Typical leader of a top 100 firm makes in three days what average worker must toil a year to earn.
What's new? French view of feudal times.

-
Boss Hahn's $1 million salary twice the norm; board members set own pay 'without accountability'.
-
Five guys running Canaccord make $35 million.
-
Getting mad as hell at tycoon villains is the new buzz.
Few developments in our era of savage capitalism are so powerfully symbolic of the new feudalism than the obscene compensation paid out to the new economic elite, the CEOs of the most powerful corporations in the country. The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives's Hugh MacKenzie now reminds us yearly of this economic and social sickness by identifying exactly when the average CEO (of the 100 largest firms) has earned as much as the average worker makes in a year (this time around it was by 2:30 p.m. on Jan. 3). The average total compensation for Canada's 100 highest paid CEOs was $6,643,895 in 2009.
The social and political implications of this grotesque overcompensation are more important than the actual dollars. Socially, in terms of class, it represents the ruling elite's deliberate and conscious declaration that they will take as much money as they want out of the system simply because they can. It is the most powerful way that the elite can make clear that they have nothing in common with the rest of us. Their excess compensation has little to do with their value to a firm, their contribution or their ability.
Yet, says MacKenzie, the disparity between CEO compensation and the average worker's pay continues to grow: "In 1995, the average pay of Canada's highest paid 50 CEOs was $2.66 million, 85 times the pay of the average worker. In 2009, the average pay of the highest paid 50 CEOs had skyrocketed to 219 times the pay of the average worker." The ratio for the top 100 went from 104 times in 1998 to 155 times in 2009.
It is the modern equivalent of the power and arrogance of the robber barons of the 1920s.
The CEOs' virtual control of the public policy process, which allows for this obscene level of inequality, delivers another message: democracy, whose essence is equality, will not be allowed to mess with the natural order of things. Samuel Huntington, one of the U.S. elite's longest-running apologists, pined 35 years ago for the good old days: "Truman had been able to govern the country with the cooperation of a relatively small number of Wall Street lawyers and bankers." He pines no longer. How is it any different today, as the financial sector, supported by the resource and manufacturing giants, effectively dictates economic policy to whatever government is in power?
A rotten reward
There is nothing in this compensation pattern that benefits the corporation itself or the economy more broadly. In fact, it is clear that just the opposite is the case: compensating CEOs for the share price (over which they have almost no control) rather than profitability, stability, employee loyalty, long term growth, modernization and strong capitalization actually weakens the corporation and distorts proper management. And inequality, to which this disparity contributes, damages competiveness, innovation and productivity.
The flip side of the excess CEO compensation coin is the push by these same CEOs for so-called labour flexibility. Historically, this set of policies -- which have had the effect in Canada of flatlining real wages since 1980 -- are a reversal of Fordism, the principle established by Henry Ford whereby he paid his workers enough to allow them to purchase the cars they made. This reversal -- with workers receiving almost none of the productivity gains for two generations -- has resulted in the accumulation of unsustainable debt by Canadian (and American) working families. Government and corporate obsession with globalization and trade has allowed the domestic economy to erode. The geniuses in the economics departments and financial firms thought trade would grow forever. Now that it is faltering and they need the domestic economy to fall back on, planned inequality has critically weakened it.
It is rare for any commentators in the business press to even raise the question as to whether or not any of the CEOs receiving multiple millions in compensation are actually worth it. The pay levels, including bonuses, imply that the CEOs are geniuses, uniquely responsible for the success of their companies. But there is nothing in management theory or practice to support such a conclusion. One of the most famous management gurus, Peter Drucker, who conducted a ground-breaking study of General Motors, stated: "No institution can possibly survive if it needs geniuses or supermen to manage it. It must be organized in such a way as to be able to get along under leadership composed of average human beings. No institution has solved the problem of leadership... unless it gives the leader a sense of duty and a sense of mutual loyalty between him and his associates..."
