Opinion

Our World Class Olympic Village?

Southeast False Creek can showcase a better future.

By Helena Grdadolnik, 7 Mar 2006, TheTyee.ca

sefcsiteplan

The Olympic flag was passed to Vancouver last week. The city is now less than four years away from hosting the games but, until fairly recently, we have not seen much physical evidence of this fact.

That is soon to change.

Architectural and infrastructural projects are moving off the drawing board and on to construction sites as the Olympic deadline looms. In his inaugural speech last December, Mayor Sam Sullivan began by asking "When the world arrives in Vancouver in 2010, what kind of city will they find?"

This is an important question, but even more pertinent to the citizens of Vancouver is what kind of city will we be left with two weeks later?

Sullivan asked the council to "look at the games as an opportunity to help make our city a better place to live." Using the Olympics as a catalyst for urban improvement is the only sound reason for a city to host an international event of this stature; otherwise the games are just an expensive party.

To guarantee that the games are used to make Vancouver "a better place to live" as directed by the city's new mayor, we need to ensure that the sustainable vision outlined for the 2010 Olympics does not get watered down as the plans start to become realized in the next few years.

The time to invest

Much has been made recently about the new city council's changes to the housing mix on the site of the future Olympic Village in Southeast False Creek. The initial idea of one-third each low, middle and market housing has been amended (pending a public hearing on March 7) to a minimum of 20 percent low-income housing across the site, but a goal of 33 percent, and the planning department has been instructed to work directly with developers to find ways to achieve middle-income housing in the area.

Even with the possible reduction in social housing, the area can still be home to a community that is a model for livability and sustainability as long as its current official development plan does not continue to be tampered with. Although the potential decrease in social housing is short-sighted and unfortunate, it was not the only positive agenda for the site; there still remains a strong environmental strategy for Southeast False Creek.

Council's most recent proposal to decrease the amount of daycare facilities (from five to three) could have a negative impact on the plan to reduce vehicle requirements for families that move into the area, but the official development plan still includes other measures to minimize auto use: bicycle lanes, pedestrian paths, bus routes and a nearby RAV stop. There will be a grocery store and other retail through the heart of the community along the main north-south street as well as a mix of restaurants and shops as part of the waterfront. Sports fields, seawall and re-naturalized areas will make up the rest of the site.

The planning department has proposed the non-motorized boating facility and community centre as a special project to demonstrate innovative environmental technologies such as black water recycling (taking the building's own waste water and cleaning it on site). At present, a black water recycling system is prohibitively expensive to install for conventional use, but if you consider the educational value of the demonstration and the investment in sustainable technologies, then it is money well spent.

This is a critical moment to invest in the city's future. If we don't have money for social housing and environmental building in the years leading up to the 2010 games, when will we have the cash?

Taking the LEED?

Construction for Southeast False Creek's infrastructure is already underway and includes progressive solutions for conserving energy and water resources: heating through ground-source as well as heat transfer from insulated high temperature sewer lines, green roofs for 50 percent of the development and a high percentage of native vegetation, some of which will act to collect and clean storm water in combination with swales along the north-south streets. Many new ideas are being tested on the site, including a pilot project for collecting compost from residents (as is now commonplace in Toronto), a vessel composter for the park board land and, most importantly, a new green building strategy.

With construction, renovation and demolition waste representing about one third of the 20 million tons of solid waste sent to landfills in Canada each year and buildings accounting for more than 30 percent of the nation's greenhouse gas emissions, green building initiatives need to be taken seriously. Last November, city staff in the planning department presented a report to council outlining a green building strategy for all new construction regulated under part three of the Vancouver building by-law (generally, this means all buildings four stories and higher). What is recommended in the document is to review and revise the city's building by-laws to set a new green building baseline that would be equivalent to LEED certification.

What is LEED? The acronym stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. It was developed five years ago as a rating system to prevent false claims of green construction (also known as 'greenwashing'). A project receives credits from five categories (sustainable sites, water efficiency, energy and atmosphere, materials and resources and indoor environmental quality) as well as possible extra points for innovation.

