Opinion

The Hole in the Middle: Gambling, Families and Politicians

Financial wreckage caused by gambling addicts hurts spouses, kids. Why does our government bet on more sad losers?

By Fiona Tinwei Lam, 5 May 2011, TheTyee.ca

Falling playing cards

Hidden cards: Relatives kept secret from me a gambling tragedy.

Related

Over the last two months, Vancouver City Council held one of the longest public hearings in its history over the proposal by Las Vegas-based Paragon Gaming Inc. to relocate the existing Edgewater casino at the Plaza of Nations to a new $500 million, 800,000 square foot complex on provincial land next to BC Place stadium, tripling the existing number of slot machines to 1,500 and doubling the number of tables to 150.

On April 19, City Council voted unanimously to approve the relocation, but not the expansion, placing a moratorium on applications to expand gambling in Vancouver until the provincial government and the BC Lottery Corporation undertake a "comprehensive public consultation" on the issue.

During the course of the three nights and two days that Council heard submissions, the BC Lottery Commission and BC Pavilion Corporation emphasizd the economic benefits of building the biggest casino in Western Canada here and the economic harm if current Edgewater casino workers were to lose their jobs, while downplaying or dismissing the concerns raised by top health officials and experts in the field of problem gambling.

As I read the news reports, my mind kept returning to an afternoon 15 years ago at the annual Ottawa Food and Wine Show. The local casino's exhibit had an eye-catching dessert on offer, and I joined a group of several people milling about the display. One of the casino staff immediately approached me, a distinct gleam in her eye. Soon, her male colleague joined her to chat me up for several minutes. Besides handing me a brochure about the casino and extolling the wonders of its facilities, they gave me a pack of the casino's cancelled cards that had a hole punched through the middle. Nonplussed by the attention, I looked around -- no one else was receiving special treatment.

I soon discarded the brochure, but had no idea what to do with those cards, not having played cards since elementary school. There was no sudden desire to play Go Fish or Crazy Eights again, let alone learn how to play poker. I chuckled at the possibility that they'd assumed I was culturally pre-disposed to gambling, being the only Asian-Canadian in the vicinity at the time. I had grown up hearing my mother's disdain over mah jong ("A waste of time!") or any other games that involved betting. Neither of my parents had ever shown any interest in gambling. But somehow, I remained haunted by that deck of cards, long after I had given it away.

Family losses

Years later, I had the opportunity to talk to some of my mothers' younger siblings who had come from out of town for her funeral. I was surprised to hear that they often went hungry when they were growing up. "Your mother was away at boarding school, but we were left at home. Sometimes we only got one egg to share between us at dinner! One egg!" said one of her sisters. Her brother also talked about ongoing malnutrition as a youngster. The lack of food hadn't made sense to them at first, since their mother had been one of four concurrent widows of an established businessman. The other three widows had been financially secure. But then the secret came out. My maternal grandmother had most likely gambled their food money away. "They probably made a lonely widow feel important, an honoured guest," my uncle conjectured.

The conversation made me recall those news stories about kids left unattended in cars for hours while their parents gambled. A few years ago, the CBC obtained documents from the BC Lottery Corporation through an Access to Information request, that showed there were 23 cases of children abandoned at B.C. casino parking lots between Nov. 2002 and Sept. 2004, on average about one child a month. A few years ago in Calgary, there was a report of a lightly dressed 21-month-old toddler who was left in a car in Calgary's Silver Dollar Casino parking lot for six hours at night in minus eight degree weather while his father gambled. The father had covered the car windows with blankets so that casino security wouldn't see the child inside, but a casino patron had called for help when he heard the crying. Even when staff paged the father in the casino, he refused to come forward. Firefighters came to free the child, and the father was arrested by police.

Blind to addiction

It would seem that neither parental obligations nor even bodily needs can motivate problem gamblers to leave their chairs. Casino staff surveyed for a study by University of Victoria's Centre for Addiction Research reported regularly spotting patrons who wore adult diapers in order to avoid leaving their slot machines, as well as finding large quantities of discarded adult diapers in casino bathrooms. Some of my friends back in town from a motorcycle trip in the Nevada desert told me of their first surreal morning at a hotel complex just outside Las Vegas, how they awoke to find about about 30 bleary-eyed adults playing the slot machines at 6 or 7 a.m. and drinking beer for breakfast.

