News

'Both Sides Have to Move' Says Teachers' Union, Trimming Demands

New offer would cost $300 million more next year. Province sticks to 'net zero.'

By Katie Hyslop, 18 Jan 2012, TheTyee.ca

BCTF.jpg

Staff at John Barsby Community School in Nanaimo appealing to drivers in November.

Related

The BC Teachers' Federation announced bargaining concessions yesterday that they say could break up the "logjam" in the stalled contract negotiations with their government employer, including dropping guaranteed minimum wages for their lowest paid members in exchange for a salary increase.

Teachers say it's now government's turn to chip away at their own demands, claiming their employer hasn't moved an inch since negotiations began last March.

"We know how to compromise, we know how to bargain, we know how to negotiate. It means you reach a mutually acceptable compromise. That means both sides have to move," Susan Lambert, president of the BC Teachers' Federation (BCTF), told a press conference on Tuesday. "We're taking that initiative today, and what we hope is that this will stir government to doing the same."

But the BC Public School Employers' Association (BCPSEA), the government's bargaining agent in this fight, says they have made concessions -- eight in all -- and government says they're not making any more changes until the teachers accept their net-zero mandate.

BCTF volleys ball into government's court

Unlike most of us by now, the BCTF remembers their New Year's resolution: trying "as earnestly and honestly" as they can to sign a collective agreement with the BCPSEA this year.

Their first step towards this goal came Tuesday when they finally tabled a salary proposal, ending months of speculation over how much money they were asking for when comparing themselves to other provinces, like Alberta, which pay their teachers more.

The new proposal outlines a three-year contract, with the first year's wages going up by three per cent -- equal to the cost of living adjustment according to the union -- and then an additional three per cent in years two and three. Lambert says this will cost the government about $300 million, including the cost of benefits, for the first year.

"It's a big figure. It's a lot of money," Lambert admits, but says public teachers are responsible for the education of almost every child in the province. "It's a labour-intensive endeavour. Our schools serve the entire province. Quality public education is the most important investment a society can make. It's an investment in our future."

And $300 million, Lambert adds, is less than the $336 million per year government stripped from public education funding through Bills 27 and 28 in 2002.

In return, Lambert says the bargaining team has dropped several proposals they asked for in previous bargaining packages, including a guaranteed minimum wage for teachers on call, paid professional development leave, an early retirement incentive program, leave for third-party care and paring down discretionary leave from six days to one.

Bereavement leave has also been removed from the proposals, and Lambert says a new, mutually agreed upon definition will be hammered out at the bargaining table.

Now the union says the ball is in government's court, asking Education Minister George Abbott to make some concessions of his own.

"We are calling on Minister Abbott to give BCPSEA a new mandate to reach a fair settlement and to stop speculating about imposing a legislated contract," Lambert told the media, just an hour before teachers returned to the bargaining table to present the government with their new package.

Bargaining across a chasm

Mel Joy, chairwoman of BCPSEA, couldn't comment directly on the BCTF's new package when she spoke to The Tyee because she says the union presented it to the media before they showed it to their employers.

But she disagrees with the union that government hasn't moved from its original proposals, saying they dropped proposals last November.

"On November 22, we had taken things out of our proposal and then gave them a new package. So that was our one movement of compromise," Joy told The Tyee.

"But so far the BCTF has not yet wanted to get into a discussion on our proposals and have stated that they will not until the net-zero mandate is changed. We don't even get a chance to discuss the proposals that the employer has -- that discussion is closed at the bargaining table."

For his part, Minister Abbott says unless Finance Minister Kevin Falcon changes his stance on the net-zero mandate for all public sector employees, the BCTF's proposal is still a great deal away from government's firm position.

"This proposal is much too distant from net zero to be workable as a proposal in and of itself," he said during a teleconference late Tuesday afternoon. He says the salary increase is similar to the 16 per cent teachers got in five years during this last collective agreement, except this time it would be paid out in three years.

No decision yet on back-to-work legislation: Abbott

When asked if government was closer to intervening, Abbott expressed concern that it was close to a year since any child received a full report card, and that school administration had been saddled with extra work because of the teachers' job action. However, while Abbott was referring to the fact that bargaining began last March, the teachers didn't vote on the job action until June and didn't implement it until the following September.

But when The Tyee asked how legislating teachers back to work would affect government's relationship with teachers, Abbott said it was premature to assume that would be the outcome.

"Government has not made that decision yet, and of course I'll be sharing that decision if and when it should be made," he said.

"Looking back over the balance of 30 years, imposing legislated solutions are far more common. It's not that these are unknown, but when those occur it takes a troubled 40-year bad marriage and continues that on for a period of time until the parties can start to talk again."

All parties agree about their desire to reach a mutually agreeable collective agreement through negotiations. But with hundreds of millions of dollars still between the government and the BCTF, and both sides standing firm despite insisting the other refuses to meet halfway, it looks increasingly doubtful the teachers will get to keep their New Year's resolution.

[Tags: Education, Labour & Industry.]  [Tyee]

15  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Dan the socialist

    18 weeks ago

    How come it is never 'net

    How come it is never 'net zero' for politicians? They had up to a 48% raise a little while back.