Making green the standard

In 2004, Vancouver was the first city in North America to adopt LEED Gold as the minimum standard for its new municipal construction. Many of the other municipalities in the GVRD have since adopted LEED for their own buildings; this is not only good for the environment, but also will mean millions of taxpayer's dollars saved from long-term operating costs.

According to Karis Hiebert, project planner for Vancouver, many recommendations for the green building strategy came out of the work on the Southeast False Creek Official Development Plan. Staff looked for smart design and construction choices that could be made without prohibitive cost implications. Virtually all buildings in Vancouver already achieve 11 of the 26 credits required to become LEED certified simply because of their urban context (eg. access to public transit) and due to existing building code and by-law regulations (eg. carbon dioxide monitoring for public spaces). The remaining 15 credits could easily be achieved through the proposed by-law revisions.

If accepted, Vancouver's green building strategy will, according to the planning report, "significantly improve market penetration of green building practices and technologies in Vancouver. This will help bring costs down and increase professional capacity, providing an opportunity to create a complementary economic development strategy to create a competitive position for Vancouver." The green building strategy could be implemented in less than one year. If other municipalities in BC and Canada follow Vancouver's example, this could mean that over the next couple of years, LEED could go from being an achievement for an elite group of buildings to becoming a minimum standard for all new construction.

As 2010 approaches, we need to ensure that we are using the winter games to build a positive legacy for Vancouver. The current plans for Southeast False Creek are designed to leave Vancouver with a model of a livable community that can be replicated elsewhere in the region, instead of a bad Olympic hangover.

Helena Grdadolnik will be writing an occasional series on architecture in British Columbia for The Tyee. We acknowledge the support of the Canada Council for the Arts which last year invested $17.6 million in visual arts throughout Canada. Grdadolnik is an architecture critic and an instructor at the Emily Carr Institute of Art and Design. She can be reached at hgrdadol@eciad.ca  [Tyee]

42  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • willy

    5 years ago

    Comments on "Our World Class Olympic Village?"

    What a crock of bull, words like a positive legacy for Vancouver-Vancouver a better place to live. Not one mention of the rest of the province. If Vancouver wants the games then Vancouver should pay for the games. The so called sea to sky highway gets 600 million for a rebuild and the government makes a big announcement that the rest of the provice will get a grand total of 90 million for road improvements-whoopie ding. Before you lower mainland latte drinkers flame me, 75% of the province income comes from the interior. You are redundent to us. The sooner BC gets split into another province and cuts the lower mainland loose the better. Also you can have Kelowna.

  • ubiquitous

    5 years ago

    Not to nitpick willy but of British Columbia's population of 4.3 million, about 2.5 million of that come from the Greater Vancouver and Capital Region combined.

  • Grumpy

    5 years ago

    What is 'Green' anyways? Certainly in the GVRD 'Green' building standards mean that the buildind will turn 'green' with leaky condo syndrom rot in about 5 years.

    Like all Olympic villages, ours will look pretty dreary a couple of years after 2010, when all the hype and hoopla dies down.

  • Bucky

    5 years ago

    Willy, I agree you. I live in Coquitlam and work in Vancouver. I'm going to benefit from new bridges, upgraded roads, new RAV line and the economic spinoffs from the Olympics. We need this infrastructure upgrade but so do the communities in the BC interior. The BC Libs only have to look at the results of the last election to see that they're alienating the rural voters. They should throw some of their budget surplus at fixing issues for smaller rural communities instead of only focussing on the cities and offering token dollars to interior communities.

  • jim beam

    5 years ago

    again with the "we gotta better plan".

    plans that are not all inclusive are not going to benefit ALL British Columbians.

    when you leave out the Social Housing the province loses out any benefit of the experiment.

    no Guts,no Glory

  • Colin

    5 years ago

    I hear that FEMA has a whole bunch of trailers their not using, cheap and then we can move them to Ft Murry.

    ;-)

  • jim beam

    5 years ago

    i say we stick the athletes in those moldy old trailers to advance science.

    see how healthy bodies cope with sickness' the poor have to live with in their lives.

    see if there is any gold at the end of that rainbow mister.

  • Colin

    5 years ago

    Hey, I was trailer trash when I lived in a small town for awhile, I was also working for $5 an hour slinging beer. All for the love of a girl. Not every trailer is moldy, some of them are pretty decent.

