what is happening in America, Iceland, Eastern Europe and many other parts of the world.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/
We are so screwed...
Gidget
2 years ago
What were Rafe's true motives?
I can't believe all of these negative comments from all of the pinkos out there.
I thought that Communism died?
I can't stand the treasons that you people ensue.
Get over the fact that my BC Liberal vote won here in Vancouver-Quilchena! My vote won, and yours didn't!
Do you really think that people care about useless issues such as the environment? To an extent yes. That is why I thought it was so brilliant to bring in a carbon tax that was opposed by the NDP and supported by the Greens and various groups of ecoterrorists and rabid environmentalistic quacks such as "Dr." David Suzuki.
The BC Liberals, under Gordon Campbell, are utterly undefeatable. The government can, and should, do anything that it pleases to do. The Campbell government succeeded on dividing you lefties to the far hilt!
The same tactics will work in 2013!
At least BC Liberals were not tainted with the scandals that the NDP had, such as candidates smoking marijuana, exposing themselves naked in front of young women, posting nude pictures of themselves on facebook, etc.
The BC Liberals ran a fair and clean campaign. They have an open and honest team that will carry British Columbia, the Best Place On Earth, forward.
Leftism is dead. Admit it.
Rafe Mair sold his soul to the NDP, and he lost big time on May 12th!
I am proud of how the BC election went on May 12th.
The sides of moral righteousness prevailed. The legions of hell and damnation were abated.
The socialist hordes were kept at the gates.
WAC Bennett, like his son William Richards Bennett, would be extremely proud of Gordon Campbell and his legacy of fiscal prudence, economic stewardship, and open government.
Wilfred Laurier
2 years ago
Self Promotion
"David is retired and my communications and strategy business would not be affected in the least"
So, Bill, how much did you get paid to sink Mel Lehman's campaign? I note the NDP loss was significantly greater than in 2005. How do you account for this and do you think your party will be so gullible to pay you again?
G West
2 years ago
Gidget
Loved your satire.
More please....lots more - haven't seen anything so enervating here since God's child stopped posting.
Wayne Smith
2 years ago
More of the same
Once again, one political party has ALL the power, even though most people voted against them.
Once again, most MLAs "represent" mostly people who voted against them, and most people are "represented" by people they voted against.
And apparently, all this is OK with most people in BC.
It's not OK with me, and I'm not going to stop saying so.
fleetson
2 years ago
"The BC Liberals ran a fair
"The BC Liberals ran a fair and clean campaign. They have an open and honest team that will carry British Columbia, the Best Place On Earth, forward."
This is exactly the problem. The Liberals really ran a campaign full of lies, dirty tricks, and corruption, but if you say the above often enough, people will begin to believe it. Look at the election results, we are again divided between the corporate elitists and the working class. Ridings where the socio economic ranking is high were taken by the liberals (neo cons- another misrepresentation), and poorer ridings were won by the NDP.
Give them four more years and BC, the Best Place on Earth, will be BC, the best place owned by others on Earth will be the title. We need to march in the streets about our rivers, our salmon, our land.
So no, the Liberals did not run a clean campaign, exactly the opposite, and lets see them fudge this budget again.
Rafe Mair was one of the best things about this election, along with the group he travelled with. We will continue to ask people to read the Tyee, and to work hard to get the message out.
I love British Columbia, but unfortunately, there are others who love B.C. as well, but for the wrong reasons. They are willing to bring her to her knees for profit, and we will just sit around shaking our heads and wondering what happened.
Our resources are so valuable that we need honest people to stand up for them, because our new government will only be willing to sell all of B.C. to the highest bidder. Four more years of worry and fear for me.
And again, this Liberal campaign was crooked, full of lies and a disgrace to democracy, but if the mainstream media pumps out the Liberal message that it was clean, the sheep will believe.
Frank
2 years ago
Gidget
Actually you may have missed their scandals but drunk driving, speeding constantly, using your position to buy ALR land and then removing it from the ALR and re-selling it for big profits do seem to me to also be scandals.
And of course there's a really really big scandal called BC Rail finally starting its way through the courts.
But of course if you think that's not as important as a kid grabbing a breast in facebook photo, well, we can only sigh.
Gidget
2 years ago
Frank & fleetson,
You forget how absolutely disgusting the NDP was back in the 1990s.
Do you people not remember how the economy tanked?
Do you not remember all of the scandals and corruption?