    As well the government side does not have to bargain in good faith as at the end of the day the government will legislate teachers back to work.

    BC will suffer. If teachers are making 20,000 less here than elsewhere no doubt some will leave and really do you want pissed of teachers teaching your kids?

    Just seems from the public and government teachers are a favourite punching bag i this province. Here in Surrey with a huge growth in population all we get is cuts and cuts to schools. Kids even have to pay for stuff now we never did back in the 70's.

    The right wing government really screwed things up...

  • Granville

    18 weeks ago

    No easy answers

    On one hand, politicans are lousy examples. They give themselves pay raises while denying the same privilege to everyone else on the public payroll. City staff in Nanaimo are getting a pay raise this year, even as the rest of the city is tightening their belts and suffering yet another hefty tax increase. City staff deserve every penny they earn, but our property taxes have been increasing way above the rate of inflation.

    On the other hand, teachers do OK in my opinion and student enrollment is declining. School boards have difficult choices to make. The best solution would be to close those schools that do not have adequate capacity, and to let go surplus teachers.

    The whole system need to be redesigned - no easy task in a profession that is used to lifetime employment.

    Education and healthcare are threatening to absorb all our tax dollars. It just ain't gonna happen.

    What can you say when John Furlong is paid $250 per hour to look into the Stanley Cup riots, to a cost of over $300,000.00 etc. etc. It makes no sense at all.

  • Ruben

    18 weeks ago

    anything they want...

    Whenever I spend any time in a classroom, I walk away thinking teacher's should be paid whatever they want. A million bucks a year, I don't care. It is amazing to me that someone can handle so many kids with such grace.

    And let's face it, my kid is great, but your's are monsters.

  • igbymac

    18 weeks ago

    I think the teachers should ...

    just walk out and leave the schools barren.

    Let the government try to legislate them back to school and, if necessary, peacefully oblige if they are hauled off to jail.

    Let the parents outrage come to a boil when they have to stop their own lives to deal with their own offspring.

    Let the businesses suffer as tens of thousands of employees need to make sweeping arrangements for the youth.

    Then let's see how this government of misfits handles the situation.

    Just a thought ;)

  • Umslopogaas

    18 weeks ago

    Teacher bashing is the new racism.

    I often wonder why teachers are the new ni****s? (I use that word to make a point only.)

    It seems that the same people who made mindless, stereotypical, bigoted comments in the past, about Negroes and other minority groups, now do so every time a discussion about teachers occurs. You see it whenever an article about teachers appears in the Tyee, or anywhere else:

    "They are all lazy!"
    "They are overpaid."
    "They only work 5 hours a day!"
    "They do nothing!"
    "My son failed because of a teacher..."

    etc. etc. etc.

    If the same comments were regularly applied to any minority group, the bigotry would be decried at all levels. However the bigots can continue to denigrate teachers with impunity, encouraged by the government.

    Teacher bashing is the new racism.

    No doubt the "bashers" will be out in force now to point out how evil all the dedicated people who work with our kids every day, really are.

    Bash away ...

  • Frank

    18 weeks ago

    igbymac

    I agree, labour has the right to stop working. If the teachers simply quit en masse the government can't do anything. Nobody can be legislated back to work at a job they quit.

    If unwilling to do that, tactics become paramount. And on that subject, the teacher's only chance is to get public support and they will only do that if they drop their wage demands completely and instead focus on issues like school closings and class sizes. If teachers go to the wall because kids aren't getting a good education then the public will back them, if they go to the wall for a 15% wage increase then the public will turn away from them.

    What the union has so far given up means nothing because none of those demands were ever taken seriously by the public.

  • Frank

    18 weeks ago

    Umslopogaas

    No, teacher bashing is not the new racism. Equating the troubles of well paid professionals with those historically incurred by natives and blacks and Chinese is way over the top.

    When teachers start demanding the right to vote, the right not to pay a head tax, the right to own land, the right to enter "whites only" restaurants then I'll join you on that.

  • A Voice

    18 weeks ago

    I wonder

    what the operational cost of the teachers union is?
    Maybe cut back this cost and all the perks, and you may find out if you reduce the cost of your overhead, you would have more money on your check.
    In my house hold,lowering operational costs is always the first thing to analyze.
    Maybe a course in cost analysis is a subject that should be offered.

  • NevinTh

    18 weeks ago

    the process is broken

    One thing that is not generally reported is that, while the BCTF bargains on behalf of teachers at the provincial level, and the BCSPEA bargains on behalf of "employers" (ie, schools), it's up to the local school districts and local teachers associations themselves to hammer out collective agreements.

    So, you have the BCTF doing dumb things like instructing its members to refuse to issue report cards. You have the BCSPEA making equally dumb demands on behalf of school districts.

    In fact, if you look at the SD61 website, you'll see a couple of news releases that directly contradict BCSPEA bargaining positions; school districts, which have to work with teachers (and boards of trustees generally are comprised of former teachers), are being hamstrung by the inflammatory power politics of BCSPEA.

    In the same way, local teaching associations (there is one for every district) are forced to follow policies set by the BCTF, which has its own agenda separate and distinct from the needs of local communities.

