Opinion

Our Cities Are Hotbeds of Climate Action

Mike Harcourt on why, and where, big cuts in emissions can be achieved.

By Mike Harcourt, 4 Dec 2009, TheTyee.ca

Mike Harcourt with Smart Car

Harcourt: Let’s get rolling.

Related

Canada could have a comprehensive climate change action plan by June 2010. All the elements are there, if only we could see them. Greenhouse gas reductions of over 80 per cent are possible by 2040.

Impossible! some skeptics would say.

Very possible! this grizzled old political veteran believes.

What's the evidence? What's the plan?

The evidence lies with our cities -- the nine big and about 110 medium-sized cities where more than 90 per cent of Canadians either reside or live within an hour's commute. That's where the greenhouse gases are created. They are created by how we house, transport, power, feed ourselves. Those cities are where we consume too much. People in cities produce one half of Canada's greenhouse gases. The other half comes from the oil and gas fields, farms, mines, and forestry mills, whose products are shipped from rural areas to be consumed by people living in cities.

Fortunately, many Canadians have thought about city-based consumption, how we mitigate and adapt to the resulting greenhouse gas and climate change consequences. Sustainable cities and communities strategies and approaches have blossomed in the last five to six years.

Some examples are to be found on the Vancouver-based Sustainable Cities PLUS Network, which won the International Gas Unions 2003 Grand Prize as the world's best long term sustainable cities strategy.

Other examples are Whistler's Natural Step approach, Imagine Calgary and North Vancouver City's Sustainability Vision and Sustainability by Design Initiative offshoot from the CitiesPLUS initiative. As well, the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy produced a very good report in 2003 called Environmental Quality in Canadian Cities: The Federal Role. Also, the prime minister's task force submitted a report in 2006 called "From Restless Communities to Resilient Places: Building a Stronger Future for All Canadians." That report advocated a national role in helping to create sustainable cities and communities.

Sprawl busters

Many mayors and their councils already have recognized they are the solution, and have plans.

For example, Mayor Gregor Robertson has just launched a 10-year Greenest City Action Plan to make Vancouver the greenest city in the world.

Surrey Mayor Diane Watts and her counterparts in Coquitlam, Abbotsford and Langley -- other Lower Mainland high growth communities -- have launched sustainability charters and a joint Liveability Accord. The goal: No more sprawl. Smart Growth planning will produce higher density mixed-use city centres and transit corridors, and a huge increase in walking, cycling and transit. They're working with QUEST (Quality Urban Energy Systems of Tomorrow), a collaborative network with representatives from industry, environmental groups and government to create integrated, renewable energy approaches serving the region.

Calgary is one of many more cities across the country that has accepted long-term sustainability strategies. Guelph is implementing a community energy plan as part of its sustainability vision. Regional municipal associations like B.C.'s North Central Municipal Association (representing the 40 municipalities, regional districts and some First Nations communities) are sharing ideas on how to implement sustainability strategies. The Union of British Columbia Municipalities and many other municipal associations across Canada have aggressive urban sustainability and greenhouse gas reduction initiatives under way. So does the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.

Billions for sustainable infrastructure

What's surprising, is how underreported in the media, yet how impressive, such federal and provincial actions have been in the last 15 years:

  • The federal government’s infrastructure funding for municipal sewer, water, roads and bridges, transit ($750 million for Vancouver's Canada Line), gas tax agreements, and other programs now pump more than $5 billion per year into municipal sustainability programs.
  • Provinces like Ontario (Places to Grow), B.C. (Climate Change Action Plan), Alberta, Quebec and others are likewise engaged.
  • As well, there is federal provincial cooperation around community sustainable energy initiatives. In September, the Council of Energy Ministers agreed to a national approach called "Integrated Community Energy Solutions -- A Road Map for Action".

So there should be no doubt that the elements of a national plan are emerging in our cities and communities, provinces and national government.

What's missing is a clearly articulated vision binding all these initiatives and cooperative actions. It should be a national project, on the scale of the building of the Canadian Pacific Railway or the St. Lawrence Seaway.