What is wrong with profit? Nothing. The economy is going strong.
As as a fact, I hope the government scraps any notion of a minimum wage. The market should dictate environmental protection, employment standards, and wages. The government has no business in those fields what-so-ever!
Yes, I believe that the NDP's candidate (original) in Vancouver-False Creek was absolutely abhorrent. It shows how poor the NDP's candidate screening is. A young man molesting a young girl should never be laughed at. Appalling.
And what about the NDP's policy regarding affirmative action in selecting women as candidates? Absolutely disgusting!
Why am I so opposed to Rafe? Because he turned his back on freedom, democracy, free enterprise, and the right to earn a profit. He sold his soul, and he knows it. How dare a former Socred minister of the Crown become such a disgusting turn coat. I absolutely detest his present views. I respect his past, but believe that his age has hurt his memory and political views. I feel sorry for his, and strongly encourage him to fully retire.
The economy is doing okay. The 2010 games are just around the corner, and everything is doing fine here in BC.
I am proud of our slogan, "The Best Place on Earth"
The NDP and Greens hate that slogan, as they are unpatriotic and possibly traitors to this bright and beautiful province.
Most of us do not give a damn what happens to BC Hydro. The lights will still come on. It may cost a bit more, but life will carry on.
The left will still be badly divided, and we will continue to do for this province as we see fit.
One of the chief things that should happen, is that the government should go after organized labour as hard as possible. The BCGEU should be stripped of its power, banned and closed forever. Public servants work for the electors, and they should not have the right to collective bargaining.
The liquor stores should be privatized, and its overpaid workers should be let go.
The government could easily contract out most of its programs and services, as it should.
Fess up, the left lost and the right won.
Frank
2 years ago
Gidget
"You forget how absolutely disgusting the NDP was back in the 1990s."
I guess I do.
"Do you people not remember how the economy tanked?"
Nope, although I hear the NDP only created 392,000 jobs unlike the measly 320,000 created by the Liberals. I hear the NDP had higher growth too.
"Do you not remember all of the scandals and corruption?"
Just one, Bingo-gate. Which occurred before Harcourt even took office. Whereas how many have the Liberals had? 10? 15?
"What is wrong with profit? Nothing. The economy is going strong."
Sure, if you call negative growth, growth.
"As as a fact, I hope the government scraps any notion of a minimum wage. The market should dictate environmental protection, employment standards, and wages. The government has no business in those fields what-so-ever!"
LOL, I think that would be great if you Liberals said that out loud.
"Yes, I believe that the NDP's candidate (original) in Vancouver-False Creek was absolutely abhorrent. It shows how poor the NDP's candidate screening is. A young man molesting a young girl should never be laughed at. Appalling."
Who are we talking about and are you telling me you've never touched a breast in your life? Why does that not surprise me?
"And what about the NDP's policy regarding affirmative action in selecting women as candidates? Absolutely disgusting!"
The Liberals did the same thing, they just didn't say they were doing it. In the end though, they still made sure some women candidates were put in place and everyone in the party knew about it, as did some of us outside the party.
"The economy is doing okay. The 2010 games are just around the corner, and everything is doing fine here in BC."
Oh sure, negative growth and #1 in Canada in child poverty and job losses. Keep it up eh.
"The NDP and Greens hate that slogan, as they are unpatriotic and possibly traitors to this bright and beautiful province."
Is your bomb shelter fully stocked?
"Most of us do not give a damn what happens to BC Hydro."
I know.
"The left will still be badly divided, and we will continue to do for this province as we see fit."
Yep, you'll continue to help friends and insiders and let everyone else go to hell.
"Fess up, the left lost and the right won."
Is there someone here who hasn't heard about the election result? I didn't think so.
dave49
2 years ago
STV's failure
The last referendum for STV had the advantage that it was coming off the work of the Citizens' Assembly and the resultant public awareness. Since then, we've had almost four years of silence on the issue. Then, we're back in campaign mode and it's the traditional underdog battle: an underfunded but well-meaning pro-campaign against no campaign that is very well funded by all the business interests that benefit from the status quo (First past the post).
It does not help that so-called progressives like Bill Tielmann opposed it.
I have my share of doubts about STV and don't understand the dynamics of the Citizens' Assembly that led them to choose a system that only three other countries used. Why not a more widely-used proportional representation system? Was the pursuit of the best option the undoing of electoral reform?