Myth of loyalty
That "sense of mutual loyalty" has long since been tossed in the dust bin of business history. Loyalty now has to be paid for in the millions. It is not enough that the hundreds of top executives in the largest firms get huge salaries, something that was once enough to ensure loyalty. Now the financial firms that created the global meltdown claim they must pay huge bonuses to keep the loyalty of their highest paid employees. The leader who once inspired trust and loyalty of his employees has been replaced by what UBC psychologist Robert Hare calls the "sub-criminal psychopath" CEO. These men are extremely destructive to their companies and "... maneuver to have detractors fired and ruin the other peoples' careers without a hint of remorse."
Former Harvard University president Derek Bok believes that CEOs are paid their huge bonuses precisely because they are being asked to work against their better judgement as managers and human beings -- and against the best interests of their companies. But being paid huge sums to focus on the short-term returns means managers must consciously ignore the interests of their employees, the community and the long term interests of the company which is paying them.
The unconscionable compensation rates enjoyed by Canadian CEOs is part of a pattern of radical market ideology centred in the Chicago School of Economics. We are so accustomed to hearing about these gargantuan pay packages that we assume they are a global pattern. But in Japan the average CEO, by tradition, receives no more that 17 times the compensation of his lowest paid employee. In Germany (1999 figures) the ratio is twelve to one. There is no evidence that CEOs in these two countries suffer from lack of motivation or loyalty to their firms.
So long as the English speaking developed world is infected by the radical market ideology that caused the economic meltdown, the issue of CEO compensation -- and the specific issue of bonuses for bankers -- will not be dealt with. And the bankers know it. In testimony before the British House of Commons, Bob Diamond, Barclays' CEO, refused to commit to lower bonuses. Demonstrating appropriate contempt for a toothless state, he replied to tough questioning by simply declaring: "There was a period of remorse and apology; that period needs to be over."
Indeed, it is over -- until we find a way to recover democracy and the principle of equality which is at its core. ![[Tyee]](http://thetyee.cachefly.net/ui/img/ico_fishie.png)
Murray Dobbin's "State of the Nation" column runs every other Monday in The Tyee and on Rabble, and he also publishes articles on his blog.
34
Login or register to post comments
Mathieu Y
2 years ago
But seriously...
If we stop allowing these CEOs to take in exorbitant bonuses, how will they ever afford their islands, or the pundits they buy out for political gain? Not to mention their bullet proof SUV's and personal security, lest the general population ever truly understand how persistently we're being robbed.
MichaelT
2 years ago
Vote NDP please.
no matter the candidate, eh.
onthebay
2 years ago
the receipe
Take the information in this article; add it together with a populace who tend to want to continue to enjoy relatively peaceful lives (in comparison to escalating rebellion, protest, violence, etc.); and who have gotten used to politicians who frequently lie, deny, obfuscate, and manipulate; and one realizes “capitalism” will continue to get worse until something breaks.
Stewart MacKenzie
2 years ago
All NDP leadership
All NDP leadership candidates need to read this article - perhaps it will help them understand why so many members and supporters object to them kissing up to these greedy and power hungry CEOs.
You cannot be their friend and still represent the general public in any meaningful way. These people are not about to change course nor change a single policy in order to make us happy - only by giving them exactly what they want can you avoid their enmity!
Fiat lux
2 years ago
Let's not forget that the
Let's not forget that the responsibility for this and all the earth's other crime waves lies on the shoulders of our universities, where...
...the legal eagles refuse to admit that theft is a theft no matter who does it.
.... the physicists and mathematicians who can send satellites to planets and calculate events light years away, but can not comprehend that the present economic system is a fraud.
.... the medical departments who beg for donations for "cures", but refuse to admit the real causes of illnesses that existed only fractionally only a generation ago, now killing millions.
.... the economics departments....well don't even bother with them. Too stupid even to add 2 +2 = ???? "Well, it could be $9.6 withincreased GDP and productivity"
.... the science departments where the inventors of more chemicals in the air, GM foods and tar sands developments are spewed forth..
Shall we go on from department to department and ask them : What the hell is the matter with your goddamn brains, unless you're planning to join the pirate gangs by blocking out realities ?