Focus on fixing cities

Instead, all those incredibly exciting sustainable initiatives across Canada are lost in the cacophony of competing claims about the Kyoto Accord. We suffer through deadening legalistic argument about dates, deadlines and targets leading into December's Copenhagen climate change meetings (which will resolve nothing). Canada is seen as the laggard.

Enough of this nonsense! We will not reduce greenhouse gas emissions, we will not mitigate or adapt to global warning, we won't take a leadership role internationally -- until we clearly focus on our 21st century imperative. That imperative -- in this urban century when 3/4 of the world's nine billion population will live in cities -- is to transform the way we live in our cities and communities. We need to consume far less of our earth's natural capital of water, soil, forest, and oceans. Right now in North America we're consuming the equivalent of four Earths’ natural capital!

As a political and community activist for the last 40 years, I can tell you: Fix the way we do cities and you'll fix the greenhouse gas and climate change disaster we and our children face. Set all the quotas, targets, emission standards you want. Squabble and demonstrate in Copenhagen. It's all a waste unless we move rapidly and boldly towards creating sustainable Canadian cities and communities.  [Tyee]

37  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • freebear

    2 years ago

    Show me a sustainable city in Canada Harcourt!

    There are none, though many talk about 'achieving higher levels of sustainability'; 'sustained growth'; and 'becoming more sustainable' (Comox Valley sustainability strategy draft Nov 2009)!

    We can't even acknowledge that the way we live and do things is unsustainable!

    You can not achieve sustainability without sacrifice and recognizing limits!

  • seth

    2 years ago

    Who's listening to Mike?

    I haven't heard Mike apologize for the damage he caused with his support of Canwest/Campbell, his green tax and Pirate power projects during the election. I'm sure he's aware that Paul Krugman an actual Nobel Price winner in economics in a series of NYTimes articles agreed with the NDP that Cap n'Trade is much superior to the carbon tax contradicting completely the silly green tax that Harcourt and a few other prominent "socalled" environmentalists used to excuse their reelection support of Canwest/Gordo paving the way for five more years of environmental and economic destruction unparalled in British Columbia history. Krugman versus Jaccard an unknown socalled economist from the thoroughly disredited Chicago school hosted at Micky Mouse U here in town.

    Mike is right up there with Suzuki, Berman, Jaccard, and Andrew Morton with environmental credentials blackened beyond redemption.

    There are some relatively easy things cities can do.

    Telecommuting and 3 day work weeks could be encouraged by cities. Probably 75% of us could work 3 day work weeks and or telecommute. When do you think BC's dinosaur employers would allow either? Certainly not under Mike's Canwest/Gordo team.

    Where's the public transit? Nope money all spent on Canwest/Gordo megaprojects. What about a deregulated taxis service? Big Taxi campaign donations for crooked municipal politicians.

    What about natural gas as a vehicle fuel? Ain't happen'n because our gas company has sold out to Big Oil letting them sell natural gas worth 30 cents a liter equiv (home price) for 75 cents by buying a few CNG compressors and of course Canwest/Gordo. Check out how honest politicians in Utah support CNG autofuel.

    What about progressive communities like Nelson looking at community steam heat. They could eliminate megatonnes of annual CO2, and make a bunch of bucks by generating all the West Kootenay's power and Nelson's heat with a single $30 million Hyperion hot tub sized nuke sited in the BCHydro substation. But no nukes in BC, only 20 times the cost Pirate Power allowed - Canwest/Gordo again!!!

    Yes local action is possible but even local progressive leaders like Gregor Robertson and Derek Corrigan refuse to help. No 3 day work weeks, new transit, deregulated taxis, telecommuting, or CNG compressors in Vancouver or Burnaby thank you.

    Progressive leaders, with their example, could get us well on the way to meeting Kyoto targets within the year, but Big Business's with their unregulated between election campaign donations wouldn't like it.

