Opinion

Dix Dials It Down

NDP leader prepares for government by moderating plans and expectations.

By Bill Tieleman, 13 Dec 2011, TheTyee.ca

adrian-dix.jpg

Adrian Dix: Fresh off BC NDP's best fundraiser, modest promises.

Related

"Only actions give life strength; only moderation gives it charm." -- Jean Paul Richter, 1763-1825

The B.C. New Democratic Party convention last weekend was a public display intended to show voters it's ready to govern moderately and wisely, but another earlier event was actually the more important signal.

That took place Nov. 9, when 650 people attend a $395 per person dinner at the Hotel Vancouver -- making it the party's most successful fundraiser ever.

But who was there to hear NDP leader Adrian Dix speak was more important than the fact that the event grossed over a quarter-million dollars.

It was informally billed as a business outreach event -- and it was, with company executives, lobbyists and advisors connected with the B.C. Liberals in strong attendance. [There were no media invited to the event -- but I was there.]

Among those spotted: Mark Jiles, business partner of B.C. Liberal top operative Patrick Kinsella at the Progressive Group; Mark Reder, a senior vice president at Fleishman-Hillard Canada and a former B.C. Liberal constituency president; and Byng Giraud, Imperial Metals vice president and part of B.C. Liberal Education Minister George Abbott's past leadership campaign.

Surprising twist

Dix gave the crowd a surprising message -- the party had gone too far in the 1990s under premiers Mike Harcourt and Glen Clark when it introduced hundreds of new acts -- "too much legislation" he said.

His administration, Dix said, would tell voters what it planned to do before the election and how it would pay for it.

Dix added one additional qualification: "I don't deliver different messages to business and labour."

Dix, whose NDP leadership bid I supported, further contradicted some of his early critics -- who saw him as too dogmatically left wing -- by stating: "Government cannot solve all the problems in B.C."

NDP delegates would hear a similar message last Saturday: don't expect an overly activist government.

Economy first

Nonetheless, Dix brought the crowd to its feet by promising "we'll do bold things" but would also be strategic.

Then he said he'd fix the party’s major failing when it lost the 2009 election.

"Making the economy the primary issue in the next election is what we're going to do," Dix said.

But lest anyone think Dix, who was Clark's chief of staff in the mid 1990s, was solely appealing for big business votes, he added this.

"We're going to roll back the corporate income tax rate connected to the carbon tax to 2008 levels so we will have money to invest in issues of public transit, retrofitting of public buildings, in supporting rural communities and in fighting inequality," Dix said.

And while most were impressed that Dix delivered his more than hour-long speech entirely without notes, it seemed to go unnoticed that he never once mentioned Premier Christy Clark by name. Nor did he do so at the high-priced fundraising dinner.

Depth, and a dig

Whether by accident or more likely by design, Dix is contrasting his encyclopedic grasp of a wide range of issues with former talk show host Clark's decidedly skimpy depth on public policy.

Dix only came close to referring to Clark's name once, when he jokingly told the 600 delegates that: "Our movement is not about the leader, we're not renaming this the B.C. Adrian Party any time soon." That jibe, of course, aimed at the B.C. Liberal Party's new logo, which features "Christy" in bigger type than "Liberal".

Dix is betting that substance will beat style, especially in what is now a long campaign until the May 2013 fixed-date election.

Balanced populism

What else Dix is doing is clear: building a carefully crafted message that balances the public's desire for populist change after 10 years of corporate government with an understanding that alienating business is not an easy road to victory.

Dix also knows that the more polling indicates an NDP election victory in 2013, the more he needs to both dampen high party expectations and reassure business that an NDP government won't damage an increasingly frail B.C. economy.

It's a difficult tightrope for any social democratic party leader to walk at the best of times. Now, with the United States still in economic trouble and several European states tottering towards potential financial disaster, it's an even more perilous balancing act.

And Dix knows better than anyone that when it comes to an NDP government in British Columbia, you are always working at great heights without a net.  [Tyee]

91  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • zalm

    23 weeks ago

    Ordinarily

    I'd be rolling my eyes at the potential for blowing one's left foot off when I see policy coming out so far in advance of any election, like when Tieleman quotes Dix:

    "We're going to roll back the corporate income tax rate connected to the carbon tax to 2008 levels so we will have money to invest in issues of public transit, retrofitting of public buildings, in supporting rural communities and in fighting inequality," Dix said."

    However, given that Ms Christy has tossed up so many, many policy flyers into the prevailing wind, if only to see which ones fall more heavily than others, I can't complain about a bit of honesty here. Certainly beats "Free nicotine patches for everyone, regardless of whether or not you are already wealthy enough to pay for your own."

    I think this is one election when the NDP could run the proverbial "fence post with hair" and clout the liberals senseless, while the Conservatives kick them in the goolies. It would appear that BC business agrees, yet wants to make sure they really do have an option in a guy with more smarts than some of the Nobel Prize winners coming out of Stockholm these days.....

  • MichaelT

    23 weeks ago

    uhhm gender and ? quotas for

    uhhm gender and ? quotas for electoral office?

    Please, this is why Carole james never made it. Tell me this is not happening again.

  • paisley

    23 weeks ago

    Where was BC Rail and corruption?

    What? Adrian didn't mention political corruption and how it is time to clean up government and the scoundrels that inhabit the upper echelons. Guess that's not important to voters? What a schmuck! If you don't have credibility then you don't have any respect. Be prepared for the worst voter turn out in BC history Adrian...atta boy.

  • igbymac

    23 weeks ago

    Deja Vu?

    "Making the economy the primary issue in the next election is what we're going to do," Dix said.

    "It's the economy, stupid": Bill Clinton's campaign slogan for 1992 Presidential election.

    At least there is no hiding exactly what Dix stands for -- a right-of-centre capitalist without a fundamental fix in his game-book.

    Too bad there isn't an honest politician on the scene who can simply and clearly convey to the people, at large, that a truly democratic government is in place to serve the people, not the economy.

    But I digress ... with Rick Salutin

  • hg

    23 weeks ago

    Economy

    Adrian Dix is exactly the type of leader we need. He knows that he has to make the economy work for the average wage earners, so they can actually make a living. There is nothing inherently wrong with the economy, except that it has been hijacked by the large corporations. This not only sucks the lifeblood out of wage earners, but also out of small and medium sized businesses.

  • alive

    23 weeks ago

    Keeping the James flaws going

    Guess that Dix will be the last male leader of the NDP?
    Assuming the averages, we will see all vacancies filled with female candidates in a decade.
    Guess by then the proverbial fencepost with hair needs to have that hair set up in curlers?

    For a politician who has carefully planned the course of the NDP, Dix overlooked the fact that female candidates generally are not as successful.

    Further he is scrapping good people by banisheing them regardless of their qualifications.

    In my riding we are stuck with a female member who has the appeal of a shrieking witch, and no possibility of replacing her with a more acceptable person -- bad policy DIX.

