News

Bruce Carson's Fingerprints on 'National Energy Strategy'

Kanananskis agreement was framed by former Harper top aide before scandals, investigation.

By Geoff Dembicki, 21 Jul 2011, TheTyee.ca

Bruce Carson and Harper

Harper relied on Carson to burnish image of oil sands.

Related

When Canadian energy ministers met recently in Kanananskis, Alberta, a former top advisor to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, now under investigation by the RCMP, was nowhere to be seen.

But the oil sands-friendly "national energy strategy" pushed hard by the Albertan and federal governments had Bruce Carson's fingerprints all over it, green observers say.

"He really laid the groundwork for what happened in Kanananskis," Greenpeace Canada's Keith Stewart, who has blogged extensively about Carson, told the Tyee. "The ghost of Bruce Carson was definitely at that meeting."

If the 66-year-old Carson's presence was vague and shadowy, says Stewart, so too was a communiqué on Tuesday from the federal ministry of natural resources, containing such language as "collaborative approach", "shared vision", "energy information and awareness" and "highest standards of environmental protection."

But what really spooked green groups across the country -- and Ontario's own energy minister -- was the following: "Alberta's oil sands are a responsible and sustainable major supplier of energy to the world."

For Stewart and others, here lay the heart of a sophisticated public relations strategy nearly a year and a half in the making -- and one spearheaded by an advisor formerly so close to Prime Minister Harper that he had his own nickname, "the Mechanic."

Carson: scandal and spin

Carson gained national notoriety this spring when the Aboriginal People's Television Network revealed he'd used political connections in Ottawa to secure a lucrative contract for his 22-year old fiancée, a former prostitute.

Now the subject of three federal inquiries -- including an RCMP investigation -- Carson has all but dropped from public life.

Yet the energy ministers' meeting in Kanananskis, with its calls for a "national energy strategy", is a culmination of sorts for the work he's been doing for years.

Carson was once one of Prime Minister Harper's most trusted advisors, known as "the Mechanic" for his ability to fix trying, or difficult, situations.

Shortly after his official resignation in 2008, he became executive director of the Canada School of Energy and Environment, a University of Calgary research group accused, under his leadership, of promoting Tory oil sands policies.

From April 8 to 10, 2010, Carson helped host a series of discussions, with input from top oil industry insiders and environmentalists, known as the Banff Clean Energy Dialogue.

The meeting became the genesis for the idea of a "national energy strategy" -- one that would address "growing consumer concerns around energy security, trade protectionism and environmental threats," according to a conference paper.

"Without a coherent approach to energy development," the paper read, "any chance of meeting our climate change goals is virtually impossible."

Huddling with oil industry lobbyists

In setting up the conference, Carson deliberately excluded government officials.

"We really felt, given the history around this public policy theme, that it really had to start from outside government," Carson told CBC news.

What the news report didn't mention was that in March 2010, three weeks before the Banff Dialogue, Carson had met quietly with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers -- the country's foremost oil patch lobby -- and top ranking officials from the Alberta government and Natural Resources Canada.

The purpose of their meeting: to discuss how oil industry players could go about "'upping their game' on oil sands outreach and communication as part of a renewed strategy," according to briefing notes obtained by Climate Action Network Canada.

In plain English, charge observers such as Stewart, Carson and his colleagues were worried about media reports suggesting Alberta's oil sands industry, with its huge environmental impacts, somehow produced "dirty oil."

"You can communicate all you want," Carson explained later to Postmedia. "But if you have nothing to communicate, you're not going to go anywhere, so the idea was (that) we had to really up the environmental game."

Pressing for pipeline across BC

Only days after the Banff Dialogue, Carson appeared before a Canadian Senate committee on energy and the environment, making the urgent case for an oil sands pipeline to B.C.'s coast.

"It will be difficult, given the atmosphere and regulatory approach in which we now live, to see a pipeline being built any time soon," Carson told the committee, making implicit reference to Enbridge's Northern Gateway project. "The work you are doing could address that."

In September 2010, Carson brought his idea for a "national energy strategy" directly to Montreal for the annual meeting of Canadian energy ministers.

"We're very interested in pursuing the discussion," then-B.C. energy minister Bill Bennett told CBC news.

Over the coming months, major energy industry players, including the president of Shell Canada, picked up the call, arguing a national strategy was essential for Canada's transformation into an energy superpower.

"No doubt Carson was instrumental in getting the ball rolling, and then others jumped in," Matt Price, campaigns director for Environmental Defence, told the Tyee.

'What planet?'

For now though, the legacy of Kanananskis, and whether it could be considered a victory for Carson's vision, is unclear.

With Tuesday's communiqué, the Albertan and federal governments may now have a blueprint for actually crafting a "national energy strategy," one which they've already made clear would be used to help expedite approval of projects such as Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline.