Even those who are self-aware enough to acknowledge they have a problem and sign up for the BCLC's self-exclusion program (identifying themselves as problem gamblers so that they will be kept out of casinos) may still have immense difficulty staying away due to the powerful hold of their addiction. The program has been ineffectively enforced, as highlighted in a recent lawsuit launched by four problem gamblers against the BCLC and local casinos. The plaintiffs each signed up for the self-exclusion program, yet casino staff never prevented them from entering or playing in local casinos. Two of the four plaintiffs eventually attempted suicide when the program failed to work. Although the BCLC has recently taken some measures to improve facial recognition software, this falls seriously short of the steps taken in other jurisdictions that require the presentation of identification cards (e.g. Saskatchewan, The Netherlands) or the use of electronic player-cards with daily and monthly limits in place of cash (e.g. Norway, Sweden, New Zealand).

It is likely that the BCLC and the casinos named in the lawsuits will settle out of court, as has happened with similar casino liability cases in Ontario, in order to prevent precedent-setting judgements akin to the landmark court cases regarding bar owners' liability and duty of care when serving alcohol. But it is clear that both the government and casinos should take more active and effective steps to prevent the harm caused to problem gamblers and their families.

Bartenders are legally required to stop serving intoxicated patrons. Drunk drivers are legally prohibited from driving. With alcohol, there are also physiological limits as to how much any individual can consume at one time in one day. But problem gamblers can lose more than just the family grocery money in one night -- it could be the amount of the next rent or mortgage payment, a child's college fund, or a retirement nest egg. They risk losing jobs, friends, families, homes.

I thought again about that hole punched neatly in the middle of the deck of used cards given to me by the Ottawa casino, how it was a symbol of more than just money being thrown down a bottomless hole.

Government heavy into the action

A recent BC Medical Association study entitled "Stepping Forward: Improving Addiction Care in British Columbia," indicated that almost one in 10 people in the province, or about 400,000 people, suffer from some form of addiction, excluding smoking. Of that number, 128,000 British Columbians have a "moderate gambling problem," and 31,000 have a "severe gambling problem." Provincial statistics show that the numbers have doubled from 0.4 per cent of the population in 2002 to 0.9 per cent in 2007.

The B.C. government sponsored online gambling site, PlayNow, with its 24-hour availability in the home or office, increases the likelihood of greater revenues for provincial coffers while simultaneously increasing the risk of causing or exacerbating the serious addiction of its citizens. Experts estimate that 41 per cent of provincial gaming revenues comes from problem gamblers.

Retired Vancouver police officer, Bob Cooper, who had a beat in Chinatown and later worked in the Asian Organized Crime Section and the Homicide Squad, wrote to City Council: "I've seen the worst side of gambling and its effects on individuals and society in general including murders, suicides, extortions and a lot more. In one of those cases that you never forget, a man lost hundreds of thousands of dollars over 24 hours in a Burnaby casino. He went home, murdered his wife and two small children, spread gasoline around his East Vancouver house then struck a match blowing the house off its foundations and killing himself in the process. Once you've walked into a scene like that you tend to view those BC Lottery ads showing smiling people having a wonderful time at the Blackjack tables just a little bit differently than most people."

Cooper also referred to the warning contained in the 2009 report of the RCMP's Integrated Gaming Enforcement team about the "extreme vulnerability" of the gaming industry to money-laundering, loan sharking and infiltration by criminal elements. One month later, the team was disbanded by Solicitor General Rich Coleman (also responsible for gaming in the province) irreparably hampering the adequate monitoring and policing of casinos. Last year, FINTRAC (Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada) fined the BC Lottery Corporation with $670,000 in penalties for more than 1,020 violations under the federal Proceeds of Crime Act for not reporting large or suspicious transactions of $10,000 or more. It was the first time a gambling commission had ever been penalized.