    The final answer - a $150 billion investment in Canadian mass produced nukes, would be paid for by and would end Canada's $100 billion annual fossil fuel bill- a two year payback using only a small fraction of our industrial capacity.

    www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-kirsch/add-a-gigawatt-a-day-to-k_b_261728.html

  • Dan the socialist

    2 years ago

    Surrey Mayor Diane Watts and

    Surrey Mayor Diane Watts and her counterparts in Coquitlam, Abbotsford and Langley -- other Lower Mainland high growth communities -- have launched sustainability charters and a joint Liveability Accord.
    ===========

    Diane Watts and sustainability and liveability is an oxymoron.

    Those in the know refer to her as Diane 'develope everywhere' Watts...Gawd help us if this female Campbell ever becomes premier..

  • soleprobe

    2 years ago

    please snail mail this gentleman to wake him up

    Could somebody please send a letter to this dude about climategate? He obviously spends little time, if any, on the Internet.

    Thanks

  • frank2

    2 years ago

    Dealing with the 350ppm (or

    Dealing with the 350ppm (or 2degrees ceiling) issue not an either or question as implied by Harcourt's conclusion,

    "Fix the way we do cities and you'll fix the greenhouse gas and climate change disaster we and our children face. Set all the quotas, targets, emission standards you want. Squabble and demonstrate in Copenhagen. It's all a waste unless we move rapidly and boldly towards creating sustainable Canadian cities and communities."

    Fixing cities in the WEST is PART of the solution. But major changes are needed to establish real constraints. Carbon taxes have a big role to play. But so do enforceable targets (caps). And so does "subsidy" from the rich to the poor (to make up for our having used up more than our share of the environmental resource).

  • Luke

    2 years ago

    Kudos Mike!

    Moderate and common sense Mike! I'm encouraged about your sustainability work in the Metro Vancouver region and the similar work of Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson.

    What has most impressed me is the future vision of Surrey mayor Diane Watts for Surrey Centre in Whalley. It's akin to what has transpired along the old brownfields of Vancouver's North False Creek and perhaps even more impressive:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/20293850/City-of-Surrey-Civic-Centre-Development-Project

    It's all about "Growing Up"!

  • carfreecity

    2 years ago

    ecocities

    The World Ecocity Summit will be happening in Turkey this week.
    I attended the last one in San Francisco.
    It was truly thrilling to meet so many active reps from all around the world with their plans and projects.
    Someone from Vancouver gave a presentation. At the break people came up to me and said how wonderful it must be to be from Vancouver. Well, said, I. I don't now what city he was talking about, it was not my experience. There is so much TRAFFIC, I can't stand the place,
    A beautiful area, ruined by the overuse of the automobile.
    This ignorance needs to be addresses now.
    Coquitlam? Its horrid out there. WAll to wall MALLS and everybody drives. Buses don't even go inti the malls.
    The Park and Ride area is treeless and pedestrians are surrounded by lanes and lanes of traffic.
    There isn't even a washroom at the bus loop and no water fountain.
    The long time ago lovely downtown Port Coquitlam is now bumper to bumper with automobiles. Young mothers with infants and toddlers wait at bus stops absorbing all the exhaust. Seniors too.
    What terrible design, making us share passageways with automobiles.
    Downtown Vancouver is equally exhausting.
    Auto congestion everywhere. I don't even like to visit the Art Gallery.
    Health Canada should have acted and regulated auto use decades ago.
    This auto use is a huge hurdle and having Harcourt with his little auto doesnot help. Electric cars will be okay but how many BC woekers will be able to afford them.?
    The arrogance of drivers persists.

  • mopled

    2 years ago

    Before we go warping everything on the false premise

    that CO2 is the problem, could we look at our real needs. Just concentrate on the real stuff. Less traffic, more public transportation and better air. Summer temperature inversions are just awful and anything we can do not to contribute to smog is great.

    But please people...drop the carbon counting from any considerations. For those of you who missed it, here is Rex Murphy's take on Climategate.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Am3-HpSnE9Y&feature=related

    These are treacherous times and if we are going to practice the Precautionary Principle, it should be employed by not proceeding to do anything on the basis of such shoddy and perhaps criminal work without a real investigation first.