Yet green groups immediately lambasted the assumption, pushed by Alberta energy minister Ron Liepert and federal natural resources minister Joe Oliver, that the oil sands are somehow "sustainable."

"My initial reaction was, 'What planet are these people living on?' And if it's ours, we're in trouble," Price said.

Ontario's energy minister Brad Duguid didn't buy in either, saying "we just weren't comfortable with the wording." And the absence of B.C.'s energy minister at the meeting dealt another blow.

"Carson probably would have been moderately pleased by the outcome," Stewart told the Tyee.

"But it wasn't the ringing endorsement of an oil sands-driven energy strategy that Alberta was certainly hoping for."  [Tyee]

10  Comments:

Login or register to post comments

  • Fiat lux

    44 weeks ago

    With the NAFTA and similar

    With the NAFTA and similar rackets having destroyed Canada's economy and democratic decision making powers, our miseducated economists and bought politicians have to sell the country from under people's feet to call their criminal actions "wealth creation" and "growth of the GDP".

    40-50 years ago energy efficient, independent manufacturing businesses were opening up all over, every day, paying decent wages, permitting one breadwinner per family. When kids went home from school, there was a parent in the house.

    I started my first business in Vancouver in 1957 with a $500. bankloan and was employing a half dozen tradesmen within weeks. People were buying farms and the rural population was growing, with great self sufficiency potentials for families.

    The products in the stores had long lifespans and we hardly had any garbage, even in the cities.

    There were literally hundreds of logging and lumber companies, owned by real people, making and giving good living for their workers

    Anybody could afford to buy a home. We bought our first in Vancouver for $500. down and $45/mo.

    Executives were making $25 to 50,000/yr. which was about 10 times the wages of their employees.

    Canada had no national debt. Wacky Bennett declared BC "debt free". There were no waiting lines for medical services,no homeless, no children had cancers and the overall cancer rate was 2% of the population. Same for diabetes.

    Then the powers decided that there was "too much democracy". They took over the university economics departments and forced the fraudulent neoclassical market economic theory on the world, with our dear Harper as the best example.

    [UNSUBSTANTIATED COMMENT REMOVED.]

    Rural areas are forcibly depopulated. People can't afford to buy homes, because of "foreign investors" bringing our own money back to buy up everything, paid for by Canadians.

    We're spending billions of defence, while the country is up for sale.

    We're are under huge debtloads, racked up by "fiscally responsible conservatives".

    The Asian junk products in our stores are filling up our dumps, accounted by braindead economists as GDP.

    So, what have we gained under these criminals and nuts, running the world ? Is this the much touted "freedom"? Unless we account the freedom of a ruling class to enslave the world with the perceived power of imaginary money, "created" from the air by some banks

    Ed Deak.

  • Van Isle

    44 weeks ago

    Yep, there's no doubt about

    [UNSUBSTANTIATED COMMENT REMOVED.]

  • plebe

    44 weeks ago

    more Carson magic:

    I would highly recommend the writing of blogger "Sixth Estate", who has documented some of Bruce Carson's activities in detail:

    http://sixthestate.net/?tag=bruce-carson

    [UNSUBSTANTIATED COMMENT REMOVED.]

  • realisticman

    44 weeks ago

    Same Old

    If this were Vancouver City Hall I could easily understand it.

  • Jeffrey J.

    44 weeks ago

    Symbal of Rot From Within

    "Carson was...one of Prime Minister Harper's most trusted advisors, known as "the Mechanic" for his ability to fix trying, or difficult, situations."

    Carson, sleezy acting, sleezy looking, and apparently corrupt, epitomizes the Harper regime's rot from within.

    While Harper tries over and over again to spin an image of a principled Christian, the reality keeps bubbling up. Carson represents the real Harper. How truly unpleasant.

    Thanks to the Tyee for keeping citizens informed. Great article.

  • Peter Dimitrov

    44 weeks ago

    fyi: The North American Made Energy Security Act

    On June 15, 2011 the US Congress Energy & Commerce SubCommittee on Energy & Power approved the "North American Made Energy Security Act" ---Canadians need to wake the f**k up to the reality that the continentalists are passing legislation for not just collaboration and increased integration of US & Canada, but at some point a complete annexation of Canada to the USA as its main supplier of energy, water, minerals, etc - which is now a continentalist security issue. Why the other day I saw a train, CN, formerly Canadian, with a flag- which had half a Canadian flag and half a USA flag joined together - indeed a symbol of a new political entity robustly coming into formation. At the provincial and national levels we have increasing continentalist policy & laws proposed by quisling politicians for the benefit of continental Capital- and whilst we have hundreds of thousands of Canadians sing about the "True North Strong & Free" at hockey games and the Stanley Cup- you can't get a 100 people together on this issue of national importance. Political literacy is sorely lacking in this country and its continental fate as once-independent nation is likely a fait accompli. Thanks to the Tyee and the author of this article for increasing political literacy however!