Interestingly, as other commentators have noted, the provincial government's sudden and dramatic increase in the weekly limit for the provincial online gambling site from $120 to $9,999 last year was just under the $10,000 requirement for filing a report under the legislation.

Hungry for the money

Petty crime apparently occurs in casinos as well. Constable Nick Sharma, an RCMP officer and member of the Combined Forces Special Enforcement Unit (the gang squad) was recently charged with theft at River Rock Casino. While off-duty, he allegedly cashed a $400 cash ticket left behind by another patron in one of the slot machines.

The hearings at Vancouver City Council over the Paragon Gaming expansion proposal may be over. But fundamental concerns remain about both the provincial government's troubling ties with the gambling lobby and its reliance on gambling revenue. The BCLC provided $1.079 billion to B.C. in the 2009-2010 fiscal year, of which three quarters came from casinos. B.C. is only second to Quebec in terms of the proportion of provincial revenue derived from gambling. It is hard to imagine any government, whatever its political stripe, giving that up.

Premier Christy Clark recently announced that over 2,000 B.C. non-profits would receive an immediate $15 million in community gaming grants. "We're putting families first by providing more funding for programs that support healthier children, stronger families and more vibrant communities," she stated in a news release. A quarter of the 2,000 charities will be restored to prior funding levels, after having had their budgets slashed when the province drastically reduced gambling grants to non-profits from $156 million in 2008-2009 to $112 million in 2009-2010.

But just like that casino's deck of cancelled cards, the positive announcement seemed to have a gaping hole in the middle: the knowledge that a significant proportion of those grants geared to benefit individuals and families in our community originates in the desperation, misery and impoverishment of others. This key time leading up to the provincial election offers voters an excellent opportunity to question our incumbent and prospective political representatives on this issue to determine whether they have the courage to take a stand.  [Tyee]

14  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • SharingIsGood

    1 year ago

    Thank you, Fiona

    I really like this piece. It is a story that should be on the front page with a more deeply placed pullout section in the papers; it should also be in the first 10 minutes of the nightly news.

    Everything about state sanctioned and owned gambling is wrong. The odds are always in the house's favour.

  • oldisland

    1 year ago

    Government was warned

    Yes, thank you Fiona. I experienced a spouse who gambled everything we had when he was working in Nevada. I drove all the way from California to Nevada, went into his motel room, found his bank card and cut it up. I had to keep a second bank account from him so that we could pay our bills. When I moved back to BC years later I was shocked to see the BC government consider getting into the gaming industry. I spoke to the minister involved, as others did. The social impact is devastating, and worsens with a poor economy.

  • sgarossino

    1 year ago

    Gambling expansion

    Thank you Fiona, for an excellent summary piece.

    I would just like to alert the Tyee and readers that we at Vancouver Not Vegas have been advised by Sgt Bob Cooper that his recollection about the murder suicide in Vancouver was partly erroneous. Two grandparents in the home at the time of the incident were able to save the two children involved.

    More recently, a murder suicide at a Richmond hotel in January was found to be linked to catastrophic losses at the River Rock Casino. I have spoken with a former floor manager at the River Rock who was familiar with the couple involved, and he advised that no one at the casino saw this coming or had realized they were getting into trouble.

    I understand that they, like many addicts, gambled at the high-roller table. This is the area most served by loan-sharks, as the use of a loan shark is actually considered a status relationship. Loan sharks are able to counsel their "clients" aka victims in embezzlement, fraud, and other techniques to obtain money to cover debts.

  • Conductor274

    1 year ago

    Consumerism

    As consumers we do awful things to ourselves be it with drugs (prescription and illegal), alcohol, cigarettes, food or gambling despite warnings to the contrary. In a free and open society that practices democracy where do we draw the line between the freedom to do these things and government regulation or interference?

    Now that governments have partnered up with corporations to run the country this kind of thing will only get worse. They govern on behalf of corporations first and citizens second so the push for more gambling may have taken a set back in Vancouver but I doubt it's the last we've heard on this subject. In Vernon we recently got a new casino and in Kelowna they are building a new one as well. I'd be willing to bet that within 5 years the new casino in Vancouver gets built, especially if Christy Clark and her Conservative/Liberals win the next election.