Ed Deak.
freebear
2 years ago
Better than a pyramid scheme!
Just like governments who say they manage the economy; CEO's do what exactly?
Sooke
2 years ago
Nothing to see here folks.
So the far left, union backed Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives doesn't like it that big corporate CEO's make big bucks. If stockholders are OK with this, why should we care? Salaries for publicly listed companies are readily available. If you feel that strongly about it, don't deal with the companies that you think overcompensate their executives.
Here's a company that might meet their approval. Walmart not only DOESN'T have corporate jets, it makes its executives fly coach. But Walmart is non-union. That would never do.
Just the same tired old class warfare nonsense that the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives tries to stir up from time to time. Nothing to see here folks.
Fiat lux
2 years ago
Regardless who does it,
Regardless who does it, those salaries and the jets, or coach flights, are still coming out from the public's pockets.
Everybody's bitching about taxation, but not against the taxation by profits.
At least with taxation we can demand a little accountability and something in return in services, but not for the monies stolen from our pockets by the corporate crooks in the name of profits.
As a life long private enterpriser and business owner, I understand the need for profits, but not the present unlimited legalized theft from the public's pockets.
There was a time when these crooks would have had to pay 90% in taxes, but now they can get away with murder, tax free, and with the collectivization and destruction of real private enterprise we can see all around us.
Ed Deak.
Van Isle
2 years ago
Sooke, why did you label
Sooke, why did you label CCPA as "far" left? Now we know who pays their bills and they look at an issue differently than, let's say, the Fraser Institute. You just showed that you won't look at a message cuz you put a label on the messenger. How about if I put a label on you? "Sooke is a radical religious right-wing rabble-rouser". I really don't think you are in what I described but I hope you get my drift.
Booker
2 years ago
Example
Telus CEO, Darren Entwhistle, at the same time he was breaking the Telecommunications Workers Union, [EDITED FOR LACK OF VERIFICATION -- BOOKER, CAN YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO BACK THIS UP? THANKS. -MODERATOR.]. Tony Soprano would be envious.
And "Tony Soprano's" is what these CEOs are. They're a syndicate. They buy politicians. They lawyer up. They threaten and intimidate. They fix the game.
freebear
2 years ago
CEO's are the bullies of the Corportate World
and why we will never rid ourselves of bullying - there's money to be made (squashed under expensive Italian shoes), and I'll do what it takes to get it!
North of Hope
2 years ago
From His Highness the Aga Khan
From His Highness the Aga Khan
The Centre plans, of course, to engage expert researchers to help in its work. Those plans remind me of a “think-tank” executive who found himself floating aimlessly across the sky one day in a hot air balloon. (I suspect he was the chairman!). As he hovered above he called down to a man below, “Can you tell me where I am?” The man shouted back, giving him his longitude, latitude and altitude. “Thanks,” said the chairman, “that’s interesting, but you must be a professor!” “Why do you say that?” asked the man below. “Well,” the chairman responded, “you have given me a lot of precise information, which I’m sure is technically correct, but which is not of the faintest use to me.”
The man below replied, “And you must be an executive. “How did you know?” asked the balloonist. “Well,” said the man, “you don’t know where you are - or where you’re going. You have risen to where you are on a lot of hot air. And you expect people beneath you to solve your problems!”
Fiat lux
2 years ago
Those same executives would
Those same executives would be party cadres and politbureau members under communism, with our "conservatives" the biggest red flag wavers, and Harper the Chief of the Secret Police, with the biggest red star on his cap. I have seen those eyes under Totenkopf and red star caps and they always give me the creeps.
I've seen them all and always have to laugh when people talk rubbish about "right" and "left" wings.
There are only the predators who come out on top under every system, always licenced by religions and ideologies to commit their crimes, and their faithful victims who believe they must follow, because "it is written", and obeying will bring them "prosperity" and "everlasting life".
Ed Deak.