  • jim beam

    5 years ago

    trailer trash...

    says everything right there !

  • bpither1

    5 years ago

    I was proud of the southeast False Creek development as it directed funds from our "contingency fund" into badly needed social housing. Ever since the feds abrogated their direct responsibility we have seen a spike in homelessness. No many seem to care either despite the rhetoric

  • Colin

    5 years ago

    Jim
    About your other comment about poor people and sickness, some of the toughest people I every knew where the homeless or bushrats. Quite amazing what they will survive. I saw one guy hit by a car flew over the hood and landed on the street, we ran over to give First Aid, he got up told us to go screw ourselves and staggered away. You will get the same type of stories from the ambulance attendants.

  • jim beam

    5 years ago

    we are living in a nihlistic world where it's get what you can and screw everyone else.

    the only time the poor are treated half a$$esd is when they are enlisted as cannon fodder.

    then the right winged scream...be a patriot !
    it's OUR Country YOU are FIGHTING for...

    watch for the DRAFT to be initiated by HARPER and watch the homeless disapear.

    there is your housing solution thanx to creeps like Campbell,et al.

    false creek is for the RICH and don't ever forget it.

  • mcdull

    5 years ago

    Has anyone ever wondered if perhaps instead of wasting millions of dollars on sports, we should use it for education, health care, low income housing, and I repeat, education? I understand that those who've worked hard to become exceptional athletes deserve the recognition and chance to showcase their talent, but what about the rest of us? There are real problems all around BC, maybe attempt to fix them before bringing in the rest of the world? You'd clean your house before inviting friends over, wouldn't you?

  • Colin

    5 years ago

    Some of my Senior Sergeants/Warrant Officers started out in the army with the Judge giving them the option of jail or army when they were 18. They all said it was the best dam thing to happen to them and several where being offered well paying jobs on civiy street when they retired.

    Draft in Canada? Only if you leave your window open.

    By the way the army doesn’t want Cannon Fodder and expect you to have at least a grade 12 education to even be considered now and most young people tell me that it is tough to meet their requirements.

    Meanwhile back in False Creek, what about the pollution? Canron used to be a nickel, galvanizing and chroming plant and the site is quite polluted, who gets to pay for the clean up?

    There won’t be many poor left in the area as the increase in property values is driving them East and elsewhere. Don’t know how many homeless are currently using the area but I am guessing perhaps 10-15 in the area marked on the map.

    Nothing wrong with spending a reasonable money on sports as a healthy active society reduces stress on the healthcare system. But I agree that the Olympics in Vancouver/Whistler is a wasted opportunity, far better if it had been held in the Interior where there might have been a better payoff for the province as a whole.

  • Gavin

    5 years ago

    mcdull:

    Actually, when I have friends over I usually just cram everything into the closest closet. Then I forget about it for a few months. Then when it pops out again, I use it as an excuse to throw it in the bin in the back alley.

    Unfortunately... I wouldn't be surprised if Gordo and Sam do the same thing for their "house parties".

  • G West

    5 years ago

    Sam 'talks' a good show; Gordo doesn't even do that! But, it'll be a great party.
    Colin:
    I heard they're now taking enlistees in the US who haven't got their GED. Dunno about a draft but a few more dead Canadians in Afghanistan and we'll be having trouble finding recruits here too.

    And yet in Toronto yesterday they had a funeral for a horse!

    Strange times.

  • jim beam

    5 years ago

    i am one who beleives we should honour our beasts of burden.

    both human...and equine

    and indeed,we have always lived in strange times

  • rockerbiff

    5 years ago

    Let's look at the realities of hosting the 2010 Olympics -

    increased road traffic, increased pollution, increased congestion, increased fatalities due to all of the above and more single occupancy numb nut drivers passing through east van.

    This athlete village is a mere scam for more million dollar condos that none of us will ever afford, it is naive for anyone to think otherwise.

    At a cost of $4 billion the true legacy of the these games will be the debt left to our children.

    Just so 5000 athletes and NGO reps can party on our doorstep on our tab - screw the NDP for bringing it to us and Liberals for perpetrating the crime.

