- Ms Kaye is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Mary Carlisle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Prem Gill is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nancy Flight is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Justin Everett is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- John Westover is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Nora Etches is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Edward Henderson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Bharadwaj Chandramouli is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Dean Chatterson is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Marius Scurtescu is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Robert Parkes is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- James Murton is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Susan Doyle is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Vincent Strgar is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Helen Spiegelman is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Subir Guin is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Kimball Finigan is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- Joanne Manley is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
- David Leach is a Tyee Builder. You can be, too.
BC's Energy Independence? Don't Believe It
Minister Lekstrom is wrong. Most new energy projects controlled by big firms outside BC.
Energy Minister Blair Lekstrom: Spreading myths.
Blair Lekstrom, B.C.'s minister of energy, mines and petroleum resources, is a small-town guy with small-town values. Self-reliance and entrepreneurship are his watchwords, especially when it comes to the generation of electricity.
British Columbia, Lekstrom has declared, ought to be "self-sufficient" in terms of electricity production and consumption. It would be wrong -- immoral, even? -- to rely on others for the electricity we easily can generate ourselves. (Actually, B.C. already is self-sufficient in electricity, but that's a story for another day.)
The energy minister, moreover, thinks it's "tremendous" that small businesses -- even those with little experience and virtually no capital -- are competing against larger, more experienced electricity providers to obtain long-term supply contracts from BC Hydro, the province's publicly-owned utility giant.
It all sounds great, doesn't it? Self-sufficiency. Entrepreneurial risk-takers. Why, you can't get more small-town that that.
Except, it's all a sham. British Columbia under Gordon Campbell's BC Liberal government has become increasingly dependent on non-B.C. owned corporations to produce high-priced electricity, which BC Hydro is forced (by government edict) to buy, and in turn sell at inflated prices to captive residential and commercial consumers.
Indeed, notwithstanding Lekstrom's paeans to electricity self-reliance and the inherent virtues of underfunded entrepreneurs, non-B.C. ownership of electricity-generation has quickened to a pace -- and scale -- never seen before.
Peace Country roots
Blair Lekstrom was born in North Battleford, Saskatchewan in 1961, and a few months later the Lekstrom family moved to Dawson Creek in northeastern B.C.
The future energy minister graduated from the local high school in 1979, married a local gal in 1982 and, after working 17 years as an installer-repairman for the local BC Tel office, won election as mayor in 1996. Five years later, Lekstrom captured a seat in the Legislative Assembly, representing his local constituency, Peace River South.
He won re-election to the legislature in 2005 and 2009, and after the latter contest was named to the Executive Council by Premier Gordon Campbell. His wife continues to work at the local high school, South Peace Secondary, where Lekstrom graduated 31 years ago.
Meanwhile, Dawson Creek's population has barely budged from the time when the Lekstrom family first arrived. Recorded in 1961 at 10,946; in 2006, it was 10,994.
It's understandable, then, that the lens through which Lekstrom views the province, politics and government policies, are coloured by his small-town values. In most cases that's a good thing; in others, not so much.
Lekstrom's values were on display in the legislature two weeks ago, on May 19, during the estimates debate on his ministerial budget. The discussion had turned to BC Hydro, and specifically to the two-year-old Clean Power Call, whereby the Crown corporation awards long-term Electricity Purchase Agreements (EPAs) to so-called independent power producers (IPPs).
Bruce Ralston, the NDP finance critic, questioned the energy minister on Finavera Renewables Inc., the fledgling Vancouver company (see here and here) that had just $6,695 in cash, assets of only $536,302 (which included an apparently unsecured $81,510 IOU from an employee) and liabilities in excess of six million dollars at the end of its most-recent fiscal year.
Somehow, in a logic-defying move that seemed to ignore the company's dismal balance sheet, BC Hydro announced that Finavera would get four much-valued EPAs for windfarms it proposed to build in Peace River South, Lekstrom's electoral district.
"I want to point out that I'm very proud of the fact that small companies in British Columbia can actually come into the process," Lekstrom declared.
In fact, he insisted, "If they are evaluated... and are able to receive an EPA, able to go out and raise the capital to deliver on what they said, that's tremendous. That's tremendous for the men and women that work for these companies. That's tremendous, I think... the opportunity to grow that small business into something larger."
Ralston seemed incredulous. "This is a firm with less than $7,000 cash on hand and less than $600,000 in total assets being asked to build an $800 million series of projects," he repeated.