Reader11722
2 years ago
Corporations run it all (with the banks)
Corporations owning North America, yet another violation of our rights. Add it to the list of gov’t violations of our right:
They violate the 1st Amendment by placing protesters in cages, banning books like “America Deceived II” and censoring the internet.
They violate the 2nd Amendment by confiscating guns.
They violate the 4th and 5th Amendment by molesting airline passengers.
They violate the entire Constitution by starting undeclared wars for foreign countries.
Impeach Obama and sweep out the Congress, except Ron Paul.
(Last link of Banned Book):
http://www.iuniverse.com/Bookstore/BookDetail.aspx?BookId=SKU-000190526
RickW
2 years ago
Wasn't it just last year........
.....that the average CEO remuneration was what the average worker made in a day-and-a-half? Now it's 3 days?? Does that mean our CEOs have taken a 50% cut? Or is that we average workers are far better off than we are aware.....?? :~)
RickW
2 years ago
Reader 11722
Jack Kennedy was assassinated for something far less than what Ron Paul advocates.....
realisticman
2 years ago
Were it all began.
Anyone interested in this story will probably want to read the following story that traces the origins of modern crazy salaries.
It covers Marvin Miller and his negotiation skills learned at, among other places, the United Steelworkers Union.
It's worth a read.
https://media.scoopreprintsource.com/CondeNast/5618CN_FLIntlUnv_050310.pdf
Marysue52
2 years ago
Far Left? The CPPA? Huh?
The CCPA, to my sorrow, is not even Left. It's middle of the road. Unions haven't been left for a lot of years, as their entrenched leaders have all taken Economics and gotten themselves all brainwashed into believing that profits come out of thin air and that Growth Forever can happen on a finite planet, etc. Many Labour leaders think that high corporate salaries are none of their business! Where the hell do they think those high salaries come from, anyway? Who the hell do they think pays for CEO take home pay? Yeah, it's us, the workers/customers, our country and our environment and every living thing. It's like we are paying the CEO wages ourselves, through the tax breaks they get and the deductions they get for processing and taking our resources.
And WalMart should never meet any human being's approval, for its use of slave labour abroad.
Yeah, the class warfare is still there, but the union heads and people like Sooke are too brainwashed to see it.
samuidave (not verified)
2 years ago
To Repeat Ed Deak, verbatim ...
"I've seen them all and always have to laugh when people talk rubbish about "right" and "left" wings.
"There are only the predators who come out on top under every system, always licenced by religions and ideologies to commit their crimes, and their faithful victims who believe they must follow, because "it is written", and obeying will bring them "prosperity" and 'everlasting life'."
There are three types of Power -- the force of Armies and Police controlled by government; the force of money controlled by Banks and corporations; and the force of Propaganda controlled by the state and the media.
Power is imposed on us All from above, yet so very few of us have any control over this fact. Until we collectively grasp how we capitulate, knowingly or credulously, to serve Power against our best interests. we will remain enslaved to their desires -- which are invariably the centralization of more power.
Mikemah
2 years ago
greed
I believe that when the snott hits the fan many of these people will find themselves in dire straights to say the least and they will no longer have corrupt police, govts, and unjust laws to protect them. Every night millions of children go to bed hungry and these people care about nothing other than the hundred thousand dollar birthday party for their kids 16th birthday or bar mitzva. Or maybe a new Jag
RogerM
2 years ago
Corporate Feudalism
Karl Polanyi (The Great Transformation) observed that all systems of government finally reduce to an oligarchy whose self interest drives public policy, and these highly paid CEOs do comprise an oligarchy.
We keep forgetting that these corporate CEOs are, by and large, employees of their corporations and therefore should behave like employees, and exercise the leadership skills required to ensure the long term health of their company is always their first concern.
I also recall from my days as a student that Alfred Sloan had two rules only that guided his management philosophy:
1. The highest paid employess should be paid no more than 15 times the salary of the lowest paid employee, and
2. Vice-Presidents should be paid almost as much as the president, to avoid feuding over succession.
Yes, teamwork was the key at GM in the days of Alfred Sloan.