  • DPL

    23 weeks ago

    Alive mentions a female

    Alive mentions a female candidate with no appeal. I don't understand his concern. And to blame Adrian Dix is a bit of a stretch. He wasn't the one who insisted on the gender equal thingy. The members decide. I liked the article and especially the bit where things take some time to sort out. He is head and shoulders over the hot liner MS. Christy, who loved to do photo ops then move on to somewhere else

  • Fiat lux

    23 weeks ago

    Dix can jump up and down to

    Dix can jump up and down to please the multinational corporate mafia. If the NDP gets elected they'll do their best, from day one, to wreck BC's economy, as they have done it in the 90s, to "prove" that they're the only solution.

    They have been given so much power by various pimp governments that we're now living under their dictatorship, using imaginary money as weapons of conquest and enslavement.

    Ed Deak.

  • ron wilton

    23 weeks ago

    BC Rail

    The honest citizens of BC, want and deserve a complete and thorough official examination of the entire BC Rail robbery and show trial.

    Unless and until the NDP clearly state, unequivocally, that they 'will' initiate such an inquiry, they will not get my vote or support.

    When they do, my cheque will be in the mail.

  • rantnic

    23 weeks ago

    THE ECONOMY SUCKS!

    The school of economics, born in Chicago in the 60's has been sucking the life blood out of our social order for the last 35 years. Government is supposed to be a social organization not a business, a business set up to keep that economic ideal going. In this case Mr. Deak, you are wrong when you say "If the NDP gets elected they'll do their best, from day one, to wreck BC's economy, as they have done it in the 90s, to "prove" that they're the only solution." B.C.'s economy has already gone to hell in a hand basket driven there by the corporate drivers of our economy and the shills they are getting elected. Will the N.D.P. be any better? Probably not. Will we make any real gains in the next election? Only if they are social gains and not economic ones. The economic gains will only continue to keep food from the mouths of hungry children right here in or wealthy province of B.C..

    Let's vote for the "economy" and damn the poor, the marginal, the old, the ill, the working poor and anyone else that doesn't support this false economy that feeds a corporate machine, that has no head, no heart and no social conscience.

  • Frank

    23 weeks ago

    Dix is doing a good job

    A year ago the NDP ousted Carole James amid cries that she wasn't left-wing enough. "Anyone would be better" us James loyalists were told.

    Well, now we have people complaining about her successor too because he's following many of the same paths she did.

    I'm happy with Dix, he's the smartest guy that we'll have ever had as premier and he's got a very strong record on social justice.

    But if people would prefer not to vote because Christy Clark isn't so bad that's their right.

    I will add that there's always an alternative for those of you not happy with Dix, you can run your own candidates and vote for them or even yourselves. That does require more time and energy than posting to a forum however so I won't hold my breath.

  • Frank

    23 weeks ago

    Gender balance

    As has been pointed out, the membership of the NDP voted for this policy.

  • Macb423

    23 weeks ago

    NDP brand

    Did anyone hear Moe Sahota on CBC yesterday. I thought he did a crappy job addressing the biggest problem for the NDP: the "branding" issue. They have been unfairly branded as poor stewards of the economy, when they were no worse than the Liberals, and poor fiscal managers, when their last two budgets were balanced. The other two panelists brought up this branding problem while seeming to agree that the branding was accurate. Did Moe address this? Naah, he was more interested in irrelevant political strategizing re: the BC Conservatives.

    I hope the NDP can stick to the message, and hit back on the phony branding issue. Otherwise, get ready for a 4th Liberal Government.

  • cboo44

    23 weeks ago

    HUH?

    "The B.C. New Democratic Party convention last weekend was a public display intended to show voters it's ready to govern moderately......"

    Then why on earth did the executive bring in a couple of ultra left wing-nuts from the US to speak ?? Oh, I get it! "Something for everyone". And a unanimous "election" for "Moe", the paid for big labour puppet.
    Sorry, I think the "Party of Mixed Messages" lost some much-needed credibility with that convention shin-dig. Something they just didn't need to do.

  • Fiat lux

    23 weeks ago

    The fraudulent

    The fraudulent Austrian/Chicago School monetary economic theories of von Hayek and Friedman, now used to brainwash students with everywhere, have pushed the world to mass murder, destruction and impending mass disaster, with an accounting system that uses no debit, or liability columns.

    I was on the ecological economics list of the U of Colorado some 15 years ago, where we didn't hide behind false chickenshit names, but used our own and addresses.

    Many contributors have warned about this coming disaster even then. I also received a number of offlist comments from students, who complained that they knew that what were were brainwashed with was garbage, but had no choice, they had to use it in their term and exam papers to please the professors, if they wanted to pass.

    Of course, once they received their degrees they were employed by major corporations who demanded the same BS answers.

    The most pathetic note I received once was from an instructor at the U of Waterloo, who complained that they had to teach the crap, if they wanted to keep their jobs. There was also a large campaign in US universities at the time, weeding out instructors who didn't toe the official line, with a number of them fired.

    What we have now are economists, even in the NDP, who have been brainwashed by the same junk science, ignoring tomorrow and concentrating only on the monetary figures of today, albeit with packages of Band Aids in their pockets. They may know that something is badly wrong, but are so hooked to the system that they can't change, or dare to tell the leaders, called the SEIC, the Steely Eyed Inner Core, by disgruntled members of what really is going on.

    As a long time NDP member myself, hoping and waiting for a miracle of awakening, I've been trying to find out for years what plans the party has to save people when the crash comes ?

    No official answer, albeit when I had a private meeting with Carole James in the summer of last year, I was surprised that she knew all the problems and the answers, but never talked about them in public. Sihota was and is nowhere.

    This is the same problem all over the world, with nobody daring to stand up and call a fraud a fraud.

    A world class professor friend in the sustainability field asked me to write a paper for his PhD candidate students for debate. Haven't had any answers yet, but it will be interesting to see what they will be ?

    Interesting article on post autistic economics, going on since the '60s:
    http://www.paecon.net/HistoryPAE.htm

    Ed Deak.

  • JR

    23 weeks ago

    My problem with the current NDP

    My problem with the current NDP is Moe Sihota. I lean towards NDP or true Liberal, not BC Liberal, policies but I do not agree with Moe Sihota being involved. He sours the mix and I am unsure if there is enough push against him to satisfy myself and a lot of other people. Adrian Dix I would give a second chance to but Moe burned that bridge a long, long time ago.

  • MichaelT

    23 weeks ago

    yeah I am now looking for another party

    Well I have to say my friend Adrian Dix though I do support you and feel you would be a good premiere, I cannot support the BC NDP anymore due to the denigration of my gender.

    I can't support a party that feels my gender is a problem ipso facto.

    As a white male I do fit in the under-represented category not for that biological, innate, unalterable fact, but because of life experiences.