  • rockerbiff

    5 years ago

    If you want to see the reality of the 2010 Olympics, here is the web site

    http://2010watch.com

  • G West

    5 years ago

    rockerbiff
    I take it you won't be voting for Davie boy if a bye election comes to pass, I'll check out the site.

  • Colin

    5 years ago

    Gwest
    Did you see the story on how Canada was going to cut the funding for a program that pays Afghan Widows so they can eat and survive?

    A mere 2.5m a year, after they protested and letters were sent, the government has relented to continue funding. If you withdraw the troops you can kiss the PRT’s and the work they and the NGO’s do goodbye, a tough choice.

    It would be good if the West would buy up the poppy crop, this would remove a significant funding source for the Taliban/AQ and by getting the farmers to plant a ¼ of their farms with food crops, paying the difference, you can get more local food in the rural areas. It would certainly be a cheaper option than allowing the Taliban to get the money and then have to fight them.

  • G West

    5 years ago

    Colin
    No question. We also have to be willing to buy much of whatever they can produce - textiles and the like - so that they can develop an economy that doesn't just depend upon poppy growing. So often, the west has erected tariff barriers that prevent developing nations from making a hard currency living at the same time we give them aid to buy agricultural products and goods that tend to suppress and sometimes cancel out their own efforts to produce food and develop sustainable commerce. USAID programs and agricultural aid policies have been some of the worst offenders in this respect - and when changes have been suggested there's usually some pork-barrel reason Senators and Congressmen from the mid west find to prevent improvement. Canada, lately, in that respect has improved its approach markedly.
    I think it's a tough row our troops have to hoe over there and I wish them well - it's not going to be a picnic…the ground has not been well prepared for them.

  • rac

    5 years ago

    From a transportation point of view SEFC is pretty pathetic for a development that strives to be a model sustainable community. First of all, it should be car free with parking at the edges (perhaps garages along 2nd Avenue or at the Canada Line Station).

    As in stands, every street has automobile access whether it is needed or not. People have several convinent routes to access their condos by car while transit users will have to walk to 2nd, Main Street Station or the Canada Line station to catch transit. There currently is no money for the street car. It might take 10-20 years for the street car to be built.

    They even refused to make the Ontario Greenway car free through the site even though it is not required for access. Regarding cycling, the facilities are OK but definately not up to the standard required for a model sustainable community.

    In a lot of ways, the city did better 30 years ago with South False Creek. So much for progress.

    It appears as if sustainability is driving your hybrid Lexus to your LEED Gold $2 million condo.

  • jim beam

    5 years ago

    good points,rac,and the europeans have shown us the way the GREENS think over there decades ago.
    we could have utilized much of their greenbelt policies and some of their housing policies.
    the Dutch come to mind quickly because of their limited spaces and novel land,housing issues.

    but no! we here can IGNORE all the previous examples and build WHAT WE WANT BECAUSE WE GOT THE LAND AND THE MONEY.

    at least thats what they think like at the top.

    don't believe me,look at the money they're spending on the Olympics.

    they have ILLUSIONS OF GRANDUER!...if we had those same illusions...we would be put on medications.

    they are given a blank cheque...

    and we quietly go back to work hoping they won't screw up,that they will make things better for all.

  • Mel from Calgary

    5 years ago

    Do Paris, New York and London tout themselves as world class cities?

    If you describe yourself as "world class" then you are not!

  • Colin

    5 years ago

    Building in a track system for the old electric street car and making modern copies would be great for Vancouver and for tourism. Vancouver used to have a great trolly system. The North Vancouver system had a wee problems with brakes coming down Lonsdale.

  • G West

    5 years ago

    Mel from Calgary
    It's a sign of fundamental insecurity Mel, however, I'll go along with the 'world class' bs when we in vancouver admit we've got a world class drug problem and world class homelessness and world-class unaffordable real estate. I'm sure you can think of a few world class ironies for Calgary too.

    Colin:
    And why not use the arbutus corridor for light rail to Richmond and to serve the west side too? Anybody familiar with public transit in Europe gets a real kick out of our system.