But, sadly, teamwork is also the key to the financial success of our current crop of CEOs.
Their boards are comprised colleagues with the same background, training and outlook as the CEOs whose salary they are deciding.
No wonder things are the way they are. For our capitalist system to survive and flourish, there need to be groundrules.
There is much evidence now at hand to prove that a self-regulated market system will not prevent unsustainable excesses occurring without financial collapse being the outcome.
The question we all need to ask ourselves is "Do we want to maintain a capitalist system that depends upon the probability of collapse being the sole means of regulation?"
Fii
2 years ago
Related topic
I'm half way through the 4-part CBC doczone documentary "Meltdown: The men who crashed the world". It's excellent...
http://www.cbc.ca/doczone/meltdown/
Bailey
2 years ago
Source and structure as form and function
What qualifies one rather than another to be CEO? How does one get to be a CEO?
These things seem to me to be more akin to a religion or cult than to a legitimate social structure. In theory the purpose of a corporation is to produce something for which a need exists. If corporations as institutions had to argue for their survival, that is the nature of the argument they would have to make. They would need to say 'you need us to ------' Fill in the blanks yourselves.
This isn't very true anymore. Lots of corporations are just financial manipulators who take control of money, usually while it's moving, and grab off a bunch on the way by. banks and insurance companies fit this description more and more, preying on their customers far more that serving them.
You see the rise of individual managers to CEO resembling the rise of entertainers or preachers. They get big reputations as they come up, based on making some people spectacularly wealthy, far beyond any concept of earning, and then taking their own cut before moving on to the next movie or to the next tent .
They become stars because everybody knows that they can take whatever insiders can get them hired way beyond the dreams of Midas. What will then happen to whatever sector of the economy or of the community constitutes their particular stage or pulpit is not considered, not by them or by the insiders who hope to share the looting.
They have been so effective at conveying their dogma and inspiring willing suspension of disbelief among their audiences, that our governments have just recently paid out trillions to them for no reason anyone can state, and without any expectations of return.
Halleluia! Praise Jesus! Applause. Fade to black. Roll credits.
siamdave
2 years ago
the real obscenity -
- is the amazing fraud that so few people seem to understand that underlies all of our problems - "we" allow private commercial banks to create our money out of thin air - and charge interest on that money! - everything else follows, from the massive government debt via which our governments have been slashing spending on things most Cdns want the last 30 years to the systemic inflation which is devalue-ing our money so that savings are lower and debt higher for average people than ever before. And nothing is going to improve until people start to understand this great fraud/scam and take back "their" democracy. More detail here for anyone ready to start the (democratic) revolution - What Happened? http://www.rudemacedon.ca/what-happened.html .
Camero409
2 years ago
siamdave
That link at the bottom of your last post is invaluable to understanding what has happened to the Canada I knew growing up. I think also the anti-war movement of the late 60's early 70's scared the crap out of the governments and big business. They realized they had to stop the war and, to use a Palin euphanism, "reload". They then went after the workers protection, unions. Once they discredited them they went after benefits and now our Canada Pension Plan. They have got the American one now they're after ours. We will soon be serfs and that's the way they like it.
I received an email a while ago. It was exam from 1898, Math to be exact. I couldn't finish it. I know I'm not a genious but I did well in Math in high school. That exam prepared the student for the world. Now we prepare them for serfdom.
Fiat lux
2 years ago
The money, "created" by the
The money, "created" by the private banks from the air, belongs to the government/public, by law.
As only a country, or similar political unit is legally permitted to create money, because money is, in effect, a debt against which a government must provide resources to ensure its convertibility and maintain its value .
The more money the banks create, the higher the debt load on the public they have to pay for in resources and growing enslavement and poverty.
The most idiotic part is when governments borrow and pay interest on monies they already own by law.
Only politicians and ideologues can be that stupid.
Ed Deak.
RickW
2 years ago
I think it was in the 80's.......
.......that we the people were told it was foolish to save our money, as it held back the economy.