One of my concerns about STV was the complexity of counting and tabulating votes would inevitably lead to using computers. Given some of the issues of possible tampering with voting machines in elections in the USA, I distrust a system reliant on computers to tabulate votes. Vancouver's optical scanning system still requires paper ballots that can be counted manually to confirm the vote count. However, there were reports of some voting machines in the USA which did not retain the original voting information, so there is no way to verify.
Frank
2 years ago
@ Bill Tieleman
Hey Bill, turnout dropped below 50%. Electoral reform was defeated and many are saying they won't participate any more so next election the turnout will go even lower.
Its not enough to tinker with the edges, its been obvious for over a decade that our democracy is in serious trouble. But the pundits have continued to pooh-pooh us bloggers and therefore nothing has changed.
I'll act like an 11 year old here and say, I told you so.
If the election system was a company it would be going broke as fast as Can-West but just like Leonard Asper you and Shreck keep insisting on business as usual.
dave49
2 years ago
Gidget
Have you added up all the costs of the various commitments and projects of the Campbell Liberals? As a neighbour pointed out, the total is at least $13 billion.
Just wait until mid 2010, when the Olympic glow has worn off and we have to start paying those bills, including all the carbon offsets schools and hospitals will have to buy to be carbon-neutral. We'll have a made-in-BC recession. And that's not even talking about budget cuts and pressure for rollbacks that will hit us before the end of this year!
G West
2 years ago
Hey Gidget
You were doing better writing satire...Fact is, it's you who can't remember the 90s apparently.
Could you, for example, have a look at federal contributions to shared cost programs during that period...
I know it would require a little research, but you might actually learn something...and then you could get back to satire.
As a truth teller you're missing the boat.
grub
2 years ago
@ gidget...
gidget asks, "Do you people not remember how the economy tanked?"
Gidget, do you not remember what was going on in global economics at that time? Similarly, before you praise the brilliance of Gordo Liberal goverance with respect to the economy, you might want to reflect on global economics during his period in office.
Do you really think he had something to do with the housing bubble in the USA and the frantic economic expansion in China? I hope you're not that blind.
Neither Glen Clark nor Gordon Campbell can/should be either blamed or praised for their steering of the economy. BC is but a bit player in a much larger game; our Premiers have no control over that game.
For example, during the most recent boom period, when China was buying everything we had to offer, it wouldn't have mattered what the minimum wage was; $10, $12, $15... the Chinese would have kept on buying and the corporations would have kept on making huge profits. BC (Canada) is a pawn in global economics...
edhenderson
2 years ago
why?
Dear Rafe,
STV - why was the name STV instead of the understandable "Proportional Representation"? - PR everyone can understand.
Alexandra Morton - That Campbell won again and is so ignorant about fish farming is almost too much to take. British Columbians will need to march in enormous numbers to have any impact on this government. Have you ever received an intelligent response from them? I have not - they ignore anyone who disagrees with their agenda.
I know: that we cannot give up; that Campbell and his cronies are not doing this for the benefit of their grandchildren (he was not true in his acceptance speech); that I cannot waste more of your time reading this message. I hope that you continue the fight - I will and I hope that Alex will too, best, Ed
TYRONE
2 years ago
WHAT ELECTION???
Much to my disappointment with the voters, I must say I am NOT surprised at the outcome.
Featuring the opposition on any campaign literature has to be the most useless and disgusting activity in ANY election, especially when real Life and Death issues are begging for answers. -
I have attended so called 'all candidates meetings' and found them to be stacked against the attendees in the public's seats. The candidates should sit at their table with pencil and paper and take notes of the comments from the public gallery and keep their MOUTHS SHUT, for all they ever say is: #1 old news or no news and: #2 lies and more lies, because their empty promises are just that: EMPTY!
Then they should communicate their notes to their leaders and have THEM answer any and all questions to the general population, with the real consequence of having to answer in a court of law, if they lied.
As far as the STV is concerned, not only did most people not understand, that a travesty as this election past, would not happen under STV, but the slip handed to electors for this purpose of deciding this issue was, to say the least, a planned deception. When one opened the slip, only the 'status quo' came to view, unless one was looking for the KNOWN alternative further within the folds. This is, what caused many people to make their mark in the 'first past the polls' slot and thus the STV's
"goose was cooked"!
Sad to say, but once more the decision fell on the side of "rottenness"!