  • Colin

    5 years ago

    I have to admit that it gave a me a chuckle that the RAV option had to pass through rich neighbourhood A or rich neighbourhood B, I guess the NPA was glad to be out of office for that one. I seem to remember that the Arbutus corridor was part of the Interurban line to Richmond in the past? It also used to extend across False creek on a wooden trestle of which you can still see the abutments on the SE side of the burrard bridge.

  • G West

    5 years ago

    Yeh! public transit in BC is rife with ironies!

  • allan

    5 years ago

    It's unfortunate the author threw so much positivism into the mix that some of the environmental projects haven't sparked much comment.

    I especially like the composting plan, but after enduring what I thought was the craftings of a public relations specialist determined to convince me back onside the games, the intended message got a bit lost.

    Never was onside, but that's another issue.

    The games were sold to Vancouverites on the basis that one third of the housing in the False Creek project would be social housing, a legacy of sorts to the little people who only pay taxes and won't make it to Whistler for the fireworks.

    But then there is a growing popularity with this type of politics in Vancouver, isn't there?

    Here you had the whole pro-Olympics group talking of a new Vancouver for the games. If people supported having the games they would see hundreds of new social housing units spring up almost immediately after the games.

    One look at the crowded nightmares many people call home in parts of Vancouver ought to be enough to convince anyone the need for more is an understatement.

    No doubt a great many thought that alone was reason enough to take on the games burden.

    Resident gave their support and before you can say "we now have a very developer friendly council", social housing is cut back.

    "Let the marketplace decide," is the pathetic excuse, as though the marketplace has done a damned thing so far other than to object.

    It's also hard to forget that the federal politician in the driving seat in this mess is none other than David Emerson, formerly Liberal MP for Vancouver-Kingsway.

    He got re-elected as a Liberal and then, before he was even sworn in, he became the Conservative MP for Vancouver-Kingsway even though a Conservative was the last thing voters wanted.

    People in Vancouver Kingsway, who got screwed on both votes must be wondering who to trust anymore.

    I suspect a few of them will read about the compost stuff but only sense the manure smell that permeates the politics on this.

  • tommymoore

    5 years ago


    Quote:
    As 2010 approaches, we need to ensure that we are using the winter games to build a positive legacy for Vancouver.

    Ya gotta larf when this platitude is spewed. Positive legacy being a crushing debt, unneeded highway, crappily constructed leaky condos, empty infrastructure (curling anyone?) and LESS money for the elderly, poor, and disadvantaged children. To waste tax money on a 17 day jockfest is unconscionable and indefensible. The only beneficiaries are the greedy developers, who will ramp up costs as the date appraches to astronomical levels, further gouging the whole province and eroding needed public services. Funny that the symbol - an inukshuk, is made of the same material as the millstone of debt the winter olympics represents.

  • G West

    5 years ago

    I gotta say, expo 86 all over again, just different folks doin' the strokin'.

  • Colin

    5 years ago

  • G West

    5 years ago

    Colin

    I've been following that. Pretty expensive photocopying in my opinion but fun nonetheless. Never having been too enamoured with the Liberals and I doubt a new leader is going to save the world.
    I think I prefer the Daily Show for humour though, and the Colbert Repor(t) as well. Stewart had a sweet interview with Shakey (Neil Young) last night. DId you see it?
    CHeers.

  • Colin

    5 years ago

    No, my 15month old has successfully overthrown the previous ruler of the house and we are all condemned to watching shows that involve various stuffed animals singing and dancing.

  • G West

    5 years ago

    Colin
    I remember the days. The last 2 of my 4 kids were less than a year apart (don't ask!) so I know whereof you speak. I found the worst part of it was operating on less than 4 hours sleep for what seemed like an eternity.

    You need to get satellite TV so you can timeshift! The daily show broadcasts at a decent hour for the Eastern region and that means you can pick it up here before you collapse each night.

    I hope you didn't think my using 'sweet' in that reference up above was an attempt at being 'with-it' - long given up on that. I meant Young has mellowed into a wonderful guy, very loveable in a non-threatening way. And still the best out of tune popular singer I know of. I remember hearing that David Foster once told Young that he was off key when they were making a recording, it was one of those 'save the world' recording sessions, and Young replied: 'Ya Man, that's my style!'
    Cheers dude.