Now we are being told that we have spent too much and should be saving.
samuidave (not verified)
2 years ago
Alistair Cooke authored a great 13 part series
back in 1972 called America: A personal History of the United States. It is available on youtube here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqYq6WMw3Aw&feature=related
One remark he makes that is bang on:
He ends the show with a couple of quotes, but summarizes the matter like this:
Q: whether America is in its ascendent or in its decline?
Yes, we are in our decline and the fallout from this arrogant behemoth cicling the planet, unwilling to let go, is NOT going to be pretty. And I prophesize without any special skill that we will do nothing to prevent it happening.
cosh_jraig
2 years ago
The Solution
The solution to this is simple - stop patronizing these companies. Bank with a local credit union. Do some serious research about ethical investing. Buy a used car or join a car share. Use U-brews for good beer and wine. Shop local businesses and craftspeople for gifts and for yourself. Buy used where appropriate. Use linux based operating systems on refurbished computers. The list literally goes on and on with little or no sacrifice of our standard of living. Shut the bast**ds out.
DRL
2 years ago
Elite/overpaid
I have first hand knowledge of the fear these so called CEO's live under. Like have a body guard 24/7. Even being a bit of a sociopathic personality has a way of causing fear amoung the managers thus the downward flow of fear and reprisals continue. No single person should ever make what these ceo's make, they are not worth the front line works who do meet the public and try to smooth the constant gliches out of the matrix's created by the management to try to save their own hides.
Eg: Out-sourcing of the telephone services to another country...which hasn't improved the service and alienated the public.
Way to go with higher salaries for the ceo's.
RockyRacoon
2 years ago
Socialism or Barbarism: Those are our choices
there is no reason for any system to evolve into an oligopoly-safegaurds can be built into the constitutions-such as instant recall for politicians who don't do what we tell them to do. Even better would be the self administration of soceity by the direct producers. Increased technology should free us up to attend to and protect the democratic process. People complain about the system agree it is corrupt and broken yet the only viable solution socialism seems to have fallen victim to the same sort of propaganda as any other thinking that threatens capitalism. Thank God people in South America who have experienced the first hand the ugly underside of capitalism get the message, perhaps their experience with socialism will put the rabid dog anti-communist propagator's into the dust-bin of history along with the capitalism that such nonesense supports. And talk about dictatorship and totalitarianism-seems we are all subject to the despotism of the market-why is that ok?
realisticman
2 years ago
cosh_jraig
I think that you are right. You describe a basic philosophy that I've had for many, many years.
You say, there's little or no sacrifice to our standard of living. In many cases our purchases are of even higher quality.
Unfortunately, many people just want what others have and imagine that were they to have those same things then they would be happier. Sad and untrue.
As you say, it's quite simple.
Stewart MacKenzie
2 years ago
Hear hear
"Yes, we are in our decline and the fallout from this arrogant behemoth cicling the planet, unwilling to let go, is NOT going to be pretty."
Sam, you and I may disagree on strategy but we are on exactly the same page when it comes to identifying the problem.
What is scary is that Cooke's observations date back nearly 40 years, meaning we are that much further down the slippery slope. Every trend he noted has continued to a point where even he might be shocked at today's situation.
I believe it has gone much too far for redemption or reversal, and we should be preparing for the worst case scenarios as best we can. I don't expect enough of the public will wake up before the big collapse is under way, by which time simple survival will be the main priority.
dorothy
2 years ago
Shutting out the bastids
Yes, amen to that in spades. There are lots of people out there, who are 'into' this, but the mainstream lackeys manage to keep shouting them down as conspiracy-theory-crazed radicals, who are going to be the next Ruby Ridge lot. Not so. We are looking at the third-generation self-sufficers out there. ANYTHING you can do will push it in the right direction. Haven't I said it before, that a sweater-knitting granny is more subversive today than Molotov cocktail-slinging dress-up artists?? Urban peasants and all kinds of artisans and handymen are out there, right around your corner. Look for them, and GET that Canadian-made can-opener when you throw out, broken, your current cadmium-laden piece from you-know-where (never forgetting that one, 'real')