    But still even if I could eek in there, this policy is simply not acceptable for any man with a brain or political ambition. It's the instalment of a matriarchy, men are bad and oh look we are right back in the middle-ages where all men were sinners and the only solution is mother (church).

    Well Mr. Dix as someone who was emotionally, financially, educationally and sexually abused by his own mother I can assure you the idea that women are better than men is simply outrageous.

    Insanity. It squelches all male voices. It kills us politically. It elects The BC Liberals. Period.

    You force us to condemn you simply because of the hatred your party expresses for men who are simply born that way. Not a choice, like the one your party made in condemning me and others. A choice to hate us.

    The same choice James made that kept the Libs in office.

    Where do I go now, what a question to face to be forced to face..........

  • wiley

    23 weeks ago

    2013

    By election time the collapse of civilization's planetary ponzi scheme will be all to self evident, so the voters will be choosing guns or butter. By that I mean a province that lives in fear, or lives within it's means. Not only are we never going back to the frivolous 90's, it's going to take some considerable effort not to go back to the '30's.

  • Skywalker

    23 weeks ago

    Adrian Dix will inherit a financial mess...

    ...just like Harcourt did in 1991. He will spend all his time trying to please everyone including the business sector, just like Harcourt did. The media will crap all over him for not cleaning up the mess left by Christy, just like they did Harcourt. All the others will crap all over the NDP because they can't do everything they want because there is no money to shift when you are running deficit budgets. Same as with Harcourt. The media will give Dix a honeymoon until his first budget not like with Campbell and Christy which still have a honeymoon period with the media.

    I will agree with Michael T. The gender thingy is a stupid idea based on the false notion that all these years women have been excluded by the party constitution from any involvement. That is utterly false as anyone who has participated knows. It would turn me off if a good person was not able to run for the candidacy because of gender. I just wouldn't vote period.

  • MichaelT

    23 weeks ago

    thanks Skywalker

    I kinda feel a little lonely at times with these things.

    and I did not vote in the last election I regret to say exactly as you wrote. My riding, Fairview went to the Libs after being NDP.

  • Fiat lux

    23 weeks ago

    Selection by gender is

    Selection by gender is definitely a stupid dictatorial policy, against all forms of democracy.

    As a lifelong fighter and supporter of women's rights and equality, married for 60 years, 2 daughters, 4 granddaughters 1 great granddaughter, I have to admit that the idea must have originated with the traditional prejudice against women and too many stupid males in politics, but that's something that can only be cured by the education and logical promotion of women and not by any gender based enforcement that backfires very badly.

    Ed Deak.

  • Skywalker

    23 weeks ago

    And another thing.

    "he party had gone too far in the 1990s under premiers Mike Harcourt and Glen Clark when it introduced hundreds of new acts -- "too much legislation" he said."

    What a crock of bull. It is time to stop dumping on the folks who worked hard in the 90's. The Harcourt government inherited a deficit of $2.5 Billion not a surplus like the liberals. Harcourt still did not balance the budget on the backs of the poor as business wanted him to do. It took time and that cost him and Glen Clark support. The media hounding both out of office. Remember what they called Harcourt?

    Every NDP government has inherited a deficit whether it is financial or social. They take over after years of neglect in some sectors that are not the concern of right-wing governments. To crap on fore bearers because they "did too much" is repeating the same bullshit mantra that the MSM pundits have been feeding us for years.

    So my message to Dix and Tieleman is, stop dumping on the people who worked for the party to get elected in the 90's. Trampling over their political carcasses isn't going to help you with those that count. They worked for years, long before you, for the cause. Make it on your own merits and don't fuel the myths of the 90's. That is a damn good way to turn off loyal supporters.

  • Cynic

    23 weeks ago

    It's futile to pin our hopes

    It's futile to pin our hopes on the ndp, led by Dix or whomever. If Dix was a leader genuinely concerned about the economy he would contribute to the debate by asking, why is there so much debt? How can all governments be in such lousy financial positions? And he would say that his government would petition and demand that the federal government provide interest-free funding to all provinces by having the Bank of Canada be the sole purchaser of their bonds. Now that would be leadership.

    Without money reform nothing will change because nothing _can change under the present tyranny. And the situation is not only worsening, it's darkening.

  • shepsil

    23 weeks ago

    Moe Sihota, a true Social Democrat

    Those attacking Moe with baseless criticisms only have their own racism and bigoted minds to fall back on.

  • OccupyDix

    23 weeks ago

    Moe Sihota needs to have a word with Adrian Dix...

    See Adrian Dix gave unqualified, total support to the Occupy movement: http://youtu.be/pWZBO12PE-o

    Guess what? Does that mean Adrian endorses Occupy giving hell and urine to organized labor? Does Adrian endorse cracking down on keeping public spaces public and crushing freedom of expression + media freedoms? Does Adrian endorse vandalism?

    Serious questions. It is the best gift Adrian could give to the BCLibs that quip and apparently somebody made a YouTube about it: http://youtu.be/pWZBO12PE-o

    Right then and there, Adrian blew the election. Right then and there.

  • Frank Lee

    23 weeks ago

    Dix, the ignorant thug

    ...is no longer as ignorant, or as much of a thug, as he was 10-15 years ago. But he is still Adrian Dix. He showed that in his revealingly sneaky run-up to the NDP leadership less than a year ago. His penchant for secrecy, his preference for taking people by surprise and hitting them from behind, his instinct to create un-level playing fields whereever possible, are permanently inscribed in his character and in his political style.

    OF COURSE he is "dialling it down" in the run-up to the election--he knows that is the strategic thing for him to do as long as the Liberals are unpopular.

    But his election as leader of the NDP was a Faustian bargain that many will regret. For example, he got his foot in the door in the first place, because Carole James adopted an attitude of non-interference and laissez-faire with respect to local riding nominations. There was a shocking lack of competititon and Dix waltzed into a safe riding.

    Does any body really believe that when the shoe is on the other foot Dix will not operate, either explicitly or behind the scenes, to interfere in local nominations, even in crucial or winnable ridings? Or that talented cabinet ministers will feel as free to speak their minds and show initiative as they were in Harcourt's day? How naive can you be?

    We have to start thinking about ways to get rid of this f**king a**hole--if by the grace of God, we can lose the next election, it could be a blessing in disguise, particularly if it leads to Dix's replacement by a more balanced and humane individual and true team player.

  • Stewart MacKenzie

    23 weeks ago

    Dix is learning from the past

    The biggest problem the NDP had through the nineties was not so much policy, as the increasing isolation of those running the show from both party membership and the public. As a result, many of the grassroots supporters and campaign workers who had helped elect the party twice lost any motivation to do the same in 2001. You do not lose an election by a 77 - 2 margin by being sensitive and responsive but by being arrogant and out of touch!