    "If you believe in global warming or not, a royal commission is a good starting point to determine whether should put WWII like resources to combat this issue or simply ignore it. To make such a determination we need unbiased evidence and analysis. I feel that the only logical course of action is to have a Royal commission."
    http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/royal-commission-to-determine-extent-of-global-warming.html

  • zalm

    2 years ago

    Soleprobe et al

    What's with the "climategate" references? You think you've won some major battle with the great Satan or something? Don't you see we're all on the same side, only you don't like the way a majority of people have decided they want to go about it? Don't you "engineers" (using the term loosely) agree with using resources ever more efficiently, inventing the next great wave of mechanical evolution and getting the jump on the competition to produce the next wave of innovation that happens to save money, energy and resources, not to mention reducing waste?

    Or are you too married to your 7-litre V-8 individual people-movers to see past your dirty windshields?

    Gawd, you guys are boring. Wake up and move on!!! I'm not buying carbon credits, nor is anyone else I know. It's like the refrigerator that orders a carton of milk from the story for you - a solution in search of a problem. Get a little perspective, at least longer than a week.

  • RickW

    2 years ago

    Now hold on a minute there!

    Quote:
    Telecommuting and 3 day work weeks could be encouraged by cities.

    The object of governments today is the 24/7 workweek @ $2/hr...........

  • Chris Keam

    2 years ago

    Rex Murphy

    Seriously? I mean yeah, he's an erudite and entertaining guy who panders to populist sentiment, so he's got that going for him, but you want me to reassess climate change because a TV personality chasing ratings tells people what they want to hear?

    The Denial camp talks a good game when it comes to relying on science, but when push comes to shove, there's a disconcerting dependence on anything but good research to advance their case.

  • soleprobe

    2 years ago

    Majority becoming the minority

    Zalm, the majority is quickly sinking into the minority because more of that majority is waking up to realize that they don’t want every facet of their lives scrutinized by a bunch of commie control freaks who have hijacked the environmental agenda to hoard for themselves and deprive everyone else to the point of impoverishment.

    Leave me alone. It’s nobody’s business what I drive, how far I drive, where I drive, what I eat, how much I eat, what I wear, what I buy, what I sell, where I live, where I work, where I play, how much money I have, what meds I will or will not take, how many children I will or will not have or anything else. You are not God so stop trying to rule the planet.

    These godless commie control freaks want to make normal human behavior a crime so they can pass oppressive legislation for the purpose of plunder in the guise of saving the earth.

  • Blue Camas

    2 years ago

    Vancouver seems to be listening to Mike

    Hear hear Mike, your article is a beacon in a sea of despair!

    I would add that after after recently attending a presentation by City of Vancouver Sustainability (http://vancouver.ca/sustainability/index.htm), I felt that what you describe is real. I heard a reasonable, achieveable plan for stopping tens of thousands of tonnes of Greenhouse Gas emissions within the next ten years, just through smart adjustments to building permit processes. Apparently other initiatives are being pursued as well.

    Public support is critical to maintaining such government sponsored action.

    To this end, I would like to offer to the various writers who dispute the need for action, the following by/for laymen's guide to climate change. I hope that the following short list may be sufficient allow any non-expert to decide for themselves.

    A Web Guide to Climate Change

    What is the nature of the debate?
    http://www.desmogblog.com/
    http://www.monbiot.com/
    http://www.lomborg.com/
    http://cei.org/

    What is the consensus of scientific opinion?
    http://www.ipcc.ch/
    http://www.realclimate.org/

    What do the scientific dissenters say?
    http://www.climateaudit.org/
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fz8KiA-YMt8

    Decide for yourself.
    Here are two sites that will help you evaluate your sources, yourself.
    http://scholar.google.ca/
    http://www.eecg.utoronto.ca/~prall/climate/

  • Chris Keam

    2 years ago

    Godless? Haven't you heard of the Gore-Zuki idols we worship?

    "These godless commie control freaks want to make normal human behavior a crime so they can pass oppressive legislation for the purpose of plunder in the guise of saving the earth."