  • Colin

    5 years ago

    G west
    That’s funny I am so not “with it” that I didn’t even notice the term “sweet”

    I remember a conversation with a kid in I think the 90’s. I asked him why his shoelaces were undone, he replied: “Because it’s radical” I told him that being a radical in my day meant fighting for something you believed in and risking, injury, death or jail.

    Language is never dead eh? I wonder how a scholar dredging through a copy of this site in two hundred years will interpet our comments.

  • thomas49

    5 years ago

    on the news last night it was very noticeable the discomfort of one david emerson,his eyes darted around like a cornered rat

    he also scampered out the back gate in haste after the ceremonies...

    and did you notice the police presence around the lone protestor that was inside...wow !

    those ceremonies sure showed us we are not welcome iffin we iz common folk,know whut i mean,jelly bean ?

    so it's a world affair iffin ya got sum monies

  • G West

    5 years ago

    Yes, it was, ummm....enlightening to see him scuttle away out the back door in the little black VW. But at least he's agreed to cooperate with Shapiro; which is not something one can say about our fearless PM.
    really 'common' folks are these elitist characters who slide along the surface like slime in a lava lamp - always on top.

  • thomas49

    5 years ago

    i just came back from a nice bike ride and on that ride a little black volkswagen passed me by...like the one emer$on escaped in!

    i started laughing at how slow i was(mentally)in not recognizing the irony of that arrogant politician(emer$on)sneaking out the back gate...in the PEOPLES WAGON...

    i have been giggling since and i think following the political scene all these years ...just might be getting to me

    somebody help!i need a CUERVO fast.

  • G West

    5 years ago

    Thomas
    For a while I feared that irony might be dead...or going unnoticed. Truth proceeds, after all, on several levels: Hope you had a nice ride!!

  • _brian_

    5 years ago

    Once again someone has a bland and grand developer plan for Vancouver but now it is based upon doing something "right" and green, opposed to high rise development. Still Vancouver comes away with a boring environment that will be eventually populated by people with the most money. It is being passed off as something amazing and green but it is too little too late. Nothing can help the stripping of culture that used to exist in Vancouver this city has become a bland cultural void with a load of hype about how amazing and beautiful it is. Take a look around you, Vancouver it is one ugly city. I would not mind if some amazing design was applied to the development in the last 20 years but it is a repetition of bland highrise development.
    I wish I could fake my optimism and pride in this city like many people that are sucked in by fake culture thrust upon them by politicians and developers. This city is always reinventing itself, getting rid of any sense of identity over and over always trying to be a "big city" an "international city".
    Most of the people that used to make up this culturally diverse city have been displaced by high property costs generated by developers. Hardly anyone can afford a great home. This last and small corner of false creek will not be affordable to anyone that would make an interesting cultural contribution to Vancouver. Just walk along false creek seawall now and you will feel how cold and unwelcoming it is. Same goes for Yale Town with it's lack of real business that build neighborhoods and communities. Everything is upscale, expensive and instant, all selling the same produce you can buy cheaper a few "inconvenient" blocks away.
    This Olympic development is based upon spending large amounts of money and can only be baled out after it is all over by attracting big buyers to buy the dwellings but it is an instant dream with a phony hope of adding to Vancouver culturally. Vancouver thought green in the 70's and those concepts could have turned Vancouver into a far more interesting city but that way of thinking was pushed aside by greed and made to sound ridiculous. Now we get a small corner of false creek to see it happen after Vancouver has been transformed into one of the ugliest and most boring cities in the world. It is not the people that have made Vancouver it is developers. They create this shell make tons of cash and expect everyone to fill it up with instant culture.
    The Olympic Village concept would have never have happened if it was not for the Olympics it is like someone is saying "Damn Vancouver looks like crap we better create something to wow people when they start looking at us in 2010". Something other than high rises with a Seven Eleven at the base of it with crack heads clustered in front of the door every 3 blocks. What is with this city and damn Seven Elevens everywhere? Stop already!

    • No best comments selected by an editor for this story yet. To see all comments, click the All Comments tab, above.
    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.