    Having said that, and including Adrian Dix in my list of those who were in charge of the party's direction in the 90s, and admitting I did not support Adrian for leader, I must say he has not only impressed me with his approach and style, but has given environmentally concerned party members and others good reason for hope - and reason to work hard for the party - not least by putting his leadership rivals in key positions and addressing issues they brought forward. As a result, gains in the polls have been made at the expense of the Green party, and despite the dire predictions of a year ago (hello, Frank) the party is in good shape heading towards the next election and the Libcredit party is in disarray, having rearranged the deck chairs while ignoring the leaks in their ship.

    By showing he has learned from past mistakes, both his own and those of others, he has demonstrated a potential for growth that is all too rare in politics and won over some skeptics including this one!

  • Frank Lee

    23 weeks ago

    P.S. Alive and DPL: Dix is about POWER

    His Ruthlessness is quite comfortable with having pliant backbenchers who are chosen for reasons other than talent--and for making it a bit more difficult for a Nathan Cullen or a Gregor Robertson to find a future seat in the Legislature.

  • Skywalker

    23 weeks ago

    Sorry but,

    I can't disagree more with Frank Lee and Stewart MacKenzie. Adrian was one of the few who made the James opposition look like and opposition. Most of the comments about him as a person are really describing any BC liberal we have had inflicted on us since 2001. You lose 77- 2 by the manipulation of the corporate media which controls BC political discourse like no other province. Almost everyone I discuss issues with today recognizes that they were conned.

    What you had after 2005 was a bunch of recent arrivals who had bought the MSM line along with some who were part of the 90's and these people all found it easier to dump all over the folks who were active in the 90's rather than push back at the same clowns who were peddling the same old mantra about the NDP.. The irony is that it will be these same people (the ones who didn't get what they wanted, when they wanted it) who will be snapping at Dix's arse right after he forms the government. He's being set up for it now.

  • alive

    23 weeks ago

    so?

    As it happens Frank Lee, being all about power is a nice change from James who was all about being nice!

    Nice people do not win elections!

    If in doubt follow the path of a certain Mr. Harper and you will see that ruthlessness works!

    Maybe it is time we use the same tactics?

  • Granville

    23 weeks ago

    Adrian Dix: no kerb appeal

    Sorry to say this, but Adrian Dix will never be premier of BC. He lacks the looks and has no charisma. Appearances are everything in politics, regardless of what everyone migt say. Boo-hoo...

  • Skywalker

    23 weeks ago

    I hope you are not suggesting ...

    ...that Christy Clark has kerb appeal? Maybe before she opens her mouth.

  • kootenay

    23 weeks ago

    Choices

    In simplistic terms, we've got 3 options to choose from, IMO.

    1. Support Dix and vote NDP
    He's not perfect and will screw up, but the average BC'er will likely be better off with him in charge

    2. The hell with Dix and vote Liberal
    After 10 years of deceit I don't know how posters manage to reconcile that for themselves

    3. Don't vote at all and wait for the Occupy movement to find its' momentum and force change.

    For me personally, I'll be backing Dix all the way to the ballot box and hoping the Occupy movement gains strength. I think Dix is very capable, but at this point I'd vote for the 'fence post with hair' to ensure the Liberal's demise.

    It's all about choices, none of them are perfect and never will be.

  • OccupyDix

    23 weeks ago

    Here's a choice 4 kootenay

    4. Join the BCLibs and demand change & reform from within. The Occupy Nuts are violent, Dix and the BCNDP really screwed BC last time with the PacifiCats, Carrier Lumber and sky high taxe$ that made people leave BC.

    That said, the BCLibs have to fix CLBC... clean out Christy's clique... and get back to cutting gov't waste.

  • Fiat lux

    23 weeks ago

    The PacifiCats have at least

    The PacifiCats have at least employed BC people, not bought in another country, and their cost was chickenfeed compared to the 300% increase of deficits under the "fiscally responsible BCLibs" from $39 billion to over $100. billion.

    Much of it on idiotic PPP schemes, the public has to pay for through the nose, but not accounted as debts.

    Brilliant accounting.........

    Ed Deak.

  • DPL

    23 weeks ago

    Good Lord, "OccupyDix"or

    Good Lord, "OccupyDix"or Josefk to be more accurate is back on the fast ferries. why not toalk about the convention center overrun of millions, the new roof for the old stadium( it leaks) that kept going up in price or some other BC Liberal boondoggles. By the way, the Libs sold those boats at less than scrap value to keep their friends such as JosefK onside. They are operating quite well as far as I know. Talk about the Sonia, a tub BC Ferries bought offshore and spent a bunch more to bring it up to minimum standard. The article started with a statement that Dix dials it down, so some folks won't expect the world in his first week as Premier, and he will be premier.

  • OccupyDix

    23 weeks ago

    @DPL

    I don't call dialing it down endorsing Occupy. Watch the clip: http://youtu.be/pWZBO12PE-o

    These guys don't want to create jobs, they want to socialize the economy.

    The BCLibs yeah have made errors, but just as the PacifiCats didn't fit BC only now are the Crown Corporations cutting back on wish lists.

  • igbymac

    23 weeks ago

    Cynic

    Cynic, I'll go one further and state unequivocally that it's futile to pin our hopes on Party politics, particularly under our form of governance.

  • igbymac

    23 weeks ago

    Bigger problems that Dix's indoctrinated distractions

    Frank says, "Dix, he's the smartest guy that we'll have ever had as premier", which may be true but oh, so sad.

    But here's the barn burner:

    I will add that there's always an alternative for those of you not happy with Dix, you can run your own candidates and vote for them or even yourselves. That does require more time and energy than posting to a forum however so I won't hold my breath.

    What makes you think the next progressive step is going to be at the ballot box? Here we have the indoctrinated Parties all suggesting we try to squeeze the last few drops out of the capitalist cow before it drops dead. It is complete distraction. A sideshow to reality.

    Meanwhile,

    PM Harper's controversial crime bill to build a hostel of new prisons is at this early date suggested to be $19 billion;

    and the Federal government's F-35 conytroversial fighter jets another $30 billion;

    and our shameful yet memorable G-20 hostage-styled detainment of 1000+ innocent peoples by the state under illegal laws and in flagrant contravention of civil laws;

    and with our horrific and escalating adventures abroad in illegal warfare;

    and Canada's recent signing of the $1 billion 'Beyond the Border" agreement with the USA with "Canadian business leaders praised the deal and calling it the most important agreement since the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement", and with Harper ringing the alarm bell once again saying "The key that locks the door against terrorists also opens a wider gate to cross-border trade and travel ... Canada has no friends among America's enemies .. What threatens the security and well-being of the U.S., threatens the security and well-being of Canada" but marketed to us also as a good way to stop Employment Insurance fraud: Another LINK ...

    (cont below)

  • igbymac

    23 weeks ago

    (from above)

    ...and with our American despots to the south passing s.1867 to the National Defense Authorization Act which allows indefinite detention of Americans or others without charges;

    and the USA's use of spy drones across our border and into our airspace now also spying on Americans from the sky

    ...these are just a few ways the global security state lead by the USA Empire and its toady, Canada, is tightening the noose around our necks.