    Damn, you saw right through the great world-control plans. Your prize is this piece of valuable advice:

    As long as you stick to distilled rainwater and pure grain alcohol your precious bodily essence should remain un-polluted by the commie global warming thought control nanobots.

  • RickW

    2 years ago

    soleprobe

    Quote:
    It’s nobody’s business what I drive, how far I drive, where I drive, what I eat, how much I eat, what I wear, what I buy, what I sell, where I live, where I work, where I play, how much money I have, what meds I will or will not take, how many children I will or will not have or anything else. You are not God so stop trying to rule the planet.

    You're right. It's nobody's business for all of the above -- until what you get is taken from someone else's mouth.

    This is Lifeboat Earth, and there are only so many "rations" to go around. Do what you want with what you got. But when it's gone, it's gone, and you have no right to someone else's share. And believe it or not, it doesn't matter a hoot how much money you may have. If there are six people and six cans of beans, you cannot buy another can.

  • inwonderment

    2 years ago

    What is Sustainability

    To environmentalists in the age of modernity sustainability is code for more growth and more density. If Vancouver really wanted to be a sustainable city it would set a target to re-establish its industrial land and commercial lands to 1990 levels rather than convert more industrial land to residential use. North Americans are being held hostage by bankers and the real estate industry.

    One has to shake one’s head at the suggestion that Abbotsford is a suitable city. Yes it does plan to increase density – every developer’s dream; while it plans to take another 2400 acres of land out of the agricultural reserve.

    How anyone calculated how much carbon and pollution would be reduced if we returned to a Sunday closing. Fewer trips to malls for shopping, fewer trips to work, less heating of building, and more time for community, family, and friends.

  • Chris Keam

    2 years ago

    "It’s nobody’s business

    "It’s nobody’s business what I drive, how far I drive, where I drive"

    How fascinating that the first thing on your list requires so much of the public purse for you to enjoy the privilege of using non-renewable resources and generating pollution to get around. When what, how and where you drive is subsidized by the public to the tune of $6000 a year, it's everybody's business.

  • alive

    2 years ago

    hey Soleprobe:

    You may feel that you behave correctly, but not everyone is perfect, and that is why laws are needed!

    The more concentrated our population gets, the more we need laws that restrict what you can do!

    Smoking bans finally save people from secondhand smoke (more or less).

    Seatbelt laws save lives, and so does all the new safety equipment that is mandatory now.
    Maybe your life is of no consequence to you, but if you cannot skid into my lane because your ESP system took over, then at least I am happy.

    Do I care if you drive a polluting monster? yup I do care because I need to breathe, and just like inhaling secondhand cigarette smoke does, so will car pollution kill me

  • Intention Pure

    2 years ago

    Truth

    "Seatbelt laws save lives, and so does all the new safety equipment that is mandatory now". Sorry to change the subject but this kind of blind faith is a fundamental problem in these discussions. Are you aware of the fact that independent testing of children's car seats revealed such mismanufacture resulting in equipment failure that the information was not released to the public. CBC covered this. Likewise, we just found out that "Canadian versions" of globally available supermarket brand foods contain significantly MORE SALT than the products made for other nations. All I am saying is regulations (and GOD FORBID) more laws, are not going to protect us from ourselves. This arises out of the fact that we all need to know the truth in order to protect ourselves, and the desire to know the truth comes from within each one of us, not from an external force/law.

  • srfl

    2 years ago

    Soleprobe ~ Nobody's Business?

    It is this attitude by people that is exactly what has caused this planet to be in the trouble it is in. No thought for anything but ME!

  • alive

    2 years ago

    beware yourself

    blind faith eh?
    Let me put it this way: the laws were passed with the best of intentions.
    That manufacturers try their best to accomodate the law and still save on parts and labour is another story.
    We only know about all the failures because the system eventually does catch up with cheats.
    The point was that laws are needed!
    I agree that more safeguards are essential, but, please do not let that soleprobe think we are passing laws just to piss him off!

  • soleprobe

    2 years ago

    "WE" are passing laws just to piss him off!