  • Wendy Bradley

    1 year ago

    Government Ethics

    A worrisome trend: too many people involved in business and government seem to be getting more and more comfortable splitting what they deem to be ethical behaviour into pieces: "my personal ethics" vs. "my business-leader, or my government-leader" ethics. It doesn't work like that. Ethics are Ethics.

    Regarding gambling, government leaders likely take care to ensure their own family doesn't get involved with in its tangled web, while cavalierly trying to entice the rest of us to become ensnared... "for our own good" they advertise in ads depicting of all things: happily LIBERATED people. Hard to find a better definition of 'corporate spin.'

    And while I'm on 'spin', the practice of pretending only these particular provincial monies can be 'earmarked' for non-profits is simply a thinly-veiled attempt to disguise the provincial wolf in grandma's clothing.

    But, sorry to say, they've been getting away with it... non-profits desperate for money to do our society's work quickly become complicit as the government gives them no alternative if they wish to receive government funding. MALARKY. If non-profit funding is a priority (which I believe it should be), let all of us pay for it honourably and transparently through our taxes and donations.

    The issues are complicated, but clearly framing unethical behaviour for all to see is important. Many thanks for your well written article, Fiona. I hope its ripples continue to have and impact over the next good while as this issue isn't going to go away any time soon.

  • warbler

    1 year ago

    Of fools and thieves

    I echo the kudos in the first three comments. Well done, Fiona.

    I think what the Vancouver-Paragon debate teaches us is that there remain many serious, outstanding questions about expanded gambling. It also teaches us that the risks sometimes outweigh the rewards.

    I love a sunny day at Hastings Park, betting $2 every 30 minutes on a horse race, whilst sipping a beer and eating a hot dog. I love the overall experience.

    I don't love the rapid expansion of the casino variety of gaming in BC because I've been to Vegas and don't want to see the kinds of social ills seen there in BC.

    I think that in this Internet era of online this and online that, we have to be especially cautious about this issue because in the last ten years we've seen online gambling grow exponentially and, in my opinion, out of control. Slick, expensive marketing PR to sell poker as a game of skill... it seems the big online gambling companies have a finger in every sporting event these days via sponsorship. Every time I turn on a sports channel to see the ball game or highlights, it's almost always poker. If you think this isn't having an impact our youth, you are mistaken. And if you think expanded casino gaming in BC is somehow disconnected or immune from this global phenomenon, you are wrong.

    What we do have in a given political jurisdiction is the political ability to control what happens here; we have the ability to put limits on things such as gambling. Thankfully, Vancouver seems to have done this.

  • Fish-counter

    1 year ago

    RCMP officer Nick Sharma charged with theft of a $400.00 ticket

    See: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/04/19/bc-rcmp-sharma-casino-theft.html

    [REPRINTING A STORY FROM ANOTHER MEDIA OUTLET CONTRAVENES COPYRIGHT LAW. STORY REMOVED. USE LINK TO READ THE STORY. -MODERATOR.]

    Then there are the criminals that didn't get caught...

    What else do you need to know about casinos?

    1. They attract crime, even encouraging cops to steal.

    2. There is money changing hands with a minimum of record-keeping, so they become laundering sites for crime gangs.

    3. They depend on the addictions of the people who can least afford it.

    4. Eventually, even the gambling addicts stop going, so they can lose money.

    When governments get addicted to gambling, they are betting with our money.

    Casinos are about as sexy as a train wreck. They are the easy buck that every fool dreams of. Politicians who allow casinos to take hold of their communities should be forced to lose all their money there, so they can go home and tell their families they have to move out of the house and on to the street.

    Casinos are an excellent argument for the proposition that all politicans should be flogged daily, to remind them of their responsibilities.

  • zalm

    1 year ago

    great article Fiona

    Back in August 1979, a young 18-year-old out for a good time at the PNE with friends and a good paycheque in his pocket walked up to the shell game at the urging of others who were also playing. Plunked $2 down - no dice. Plunked another $2 down, won $20.

    Hey this is easy!