    And we do what? We bicker over an obviously failed economic model, which is profoundly gamed for the very ruling few, instead of overthrowing these corporate crooks who have hi-jacked our nation. And we go vote for them, religiously for some, without thinking for a moment how that supports their crimes against us all.

  • igbymac

    23 weeks ago

    And what we all need to know, stated again and again ...

    because far too many listen to the words but never hear the message, never think they are the one's being played for the sucker.

    The men who own the corporate press are fighting a class war, seeking, even now, to defend the 1% to which they belong against its challengers. But, because they control much of the conversation, we seldom see it in these terms. Our press reframes the major issues so effectively that it often recruits its readers to mobilise against their own interests.

    http://www.monbiot.com/2011/12/12/unmasking-the-press/

    And speaking of that, consider the much beloved Sir Winston Churchill's famous quote "the best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with a voter". Like a lot of political talk, it is Orwellian doublespeak. T

    he citizenry takes it as a warning but then proceeds to do nothing about it.

    Churchill states it as a fact, a fact he and others can exploit, while he laughs at us all for being told the truth but never hearing the message.

  • Bucketbrigade

    23 weeks ago

    Except for Igbymac most of

    Except for Igbymac most of you fall right into the media trap..Quotas, gender, blah blah blah..

    The gender policy affects 2 ridings...2 fucking ridings..

    Bill Good has been groaning all day Monday about gender,and today, and tomorrow he`s bringing in Alise Mills and two other females to bash the NDP some more.

    BC Liberals are corrupt, period!

    John Les..Jane Thorthwaite..Kash Heed..Gordon Campbell..Shirley Bond/uneducated solicitor general and attorney general...Are you kidding me!

    Go ahead, vote BC Liberal...Vote John Cummins.

    Seems to me corporations became rich in the 70s and before, even at 30% or 40% tax rate, and Governments weren`t broke..

    You fools who buy the bullshit...Oh my, our population is getting old, the dreaded medical costs..

    And no country has ever had that problem, really!..What abunch of saps.. and what happens after that?..Population gets younger..Imagine that..Oh but healthcare costs are unsustainable?..really, what about after WWII..We have thousands without limbs/eyes/faces...And we had families having a basket full of kids, there was plenty of money for all.

    Iceland told the bankers to fuck off and die and their doing fine.

    Most of you jokers and clowns are controlled by media but are too stunned to realize it.

    Global economy, an excuse to make you slaves....Enjoy the shackles losers!

  • Bucketbrigade

    23 weeks ago

    Enbridge has had over 800 pipeline spills ...

    800 pipeline spills in the last decade...

    What does that have to do with this thread..

    The answer is simple.

    Enbridge have made so many messes they couldn`t clean up that they learned how to create the illusion...

    That`s what the media has done to you people, created an unreal illusion..

    Think I`m kidding?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zlnri_scklA&feature=player_embedded

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gXaYZVGw44&feature=player_embedded

  • Frank

    23 weeks ago

    A few responses

    OccupyDix said : "Adrian blew the election. Right then and there."

    You're wrong [COMMENT ASSUMING KNOWLEDGE OF ANOTHER COMMENTER'S IDENTITY REMOVED. -MODERATOR.], if you check the last major poll the NDP looks to be ahead of the Liberals and Conservatives and its lead has widened since the poll before it.

    Cynic, no provincial premier is going to tell the federal government what to do with the Bank of Canada. Its not going to happen.

    Frank Lee : "-if by the grace of God, we can lose the next election, it could be a blessing in disguise"

    The last 3 elections must have brought you a lot of joy then.

  • Frank

    23 weeks ago

    Stewart

    The NDP selected a James loyalist, so no, the sky didn't fall.

  • Vox.Pop

    23 weeks ago

    A Real Difference

    Voting for the NDP has to be more than throwing out the current bunch of crooks. The NDP has to show that they are the people's party, not the party of the top 10%. There is no point in swapping pigs at the trough unless there is going to be real change.
    First off, promise to restore taxes to the pre-Campbell rates; that should bring in an extra $1,000 million per year; then tell us how you plan to spend this extra cash.

  • anarcho

    23 weeks ago

    Not Much Hope for Change

    Here we are faced with the Triple E crisis - economy, energy and environment, and this is the best the NDP can do? Sounds to me like the party brass have drunk a lot of the neoliberal cyanide Kool Aide...

  • OccupyDix

    23 weeks ago

    Frank

    a) I am whomever you want me to be
    b) Buddy, I can think several moves ahead. BCLibs got you where we want you - far left, loony, and endorsing criminal activity

    That said to excuse cuts to CLBC and vote BCNDP or just excuse them is destroying humanity. So is using blatant profanity and bashing women as Buck has done here.

  • crh

    23 weeks ago

    igbymac

    So you think you want a revolution? Will you be leading it then?

    Some of us want to play nice and make change from within the system, not pick up arms and face it all with violence and murder as history has shown it to be.

    As far as I can see, the NDP is the only party that will be any sort of government for the people. Dictatorships are for Harper and Clark.

  • Bucketbrigade

    23 weeks ago

    Up AGT`s asshole

    That`s where you live..Dixksy chick..

    AGT beat you like a rented mule!

    And he sure did affect the landslide victory of gregor Robertson.

    Time to find a real god, not a false prophet!

  • MichaelT

    23 weeks ago

    igbymac so you hate me

    It is clear you denigrate and devalue men.

    We are not blind if it was women being denied access to political activity you would be quite up in arms.

    This is not Iran or Saudoi Arabia or even America. Newsflash: the premiere of this province is a female who won her party not from quotas.

    THIS IS 2011 CANADA. Women are most certainly not being oppressed in the BC NDP.

    Your dismissive attitude towards men and our feelings and thoughts make it clearly hate you are pushing.

    Are we not alive, do we not feel pain and joy and happiness? You treat us like we are monsters meant only for grunt work moving boxes. You are pure and evil hate.

    Acceptable to hate men simply for the fact of how we were born? No, it is not.

    The fact you are so blind to our turmoil here and have absolutely no compassion for us pretty much tells the world what the BC NDP is all about. Yeah I am a member and voted at the Convention for the leader earlier in the year. But no more unless this changes. Sure I will assist my employer support for your fetid hateful organization but outside work I will now seek your total annihilation.

    You whine about Bill Good yet do nothing to counter what he is doing - you feed into it with these hateful policies.

    WHAT MAKES YOU IMMUNE FROM REASON? What is wrong with you that you would treat us like non-persons politically? Why? WHY! WHY!???

    Why do you wanty to kill me politically? Why do you want to force me to become a female if I want to participate in politics? Why can't you see what you are doing to me a human being. You are destroying me and leaving me no choice but to fight you.

    You give succour to our collective enemies of progress and you think we will agree that men are worthless evil unworthy just because of other evils? Security for liberty is the same filthy equation but different variables.