    It's that WE I don't like. The more laws the bigger that WE gets till it becomes like a parasite sucking the life and freedom out of everyone and everything. That WE doesn’t create anything, doesn't invent anything... all it does is suck off of those who create and produce... that WE is like a cancer killing its host. Every new law requires another department of bloodsuckers to enforce that new law.

    The bloodsucking WE wants those who are free individuals and full of innovation, creativity and the spark of life to believe that they are incapable of regulating themselves and need their so called “experts” to corral them into settlement zones where they can be tagged, tracked, traced, culled and monitored… becoming the collective property of the bloodsucking, parasitical WE.

    That’s why this essential element of life, CO2, is so important to the bloodsucking WE because it represents life. The WE is anti life. And this WE, being the cancerous parasite that it is, will suck the life out of every free human being on this planet by choking off the life-giving exhaust of life, CO2.

    The bloodsucking WE grows bigger and bigger with each new legislation: It has no soul, no conscience, no remorse, no sympathy, no compassion, no reasoning, no flexibility; it’s a cold, callous, all consuming BEAST.

    WE… leave me alone… you soulless, bloodsucking, control freak creature that produces and creates nothing. History is littered with the end results of your treachery: war, disease, famine, suffering and death.

  • alive

    2 years ago

    you need nobody?

    Wow, struck a nerve eh?

    "free individuals and full of innovation, creativity and the spark of life " is quite a mouthfull and describe a lot of people who may not agree with you, because I for one do not agree with you!

    My life has been full of initiative and I have had no problem realizing that even if I am smart, I still have to conform to certain standards as the price of living in this society.

    You see without all those uncreative, soulless parasites you hate so much, there would be nobody to buy the stuff you invent!

    You remind me of another poster who maintained that power is might and should precede mere normal human beings.

    Sorry to inform you soleprobe that you need to probe deeper still to figure out what gave you the idea that you are so special!

    Like it or not this is a living, breathing society and everybody depend on everybody!

    If you are convinced you need nobody then make a move to true capitalistic country, and see how you fare in a competitive society where nobody gives a shit.

  • soleprobe

    2 years ago

    The WE is not "nobody".

    "You see without all those uncreative, soulless parasites you hate so much, there would be nobody to buy the stuff you invent!"

    So I need the WE to rob through violence all my produce resulting from my ingenuity and creativity so the WE can give a tiny fraction back by purchasing, if IT chooses to do so, some of what I create.

    “You remind me of another poster who maintained that power is might and should precede mere normal human beings.”

    The WE is that “power” and “might”. But the WE does not “precede mere normal human beings”. It is a relatively small collection of abnormal, malignant, psychopathic, morally deranged human beings that are terrified by the masses of “mere normal human beings” who are by their nature innovative and creative.

    “… what gave you the idea that you are so special!”

    All individuals are special, and that’s exactly what the parasitical WE wants everyone to believe, that they are not special, that they are the least special living creatures on the planet, that they are toxic and worthless by nature to their environment and should be corralled and culled into a small manageable heard of homogenous zombies.

    “Like it or not this is a living, breathing society and everybody depend on everybody!”

    This is true, and if the parasitical, bloodsucking, control freak WE would just leave everybody alone then all the “mere normal human beings” on this planet would achieve their true potential.

    “If you are convinced you need nobody….”

    No…. I don’t need the WE. My neighbour and I are quite capable of helping each other out with out a control freak parasitical WE sucking the life out of us.

    “…then make a move to true capitalistic country….

    You do not have a full understanding of what I’m saying but there is no such thing as a “true capitalistic country”

    “… and see how you fare in a competitive society”

    Societies, when left to themselves, are culturally diverse and distinct from one another according to their family of origin and flourish and prosper in their own distinct ways as nature intended. But the WE control freak parasite can’t leave societies alone. Just like the indigenous peoples of every continent who have flourished for thousands of years until the WE control freak, bloodsucking, parasite arrived with it’s “social planning.” One only need look at the present state of the indigenous peoples of the North American continent to see the near end results that will be foisted upon an unsuspecting planet if the WE control freak gets its way.

