News

A Tyee Series

In High Rent Cities, Vehicles Become Homes

To stay in the Vancouver neighbourhood she loves, Angela lives full time in her RV.

By Aleksandra Sagan and Calyn Shaw, 6 Aug 2012, TheTyee.ca

"Mobile Living," by Aleksandra Sagan and Calyn Shaw.

Related

[Editor's note: This is part of an occasional series of videos created by students at the University of British Columbia's Graduate School of Journalism on how Vancouver's high cost of living affects the city's working poor. Mobile Living was created, shot and produced by Aleksandra Sagan and Calyn Shaw. Here's more on the inspiration behind the video.]

Angela began living in her RV nine years ago. She decided to embrace her alternative accommodations because she can’t afford an apartment in Kitsilano, but didn’t want to give up the community she loves. Now she lives for about $500 per month in her home on wheels.

Our video story began when we set out to learn more about how people in Vancouver deal with the expensive cost of living. Vancouver’s housing prices are high, and groceries are expensive along with other essentials. Some people are forced to live in their vehicles, and still others choose to do so. We set out to learn more about who was living this way and why.

As soon as we met Angela we wanted to tell her story. She is the perfect example of someone pushed to the margins by Vancouver’s high cost of living. And she isn’t alone: people all over the city live in cars, vans and RVs. This is just one story.  [Tyee]

17  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • doggone

    41 weeks ago

    Mom is only 93 and still cheerful

    But she always thought she was descended from Gypsies. She has a fairly comfortable place but is never totally satisfied.
    I think Angela and Mom would have good conversation or maybe do a "Thelma and Louise".
    We did a bit of "R.V" ing this spring and found that a stabilized couple could live together in a tiny space for about three days in wet cool weather.
    Mind you we have an house we can run back to to have a bath and cook a meal.
    This reminds me: I try to call Mom on Sunday mornings and I missed this morning.
    Oops

  • Danny Handelman

    41 weeks ago

    The cost of housing is high due to government intervention

    Housing would be cheaper if it were more profitable for builders to build upward rather than outward through elimination of height and minimum setback restrictions, requiring infill buildings to have the ground floor(s) used for retail and office space, imposing maximum automobile parking of 0, decreasing development charges to 0 for infill and increased for low-density land use, and basing property taxes on the value of land alone rather than both land and building.

  • dorrie

    41 weeks ago

    voice over

    timely and interesting vid...however i find it almost impossible to view because of the irritating voice over. young journalists need seriously to do some articulation and voice mod excercises. the "throat closing" at the end of phrases frequently a habit of young women and the poorly articulated words and phrases are very off-putting...almost like "down speaking" ... have to say ...

  • bfearn

    41 weeks ago

    Cost of housing..

    Danny, you may be right. Your suggestions might reduce the cost of housing but would most of us like to live in such a Vancouver??

  • Hakuin

    41 weeks ago

    there's an ocean of people with money

    still out there looking for safe haven in coming bad times. All densification will do (upwards or outwards) is bring more of them and sooner. Unless purchasing rights for existing Vancouverites (or even Pacific Columbians) are protected by law, the outbidding will continue.

  • pwlg

    41 weeks ago

    government intervention

    I have a different opinion than Danny. In the late 70's and into the 80's there was a great deal of government intervention into the housing sector especially into cooperative housing. There were far more opportunities for affordable housing back then than now.

    Seems the higher density towers in the downtown core didn't bring housing down but perhaps inflated it.

    High rise development in White Rock saw brought higher prices not cheaper.

  • scandal_402

    41 weeks ago

    Affordable housing

    As the city, provincial, and federal governments are not interested in or able to effect real change in the numbers of safe affordable housing stock, perhaps its time they embrace and support this alternative form.
    There is a lot of undeveloped and unused sites and parking areas, which with the addition of a few necessities (hook ups for power, water, and sanitation, or washroom facilities with showers) would at least allow mobile housing dwellers to live safely with dignity.
    I know people who presently live in RVs, daily having to master the difficulties of finding a place to park, living without dependable access to power, water, and washroom facilities. Add all that to the daily grind of working (yes they work at full time jobs), and all the other tasks we all do every day.
    Every place I go I see seemingly abandoned or unused properties and spaces, which with little effort or cost could become alternate temporary to permanent housing, all it would take is the will and permission of the local and provincial powers that be.

  • lowball

    41 weeks ago

    Very sad.

    As one who currently lives in a smaller community in the southern interior and one who was raised in a rural setting, this is a sad and pathetic situation. Not only are young people holing up in cave-like atmospheres addicted to all the social media devices of the day, older people are forced to live in their RV's due to the high cost of living.
    As Canadians, we are unique in a lot of ways because of our historical proximity and use of our northern boreal forests and wilderness. However, we now have the majority of Canadians living in larger cities within 50 miles of the USA border. IMO, we are losing our uniqueness and simply becoming a dumbing down version of the American/Canadian dream. I am fearful for my grandchildren and their children where we simply become tied to the mindless consumerism of urban dwellers who believe milk comes from a carton rather than a cow.