    What is wrong with you? You just killed your party's chances for what, hatred of men? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU WHY ARE YOU DO FEEL IT IS OKAY TO KILL MEN POLITICALLY?

    WHY IS IT OKAY TO DISENFRANCHISE MEN? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?

    YOU YOU YOU PUT THIS ON THE BILL GOOD SHOW. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE. YOU.

    WHY DO YOU NEED TO HATE SOMONE TO ELEVATE YOURSELF? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?!?!

  • MichaelT

    23 weeks ago

    ..and bucketbrigade my comments are for you too

    mainly

  • MichaelT

    23 weeks ago

    [OFFENSIVE COMMENT DIRECTED AT ANOTHER COMMENTER REMOVED.-MOD]]

    yeah every time you endporse a policy liekthis you get the corporate raiding because you crossed a basic hman right line - the right to participate in Democracy, as a candidate.

    You just took away our hard fought political rights and you think some guy making more money than you trumps that basic civil liberty in importance?

    NO that is a fantasy. We WILL VOTE THE LIBS OR THE CONS ORTHE GREENS Because of your actions. IUT ISYOU WHO KEEP THESE BAD POLICIES IN PLACE.

    you force us out as this policy truthfiully is all about - shovin out male voices and only allowing females-who-hate-men to run things.

    Your policies push us into their arms. You can cry all you want about not voting for our interests economically but there is no economy without civil liberties worth fighting for.

    WHY CAN YOU NOT SEE THE HURT YOU ARE CAUSING HERE?

  • Bucketbrigade

    23 weeks ago

    Crusty Clark isn`t premier

    She wasn`t elected, she has no mandate.

    The 2009 election was based on fraud!

    Crusty Clark stated in her own words in the BC LIBERAL leadership campaign that she needed a mandate from the people, she stated she would call an early election..

    She lied, she waffled, she looked at the poll numbers and said no way jose.

    She is not premier.

    Vote for anyone you want Mikey..

    You will receive no quarter from me.

    The policy was voted on and passed, that`s a democracy, just like we voted out the HST, it`s called Democracy.

    You like dictatorship, vote for the BC Liberals.

    Follow the lead of your friend OccupyDix.

    I chose John Horgan, Dix won, you don`t hear me crying like a baby with a wet diaper.

    Take a sedative, it`s not healthy yelling at the computer.

    Ha

    Good Day

  • MichaelT

    23 weeks ago

    WHY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?

  • MichaelT

    23 weeks ago

    Laugh now

    Cry later.

    Why don;t you flip that and say to a woman denied her political rights to take a sedative.

    your cold unfeeling hate and frankly stupiidity areclear to all who have hearts and minds and are not blinded by ideology.

    Dix needs to change this policy fast or no one but the haters will be part of your surely-diminishing tribe.

    [OFFENSIVE COMMENT REMOVED. -MODERATOR.]

  • MichaelT

    23 weeks ago

    fucking cowards I hate em!

    sorry trolls. I really wish The Tyee would full on and demand real names from it's commentators posted in the comments.

  • Bucketbrigade

    23 weeks ago

    I didn`t endorse any policy...

    The majority did, from what I saw of the convention there were more men there than females, they voted and that was the result.

    As for destroying your chance to engage in politics, I think the anger you have displayed on this thread ruled you out.

    Can`t keep calm under pressure.

    Joe Trasolini isn`t female?

    Provincially the NDP(In BC) have 32% female representation..

    The party wants to get to 50% female representation..

    Not an unreasonable number, no?

    The BC Liberals had a female quota too..

    Donna Barnett(idiot is being kind)

    Magaret Mcdiarmid(stunned)

    Mary Mcneil(talented and ultra rich doctor, but not very astute or politically savvy)

    Stephanie Cadiex(useless taperecorder)

    There were more qualified men in each of those ridings, they were chosen because they were female.

    People are so easily manipulated.

    Like I said, the BC Liberals had a quota too

    Only it was a secret quota, at least the NDP are up front about it.

  • Bucketbrigade

    23 weeks ago

    I didn`t call you names

    Is Mikey a bad name?

    You can call me Bucky..Oh, nevermind, you called me..

    "bucketbrain...Coward...Troll..Dictator...and Corporate enabler"

    I like Mikey, he eats his cereal.

    That was a joke.

    Personally I would prefer no policies, however, without policies there would be ..

    No female police officers and no female firefighters and no females in the armed services, that`s a fact, it`s a genetic thing, it has to do with speed, strength and size.

    Good Day

  • Bucketbrigade

    23 weeks ago

    One more thing

    "thanks Skywalker

    I kinda feel a little lonely at times with these things.

    and I did not vote in the last election I regret to say exactly as you wrote. My riding, Fairview went to the Libs after being NDP."

    Just what the party needed, someone who didn`t vote at all...Hmmm

    I believe that disqualifies you from criticism.

    Those who don`t vote can`t bitch about the results

  • igbymac

    23 weeks ago

    real names you say?

    MichaelT: fucking cowards I hate em!

    sorry trolls. I really wish The Tyee would full on and demand real names from it's commentators posted in the comments.

    After reading your last few diatribes, I am thinking a breathalyzer might be more appropriate.
    ---------
    fyi, google MichaelT -- 11.5 million returns

  • Bucketbrigade

    23 weeks ago

    My google page..

    My google has 2 billion 490 million possibilities for Michael T

    Ah, what`s a few billion between friends.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYLsyNBnE5M

  • cboo44

    23 weeks ago

    Morons

    Nothing like profanity to add that "special" emphasis to your point of view. And it adds such credibility to your rant, also. And it proves that you have that true intellectual quality. Makes you appear better looking also. Increases testosterone levels in the authors.

  • OccupyDix

    23 weeks ago

    @cboo44

    Thank you.

  • DPL

    23 weeks ago

    So we are back to the part

    So we are back to the part where folks here simply trash each other and stop discussing the story line. Dix will be the next BC Premier, Clark may well go back to talk radio and take her outreach pal with her, 130 thousand a year but no job description. The Tyee knows who the scribes here actually are.

  • Frank

    23 weeks ago

    OccupyDix

    [ATTEMPTING TO IDENTIFY A FELLOW COMMENTER IS CONSIDERED A SMEAR AND WILL BE REMOVED AS THIS ONE WAS. -MODERATOR.] : "b) Buddy, I can think several moves ahead. BCLibs got you where we want you - far left, loony, and endorsing criminal activity"

    Seriously? You're way behind in the polls and the Conservatives are eating into the support you have and yet you want to seriously claim the Libs have the NDP right where they want them? By all means put on a brave face, but unless you can back it up with something substantial it means squat and your rant will be ignored.

    As for "endorsing cvriminal activity" (sic). The NDP and most voters support the Occupy movement's reason to be. What most voters (including me) don't support is goal-less camping. So if you think that the Libs are going to get far attacking a movement that most people support you're going to be as disappointed as Suzanne Anton.