    “…where nobody gives a shit.”

    Here is a perfect example of the arrogance of the WE telling the individual that he/she is immorally decrepit by nature and unable to care for another (the exact same claim it made about indigenous tribes) and only IT can save the earth from the naturally immoral individual.

  • RickW

    2 years ago

    soleprobe

    If you don't want the "we", then you must by nature be a student of anarchism.

    Anarchism is founded on the observation that since few men are wise enough to rule themselves, even fewer are wise enough to rule others.
    - Edward Abbey

    Chris Keam gets to the nut of the matter:

    Quote:
    how and where you drive is subsidized by the public to the tune of $6000 a year

    How do you "get around" this simple fact without recognizing the bureaucracy required (the WE you so rail against) to collect and distribute that 6 grand?

    Hey -- I for one would love to see a functioning state of anarchism. But (as Alive notes):

    Quote:
    The more concentrated our population gets, the more we need laws that restrict what you can do!

    We are simply not mature enough to conduct our own affairs, in and among other like-minded people in what we call "society".

    If you are not, then you truly blowing smoke.

  • soleprobe

    2 years ago

    The more concentrated our population gets

    Read UN Agenda 21

    That's exactly what the “WE” have been doing and will continue to do..... forcefully move populations out of rural areas and farms and concentrate them into settlement zones (crowded cities and shanty towns). This is done intentionally so the WE can cull the herd.

    Humans individually left to themselves are not perfect but history has shown us, like indigenous North Americans, that they can take care of themselves. The problem is when you get a group of these individuals who are not just naturally imperfect but are a bunch of decrepit control freak psychopaths that have positioned themselves for the grand takeover by stealth.

  • mcccarthy

    2 years ago

    sustainable bafflegab

    If Vancouver was serious about sustainability they would quite allowing developers to build concrete towers for speculators to add to their portfolio by instituting residency requirements. Concrete production is a high emitter responsible for 10% of all green house gas.

  • alive

    2 years ago

    guess he is for real?

    Somehow I visaulize soleprobe joining one of those groups that have purchased a lot in a remote area, stocked with supplies and arms, to they can gather there when the mob threatens them.
    A group paranoid about regular human beings, imagining that they somehow might get a smidgen of their wealth?
    The "we's" that form government to protect themselves from entrepenours who think their contribution is more valuable than anyone elses.
    It makes me feel good to know that I am as rescourcefull as you, but not stuck with conceit.
    Over and out soleprobe, you can have the last rant

  • RickW

    2 years ago

    soleprobe

    Quote:
    That's exactly what the “WE” have been doing and will continue to do..... forcefully move populations out of rural areas and farms and concentrate them into settlement zones (crowded cities and shanty towns). This is done intentionally so the WE can cull the herd.

    I'll grant you this, soleprobe. Give this a read:
    http://ecospheric.blogspot.com/2009/11/green-books-campaign-war-in-country.html

  • soleprobe

    2 years ago

    "... paranoid about regular human beings"?

    The “WE” are not “regular human beings”: They’re criminal, control freak, bloodsucking psychopaths. I’m not “paranoid” as a result of their existence; I was born under the current criminal establishment. But as with most criminal gangs, I never trust them, believe them or like them. Unlike the online world, in my real offline world I never seem to meet anyone who defends them.

    Alive, your passionate defense has been noted.

  • soleprobe

    2 years ago

    Thanks RickW

    "The War in the Country" is an important subject and I would most certainly like to read this book. Now I gotta see if I can pick it up at a lower mainland bookstore.... I don't shop online.

    Thanks for the link

  • make_up_another...

    2 years ago

    The War In The Country

    A good read. It strikes home for me literally, because I'm from the area the author lives in.

    I used to just sort of assume that by living in a rural area you somehow live greener. Lately, I've realized how that old rural life is mostly gone. Now along the 401 are a bunch of small towns and rural areas where farm land is severed into lots, homes going up all over. Not subdivisions, but a sort of rural suburb.