Lekstrom would have none of it. "Many small entrepreneurs have bid in to calls of BC Hydro," he countered. "I stand by that. I'm extremely proud of the ability of companies in British Columbia, whether they be large or small, to be able to have the opportunity to grow their business..."
'Self-sufficient'?...
The corollary of Lekstrom's view, that small-business risk-takers ought to be encouraged to supply clean electricity to BC Hydro, is British Columbia must become "self-sufficient" in electricity.
Indeed, last week, on Wednesday, May 26, when Bill 17, the Clean Energy Act, was called for second reading, Lekstrom used the phrase repeatedly.
"Key among the objectives are ensuring that B.C. is self-sufficient in electricity once again," Lekstrom explained.
"The Clean Energy Act strengthens self-sufficiency by placing the commitment into legislation," he continued, "and by requiring B.C. Hydro to acquire an additional 3,000 gigawatt hours of electricity by no later than 2020, referred to as insurance."
He added: "Achieving self-sufficiency and meeting growing demand will require a renewed emphasis on energy efficiency and conservation and major new investments by the public sector and private sector in B.C.'s electricity system."
And, again: "In addition to Crown investments, new independent power projects will also be needed to achieve the self-sufficiency requirements. The clean and renewable electricity and technology sector has contributed significantly to the development of British Columbia's electricity system. The Clean Energy Act creates new opportunities for investments, jobs and economic growth in every region of our province."
In all, Lekstrom used the phrase "self-sufficiency" more than a dozen times at the beginning of second-reading for Bill 17. (Earlier, during Question Period, he had used the phrase twice.)
...Define 'self-sufficient'
To many British Columbians it's a compelling vision for the generation of electricity. B.C. entrepreneurs competing against bigger and better-financed corporations, thereby providing a boost to the province's small-business sector. Plus, British Columbia "once again" will achieve electricity self-reliance.
The reality of the government's policies, however, is much different than that described by Lekstrom.
The truth is found by digging into a statement the minister made at the the beginning of second-reading debate on Bill 17. "Since the late 1980s the private sector has developed 63 independent power projects in B.C.," said Lekstrom, "that account for approximately 14 per cent of British Columbia's domestic electricity requirements."
Indeed, a recent, up-dated listing from the Crown corporation shows 63 EPAs with IPPs "currently delivering power to BC Hydro."
(Sixteen were negotiated in the 1980s by the Social Credit government, with another 18 handed-out between 1994 and 2001 under New Democratic Party policies. A further 29 EPAs have come into effect since the BC Liberals took office.)
The key is to examine how much electricity is generated -- and sold to BC Hydro -- by these IPPs. And the fact is that production is dominated by huge corporations, nearly all of which are owned by people other than British Columbians. Local, small-business entrepreneurs play a role that is barely significant.
Foreign firms producing BC gigawatts
According to BC Hydro, the IPPs with 63 EPAs have been contracted to supply 10,343 gigawatts annually. Of that amount, however, 8,106 Gwh -- nearly 80 per cent -- is produced by non-B.C. owned corporations.
The two biggest electricity providers -- together they generate nearly 40 per cent of B.C.'s "independent" power -- are the Alcan aluminum plant (1945 Gwh) at Kitimat, and the Island Cogeneration thermal plant (1900 GWh) near Campbell River.
The former is owned by Rio Tinto, which is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia, and the latter -- once owned by Westcoast Energy, and then Calpine Corporation -- belongs to Kelson Energy of Maryland, U.S.A.
Other foreign corporations that own BC Hydro EPAs include the Macquarie Group, based in Sydney, Australia (which has run-of-river projects at Sechelt Creek and Hluey Lake), Covanta Energy of New Jersey (which recently bought the SEEGEN municipal-waste facility in Burnaby from Vivendi-Montenay of France), and Washington-based Summit Power (which owns two run-of river operations at Soo River and Doran Taylor, outside Port Alberni).
Spoils go to Alberta, other provinces
The third-largest IPP in B.C. is the McMahon Cogeneration Plant (840 GWh) at Taylor, located between Dawson Creek and Fort St John. It's owned by Calgary's Atco Power.
Alberta-based companies play a substantial role in B.C.'s independent power production. The biggest is Edmonton's EPCOR which, in partnership with its spin-off, Capital Power Corporation, owns five facilities in our province -- at Williams Lake, Miller Creek, Brown Lake, Mamquam River and South Moresby Island -- that are contracted to provide a combined 990 GWh.