    Not sure if there is a solution, but it would sure help if there was more informed reporting on what is a multi-faceted bargaining process.

    It's not just two sides at the bargaining table, and not everyone (including the BCTF) has the students' best interests at heart.

  • raging senior

    18 weeks ago

    Re: A Voice

    You make an interesting observation!! Without the Teacher's Union this Government would have destroyed the Education system in BC, they started in 2001. We should look at what has and does happen in the USA. California destroyed their education system years ago and then had to try to restore it at an incredible cost, they were recruiting teachers from Canada and paying more than they were earning in Canada.

    Our system is not totaly broken, just bent thanks to the Teachers and their Union. If the Government wants, as stated at the start of their reign of terror " we want the best educated and healthiest citizens in the World" what in the hell happened along the way?

  • NevinTh

    18 weeks ago

    funding

    It's not easy to compare the BC system with California, simply because in California funding can be dependent on revenues (taxes) raised by local authorities. In BC there is a per capita funding model, so all school districts are equal.

  • Umslopogaas

    18 weeks ago

    Frankly Frank ...

    How has the term "Teacher Bashing" even come about?

    Discrimination is discrimination:

    Teachers have rights under the charter that have been sadly abused. How about the right to not have your contract torn up for one? I didn't see the government apologize for that when they lost that in court. Nor are they in any hurry to fix it. They took a billion dollars out of pubic education and gave it to their corporate friends as tax cuts.

    How about the right to have some input into your profession? How about the right to meaningful bargaining? When the government violates the rights of one group and gets away with it, it will come for your group next. Get ready.

    (Frank bashing...what a sport that will be.)

    Even the United Nations condemns the B.C. Liberals for their labor practices. And it is not just teachers, it is every working person being bashed Frank. Health Care workers, construction workers, any Union workers. RCMP bashing is next ... all those doughnut-eating, Taser-happy, fat, cops with their ridiculous salaries...

    The workers who make it all happen are heavily taxed to bail out the 1% failures and the banking-crap-game goes on. If the 1% win they win big and pay low,low taxes. If they gamble and lose we have to bail them out with our tax money so that they can keep on gambling.

    Mitt Romney only pays 15% income tax and I suspect that many of our Canadian 1% don't even pay that!

    But carry on bashing the people who try to make it all work for our next generation.

    Bash the teachers, bash the health-care workers, bash the union members, bash the occupiers, bash the cops. Bash. Bash. Bash. Who cares if it hurts anyone.

  • igbymac

    18 weeks ago

    Umslopogaas

    RCMP bashing is next ... all those doughnut-eating, Taser-happy, fat, cops with their ridiculous salaries...

    The problem with this example is that the RCMP, as an organization, does not fundamentally work for the people but as protectors of the state. And the state is, by definition, corrupt. Corrupt in the sense that it has monopolistic authority to use force to meet its objectives. Thus its protective forces are equally corrupt despite the rhetoric and contrary to many of its members' earnest intentions.

    On the other hand, it is hard to envision a state without some necessary enforcement of the rule of law.

  • Frank

    18 weeks ago

    Umslopogaas

    "(Frank bashing...what a sport that will be.)"

    You're not the only one to get a warm and fuzzy feeling when that idea popped into your head. There have been others who had that epiphany before you.

    Anyway, "teacher bashing" is the result of what happens when professionals work in the public service and therefore have to have an adversarial relationship with other taxpayers. Assuming that taxpayers who make less money will always support you in your wage demands is not realistic. Other people will always have other priorities, if there's money to pay you an extra 15% they'll immediately begin thinking of other things that money could be spent on instead.

    There's a strike going on in Ontario where a group of people are being told by a private company to take a 50% wage cut. Government is not going to help them and we all are pretty sure the company wants to move their jobs to the USA anyway. Now I know its a different province but when public sector workers make demands on people being told they have to take a 50% wage cut its going to create a toxic situation.

    Here in BC we saw the real median income fall by 5% from 2000 to 2005. That's a lot of people who made less money than they had a decade before. So I'm simply pointing out that when you tell them they have to pay you more you're not going to get a lot of sympathy from them. And this government is going to exploit that to keep their own very well-paid jobs as long as possible. At least until their incredible pension benefits are locked in.

    So as I said on the subject of tactics, a 15% wage increase at this time will not go over well. If you want public support you need to fight for something the public would like to see, like better schools, more programs, smaller classes.

    That's just my observation from the sidelines as I don't have a dog in this fight.

  • whynot

    17 weeks ago

    BCTF demands

    The BCTF is hopelessly out of synch with the reality of job losses and cuts the rest of us are facing. No one believes paying higher salaries will improve schooling - it simply makes more teachers and smaller classes less affordable. The argument about salaries elsewhere misses out completely on the notion of a market: if salary matters most try life in AB but there will still be hundreds of teachers vying for jobs here. I've supported teachers for years but this demand is silly - and it could be a big help to the Liberals if the BCTF isn't more thoughtful. Try a poll: there is no public support for large raises for teachers and there is a lot of anger about what is being withheld from our children by the job action.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.