    Over the next half hour, gave back the original $20 and another $58 more. Some 'easy'. Some fun. Some friends.

    Yep, that was me. Only once bought so much as a lottery ticket again (having back in high school calculated odds of even small prizes coming my way.)

    Should gambling be banned? No. Should it be restricted? Yes, in the same way as bank credit is restricted. The question is how best to do it, acknowledging that recidivism is as much a part of human culture as sex. If the government won't debate the best way, the casinos will, by default, and that's not the way to govern a city, a province or a country.

  • Fish-counter

    1 year ago

    Casinos, cruise ships and conference centres

    These are the Three Stooges of Easy Pickings. With Vancouver, Victoria, Nanaimo and Campbell River all going for the cruise ship terminal, the conference centre and maybe the casino, aren't we all chasing the same rainbow?

    Twenty years of marketing experience tells me that there is something called NICHE MARKETING. That is when you go after a different market from the mainstream, recognising your strengths and weaknesses.

    The trouble with hiring MBA students from the same cookie-cutter schools is that they all provide the same cookie-cutter solutions to different cities.

    Casinos are not a creative solution, they are a destructive response, moving money from one pocket to the other without creating a damned thing except profit from poverty and crime. Sure they were a good idea in the booming Alberta economy of the 1970's, but in today's penny-pinching era of government cut-backs and streamlined organisations that are gutted of active staff, they don't work.

    We have more than enough institutiuonalised gambling with the Lotto 649. When the guvmint has to sell wet dreams on TV, you know lottery ticket sales are flagging. And that folks, is my point.

  • Nimno

    1 year ago

    Voluntary taxation by stupid people

    Gambling is voluntary taxation by very foolish people. I would like to see such fools' money at least remain in their own communities.
    Maybe the NDP would consider a policy to wean the government off this cash cow over, say, a 10 year period. Ultimately all of the revenues would then be available for local little theatres, children's sports and so on.

  • RickW

    1 year ago

    Campbell Spent & Gave Away the Treasury

    It's as simple as that. He wasted cash on capital projects, and sold off resources at firesale prices. Then he creates a deficit, using the recession as an excuse.

    The coffers are bare.

  • dorothy

    1 year ago

    Thank you

    for writing this. In the 'old days', where stakes and odds and general rules were set so you could in no way lose your house in one evening, things were decent and fun. This was when volunteer groups were taking turns holding 'casino nights'. People gambling felt gratified that their immediate and directly identifiable community efforts were being benefited. I distinctly remember that a sizable proportion of gamblers would inquire what group was 'on' that night. The presence in the picture of a bunch of wide-eyed citizens at the money-handling probably also helped keep things honest. Then Government, in this case it was an NDP government, got hold of the idea as too rich to not be 'taken under administration' and funds to be distributed on a more 'egalitarian' basis, and like all cases, where a bunch of people that are guardians with no one to guard them in turn, get their hands on money that are not particularly 'earmarked', things started going awry, first a little bit and now a whole monstrous lot.

    If the original tradition can be seen as a traditional 'liberal' state of affairs, as I think it can, then consider the monster now created, and take the distance between the two as an expression of how far removed from 'classical' liberal ideology and action the present provincial cadres of so-called liberals really are.

    I hear people think that Point Grey will oblige the pretend-premier and make her real. But, two things need to be noted here:
    Firstly, a condition for this happening for Pinocchio was that he quit lying, and secondly, the riding has had an NDP MLA before, namely Darlene Marzari. So, it can happen. It ain't over till it's over.

    THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR ANYONE IN POINT GREY TO SIT AT HOME AND NOT VOTE AND CLAIM THAT 'SHE' WOULD HAVE WON ANYWAY!

  • G West

    1 year ago

    And thank you too dorothy

    A point very well made and clearly put...there is, as you say, nothing at all 'liberal' about the current state of gambling affairs in this province.

    The people of Point Grey have it in their power to make a strong statment this week, one hopes they can find the character to do so.

  • G West

    1 year ago

    Thank you Fiona

    I should also have expressed my appreciation for your work on this article.

    Well done.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.