Besides Atco, several other Calgary corporations have acquired B.C. EPAs. ENMAX owns 100 per cent of three B.C. run-of-river EPAs at Furry Creek, Lower Clowhom and Upper Clowhom, and 75 per cent of two waste-heat facilities at Savona and 150 Mile House. AltaGas has a run-of-river plant at Scuzzy Creek and is building a sizeable windfarm at Bear Mountain.
TransAlta, which last year bought Canadian Hydro Developers, owns run-of-river EPAs for Upper Mamquam and Akolkolex, and 50 per cent of Pingston Creek. WindRiver Power has a run-of-river plant on the Raging River near Port Alice.
Maxim Power -- which is co-owned by Brett Wilson, of Dragon's Den fame -- has three EPAs for municipal-waste plants at Delta and Victoria.
Quebec companies also play a major role in B.C. independent power production, Innergex has EPAs for three run-of-river facilities, and Boralex, one. Two Quebec-headquartered pulp companies, Tembec and Domtar, have EPAs for biomass operations at Skookumchuk and Kamloops respectively.
Rounding out Canadian corporations based outside B.C. are Brookfield Asset Management and Corpfinance of Ontario, and Fortis Inc. of Newfoundland.
The 'homegrown power' myth
That leaves about 2,400 GWh -- out of more than 10,300 GWh -- produced by British Columbia companies. Again, however, a closer examination reveals a different picture, because half of the B.C. production (1,196 GWh) is from three subsidiaries of Columbia Power Corp., a publicly-owned Crown corporation. Plus, two more EPAs are owned by the municipalities of West Vancouver and Lake Country.
Two of the biggest B.C.-owned EPAs -- Kwalsa Energy and Upper Stave Energy, at 384 GWh and 264 GWh respectively -- are held by Cloudworks Energy of Vancouver. Cloudworks' history has been to construct a run-of-river facility and then flip it to a bigger entity, as it did in 2005 with the Rutherford Creek plant (sold to Innergex).
So, how much electricity actually is generated by home-grown British Columbia entrepreneurs? Well, there are companies like Homestead Hydro near New Denver, owned by Jeff Ankenman and Sue McMurtrie, which generates less than one gigawatt hour of electricity per year. And we have Doug McDonald of McDonald Ranch and Timber Co. Ltd. He produces less than one-half a gigawatt hour per year at Grasmere.
There are a few more IPPs, perhaps a half-dozen or so, which may accurately be described as "B.C.-owned and -operated," but they're in the distinct minority. And the power they produce is a mere fraction of that sold to BC Hydro by the transnationals.
(The biggest electricity-generating, home-grown IPP seems to be Executive House Power Corporation, owned by the Jackson family of Victoria. They have two EPAs for run-of-river plants on Sutton Creek and Marion Creek on Vancouver Island, and also own Victoria's Executive House Hotel.)
Simply, the bulk of IPP electricity-generation is by very large, non-B.C. corporations, whose head offices are located in other Canadian provinces or in foreign countries.
It all raises two questions. First, by "self-sufficiency," do Blair Lekstrom and the BC Liberals mean that British Columbians must buy an ever-growing volume of electricity from corporations headquartered in Alberta, Quebec, Ontario, Australia and the U.S.A.?
And, second, is Blair Lekstrom, B.C.'s small-town energy minister, out of his league? ![]()



20
Login or register to post comments
Camero409
1 year ago
Energy Independence?
Hah! Blair! Buddy! Where are you buying that stuff? Whatever your smoking sure gives you a rosy outlook of Hydro Electric power in BC. Do you get the stuff from Victoria or Dawson Creek? Perhaps you hanging around gordos backend for too long?
Here's some advice Blair. Back away, get some fresh air and give your head a shake. Read this article Blair, then put your brain in gear before you open your mouth.
RickW
1 year ago
Blair as well.....
....is aiming for some directorships.
mariner
1 year ago
GOVENMENT CONFUSION ON POWER GEREATION IN B.C.
Well, well well - they can't seem to get their acts together.
Hhhhmmm- what is it INCOMPETENCE OR CORRUPTION OR A COMBINATION OF BOTH ?
Where do we get these clowns from - all the way up to the premier ????
More qusetions than answers eh !
Thank you
telus employee
1 year ago
and McMartin's point is......????