  • Frank Lee

    44 weeks ago

    The Common Thread

    Rona Ambrose, John Baird, Jim Prentice, Peter Kent and Bruce Carson. All of these appointments in connection with energy and the environment share a common denominator, and that is that the environment is simply a communications problem to be managed.

    See http://markcrawford.blogspot.com/2011/04/connecting-dots-between-ambrose-baird.html

  • Fiat lux

    44 weeks ago

    The reason for all this

    The reason for all this fraud is very simple:

    Wealth can not be created only taken from others, the environment and future generations.

    This is not my idea, or invention, but a simple and well known physical law: We can not create anything, only transfer resources into other forms.

    All economic activities are based on physical realities, except the payments for them, with ruling classes deciding who pays the full price and in what way ?

    This is something all ruling classes in history have figured out a million years ago and have been using religions, ideologies and other harebrained theories to brainwash people to enslave themselves and follow the crooks.

    Witness the cozy, ass kissing, brothers under the skin, relationship between Western capitalists and Chinese communists for the purpose of "wealth creation" through theft and the loss of human rights.

    Ed Deak.

  • MacKenna

    44 weeks ago

    Ed Deak's comment is bang on

    Like many, my father returned home from the second world war and grew his boomer family (starting in the mid-50s) in one of the many attractive suburbs built to nurture a burgeoning middle class. After two massively destructive wars, every family was supported financially by the government to grow. The Ontario government provided every family with a supplement to support moms staying home. My mother didn't stay home. She worked as a nurse and attended university in her spare time. She still received the supplement. My father's first home cost peanuts. His second home bought in the 70s cost $40,000, so homes were still relatively affordable then). Our first home was on a huge lot (most of it was garden space) where we kids played to our heart's content. Our home bordered on a large greenbelt and all the kids in the neighbourhood played there too, disappearing for long hours. Our mothers never worried about us. We walked a quarter of a mile to school in groups. Our dog would meet us there at the end of the day. I mean how idyllic was that? But this was my world, my Canada. I was raised to believe in a world where people were looked after, health care was fully available and you could be what you wanted to be. Even as it began unravelling in the mid-eighties when NAFTA and Mulroney came in, I still wanted to believe it.

    People still believe it. The American Dream has been dead for at least 40 years and people still want to believe it.

    We received a solid three-R education and university was a no brainer. Every child had the opportunity and tuition was dirt cheap in the seventies.

    There was no homelessness in the seventies and even the eighties. It wasn't until Brian Mulroney and the offshoring of manufacturing that the middle class began to erode.

    The one thing Ed didn't mention but I think is key is the evolution of cheap credit. In my father's day people borrowed for one thing only. Their house. My dad even paid cash for his car (a luxury he treasured). He didn't believe in borrowing and to this day he doesn't use credit cards. In his day you saved for what you needed and in his day YOU COULD SAVE.

    But as credit evolved to cover everything, prices also began to rise to outrageous levels. Now certainly people can buy loads of cheaply made Chinese crap they don't need, but they can't afford food and housing. The items you need to survive are unaffordable.

    Anyway I am blathering now...but I'm so furious that this is what we've come to. I've reached a point where I'm opting out of the system. I want a different life, not this bill of goods capitalism is pimping.

  • Fiat lux

    44 weeks ago

    Mac.....We realized by the

    Mac.....We realized by the mid 70s that some monumental crime was brewing politically and, having experienced the depression and war years in Europe, decided to become as self sufficient as possible.

    In the early 70s I custom built a super efficient, modern, new home in Vancouver. We sold it for $65,000 in '79. A year later it as sold to Hong Kong refugees for $138,000. Since then it was demolished and replaced with some monstrosity, the roof of which I can see on Google Earth, probably for a half million.

    We sold our business in Richmond, but never got paid. The buyer set up a phony company on paper, bought the products of our business at bankruptcy prices and resold them through the paper company at the correct prices, pushing the shop to the edge of bankruptcy, so he could get away with paying us .20 cents on the Dollar. He smoked himself to death, but the shop is still there, advertised as Established in 1957.

    We bought 120 acres here in the Cariboo and started building. Had some tough years without money, but we made it and never looked back.

    Now, in our 80s, we know we've made the best choice by stopping the world and getting the hell out of the city to become as self sufficient as possible, living well on our pensions.

    Anybody who can, should buy some land to grow things on, set up workshops to make things they need, build and live like human beings, and not herded around by ruling classes for royal screw.

    Ed Deak.

    • The discussion for this story is closed. No more comments can be added.