    [AND HERE.]: "That said to excuse cuts to CLBC and vote BCNDP or just excuse them is destroying humanity."

    It was the Liberals that made cuts to the CLBC. And it was the Liberals that lied about it. The Liberals are bullies, beating up on the most unfortunate in our society.

  • OccupyDix

    23 weeks ago

    A vote for the BCNDP

    Is a vote for Occupy. As it stands now.

    A vote for Occupy is...

    A vote for bullying public servants.

    A vote for violence on police.

    A vote for harassing both professional & citizen journalism.

    Just watch http://youtu.be/pWZBO12PE-o for yourself.

  • Frank

    23 weeks ago

    OccupyDix

    I doubt anybody has any reason to want to watch your silly youtube videos what with fighter jets attacking MLAs.

    Angus Reid public opinion poll conducted from October 31 to November 1, sampling 803 people has the following voter intentions:

    BC NDP – 40%
    BC Liberal – 31%
    BC Conservatives – 18%
    BC Greens – 8%
    Other – 3%

  • Frank

    23 weeks ago

    Seat projection at bc2013.com

    BC NDP – 60 seats
    BC Liberals – 16 seats
    BC Conservatives – 7 seats
    BC Greens – 0 seats

    Independents – 2 seats (Vicki Huntington, Delta South; Bob Simpson, Cariboo North assuming the NDP does not run a candidate) (3%)

  • Bucketbrigade

    23 weeks ago

    More devastaing BC :Liberal poll results

    "Good government NGO Integrity BC released a poll last week about BC politics. It was not good for the government of non-elected Premier Christy (not Christine) Clark.

    Integrity BC are the folks who sponsored last week’s Georgia Straight ad featuring our premier in a Nascar jacket plastered with corporate logos representing big money donations to the BC Liberal Party. And they’re promoting a group of reforms like banning corporate and union political donations as a way of cleaning up the kind of government Clark represents.

    Back to the poll. Conducted by Oraclepoll Research and barely noted in the media, it had the NDP leading the BC Liberals by 19 points, 44 to 25. Nineteen points! It seems a mite generous to the NDP and harsh on the Liberals (I’ve heard anywhere from 11% to 14% this fall). But it doesn’t seem out of the question. If true, Integrity’s poll mirrors the polling seen in 1991, right before the demise of the Social Credit party.

    What’s behind such crazy numbers? There’s the usual run of issues – the economy, health care and jobs, but I don’t think ‘the issues’ explain the huge rejection of the BC Liberals. Behind the issues the poll seems to suggest there is a growing wave of contempt for the government. Voters have just stopped listening to them."

    http://therealstory.ca/2011-12-04/bc-liberals/another-day-another-unreported-poll

  • Skywalker

    23 weeks ago

    Frank

    Right on!

  • Frank

    23 weeks ago

    Moderator

    "ATTEMPTING TO IDENTIFY A FELLOW COMMENTER IS CONSIDERED A SMEAR AND WILL BE REMOVED AS THIS ONE WAS. -MODERATOR"

    In the past the commentator with many different names because I assume they either keep forgetting their password or you banned them has agreed he was the same commentator as the one posting under the name "Josef K" on Sean Holman's Public Eye and calling CKNW using that name.

    So I'm not "outing" anybody, I'm simply calling him what he agreed was his name before he decided to disassociate himself from it.

    It would be like if I changed my name to "The Phantom" but didn't want anyone to call me Frank anymore. Would someone still calling me Frank be considered to be "outing" someone?

    No offence but I fail to see how that dog can hunt.

  • happy

    23 weeks ago

    The year is 2017.....

    An election is in the air. The two main opponents, Vision BC led by charismatic Gregor Robertson is facing off against the BC First party led by Diane Watts. Although the NDP is presently in power no one gives them a chance, as following their victory in 2013 they immediately began imploding with internal squabbles amongst their various factions. Adrian Dix is long gone, ousted in a coup instigated by Jenny Kwan as he was perceived to be “not tough enough” by the hard liners who were demanding more “direct action” against all private business in the province.
    The BC Liberals folded after the split vote 2013 election and were reborn under BC First without skipping hardly a beat. The NDP rebranded itself as the New Cope Party, the NCP. Hardly anyone notices or cares. Christy Clark resurfaced on Global TV where she hosts a Saturday morning show on soccer moms. Word has it Adrian is writing a book that will “tell all” and he has hired Mike Harcourt as an adviser.
    The election is a wipe out as the entire province, with the exception of the city of Vancouver goes for BC First as Vision BC is perceived to be too “elitist” and Vancouver-centric with their election platform of installing bike lanes on all provincial highways “from Sparwood to Atlin” is the call. Watts immediately begins planning for the main BC First campaign promise, to move the capital from Victoria to Surrey. Newton is chosen as the preferred location, with plans for a future Skytrain line. The local muffler and autobody shops who are being kicked out object but sacrifices must be made for the greater good.
    And life goes on in Beautiful BC.

  • Skywalker

    23 weeks ago

    I think that next ...

    ...I should post my hallucinations for all to read. I mean why not?

  • Frank Lee

    23 weeks ago

    The Top Three Reason to (NOT) support Adrian Dix

    Consider all of the best arguments for choosing Dix currently being mooted within the NDP, and you'll realize that they each contain the seeds of their own rebuttal:

    1. He was probably the NDP's most effective Opposition Critic between 2005 and 2009.
    Oh sure he was. But why did he stand out? Because all but 2 or 3 members of the NDP caucus were complete political novices who probably couldn't have found their way to the washrooms of the Legislature, and who were unaccustomed to the politics of television. And why was that ? Because the NDP had been all but wiped out in 2001, reduced to just 2 seats. And why was that? Because of the way that Clark-Dix-Gunton ran the premier's office, in particular the fast ferry and casino gate scandals. In other words, Dix was the beneficiary of his own misdeeds. Clark and Dix had built their own safe bunker in Vancouver-Kingsway, but others were not nearly so safe from the holocaust that they unleashed.

    2. Dix is better at getting on television and at using the media to articulate the NDP's position.

    Oh sure he is. But why is he so media-savvy? It is because of all of those years of practice as Glen Clark's right-hand man, making sure that every action of the government was vetted for the six o clock news. The result was stultifying for the most talented cabinet ministers during the Clark years, and ultimately contributed to some bad public policies being made. Both Corky Evans and Paul Ramsay have opined that the Harcourt government was better than the Clark government, largely for that very reason.

    3. Dix did a great job on the Children and Families child death scandal.
    Oh sure he did. Did you see how he anticipated every information-concealing and accountability-avoiding move the government made? But why did he display such uncanny clairvoyance? Because for three years as Glen Clark's principal secretary he had been the NDP point man for information control and accountability avoidance. "It takes a thief to catch a thief" is a great-sounding rationale for appointing an oppostion critic or hiring a political advisor; but it is a lousy reason for choosing a premier.