McMartin needs to explain what danger to BC's electricity self sufficiency is posed by just because the head offices of private companies are based outside of BC.
IPPs are private companies, no matter where they are based, which put profit above all other motives. The companies have very lucrative (corporate-welfare-like) contracts to sell power to BC Hydro well above market rates if they sold the electricity outside of BC. It seems like McMartin implying that companies based in BC work under a different dynamic that will put BC's energy needs above maximizing profits.
There are arguments far stronger than what McMartin has given here to suggest that BC's Energy independence is threatened by companies not having their head offices in BC. (and first and foremost the myth that BC is not self-sufficient in electricity production.)
Here are a few problems to BC's energy self sufficiency that are far greater magnitude than where companies are based.
1) BC's Energy independence is threatened by increased private sector involvement influencing public policy (no matter where the companies are based).
2)Closely related to 1) is the fact that IPPs are increasing their financial support to the BC Libs every year, giving them a stronger voice in energy policy creation favorable to IPP bottom lines instead of BC's interest. In 2001 companies benefiting from Hydro power purchases gave about $32 thousand to the BC Libs. Last year they gave $600 thousand.
3)Increased interconnections allowing for exporting/importing power outside of BC give us less control over our grid.
Skywalker
1 year ago
It just gets more depressing
Another excellent article Will. It is simply baffling that these pirates are still in control. Telus employee asks more of the interesting questions but it would seem that by putting our resources in the control of foreign interests we can't even expect the corporations to give a damn about BC - not that they probably would anyway. Loss of control also voids any responsibility I wonder why the CTF has never had one of their apologists write a book with the title "Pirates In The Garden".
Lekstrom is just another one of Campbell's lap dogs. If he had an original small rural town thought once, he has now sold out to all those directorships that will secure his future once he leaves our employ.
dave49
1 year ago
Realistically, we behind.
I don't know if it's the fact the MSM doesn't ask tough questions or most people don't really care, but this Liberal government spin is unrealistic to be polite. Wind power in BC is four to five years behind Alberta. Ontario installed smart meters in every home almost three years ago.
All we are leading is the hype race! Cut the puffery and get on with it if you really mean it!!!
RickW
1 year ago
telus employee
Good point! However, IPPs with head offices out of the province will inevitably find "reasons" to export the power, leaving BC in a deficit similar to what is claimed we have now.
And Site C? Well, that power is destined for Fort Mac.
telus employee
1 year ago
RickW
I would argue that your belief or hope (and McMartin's it seems) that non BC Companies would have more reasons to export power is just that; hope and belief. Any company is going to do what is best for the bottom line regardless of where they are from.
I will give you an example:
A couple of years ago I emailed Sea Breeze Power (a Vancouver company) as a potential investor if they planned to export power if they did not get an Power Purchase Agreement for their projects from BC Hydro. The answer was yes as you can see from the letter that will follow:
"With regards to the results of BC Hydro's Clean Power Call;
BC Hydro has stated that it will announce the winners of the Call in June 2009 - all proposals are undergoing a lengthy review process till then.
Our first choice is to sell power to BC Hydro. Should BC Hydro not require the electricity generated from the Knob Hill Wind Farm, there are other market opportunities along the west coast, namely California, but also Washington and Oregon. Electricity trade occurs daily between Canada and the US and is regulated by the National Energy Board in Canada. There is growing demand for renewable energy in California, which is evidenced most recently by the State's decision to meet 33% of its electricity needs through renewable energy resources by 2020. Out-of-state resources are eligible, and Sea Breeze has been monitoring developments in this policy. Though there are transmission constraints south of BC, Sea Breeze Power Corp. is addressing this issue by its involvement in a joint venture (Sea Breeze Pacific Regional Transmission System, Inc.) which is developing transmission projects to access markets south of BC. The Juan de Fuca Cable (www.jdfcable.com) is the most advanced of these projects, and will connect Vancouver Island with Washington's Olympic Peninsula.
I hope this answers your questions. If you have any further inquiries, please do not hesitate to contact me either via email or via phone at 604 689 2991 ext. 253. For Investor Relations information, you can contact Joseph Zhu at the same number, with ext. 231.
All the best,
Leah Maestri,
Communications Manager"
Small is good
1 year ago
finavera
Will: Do you think Gordo lets even the energy minister speak freely?
It's all scripted by the leader, eh!
You must be aware that Finavera is the two principals of Accenture who dismantled Hydro..........I think this is someone higher in the party than Blair.