    Where do these people work? It can't be in the nearby towns, there's nothing there. Do they all drive an hour and a half to the GTA? Are they retirees? I don't know.

    All I know is the scenic, but now underused farm land in rural Ontario is being swallowed up. You can't drive down a country road without seeing all the for sale signs on newly severed lots proclaiming 'Build your dream home!'.

    People might want to call that growth, but other than the grocery store, gas station, etc., these new homes don't signal any influx of new jobs in these areas. The farms are gone or going, there's no new jobs, so where do these people go?

    Now I'm in the GTA, lured by employment, miserable. Rent a room in a basement. Can't afford an apartment despite 'good' salary. I want to go back, but where do I work? Not everyone wants to live in Toronto.

  • dave49

    2 years ago

    seth

    Seth, Utah is probably the most theocratic state in the USA. Are they doing promoting CNG vehicles because it is the right thing to do or because it is dictated?

  • steidle

    2 years ago

    well then, don't support highway expansion

    Harcourt has been a strong advocate of suburban highway expansion, including the Port Man Bridge, the doubling of the freeway, more roads in Surrey, an expanded Massey Tunnel, etc etc. If anything will lead to sprawl and more emissions, it is this. I brought this up with Harcourt once and he says: "well Vancouver has three bridges going into its downtown core."

  • edoherty

    2 years ago

    Then stop building freeways

    "Enough of this nonsense!"

    I agree. We need to make big changes now. And that means shifting the billions presently being spent on urban freeways to improve public transit.

    In this day and age, building freeways is the worst kind of nonsense.

    see www.gatewaysucks.org for actions you can take to stop this nonsense! (Mike, that means you too).

  • Bruce Elkin

    2 years ago

    All or nothing thinking?

    I'm struck by the comments above, by the "all or nothing" tone of so many of them. Art, said John Ruskin, is the place where the head, hands, and heart come together.

    The art of creating sustainable cities - or lives, families, … nations, Earth - also requires the coming together of our heads, hands, and hearts.

    The act of creating anything starts with a clear and compelling vision of a desired result (the heart; passion!).

    And that vision must be grounded in an objective, accurate and emotionally neutral assessment of current reality, the current state of the result (the head),

    And finally, out of the creative tension generated by the far away vision and the close at hand reality, we roll up our sleeves and take action (the hands).

    Now here's my point. That action does not have to be "right." Not at first. In creating, there's a process of "create and adjust, create and adjust…"

    Actions get taken, results noted, and new actions taken, all within the container for creating set up by the creative tension created by holding vision and reality in mind together.

    Sometimes someone will put forth a vision and get shot down because it's not "realistic". Or a realist will be ignored because s/he is not visionary enough. Meanwhile the activtist get antsy, "Pitter patter, let's get at 'eh!" and head off without either vision or reality.

    So, lets think a bit more about where in the act of creating various ideas or proposals fit: vision, current reality, or action. And be a bit more understanding and open to what is proposed, seeing it for what it is, not for what it isn't.

    I think Harcourt's idea of creating sustainable cities is a high-leverage vision, easily grounded in reality and very actionable.

    On the other hand, he didn't mention the Tar Sands, which is one of the big elephants in the room, and one of the worst polluters on the planet.

    But, practicing what I preach, I say let's take action where we can - cities - and while we do, many more folks will learn about sustainability and be able to see the Tar Sands for what they are, and -eventually - take action to shut them down. I hope!

  • RougePierre

    2 years ago

    Calgary has a long way to go

    Thanks for the kudos for Calgary, Mike, even if they're misplaced. As a long time resident of this cement city, I can tell you that we are still defined by over the top development and massive unnecessary road systems. Public transportation? support for small electrical generation and reverse metering? Subsidies for home upgrading? Lip service only. Like every other jurisdiction in Canada, the elected representatives here are primarily interested in short term visible "solutions" and in being reelected. If it isn't a photo-op, forget it. We also have our share of those frightened conservative pinch-purses on city council who won't vote for anything that might be innovative or might cost a bit up front.

    Maybe some day......

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.