  • Skywalker

    23 weeks ago

    OK Frank Lee, Now how does Christy stack up?

    For all her experience, she is still like a deer caught in the headlights. She rambles on like she is fond of the sound of her own voice and rarely says anything relevant. She was a big part of Gordon Campbell's deceit and lies not to mention the cover up on BC Rail. So we should support who exactly?

  • G West

    23 weeks ago

    Well - pretty simple really

    If folks like Frank Lee don't like Dix I can't think of anything better to support the idea that he's the best person for the job of running this province - especially in comparison with the current unelected occupier of the Premier's chair.

    Bring it on! The fact one's enemies aren't lining up to support the NDP's current leader is a good thing.

  • happy

    23 weeks ago

    Unelected premier you say

    Dan Miller Feb 25 1999 - Feb 24 2000
    Ujjal Dosanjh Feb 25 2000 - June 2001

    Looks like Christy's got a way to go yet to beat the record.

  • happy

    23 weeks ago

    Make that

    Miller AUG 25 1999 -

    (I need a proof reader)

  • G West

    23 weeks ago

    You're right of course happy

    But both those guys actually had seats in the house AND the support of their caucus

    There IS a difference...furthermore, neither of them lasted very long, did they?

  • Bucketbrigade

    23 weeks ago

    Oh Happy

    Don`t quit your day job..

    Save the story telling for those with a clever imagination.

    Don`t forget Rita P..

    Your point being?

    I never called any of those you named premier..EVER.

    As for Dan Millar, you BC Liberalites love that guy.

    He does make a mean backyard chilly.

    Cheers

  • happy

    23 weeks ago

    Well West

    Christy has a seat. I don't see a Gang of 13 trying publically to oust her. And let us not forget....if Gordo hadn't shortened the election interval to four years from five....

  • G West

    23 weeks ago

    You missed the point my friend

    She DIDN'T have a seat when she convinced a bunch of 'Liberals' on the internet to make her premier - therefore, I reiterate, "unelected".

    You know my views about what happened to Carole James, but, really (although from her performance I can hardly believe I'm saying this) there is just a small difference between Ms Clark and the leader of the Opposition.

  • igbymac

    23 weeks ago

    crh

    Revolution does not necessarily entail bloodshed, and it certainly doesn't meaning lining up with Party 'Leaders' like Dix et al who want to tweak capitalism. Capitalism is, in fact, feeding upon itself and soon it, too, will no longer exist.

    People need to operate outside of the state powers and in defiance of its coercive forces; we need to stop fueling its legitimacy in small and large ways. That's the revolution I am talking about.

    Here are three structural fixes suggested, all tied to monopolistic control which allow the plutocrats to operate the authoritarian, corporatist governance we are all running up against:

    1. socialize the ownership of monopolies,

    2. de-financialize the management of the economy, i.e.,governed by a democratic marketplace, not Wall Street,

    3. de-globalize international relations.

    (cont)

  • igbymac

    23 weeks ago

    cont from above

    Revolution does not necessarily entail bloodshed, and it certainly doesn't meaning lining up with Party 'Leaders' like Dix et al who want to keep tweak capitalism. Capitalism is, in fact, feeding upon itself and soon it too will no longer exist.

    People need to operate outside of the state powers and in defiance of its coercive forces; we need to stop fueling its legitimacy in small and large ways. That's the revolution I am talking about.

    Here are three structural fixes suggested, all tied to monopolistic control which allow the plutocrats to operate the authoritarian, corporatist governance we are all running up against:

    1. socialize the ownership of monopolies,

    2. de-financialize the management of the economy, i.e.,governed by a democratic marketplace, not Wall Street,

    3. de-globalize international relations.

    We are in a crucial period in history. The only legitimacy of capitalism is to have created the conditions for passing on to socialism, understood as a higher stage of civilization. Capitalism is now an obsolete system, its continuation leading only to barbarism. No other capitalism is possible. The outcome of a clash of civilizations is, as always, uncertain. Either the radical left will succeed through the audacity of its initiatives to make revolutionary advances, or the counter-revolution will win. There is no effective compromise between these two responses to the challenge.

    All the strategies of the non-radical left are in fact non-strategies, they are merely day-to-day adjustments to the vicissitudes of the imploding system. And if the powers that be want, like le Guépard, to ‘change everything so that nothing changes,’ the candidates of the left believe it is possible to ‘change life without touching the power of monopolies’! The non-radical left will not stop the triumph of capitalist barbarism. They have already lost the battle for lack of wanting to take it on.

  • happy

    23 weeks ago

    Bucket

    "Don`t quit your day job.."

    I work more nights than days. Sucks.

    "Save the story telling for those with a clever imagination"

    Like you?

    "Don`t forget Rita P.."

    I DID forget. Followed that Vander Zalm dude now that you mention it after his....indiscretion.

    "Your point being?"

    Quite obvious I think

    "I never called any of those you named premier..EVER"

    I admire your stand.

    "As for Dan Millar, you BC Liberalites love that guy."

    I did like him for a dipper. As well as Harcourt and Corky. Plain speakers, tell it like it is.

    "He does make a mean backyard chilly"

    Excellent.

    Cheers to you!

  • igbymac

    23 weeks ago

    The above was from an article

    The above was from an article in The Bullet, but after a half-dozen different attempts to post this over the last 12 hours or so, this is the best I can do to get the cite up.

    One might also get some ideas from the Avi Lewis and Naomi Klein movie, The Take.

  • Bucketbrigade

    23 weeks ago

    Merry Christmas Happy

    You too G West, Frank.

    That squeezing you are about to feel is an internet group hug.

    Good Day

  • elmer kabush

    23 weeks ago

    re Dix

    A lot can be said about law and order issues but Dix has to deal
    with gang drug lords in Vancouver. I don't want to see Beautiful BC
    turn into new burial grounds and street shootings which only
    legitimate gang violence by not stopping it.

  • Tieleman

    23 weeks ago

    Bill Tieleman on BC Rail inquiry

    Even on holiday I have to comment on sone of these posts:

    Dec 28, 2010 - "VICTORIA – The New Democrats are reiterating their call for a public inquiry on the seventh anniversary of the unprecedented police raid on the legislature, a day when the public is not any closer to getting questions about what really happened with the B.C. Rail corruption scandal."

    Why do you expect Adrian Dix to talk BC Rail every time he takes a stage?

    No one has written more or covered longer the Basi-Virk/BC Legislature Raid case - and I am sure an inquiry will happen as repeatedly promised.

    As to other naysayers, read the polls, watch the game, follow the resignations, wait for the by-elections. Dix hasn't won the election - my point is he's doing the things needed to be in position to do so.

  • igbymac

    23 weeks ago

    Tieleman asks:

    "Why do you expect Adrian Dix to talk BC Rail every time he takes a stage?"

    Because it was an epic coup by the state against democracy and every citizen of the province.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.