I'm not sure why they would have a negative balance after all the money taxpayers have contributed to them!
ps.... I think you haven't lived in small towns and possibly are not aware of where your energy (electrical and otherwise ) is coming from...............small towns are no barrier to brains and perspective.
Although I don't agree with Minister Lekstrom , I find your article offensive. I've lived in several of the major North American cities and prefer this small town --- except for the energy boom which is ruining it!
G West
1 year ago
Umm
I think readers would do well to note this line from Will McMartin's article:
Actually, B.C. already is self-sufficient in electricity, but that's a story for another day.
This whole energy play is based upon a lie.
I expect Mr McMartin will deal with that too, in good time.
For a better world
1 year ago
Is Lekstrom out of his league?
As Mr. McMartin asks, Is Lekstrom out of his league? You bet he is! EDITED BY TYEE MODERATOR
RickW
1 year ago
telus employee
Hope? Well, yes -- however faint. But my point was more that, if BC is a net importer of electricity (according to the IPP proponents), it will remain so, despite (with apologies to Bogey in Casablanca) all the dams, on all the creeks, in all the province.....
Norman Farrell
1 year ago
Crimes are in progress
Will McMartin's facts are indisputable. It is worth noting that Finavera's auditors PricewaterhouseCoopers wrote this note to the financial statements:
The [Energy Purchase Agreements] with B.C. Hydro provide a revenue stream based on a defined price and are the commercial cornerstones of any power project in British Columbia, providing the basis to move forward towards project construction and operation.
Commercial cornerstones that allow impecunious corporations to structure billion dollar deals.
See more at Northern Insights:
Norman Farrell
1 year ago
Link:
Link to Crimes in Progress at Northern Insights is:
http://northerninsights.blogspot.com/2010/05/crimes-in-progress.html
telus employee
1 year ago
number of IPPs during exagerated?
"with another 18 handed-out between 1994 and 2001 under New Democratic Party policies"
McMartin says that 18 EPAs were handed out during the NDP years, but according to his own attachment 13 were signed in 2001. The Liberals came into power in May of that year so who is to say that the contracts were not signed under the new BC Liberal government.
The reason this is significant is that the mainstream press uncritically accepted the BC Liberal and IPP claims before the 2009 election that the NDP were just as guilty of signing IPPs as the Libs. Some idiotic NDPers even agreed.
Skywalker
1 year ago
Good point telus employee
Enough said.
Stonebreaker
1 year ago
Energy self-sufficiency? Doh! BC Imports 83% of our oil.
Note to Tyee: BC is a massive importer of "energy".
We import 83% of our primary energy source which is Big Oil.
It would take more than SEVEN site C dams to replace just the oil we import.
In addition BC consumes vast quantities of other fossil fuels including natural gas. Coal burning has been the fastest growing fossil fuel in BC since 1990. All of this "energy" comes from IPPs. Zero comes from government owned sources.
Top that all off with the fact that IPP fossil production as grown rapidly in BC since 1990 while renewable electricity production has stagnated for decades.
SUMMARY:
-- BC imports 7 SiteC's worth of "energy" each year. Only pro-BigFossil dis-informers try to pretend BC is close to "energy self-sufficient".
-- BC "energy" is mostly supplied by Big Fossil IPPs. If you care about globo-corporate control of your energy, here's a hint: Big Fossil control almost all of it and Big Renewables are only a drop in the bucket.
-- To replace BC fossil "energy", as we must soon for legal and moral reason, will require 90,000GWh of combined demand reduction plus NEW non-fossil electricity.
This is all public data and well known to people who care about BC citizens' energy future.
Don't you wonder why Tyee publishes article after article about BC "energy" and consistently leaves ALL these basic facts out? Why are they constantly hiding Big Fossil's footprints in BC?
Stephanie T
1 year ago
@Stonebreaker
Would you be so kind as to supply some links to this info? I have heard nobody but you ever mention this subject. Thanks.
Hugh
1 year ago
In addition to the 63 IPPs
In addition to the 63 IPPs in BC currently supplying energy to BC Hydro, roughly 60 more have been selected, but are not yet in operation.
Of these, about 35 have signed contracts with BC Hydro.
I believe that, once all the new IPPs are operational, the annual cost to BC Hydro to purchase IPP energy will be over $1 billion per year.
Frank
1 year ago
Stonebreaker
Still advocating that we wreck every river on the planet I see.