  • marine1941

    41 weeks ago

    Living in your van in Vancouver

    There is nothing new about this. In the 1950's the principal of Henry Hudson Elementary in Kits worked hard to find a place where families who had kids in his school, but were living in their cars
    (using the washrooms in two local gas stations) could have a weekly shower.I live in an area now where we have UBC grad students in a RV moving their location every 2 weeks...not far, need to stay on the same bus route to get to school, but they are in their second year of doing this..and the CBC did radio interviews of some earlier students living the same way. When we first moved to this area 30 years ago, there was an almost permanent floating pool of Romany trailers. a few years later,when the houses started to gentrify they moved on, but dont ever think its unusual to live like this in Vancouver

  • alive

    41 weeks ago

    Nobody NEEDS Vancouver!

    I would not be surprised if many of the people "needing" housing in Vancouver, could as easily do their work from home over the internet!
    Meaning they could live anywhere! --- given some flexibility from the employers.

    Some factories have had the foresight to locate outside the central area and as a result the workers have also moved out of there.

    Freeing up on requirements would please any developer, but cause endless damage,--------- beside the frustration of trying to live in 300 square feet (which seems to be the latest design).

    Vancouver has become what it is chasing the almigthy dollar, looking the other way when mature trees happen to give way for concrete driveways with several luxury vehicles displayed!

    Best advice is to abandon that place and settle for a less hectic life elsewhere ---yes, give up on your need to attend every damned "festival" and spend time with your family instead!

  • Hakuin

    41 weeks ago

    Any gay youth I've talked to

    iIn Vancouver that wasn't raised there was fleeing the repression of that "less hectic" life . Think of them as an indicator species.

  • RickW

    41 weeks ago

    Ah - The "Sunset" Years.......

    Good to know that Christy's $475G credit card "expense" takes precedence......

  • freewilly

    41 weeks ago

    What happened?

    "In the late 70's and into the 80's there was a great deal of government intervention into the housing sector especially into cooperative housing. There were far more opportunities for affordable housing back then than now."

    Agreed, but What happened? Did we just stop caring? I remember when Vancouver developed the False Creek area, all sorts of coops were supposed to be built but it didnt happen. There were as many money grubbing developers as there are now. In fact the incestuous link between developer, car salesman and politician couldn't be more clear.
    Ever wonder why Surrey is a mishmash of cul de sacs and sprawl? Back in the 60s and 70s developers were as devious and corrupt as drug pushers. Huge land grabs were common with the help of sympathetic municipal politicians. People were killed and maimed over land deals gone bad.
    A place to call home, a tiny piece of space in Vancouver and all of the lowermainland is akin to a bale of cocaine, a bar of gold or apple stock. Its not the same place I grew up in for sure, but the under current of greed has always been there.
    Its sad, that Vancouver can blow billions of dollars of tax payer dollars on lavish parties, like Expo 86, the olympics and others, but can't invest anything on housing people. Its a beautiful city that has no soul.

  • surlycat

    41 weeks ago

    Despite the hype that

    Despite the hype that Vancouver is 'the most liveable city in the world', my partner and I are planning an escape. Having seen other cities has changed my mind about this place: its overrated and even if it werent, I cannot afford it and also afford to have kids and/or retire one day.

    I wont even start about the rain!

  • Bwarne

    41 weeks ago

    I'm just about out

    I'm one rent increase (expected this fall) from folding.

    I don't mind living cheap and sacrificing one thing after the other just to live in the region. But this year will probably be the last.

    Each year I've cut out something. Nothing really left to cut.
    Used the savings up to pay for rent. Sold just about everything non-essential.

    Where will I work, or, where will I live? Doesn't seem to be a way to combine both here.

    Rent increases are about 4% each year. Salary ? 0% or maybe 1%
    Over 10 years that math is pretty much soul crippling.

    Yeah - I know, the chorus will say "you hate progress" or "get a proper job and stop complaining" or "get used to it" or "stupid poor people shouldn't expect to live near the smart, rich crem-de-la-crem. Not our fault you failed math."

  • Hakuin

    41 weeks ago

    maybe we've been making a fundamental mistake

    Instead of marketing off our residential space to the slightly well-to-do we should be selling to the very wealthy. If we put up proper manor estates rather than glorified Vancouver Specials they will have to come with servant's quarters. Who says we don't provide for our children?

  • pwlg

    41 weeks ago

    freewilly

    What happened to coop housing? You can ask Brian Mulroney that question, he cancelled the program. Since then, most social housing initiatives were downloaded to the provinces and a few progressive cities have taken on the challenge.

    In terms of False Creek, it was the southwest portion of the "creek" that had most of the affordable housing built during the 1970's early 1980's. Some of the former Expo 86 lands on the north side of the creek had social housing built into it.

    But the 2010 Athlete's Village in southeast False Creek had no initial provisions for social or affordable housing, thanks to both Mayors Larry Campbell and his visionless cohorts and Sam Sullivan.

    The City of Vancouver had to take over the village when the developer could no longer find financing to finish the project in time for the Games.

    Poor sales of the village condos after the Games provided an opportunity for the City of Vancouver to make one building in the village a coop housing development. I am not sure if this would have happened if the city, the new owner, had trouble selling its condos.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.